The transmission and reception of radio-frequency (RF) signals for use with radios requires the use of antennas. Antenna clusters (for example on a vehicle such as a police vehicle) allow the use of multiple radios (for example two-way radios and cellular telephones). To be effective the antennas cannot interfere with each other. That is, the antennas need to be isolated from one another.
As the quantity of radios, increases, there exists a need to expand the number of available antenna links that can be operated simultaneously.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
An antenna system includes a central antenna, and a plurality of peripheral antennas positioned symmetrically around the central antenna. A first coupler provides a first radio connection and a second radio connection. A first 180 degree hybrid coupler is coupled to a first two diametrically opposed antennas of the plurality of peripheral antennas. A second 180 degree hybrid coupler is coupled to a second two diametrically opposed antennas of the plurality of peripheral antennas. A third 180-degree hybrid coupler is coupled to the first and second 180-degree hybrid couplers and provides a third radio connection and a fourth radio connection. The first, second, third, and fourth radio connections are decoupled from each other, and the first, second, and third radio connections are also decoupled from the central antenna.
The first through fourth antennas 105, 110, 115, and 120 are symmetrically positioned (i.e., orthogonally) around the central antenna approximately 90 azimuth degrees apart (i.e., about a rotation axis coinciding with the vertical extension of central antenna 95 shown in
The first antenna 105 is coupled to a first node 145 of the first 180 degree hybrid coupler 125. The second antenna 110 is coupled to a first node 150 of the second 180 degree hybrid coupler 130. The third antenna 115 is coupled to a second node 155 of the first 180 degree hybrid coupler 125. The fourth antenna 120 is coupled to a second node 160 of the second 180 degree hybrid coupler 130.
A third node 165 (for example, a summing node) of the first 180 degree hybrid coupler 125 is coupled to a first node 170 of the third 180 degree hybrid coupler 135. A third node 175 (for example, a summing node) of the second 180 degree hybrid coupler 130 is coupled to a second node 180 of the third 180 degree hybrid coupler 135.
A fourth node 185 (for example, a difference node) of the first 180 degree hybrid coupler 125 is coupled to a first node 190 of the 90 degree hybrid coupler 140. A fourth node 195 (for example, a difference node) of the second 180 degree hybrid coupler 130 is coupled to a second node 200 of the 90 degree hybrid coupler 140.
A third node 205 of the 90 degree hybrid coupler 140 provides a first radio connection 210. A fourth node 215 of the 90 degree hybrid coupler 140 provides a second radio connection 220. A third node 225 (for example, a difference node) of the third 180 degree hybrid coupler 135 provides a third radio connection 230. A fourth node 235 (for example, a summing node) of the third 180 degree hybrid coupler 135 provides a fourth radio connection 240.
The result is four separate radio connections (i.e., radio-frequency ports) that are substantially decoupled from each other. “Substantially decoupled” as used herein means that the signals at the antennas, while having some overlap, have sufficient separation that the signals can be separated from one another. That is, a signal sent/received at one antenna does not impact a signal sent/received at another antenna. Three of the four radio-frequency ports are also substantially decoupled from the central land-mobile-radio antenna, with the fourth radio-frequency port substantially coupled (i.e., signal overlap) to the central land-mobile-radio antenna.
As shown in
As shown in
However, as shown in
The central antenna, is not perfectly decoupled from the fourth radio connection 240 because signals arriving from the fourth radio connection 240 impinge in-phase at the peripheral antenna feed-points and thus combine in-phase at the central antenna.
Limited to the bandwidth of the wireless broadband antenna system, the fourth radio connection 240 may also be used to operate a land-mobile-radio with a different radiation pattern (for instance, up-tilt) which may be advantageous in hi-rise urban environment, for example, downtown Manhattan, N.Y.
The fourth node 185 (i.e., a difference node) of the first 180 degree hybrid coupler 125 is coupled to a first node 310 of the fourth 180 degree hybrid coupler 305, and the fourth node 195 (i.e., a difference node) of the second 180 degree hybrid coupler 130 is coupled to a second node 315 of the fourth 180 degree hybrid coupler 305. A third node 320 (for example, a difference node) of the fourth 180 degree hybrid coupler 305 provides the first radio connection 307. A fourth node 325 (for example, a summing node) of the fourth 180 degree hybrid coupler 305 provides the second radio connection 308.
In both
The antenna feed-point incident-wave profiles shown in
A land-mobile-radio circuit 425 is coupled to a switch 430 (for example, a single-pole-double-throw relay having a pole 431, a first throw 432, and a second throw 433) which is also coupled to the fourth radio connection 240 and to the central land-mobile-radio antenna 95. A controller 435 controls operation of the wireless broadband and land-mobile-radio circuits 405 and 425 and the switch 430.
In the wireless broadband/Land-Mobile-Radio 400, no duplexer is needed for the wireless broadband signals thanks to low coupling between radio connections 210/307, 220/308, 230. The radio-frequency port 240 provides a superior up-tilt pattern which may be advantageous in hi-rise building environments to increase the dependability of Land-Mobile Radio communication systems coverage. The controller 435 controls the switch 430 coupling the land-mobile-radio circuit 425 to the land-mobile-radio antenna for better horizontal communication, and coupling the land-mobile-radio circuit 425 to the fourth radio connection 240, for better up-tilt communication in hi-rise building environments.
A land-mobile-radio circuit 540 is coupled to the land-mobile-radio antenna. A controller 545 controls operation of the wireless broadband and land-mobile-radio circuits 505 and 540 and the switch 530.
In the wireless broadband/Land-Mobile-Radio system 500, no duplexers are needed for the wireless broadband signals because ports 210/307, 220/308, 230, 240 are mutually decoupled. When the land-mobile-radio circuit 540 is communicating, for instance in push-to-talk simplex mode used in many public safety dispatch radio systems, the switch 530 couples the fourth radio connection 240 to the passive load 535 and disconnects the second transmit node 525, thus eliminating the central land-mobile-radio antenna interference on the second transmit node 525, which may cause malfunction or even damage if the radio-frequency power coupled from the land-mobile-radio antenna to said transmitter circuitry is substantial. When the land-mobile-radio circuit 540 is communicating and the second transmit node 525 is disconnected, the system 500 reverts to 1×2 MIMO mode, thus impacting only uplink data throughput because only one transmitter is allowed to operate. Obviously, a decision to limit only the downlink data throughput, implemented by swapping the connections of receiver 520 and transmitter 525, may be preferable in specific applications, for instance real-time video upstream. When the land-mobile-radio circuit 540 is not transmitting, the 2×2 MIMO mode allows up to twice the upstream (or downstream in the aforementioned alternative embodiment) data throughput compared to the 1×2 MIMO mode.
It is also possible to employ a switch matrix in lieu of single-pole-double-throw switch 530 in order to realize land-mobile-radio pattern diversity, as done in
A land-mobile-radio circuit 645 is coupled to the central land-mobile-radio antenna. A controller 650 controls operation of the wireless broadband and land-mobile-radio circuits 605 and 645 and the switch 635.
In the wireless broadband/Land-Mobile-Radio system 600, when the land-mobile-radio circuit 645 is communicating, the switch 635 couples the fourth radio connection 240 to the passive load 640 (reducing the coupling effects between the fourth radio connection 240 and the land-mobile-radio antenna) and disconnects the second secondary receive node 630. The first wireless broadband circuit 605 and the second wireless broadband circuit 620 may reside on a single chip 655, and the first wireless broadband circuit 605 and the second wireless broadband circuit 620 may operate on the same or independent networks. In addition, the first wireless broadband circuit 605 and the second wireless broadband circuit 620 may be used to provide redundancy, for instance, by up-streaming the same real-time video stream through the uplinks of independent cellular networks.
Similarly to the communication system in
The embodiments above may provide a compact vehicle-mount antenna system with excellent wireless broadband and land-mobile-radio performances due to negligible coupling and pattern correlation. High wireless broadband/land-mobile-radio transceiver isolation allows coexistence in a collocated arrangement, reduces the need for wireless broadband duplexers, and enables 2×2 MIMO or multiple wireless broadband calls simultaneously. Possible implementations of the antenna systems 100 and 300 include police, firefighters, emergency medical vehicles, or drones equipped with land-mobile-radio and wireless broadband transceivers.
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes,” “including,” “contains,” “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a,” “has . . . a,” “includes . . . a,” or “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially,” “essentially,” “approximately,” “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (for example, comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5038151 | Kaminski | Aug 1991 | A |
5189434 | Bell | Feb 1993 | A |
5264862 | Kumpfbeck | Nov 1993 | A |
5648787 | Ogot et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5818385 | Bartholomew | Oct 1998 | A |
5875391 | Riley et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5923304 | Edwards | Jul 1999 | A |
5926304 | Tajima | Jul 1999 | A |
5966102 | Runyon | Oct 1999 | A |
6064861 | Riley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067053 | Runyon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6141539 | Marino | Oct 2000 | A |
6188373 | Martek | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208135 | Shattil | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211846 | Gouin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6329954 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335706 | Elliot | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348791 | Shattil | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6492959 | Heatherwick et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509883 | Foti et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6744412 | Lopez | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6806838 | Petros et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826393 | Komurasaki et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6920315 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7138959 | Gaudette et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7417597 | Lopez | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7633998 | Dockemeyer et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8749441 | Fenn | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9148890 | Choi et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9161386 | Beghini et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
20030193446 | Chen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040150580 | Gaudette et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060133465 | Dockemeyer, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070060058 | Shattil | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090161655 | Uppala | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110032159 | Wu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130050012 | Jungmaier | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130106667 | Fenn | May 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Snow et al, “Multi-antenna Near Field Cancellation Duplexing for Concurrent Transmit and Receive,” IEEE MIT Int. Microw. Symp., Jun. 2011, pp. 1-4. |
Andersen et al., “Decoupling and descattering networks for antennas,” IEEE AP-T, Nov. 1976, pp. 841-846. |
Wallace et al., “Termination-Dependent Diversity Performance of Coupled Antennas: Network Theory Analysis,” IEEE AP-T, Jan. 2004, pp. 98-105. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170317397 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |