The present subject matter relates generally to rotor blades for wind turbines, and more particularly, to winglets for wind turbine rotor blades.
Wind power is considered one of the cleanest, most environmentally friendly energy sources presently available, and wind turbines have gained increased attention in this regard. A modern wind turbine typically includes a tower, generator, gearbox, nacelle, and one or more rotor blades. The rotor blades capture kinetic energy from wind using known airfoil principles and transmit the kinetic energy through rotational energy to turn a shaft coupling the rotor blades to a gearbox, or if a gearbox is not used, directly to the generator. The generator then converts the mechanical energy to electrical energy that may be deployed to a utility grid.
To ensure that wind power remains a viable energy source, efforts have been made to increase energy output by modifying the size, configuration and capacity of wind turbines. One such modification has been to include a wingtip device, such as a winglet, at the tip of each wind turbine rotor blade. However, the use of conventional winglets often provides a variety of disadvantages. For instance, many conventional winglets are configured as suction side winglets, thereby decreasing the clearance between the rotor blades and the wind turbine tower. Additionally, many conventional winglets are designed solely to reduce noise generated by the wind turbine. As such, these winglets generally do not provide an overall impact on the performance and efficiency of the wind turbine.
Accordingly, a pressure side winglet that generally improves the overall performance and efficiency of a wind turbine would be welcomed in the art.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the present subject matter discloses a winglet for a rotor blade. The winglet may generally include a winglet body extending between a first end and a second end. The winglet body may define a sweep and may have a curvature defined by a curve fit including a first radius of curvature and a second radius of curvature. The sweep between the first end and the second end may range from about 580 millimeters to about 970 millimeters. Additionally, the first radius of curvature may range from about 1500 millimeters to about 2500 millimeters and the second radius of curvature may range from about 1200 millimeters to about 2000 millimeters.
In another aspect, the present subject matter discloses a winglet for a rotor blade. The winglet may generally include a winglet body extending between a first end and a second end. The winglet body may include a plurality of radial locations between the first and second ends and may define a chord and a twist angle at each of the plurality of radial locations generally in accordance with the values for chord and twist angle shown in TABLE 1. Each of the values for chord shown in TABLE 1 may be varied +/−25% and each of the values for twist angle shown in TABLE 1 may be varied +/−2.5 degrees
In a further aspect, the present subject matter discloses a winglet for a rotor blade. The winglet may generally include a winglet body defining cross-sectional profiles at a plurality of radial locations along the winglet body generally in accordance with the values shown in TABLE 1. The cross-sectional profiles may be joined so as to define a nominal shape of the winglet body. Additionally, the nominal shape lies in an envelope within +/−10% of each length value provided in TABLE 1, within +/−20 degrees of each cant angle value provided in TABLE 1 and within +/−1 degree of each toe angle and twist angle value provided in TABLE 1.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In general, the present subject matter discloses a winglet for a wind turbine rotor blade. In particular, the present subject matter discloses a pressure side winglet having a unique geometric shape. For example, in several embodiments, the winglet may be defined by one or more design parameters including, but not limited to, spanwise radius, chord, pitch axis, sweep, pre-bend, twist angle, cant angle, toe angle and radius of curvature. By defining the shape using such design parameters and using particular ranges of values within such design parameters, it has been found that the disclosed winglet may generally improve the overall performance and efficiency of a wind turbine.
Referring now to the drawings,
Referring to
Moreover, as will be described in greater detail below, the rotor blade 100 may also include a pressure side winglet 120 terminating at the blade tip 104. It should be appreciated that, in several embodiments, the winglet 120 may be manufactured as a separate component from the body 106 and, thus, may be configured to be mounted to the body 106 using any suitable means and/or method known in the art (e.g., by using suitable fasteners and/or adhesives). As such, the winglet 120 may be retrofit onto existing rotor blades 100, such as by removing a portion of the exiting rotor blade adjacent to the blade tip 104 and replacing such removed portion with the disclosed winglet 120. Alternatively, the winglet 120 and the body 106 may be formed integrally as a single component. For instance, in one embodiment, the winglet 120 and the body 106 may be cast together in a common mold.
For reference purposes only, it should be appreciated that the X, Y and Z directions referenced herein are generally defined as the typical directional axes utilized for conventional straight rotor blades (i.e., rotor blades that have no winglet and that are not swept, pre-bent, twisted or the like). Accordingly, the Z direction is defined along a straight axis (indicated by the axis shown in
Referring now to
As particularly shown in
Additionally, in accordance with aspects of the present subject matter, the winglet body 122 may also have a unique geometric shape designed to improve the overall efficiency and performance of the rotor blade 100. In particular, due to the unique shape, the disclosed winglet 120 may enhance the displacement of vortices at the blade tip 104, thereby decreasing tip losses and increasing the power coefficient of the wind turbine 10 (
In general, the unique shape of the winglet body 120 may be defined by one or more design parameters including, but not limited to, spanwise radius 138, chord 140, pitch axis 142, sweep 144, pre-bend 146, twist angle 148, cant angle 150, toe angle 152 and radius of curvature 154, 156, all of which are design parameters that are generally known and understood by those of ordinary skill in the aerodynamic arts. For purposes of the present disclosure, one or more of these design parameters may be defined relative to the interface 126 between the winglet body 122 and the body 106 (i.e., relative to the first end 124 of the winglet body 122). However, as indicated above, the disclosed winglet 120 may be formed separately from or integrally with the body 106. Thus, it should be appreciated that the use of the term “interface” need not be limited to embodiments in which the winglet body 122 is formed as a separate component and is separately mounted to the body 106. Rather, the term “interface” generally corresponds to the point at which the disclosed winglet shape originates along the span 116 of the rotor blade 100, with the winglet body 122 extending from the interface 126 to the blade tip 104. Thus, in embodiments in which the winglet body 122 and the body 106 are formed integrally, the term “interface” may be used to simply correspond to a reference location from which the shape of the disclosed winglet body 122 is defined.
As shown in
Additionally, as shown
Moreover, the winglet 120 may also include a pitch axis 142 defined as a function of the chord 140 at each radial location along the spanwise radius 138 of the winglet 120. As is generally understood, the relative position of each cross-sectional profile to the pitch axis 142 may be used to control the shape of the leading and trailing edges 134, 136 of the winglet 120 and may also be used as the reference point for defining the twist angle 148 of the winglet 120. As shown in
Further, the shape of the winglet body 122 may also be defined based on the translation or sweep 144 of the winglet 120 along the X axis. Specifically, as shown in
Additionally, as shown in
Moreover, the winglet 120 may also be rotated about the pitch axis 142, thereby defining a twist angle 148 for setting the winglet's angle of attack relative to the wind direction. As shown in
Further, the winglet 120 may also define a cant angle 150 corresponding to the rotation of the winglet body 122 about each local chord 140 along the spanwise radius 138. Specifically, as shown in
Additionally, as shown in
Moreover, the winglet 120 may also have a radius of curvature 154, 156 generally defining the overall curvature of the winglet body 122 in the Z-Y plane. For example, as shown in
Further, in a particular embodiment of the present subject matter, a nominal geometric shape of the winglet body 122 may be defined by the values provided in TABLE 1. As indicated above, the spanwise radius 138 of the winglet 120 may generally be defined relative to the interface 126 between the winglet body 122 and the body 106 (i.e., the first end 124 of the winglet body 122) and may extend from such interface 126 to the blade tip 104 ((i.e., the first end 124 of the winglet body 122). Thus, as shown in TABLE 1, the spanwise radius 138 at radial location #1 (i.e., defined at the interface 126 or first end 124) may be equal to 0.00 mm, with the spanwise radius 138 increasing to radial location #15 (i.e., defined at the blade tip 104 or second end 128). Moreover, in addition to the spanwise radius 138, values for the chord 140, pitch axis 142, sweep 144, pre-bend 146, twist angle 148, cant angle 150 and toe angle 152 of the winglet 120 at each radial location are provided so as to generally provide a complete nominal shape of the winglet body 122.
It should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that each radial location (radial location #s 1-15) provided in TABLE 1 generally corresponds to a particular location along the winglet body 122 at which a cross sectional profile (e.g., similar the cross-sectional profile shown in
Additionally, the values provided in TABLE 1 are shown to two decimal places for defining the shape of the winglet body 122. However, it is believed that the values defining the winglet shape may be varied without impairment of the advantages provided by the disclosed winglet 120. Accordingly, the values given in TABLE 1 are for a nominal winglet shape. It will therefore be appreciated that plus or minus (+/−) variations of each of the values provided in TABLE 1 including, but not limited to, +/− variations for manufacturing tolerances and other design considerations may be made without exceeding the scope of the present disclosure. For instance, in one embodiment, a margin of about +/−10% of the length values (i.e., spanwise radius 138, chord 140, pitch axis 142, sweep 144 and pre-bend 146) at each radial location, a margin of about +/−20 degrees of the cant angle values at each radial location and a margin of about +/−1 degree of the other angle values (i.e., twist angle 148 and toe angle 152) at each radial location may define a profile envelope for the winglet shape disclosed in TABLE 1. In another embodiment, the profile envelope for the winglet shape disclosed in TABLE 1 may be defined by a margin of about +/−5% of the length values at each radial location, a margin of about +/−10 degrees of the cant angle values at each radial location and a margin of about +/−0.5 degrees of the other angle values at each radial location.
It should also be appreciated that the nominal winglet shape provided above may be scaled up or down geometrically for use with rotor blades 100 having any suitable dimensions and/or configuration. Consequently, the values provided in TABLE 1 at each radial location may be a function of one or more constants. That is, the given values may be multiplied or divided by the same constant or by differing constants depending on the particular design parameter being scaled to provide a “scaled-up” or “scaled-down” version of the disclosed winglet 120, while retaining the winglet shape disclosed herein. This scaling could be used to adapt the winglet 120 to a larger or smaller blade. For instance, in one embodiment, one or more of the length values (i.e., spanwise radius 138, chord 140, pitch axis 142, sweep 144 and pre-bend 146) may be multiplied or divided by a first constant and one or more of the angle values (i.e., twist angle 148, cant angle 150 and toe angle 152) may be multiplied or divided by a second constant.
Additionally, as an alternative to defining the shape of the winglet body using all of the values provided in TABLE 1, the winglet shape may also be defined using the table values for a combination of two or more design parameters at each radial location. For instance, in several embodiments, the disclosed winglet 120 may be defined at each radial location simply using the values for chord 140 and twist angle 148 provided in TABLE 1. In such embodiments, the values for chord 140 may generally be varied +/−25% at each radial location and the values for twist angle 148 may generally be varied +/−2.5 degrees at each radial location to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and other design considerations. In other embodiments, various other combinations of design parameters may be used to define the winglet 120, such as by using the values for sweep 144 and pre-bend 146 at each radial location or by using the values for sweep 144 and cant angle 150 at each radial locations, with the values of such combinations having a suitable +/− variation to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and other design considerations.
Moreover, it should be appreciated that, in addition to the advantages provided by the unique shape of the disclosed winglet 120, further advantages may be obtained when the winglet 120 comprises a separate component configured to be separately attached to the body 106 of the rotor blade 100. In particular, a modular configuration may allow the winglet 120 to be easily and efficiently manufactured and stored, thereby reducing overall production costs. Additionally, as a separate component, the winglet 120 may be easily transported from the manufacturing facility to the field and may be mounted into the rotor blade 100 without the necessity of removing such rotor blade 100 from the wind turbine 10.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1273/DEL/2011 | Apr 2011 | IN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5102068 | Gratzer | Apr 1992 | A |
5275358 | Goldhammer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5332362 | Toulmay et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5348253 | Gratzer | Sep 1994 | A |
5643613 | Bott et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6089502 | Herrick et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6142738 | Toulmay | Nov 2000 | A |
7207526 | McCarthy | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7275722 | Irving et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7497403 | McCarthy | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7540716 | Wobben | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7841836 | Wobben | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7931444 | Godsk et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7988100 | Mann | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20020092947 | Felker | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20060216152 | Golinkin et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216153 | Wobben | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070252031 | Hackett et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090074583 | Wobben | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090257885 | Godsk et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110243736 | Bell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1493660 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1500814 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1596063 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1645506 | Apr 2006 | EP |
WO 02083497 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2005078277 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006111272 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006133715 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2008061739 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008077403 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,518, filed Mar. 20, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120275925 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |