The present disclosure relates to transmission of data, and more particularly to the wireless transmission of data between a rotating frame of reference and a fixed frame of reference.
The transmission of data between a rotating frame of reference and a fixed frame of reference is typically accommodated through an electrical slip ring. Unique demands are particularly placed on slip ring technology in aerospace applications such as that between a rotor system and an airframe of a rotary-wing aircraft because of equipment requirements and environmental conditions. Such demands are further intensified by the continued desire to transmit more data at higher reliability to, for example, transmit flight control and blade position data.
Wireless transmission of data may be effective, however, the reliability of wireless transmission may be complicated by arbitrary electromagnetic interference (EMI) typical in the operational environment of aircraft. Further, wireless transmissions may result in emission of detectable radiation which may compromise the aircraft.
A communication system according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes a first communication module within a rotating frame of reference and a second communication module within a fixed frame of reference. The first communication module and the second communication module in wireless communication at least partially through a hollow shaft.
A method of communication according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes wireless communication between a rotating frame of reference and a fixed frame of reference at a frequency above a waveguide cutoff frequency define by a hollow shaft within the rotating frame of reference.
Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
Referring to
It should be understood that although the main rotor shaft 28 is illustrated in the disclosed non-limiting embodiment as a free space waveguide which provides for wireless communication between a rotating frame of reference R and a fixed frame of reference F, any hollow shaft type structure such as the tail rotor shaft 18T (
Referring to
The communication module 30A within the rotating frame of reference R may be located adjacent the hub 26 (
The main rotor shaft 28 may be sealed at the upper section 28U by a conductive cover 34 that has provisions for the antenna 32A without compromise of the RF integrity of the main rotor shaft 28. The conductive cover 34 prevents radiation from escaping into the environment so as to maintain a covert system and prevents radiation from the external environment from interference with transmission/reception of the communication system 30 as well as prevent external jamming thereof. The main rotor shaft 28 operates as a free space electromagnetic waveguide to facilitate wireless communication therein above a cutoff frequency (Fco) without interference from EMI or emission of detectable radiation. The main rotor shaft 28 is defacto a Faraday cage.
The cutoff frequency (Fco) of an electromagnetic waveguide is the lowest frequency for which a mode will propagate. Consequently, a waveguide below the cutoff frequency will result in high levels of attenuation for frequencies below the Fco.
The lowest Fco for a rectangular waveguide and a circular waveguide is given by the following equations:
Rectangular:
Circular:
where:
W=width in inches; and
D=diameter in inches
Below the Fco, the attenuation per unit length (inches) at any frequency (F) is given by:
AUL(dB/in.)=0.00463F√{square root over (((Fco/F)2−1))} [3]
where:
AUL=attenuation per unit length
F is in MHz
Although this equation provides the attenuation per unit length, the designer using these relationships should strive for at least a 3:1 length-to-width (L/W) or diameter ratio as generally disclosed in
√{square root over (((Fco/F)2−1))} [4]
approaches (Fco/F). The attenuation per unit length can thus be approximated as:
AUL(dB/in.)=0.00463Fco [5]
After substituting the appropriate Fco for the rectangular and circular waveguide, the attenuation per unit length reduces to:
Rectangular:
Circular:
where:
W=width in inches; and
D=diameter in inches.
The main rotor shaft 28 may be highly reflective internally and possibly resonant at the frequencies of interest for the communication modules 30A, 30B. The placement of antennas 32A, 32B may thereby be optimized for maximum signal to noise and, because of the waveguide effects provided by the main rotor shaft 28, the RF path loss will be approximately linear with distance rather than the inverse square.
The main rotor shaft 28 will typically have an inner diameter 28D which is not of a constant inside diameter (
Optimized performance may be achieved, for example, through testing, modeling and measurement or other direct analysis of the main rotor shaft 28. Alternatively, the optimized performance may be achieved through Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM). OFDM provides for digital modulation in which a signal is split into several narrowband channels at different frequencies to minimize any interference in an essentially active manner.
Dependant at least in part on the design of the antenna 32A, 32B and details of the surrounding main rotor shaft 28 structures, there will likely be signal strength modulation from the respective motion of the antennas 32A, 32B due to the spatial response pattern and multipath therebetween. This may be problematic for some modulation techniques, e.g., amplitude modulation (AM), but less so for others, e.g., frequency modulation (FM). Regardless of AM or FM, the signal strength modulation will change the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and may affect the probability of bit error. Once this is understood, a number of techniques may be employed to mitigate the probability of bit error. One technique is the usage of enough power so that the SNR is always adequate. Another technique is error correcting codes (ECC) to detect and correct any errors. Both of these approaches depend on selecting a priori design limits. Another, approach is to synchronize the communication to the rotation rate for the main rotor shaft 28 and only communicate when good SNR occurs. The synchronization may be determined analytically, but need not be. Furthermore, instead of a function of shaft angle, synchronization may be determined experimentally. It should be understood that any combination of these techniques may alternatively or additionally be utilized such that, for example only, adequate power, ECC, and synchronization may be utilized in combination.
In one non-limiting embodiment, power for the communication module 30A in the rotating frame of reference R may be provided by a battery. Optimization of the antenna pattern and matching network will facilitate efficient power usage and thereby increases battery life. Alternatively, power generation in the rotating frame of reference R may be provided by the rotation of the main rotor shaft 28 which operates as a rotor of an electrical generator to power the communication module 30A within the rotating frame of reference R.
The main rotor shaft 28 operates as a waveguide for wireless signals of sufficiently high frequency above the waveguide cutoff frequency which, for a main rotor shaft 28 inside diameter of about 1.4 inches (3.5 cm) may be on the order of 5-6 GHz.
While the embodiment schematically illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It should be understood that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3390393 | Upton | Jun 1968 | A |
3681714 | Terakawa | Aug 1972 | A |
3701157 | Uhrig | Oct 1972 | A |
3896446 | Kondoh | Jul 1975 | A |
3972491 | Ferris et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4524620 | Wright et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
5614907 | Kreitmair-Steck et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
6171056 | Lorber | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196796 | Lozyniak et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200096 | Kohlhepp | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6295006 | Kohlhepp | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6322324 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354536 | Torok et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6453669 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6559805 | Yamauchi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6671622 | McCall et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6693548 | Boyce et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6714135 | Froman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6908286 | Leskow et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941817 | King et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950073 | Clymer et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968508 | Lucaci et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7086834 | LeMieux | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090178 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103460 | Breed | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7148773 | Lohr | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7324016 | Milgram | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7355302 | Stonestreet, II et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7403166 | Clymer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421321 | Breed et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437264 | Pierce et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444210 | Breed et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7473077 | Gaffiero et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20040229478 | Chen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050067527 | Petersen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20080136565 | Paynter | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090325628 | Becker | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4328573 | Mar 1995 | DE |
0067355 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0211231 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fiber Optic Rotary Joints, Moog Components Group, 2006. |
European Search Report, dated May 4, 2010, EP Application No. 10 15 4558.0-2220. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100216398 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |