The present invention relates to a wire lead guide which serves as a guide for wires between the end of the cable and a connector and a method for terminating a communications cable. In particular, the present invention relates to wire lead guide for arranging the individual twisted pairs of wires exiting the end of a telecommunications cable, their connection to a connector and the method of use of the wire lead guide in order to improve performance of the cable/connector assembly.
The development of the Category 6 standard (ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1) and its subsequent wide acceptance by the telecommunications industry has raised the transmission requirements for electrical signals in telecommunications cables to a higher level than ever. Category 6 is a performance classification for twisted pair cables, connectors and systems which is specified up to 250 MHz.
In many installations, in particular office buildings and the like, telecommunications cables are installed behind walls or in the plenum ceiling and floor spaces. These cables are typically terminated at a first end in a patch bay close to servers or other networking equipment and terminated at a second end at a receptacle in proximity to the user. At both ends the individual wires emerging from the end of the cable are spliced into the back of an appropriate connector with the front side of the connector being exposed to provide easy access for the insertion and removal of patch cables. In order to test the installed cables to assess whether or not they meet the specifications as dictated by the applicable standards, a testing equipment is attached to the front of the connector located at the patch bay and the front of the connector located at the receptacle. Measurement of the performance of length of cable, therefore, includes not only the length of cable but also the connectors through which access to the cable is gained.
As higher transmission frequencies give rise to complex changes in the behaviour of the various components, not only the performance of the individual components, in this case the cable and the two connectors, is important but also the manner in which these components are interconnected. A number considerations should be taken into account when installing telecommunications cables in order to ensure that they will meet the requisite testing specifications following installation. In particular, the cable termination on the back of the connector is an important factor and the conduction of an installation in a casual manner can lead to a significant degradation of performance.
One important electrical characteristic by which the performance of a telecommunications cable is measured is Near-End-Crosstalk, or NEXT. As is well known in the art, crosstalk is the undesired coupling from signal carrying wire to a collocated signal carrying wire. Crosstalk gives rise to undesirable interference which can severely affect transmission performance. For its part, NEXT is a measurement of crosstalk between two wire pairs of wires and is measured as the difference in signal strength between the interfering pair and the interfered pair. NEXT is directly affected by the manner in which the cable is terminated, and arises when the wires of two pairs are crossed. Crossing of wires can arise due to a number of reasons including failure to take appropriate care during installation or physical forces brought to bear on the cable or connector, for example during the installation of other cables.
Additionally, failure to take appropriate care when stripping the jacket from the length of cable as well as untwisting the twisted pairs can create a loop which can also affect performance. Therefore, installation of the cable on the back of each connector becomes very sensitive to the manner in which the installation is carried out by the installer.
In order to address the above and other drawbacks, the present invention provides for a method for terminating a telecommunications cable where the cable comprises a plurality of twisted pairs of wires arranged in a generally parallel relationship to a common axis, each of the twisted pairs having an exposed end portion. The method comprises the steps providing an interconnection module comprising a pair of contacts for each of the twisted pairs, aligning the end portions and interconnecting each of the aligned end portions with a corresponding pair of conductive contacts. The aligning step comprises arranging the end portions such that when connected to the contact pairs, the twisted pairs remain uncrossed.
There is also described a wire lead guide for isolating the end portions of a plurality twisted pairs of wires where the twisted pairs arranged in a generally parallel relationship to a common axis and distributed around the common axis. The guide comprises a guide body and a plurality of non-intersecting passageways through the body. Each of the passageways is comprised of an entrance and an exit. The end portions of one of the twisted pairs are inserted through a corresponding one of the passageways. The passageways isolate the twisted pairs of wires from one another.
There is also disclosed a connector assembly for terminating a communications cable where the cable comprises a jacket encasing a plurality of twisted pairs of wires and wherein an end portion of each of the twisted pairs is exposed. The assembly comprises an interconnection module comprised of a plurality of pairs of contacts and adapted to interconnect with the end portions of the twisted pairs and a wire lead guide comprised of a guide body and a plurality of non-intersecting passageways through the body. The end portions are inserted through a corresponding one of the passageways prior to interconnection with a corresponding one of the pairs of contacts.
Additionally, there is disclosed a connector assembly for terminating a category 6 communications cable where the cable comprises a jacket encasing four twisted pairs of wires and wherein an end portion of each of the twisted pairs is exposed. The assembly comprises an interconnection module comprised of four of pairs of terminals, the pairs of terminals adapted to interconnect with the end portions of the twisted pairs. The assembly exhibits between subsequent installations a range of alien cross talk at 100 Mhz between pairs of twisted pairs of less than 1.000 mV/V.
Furthermore there is disclosed a method of installing a category 6 communications cable, the cable comprising a jacket encasing four twisted pairs of wires and wherein an end portion of each of the twisted pairs is exposed. The method comprises the steps of providing an interconnection module comprising a pair of contacts for each of the twisted pairs, aligning the end portions; and interconnecting each of the aligned end portions with a corresponding pair of conductive terminals. The method exhibits over subsequent installations a range of alien cross talk at 100 Mhz between pairs of twisted pairs of less than 1.000 mV/V.
a and 4b are cross sectional views of the cable of
a is a perspective view of a wire lead guide in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention;
b is a side view of a wire lead guide in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention;
c is a side view (from above) of a wire lead guide in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the present invention and
a is a top plan view of a wire lead guide in accordance with a second alternative illustrative embodiment of the present invention;
b is a bottom plan view of a wire lead guide in accordance with a second alternative illustrative embodiment of the present invention and
Referring to
Note that although the socket 16 in the present illustrative embodiment is adapted to receive an RJ-45 type plug, sockets as in 16 having shapes adapted to receive other types of connectors are also within the scope of the present invention. Additionally, the connector assembly 10 could also be integrated into a patch panel (not shown) or form part of a connector assembly where the socket as in 16 is replaced by a BIX connector.
Referring to
Referring to
Category 6 cables may include an isolating separator 38 between each of the four (4) pairs of wires 34. The communications cable 32 also includes a cable jacket 40, typically manufactured from polyvinylchloride (PVC). As will be clear on referring to
Note that although the above illustrative embodiment makes reference to an Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) cable, the method and the wire lead guide could also be used in conjunction with other types if cables, for example Screened Twisted Pair (ScTP) cables or Shielded Twisted Pair (STP) cables in both round and flat configurations.
Referring back to
Note that although the interconnection module 22 has been described hereinabove with reference to IDC type bifurcated terminals as in 30, other types of contacts are also foreseeable for use in the present invention including soldered contacts or self-cutting contacts for use in “tool less” implementations.
Referring now to
As is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art, the sheaths 36 of each wire are colour coded in order to aid the installer during installation of cables onto the connectors. ANSI/TIA/EIA-568 provides for four standardised colours, that is blue, orange, green and brown, for colour coding the sheaths 36 of the individual wires 34. As is also well known in the art, one wire 34 of each pair typically has a solid coloured sheath 36 while the second wire 34 of each pair has a white sheath 36 into which a stripe having the same colour as the other wire of the pair has been imbedded along the length thereof.
In fabricating a cable 32, the twisted pairs are distributed around the core of the cable such that if the cable 32 is cut in cross section the order of the twisted pairs is predetermined. The order as defined by ANSI/TIA/EIA-568 when looking at a first end of the cable and proceeding clockwise is blue, orange, green and then brown, or alternatively when looking from the other end the reverse, i.e. blue, brown, green and then orange. In this regard, referring now back to
Referring again to
As stated above, NEXT is directly affected by the manner in which the cable 32 is terminated at that connector 10 and in particular NEXT can be introduced when the wires of different twisted pairs cross one another. Referring to
It should also be pointed out that NEXT is also affected by the manner in which the individual twisted pairs are terminated. For example, the steps of unjacketing a portion of the cable to reveal the twisted pairs and untwisting the pairs in order to insert them in the slots 48 creates a loop opening. Effort should be made to reduce this untwisting towards a minimum.
It will now be apparent from the above that in order to ensure that every installation meets the requisite performance requirements as laid down in the applicable standards, it is necessary to proceed during attaching the wires 34 to the connector 10 using a rigorous and systematic approach. Therefore, the provision of any methods or tools which ensure that the installer proceeds in a systematic fashion can serve to greatly improve the performance of the installed interconnection.
As stated above, NEXT is directly affected by the manner in which the cable is terminated, and arises when the wires of two pairs are crossed. Therefore, the ideal solution is to avoid crossing the pairs as the cable approaches the connector. Referring now to
In the present illustrative embodiment, the wire lead guide 52 comprises a guide body 53 and four (4) non-intersecting and generally parallel passageways 54 machined or cast, etc., through the upper surface 55 of the guide body 53 and into which the twisted pairs (not shown in
Referring back to
Prior to inserting the twisted pairs through the passageways 54, however, the twisted pairs should first be aligned in the correct straight sequence such that no crossing of the pairs occurs. Referring to
As stated above, the use of a wire lead guide 52 is not applicable to only the round UTP cables as commonly used. The same wire lead guide 52 may be used with other cables including both the Screened Twisted Pair (ScTP) or Shielded Twisted Pair (STP), in both round and flat configurations. Use of the wire lead guide 52 is also not limited by colour coding of the twisted pairs nor their sequence within the cable.
Referring back to
Still referring to
In an alternative illustrative embodiment the wire lead guide 52, with suitable modifications, could be integrated directly into the cover 24 of the interconnection module 22.
Additionally, the wire lead guide 52 is designed in such a way to reduce the distance between the unjacketed section of the cable and the connection. Referring to
Ensuring that twisted pairs are all of similar length also improves the mechanical strength of the interconnection by distributing the pulling force that might otherwise be applied to one twisted pair to all twisted pairs. Furthermore, the lower end 66 of the cable jacket 40 could be fastened to the wire lead guide 52 in region of the raised abutments 60, for example by using a suitable adhesive, thereby further improving the mechanical properties of the interconnection.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In brief, the wire lead guide 52 allows for a systematic installation of a connector following simple steps thereby optimising the installation time, the performance of the electrical transmission parameters as well as the mechanical strength of the installation.
For category 6 installations, TIA standards dictate that any mated connection must have less than −54 dB of crosstalk between pairs of twisted pairs. This value represents a ratio between the disturbed pair and the disturbing pair of 2 mV/V. Considering the phase of the signal, this represents a total range of + or −2 mV/V, thus a total range of 4 mV/V. Since the total assembly of a plug, a jack and the termination must meet the standards requirements, it is necessary to control the variation of each of these components in order to ensure Category 6 performance in all installations. In order to guarantee a minimum standard of performance, it is important to determine the range (between the minimum and maximum) within which the amount of cross talk between any pair of twisted pairs varies. If the range within which one of the plug, jack or termination elements can be reduced, the performance can be increased, or, alternatively, the requirements on the other elements can be relaxed.
A series of comparative tests were performed on a series of like cables terminated by different installers in a conventional fashion and terminated using a wire lead guide 52. Table 1 provides results for the cross talk between pairs of twisted pairs at 100 Mhz where the cables were terminated in a conventional fashion by a number of different installers:
Table 2 provides results for the cross talk between pairs of twisted pairs at 100 Mhz where the cables were terminated using a wire lead guide by a number of different installers:
In the above tables:
Looking at the tables, it is apparent that over a large number of assemblies, the range in levels of cross talk between pairs of twisted pairs was decreased below 1 mV/V for those terminated using the wire lead guide, as opposed to those terminated in a conventional manner where the range was in one case close to 3 mV/V.
Other advantages are also associated with the wire lead guide 52. For example, the wire lead guide 52 may be fastened to the connector assembly 10, for example using a suitable adhesive or by the provision of a snap fitting, whereby it will provide additional mechanical support thereby improving cable retention and reducing negative effects related to the manipulation of the cable (for example, excessive bending). Given its compact dimension, the wire lead guide 52 can also be easily integrated into existing designs. The wire lead guide 52 may also be used on a connector assembly 10 during a mated performance qualification session, to eliminate the variance related to the installation.
A number of other variations to the wire lead guide 52 can also be foreseen. For example, referring to
Additionally, the basic concept of the wire lead guide 52 can be easily adapted for use on a number of different connector types including those where the slots 48 are arranged in four straight pairs, two rows of two pairs, etc., by simply modifying the location of the exits 56. Furthermore, it is not necessary that the passageways 54 be linearly aligned as illustrated in the figures. The passageways 54 could, for example, alternatively be arranged in a square pattern (i.e. with four twisted pairs in a 2 by 2 arrangement) provided the exits 56 are aligned in order to maintain the requisite arrangement. Also, the device can be used in conjunction with a termination (punch) tool or it can be adapted to a “tool-less” connector, where pressure ensures the contact. Regarding the tool-less connector, the wire lead guide could be integrated into the presscap (not shown), with the twisted pairs being arranged in the presscap such that, on mounting of the presscap to an interconnection module 22 equipped with self cutting contacts (not shown), interconnection is made between the individual conductors of each twisted pair and their corresponding contact.
Additionally, different materials could be used to optimise the performance of the wire lead guide 52. For example, in order to provide enhanced electrical shielding properties it is possible to fabricate the wire lead guide 52 from a metallic material such as zinc or from a composite material containing some conductive material, such as ferromagnetic particles.
Although the present invention has been described hereinabove by way of an illustrative embodiment thereof, this embodiment can be modified at will without departing from the spirit and nature of the subject invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2429765 | May 2004 | CA | national |
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional App. No. 60/472,779, filed May 23, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5899770 | Ezawa | May 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6338642 | Nicholls et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354872 | Lilienthal et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371793 | Doorhy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6558204 | Weatherley | May 2003 | B1 |
6783402 | Chen | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6811445 | Caveney et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830488 | Bush et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6846197 | Hirokawa et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20030224666 | Yuan-Huei | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050014420 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60472779 | May 2003 | US |