The present invention relates to hygiene dispenser systems and for monitoring hygiene compliance data by users of such systems, and more particularly to a communication system for wirelessly transmitting dispenser status data from the dispensers to a central station, including a cellular telephone network.
Hygiene compliance systems collect hygiene compliance data collected by sensors at a hygiene dispenser system. The data is typically stored locally at the hygiene dispenser. The data may be transmitted over a communications line which may be a hard-wire, such as a half-duplex RS-485 network to a central location, which may receive data from a plurality of hygiene dispensers. The data may be analyzed at the central location, and hygiene compliance reports may be generated with a view towards insuring compliance with hygiene protocols and regulations, and to improve compliance when compliance has been found to be lacking, not optimal, or in need of improvement in some way.
In some hygiene compliance systems, the hygiene data is transferred over a local network at a customer site to a monitoring station which collects and analyses the information.
Sometimes a different entity, other than the customer, collects and analyzes the data, but the data is still transferred over the customer-owned or -operated network. This may result in security issues, as the different entity doing the monitoring, should not, from the customer's perspective, have access to the entire network which includes data other than hygiene monitoring data. Also, the different entity doing the monitoring may be monitoring with a proprietary data protocol or other proprietary software application, which the different entity wishes to keep confidential from the customer.
If data is communicated over a data cable between the dispensers and a data collection device, the data cable may be expensive to install, especially for retro-fit applications. If the data collection device is a personal computer (“PC”) which runs a proprietary application program at a different entity, both the customer and different entity can develop a strained relationship. If the customer opens a port in the customer's network firewall, security concerns are raised, subjecting the customer to possible security breaches by not only the different entity, but from other entities as well, seeking to hack into the customer's system through the firewall.
The present invention provides a communication arrangement which addresses some, or all, of the above concerns about cost, retro-fitting, security, and maintaining good relationships between the customer and different entity performing the data collection and compliance monitoring.
The present invention provides a reliable and cost-effective, low band-width wireless network that can be easily installed either initially, or retro-fitted in an indoor environment, and that is capable of communicating hygiene dispenser status data to an off-site location, while also minimizing the burden on the customer and the customer's personnel, and existing on-site customer's network infrastructure.
A preferred embodiment according to the invention will be described, but the invention is not limited to this embodiment.
The sensors may be embedded in the dispensers and may detect, and then transmit, or broadcast, data representing each dispenser activation and hygiene compliance event. Hubs H, located within reception range of a plurality of sensors, will receive the transmitted data and re-transmit the data to a gateway G, servicing a plurality of hubs H. The gateway G will then transmit the data over a cellular network CN to a remote server RS with database store. The remote server RS can be connected to the internet, and remote users RU can log onto the remote server RS with appropriate password over the internet, and retrieve the remote dispenser activation event data for processing and analysis, such as generating hygiene compliance reports.
The transmission range of the sensors S may be on the order of 50 feet, or more, to ensure that respective hub H can receive the transmitted data. The transmission of the hub H will preferably have a longer range of 100 feet or more to ensure that the gateway G will receive the transmitted data from the hubs H.
The above-described topology will provide a network at good-performance and low-cost, avoiding hand-wiring of both original and retro-fit installations.
Hubs H can be located throughout a customer facility. In addition to receiving data from sensors S, and transmitting to a gateway G, the hubs H can also, or alternatively, function as repeaters, relaying data from one hub to another to the gateway G. Good radio frequency (RF) coverage will thus be obtained, while allowing the sensors to operate at low-power levels, thereby extending battery life. By having the hubs H, which are less costly than a gateway G, serve as repeaters, savings can result by having only one gateway G at a facility, although it may be useful to have a plurality of gateways G for redundancy in case of a failure of a gateway G. Hubs H can also be provided with ranges in an over-lapping manner, so that even if a hub H becomes inoperative or loses power, the remaining hubs H can provide the transmission and repeating operations.
The gateway G uses a cellular modem to transmit the data over a cellular network. As cellular modems are relatively costly to acquire and operate, minimizing the cellular modem count to a low number, even one, will minimize installation and operating costs.
The sensor S and hubs H may operate on 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz bands, but preferably will operate at 433 MHz to avoid interference with the former two bands which are popular and crowded. Also, the 433 MHz band is better able to penetrate obstacles, like walls. As other less crowded frequency bands become available, they may be used as well. Spread spectrum transmission may be used to reduce noise and/or interference.
Each sensor S is preferably self-powered with a battery so that it can be used with existing manual and touch-free dispensers, which do not presently have power available to power the sensor. The sensor S, especially for a manual dispenser, may have a mechanical interface such as a contact closure, magnetic reed switch, or Hall-effect sensor. The preferred interface is the contact closure as this is the most reliable.
The dispensers preferably have an “expansion port”. The expansion port may have an active low 3.3V logic level pin available with a 100 KΩ pull-up resistor. This pin goes active during the dispenser pump cycle which is about one second in duration. However, the manual dispenser's activation could be much shorter. To make the sensor compatible with both the manual and touch-free dispensers, the 100 KΩ pull-up resistor may be removed from the touch-free dispenser. The sensor will have a 100 KΩ pull-up resistor which makes the contact closure interface self-contained and eliminates the need to add a pull-up resistor and Vcc source to the manual dispenser.
The manual dispenser is different from the touch-free because it is completely under user control. The sensor should be able to detect an activation event with a minimum duration of 100 ms. A user may not fully depress the push bar or push it very quickly causing the limit switch (contact closure) to only be closed for a short period of time. The sensor may be designed to detect up to 100 consecutive activation events in rapid succession. It is not uncommon for users to take multiple doses very rapidly. The sensor should be able to buffer up to 100 consecutive activation events in rapid succession also buffering a time offset, for each activation, based on the first activation in a rapid succession series (see Table 1). Buffering will also be preferred if one or more activations occur while the sensor is transmitting. The time offset will allow the hub to recognize the buffered activations as valid. The time offset can be added, by the hub, to the time stamp of the first activation thus resolving the time of activation for the buffered event. The time stamp will have a resolution of 1 second so it is possible that more than one valid activation will have the same time stamp. When the buffer is empty, the time offset will be cleared to 0.
Some sensors may be within range of more than one hub. This will result in multiple hubs collecting activation event data from one sensor. The remote server can detect and discard duplicate activation events before storing them in a database. More than one activation can have the same time stamp from the same sensor. To allow the server to distinguish between valid activations with the same time stamp and duplicate activations with the same time stamp, an 8-bit counter (see table 1) can be incremented with each activation. If the server sees two activations with the same time stamp from the same sensor but different counts, both activations are valid, otherwise one is a duplicate and can be discarded.
Multiple hubs may not have perfectly synchronized real-time clocks (RTC). In the case where two or more of these out of sync hubs are within range of a single sensor, each may record and time stamp the same activation event but the time stamps will not match. This creates a situation that makes it difficult for the remote server to detect duplicate activations unless an 8-bit activation count is implemented by the sensor.
The sensor will create an 8-byte event record for each activation that occurs (see Table 2). This record will be transmitted to the nearest hub. The event record will contain a factory programmed 32-bit device address that is unique to the sensor, an 8-bit device ID that will distinguish the current sensor from other sensors designed in the future, an 8-bit event ID to identify what kind of event occurred, an 8-bit activation count to identify duplicate event records and an 8-bit time offset to resolve activation time for multiple events occurring before they can be transmitted.
The Address Bytes 0-3 may have a factory-programmed value between 0 and 4,294,967,296 that is unique for each sensor
The Device ID may have a value from 0 to 255 that identifies the type of sensor from which the event record originated. The value for the current sensor (type 1) will be 0.
The Event ID may have a value from 0 to 255 that identifies the type of event that occurred. The current sensor (type 1) only has one event, a contact closure (dispenser activation). Sensors may have more event options such as cover open, cover closed, low battery, object blocking dispenser's IR etc. The value for a dispenser activation event will be 0.
The 8-Bit Activation Count may have a value between 0 and 255 that is incremented with each activation event. Consecutive activation events should not have the same number. When the count reaches 255, it will circle back to 0 on the following activation.
The Time Offset may have a value from 0 to 255 that, for the current activation, represents the amount of time that has passed since the first previous activation that has not yet been transmitted. The time offset value may be in 100 ms intervals i.e. 0=0 ms, 1=100 ms, 2=200 ms etc. It is possible to compress several of the above bytes into 4-bit upper and lower nibbles if the power budget requires it.
An alternative to the above-described sensors S will now be described.
A header on the dispenser's PCB may be available with power and an I2C or similar interface for an embedded sensor which would be mounted directly to the dispenser's PCB. By having a communication interface directly to the dispenser's μC, the sensor may be able to transmit not only an activation event but also low battery level, cover opened, cover closed and IR obstruction events. Dispenser configuration information such as dose setting (1, 2, 3), IR range (long, short), battery level, etc. could also be transmitted at the request of a remote user. This information could be used to remotely monitor the health and configuration of a customer's dispenser. For example, the remote server could be configured, by a remote user, to generate a warning email that would automatically be sent to a customer with a list of individual dispensers that have low batteries allowing the customer to preempt dispenser failure.
The sensor may have more communication demands made of it than the first-described sensor, and therefore, will likely consume more power. An external power source may be necessary. This means that the sensor will only be used with the touch-free dispenser and use the dispenser's D-cell batteries as its power source.
The function of the hub H is to receive, time-date stamp and buffer activation data (event records) transmitted from the surrounding sensors within its range. It then passes this data along to the nearest hub or gateway when it is requested.
The hub H should preferably be able to receive transmitted data from sensors a minimum of 50 feet away in an indoor environment. Indoor range is a subjective term so it will be assumed that the signal will only pass through a maximum of two interior walls composed of drywall and metal studs or that the signal will only pass through one exterior wall, firewall, or floor, composed of formed concrete with embedded rebar.
The hub H should preferably be able to process up to 100 sensors and up to 20 sensors transmitting activation events at the same time. A hub typically processes one event at a time so a maximum time-date stamp latency of 10 seconds may be used. This should allow enough time for each individual sensor event to be processed by the hub
Each hub may be equipped with a battery backed real-time clock (RTC) with a minimum accuracy of +/−5 ppm. The gateway should attempt to update each hub's RTC at least once every 24 hours to keep all hubs synchronized. When a sensor's activation event is received, the hub will do the following: (1) log the event record; (2) log the current time of the RTC to create a time-date stamp for the event; (3) check the event record's time offset byte; (4) if time offset byte is not equal to 0, adjust time-date stamp accordingly; and (5) buffer event record with time-date stamp in circular queue. Some MSP430 μCs have a built-in RTC. This would eliminate the need for the hub to deal with time offset and keep things simple.
A circular queue may be used to buffer the last 10,000 activation events for all sensors within the hub's range. The queue will also serve as a local archive so that the remote server can request past events that may have been lost or corrupted. When the queue is full, new events will overwrite the oldest buffered events.
The hub may also function as a repeater. This wireless topology attempts to minimize the number of gateways required to send data to a remote server. To do so, hubs that are out of the gateway's range will transmit and receive data from hubs that are within their range. In turn, these hubs will transmit and receive data from hubs within their range until the data finally reaches a gateway. This forwarding of data from one hub to another will form a simple ad hoc or mesh type of network. Each hub may be able to transmit to and receive data from other hubs or a gateway a minimum of 100 feet away in an indoor environment. The signal may pass through a maximum of two interior walls composed of drywall and metal studs. It will also be assumed that the signal may only pass through one exterior wall, firewall, or floor composed of formed concrete with embedded rebar. External power may be required due to the large distance and communication demands placed on the hub. The hub may be powered from an external 6 VDC to 12 VDC source such as a class 2 transformer.
When activation event data is requested by the gateway, the hub will send the event record as in Table 3:
The data in Table 3 may be in binary form using a proprietary protocol. This would make the data sufficiently difficult to decipher and eliminate the need for encryption. It is possible to compress the time-date stamp data but it is being presented in its current form to make parsing easier. Hub device ID, sensor event ID and sensor device ID may be included.
Hub installation is preferably as simple as possible. One should determine what sensors, hubs, or gateways are within range. An installer should preferably have a laptop PC available during installation. This will allow the use of a software tool that can be used to configure the hub (if necessary) and determine what devices are within range. The hub will have a half-duplex RS-485 serial port that will allow connection to the installer's PC.
The hub may be able to “discover” what other devices are within range without the need for the installer to intervene. This would be possible because each device will have a unique device ID and address combination. Discovery needs to occur within a reasonable amount of time because installers will charge by the hour.
The device may use a custom sheet metal enclosure or an ABS enclosure. Depending on size, mounting holes will be available in the PCB for fasteners. All connectors are preferably mounted at the PCB's edge for access through enclosure. Enclosure may be made of 1.5 mm steel or aluminum, with 2.50 mm from edge of PCB to outside surface of enclosure for connector placement. A right angle PCB mount SMA connector could be used so the antenna can be attached to the hub by the installer.
If the dispenser is empty, a user may try to simulate a dispensing of hygiene product by standing in front of the dispenser so that his presence and identity is sensed, even though the user will not cleanse his hands. To address this potential problem, the dispenser has a button which can be pressed by a user to signal that the dispenser is empty of hygiene product, or in need of other service such as maintenance (e.g., cleaning) or repair. In addition, or in the alternative, the dispenser can have a sensor which can detect when the dispenser is empty of hygiene product, the amount of hygiene product remaining, or maintenance or repair service.
The reading of the button and/or sensors can be transmitted to a local server, remote server, offsite server or the like. The information can be transmitted, if necessary, through one or more hubs, through the gateway and then over the cellular network. The system can thus monitor the amount of hygiene product remaining, and when a dispenser needs to be filled, as well as any needed maintenance or repair. By tracking consumption, the system can provide predicted “run-out” times, and generate messages for dispensers to be refilled, the dispenser can be reset, or the capacity sensor will sense that the dispenser is filled.
The information sent would include the dispenser's address (location), time, date and a flag indicating that the dispenser is empty, the amount of hygiene product remaining, and the current operative “status” including operation OK, or need for maintenance or repair. The system can periodically “poll” the dispensers to request the status of each dispenser and how much hygiene product is remaining.
When a user presses a button, the dispenser will send a message, which could be over a 433 MHz wireless network, with the dispenser's address, time, date and flag indicating “dispenser empty” or other operative status. When the message reaches the offsite server, after being transmitted through the hub and gateway, the server will process the message and send an alert to appropriate personnel by email, SMS text message, phone message and/or other method of communication. The alert can be configured to display on a web-based software graphic user interface.
The offsite server is configured at setup/installation with the various locations of each of the dispenser addresses. This will allow the appropriate personnel receiving the alert to know the physical location of the dispenser that needs a refill or other service, as well as the time and date that it was reported to need refilling or service.
As mentioned previously, one or more sensors in the dispenser could be provided to detect the amount of hygiene product remaining in the dispenser, and the sensors could automatically transmit the information to the server. The transmission could be at a periodic time interval, or when the product reaches certain quantity amounts remaining, such as ½, ¼, etc., or 10 oz., 5 oz., etc. A program in the sensor could also track consumption rates of each dispenser, and be used to track the consumption rate at that dispenser and predict the time when the dispenser should be refilled before it gets completely empty, or other routine service such as cleaning, battery replacement, etc.
Although a preferred embodiment has been described, the invention is not limited to this embodiment and the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/164,930, filed on Jan. 27, 2014, entitled, “WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FOR DISPENSER BEACONS” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/756,791 filed Jan. 25, 2013, which is incorporated by reference herein. This application also incorporates by reference U.S. Ser. No. 61/437,466 filed Jan. 28, 2011, U.S. Ser. No. 61/486,491 filed May 16, 2011, U.S. Ser. No. 13/215,823 filed Aug. 23, 2011 and U.S. Ser. No. 13/612,095 filed Sep. 12, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3736584 | Hackett et al. | May 1973 | A |
3761909 | Schweitzer et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3786467 | Cotter | Jan 1974 | A |
3801977 | Cotter | Apr 1974 | A |
3866198 | Cohen | Feb 1975 | A |
3961321 | Moss | Jun 1976 | A |
3986182 | Hackett | Oct 1976 | A |
4076146 | Lausberg et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4083298 | Schotten | Apr 1978 | A |
4117462 | Miller | Sep 1978 | A |
4198618 | Kleinschmidt | Apr 1980 | A |
4209776 | Frederick | Jun 1980 | A |
4275390 | Heywang et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4319349 | Hackett | Mar 1982 | A |
4360905 | Hackett | Nov 1982 | A |
4380726 | Sado et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4486910 | Saalmann et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4539846 | Grossman | Sep 1985 | A |
4590460 | Abbott et al. | May 1986 | A |
4606085 | Davies | Aug 1986 | A |
4644509 | Kiewit et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4688585 | Vetter | Aug 1987 | A |
4727522 | Steiner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729120 | Steiner et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4839597 | Rowland | Jun 1989 | A |
4896144 | Bogstad | Jan 1990 | A |
4987402 | Nykerk | Jan 1991 | A |
4991146 | Ransdell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5083298 | Citterio et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5110364 | Mazur et al. | May 1992 | A |
5150099 | Lienau | Sep 1992 | A |
5153520 | Dumbeck | Oct 1992 | A |
5202666 | Knippscheer | Apr 1993 | A |
5245317 | Chidley et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263006 | Hermesmeyer | Nov 1993 | A |
5309409 | Jones et al. | May 1994 | A |
5370267 | Schroeder | Dec 1994 | A |
5390385 | Beldham | Feb 1995 | A |
5430293 | Sato et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5463595 | Rodhall et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467481 | Srivastava | Nov 1995 | A |
5570079 | Dockery | Oct 1996 | A |
5610589 | Evans et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625659 | Sears | Apr 1997 | A |
5661471 | Kotlicki | Aug 1997 | A |
5684458 | Calvarese | Nov 1997 | A |
5687717 | Halpern et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695091 | Winings et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5731526 | Kindrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5764136 | Harron | Jun 1998 | A |
5765605 | Waymire et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771925 | Lewandowski | Jun 1998 | A |
D396009 | Reubens | Jul 1998 | S |
H1743 | Graves et al. | Aug 1998 | H |
5793653 | Segal | Aug 1998 | A |
5812059 | Shaw et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5887145 | Harari et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900067 | Jones | May 1999 | A |
5913915 | McQuinn | Jun 1999 | A |
5917425 | Crimmins et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939974 | Heagle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945910 | Gorra | Aug 1999 | A |
5952924 | Evans et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954069 | Foster | Sep 1999 | A |
5966753 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977913 | Christ | Nov 1999 | A |
5979703 | Nystrom | Nov 1999 | A |
5987105 | Jenkins et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012041 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031461 | Lynn | Feb 2000 | A |
6038331 | Johnson | Mar 2000 | A |
6065639 | Maddox et al. | May 2000 | A |
6125482 | Foster | Oct 2000 | A |
6130607 | McClanahan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147607 | Lynn | Nov 2000 | A |
6175308 | Tallman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191693 | Sangsingkeow | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211788 | Lynn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213424 | Helfer-Grand | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236317 | Cohen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236953 | Segal | May 2001 | B1 |
6259956 | Myers et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278372 | Velasco, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279777 | Goodin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288641 | Casais | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314282 | Weber et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331964 | Barone | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347724 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351223 | DeWeerd et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360181 | Gemmell et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368420 | Angevaare et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375038 | Daansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392546 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6404837 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417773 | Vlahos et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426701 | Levy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6476385 | Albert | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485979 | Kippenhan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6523193 | Saraya | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524390 | Jones | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6577240 | Armstrong | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611207 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6681003 | Linder et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707873 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727818 | Wildman et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730024 | Freyre et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749148 | Helfer-Grand | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759959 | Wildman | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778092 | Braune | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781523 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792395 | Roberts | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799085 | Crisp, III | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807460 | Black et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6882278 | Winings et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882315 | Richley et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883563 | Smith | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893321 | Buchanan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897780 | Ulrich et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917290 | Land | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919567 | Iwasawa | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6950683 | Hunt | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6956498 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6975231 | Lane et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977588 | Schotz et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015816 | Wildman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023341 | Stilp | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7023356 | Burkhardt et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042361 | Kazdin et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056050 | Sacks | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067054 | Fritze | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069188 | Roberts | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7075412 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7099781 | Heidl et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7099856 | Barangan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117374 | Hill et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119688 | Wildman | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119692 | Leiffort et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142108 | Diener et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154397 | Zerhusen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157045 | McVey | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187287 | Ryal | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191090 | Cunningham | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7201005 | Voglewede et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202780 | Teller | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7236097 | Cunningham | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7242306 | Wildman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7242307 | LeBlond | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7248933 | Wildman | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7265673 | Teller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7266347 | Gross | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267531 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271728 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272537 | Mogadam | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286057 | Bolling | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292914 | Jungmann et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7293645 | Harper et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315245 | Lynn et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330108 | Thomas | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7372367 | Lane et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7375640 | Plost | May 2008 | B1 |
7400264 | Boaz | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408470 | Wildman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411511 | Kennish et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423533 | LeBlond et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7425900 | Lynn et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440620 | Aartsen | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7443302 | Reeder et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443305 | Verdiramo | Oct 2008 | B2 |
RE40588 | Ostendorf et al. | Nov 2008 | E |
7450472 | Guyvarch | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457869 | Kernan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7474215 | Scott et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477148 | Lynn et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482936 | Bolling | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486193 | Elwell | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7487538 | Mok | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490045 | Flores et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496479 | Garcia et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7538680 | Scott et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7551092 | Henry | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7597122 | Smith | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7600137 | Trappeniers et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605704 | Munro et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611030 | Reynolds et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616122 | Bolling | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7718395 | Carling | May 2010 | B2 |
7780453 | Carling | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785109 | Carling | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812730 | Wildman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7978564 | De La Huerga | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982619 | Bolling | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8020733 | Snodgrass | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8026821 | Reeder et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056768 | Snodgrass | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8085155 | Prodanovich et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D654743 | Rospierski | Feb 2012 | S |
8212653 | Goldstein et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8237558 | Seyed Momen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8240517 | Stob et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8258965 | Reeder et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264343 | Snodgrass | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8342365 | Snodgrass | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8344893 | Drammeh | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8350706 | Wegelin et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8368544 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395515 | Tokhtuev | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8400309 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8482406 | Snodgrass | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8502680 | Tokhtuev et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8502681 | Bolling et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525666 | Melker et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8558701 | Wegelin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564431 | Snodgrass | Oct 2013 | B2 |
D693140 | Rospierski | Nov 2013 | S |
8587437 | Kyle et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8598996 | Wildman et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8633806 | Amir | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8633816 | Snodgrass et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8646656 | Johnson | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674840 | Snodgrass | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8783511 | Snodgrass | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8823525 | Cartner et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8847752 | Wegelin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8872665 | Snodgrass | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8963721 | Harris et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8963723 | Snodgrass | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9000930 | Pelland et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9047755 | Bonner | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9117361 | Hennigan et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9159216 | Limbert et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9239361 | Long | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9311809 | Diaz | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9349274 | Wegelin et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9524632 | Moore | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9633543 | Wegelin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633544 | Wegelin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633545 | Wegelin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20010039501 | Crevel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047214 | Cocking et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053939 | Crevel et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054038 | Crevel et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000449 | Armstrong | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019709 | Segal | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020050006 | Saraya | May 2002 | A1 |
20020103671 | Pederson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107744 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132343 | Lum | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135486 | Brohagen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145523 | Robaey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175182 | Matthews | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183979 | Wildman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030030562 | Lane et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065536 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074222 | Rosow et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030182180 | Zarrow | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040001009 | Winings et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015269 | Jungmann et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028608 | Saul et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049369 | Konicek et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075347 | Biskup, Sr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088076 | Gardner, Jr. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040090333 | Wildman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148196 | Kalies | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150527 | Harper et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162850 | Sanville et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050086341 | Enga et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102167 | Kapoor | May 2005 | A1 |
20050134466 | Tirkel | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149341 | Eguchi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171634 | York et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222889 | Lai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060067545 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067546 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071799 | Verdiramo | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104245 | Narayanaswami et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132316 | Wildman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139449 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140703 | Sacks | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154642 | Scannell, Jr. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156415 | Rubinstein et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060223731 | Carling | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229821 | Brossette et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060272361 | Snodgrass | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060273915 | Snodgrass | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008146 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008147 | Bolling | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008149 | Bolling | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016466 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020212 | Bernal et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029962 | Saeki | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044819 | Chan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055483 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070056091 | Bolton et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069884 | Waxman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070096930 | Cardoso | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135866 | Baker et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070182581 | Elwell | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198067 | Van den Heuvel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205861 | Nair et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213877 | Hart et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222599 | Coveley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229288 | Ogrin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247316 | Wildman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257803 | Munro et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285277 | Scott et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290865 | Lynn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001763 | Raja et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019489 | Lynn | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019490 | Lynn | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046278 | Sanville et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080084315 | Pittz | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080087719 | Sahud | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100441 | Prodanovich et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103636 | Glenn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131332 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177155 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185540 | Turner et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080189142 | Brown et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193631 | Kanamori et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080246599 | Hufton et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266113 | Kennish et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267408 | Hsieh | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280380 | Dietz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290112 | Lynn | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303658 | Melker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002644 | Christensen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019552 | McLaughlin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030721 | Garcia et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049610 | Heimbrock et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051545 | Koblasz | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090068116 | Arndt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084407 | Glenn et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090091458 | Deutsch | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102681 | Brennan, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112360 | Berg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119142 | Yenni et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127282 | Reynolds et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138303 | Seshadri | May 2009 | A1 |
20090195385 | Huang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204256 | Wegelin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090219131 | Barnett et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090219172 | Wilbrod | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224907 | Sinha et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224924 | Thorp | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266842 | Snodgrass | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267776 | Glenn et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272405 | Barnhill et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090273477 | Barnhill | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276239 | Swart et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299787 | Barnhill | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090301523 | Barnhill et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050314 | Oleyar et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094581 | Cagle | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097224 | Prodanovich et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117836 | Momen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125362 | Canora et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153374 | LeBlond et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164728 | Plost | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188228 | Hyland | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207767 | Verdiramo | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231385 | Melker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233020 | Klaassen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274640 | Morey et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100315243 | Tokhtuev et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315244 | Tokhtuev | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321180 | Dempsey et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326472 | Glenn et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328076 | Kyle et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332022 | Wegelin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110030730 | Lynn | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046921 | Sahud | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057799 | Taneff et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063106 | Snodgrass | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088809 | Lin | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093313 | LeBlond et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110121974 | Tenarvitz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110169645 | Cartner et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169646 | Raichman | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193703 | Payton et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197921 | Rubin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110207402 | Perkins et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234598 | Scarola et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110273298 | Snodgrass et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291840 | Pelland et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316701 | Alper et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316703 | Butler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320134 | Butler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120055986 | Sahud | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062382 | Taneff | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120073604 | Barnhill et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120112906 | Borke et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120112914 | Wegelin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140054 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158419 | Nuthi | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120187146 | Chopra | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120214879 | Arndt | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245729 | Wegelin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245951 | Gips et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256742 | Snodgrass et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120310664 | Long et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329438 | Snodgrass | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130045685 | Kiani | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130048718 | Tessier | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130075346 | Rumberger et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076514 | Wegelin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091631 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113931 | Alper | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120120 | Long et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130229276 | Hunter | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130234855 | Knighton | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130257615 | Iseri et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261795 | Long et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130264355 | Jodoin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290016 | Alper et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130306105 | Battah | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130333184 | Couture et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342349 | Cruz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140009292 | Long et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015670 | Wegelin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140070950 | Snodgrass | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140081653 | Davis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140214449 | Long et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140253334 | Hanlin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279603 | Ortiz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140361898 | Wegelin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022361 | Gaisser et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035678 | Long | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150048940 | Keown et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150127365 | Rizvi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134354 | Alper et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150179047 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150194043 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150199883 | Hartley et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150313422 | Ophardt et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160093195 | Ophardt | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2015258158 | Dec 2015 | AU |
2592814 | Dec 2007 | CA |
2780411 | Dec 2013 | CA |
101592510 | Dec 2009 | CN |
201974318 | Sep 2011 | CN |
202677403 | Jan 2013 | CN |
69708606 | Aug 2002 | DE |
69917795 | Jul 2005 | DE |
19882120 | Oct 2010 | DE |
102012105365 | Dec 2013 | DE |
2015665 | Nov 2009 | DK |
0921506 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1121500 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1245016 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1099400 | May 2001 | EP |
1201172 | May 2002 | EP |
1791077 | May 2004 | EP |
1390204 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1034132 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1794727 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1483728 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1872802 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1872892 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1913892 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2223642 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2511889 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2509017 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2637540 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2872315 | Dec 2005 | FR |
2997779 | May 2014 | FR |
2137749 | Oct 1984 | GB |
2217013 | Oct 1989 | GB |
2299405 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2324397 | Oct 1998 | GB |
2337327 | Nov 1999 | GB |
2340647 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2394654 | May 2004 | GB |
2417810 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2417811 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2425388 | Oct 2006 | GB |
2446871 | Aug 2007 | GB |
2437555 | Oct 2007 | GB |
2439306 | Dec 2007 | GB |
2439457 | Dec 2007 | GB |
2452189 | Feb 2009 | GB |
2474317 | Apr 2011 | GB |
2486767 | Jun 2012 | GB |
H01219439 | Sep 1989 | JP |
10309540 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2002197559 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003105819 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003122823 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2006132277 | May 2005 | JP |
2005218999 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006198318 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2009282442 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2013017631 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013180046 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2013187557 | Sep 2013 | JP |
882280 | May 2002 | PT |
WO9213327 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO9731350 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9809261 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9836258 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9930299 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO0022260 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0133529 | May 2001 | WO |
WO0221475 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO0294073 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03079278 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03082351 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2005055793 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005055793 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005094711 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2006036687 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006135922 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO2007001866 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007090470 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007127495 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007129289 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007133960 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008088424 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008118143 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008119158 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008133495 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009087046 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009097096 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2009134242 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2010026581 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010028320 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010034125 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010070072 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010093349 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010099488 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010101929 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010104564 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010118242 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2012148771 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2010143091 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010143092 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011031774 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011038173 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011058293 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011062658 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011072837 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011085292 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011119695 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO2012064515 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012178045 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO2013025889 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO2013025956 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013033243 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO2013049357 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013049462 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013055616 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013058821 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013063690 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013070888 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013074660 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013140253 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013165585 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014027030 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014037938 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO2014046645 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014060726 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2014205283 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO2015061718 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Al-Hamad et al., “How Clean is Clean? Proposed Methods for Hospital Cleaning Assessment,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 70, Oct. 9, 2008, pp. 328-334. |
Anonymous et al., “Hand Hygiene,” Progressive Grocer, vol. 76, No. 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 111-112. |
Bourn, Auditor General for Wales, “The Management and Delivery of Hospital Cleaning Services in Wales,” National Audit Office Wales, 39 pp., May 23, 2003. |
Dancer, “How do we Assess Hospital Cleaning? A Proposal for Microbiological Standards for Surface Hygiene in Hospitals” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 56, Sep. 2003, pp. 10-15. |
Diller et al., “Estimation of hand hygiene opportunities on an adult medical ward using 24-hour camera surveillance: Validation of the HOW2 Benchmark Study,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 42, 2014 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2014, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) pp. 602-607. |
Dix et al., “Environmental Surface Cleaning: First Defense Against Infectious Agents,” Infection Control Today Magazine, 6 pp., Dec. 1, 2005. |
Elliott, “Determining Three Metrics for Cleaning Satisfaction,” found at http://www.facilitiesnet.com/fn/article.asp?id-7698, equipmentrentaltools/article/Determining-Three-Metrics-for -Cleaning-Satisfaction—7698#, Nov. 2007, 2 pp. |
Evaluating Municipal Services: Scorecard Cleanliness Program Prospectus, New York, found at http://www.worldsweeper.com/Street/Profiles/NYCScorecard.pdf, archived Jan. 5, 2009, 16 pp. |
Exner et al., “Household Cleaning and Surface Disinfection: New Insights and Strategies,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 56, 2008, pp. s70-s75. |
Florida Department of Health, “Guidelines for Control of Antibiotic Resistant Organisms,” Dec. 20, 1999, 34 pp. |
Griffith et al., “An Evaluation of Hospital Cleaning Regimes and Standards,” J. Hosp. Infect., vol. 45, pp. 19-28, 2000, accepted Dec. 23, 1999. |
Griffith et al., “The Effectiveness of Existing and Modified Cleaning Regimens in a Welsh Hospital,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 66, Jul. 26, 2007, pp. 352-359. |
Griffith, “Nosocomial infection: Are there lessons from the food industry?” The Biomedical Scientist, pp. 697-699, Aug. 2006. |
Hamilton et al., “Hand Hygiene,” Wild Iris Medical Education, Inc., 2014, (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2014, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 24 pp. |
“Hand Washing, Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care,” Infection Control Guidelines, Canada Communicable Disease Report, vol. 24S8, Dec. 1998, 66 pp. |
“Measuring Hand Hygiene Adherence: Overcoming the Challenges,” The Joint Commission et al., 2009 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2009, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 234 pp. |
Larson, “APIC Guideline for Hand Washing and Hand Antisepsis in Health-Care Settings*,” APIC Guidelines Committee, 1995, (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 1995, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.), Am J Infect Control, 23:251, 18 pp. |
Larson et al., “A Multifaceted Approach to Changing Handwashing Behavior,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 25, Feb. 1997, pp. 3-10. |
Lewis et al., “A Modified ATP Benchmark for Evaluating the Cleaning of Some Hospital Environmental Surfaces,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 69, May 12, 2008, pp. 156-163. |
Malik et al., “Use of Audit Tools to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cleaning Systems in Hospitals,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 31, No. 3, p. 181-187, May 2003. |
Mallow General Hospital, “Hygiene Services Assessment Scheme, Assessment Report,” 38 pp., Oct. 2007. |
Mangram et al., “Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 20, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 247-278. |
Meengs et al., “Hand Washing Frequency in an Emergency Department,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 23, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 1307-1312. |
Mills et al., “Guidelines for Working with Rodents Potentially Infected with Hantavirus,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 76, No. 3, Aug. 1995, pp. 716-722. |
CDC, HICPAC, “Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Recommendations and Reports, (MMWR)vol. 51, No. RR-16, Oct. 25, 2002, 56 pp. |
Munro et al., “Treating Exposure to Chemical Warfare Agents: Implications for Health Care Providers and Community Emergency Planning,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 89, 1990 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 1990, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) pp. 205-2015. |
“Net/Tech to Unveil Patented Hygiene Guard Hand-Washing Monitoring System at the National Restaurant Show,” BusinessWire, Apr. 3, 1997, 3 pp. |
Ophardt, Hygiene-Technik GmbH+ Co. KG, “Making the World a More Hygienic Place”, Hygiene Compliance Solutions, 2009, 1 page. |
Pittet et al., “Compliance with Handwashing in a Teaching Hospital,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 130, No. 2, Jan. 19, 1999, pp. 126-130. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl No. 12/787,064, dated Dec. 6, 2012 through Apr. 8, 2013, 20 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,097, dated Jun. 4, 2012 through Nov. 7, 2012, 21 pp. |
Quattrin, Md. et al., “Application of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points to Control Surgical Site Infections in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty,” Orthopedics 31:132, 6 pp., 2008, SLACK Incorporated. |
SaferCorp, LLC, “SaferCorp Life Advantage Solutions presents SaferHands™ Hospital Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring System”, retrieved electronically from http://www.guardianics.com/ on Dec. 15, 2010, 14 pp. |
SaferCorp, LLC, Guardian™ Automated Infection Control Systems (GAICS), Feb. 6, 2010, 4 pp. |
Sax et al., “My five moments for hand hygiene: a user-centered design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 67, Aug. 27, 2007, pp. 9-21. |
Semmelweis, “The Etiology, Concept, and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever,” The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 1983, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 14 pp. |
Steed et al., “Hospital Hand Hygiene Opportunities: Where and When (HOW2)? The HOW2 Benchmark Study,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 39, Feb. 2011, 8 pp. |
Sturman et al., “Cornell University Hospitality Report: A New Method for Measuring Housekeeping Performance Consistency,” CHR Reports, vol. 6, No. 11, Sep. 2006, 15 pp. |
Swoboda et al., “Electronic Monitoring and Voice Prompts Improve Hand Hygiene and Decrease Nosocomial Infections in an Intermediate Care Unit,” Crit Care Med, vol. 32, No. 2, 2004 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2004, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, Jan. 13, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) pp. 358-363. |
Taylor, An Evaluation of Handwashing Techniques-1, Nursing Times, vol. 74, Jan. 12, 1978, pp. 54-55. |
Thompson et al., “Handwashing and Glove Use in a Long-Term-Care Facility,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 18, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 97-103. |
Tibballs et al., “Teaching Hospital Medical Staff to Handwash,” The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 164, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1996, pp. 395-398. |
Van Ryzin et al., “Measuring Street Cleanliness: A Comparison of New York City's Scorecard and Results from a Citizen Survey,” Public Administration Review 68(2), Mar./Apr. 2008, pp. 295-303. |
Yoshikura, “Workflow from Clean to Dirty, HACCP and Inclusiveness Principles in Effective Implementation of Hospital Infection Control,” Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 53, Jun. 6, 2000, 2 pp. |
Watanakunakorn et al., “An Observational Study of Hand Washing and Infection Control Practices by Healhcare Workers,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiolgy, vol. 19, No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 858-860. |
“WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (Advanced Draft),” World Health Organization, Apr. 2006, 216 pp. |
“WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care,” World Health Organization, 2009 (Applicant points out, in accorace with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2009, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 270 pp. |
“Evidence of hand hygiene to reduce transmission and infections by multi-drug resistant organisms in health-care settings,” World Health Organization, Jan. 5, 2014, 7 pp. |
Zuhlsdorf et al., “Cleaning Efficacy of Nine Different Cleaners in a Washer-Disinfector Designed for Flexible Endoscopes,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 52, Oct. 9, 2002, pp. 206-211. |
“Don't Get Caught Dirty Handed,” ASM's Microbes Afterhours, Sep. 6, 2009, 11 pp. |
“America's Dirty Little Secret: Second Handwashing Survey Reveals Americans Still Don't Get It,” American Society for Microbiology, Sep. 19, 2000, 3 pp. |
Garner et al., “Guideline for Handwashing and Hospital Environmental Control,” CDC Prevention Guidelines, Jan. 1, 1985, 10 pp. |
Garner, “Guidelines for Isolation Precautions in Hospitals,” Hospital Infection Control Advisory Committee, Jan. 1, 1996, 39 pp. |
Hicpac, “Recommendations for Preventing the Spread of Vancomycin Resistance,” Morbidity and CDC Mortality Weekly Report, Recommendations and Reports, vol. 44, No. RR-12, 1-13, Sep. 22, 1995, 16 pp. |
“Dr. Semmelweiss Was Right: Washing Hands Prevents Infection,” Water Quality and Health Council, retrieved from www.waterandhealth.org/newsletter/new/4/12/2017/right.htm, Feb. 2017, 2 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/437,466 by David L. Snodgrass, filed Jan. 28, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/486,491 by David L. Snodgrass, filed May 16, 2011. |
“Bentley WiNET Tag User Guide—FAS1503, DOC1036,” UltraClenz, Jan. 25, 2011, 12 pp. |
“ProGiene System Description for UL and CE Mark Approval,” UltraClenz, Feb. 8, 2002, 5 pp. |
Green, “Hand hygiene in 2015: 7 Findings,” retrieved from http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality!hand-hygiene-i n-2015-7-findings.htm l?tm pl=component&print= 1 &layout=default&page=, Nov. 12, 2015, 1 pp. |
“3M and Patient Care Technology Systems Collaborate on State of-the-Art Automated Hand Hygiene Solution to Improve Compliance,” retrieved from http://news.3m.com/pt/press-release/company/3m-and-patient-care-technology, on Apr. 13, 2017, 2 pp. |
Sahud et al., “An Electronic Hand Hygiene Surveillance Device: A Pilot Study Exploring Surrogate Makers for Hand Hygiene Compliance,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 31, No. 6, Jun. 2010, 6 pp. |
Swedberg, “RFID-based Hand-Hygiene System Prevents Health-Care Acquired Infections,” RFID Journal, Jun. 10, 2010, 2 pp. |
“Patient Safeguard System Healthcare Worker Badge User's Guide,” DOC1046 Revision 8, UltraClenz, Mar. 14, 2012, 21 pp. |
Levchenko et al., “Embedded System for Hygiene Compliance Monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 7, No. 3, Jul. 2010, 4 pp. |
Tsai et al., “iMAT: Intelligent Medication Administration Tools,” Aug. 2010, 8 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170200360 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61756791 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14164930 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 15406129 | US |