The present invention relates generally to electrical connectors, and more particularly, to a modular communication jack design with an improved wire containment cap.
In the communications industry, as data transmission rates have steadily increased, crosstalk due to capacitive and inductive couplings among the closely spaced parallel conductors within the jack and/or plug has become increasingly problematic. Modular connectors with improved crosstalk performance have been designed to meet the increasingly demanding standards. Many of these connectors have addressed crosstalk by compensating at the front end of the jack, i.e., the end closest to where a plug is inserted into the jack. However, the wire pairs terminated to the insulation displacement contact (“IDC”) terminals at the rear portion of a jack may also affect the performance of the jack.
One problem that exists when terminating wire pairs to the IDC terminals of a jack is the effect that termination has on the crosstalk performance of a jack. When a twisted-pair cable with four wire pairs is aligned and terminated to the IDC terminals of a jack, a wire pair may need to flip over or under another wire pair. An individual conductor of a wire pair may also be untwisted and orientated closely to a conductor from a different wire pair. Both of these conditions may result in unintended coupling in the termination area which can degrade the crosstalk performance of the jack. Thus, a solution addressing the crosstalk in the termination area of the jack would be desirable.
A second problem that exists when terminating wire pairs to the IDC terminals of a jack is variability. A technician is typically called on to properly terminate the wire pairs of a twisted pair cable to the proper IDC terminals of the jack. Each jack terminated by the technician should have similar crosstalk performance. This requires the termination to remain consistent from jack to jack. However, different installers may use slightly different techniques to separate out the wire pairs and route them to their proper IDC terminals. Thus, a solution that controls the variability of terminations from jack to jack would be desirable.
A final issue that arises when terminating wire pairs to the IDC terminals of a jack is the difficulty of the termination process. Typical jacks provide little assistance to the technician, resulting in occasional misterminations (e.g. a wire being terminated at an incorrect location in the jack). Even if detailed instructions are provided with the jack, technicians may not read these instructions prior to installing the jacks. Furthermore, a jack with a difficult termination process can increase the installation time for the technician and result in a costly installation for the customer. Thus, a jack solution that simplifies the termination process and minimizes the possibility of technician error would be desirable.
The present application meets the shortcomings of the prior art by providing a wire containment cap having a first side including a plurality of retainers for retaining wires, a second side being opposite the first side, two sidewalls extending between the first side and the second side, and wire pair holes or slots between the first side and the second side.
A communication jack assembly is also described. The communication jack comprises a front portion including a retention clip, and a wire containment cap including a retention recess for securing the wire containment cap to the front portion. The wire containment cap comprises a first side including a plurality of retainers for retaining wires, a second side being opposite the first side, two sidewalls extending between the first side and the second side, and wire pair holes or slots between the first side and the second side.
Wire containment caps and communication jack assemblies according to the present invention may be provided in shielded or unshielded embodiments. Further, the second side of wire containment caps according to the present invention may be provided with a slot and other features allowing for the use of an integral strain relief clip.
The opening 112 provides easy access to two slots 118 having funnel-shaped slot entrances 120. A rear spine 122 separates the slots toward the rear of the wire containment cap 104 and a front spine 124-as shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, wires are separated and crossed-over as necessary toward the rear of the wire containment cap 104, before the wires are inserted into the slots 118. The saddle area 126 is sufficiently low and the rear spine 122 is sufficiently offset from the rear end of the wire containment cap 104 to provide an installer with ample room to separate and cross-over or “flip” wire pairs as necessary on the rear sides of the slots 118. One reason this flip may be necessary is because the wire pair layout on one end of a twisted pair cable is a mirror image of the wire pair layout on the opposite end of the twisted pair cable. Another reason this flip may occur is because the Telecommunications Industry Association (“TIA”) standards allow structured cabling systems to be wired using two different wiring schemes. Finally, a flip may occur because not all cables have the same pair layout.
To complete the installation, the technician need only place wire pairs through appropriate slots 118, secure individual wire pairs in the upper and lower wire restraints 128 and 130—as shown in FIG. 3—and attach the wire containment cap 104 to the front portion 102 of the communication jack 100.
The slots 118 are preferably sized so that lateral or vertical shifting of wires after the wires have been inserted into the slots 118 is reduced or eliminated. In a preferred embodiment, the wire containment cap 104 is constructed of a plastic material, such as a thermoplastic. Alternative materials, shapes, and subcomponents could be utilized instead of what is illustrated in
The shoulders 117 serve as support and stopping mechanisms to place the wire containment cap 104 in a correct physical position with respect to the front portion 102 shown in
Additional details of the wire containment cap 104 are shown in
Turning now to
The slots 218 and the slot entrances 220 of the shielded wire containment cap 204 are larger than the slots 118 of the wire containment cap 104 to accommodate wires with larger diameters. The strain relief guide slot 214 and the saddle area 226 are also modified for use with shielded cable having a larger diameter than a cable used with the wire containment cap 104. Similarly to the wire containment cap 104, the region around the opening 212 in the rear of the shielded wire containment cap 204 and the setback of the rear spine 222 provides ample room for crossing-over of wires before the wires are inserted by an installer into the slots 218.
Additional details of the shielded wire containment cap 204 are shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/135,559, filed Jun. 9, 2008, which will issue as U.S. Pat. No. 7,611,375 on Nov. 3, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/462,204, filed Aug. 3, 2006, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,384,298 on Aug. 3, 2006, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/706,370 filed Aug. 8, 2005. This application incorporates by reference in their entireties U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/598,640 filed Aug. 4, 2004; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/636,972 filed Dec. 17, 2004; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/637,247 filed Dec. 17, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4516822 | Wolfel | May 1985 | A |
5564940 | Rodriques et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5954541 | Ozai et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6056586 | Lin | May 2000 | A |
6077122 | Elkhatib et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6238235 | Shavit et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267617 | Nozick | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6338641 | Nicholls | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6338642 | Nicholls | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6338655 | Masse et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6371794 | Bauer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6592396 | Pepe et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6702617 | Clement et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6746283 | Arnett et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6854998 | Yuan | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6953362 | Mössner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7025621 | Mössner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7114987 | Nad | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7384298 | Caveney et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20050106929 | Meckley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136747 | Caveney et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070032137 | Caveney et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080242141 | Caveney et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1014498 | Jun 2000 | EP |
0143239 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100048055 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60706370 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12135559 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 12610479 | US | |
Parent | 11462204 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 12135559 | US |