Patent Application
20200290011
The present invention relates to a structured packing arrangement for packed columns, and more particularly to a wiper band assembly for reducing vapor bypass in the gaps between the structured packing and the packed distillation column wall using specially designed wiper tabs.
Distillation columns with structured packing have been used in industrial distillation applications since the 1960's including, for example, distillation applications in chemistry, petroleum chemistry, refining, air separation, and absorption. The structured packing provides a large surface area for vapor-liquid contacting within the column which increases the overall effectiveness of the distillation column.
Structured packing is typically formed by vertical packing sheets of corrugated metal with the angle of the corrugations reversed in adjacent packing sheets to form a very open structure with inclined flow channels. To simplify installation, the structured packing is provided in pre-formed segments or bricks that are often sized to fit through the column access ports or manways. Structured packing is usually installed within the column in a plurality of layers of about 8 inches (˜204 mm) to about 12 inches (˜305 mm) high and with adjacent layers rotated 90 degrees. The vertical edge of each packing sheet is distinguished by the motion it imparts to liquid flowing on the respective edge. Some packing sheets are configured such that liquid flow at the vertical edge is directed inwards while neighboring packing sheets would have a vertical edge whose corrugations direct liquid flow in an outward direction towards the vertical wall surface.
Persons skilled in the art of distillation column design have long recognized the deleterious effect of excessive liquid flow along the column wall and there have been attempts to mitigate that effect, such as by the use of conventional wall wipers or wiper tabs. Such wall wipers or wiper tabs are located around the perimeter of each layer and provide a contact seal between the structured packing and the column wall and direct descending liquid from the column wall and back into the structured packing.
While such conventional wall wipers, wiper bands, and wiper tabs provide a generally effective solution to redirecting the descending liquid flow from the wall of the column back to the flow channels within the structured packing, there remains a problem with vapor bypass, particularly vapor bypass occurring around the perimeter of the packing (i.e. along the distillation column wall).
It has been observed for large packed distillation columns the packing often shifts during column handling and transport. This movement of the packing, due to small spaces between packing bricks, gaps around the column perimeter, and deformation of the packing itself opens up spaces around the perimeter of the packing through which the ascending vapor can bypass entire sections of packing. In addition, it has recently been observed that permanent deformation of conventional wiper band tabs during installation of the packing within the column and/or subsequent transport or shifting can result in unintended vapor bypass during column operation. Regardless of the source of vapor bypass, it is well known that any vapor bypass adversely impacts distillation column performance.
The deleterious effect of vapor bypass at the column wall has previously been addressed by the use of solid metal wall wipers or other restricting devices in the annular space near the column wall. One such example of using wiper tabs or wall wipers is briefly discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,700,403 where specially designed wall wipers are contemplated for use where such wall wipers encroach into voids or gaps of the structured packing sheets. Examples of other restricting devices such as solid wipers or gaskets disposed between the structured packing and the column wall are disclosed in the European Patent Application No. 0997189 A1 entitled “Devices to Minimize Vapor Bypass in Packed Column and Method of Assembly”.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,865 presents a vapor bypass solution whereby a crown element is installed around the perimeter of the packing. It is not physically attached to the packing but rather is held in place via spring force and frictional force. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 8,807,541 discloses a similar arrangement that includes a ‘roof element’, a bottom element with ‘V’ shaped grooves which are bent in the opposite direction of the ‘roof element’, and two wall surfaces. The ‘roof element’ is specified to be of a thickness in the range from 0.05 mm to less than 2 mm, and preferably 1.5 mm. The teaching in U.S. Pat. No. 8,807,541 states that the rationale behind the design is to facilitate bending of the roof element from a cylindrical shape into a conical shape, and not the avoidance of permanent deformation. The teaching in U.S. Pat. No. 8,807,541 also states that the ‘roof element’ is subjected to a bending moment which helps to retain the crown in place, as opposed to allowing them to spring back into shape as the packing moves away from the wall.
European Patent No. 0913192 is yet another improvement upon the vapor bypass arrangements and devices shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,456,865 and 8,807,541. In European Patent No. 0913192, the concern is the prevention of crushing of the collars under the weight of the packing during horizontal installation or transportation. To address this problem. rigid elements are installed to prevent deformation of the collar under the weight of the packing.
Another relevant prior art solution to the problem of vapor bypass is disclosed in European Patent No. 0867220 where the disclosure includes a means of preventing vapor bypass by including a ‘barrier film’ around the perimeter of the structured packing which can consist of metal, plastic, rubber, or foam. Any material that is flexible and can conform to the column shell is deemed permissible. The means of maintaining contact between the film and the column shell in European Patent No. 0867220 was indicated to be not critical.
What is needed, therefore, is an improved wiper band assembly with wiper tabs that minimize vapor bypass along the column wall in a packed distillation column without adversely impacting distillation column performance.
The present wiper band and structured packing assembly may be broadly characterized as a system and method for minimizing vapor bypass in a packed distillation column by employing improved wiper bands having wiper tabs that are longer and thinner compared to conventional wiper tabs. The longer and thinner wiper tabs are also sufficiently rigid so as to provide continuous engagement between the with the interior surface of the packed column wall when the wiper tabs are exposed to pressure differentials typically seen in such packed distillation columns.
More specifically, the present wiper band and structured packing assembly comprises: (i) a structured packing element having a vertical height of not less than 125.0 mm and a defined perimeter configured to be juxtaposed to an interior surface of a packed column; (ii) one or more wiper bands attached to the defined perimeter of the structured packing element; and (iii) a plurality of flexible wiper tabs extending from the wiper bands and bent away from the defined perimeter of the structured packing element at an initial bend angle between about 20 degrees and about 45 degrees. The plurality of flexible wiper tabs each have a thickness between about 0.05 mm and about 0.25 mm and a length greater than about 50.0 mm but less than about 40% of the vertical height of the structured packing element installed in the packed column. In some embodiments, the plurality of flexible wiper tabs each have a tab length to tab width ratio of greater than about 1.0. The wiper tabs are also sufficiently rigid to remain engaged with the interior surface of the packed column wall when exposed to a typical pressure differential of about 0.0015 bar within the distillation column.
Preferably, the wiper band and structured packing assembly is configured for use in packed distillation column in an air separation unit where the structured packing comprises structured packing elements or bricks arranged within the column so as to define a gap of at least 2.0 mm between the defined perimeter of the structured packing and the interior surface of the column wall. To ensure presence of the gap, the present wiper band and structured packing assembly includes one or more spacer tabs each having a width between about 2.0 mm and 12.0 mm and that are attached to the one or more wiper bands.
The wiper bands and the plurality of flexible wiper tabs are constructed of a metal or metal alloy selected from the group consisting of stainless steel, aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper or copper alloys and avoid permanent deformation at a bending stress of less than the reported yield stress of the metal or metal alloy. To increase the net effective length of the wiper tab, the wiper tab may be formed from a corrugated metal sheet. To facilitate attachment of the wiper band assembly to the structured packing elements or bricks, the wiper band includes a plurality of holes through which attachment screws are used to attach the wiper bands to the structured packing element.
While the specification concludes with one or more claims specifically pointing out the subject matter that Applicants regard as the invention, it is believed that the invention will be better understood when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference to the
The preferred embodiments of the structured packing element suitable for use with the improved wiper band assembly is the traditional structured packing generally formed from corrugated sheets of perforated metal or plastic. The resulting structure is a very open honeycomb-like structure with inclined flow channels of the corrugations giving a relatively high surface area but with very low resistance to gas flow. In distillation column applications using structured packing, the structured packing is preferably constructed of materials selected from the group consisting of: aluminum sheet metal, stainless steel sheet metal, stainless steel gauze, and plastic. The surfaces of the structured packing may be smooth or may include surface texturing such as grooving, fluting, or patterned impressions on the surfaces of the structured packing sheets. Examples of the preferred types of structured packing are shown and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,632,934 and 9,295,925.
The size or configuration of structured packing is broadly defined by the surface area density of the packing and the inclination angle of the corrugated flow channels in the main mass transfer section of the structured packing. The preferred density of the structured packing is between about 100 m2/m3 to 1200 m2/m3 and more preferably are selected from the group of commercially available structured packing having surface area densities of 110 m2/m3; 220 m2/m3; 250 m2/m3; 350 m2/m3; 430 m2/m3; 500 m2/m3; 730 m2/m3; 950 m2/m3; and 1200 m2/m3. The geometry of the structured packing, as characterized by the inclination angle of the corrugated flow channels in the main mass transfer section of the structured packing, preferably includes a nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis of between about 35° to 70°.
The preferred structured packing configuration includes a plurality of conventional rectangular bricks. The preferred height of the bricks is between about 8 inches (˜204 mm) and 12 inches (˜305 mm), although half-height bricks of about 4 inches (˜102 mm) to about 6 inches (152 mm) may also be used.
The structured packing arrangement within a distillation column preferably comprises two or more beds of structured packing elements. Where multiple beds of structured packing elements are employed, the adjacent beds may have the same or different surface area densities and/or different geometries. For example, a first bed of structured packing elements having a first surface area density while a second bed structured packing elements having a second surface area density may be disposed above or below the first bed of structured packing elements. Similarly, the first bed of structured packing elements may have a first nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis whereas the second bed of structured packing elements may have a different nominal inclination angle to the horizontal axis.
Illustrations showing conventional wiper band assemblies and wiper tabs installed in a packed distillation column are shown in
Conventional wiper tabs often permanently deform when pushed against the interior surface 16 of the distillation column wall 15 during installation of the structured packing. As a result, if the structured packing elements 20 or bricks later shift in the direction of arrow 26 of
Turning now to
Extending from the top edge portion 34 is a first set of wiper tabs 40. Likewise, a second set of wiper tabs 45 also extend from the bottom edge portion 35 of the wiper band 32. The plurality of wiper tabs 40, 45 are configured to be bent outwardly at a prescribed angle Θ relative to the exterior surface 36 of the wiper band 32. The initial bend angle of the flexible wiper tabs is preferably between about 20 degrees and 45 degrees as measured from the vertical plane of the wiper band.
The plurality of flexible wiper tabs 40,45 each have an upper surface 41,46 and a lower surface (not shown), a length (L) preferably greater than about 50 mm and a thickness (t) of between about 0.05 mm and about 0.25 mm. From a practical standpoint, the length (L) of the wiper tab 40,45 is limited, preferably to about 40% of the vertical height of the structured packing element or structured packing brick. In other words, the combined height of the wiper tabs (upwardly extending and downwardly extending) plus the height of the wiper band is preferably less than the height of the structured packing brick. Such wiper tab height limitation facilitates ease of installation of the structured packing elements or structured packing bricks in the packed distillation column.
The wiper band 32 and the wiper tabs 40,45 are preferably constructed of a metal or metal alloy selected from the group consisting of stainless steel, aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper or copper alloys and avoid permanent deformation at stresses typically encountered when used in packed distillation columns. Preferably, the wiper band 32 and wiper tabs 40,45 are formed from a continuous metal sheet cut in a way to delineate the wiper band from the wiper tabs. In some embodiments, wiper tab may be formed from a corrugated metal sheet to increase the net effective length of the wiper tab.
The illustrated wiper band assembly 30 further includes one or more spacer tabs 50 attached to the wiper band 32. The spacer tabs 50 preferably have a width of between about 2.0 mm and about 12.0 mm. As discussed in more detail below the width of the spacer tabs is a critical parameter to consider when designing the wiper band assembly, and more particularly the length (L) and thickness (t) of the wiper tabs 40,45.
Equation 1 is used to assist in the design the wiper tab and wiper band assembly. By selecting and/or optimizing selected parameters, including wiper tab length, thickness, bend angle, and material of construction, one can design an improved wiper tab such that the maximum stress (σmax) does not exceed the yield stress of the chosen material of construction. Using these wiper tab design parameters, the wiper tabs will bow upon packing installation rather than permanently deform. For stainless steel, a common material of construction for wiper tabs, the modulus of elasticity is 29000 ksi and the yield stress is approximately 31200 psi.
where:
E is the Modulus of Elasticty of the Wiper Tab material;
t is the Thickness of the Wiper Tab
L is the Length of the Wiper Tab
Θ is the Bend Angle of the Wiper Tab
σmax is the maximum stress in the Wiper Tab; and
Wspacer is the Width of the Spacer
Error! Reference source not found. shows the wiper tab length needed to avoid permanent deformation as a function of wiper tab thickness and bend angle for stainless steel wiper tab with a 0.125 inch thick spacer tab. As can be seen in
According to Equation 1, it is not surprising that thicker wiper tabs generally exhibit a greater amount of permanent deformation than thinner wiper tabs. What is surprising is that thin wiper tabs exhibited little to no permanent deformation in experimental studies, even when the bend angle was as much as 45 degrees, as shown in
Moreover, given the amount of overlap together with the physical dimensions and characteristics of the wiper band assembly, the wiper tabs will remain engaged or in contact with the interior surface of the packed column wall when exposed to ascending flows within the distillation column at typical pressure differentials of about 0.0015 bar within the distillation column.
In order to meet the minimum coverage criteria while also avoiding permanent deformation using a stainless steel material of construction, a wiper tab design greater than about 50 mm (˜2.0 inches) in length with a wiper tab thickness of 0.25 mm or less is preferred. The initial bend angle of this preferred stainless steel wiper tab is between about 20 degrees and about 45 degrees. More preferably, the wiper tab thickness should be between about 0.05 mm and about 0.25 mm while the wiper tab length should preferably be greater than about 50.0 mm, but from a practical standpoint, the wiper tab length should also be less than about 40% of the vertical height of the structured packing element installed in the packed column.
While the present invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment or embodiments, it is understood that numerous additions, changes and omissions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims.
