The present invention relates to a hammer tip for releasable integration with a hammer, used in a size reducing machine.
Size reducing machines include rotary hammer mills, tub grinders, vertical and horizontal feed machines and the like. These machines include a plurality of hammers with replaceable hammer tips. Common design practice is for the hammer tips to be symmetrical with two top working edges. It is also common for the hammer tip to be attached to the hammer with two bolts and two nuts. U.S. Pat. No. 6,419,173 granted to Balvanz shows the symmetrical hammer tip and two bolt attachment.
One of the two hammer tip top working edges will encounter the brunt of the action and exhibit the most wear (the up position). The other symmetrical working edge is mostly out the action (the down position) and will exhibit only some wear.
Depending on the location of the hammer tip within the machine, it will exhibit more or less wear than other hammer tips.
During hammermill operation, it is important that the hammer tips are not too worn. Excessively worn hammer tips will reduce the mill operation throughput and increase the machine power consumption. Typically, the hammermill operator will inspect the hammermill tips for wear every 4 hours or as scheduled.
If a hammermill tip top working edge is observed to be worn, the two attachment bolts are removed. Typically in extreme conditions, both bolt heads are also worn and the bolts will be replaced. If both working edges of the hammermill tip are worn, the hammermill tip is replaced. If only one of the hammermill tips is worn, the hammermill tip is rotated end for end and reinstalled.
Because there are twice as many working edges (both ends of each hammer tip) compared to the number of hammers, the operator may try to overly optimize the position of the working edges. This repositioning of the working edges causes excessive downtime.
The present invention is a hammer tip comprised of two sections. The production block is the upper portion of the hammer tip and includes the top working edge. The spacer block fills the space below the production block and secures the production block positioning. The spacer block also provides additional side working edges and flat front surface with carbide facing. In one embodiment, the spacer block further includes a pair of wings extending outwardly from the left and right sides, and forwardly from the front side, of the spacer block to form additional cutting edges and to provide more surface area. In this manner, the wings provide for additional sizing of the material being ground and help move (or push or carry) more material through the grates of the size reducing machine. This results in improved efficiency.
The maximum amount of working edge (top and side) and flat impact face of the production block is desirable for grinding throughput.
One of the objects of the invention is to have a single top working edge for each hammer tip. This simplifies the replacement procedure and eliminates downtime due to excessive repositioning of hammer tips. Replacement of production blocks requires 50% less downtime due to only a single bolt removal. For reassembly, the production block is placed on top of the spacer block. This positioning guide decreases the downtime in lining up the production block and bolt.
Another object of the invention is to increase the throughput of the size reducing machine by increasing the amount of working edge. In addition to the top working edge, there are also side working edges. The spacer block includes two full length side working edges. This is substantially more side working edge compared to a symmetrical hammer tip with two top working edges. The spacer block provides a full flat face that could be fully covered with a wear resistant coating such as Caden Edge. This increase in carbide covered flat face also increases throughput. As previously noted, in one embodiment, the spacer block further includes a pair of wings extending outwardly from the left and right sides, and forwardly from the front side, of the spacer block to form additional cutting edges and to create more surface area. In this manner, the wings provide for additional sizing of the material being ground and help move (or push or carry) more material through the grates of the size reducing machine.
Another object of the invention is to reduce the amount of high-grade steel material. It is anticipated that the production block would need replacing approximately 10 times before the spacer block would need replacement. By replacing only the worn production block most of the time, a large savings in total usage of high-grade steel material is realized. Two production blocks will last substantially longer in machine use than one symmetrical hammer tip. This is because the lower half of the symmetrical hammer tip is partially worn before it is inverted and reinstalled.
Another object of the invention is to reduce the number of replacement bolts and nuts. In one configuration of the invention, the nuts are eliminated with internal threads on the production block or spacer block. In another configuration, the bolt head is protected in the production block or spacer block with a wear resistant coating.
In another configuration of the invention, a saddle back shoulder is used to resist movement of the production block or spacer block relative to the hammer. This saddle back is important for secure attachment of these parts with a single bolt.
In another configuration of the invention, a locking ledge is used between the production plus block and support block.
The nose 18 incorporated into the hammer 13 is intended to protect the distal working edge 17 from wear while in this position. After several hours of grinder operation, the distal working edge 16 would experience wear to the point that the grinder throughput is decreased. Then bolt 20 and bolt 21 would be removed, the hammer tip 15 would be inverted and the bolts replaced.
A wear resistant surface 28 such as Caden Edge is shown on the nose 18, hammer tip 15 and the top of the hammer 15.
The production block 31 and spacer block 32 are affixed to the hammer 30 with bolt 33 and bolt 36. The production block 31 and spacer block 32 include clearance holes for bolt 33 and bolt 36. Note how the surface plane between the production block 31 and spacer block 32 allow each of the blocks to provide support for the other.
In configuration A of
In configuration B of
Configurations A or B would also have applicability to spacer block 82 and bolt 132.
The correct geometry includes:
Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2013/0252023 Caden Edge Welding Process shows the Caden Edge weld being applied to the bottom surface of a plow sweep blade. In combination with this bottom surface Caden Edge weld, it also enhances the wear life of the plow sweep blade to apply a Caden Edge weld to the nose tip.
A typical sweep 171 overall length is 7 to 24 inches from nose 174 to sweep attachment 172. The nose Caden Edge would be approximately 1 to 3 inches in length from the nose 174 to the weld end.
In another embodiment of the hammer tip, as shown in
The spacer block 1907 comprises a body having a front side, a back side, a left side 1911, a right side 1912 and an opening 1913 formed in the body and extending between the front side of the spacer block 1907 and the back side of the spacer block 1907, the opening 1913 configured to receive a bolt 1914 to attach the spacer block 1907 to the hammer.
The production block 1900 and the spacer block 1907 each comprise a saddle back formed on their respective back sides and configured to engage with the hammer for releasable attachment thereto as described herein with respect to other embodiments. Also as described herein with respect to other embodiments of the production block and spacer block, the production block 1900 further comprises a lock pocket 1915, the lock pocket 1915 formed as a recess along a width of the front side of the production block 1900, and the spacer block 1907 comprises a lock ledge 1916, the lock ledge 1916 formed as a ledge along a width of the back side of the spacer block 1907. In this manner, the lock pocket 1915 of the production block 1900 is configured to matingly engage with the lock ledge 1916 of the spacer block 1907 when the production block 1900 and spacer block 1907 are attached to the hammer to hold the production block 1907 against the hammer and to prevent the production block 1907 from tilting away from the hammer when the top working edge 1904 of the production block 1907 is impacted by a grinding material.
In this embodiment of winged hammer tip 1999, the spacer block 1907 further comprises a pair of side working edges, the side working edges formed as a pair of wings 1917 extending outwardly from the left side 1911 and right side 1912, respectively, of the spacer block and forwardly from the front side of the spacer block. As discussed above, wings 1917 provide for additional sizing of the material being ground and help move (or push or carry) more material through the grates of the size reducing machine and into the conveyor in the same amount of time (as compared to spacer blocks without wings). This increased throughput improves efficiency of the size reducing machine. In some embodiments, wings 1917 may be partially, or substantially entirely, coated with a wear resistant coating to improve durability.
The spacer block 2007 comprises a body having a front side, a back side, a left side 2011, a right side 2012 and an opening 2013 formed in the body and extending between the front side of the spacer block 2007 and the back side of the spacer block 2007, the opening 2013 configured to receive a bolt 2014 to attach the spacer block 2007 to the hammer.
The production block 2000 and the spacer block 2007 each comprise a saddle back formed on their respective back sides and configured to engage with the hammer for releasable attachment thereto as described herein with respect to other embodiments. Also as described herein with respect to other embodiments of the production block and spacer block, the production block 2000 further comprises a lock pocket 2015, the lock pocket 2015 formed as a recess along a width of the front side of the production block 2000, and the spacer block 2007 comprises a lock ledge 2016, the lock ledge 2016 formed as a ledge along a width of the back side of the spacer block 2007. In this manner, the lock pocket 2015 of the production block 2000 is configured to matingly engage with the lock ledge 2016 of the spacer block 2007 when the production block 2000 and spacer block 2007 are attached to the hammer to hold the production block 2007 against the hammer and to prevent the production block 2007 from tilting away from the hammer when the top working edge 2004 of the production block 2007 is impacted by a grinding material.
In this embodiment of winged hammer tip 2099, the spacer block 2007 further comprises a pair of side working edges, the side working edges formed as a pair of wings 2017 extending outwardly from the left side 2011 and right side 2012, respectively, of the spacer block and forwardly from the front side of the spacer block. As discussed above, wings 2017 provide for additional sizing of the material being ground and help move (or push or carry) more material through the grates of the size reducing machine and into the conveyor in the same amount of time (as compared to spacer blocks without wings). This increased throughput improves efficiency of the size reducing machine. In some embodiments, wings 2017 may be partially, or substantially entirely, coated with a wear resistant coating to improve durability.
Although the invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments and applications, persons skilled in the art can, in light of this teaching, generate additional embodiments without exceeding the scope or departing from the spirit of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and description in this disclosure are provided to help the reader understand the invention, and do not limit the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/708,945, filed May 11, 2015, and issued on Sep. 22, 2020 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,780,441, titled “Production Plus Hammer Tip,” which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/993,335, filed May 15, 2014, titled “Production Plus Hammer Tip,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4871119 | Murata | Oct 1989 | A |
5967436 | Balvanz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6131838 | Balvanz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6364227 | Dorscht | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419173 | Balvanz et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6481654 | Balvanz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494393 | Berselli et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494394 | Balvanz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6622951 | Recker | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6971598 | Schillinger et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7055770 | Bardos | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7494080 | Knotts | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7959098 | Doppstadt | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8113453 | Bardos | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8857748 | Carson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20060196982 | Davis | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226270 | Kammerer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20120248231 | Fredsall | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130277476 | Doppstadt et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
108452893 | Aug 2018 | CN |
10223887 | Dec 2003 | DE |
2017174629 | Oct 2017 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210001346 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61993335 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14708945 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 17027178 | US |