The present invention relates generally to wireless communications, and more specifically, but not by way of limitation, to wireless access points that are configured to service a hybrid collection of standard 802.11 clients and priority access clients.
A wireless access point (AP) is a device that allows wireless devices such as computers, telephones, appliances, and other similar network enabled computing devices to connect to a wired network using Wi-Fi, or related standards. The AP allows the network enabled devices to access, for example, the Internet, or allows the network enabled devices to communicate with one another over the network. APs typically utilize one or more protocols specified in the IEEE 802.11 standards. That is, an AP may be configured to service clients that utilize one or more protocols that are IEEE 802.11 standards compliant.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a wireless access point that comprises: (a) a processor; and (b) a memory for storing instructions, wherein the instructions when executed by the processor cause the wireless access point to perform operations comprising: (i) communicating with a set of standard access clients using an 802.11 mode of communication during standard access phases; and (ii) communicating with a set of priority access clients during priority access phases, when the wireless access point is not communicating with the set of standard access clients, using a priority mode of communication.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a method of communicating with standard 802.11 clients and priority access clients that utilize a priority access MAC protocol, using a wireless access point. The method may comprise: (i) silencing both standard access clients and priority access clients prior to standard access phases; (ii) communicating with standard access clients using an 802.11 mode of communication during standard access phases; (iii) silencing both standard access clients and priority access clients prior to priority access phases; and (iv) communicating with groups of priority access clients during priority access phases using the priority access MAC protocol.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a computing device configured to communicate with a wireless access point using a media access control (MAC) protocol. The computing device comprises: (a) a processor; and (b) a memory for storing a MAC protocol, wherein the MAC protocol is executed by the processor to: (i) evaluate a priority activation frame received from the wireless access point to determine if a group identifier included in the priority activation frame corresponds to a group identifier assigned to the computing device by the wireless access point; (ii) communicate with the wireless access point, for a specified period of time specified in the priority activation frame, if the group identifier of the priority activation frame matches the group identifier of the computing device; and (iii) cease communication with the wireless access point if the group identifier of the priority activation frame does not match the group identifier of the computing device.
According to some embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to a node within a wireless communications network that schedules access for both standard 802.11 clients and priority access clients to the Internet, the node comprising: (a) a standard 802.11 client interface for communicating with client devices using a standard 802.11 mode; (b) a priority media access control/physical (MAC/PHY) interface for communicating with client devices using a priority access MAC protocol; and (c) a scheduling module that manages standard access phases and priority access phases, wherein the standard access phases comprise time periods where the node silences client devices using the priority access MAC protocol and allows client devices using a standard 802.11 mode to communicate with the node, and wherein the priority access phases comprise time periods where the node silences client devices using standard 802.11 mode and allows client devices using the priority access MAC protocol to communicate with the node.
Certain embodiments of the present technology are illustrated by the accompanying figures. It will be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale and that details not necessary for an understanding of the technology or that render other details difficult to perceive may be omitted. It will be further understood that the technology is not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
While this technology is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail several specific embodiments with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the technology and is not intended to limit the technology to the embodiments illustrated.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It will be understood that like or analogous elements and/or components, referred to herein, may be identified throughout the drawings with like reference characters. It will be further understood that several of the figures are merely schematic representations of the present technology. As such, some of the components may have been distorted from their actual scale for pictorial clarity.
The present technology provides a wireless access point (AP) that utilizes both traditional 802.11 AP modes that support standard 802.11 Wi-Fi clients, as well as a priority access MAC-PHY interface for servicing enhanced scheduled priority access clients. The present technology increases the client capacity on the AP by managing individual fixed broadband client airtime fairness, reducing latency, and advantageously providing open service to traditional Wi-Fi devices on the same radio.
By providing timed windows of opportunity during which the AP supports standards compatible 802.11 devices, and then notifying the 802.11 devices to cease transmitting for upcoming intervals, an AP can concurrently leverage those additional intervals for scheduled medium access to better manage the diverse latency sensitive higher throughput demanding fixed client population. Advantageously, a single AP can provide high capacity and improved efficiency fixed and Wi-Fi support, and adapt bandwidths as necessary to respond to the changing needs in fixed and nomadic device types and their varying usage application demands.
Fixed broadband wireless clients at homes and businesses are quite diverse in location and distance from an AP. Additionally, these clients may be directionally oriented with the AP to achieve increased operation distance by leveraging high gain directional antenna radiation patterns. Given these usage scenarios clients may heavily interfere with each other as individual clients are not visible to each other throughout the service footprint. IEEE 802.11 standards implemented at the AP attempt to solve this problem using Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA), but as distance and antenna directionality increase, almost every device becomes a hidden node causing unusable client transmission interference.
Therefore, if an AP uses traditional 802.11 CSMA and does not adapt, if one client channel does not sense the transmission of another client, the client believes it can transmit to the AP and naturally causes interference.
As a result, most fixed broadband wireless implementations implement time division duplexing (TDD) or frequency division duplexing (FDD), fixed scheduling protocols to manage the scheduling between clients using a priority access MAC/PHY layer(s). Unfortunately, these priority access layers are not compatible with the over 10 billion traditional (e.g., standard) 802.11 Wi-Fi devices, which include many smart tablet/phones and laptops.
The 802.11 standards have attempted to support some forms of quality of service improvements using, for example, Point Coordination Function (PCF) and Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF). With PCF, contention free periods are setup by the AP and managed by the AP (Point Coordinator), in which all but a single client device is allowed to transfer frames. Industry support for PCF has been very minimal and it is known that many client devices currently in deployment do not fully comply with contention free periods initiated by PCF. As a consequence, PCF cannot be used to provide reliability with regard to quality of service in networks supporting legacy users.
HCF was introduced in the IEEE 802.11e standard and provides a statistical method for providing quality of service to clients. It will be understood by to those skilled in the art that while HCF provides a level of quality of service in the statistical sense, HCF methods cannot provide the level of quality of service required for carrier/operator-grade networks.
Additionally, both PCF and HCF do not address the issues related to non-compliant devices nor the propensity of hidden nodes in the network which prevent standards based quality of service techniques to operate properly.
With the stunning growth of mobile Wi-Fi devices now representing 50% of Internet traffic, it is critical to enable service providers with flexibility to adapt to service both low latency reliable priority access clients together with nomadic standard 802.11 Wi-Fi devices in a single AP.
The present technology relates to and incorporates aspects of the IEEE 802.11 standards. Namely, the following definitions from various sections of the IEEE 802.11 standards are provided herein for reference purposes. NAV—Network Allocation Vector (also referred to as “Virtual Carrier Sensing”); PCF—Point Coordination Function; DCF—Distributed Coordination Function; PIFS—Point Coordination Function Interframe Space; and DIFS—Distributed Coordination Function Interframe Space.
The priority access client 110 may comprise a processor 115 and a memory 120. The priority access client 110 may include a priority media access control (MAC) protocol 125 that allows the priority access client 110 to communicate with an AP 130. It is noteworthy that AP 130 may communicate with a plurality of standard access clients and a plurality of priority access clients simultaneously, as will be described in greater detail below. In some instances, the priority access client 110 may be configured to utilize both standard and priority protocols to communicate with the AP 130.
It is noteworthy that both the standard access client 105 and the priority access client 110 communicatively couple with the AP 130 in a wireless manner, as will be described in greater detail below. It will be understood that the AP 130 may be coupled with a wired/wireless network 170, such as the Internet.
The AP 130 generally includes a processor 135, a memory 140 having a standard access client 802.11 layer 145 and a priority access MAC layer 150, a cache 155, and a scheduling module 160. The processor 135 of the AP 130 executes instructions within the memory 140 of the AP 130 to allow a hybrid mix of communications between both the standard access client 105 and the priority access client 110. As would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art, both the standard access client 802.11 layer 145 and the priority access MAC layer 150 may be arranged as sublayers of a data link layer of a TCP/IP layer used by the AP 130.
The AP 130 may include, for example, a wireless router or other wireless hub or device that is configured to function as an interface between client devices and a network medium, such as the wired/wireless network 170. In other instances, the AP 130 may include a node within any network that is configured to service both standard access clients and priority access clients, where the priority access clients utilize a priority access MAC layer to communicate with the node. As with the AP 130, this node is configured to schedule access to the network for both the standard access clients and the priority access clients, allowing the node to service a much greater spectrum of client devices.
Returning back to the discussion of the AP 130, there are two phases of operation for the AP 130. The first is a standard access phase of operation. During the standard access phase of operation, the AP 130 services standard non-priority 802.11 clients and/or priority access clients operating in standard 802.11 mode. These clients are able to associate with the AP 130 and send/receive data during this phase.
The second phase of operation for the AP 130 is a priority access phase. During the priority access phase of operation, the AP 130 services priority access clients that run a priority access MAC protocol. Advantageously, the AP 130 allows for the scheduling of both the standard and priority access clients using the scheduling module 160.
Broadly described, the scheduling module 160 manages standard access phases and priority access phases for the AP 130. A standard access phase comprise a time period where the AP 130 allows only client devices using a standard 802.11 mode to communicate with the AP 130. Conversely, the priority access phases comprise time periods where the scheduling module 160 of the AP 130 allows only client devices using the priority access MAC protocol to communicate with the AP 130. Priority may be referred to as proprietary or fixed-access. In sum, prior to each phase (standard or priority), the AP 130 is configured to transmit a silencing signal to all clients, regardless of the mode of communication utilized by the client device.
More specifically, the phases are implemented by the scheduling module 160 in time divided intervals. For reference purposes, TS is the duration that the AP 130 is allowed to operate in a standard access phase and Tp is the duration of operation in a priority access phase. Again, the scheduling module 160 of the AP 130 alternates these phases such that they repeat over time as shown in
Once the clients have been associated, the AP 130 loads an association context for the clients. In some instances, an association context may include encryption keys for the supported clients, which are stored into the cache 155. During the standard access phase, the AP 130 allows for automatic sharing of the wired or wireless network 170 associated with the AP 130 through the use of Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) and a random back-off time following a busy medium condition as per the DCF operation described in the IEEE 802.11 standard. The AP 130 may perform Career Sensing (CS) through both virtual and physical mechanisms.
It is noteworthy that the 802.11 standard allows a maximum CTS-to-Self duration value of NAVMAX=32767, (i.e., 32 ms). If TP>NAVMAX, the AP 130 sets the duration field to NAVMAX. Additionally, the AP 130 sets a timer that is equal to NAVMAX. When the timer is close to expiration, the AP 130 sends another CTS-to-self frame with duration set to TP−NAVMAX (if <NAVMAX). This subsequent CTS-to-self frame forces all standard access clients (STASTD1 and STASTD2) to remain in NAV for the entire TP duration.
The transmission of CTS-to-self frames to all clients functions to silence all clients prior to the AP 130 communicating with priority access clients during the duration of the TP (e.g., a priority access phase). In some instances, the transmission of the CTS-to-self frames functions to silence both standard access clients and all priority access clients that are not in a client group with which the AP 130 is currently communicating. It is noteworthy that the AP 130 may selectively communicate with each group of priority access clients using an association context, such as a group ID and encryption key. As will be described in greater detail below, the AP 130 may selectively communicate with priority access clients using priority activation and deactivation frames, within a given priority access phase.
It will be understood that the AP 130 may send as many CTS-to-Self frames as required for all the standard operating clients to remain in NAV for duration of TP. In some embodiments, the AP 130 may send the CTS-to-Self frames at a data rate such that all standard operating clients, including 802.11n clients that operate in the same band, do not interfere with the AP 130 operation during the priority access phase.
Immediately after sending a CTS-to-Self frame, the AP 130 switches a TX/RX profile at the AP 130 in order to service priority access clients that belong to Client Group 1 (CG1). One example of this is the reloading of the hardware accelerated encryption key cache 155. Let Gmax be the maximum keys (e.g., association context) that could be cached (currently Gmax=128) at the AP 130 at any point of time. This limits the number of clients that can communicate with the AP with encrypted frames. In some instances, any associated priority access clients and standard access clients that do not have their keys cached will not be able to communicate with AP until their keys are reloaded.
At the start of the priority access phase, the AP 130 sends a priority Action Frame called here as Priority Activation Frame (PAF) with CG_ID 1 and Duration dcg1(<dp) specified. Broadly, the PAF includes a client group identifier and a duration that specifies how long the client group is allowed to contend for access to the network 170.
The AP 130 then loads the cache 155 with an association context, such as any encryption key for the STAPA (priority access clients) that belong the CG_ID 1 group. Clients that belong to CG_ID 1 begin to contend for a channel opened by the AP 130, upon the clients receiving a PAF from the AP 130 after a duration of dc. The dc duration is a time the AP 130 requires to reload the cache 155 with new keys. This allows clients that belong to CG_ID 1 to access the channel for a duration of dcg1. When the duration dcg1 has passed, using a similar mechanism for switching from standard to priority access phase, the AP 130 waits until current transaction is complete and sends a PAF with CG_ID 2 and duration dcg2 and reloads the cache 155. STAPA that belong to CG_ID 2 start to contend for the channel after expiration of the duration dc. STAPA belonging to a particular group can access the medium only after receiving a PAF from AP 130 for that group and only for the duration specified in the PAF frame.
It will be understood that the “dc” duration may comprise a duration of any desired length. In some instances, the length of the duration may be predicated upon the time required by the AP 130 to reload the cache 155 with encryption keys for a client group. That is, the “dc” duration can include an arbitrary amount of time that defines how long it takes the AP 130 to unload and reload encryption keys in the cache 155. For example, the “dc” duration may be equal to the amount of time it takes to purge the cache 155 of encryption keys for client group CG_ID 1, as well as the time it takes the AP 130 to load encryption keys for client group CG_ID 2.
As an alternative shown in
The AP 130 divides the nodes into groups and assigns dCG values to the different groups taking the dp into account such that during a single phase, (dCG1+dCG2+ . . . dCGn)<(dp−dc−Tmax), where Tmax is the maximum time for an ongoing transmission opportunity (TXOP) transaction. Therefore, when a STASTD begins to contend for the channel after its NAV, the AP 130 has already loaded an association context of the STASTD in its cache 155 and has switched to the standard access phase of operation. The STASTD are now serviced and the operation repeats over time.
In some embodiments the AP 130 includes an 802.11ac 4×4:4 DL-MU-MIMO processor, configured with four panel antennas fixed 90-degree radiation patterns with limited overlap to achieve a near 360-degree total coverage. Additional details regarding antennas having four panel antennas fixed 90-degree radiation patterns are described in co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/774,532, filed on Mar. 7, 2013, entitled “Simultaneous Downlink Transmission to Multiple Single-User MIMO Clients,” which is incorporated by reference herein.
Next, the method may include transmitting 915 a silencing signal to all clients prior to priority access phases. The method may then include selectively communicating 920 with groups of priority access clients during priority access phases using the priority access MAC protocol. It will be understood that the AP may “selectively” communicate with each of the groups of priority clients by transmitting priority activation and deactivation frames as described above. Thus, the AP may communicate with each group of priority clients within a given priority access phase, while standard access clients are in, for example, an NAV mode.
It is noteworthy that the steps shown in
The components shown in
Mass storage device 1030, which may be implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor 1010. Mass storage device 1030 may store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present invention for purposes of loading that software into main memory 1020.
Portable storage medium drive(s) 1040 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk, digital video disc, or USB storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computing system 1000 of
Input devices 1060 provide a portion of a user interface. Input devices 1060 may include an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alpha-numeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. Additionally, the device 1000 as shown in
Graphics display 1070 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Graphics display 1070 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripheral device(s) 1080 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computing system. Peripheral device(s) 1080 may include a modem or a router.
The components provided in the computing device 1000 of
Some of the above-described functions may be composed of instructions that are stored on storage media (e.g., computer-readable medium). The instructions may be retrieved and executed by the processor. Some examples of storage media are memory devices, tapes, disks, and the like. The instructions are operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to operate in accord with the technology. Those skilled in the art are familiar with instructions, processor(s), and storage media.
It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the technology. The terms “computer-readable storage medium” and “computer-readable storage media” as used herein refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a CPU for execution. Such media can take many forms, including, but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media and transmission media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as a fixed disk. Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as system RAM. Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, among others, including the wires that comprise one embodiment of a bus. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM disk, digital video disk (DVD), any other optical medium, any other physical medium with patterns of marks or holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, an EEPROM, a FLASHEPROM, any other memory chip or data exchange adapter, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to a CPU for execution. A bus carries the data to system RAM, from which a CPU retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by system RAM can optionally be stored on a fixed disk either before or after execution by a CPU.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present technology may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present technology has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present technology and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Aspects of the present technology are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present technology. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the technology to the particular forms set forth herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that the above description is illustrative and not restrictive. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the technology as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the technology should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of, and claims the priority benefit of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/741,423 filed Jun. 16, 2015, entitled “Wireless Access Points Providing Hybrid 802.11 and Scheduled Priority Access Communications,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/045,741 filed Oct. 3, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,161,387, issued Oct. 13, 2015, entitled “Wireless Access Points Providing Hybrid 802.11 and Scheduled Priority Access Communications,” which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/906,128 filed May 30, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,295,103, issued Mar. 22, 2016, entitled “Wireless Access Points Providing Hybrid 802.11 and Scheduled Priority Access Communications,” all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2735993 | Humphrey | Feb 1956 | A |
3182129 | Clark et al. | May 1965 | A |
D227476 | Kennedy | Jun 1973 | S |
4188633 | Frazita | Feb 1980 | A |
4402566 | Powell et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
D273111 | Hirata et al. | Mar 1984 | S |
4543579 | Teshirogi | Sep 1985 | A |
4562416 | Sedivec | Dec 1985 | A |
4626863 | Knop et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4835538 | McKenna et al. | May 1989 | A |
4866451 | Chen | Sep 1989 | A |
4893288 | Maier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4903033 | Tsao et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4986764 | Eaby et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5015195 | Piriz | May 1991 | A |
5087920 | Tsurumaru et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5226837 | Cinibulk et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5231406 | Sreenivas | Jul 1993 | A |
D346598 | McCay et al. | May 1994 | S |
D355416 | McCay et al. | Feb 1995 | S |
5389941 | Yu | Feb 1995 | A |
5491833 | Hamabe | Feb 1996 | A |
5513380 | Ivanov et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5539361 | Davidovitz | Jul 1996 | A |
5561434 | Yamazaki | Oct 1996 | A |
D375501 | Lee et al. | Nov 1996 | S |
5580264 | Aoyama et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5684495 | Dyott et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
D389575 | Grasfield et al. | Jan 1998 | S |
5724666 | Dent | Mar 1998 | A |
5742911 | Dumbrill et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746611 | Brown et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764696 | Barnes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5831582 | Muhlhauser et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5966102 | Runyon | Oct 1999 | A |
5995063 | Somoza et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014372 | Kent et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6067053 | Runyon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6137449 | Kildal | Oct 2000 | A |
6140962 | Groenenboom | Oct 2000 | A |
6176739 | Denlinger et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216266 | Eastman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271802 | Clark et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304762 | Myers et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D455735 | Winslow | Apr 2002 | S |
6421538 | Byrne | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6716063 | Bryant et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754511 | Halford et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6847653 | Smiroldo | Jan 2005 | B1 |
D501848 | Uehara et al. | Feb 2005 | S |
6864837 | Runyon et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877277 | Kussel et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6962445 | Zimmel et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7075492 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
D533899 | Ohashi et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
7173570 | Wensink et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7187328 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193562 | Shtrom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212162 | Jung et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7212163 | Huang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245265 | Kienzle et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253783 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264494 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281856 | Grzegorzewska et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292198 | Shtrom et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306485 | Masuzaki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7324057 | Argaman et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
D566698 | Choi et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
7362236 | Hoiness | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369095 | Hirtzlin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380984 | Wuester | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7431602 | Corona | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7498896 | Shi | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7498996 | Shtrom et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7507105 | Peters et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7522095 | Wasiewicz et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7542717 | Green, Sr. et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7581976 | Liepold et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586891 | Masciulli | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7616959 | Spenik et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7675473 | Kienzle et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7726997 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7778226 | Rayzman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7857523 | Masuzaki | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7929914 | Tegreene | Apr 2011 | B2 |
RE42522 | Zimmel et al. | Jul 2011 | E |
8009646 | Lastinger et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8069465 | Bartholomay et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8111678 | Lastinger et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8270383 | Lastinger et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275265 | Kobyakov et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8325695 | Lastinger et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
D674787 | Tsuda et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
8345651 | Lastinger et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8482478 | Hartenstein | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515434 | Narendran et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8515495 | Shang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
D694740 | Apostolakis | Dec 2013 | S |
8777660 | Chiarelli et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792759 | Benton et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8827729 | Gunreben et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8836601 | Sanford et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8848389 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870069 | Bellows | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8935122 | Stisser | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9001689 | Hinman et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9019874 | Choudhury et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9077071 | Shtrom et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9107134 | Belser et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9130305 | Ramos et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9161387 | Fink et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9179336 | Fink et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191081 | Hinman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
D752566 | Hinman et al. | Mar 2016 | S |
9295103 | Fink et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9362629 | Hinman et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9391375 | Bales et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9407012 | Shtrom et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9431702 | Hartenstein | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9504049 | Hinman et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9531114 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9537204 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9577340 | Fakharzadeh et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9693388 | Fink et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9780892 | Hinman et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9843940 | Hinman et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9871302 | Hinman et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9888485 | Hinman et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9930592 | Hinman | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9949147 | Inman et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9986565 | Fink et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9998246 | Inman et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10028154 | Elson | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10090943 | Hinman et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10096933 | Ramos et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10117114 | Hinman et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10186786 | Hinman et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10200925 | Hinman | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10257722 | Hinman et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10425944 | Fink et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10447417 | Hinman et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10595253 | Hinman | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10616903 | Hinman et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10714805 | Eberhardt et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010033600 | Yang et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020102948 | Stanwood et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020159434 | Gosior et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030013452 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027577 | Brown et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030169763 | Choi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030222831 | Dunlap | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224741 | Sugar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002357 | Benveniste | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029549 | Fikart | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040110469 | Judd et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120277 | Holur et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155819 | Martin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040196812 | Barber | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040196813 | Ofek et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240376 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040242274 | Corbett et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012665 | Runyon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032479 | Miller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058111 | Hung et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050124294 | Wentink | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143014 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152323 | Bonnassieux et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195758 | Chitrapu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227625 | Diener | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254442 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271056 | Kaneko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275527 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025072 | Pan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060072518 | Pan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098592 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099940 | Pfleging et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132359 | Chang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132602 | Muto et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172578 | Parsons | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187952 | Kappes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211430 | Persico | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070001910 | Yamanaka et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019664 | Benveniste | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035463 | Hirabayashi | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060158 | Medepalli et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070132643 | Durham et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173199 | Sinha | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173260 | Love et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070202809 | Lastinger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210974 | Chiang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223701 | Emeott et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238482 | Rayzman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255797 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268848 | Khandekar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080109051 | Splinter et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112380 | Fischer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080192707 | Xhafa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218418 | Gillette | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231541 | Teshirogi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242342 | Rofougaran | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046673 | Kaidar | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051597 | Wen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052362 | Meier et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059794 | Frei | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075606 | Shtrom et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096699 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090232026 | Lu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090233475 | Mildon et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090291690 | Guvenc et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090315792 | Miyashita et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100029282 | Stamoulis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034191 | Schulz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039340 | Brown | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046650 | Jongren et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067505 | Fein | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085950 | Sekiya et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091818 | Sen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103065 | Shtrom et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103066 | Shtrom et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100136978 | Cho et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100151877 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167719 | Sun et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171665 | Nogami | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171675 | Borja et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177660 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189005 | Bertani et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202613 | Ray et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210147 | Hauser | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216412 | Rofougaran | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225529 | Landreth et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238083 | Malasani | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315307 | Syed et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322219 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006956 | McCown | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028097 | Memik et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032159 | Wu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044186 | Jung et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110090129 | Weily et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103309 | Wang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111715 | Buer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112717 | Resner | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133996 | Alapuranen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170424 | Safavi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172916 | Pakzad et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182260 | Sivakumar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182277 | Shapira | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194644 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206012 | Youn et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110241969 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110243291 | McAllister et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256874 | Hayama et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110291914 | Lewry et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008542 | Koleszar et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120040700 | Gomes et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057533 | Junell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120093091 | Kang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120115487 | Josso | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134280 | Rotvold et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140651 | Nicoara et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120200449 | Bielas | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238201 | Du et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120263145 | Marinier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120282868 | Hahn | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299789 | Orban et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314634 | Sekhar | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003645 | Shapira et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130005350 | Campos et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023216 | Moscibroda et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130064161 | Hedayat | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082899 | Gomi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130095747 | Moshfeghi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130128858 | Lou et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176902 | Wentink et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182652 | Tong | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195081 | Merlin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210457 | Kummetz | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223398 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234898 | Leung et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271319 | Trerise | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286950 | Pu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286959 | Lou | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288735 | Guo | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301438 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322276 | Pelletier et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130322413 | Pelletier et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140024328 | Balbien et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140051357 | Steer et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098748 | Chan et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140113676 | Hamalainen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140145890 | Ramberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140185494 | Yang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140191918 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198867 | Sturkovich et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206322 | Dimou et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140225788 | Schulz et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233613 | Fink et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235244 | Hinman | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253378 | Hinman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140253402 | Hinman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140254700 | Hinman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140256166 | Ramos et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140320306 | Winter | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320377 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140328238 | Seok | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140341013 | Kumar | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355578 | Fink et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140355584 | Fink et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150002335 | Hinman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150002354 | Knowles | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150015435 | Shen et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150116177 | Powell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150156642 | Sobczak et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150215952 | Hinman et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150256275 | Hinman et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150263816 | Hinman et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150319584 | Fink et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150321017 | Perryman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150325945 | Ramos et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150327272 | Fink et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150365866 | Hinman et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160119018 | Lindgren et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160149634 | Kalkunte et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160149635 | Hinman et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160211583 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160240929 | Hinman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160338076 | Hinman et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160365666 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160366601 | Hinman et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170048647 | Jung et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170201028 | Eberhardt et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170294975 | Hinman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170353245 | Vardarajan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180034166 | Hinman | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180035317 | Hinman et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180083365 | Hinman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180084563 | Hinman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180160353 | Hinman | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180192305 | Hinman et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180199345 | Fink et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180241491 | Hinman et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190006789 | Ramos et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190182686 | Hinman et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190214699 | Eberhardt et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190215745 | Hinman | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190273326 | Sanford et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200067164 | Eberhardt et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200083614 | Sanford et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104335654 | Feb 2015 | CN |
303453662 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105191204 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105191204B | May 2019 | CN |
002640177 | Feb 2015 | EM |
1384285 | Jan 2004 | EP |
3491697 | Jun 2019 | EP |
WO2014137370 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014138292 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014193394 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO2015112627 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO2017123558 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO2018022526 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO2019136257 | Jul 2019 | WO |
WO2019168800 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Office Action,” Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000078.6, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 5 pages [10 pages including translation]. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2017/043560, dated Nov. 16, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,445, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 13, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,445, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,329, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 19, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,329, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,375, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Final Office Action, dated Nov. 24, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,375, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Advisory Action, dated Mar. 2, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,375, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,566, filed Jun. 24, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 15, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,566, filed Jun. 24, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Dec. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,128, filed May 30, 2013. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 15, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,128, filed May 30, 2013. |
Advisory Action, dated Jul. 31, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,128, filed May 30, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Aug. 25, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,128, filed May 30, 2013. |
Final Office Action, dated Mar. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,128, filed May 30, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 26, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/906,128, filed May 30, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jun. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/164,081, filed Jan. 24, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 30, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/164,081, filed Jan. 24, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Dec. 24, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 14/045,741, filed Oct. 3, 2013. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/045,741, filed Oct. 3, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 22, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/045,741, filed Oct. 3, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 3, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/045,741, filed Oct. 3, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,378, filed Mar. 5, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/741,423, filed Jun. 16, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 11, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 29/502,253, filed Sep. 12, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 16, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/325,307, filed Jul. 7, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 6, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,378, filed Mar. 5, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Apr. 7, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/639,976, filed Mar. 5, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/802,829, filed Jul. 17, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/325,307, filed Jul. 7, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 16, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/802,829, filed Jul. 17, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 15, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,375, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 30, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/657,942, filed Mar. 13, 2015. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 12, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/741,423, filed Jun. 16, 2015. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 17, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/639,976, filed Mar. 5, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Oct. 26, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 15/139,225, filed Apr. 26, 2016. |
Advisory Action, dated Jan. 19, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/639,976, filed Mar. 5, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jan. 27, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,473, filed Mar. 5, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Feb. 17, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/833,038, filed Aug. 21, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Feb. 23, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 15/246,094, filed Aug. 24, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 1, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/741,423, filed Jun. 16, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 22, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,412, filed Jul. 29, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 30, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 15/246,118, filed Aug. 24, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 31, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/316,537, filed Jun. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 10, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/639,976, filed Mar. 5, 2015. |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 13, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 15/139,225, filed Apr. 26, 2016. |
Final Office Action, dated May 11, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,375, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jun. 7, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/802,816, filed Jul. 17, 2015. |
Final Office Action, dated Jun. 22, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/657,942, filed Mar. 13, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 5, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,202, filed Sep. 8, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Nov. 26, 2013 in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2013/047406, filed Jun. 24, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Aug. 9, 2013 in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2013/043436, filed May 30, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Jul. 1, 2014 in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2014/020880, filed Mar. 5, 2014, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Jun. 29, 2015 in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2015/012285, filed Jan. 21, 2015, 15 pages. |
Hinman et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/774,632, filed Mar. 7, 2013, 23 pages. |
First Official Notification dated Jun. 15, 2015 in Chinese Design Patent Application 201530058063.8, filed Mar. 11, 2015, 1 page. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 8, 2015 in Chinese Design Patent Application 201530058063.8, filed Mar. 11, 2015, 3 pages. |
Weisstein, Eric, “Electric Polarization”, Wolfram Reasearch [online], Retrieved from the Internet [retrieved Mar. 23, 2017] <URL:http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ElectricPolarization.html>, 2007, 1 page. |
Liu, Lingjia et al., “Downlink MIMO in LTE-Advanced: SU-MIMO vs. MU-MIMO,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Feb. 2012, pp. 140-147. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2017/012884, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 9 pages. |
“Office Action,” Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000078.6, dated Jul. 30, 2018, 5 pages [11 pages including translation]. |
“Office Action,” Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000078.6, dated Oct. 31, 2018, 3 pages [6 pages including translation]. |
“Notice of Allowance,” Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000078.6, dated Feb. 11, 2019, 2 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Search Authority,” dated Mar. 22, 2019 in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2019/012358, filed Jan. 4, 2019, 9 pages. |
FCC Regulations, 47 CFR § 15.407, 63 FR 40836, Jul. 31, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 2687, Jan. 20, 2004; 69 FR 54036, Sep. 7, 2004; pp. 843-846. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Search Authority,” dated May 23, 2019 in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2019/019462, filed Feb. 25, 2019, 8 pages. |
Teshirogi, Tasuku et al., “Wideband Circularly Polarized Array Antenna with Sequential Rotations and Phase Shift of Elements,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, 1985, pp. 117-120. |
“Sector Antennas,” Radiowaves.com, [online], [retrieved Oct. 10, 2019], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://www.radiowaves.com/en/products/sector-antennas>, 4 pages. |
KP Performance Antennas Search Results for Antennas, Sector, Single, [online], KPPerformance.com [retrieved Oct. 10, 2019], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://www.kpperformance.com/search?Category=Antennas&Rfpsan99design=Sector&Rfpsan99option=Single&view_type=grid>, 6 pages. |
“Partial Supplemental European Search Report,” European Patent Application No. 17835073.2, dated Feb. 13, 2020, 17 pages. |
“Wireless Access Point,” Wikipedia.org, Jan. 6, 2020 [retrieved on Feb. 3, 2020], Retrieved from the Internet: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_access_point>, 5 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, European Patent Application No. 17835073.2, dated Jun. 30, 2020, 15 pages. |
Haupt, R.T., “Antenna Arrays: A Computational Approach”, Chapter 5: Non-Planar Arrays; Wiley-IEEE Press (2010), pp. 287-338. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170238151 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13906128 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14045741 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14741423 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15588092 | US | |
Parent | 14045741 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14741423 | US |