1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to wireless carriers, Internet service providers (ISPs), information content delivery services/providers, portal sites for mobile-terminated hosting of chat groups, and/or Internet chat session hosts. More particularly, it relates to the gateway perspective of mobile device functions such as ANSI-41 automatic registration, real-time Internet message billing, real-time wireless message billing, messaging in general, wireless chat, and/or Internet chat.
2. Background of Related Art
The present invention relates to improvements to mobile wireless systems, which currently include mobility management, IS-41 mobility management, and/or registration systems, to support, e.g., Internet chat, ICQ, etc.
Up to this point, in a Wireless & Internet chat group system, a chat member must manually notify the system when he/she desires to go on-line or off-line. This invention enables a wireless carrier and/or Internet service provider to introduce a Wireless Intelligent Network (WIN) service that allows a chat room or session system to be automatically notified when the subscriber is on-line or off-line. This will allow, for example, the chat system to continually and automatically notify the subscribers of the chat group or a “buddy list” about a participant's status in a chat room/session at any time. This WIN service will be applicable to both prepaid and postpaid IS-41 networks.
Currently no system is known to provide such WIN service for wireless devices. Existing systems allow the landline internet subscriber to automatically notify the chat group when the subscriber goes on-line or off-line.
Existing technologies have not addressed the concept of automatic notification for wireless chat participants. Without this feature, members in the chat group are not aware of the member's actual status. The wireless participants have to remember to notify the chat group or buddies of his/her availability.
As is known, presence information and location information regarding a particular wireless device is recorded in a Home Location Register for the relevant wireless network.
In
The service provider is typically given maintenance and configuration proprietary access to the database stored in the SHLR using an Operations and Maintenance Processor (OMP) and provisioning terminal console 1050, which may communicate with the SHLR using a point-to-point link, e.g., an X.25 link, an RS-232 link, or a TCP/IP link. Communications from the OMP 1050 typically relate to maintenance and configuration only, and do not relate to operational functions of the relevant wireless network.
A second wireless network 1070 servicing another wireless device 1090 includes another MSC 1020, and utilizes one or more STPs 1030 in the SS7network.
In the given scenario, assume that the wireless device 1090 in communication with the second wireless network 1070 is serviced by the service provider of the first wireless network 1060. Thus, presence and location information regarding the second wireless device 1090 is stored and updated in the SHLR 1040 corresponding to its servicing network.
To communicate presence and location information to the ‘home’ register of the second wireless device 1090, a MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) is sent in accordance with Signaling System #7 (SS7) standards using IS-41C protocol messages through the second wireless network 1070 to the MSC 1020 of the second wireless network 1070. The ‘presence’ of a wireless device relates to the wireless device being powered ON and reachable in the relevant wireless network.
The MSC 1020 forwards the MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) upon receipt to the STP 1030 as an IS-41 REGISTRATION NOTIFICATION (REGNOT) message (2.).
The STP 1030 forwards the REGNOT message (3.) to the appropriate SHLR 1040 servicing that particular wireless device 1090.
In this way, the Home Location Register of a particular wireless device 1040 is provided with presence and location information regarding the whereabouts and registration activity of a particular subscriber (e.g., wireless device 1090).
In particular, as shown in
In the conventional scenario, presence and location information is restricted to use by the ‘home’ service provider of a particular wireless device. Using conventional signaling protocols, other wireless networks are not provided with presence and location information regarding wireless devices other than those which subscribe to its services. The presence and location information is conventional used only by the home service provider for routing of call information (e.g., establishing a voice connection to a mobile wireless device).
Accordingly, there is a need for providing presence and location information to entities other than just those servicing a particular wireless device, thus enabling a new host of network services and applications.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, in a short message service center, a module for permitting automatic status tracking of a wireless chat participant by an application external to a service provider including said short message service center, a REGNOT and/or MSInactive handler comprises a registration notification and/or an MS inactivity messages receiver, and a registration/inactive message forwarder to forward a registration notification and/or MS inactivity message received by a mobile switching center over an Internet connection.
A method for automatically notifying an external chat server of a presence of a chat session participant in accordance with another aspect of the present invention comprises receiving an IS-41 conforming registration notification and MS inactive messages from one of a mobile telephony network, mobile switching center, I-HLR, and S-HLR or STP, and automatically forwarding the IS-41 conforming registration notification and MS inactive messages over an Internet connection to an external chat server.
Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description with reference to the drawings. Note that for simplicity of explanation, only a REGNOT message is shown in the figures. However, an MS inactivity (MSInactive) message may be conveyed in the same way as as the REGNOT message. In the drawings:
The present invention relates to a technique and apparatus to provide status tracking of presence and/or location of a mobile, wireless device to a requesting entity even outside of a particular wireless system. This allows wireless service providers the ability to monitor and log changes in the status of mobile stations within and/or outside their networks enabling the development of multiple applications and network services. Embodiments are disclosed wherein presence and/or location information is provided to entities outside of a particular servicing wireless network using the mechanisms of call processing components of a mobile network (e.g., call setup procedures), and using standard mechanisms currently available to any appropriately conforming Mobile Switching Center (MSC) element. An embodiment implementing a wireless chat automatic status tracking system and method is also disclosed.
Mobile presence and location are key concepts for location-based services and applications which require knowledge of mobile station/subscriber availability. Currently, conventional systems do not provide such wireless intelligent network (WIN) service for wireless devices.
It is important to note that existing systems and techniques have been conventionally located outside of a wireless network. As such, the existing systems have not been privy to, nor had the need to be privy to, triggers needed to obtain true mobile presence or location information.
Mobile Activity Status Tracker (MAST)
One series of disclosed embodiments relate to a software application package which tracks and reports status and activity of mobile wireless devices in a wireless network using mobile registration message, inactivity message forwarding, and/or mobile automatic notification of subscriber status to TCP/IP entities. This embodiment of a mobile activity status tracker is referred to herein as a Mobile Activity Status Tracker (MAST).
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, status changes that are recorded are sent via TCP/IP communications to other service provider-specific applications. The MAST system duplicates the same or similar information of a corresponding HLR, but is available as an external database entity which functions and communications are not restricted by SS7 standards.
Tracking in accordance with the principles of the present invention utilizes registration/de-registration activity of mobile stations. Utilizing status changes for a particular mobile station, key events can be noted regarding presence and/or location of the particular mobile station.
The MAST application offers entities (e.g., Internet and others) outside of a wireless infrastructure the ability to receive presence and/or location information regarding a particular mobile station to network entities outside of that which is servicing a particular wireless device. As disclosed, the MAST application has the ability to pull presence and/or location information or to push presence and/or location information to a requesting entity as desired.
Certain capabilities such as registration notification forwarding mechanisms/Registration Notification Forward Message and SMPP client which are basic to this application, are described in detail in two pending U.S. Applications by the same Assignee as the present case. In particular, an exemplary SMSC is described in co-pending and co-owned U.S. application . Ser. No. 09/322,929, entitled “Short Message Service Notification Between Multiple Short Message Service Centers”, filed Jun. 1, 1999, by Timothy J. Lorello and Reuben D. Hart, the entirety of which is explicitly incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, an exemplary Prepaid functionality and architecture is described in co-pending and co-owned U.S. application . Ser. No. 09/533,805, entitled “Prepaid Call Management In Intelligent Network”, filed Mar. 23, 2000, by Elizabeth Countryman, Timothy J. Lorello, Mark Titus, and Dara Ung, the entirety of which is explicitly incorporated herein by reference.
The Mobile Activity Status Tracker (MAST) is a Service Package Application (SPA) that allows wireless service providers to monitor and log changes in the status of mobile stations within their networks. The status changes that are recorded are sent via TCP/IP to other servers for service provider-specific applications. The tracking involves the registration/de-registration activity and location of the mobile stations. The tracking need not track call-specific information, e.g., called telephone numbers or information regarding conversations sustained by the tracked wireless subscribers.
Some disclosed embodiments relate to the use of a Home Location Register (HLR) which is integrated with a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) on a common platform, referred to herein as Integrated Home Location Registers (I-HLRs) commercially available from LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. in Murray Hill, N.J. Other embodiments relate to the use of a stand-alone HLR separate from the MSC platform, referred to herein as Stand alone HLR's (S-HLR). All types of HLRs are collectively referred to herein as an HLR.
The disclosed MAST SPA is implemented on an Advantage Service Control Point (SCP) Wireless Intelligent Network Platform, commercially available from LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. The SCP provides the required ANSI SS7 and TCP/IP protocol support and Service Circuit Handlers (SCH) for the MAST SPA.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the MAST SPA receives mobile activity notifications from an HLR, and forwards selected parameters upon request or configuration to servers external to the wireless network over a TCP/IP communication link (e.g., over the Internet or over an Intranet).
In particular, as shown in
(1) The handset exchanges activity information with the I-HLR, which in turn sends the Mobile Station Identity (MSID) of the mobile station and a set of relevant parameters to the MAST SPA in a registration notification forwarding mechanism message.
(2) The MAST SPA creates a temporary record for that mobile handset based on the MSID. The MAST performs a lookup in a database of existing records, using the MSID as a key. If there is no record for the MSID, then the temporary record is stored in the database. If there is a record for the same MSID, the MAST compares the temporary record with that found in the database to determine any changes in the activity status of the mobile station (or any other relevant parameters). If the activity status is the same (i.e., unchanged), the MAST overwrites the old record with the new one. On the other hand, if the activity status has changed, the activity status of the relevant mobile wireless device will be Notified or Forwarded to one or more application servers having access to the Internet using an appropriate TCP/IP interface and appropriate IP addresses (or other suitable protocol and communication path, e.g., SS7). To this end, the MAST SPA will forward a set of selected parameters (e.g., a subset of the parameters available in the temporary record) to one or more requesting or pre-configured applications servers using corresponding Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. The MAST then replaces the existing, older record with the new, updated record.
Preferably, the MAST resides on an SCP and accepts copies of IS-41 Registration Notification and MSInactive messages from the HLR(s).
In particular,
A second wireless network 1070 is shown for completeness and perspective. The second wireless network 1070 includes an MSC 1020, and services a wireless device 1090.
The MAST 200 provides presence and/or location information regarding any or all subscriber's of the first wireless network to external entities, without the need to change current communication standards, e.g., utilizing otherwise conventional SS7 and IS-41 communication messages.
The MAST 200 includes information similar to that contained in the SHLR, e.g., relating to the presence and/or location of serviced wireless devices. However, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, the MAST 200 may include additional information, and/or logged information over time with respect to each individual subscriber. The MAST 200 may be implemented on a same type platform as that implementing the SHLR 240, e.g., an SCP commercially available from LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Importantly, the MAST 200 includes a TCP/IP interface 270 and internal module 201 allowing appropriate operational access to subscriber presence and/or location information maintained therein. Thus, any or all external application servers 290 (e.g., chat servers, law enforcement servers, etc.) may access subscriber presence and or location information regarding a wireless service provider's subscribers via the Internet 280.
The subscriber's presence and/or location information maintained in a subscriber presence/location database 205 may be pre-configured for transmission to various pre-set application servers 290 via the TCP/IP (i.e., non-SS7 protocol) module 201 and associated link 270. Alternatively, presence and/or location information regarding any or all subscriber's serviced by the MAST 200 may be provided to an application server 290 upon request by the application server 290.
Referring back to
The message flow shown in
A MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) is transmitted by a relevant wireless device 1090 through the host wireless network #21070 to its MSC 1020. That MSC 1020 sends a MOBILE REGISTRATION NOTIFICATION (REGNOT) message (2.) to an STP 1030, which forwards a REGNOT message (3.) to the SHLR 240. Up to this point the message flow is as in the conventional system shown in
However, as shown in
The STP 230 forwards the REGNOT message (5.) from the SHLR to the MAST 200 using a REGNOT message (6.). Thus, the SHLR 240 shown in
In response to the REGNOT message (6.) received from the STP 1030, the MAST 200 updates its database 205 appropriately. The information contained in the database 205 is then made available as appropriate over the TCP/IP link 270 to an external device, e.g., using an Intranet or the Internet 280, e.g., to all requesters, to only some requesters paying a particular fee for such a service, etc.
The service provider 250 is given operational and maintenance access to the MAST 200 similarly to conventional access given to an SHLR, e.g., using an X.25, RS-232 or TCP/IP link.
In particular,
The I-HLR 340 shown in
In particular,
The REGNOT copy and forward function in the STP 430 copies the REGNOT message (2.) received from an MSC 1020, and forwards a REGNOT copy message (3b.) to the MAST 200. The STP 430 also sends the otherwise conventional REGNOT message (3.) to the SHLR 1040.
The STP 430 shown in
The MAST system architecture shown in
The service may be provided in a provisionless mode, and all the necessary subscriber information may reside on the HLR. Thus, there is preferably no specific subscriber provisioning necessary on the MAST SPA. Rather, the subscriber data may be maintained at the relevant HLR. The amount of memory, e.g., random access memory (RAM) and the number of SS7 links required by the SCP platform implementing the MAST SPA may be determined based on the subscriber count to be supported.
For instance, as a general guideline, consider the following example. Assuming a load of 500,000 subscribers, one (1) registration notification forwarding mechanism trigger per subscriber per hour, five (5) Mobile Inactivity Triggers (MITs) per subscriber per day, 1 KB of memory per subscriber, and an average SS7 message length of 100 octects, the number of SS7 links required in the disclosed embodiment for this configuration is approximately four (4), along with approximately 500 MB of RAM.
Use of Signaling Transfer Points (STPs) between MSCs can be implemented in multiple I-HLR environments as well.
From the perspective of a wireless service provider, MAST allows the implementation of an endless array of services and/or applications that can utilize presence and/or location information regarding a wireless device. Specific implementations of services will depend on the capabilities of the application servers that receive the information from the MAST. For instance, knowledge of registration activity in and of itself represents a huge benefit for the service provider from a marketing perspective because it can provide additional information regarding subscriber's habits, and general demographic data collection.
The MAST techniques and apparatus may also be used for law enforcement purposes. For instance, data relating to mobile station activity may be used, e.g., as evidence to build a legal case against an offender.
As another benefit, subscribers of a wireless service provider can be provided with an enhanced protection mechanism against fraud by allowing faster detection and/or tracking of delinquent mobile devices.
Depending upon particular parameters used, other services may be implemented. For instance, with knowledge of the location of a particular mobile station, a wireless service provider may implement an “Emergency Location” plan. Using such a service, mobile subscribers can have activity information (e.g., presence and/or location information, together with date and time) relating to the use of their mobile device transmitted to the MAST SPA in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The MAST SPA will log the presence and/or location information regarding relevant mobile subscribers served by the associated HRL, and pass the logged information on to any entity on the Internet or other entity or network, providing an accurate and up-to-date information source. Using the “Emergency Location” plan, the logged location information may be used by authorities to locate a person associated with that particular mobile device easier.
In particular, the REGNOT message parameters utilized by the MAST may be any or all parameters included or inferred from information within the standard REGNOT message shown in
Other information such as power level 506 can be used to infer and further refine the location information. For instance, a lower power level received by the wireless device 1090 (and/or higher power output by the wireless device 1090) may be used to infer a longer distance from the relevant cell site receiving transmissions from the wireless device 1090. Conversely, a higher power level might infer that the wireless device 1090 is closer to the cell site. Thus, a sort of ‘poor man's GPS’ can be provided to external entities regarding the location of a subscriber's wireless device.
In particular, a MOBILE SUBSCRIBER INACTIVE message follows the same paths as does the REGNOT messages shown in
The particular information contained either in the database 205 of the MAST and/or which is transmitted over the TCP/IP connection 270 and the Internet 280 may depend upon the particular applications operating on any of the application servers 290. Rudimentary information may include, e.g., an IP address of the application server 290, an ID of the relevant mobile wireless device, presence information such as a date and time of activity, and location information either real or inferred. Real information may include the cell site ID and/or sector ID. Inferred or extrapolated information may include, e.g., a delta distance corresponding to a power level of the wireless device's transmitter during a last contact.
For instance, as shown in
Alternatively, the presence and/or location information transmitted to a desiring application server 190 may relate to a group of subscribers having a common attribute (e.g., most active subscribers, least active subscribers, subscribers living in a particular region, etc.).
As disclosed, activity status information is tracked by the MAST as follows. Initially, the MAST receives a Mobile Registration message via a registration notification forwarding mechanism, alternatively referred to as a Registration Forward Message, from the relevant MSC/HLR (I-HLR or S-HLR), and appropriately updates the activity status in the database. Upon power down of the relevant wireless device, the MAST will receive a Mobile De-Registration message via a Mobile Inactive Trigger (MIT) from the relevant MSC/HLR, and appropriately updates the activity status in the database.
When a new message (e.g., a mobile registration message or mobile de-registration message) is received, the MAST application preferably parses the message, e.g., into up to 10 parameters, and stores the parsed message portions in an appropriate MSID ordered table.
In particular, as shown in step 202 of
If a record for the same MSID is found in the table of
In step 208, if the status (ACT to DEACT or DEACT TO ACT) or one of the key parameters are different from that of the previous record, a subset of key parameters up to and including all key parameters from this new record will be sent to at least one, but possibly multiple IP addresses on a network.
In steps 206 and 210, the old record is replaced in the MSID table with the new, most recent record.
The MAST receives information directly from the HLR or the STP (e.g., I-HLR or S-HLR), which has previously validated the MSID and determined the need to forward the information to the MAST.
Administration of the MAST may include, e.g., configuration and maintenance of the following:
There is preferably only one record per MSID in the MAST. The relevant service provider is preferably given access to the database stored in the MAST, e.g., through the conventional operational maintenance processor (OMP).
Due to its nature, the content of this database is likely to change rapidly over time, therefore the MAST database may provide only a snapshot of the activity status of all the relevant wireless devices at any given time.
The MAST preferably keeps a temporary log of the messages sent to the application services in a rotating file. This rotating file may have a configurably fixed size, and may overwrite itself with more recent information, e.g., after a desired period of time determined by the level of message traffic. This log provides a historical representation of the activity of specific wireless devices, or groups of wireless devices.
Reports may be generated for the relevant service provider, e.g., through the OMP or via a TCP/IP connection to the Internet. Possible reports can include, e.g., various information depending upon the parameters that the relevant HLR sends to the MAST, and/or specific needs and selections made by the particular service provider.
In case the subscriber base increases, the platform can be easily scaled to increase capacity.
Being a Wireless Intelligent Network service, MAST takes advantage of the improved reliability, scalability and performance of the Advantage Platform and the flexibility of the intelligent network approach.
Additionally, MAST is an Intelligent Network application that can be executed simultaneously on a single SCP platform, such as a Short Message Service Center, Over The Air Activation, PrePaid Wireless, etc. This fact spreads the cost of the platform over several services, thus allowing the service provider to price them in a competitive way. From an operating standpoint, a single platform is easier to manage resulting in reduced maintenance costs.
Mobile Chat Location Register (MCLR)
The principles of the present invention may be used to implement a wireless chat tracking system (i.e., Mobile Chat Location Register (MCLR)) which utilizes a change in mobile registration status to automatically notify a chat group system outside the wireless network of current status information activity regarding a relevant device, e.g., registration activity or inactivity timeout.
In a disclosed embodiment, a registration notification (REGNOT) message is either explicitly forwarded or copied to an external IP based application (e.g., to a mobile chat group system). The change in mobile registration is communicated via a suitable signaling link (e.g., SS7, TCP/IP, etc.) between a Home Location Register (HLR) and the chat group system. Therefore, instead of a conventionally closed system using SS7 messages, REGNOT messages are pushed out over TCP/IP connections to external applications (e.g., chat servers) to automatically notify the external system of the location of a particular user.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a REGNOT message may be simply forwarded in accordance with instructions from an HLR, or all REGNOT messages received may be copied and forwarded to an external application, which then sifts through the copied and received REGNOT messages for messages of relevance to that particular external application.
For the purposes of illustration, assume that in
Scenario 1
Automatic On-Line Notification Chat Scenario in a Prepaid Environment
(1) The handset Mobile A 1202, provisioned with chat service, is powered on or performs the IS-41 periodic or forced registration process. Thus, a Registration access message is sent from the Mobile A 1202 to the Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 1204.
(2) The MSC 1204 sends the IS-41 Registration Notification (REGNOT) message to the Home Location Register (HLR) 1206.
(3) Following the authentication process of Mobile A 1202, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, the HLR 1206 forwards the REGNOT message to, e.g., a relevant prepaid application server. This may be performed using an IS-41 REGNOT message over an SS7 network or an equivalent registration message over a TCP/IP network.
(4) The SMSC/Prepaid service 1230 may notify a suitable wireless Internet gateway 1210 that Mobile A 1202 is “on-line”. Such a suitable wireless Internet gateway 1210 is shown and described in co-pending U.S. appl. Ser. No. 09/630,762, entitled “Wireless Internet Gateway” to Smith, filed Aug. 2, 2000.
If Mobile A 1202 is a prepaid subscriber, the prepaid service may verify an account balance for Mobile A 1202 at this point and can decide to continue service or not.
(5) The wireless Internet gateway 1210 forwards the REGNOT message to a relevant external chat server 1220 automatically indicating to that external application that Mobile A 1202 is “on-line”.
(6) The external chat server 1220 determines that Mobile A 1202 belongs to a particular chat group, e.g., the chat group “Buddies” of the current example, and automatically registers Mobile A 1202 in the chat session.
(7) The external chat server 1220 notifies the other chat participants (e.g., the “Buddies” participants) that Mobile A 1202 is available by sending a broadcast text message to all current participants of that chat session. At the same time, the chat server 1220 may also notify Mobile A 1202 of all current participants of that chat session.
(8) The wireless Internet gateway 1210 automatically forwards chat messages from the chat server 1220 for delivery to the chat session participants via the relevant SMSC 1230.
(9) The short message service center (SMSC) 1230 requests the HLR 1206 for short message delivery to all participating mobile subscribers.
(10) The HLR 1206 provides the SMSC 1230 with all needed information to deliver the short messages.
(11) The SMSC 1230 stores and forwards the broadcast message to the MSC 1204 for delivery to the other chat participants (e.g., to Mobile B 1242 and Mobile C 1252), and the list of chat participants message to the automatically entering Mobile A 1202.
(12) The MSC 1204 delivers the chat messages to all participating mobiles 1202, 1242, 1252.
Scenario 2
Automatic Off-Line Notification Chat Scenario in a Prepaid Environment
(1) The handset Mobile A 1202, provisioned with chat service, is powered off or has moved out of the relevant coverage area.
(2) The MSC 1204 detects an expiration of an inactivity timer and sends an IS-41 Inactivity message to the Home Location Register (HLR) 1206.
(3) The HLR 1206 forwards the Inactivity message, e.g., the IS-41 MS Inactivity message, over an SS7 network, or an equivalent inactivity message over a TCP/IP network to, e.g., a relevant prepaid application server such as the SMSC/Prepaid platform 1230.
(4) The SMSC/Prepaid service 1230 notifies the wireless Internet gateway 1210 that Mobile A 1202 is “off-line”.
(5) The wireless Internet gateway 1210 forwards the message to the chat server 1220 that Mobile A 1202 is “off-line”.
(6) The external chat server 1220 determines that Mobile A 1202 belongs to, e.g., the chat group “Buddies”, and thus removes Mobile A 1202 from the chat session.
(7) The external chat server 1220 notifies the chat session participants, e.g., participants of the chat session “Buddies”, that Mobile A 1202 has become unavailable, by sending a broadcast text message to all current chat participants.
(8) The wireless Internet gateway 1210 forwards the messages for delivery.
(9) The SMSC 1230 requests the HLR 1206 for short message delivery to all mobile subscribers.
(10) The HLR 1206 provides the SMSC 1230 with all needed information to deliver the messages.
(11) The SMSC 1230 stores and forwards the broadcast message for delivery to Mobile wireless devices B & C, 1242 & 1252.
The MSC 1204 delivers the messages to Mobile wireless devices B & C, 1242 & 1252.
Note that while the chat server 1220 shown in
This solution may be integrated with existing, commercially available SMSC & web gateway products that enable wireless carriers & Internet service providers (ISPs) to offer, e.g., a pre-payment billing option for enhanced messaging services.
The principles of the present invention have applicability for usage with wireless intelligent network (WIN) applications, e.g., those already otherwise containing SMSC, prepaid, and/or web gateway applications. Moreover, there is applicability for usage with mobile registration, for inactivity message forwarding to a chat server, or for mobile automatic notification of subscriber status to chat server.
While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is related to and claims priority from co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/196,104, entitled “Mobile Activity Status Tracker” to Wallace et al., filed on Apr. 11, 2000; from co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/196,099, entitled “Wireless Chat Status Tracking” to Ung et al., filed on Apr. 11, 2000; and from co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/576,022, entitled “Mobile Activity Status Tracker” to Wallace et al., filed on May 23, 2000, the entirety of all three of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1103073 | O'Connel | Jul 1914 | A |
4494119 | Wimbush | Jan 1985 | A |
4651156 | Martinez | Mar 1987 | A |
4706275 | Kamil | Nov 1987 | A |
4891638 | Davis | Jan 1990 | A |
4891650 | Sheffer | Jan 1990 | A |
4952928 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5014206 | Scribner et al. | May 1991 | A |
5043736 | Darnell et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5055851 | Sheffer | Oct 1991 | A |
5068656 | Sutherland | Nov 1991 | A |
5068891 | Marshall | Nov 1991 | A |
5070329 | Jasinaki | Dec 1991 | A |
5081667 | Drori et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5119104 | Heller | Jun 1992 | A |
5144283 | Arens et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150113 | Bluthgen | Sep 1992 | A |
5161180 | Chavous | Nov 1992 | A |
5177478 | Wagai et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5193215 | Olmer | Mar 1993 | A |
5208756 | Song | May 1993 | A |
5214789 | George | May 1993 | A |
5218367 | Sheffer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223844 | Mansell et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235630 | Moody et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239570 | Koster et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243645 | Bissell et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5266944 | Carrol et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5289527 | Tiedemann, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293642 | Lo | Mar 1994 | A |
5299132 | Wortham | Mar 1994 | A |
5325302 | Izidon et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334974 | Simms et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343493 | Karimullah | Aug 1994 | A |
5347568 | Moody et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351235 | Lahtinen | Sep 1994 | A |
5361212 | Class et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363425 | Mufti et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374936 | Feng | Dec 1994 | A |
5379451 | Nakagoshi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381338 | Wysocki et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387993 | Heller et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5388147 | Grimes | Feb 1995 | A |
5390339 | Bruckert et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394158 | Chia | Feb 1995 | A |
5396227 | Carroll et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5398190 | Wortham | Mar 1995 | A |
5406614 | Hara | Apr 1995 | A |
5418537 | Bird | May 1995 | A |
5423076 | Westergreen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430759 | Yokev | Jul 1995 | A |
5432841 | Rimer | Jul 1995 | A |
5434789 | Fraker et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5446736 | Gleeson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454024 | Lebowitz | Sep 1995 | A |
5461390 | Hoshen | Oct 1995 | A |
5470233 | Fuchterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479408 | Will | Dec 1995 | A |
5479482 | Grimes | Dec 1995 | A |
5485161 | Vaughn | Jan 1996 | A |
5485163 | Singer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488563 | Chazelle et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497149 | Fast | Mar 1996 | A |
5508931 | Snider | Apr 1996 | A |
5513243 | Kage | Apr 1996 | A |
5515287 | Hakoyama et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519403 | Bickley et al. | May 1996 | A |
5532690 | Hertel | Jul 1996 | A |
5535434 | Siddoway et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539398 | Hall et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543776 | L'esperance et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552772 | Janky et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555286 | Tendler | Sep 1996 | A |
5568119 | Schipper et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574648 | Pilley | Nov 1996 | A |
5579372 | Astrom | Nov 1996 | A |
5588009 | Will | Dec 1996 | A |
5592535 | Klotz | Jan 1997 | A |
5604486 | Lauro et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606313 | Allen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606850 | Nakamura | Mar 1997 | A |
5610815 | Gudat et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614890 | Fox | Mar 1997 | A |
5615116 | Gudat et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621793 | Bednarak et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628051 | Salin | May 1997 | A |
5633912 | Tsoi | May 1997 | A |
5673306 | Amadon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673322 | Pepe et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682600 | Salin | Oct 1997 | A |
5692037 | Friend | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5740534 | Ayerst et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758088 | Bezaire et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761618 | Lynch et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767795 | Schaphorst | Jun 1998 | A |
5768509 | Gunluk | Jun 1998 | A |
5774533 | Patel | Jun 1998 | A |
5787357 | Salin | Jul 1998 | A |
5793859 | Mathews | Aug 1998 | A |
5794142 | Vanttila et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797091 | Clise et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797094 | Houde et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797096 | Lupien et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802492 | DeLorme et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806000 | Vo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822700 | Hult et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825283 | Camhi | Oct 1998 | A |
5828740 | Khuc et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5903726 | Donovan | May 1999 | A |
5905736 | Rohen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920821 | Seazholtz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930701 | Skog | Jul 1999 | A |
5940756 | Sibecas | Aug 1999 | A |
5943399 | Bannister et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946629 | Sawyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946630 | Willars et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949326 | Wicks et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950130 | Coursey | Sep 1999 | A |
5953398 | Hill | Sep 1999 | A |
5959543 | LaPorta | Sep 1999 | A |
5960074 | Clark | Sep 1999 | A |
5966663 | Gleason | Oct 1999 | A |
5970059 | Ahopelto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974054 | Couts et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974133 | Fleischer | Oct 1999 | A |
5978685 | Laiho | Nov 1999 | A |
5987323 | Huotari | Nov 1999 | A |
5999811 | Molne | Dec 1999 | A |
6021333 | Anderson | Feb 2000 | A |
6035025 | Hanson | Mar 2000 | A |
6049710 | Nilsson | Apr 2000 | A |
6058300 | Hanson | May 2000 | A |
6064875 | Morgan | May 2000 | A |
6070067 | Nguyen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073004 | Balachandran | Jun 2000 | A |
6073015 | Berggren et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075982 | Donovan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078583 | Takahara | Jun 2000 | A |
6081508 | West et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094574 | Vance | Jul 2000 | A |
6101378 | Barabash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122503 | Daly | Sep 2000 | A |
6122520 | Want et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes | Oct 2000 | A |
6138158 | Boyle et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144653 | Persson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148197 | Bridges et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148198 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149353 | Nilsson | Nov 2000 | A |
6169891 | Gorham et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173181 | Losh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178331 | Holmes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181935 | Gossman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185602 | Bayrakeri | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189031 | Badger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195543 | Granberg | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195651 | Handel | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198431 | Gibson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199045 | Giniger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205330 | Winbladh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208854 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208870 | Lorello et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216008 | Lee | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223042 | Raffel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223046 | Hamill-Keays et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226529 | Bruno et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246879 | Segura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249680 | Wax et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249744 | Morita | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263212 | Ross | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263372 | Hogan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266614 | Alumbaugh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289373 | Dezonno | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304564 | Monin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304898 | Shiigi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310892 | Olkin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311055 | Boltz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314108 | Ramasubramani et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317594 | Gossman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321257 | Kotola et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327479 | Mikkola | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330600 | Matchefts et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353614 | Borella et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366663 | Bauer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366961 | Subbiah | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370373 | Gerth et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381535 | Durocher et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389421 | Hawkins et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389455 | Fuisz | May 2002 | B1 |
6393014 | Daly | May 2002 | B1 |
6393461 | Okada | May 2002 | B1 |
6396913 | Perkins, III | May 2002 | B1 |
6397054 | Hoirup et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405236 | Nierataschker | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408177 | Parikh | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424841 | Gustafsson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442589 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456852 | Bar et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459892 | Burgan | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463145 | O'Neal et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490450 | Batni et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493558 | Bernhart | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499053 | Marquette et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502086 | Pratt | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507589 | Ramasubramani et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512930 | Sandegren | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6526335 | Treyz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529732 | Vainiomaki et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538561 | Angus | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542993 | Erfani | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560456 | Lohtia et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587688 | Chambers et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6587691 | Granstam et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591304 | Sitaraman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609004 | Morse | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621810 | Leung | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628965 | LaRosa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654786 | Fox et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662015 | Furlong | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667688 | Menard et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671356 | Lewis | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674767 | Kadyk | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6711411 | Ruffini | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6718384 | Linzy | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721779 | Maffeis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721872 | Dunlop et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725268 | Jackel | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728353 | Espejo et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728635 | Hamada | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744764 | Biddeliazari | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757708 | Craig et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771971 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778099 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779022 | Hortsmann et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785261 | Schuster | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785659 | Landsman | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6868074 | Hanson | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874018 | Wu | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886017 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6961330 | Cattan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970869 | Slaughter et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6993325 | Waesterlid | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7047300 | Oehrke | May 2006 | B1 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7116972 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130383 | Naidoo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133403 | Mo | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7180415 | Banker et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7245216 | Burkley | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7317705 | Hanson | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7392038 | Ratschunas | Jun 2008 | B1 |
20010031641 | Ung | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032267 | Collison | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041579 | Smith et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020052968 | Bonefas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091789 | Katariya et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098851 | Walczak | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116263 | Gouge | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118800 | Martinez | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119793 | Hronek et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133568 | Smith | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168986 | Lau et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030017832 | Anderson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055912 | Martin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060212 | Thomas | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030086422 | Klinker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119525 | Rajkotia | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120826 | Shay | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040103431 | Davenport et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040110524 | Takano et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040199614 | Shenfield et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203900 | Cedervall et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259531 | Wood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050020287 | Pohutsky | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050048948 | Holland | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050135569 | Dickinson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050277432 | Viana et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282518 | D'Evelyn | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060109960 | D'Evelyn | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116138 | Simsek et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148415 | Hamalainen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183460 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225090 | Shim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 308 528 | Dec 1995 | GB |
10307782 | Nov 1998 | JP |
PCTSE9702081 | Dec 1997 | WO |
PCTSE9800992 | May 1998 | WO |
PCTSE9900875 | May 1999 | WO |
PCTFI9900935 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20010031641 A1 | Oct 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60196104 | Apr 2000 | US | |
60196099 | Apr 2000 | US |