1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to tubular connections. In particular, the present invention relates to a method of connecting tubulars in such a way that the connection is prevented from becoming unmade in response to expansion of the tubulars. More particularly, the present invention relates to tubular connections that use a connector to mechanically mate a box end of a first tubular with a pin end of a second tubular.
2. Description of the Related Art
In order to access hydrocarbons in subsurface formations, it is typically necessary to drill a bore into the earth. The process of drilling a borehole and of subsequently completing the borehole in order to form a wellbore requires the use of various tubular strings. These tubulars are typically run downhole where the mechanical and seal integrity of the jointed connections are critically important in the original make-up of the tubulars, during expansion of the tubulars, and after expansion of the tubulars.
Typically threaded connections are used to connect multiple tubular members end-to-end. This is usually accomplished by providing tubulars that have a simple male to female threaded connection. The male end is generally referred to as a pin, and the female end as a box. The tubulars are connected, or “made-up,” by transmitting torque against one of the tubulars while the other tubular is typically held stationary. Torque is transmitted in a single direction in accordance with the direction corresponding with connection make-up. Any torque applied to the joint in the make-up direction will have the effect of continuing to tighten the threaded joint.
When running tubulars there is sometimes a requirement to run jointed tubulars that will later be expanded by various types of expansion mechanisms. The most basic type of expander tool employs a simple cone-shaped body which is run into a wellbore at the bottom of the casing which is to be expanded. The expander tool is then forced upward in the wellbore by both pulling on the working string from the surface and applying pressure below the cone. A basic arrangement of a conical expander tool is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,348,095, issued to Worrall, et al., in 1994 and that patent is incorporated herein in its entirety. Pulling the expanded conical tool has the effect of expanding a portion of a tubular into sealed engagement with a surrounding formation wall, thereby sealing off the annular region therebetween. More recently, rotary expander tools have been developed. Rotary expander tools employ one or more rows of compliant rollers which are urged outwardly from a body of the expander tool in order to engage and to expand the surrounding tubular. The expander tool is rotated downhole so that the actuated rollers can act against the inner surface of the tubular to be expanded in order to expand the tubular body circumferentially. Radial expander tools are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,457,532 and that patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Tubulars to be later expanded are typically run downhole where the mechanical and seal integrity of the connections, or joints, are critically important both in the original and expanded state of the tubulars. The current method of making-up expandable tubulars is by the design of modified threaded connections which can be applied and handled in the same way as conventional oil-field tubulars, i.e., stabbed into each other and screwed together by right hand or left hand rotation and finally torqued to establish the seal integrity. This method of connecting tubulars, though a reliable means of connecting non-expanding tubulars, is proving to be problematic when these tubulars are expanded. The reasons for this being mainly due to the changes in geometry of the connection during expansion due to the stresses applied at the threads, or joint area. For instance, conventional tubulars expanded at the joint may disengage allowing the lower tubing to fall into the wellbore.
It is well known and understood that during the expansion of solid all tubulars, the material in the tubing wall is plastically deformed in more than just the circumferential sense. In order for a tubular to increase in diameter by plastic deformation, the material to make-up the additional circumferential section of wall in the larger diameter must come from the tubing wall itself either by reduction in wall thickness or by reduction in tubular length or a combination of both. In a plain wall section of the tubular this process will normally take place in a relatively controlled and uniform way. However, at the point of a threaded connection, or joint, the changes in wall section, which are required in order to form an expandable threaded connection, introduce very complex and non-uniform stresses during and after expansion. These during-expansion stresses significantly change the thread form and compromise the connection integrity both in terms of its mechanical strength as well as in terms of its sealing capability. Specifically, elongation along the thread helix may result in a thinning of the thread profile perpendicular to the thread helix.
Additionally, due to the changes in geometry of the threads during expansion, thread jumping may also be an issue. Further, the larger elastic deformation caused by the reduced sections of the tubing wall at the roots of the thread will introduce much higher stresses than in other areas of the expanded tubular. This in turn may lead to joint failure due to these stresses approaching or exceeding the ultimate strength of the tubing material or by introduction of short cycle fatigue caused by the cyclic nature of some expansion processes being applied at these high stress levels.
Therefore, there exists a need for a tubular connection that can withstand torque and is prevented from becoming unmade during expansion of the tubular. There exists a further need for a connection that has a higher yield strength than that of the tubular body, or pipe wall. There exists still a further need for a connection that is free to move along its profile relative to the tubular wall during expansion of the tubular.
The present invention generally relates to tubular connections that can resist torque and maintain a connection after expansion within a wellbore. In accordance with the invention, a metal insert or connector, preferably a high tensile wire, is placed within a cavity formed between corresponding machined grooves of a first tubular and a second tubular after make-up. Depending upon wellbore characteristics, the connector may be coated with Teflon, an inert sealant, or other material known to those in the art for sealing purposes.
In operation, the connector is inserted through a slot in a wall of one tubular and into the continuous cavity, this cavity being the product of the alignment of matching groove patterns machined into a box portion and a pin portion of the tubulars. In a preferred embodiment, the slot or opening is milled through the wall of the box. The slot is further milled to align with an end of the recessed groove profile of that tubular. The groove is preferably helical in nature; however, multiple individual grooves, with individual insertion points, spaced out axially on the connection can also achieve the same desired effect. Since the groove is not limited to a radiused profile, it can be dovetail in shape, square, or have an infinite number of possible profiles.
Once the groove on the box aligns with the groove on the pin, the connector, preferably a wire that has a higher tensile strength than that of the box or pin, is inserted into the slot and along the recessed groove profile, that is through the continuous cavity. Essentially, the connector becomes the carrying mechanism between the box and the pin similar to the threads in a conventional threaded connection.
Reducing or eliminating relative rotation of the pipe on either side of the connection can be accomplished by a number of different embodiments. First, cutting variable pitch grooves on both the box and the pin can address these torque issues. In so doing, the two tubulars can not disengage when the box is rotated relative to the pin due to the immediate mismatch in the connector grooves unlike a normal threaded connection. Alternatively, the tubulars can possess castellated, or toothed, ends that essentially lock the tubular ends together. In this manner, the tubular walls possess a corresponding number of locking recesses and keys that resist torque once the connection is made. Further yet, the connection can employ close tolerance fits in conjunction with a variety of different surface finishes between the two mating parts. Therefore, torque has to then overcome the friction that develops between the two pieces. Still further yet, screws that engage both tubulars can be used to couple the two tubulars together. A further embodiment applies a combination of the embodiments described above.
In order to mitigate thinning of the inserted connector, partial cuts may be made on the inserted connector along its entire length. This causes the connector to separate into a multitude of shorter sections without compromising the cross section of the connector during expansion.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In operation, the first tubular 101 and the second tubular 201 are mated together at the surface 6 with the only deviation from normal stab-in and threading procedures being that of adding a connector (not shown) into a continuous cavity formed by matching recessed grooves (not shown) of the tubulars 101, 201 as described in detail later in the specification. The stab-in procedure can be preformed with tubulars arranged in a pin up and a box down configuration or a configuration with the pin down and the box up. After run-in, the tubulars can be expanded from within by any method known to those skilled in the art. The expansion process can be run in any axial and/or rotational direction within the tubulars 101, 201. As shown, a running tool with an expander element 40 or tool attached thereto is run up the bore 400 of the tubulars. At a desired location, an operator expands the tubulars. When the expander tool 40 reaches the connection 60 between the first tubular 101 and the second tubular 201, an internal wall of the pin portion of the second tubular 201 expands into the higher tensile strength connector (not shown) and dissipates force into a wall of the box portion of the first tubular 101. The connection 60 between the tubulars 101, 201 is capable of being expanded without losing its mechanical or sealing integrity. The connector insert (not shown) that is located between the recessed grooves of the two tubulars 101, 201 does not thin or plastically deform in the same degree as the tubulars 101, 201.
An inside surface 112 (see
The connector 300 is preferably a wire with a higher tensile strength than that of the box end 100 and the pin end 200. The shape of the connector 300 preferably matches the shape of the cavity 301. Therefore, a cross section of the connector 300 can be round, square, dovetail or any shape matching the cavity 301. Additionally, partial cuts into the radius of the connector 300 and along the entire length of the connector 300 can be made in order to mitigate thinning of the connector 300 since the connector 300 separates at these partial cuts into a multitude of shorter sections without compromising the cross section of the connector 300 during expansion of the tubulars 101, 201.
Sealing arrangements (not shown) for use with the connection 60 are also envisioned. These sealing arrangements can include the use of a coating on the connector 300 such as a sealant, Teflon, or other material. The use of gaskets or o-rings comprised of an elastomer, some other non-metallic material, or a metallic material positioned between the pin end 100 and the box end 200 can provide a seal. Additionally, a metal to metal seal between an end 240 of the pin end 200 and an inside portion 140 of the box end 100 can provide a seal.
After the connector 300 is inserted into the cavity 301, it is possible that a portion of the connector 300 will extend out of the slot 130 (shown in
Additionally,
The connection arrangements shown above are but an example of a connector of the present invention. Other arrangements and embodiments may be utilized within the spirit and scope of the present invention. As such, while the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
268686 | Kaiser | Dec 1882 | A |
1678640 | Hall | Jul 1928 | A |
1820644 | Bach | Aug 1931 | A |
2226804 | Carroll | Dec 1940 | A |
2341670 | Stinson | Feb 1944 | A |
2407552 | Hoesel | Sep 1946 | A |
2751238 | Vegren | Jun 1956 | A |
2873985 | Baldwin | Jan 1959 | A |
2898136 | Hall, Sr. et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
3062568 | Andresen et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3105556 | Raulins | Oct 1963 | A |
3419079 | Current | Dec 1968 | A |
3759553 | Carter | Sep 1973 | A |
3766991 | Brown | Oct 1973 | A |
3855126 | Smith | Dec 1974 | A |
3857450 | Guier | Dec 1974 | A |
3913687 | Gyongyosi et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3989284 | Blose | Nov 1976 | A |
4076280 | Young | Feb 1978 | A |
4449596 | Boyadjieff | May 1984 | A |
4491351 | Galle, Jr. et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4591195 | Chelette et al. | May 1986 | A |
4625796 | Boyadjieff | Dec 1986 | A |
4659119 | Reimert | Apr 1987 | A |
4703959 | Reeves et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4712955 | Reece et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4754807 | Lange | Jul 1988 | A |
4771829 | Sparlin | Sep 1988 | A |
4793422 | Krasner | Dec 1988 | A |
4813493 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822081 | Blose | Apr 1989 | A |
4878546 | Shaw et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4917409 | Reeves | Apr 1990 | A |
4985975 | Austin et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5048871 | Pfeiffer | Sep 1991 | A |
5181570 | Allwin et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5251709 | Richardson | Oct 1993 | A |
5339895 | Arterbury et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5348095 | Worrall et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5388651 | Berry | Feb 1995 | A |
5520422 | Friedrich et al. | May 1996 | A |
5743333 | Willauer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782503 | Noel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787980 | Sparlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5855242 | Johnson | Jan 1999 | A |
5901789 | Donnelly et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906398 | Larsen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5924745 | Campbell | Jul 1999 | A |
5984568 | Lohbeck | Nov 1999 | A |
6012522 | Donnelly et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6109349 | Simone et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6158507 | Rouse et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6158785 | Beaulier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6189619 | Wyatt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6273634 | Lohbeck | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315040 | Donnelly | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322109 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325424 | Metcalfe et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343813 | Olson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6409175 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457532 | Simpson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6543816 | Noel | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581980 | DeLange et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607220 | Sivley, IV | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6685236 | Setterberg | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20010038206 | Olechnowicz et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020070031 | Voll et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020163192 | Coulon et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030024708 | Ring | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030168858 | Hashem | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030234538 | Hashem | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040017081 | Simpson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3413792 | Nov 1985 | DE |
0 659 975 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 803 637 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0171 144 | Oct 1997 | EP |
2742177 | Jun 1997 | FR |
2 099 529 | Dec 1982 | GB |
2 161 569 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2 392 965 | Mar 2004 | GB |
2002286183 | Oct 2002 | JP |
WO 9011455 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 9312323 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9637681 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9717524 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9822690 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9832948 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9842947 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0008301 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 03048503 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03048506 | Jun 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040108119 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |