The present application relates to wing extensions, and more particularly to a wing extension for a tiltrotor aircraft.
Tiltrotor and tiltwing aircraft operate in two modes: helicopter and airplane modes. In helicopter mode, the aircraft's rotors are positioned to create lift, thereby enabling the aircraft to achieve vertical take-off and landing. In this configuration, the aircraft is essentially a helicopter. As the aircraft gains speed, the rotors are slowly tilted forward, eventually transitioning to airplane mode. In airplane mode, the aircraft is essentially a turboprop aircraft.
A typical tiltwing aircraft transitions between helicopter and airplane mode by pivotally moving the aircraft's entire wing span to a position substantially perpendicular and horizontal to the aircraft's fuselage, respectively. The tiltwing configuration is ideal for reducing rotor wash interaction with the aircraft's wing during helicopter mode. But, a tilt-wing configuration has found very little application because conversion from helicopter to airplane mode, and vice-versa, is difficult and inefficient.
A typical tiltrotor aircraft improves upon the tiltwing configuration. Unlike the tiltwing configuration, a typical tiltrotor includes fixed wing members. In helicopter mode, the aircraft's nacelles rotate to a vertical position, and as the aircraft moves forward, the nacelles rotate to a horizontal position.
In some tiltrotor aircraft, a section of the wing span rotates with the nacelle assembly. This design decreases rotor wash loads on the aircraft's wings. This type of tiltrotor aircraft has found little application because of the difficulties associated with incorporating a partially rotatable wing in lieu of having a rigid whole wing.
In some tiltrotor aircraft, four wing members are used in conjunction with four nacelles for purposes of lifting heavy payloads. This type of tiltrotor aircraft is known as a quad-tiltrotor aircraft.
Although great strides have been made in the area of improving tiltrotor aircraft, considerable shortcomings remain.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the description. However, the invention itself, as well as, a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as described herein.
The present application discloses substantial improvements in the field of helicopters and other rotorcraft. The present application describes a rotatable wing extension that pivotally attaches to the outboard section of the aircraft's nacelle. The wing extension creates additional yaw control during helicopter mode and increases lift during airplane mode. The additional lift enables the aircraft to increase payload capacity.
Illustrative embodiments are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions will be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In some embodiments, wing extensions 75a, 75b are pivotally coupled to respective outboard sections 80a, 80b. In these embodiments, the wing extensions rotate independent of the nacelles' rotation. In some embodiments, the wing extensions could rigidly attach to the nacelles and rotate with the nacelles' rotation. Nacelles 79a, 79b carry an engine and transmission (not shown) which attach to rotors 77a, 77b. In the preferred embodiment, rotors 77a, 77b are proprotors, but it should be appreciated that any suitable rotor may be used in lieu of proprotors. In helicopter mode, rotors 77a, 77b create a rotor wash that exerts a downward force on wing members 81a, 81b and wing extensions 75a, 75b. The rotor wash can be manipulated with wing extensions 75a, 75b to create forward and reverse thrusts (see
Referring now to
In
Referring now to
In the illustrated embodiment, quad-tiltrotor aircraft 111 includes four wing extensions 113a-113d and four optional wing extension flaps 115a-115d pivotally attached to the outboard sections of respective rotor assemblies 117A-117d . Rotor assemblies 117A-117d are pivotally coupled to four respective wings members 119a-119d. Rotor assemblies 117A-117d include four nacelles 121A-121d which carry the engines and transmissions of quad-tiltrotor aircraft 111. Rotor assemblies 117A-117d also carry respective rotor 123a-123d on forward ends of rotor assemblies 117A-117d respectively. Rotor assemblies 117A-117d move or rotate relative to respective wing members 119a-119d between a helicopter mode, in which rotor assemblies 117A-117d are tilted upward such that quad-tiltrotor aircraft 111 flies like a conventional helicopter, and an airplane mode, in which rotor assemblies 117A-117d are tilted forward such that quad-tiltrotor aircraft 111 flies like a conventional propeller-driven aircraft. In helicopter mode, wing extensions 113a-113d move or rotate relative to wing members 119a-119d, thereby providing additional yaw control.
The wing extensions provide quad-tiltrotor aircraft 111 additional yaw control during helicopter mode and additional lift during airplane mode. In airplane mode the wing extensions are positioned substantially parallel to the aircraft's wing members. In this position, the aircraft's overall wing surface area increases, thereby creating additional lift. The following aerodynamic equation helps in understanding this principal:
[L=lift force; CL=coefficient of lift; p=air density; V=velocity; A=wing surface area] The equation indicates that lift is directly proportional to the wing's surface area. Assuming all other variables remain relatively constant, the equation shows that as the wing's surface area increases, so does the lift force. Increasing the lift force, hence the aircraft's payload capacity, is desired when large personnel or vehicular payloads are transported, as shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The concepts of the present application are unique in that the present application introduces a rotatable wing extension for a tiltrotor aircraft. It is evident by the foregoing description that the subject application has significant benefits and advantages, in particular: (1) the wing extension provides additional wing surface area, which enables the aircraft to carry heavier payloads during airplane mode; and (2) during helicopter mode, the rotatable wing extension provides additional yaw control.
It is apparent that an invention with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified, and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the description. Although the present application is shown in a limited number of forms, it is not limited to just these forms, but is amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/036889 | 3/12/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/8/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/104509 | 9/16/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1846992 | Decker | Feb 1932 | A |
3107882 | Matteson et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3181810 | Olson | May 1965 | A |
3666209 | Taylor | May 1972 | A |
5096140 | Dornier, Jr. et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5141176 | Kress et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
6367736 | Pancotti | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6607161 | Krysinski et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7802754 | Karem | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20060151272 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20130026302 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed by ISA/USA, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 12, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/36889. |
European Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2014 from counterpart EP App. No. 09841622.5. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed by ISA/USA, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 4, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/36889, 10 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2013 from counterpart CA App. No. 2754206. |
Examination Report dated Oct. 14, 2014 from CA counterpart App. No. 2,754,206. |
Examination Report dated Oct. 17, 2014 from EP counterpart App. No. 09841622.5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110315827 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |