Wireless communication for dispenser beacons

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9824569
  • Patent Number
    9,824,569
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 13, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 21, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A communication system for hygiene compliance monitoring comprising a plurality of hygiene dispensers for dispensing hygiene product, each dispenser having a transmitter for transmitting data indicating the status of dispenser, such as product remaining in the dispenser to a central monitoring station.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to hygiene dispenser systems and for monitoring hygiene compliance data by users of such systems, and more particularly to a communication system for wirelessly transmitting dispenser status data from the dispensers to a central station, including a cellular telephone network.


Hygiene compliance systems collect hygiene compliance data collected by sensors at a hygiene dispenser system. The data is typically stored locally at the hygiene dispenser. The data may be transmitted over a communications line which may be a hard-wire, such as a half-duplex RS-485 network to a central location, which may receive data from a plurality of hygiene dispensers. The data may be analyzed at the central location, and hygiene compliance reports may be generated with a view towards insuring compliance with hygiene protocols and regulations, and to improve compliance when compliance has been found to be lacking, not optimal, or in need of improvement in some way.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In some hygiene compliance systems, the hygiene data is transferred over a local network at a customer site to a monitoring station which collects and analyses the information.


Sometimes a different entity, other than the customer, collects and analyzes the data, but the data is still transferred over the customer-owned or -operated network. This may result in security issues, as the different entity doing the monitoring, should not, from the customer's perspective, have access to the entire network which includes data other than hygiene monitoring data. Also, the different entity doing the monitoring may be monitoring with a proprietary data protocol or other proprietary software application, which the different entity wishes to keep confidential from the customer.


If data is communicated over a data cable between the dispensers and a data collection device, the data cable may be expensive to install, especially for retro-fit applications. If the data collection device is a personal computer (“PC”) which runs a proprietary application program at a different entity, both the customer and different entity can develop a strained relationship. If the customer opens a port in the customer's network firewall, security concerns are raised, subjecting the customer to possible security breaches by not only the different entity, but from other entities as well, seeking to hack into the customer's system through the firewall.


The present invention provides a communication arrangement which addresses some, or all, of the above concerns about cost, retro-fitting, security, and maintaining good relationships between the customer and different entity performing the data collection and compliance monitoring.


The present invention provides a reliable and cost-effective, low band-width wireless network that can be easily installed either initially, or retro-fitted in an indoor environment, and that is capable of communicating hygiene dispenser status data to an off-site location, while also minimizing the burden on the customer and the customer's personnel, and existing on-site customer's network infrastructure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an overall configuration of sensors, hubs, a gateway, and a cellular network.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A preferred embodiment according to the invention will be described, but the invention is not limited to this embodiment.



FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an overall configuration of a communication system for hygiene compliance monitoring according to the invention. The system 10 comprises a plurality of sensors S. Each sensor S collects hygiene compliance data of a hygiene fixture, such as a sink with a dispenser which dispenses hygiene product either manually or automatically (or both) as requested, or in response to, a user's presence. Examples of sensors are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2006/0273361 and 2006/0273915, which are incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, a sensor will collect and store hygiene compliance data, such as the identity of persons, at what times in the day such persons have performed a hygiene procedure, and whether such hygiene procedure has been correctly performed correctly according to a hygiene protocol. Variations of such compliance data may occur as understood by those skilled in the art.


The sensors may be embedded in the dispensers and may detect, and then transmit, or broadcast, data representing each dispenser activation and hygiene compliance event. Hubs H, located within reception range of a plurality of sensors, will receive the transmitted data and re-transmit the data to a gateway G, servicing a plurality of hubs H. The gateway G will then transmit the data over a cellular network CN to a remote server RS with database store. The remote server RS can be connected to the internet, and remote users RU can log onto the remote server RS with appropriate password over the internet, and retrieve the remote dispenser activation event data for processing and analysis, such as generating hygiene compliance reports.


The transmission range of the sensors S may be on the order of 50 feet, or more, to ensure that respective hub H can receive the transmitted data. The transmission of the hub H will preferably have a longer range of 100 feet or more to ensure that the gateway G will receive the transmitted data from the hubs H.


The above-described topology will provide a network at good-performance and low-cost, avoiding hand-wiring of both original and retro-fit installations.


Hubs H can be located throughout a customer facility. In addition to receiving data from sensors S, and transmitting to a gateway G, the hubs H can also, or alternatively, function as repeaters, relaying data from one hub to another to the gateway G. Good radio frequency (RF) coverage will thus be obtained, while allowing the sensors to operate at low-power levels, thereby extending battery life. By having the hubs H, which are less costly than a gateway G, serve as repeaters, savings can result by having only one gateway G at a facility, although it may be useful to have a plurality of gateways G for redundancy in case of a failure of a gateway G. Hubs H can also be provided with ranges in an over-lapping manner, so that even if a hub H becomes inoperative or loses power, the remaining hubs H can provide the transmission and repeating operations.


The gateway G uses a cellular modem to transmit the data over a cellular network. As cellular modems are relatively costly to acquire and operate, minimizing the cellular modem count to a low number, even one, will minimize installation and operating costs.


The sensor S and hubs H may operate on 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz bands, but preferably will operate at 433 MHz to avoid interference with the former two bands which are popular and crowded. Also, the 433 MHz band is better able to penetrate obstacles, like walls. As other less crowded frequency bands become available, they may be used as well. Spread spectrum transmission may be used to reduce noise and/or interference.


Each sensor S is preferably self-powered with a battery so that it can be used with existing manual and touch-free dispensers, which do not presently have power available to power the sensor. The sensor S, especially for a manual dispenser, may have a mechanical interface such as a contact closure, magnetic reed switch, or Hall-effect sensor. The preferred interface is the contact closure as this is the most reliable.


The dispensers preferably have an “expansion port”. The expansion port may have an active low 3.3V logic level pin available with a 100 KΩ pull-up resistor. This pin goes active during the dispenser pump cycle which is about one second in duration. However, the manual dispenser's activation could be much shorter. To make the sensor compatible with both the manual and touch-free dispensers, the 100 KΩ pull-up resistor may be removed from the touch-free dispenser. The sensor will have a 100 KΩ pull-up resistor which makes the contact closure interface self-contained and eliminates the need to add a pull-up resistor and Vcc source to the manual dispenser.


The manual dispenser is different from the touch-free because it is completely under user control. The sensor should be able to detect an activation event with a minimum duration of 100 ms. A user may not fully depress the push bar or push it very quickly causing the limit switch (contact closure) to only be closed for a short period of time. The sensor may be designed to detect up to 100 consecutive activation events in rapid succession. It is not uncommon for users to take multiple doses very rapidly. The sensor should be able to buffer up to 100 consecutive activation events in rapid succession also buffering a time offset, for each activation, based on the first activation in a rapid succession series (see Table 1). Buffering will also be preferred if one or more activations occur while the sensor is transmitting. The time offset will allow the hub to recognize the buffered activations as valid. The time offset can be added, by the hub, to the time stamp of the first activation thus resolving the time of activation for the buffered event. The time stamp will have a resolution of 1 second so it is possible that more than one valid activation will have the same time stamp. When the buffer is empty, the time offset will be cleared to 0.


Some sensors may be within range of more than one hub. This will result in multiple hubs collecting activation event data from one sensor. The remote server can detect and discard duplicate activation events before storing them in a database. More than one activation can have the same time stamp from the same sensor. To allow the server to distinguish between valid activations with the same time stamp and duplicate activations with the same time stamp, an 8-bit counter (see table 1) can be incremented with each activation. If the server sees two activations with the same time stamp from the same sensor but different counts, both activations are valid, otherwise one is a duplicate and can be discarded.


Multiple hubs may not have perfectly synchronized real-time clocks (RTC). In the case where two or more of these out of sync hubs are within range of a single sensor, each may record and time stamp the same activation event but the time stamps will not match. This creates a situation that makes it difficult for the remote server to detect duplicate activations unless an 8-bit activation count is implemented by the sensor.









TABLE 1







Possible Rapid Successive Activation Scenario











Activation

Time
8-Bit
Time


Event
Time
Offset
Counter
Stamp
















02:42:15.0
0
ms
253
02:42:15



02:42:15.1
100
ms
254
02:42:15


1
02:42:15.6
600
ms
255
02:42:15


2
02:42:16.1
1,100
ms
0
02:42:16







No Activity












1
02:55:38.5
0
ms
1
02:55:38







No Activity












1
02:56:03.7
0
ms
2
02:56:03







No Activity












1
03:11:26.4
0
ms
3
03:11:26


2
03:11:26.8
400
ms
4
03:11:26









The sensor will create an 8-byte event record for each activation that occurs (see Table 2). This record will be transmitted to the nearest hub. The event record will contain a factory programmed 32-bit device address that is unique to the sensor, an 8-bit device ID that will distinguish the current sensor from other sensors designed in the future, an 8-bit event ID to identify what kind of event occurred, an 8-bit activation count to identify duplicate event records and an 8-bit time offset to resolve activation time for multiple events occurring before they can be transmitted.









TABLE 2





8-Byte Sensor Event Record






















Device
Address
Address
Address
Address
Event
8-Bit
Time


ID
Byte 0
Byte 1
Byte 2
Byte 3
ID
Activation
Offset








Count









The Address Bytes 0-3 may have a factory-programmed value between 0 and 4,294,967,296 that is unique for each sensor


The Device ID may have a value from 0 to 255 that identifies the type of sensor from which the event record originated. The value for the current sensor (type 1) will be 0.


The Event ID may have a value from 0 to 255 that identifies the type of event that occurred. The current sensor (type 1) only has one event, a contact closure (dispenser activation). Sensors may have more event options such as cover open, cover closed, low battery, object blocking dispenser's IR etc. The value for a dispenser activation event will be 0.


The 8-Bit Activation Count may have a value between 0 and 255 that is incremented with each activation event. Consecutive activation events should not have the same number. When the count reaches 255, it will circle back to 0 on the following activation.


The Time Offset may have a value from 0 to 255 that, for the current activation, represents the amount of time that has passed since the first previous activation that has not yet been transmitted. The time offset value may be in 100 ms intervals i.e. 0=0 ms, 1=100 ms, 2=200 ms etc. It is possible to compress several of the above bytes into 4-bit upper and lower nibbles if the power budget requires it.


An alternative to the above-described sensors S will now be described.


A header on the dispenser's PCB may be available with power and an I2C or similar interface for an embedded sensor which would be mounted directly to the dispenser's PCB. By having a communication interface directly to the dispenser's μC, the sensor may be able to transmit not only an activation event but also low battery level, cover opened, cover closed and IR obstruction events. Dispenser configuration information such as dose setting (1, 2, 3), IR range (long, short), battery level, etc. could also be transmitted at the request of a remote user. This information could be used to remotely monitor the health and configuration of a customer's dispenser. For example, the remote server could be configured, by a remote user, to generate a warning email that would automatically be sent to a customer with a list of individual dispensers that have low batteries allowing the customer to preempt dispenser failure.


The sensor may have more communication demands made of it than the first-described sensor, and therefore, will likely consume more power. An external power source may be necessary. This means that the sensor will only be used with the touch-free dispenser and use the dispenser's D-cell batteries as its power source.


The function of the hub H is to receive, time-date stamp and buffer activation data (event records) transmitted from the surrounding sensors within its range. It then passes this data along to the nearest hub or gateway when it is requested.


The hub H should preferably be able to receive transmitted data from sensors a minimum of 50 feet away in an indoor environment. Indoor range is a subjective term so it will be assumed that the signal will only pass through a maximum of two interior walls composed of drywall and metal studs or that the signal will only pass through one exterior wall, firewall, or floor, composed of formed concrete with embedded rebar.


The hub H should preferably be able to process up to 100 sensors and up to 20 sensors transmitting activation events at the same time. A hub typically processes one event at a time so a maximum time-date stamp latency of 10 seconds may be used. This should allow enough time for each individual sensor event to be processed by the hub


Each hub may be equipped with a battery backed real-time clock (RTC) with a minimum accuracy of +/−5 ppm. The gateway should attempt to update each hub's RTC at least once every 24 hours to keep all hubs synchronized. When a sensor's activation event is received, the hub will do the following: (1) log the event record; (2) log the current time of the RTC to create a time-date stamp for the event; (3) check the event record's time offset byte; (4) if time offset byte is not equal to 0, adjust time-date stamp accordingly; and (5) buffer event record with time-date stamp in circular queue. Some MSP430 μCs have a built-in RTC. This would eliminate the need for the hub to deal with time offset and keep things simple.


A circular queue may be used to buffer the last 10,000 activation events for all sensors within the hub's range. The queue will also serve as a local archive so that the remote server can request past events that may have been lost or corrupted. When the queue is full, new events will overwrite the oldest buffered events.


The hub may also function as a repeater. This wireless topology attempts to minimize the number of gateways required to send data to a remote server. To do so, hubs that are out of the gateway's range will transmit and receive data from hubs that are within their range. In turn, these hubs will transmit and receive data from hubs within their range until the data finally reaches a gateway. This forwarding of data from one hub to another will form a simple ad hoc or mesh type of network. Each hub may be able to transmit to and receive data from other hubs or a gateway a minimum of 100 feet away in an indoor environment. The signal may pass through a maximum of two interior walls composed of drywall and metal studs. It will also be assumed that the signal may only pass through one exterior wall, firewall, or floor composed of formed concrete with embedded rebar. External power may be required due to the large distance and communication demands placed on the hub. The hub may be powered from an external 6 VDC to 12 VDC source such as a class 2 transformer.


When activation event data is requested by the gateway, the hub will send the event record as in Table 3:











TABLE 3







Hub Device ID
= 0-255
8-bit device ID to identify type of




device (100 for the hub)


Hub Address Byte 0
= 0-255
32-bit (bytes 0 thru 3) hub address


Hub Address Byte 1
= 0-255



Hub Address Byte 2
= 0-255



Hub Address Byte 3
= 0-255



Event Time Stamp
= 0-23
Hours time stamp applied when


Hours

event record is received from sensor


Event Time Stamp
= 0-59
Minutes time stamp applied when


Minutes

event record is received from sensor


Event Time Stamp
= 0-59
Seconds time stamp applied when


Seconds

event record is received from sensor


Event Time Stamp
= 0-23
Month time stamp applied when


Month

event record is received from sensor


Event Time Stamp
= 1-31
Day time stamp applied when event


Day

record is received from sensor


Event Time Stamp
= 0-99
Year time stamp applied when event


Year

record is received from sensor


Sensor Device ID
= 0-255
8-Bit Device ID to identify type of




device


Sensor Address
= 0-255
32-Bit (bytes 0 thru 3) sensor


Byte 0

address


Sensor Address
= 0-255



Byte 1




Sensor Address
= 0-255



Byte 2




Sensor Address
= 0-255



Byte 3




Sensor Event ID
= 0-255
8-bit event ID to identify type of




event that occurred


Sensor Activation
= 0-255
8-bit count sensor activation count


Count









The data in Table 3 may be in binary form using a proprietary protocol. This would make the data sufficiently difficult to decipher and eliminate the need for encryption. It is possible to compress the time-date stamp data but it is being presented in its current form to make parsing easier. Hub device ID, sensor event ID and sensor device ID may be included.


Hub installation is preferably as simple as possible. One should determine what sensors, hubs, or gateways are within range. An installer should preferably have a laptop PC available during installation. This will allow the use of a software tool that can be used to configure the hub (if necessary) and determine what devices are within range. The hub will have a half-duplex RS-485 serial port that will allow connection to the installer's PC.


The hub may be able to “discover” what other devices are within range without the need for the installer to intervene. This would be possible because each device will have a unique device ID and address combination. Discovery needs to occur within a reasonable amount of time because installers will charge by the hour.


The device may use a custom sheet metal enclosure or an ABS enclosure. Depending on size, mounting holes will be available in the PCB for fasteners. All connectors are preferably mounted at the PCB's edge for access through enclosure. Enclosure may be made of 1.5 mm steel or aluminum, with 2.50 mm from edge of PCB to outside surface of enclosure for connector placement. A right angle PCB mount SMA connector could be used so the antenna can be attached to the hub by the installer.


If the dispenser is empty, a user may try to simulate a dispensing of hygiene product by standing in front of the dispenser so that his presence and identity is sensed, even though the user will not cleanse his hands. To address this potential problem, the dispenser has a button which can be pressed by a user to signal that the dispenser is empty of hygiene product, or in need of other service such as maintenance (e.g., cleaning) or repair. In addition, or in the alternative, the dispenser can have a sensor which can detect when the dispenser is empty of hygiene product, the amount of hygiene product remaining, or maintenance or repair service.


The reading of the button and/or sensors can be transmitted to a local server, remote server, offsite server or the like. The information can be transmitted, if necessary, through one or more hubs, through the gateway and then over the cellular network. The system can thus monitor the amount of hygiene product remaining, and when a dispenser needs to be filled, as well as any needed maintenance or repair. By tracking consumption, the system can provide predicted “run-out” times, and generate messages for dispensers to be refilled, the dispenser can be reset, or the capacity sensor will sense that the dispenser is filled.


The information sent would include the dispenser's address (location), time, date and a flag indicating that the dispenser is empty, the amount of hygiene product remaining, and the current operative “status” including operation OK, or need for maintenance or repair. The system can periodically “poll” the dispensers to request the status of each dispenser and how much hygiene product is remaining.


When a user presses a button, the dispenser will send a message, which could be over a 433 MHz wireless network, with the dispenser's address, time, date and flag indicating “dispenser empty” or other operative status. When the message reaches the offsite server, after being transmitted through the hub and gateway, the server will process the message and send an alert to appropriate personnel by email, SMS text message, phone message and/or other method of communication. The alert can be configured to display on a web-based software graphic user interface.


The offsite server is configured at setup/installation with the various locations of each of the dispenser addresses. This will allow the appropriate personnel receiving the alert to know the physical location of the dispenser that needs a refill or other service, as well as the time and date that it was reported to need refilling or service.


As mentioned previously, one or more sensors in the dispenser could be provided to detect the amount of hygiene product remaining in the dispenser, and the sensors could automatically transmit the information to the server. The transmission could be at a periodic time interval, or when the product reaches certain quantity amounts remaining, such as ½, ¼, etc., or 10 oz., 5 oz., etc. A program in the sensor could also track consumption rates of each dispenser, and be used to track the consumption rate at that dispenser and predict the time when the dispenser should be refilled before it gets completely empty, or other routine service such as cleaning, battery replacement, etc.


Although a preferred embodiment has been described, the invention is not limited to this embodiment and the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.









APPENDIX A







DEVICE ID ASSIGNMENT









Device
ID
Description












N/A
0
Broadcast to all device types


ProGiene G3
1
ProGiene G3 touch-five group hand hygiene




monitoring dispenser


ProSense
2
ProSense touch-five faucet controller


Controller




RESERVED
3
Reserved for future use


ProGiene Data
4
Hand held data logger for ProGiene G3


Logger

virtual network


Sensor T1
5
Wireless sensor type 1 - contact closure event


Sensor T2
6
Wireless sensors type 2 - multi-event with PC




interface


Hub
100
Wireless hub/repeater


Gateway
101
Wireless gateway with embedded GSM modem


RESERVED
250
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
251
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
252
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
253
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
254
Reserved for future use


Master
255
Master device for master/slave RS-485 protocol
















APPENDIX B







EVENT ID ASSIGNMENT









Event
ID
Description












RESERVED
0
Reserved for future use


Dispenser Activation
1
Contact closure - dispenser activation


Dispenser Cover Opened
2
Dispenser's cover was opened


Dispenser Cover Closed
3
Dispenser's cover was closed


Object Blocking IR
4
Object placed under dispenser within




IR range


Object Blocking IR
5
Object under dispenser within IR


Removed

range removed


RESERVED
250
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
251
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
252
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
253
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
254
Reserved for future use


RESERVED
255
Reserved for future use








Claims
  • 1. A communication system for hygiene compliance monitoring comprising: a central monitoring station; anda plurality of dispensers that dispense hygiene product, each dispenser including: a transmitter that transmits data indicating a status of the dispenser to the central monitoring station;a capacity sensor that senses whether the dispenser is filled to capacity with hygiene product;a sensor that detects the amount of hygiene product remaining in the dispenser; anda cover open/closed sensor that detects if a cover of the dispenser is open or closed;wherein the status of the dispenser indicates when the dispenser is in need of repair, when the dispenser is in need of cleaning, when the dispenser is empty of hygiene product, when the dispenser requires battery replacement, whether the cover is open, and the amount of hygiene product remaining in the dispenser.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein each dispenser has a switch for activation by a user to indicate that the dispenser needs refilling.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the transmitter transmits data indicating the status periodically.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the transmitter transmits data indicating the status when the product remaining in the dispenser needs refilling.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the data indicating the status includes the identity of the dispenser.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the data indicating the status includes a time stamp.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the central monitoring station stores the data received and calculates a projected time for refilling the dispenser before hygiene product is depleted.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the transmitter transmits the data wirelessly.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the central monitoring station transmits an alert signal after receiving data from the dispenser indicating that a dispenser is empty of hygiene product.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the alert signal is at least one of an email message, SMS text message or phone message.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the central monitoring station transmits a polling signal to each dispenser to poll the status of the dispenser, and wherein the dispenser transmits the data in response to receipt of the polling signal.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the central monitoring station transmits the polling signal periodically.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of dispensers are one of a manual or a touch-free dispenser.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/164,930, filed on Jan. 27, 2014, entitled, “WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FOR DISPENSER BEACONS” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/756,791 filed Jan. 25, 2013, which is incorporated by reference herein. This application also incorporates by reference U.S. Ser. No. 61/437,466 filed Jan. 28, 2011, U.S. Ser. No. 61/486,491 filed May 16, 2011, U.S. Ser. No. 13/215,823 filed Aug. 23, 2011 and U.S. Ser. No. 13/612,095 filed Sep. 12, 2012.

US Referenced Citations (435)
Number Name Date Kind
3736584 Hackett et al. May 1973 A
3761909 Schweitzer et al. Sep 1973 A
3786467 Cotter Jan 1974 A
3801977 Cotter Apr 1974 A
3866198 Cohen Feb 1975 A
3961321 Moss Jun 1976 A
3986182 Hackett Oct 1976 A
4076146 Lausberg et al. Feb 1978 A
4083298 Schotten Apr 1978 A
4117462 Miller Sep 1978 A
4198618 Kleinschmidt Apr 1980 A
4209776 Frederick Jun 1980 A
4275390 Heywang et al. Jun 1981 A
4319349 Hackett Mar 1982 A
4360905 Hackett Nov 1982 A
4380726 Sado et al. Apr 1983 A
4486910 Saalmann et al. Dec 1984 A
4539846 Grossman Sep 1985 A
4590460 Abbott et al. May 1986 A
4606085 Davies Aug 1986 A
4644509 Kiewit et al. Feb 1987 A
4688585 Vetter Aug 1987 A
4727522 Steiner et al. Feb 1988 A
4729120 Steiner et al. Mar 1988 A
4839597 Rowland Jun 1989 A
4896144 Bogstad Jan 1990 A
4987402 Nykerk Jan 1991 A
4991146 Ransdell et al. Feb 1991 A
5083298 Citterio et al. Jan 1992 A
5110364 Mazur et al. May 1992 A
5150099 Lienau Sep 1992 A
5153520 Dumbeck Oct 1992 A
5202666 Knippscheer Apr 1993 A
5245317 Chidley et al. Sep 1993 A
5263006 Hermesmeyer Nov 1993 A
5309409 Jones et al. May 1994 A
5370267 Schroeder Dec 1994 A
5390385 Beldham Feb 1995 A
5430293 Sato et al. Jul 1995 A
5463595 Rodhall et al. Oct 1995 A
5467481 Srivastava Nov 1995 A
5570079 Dockery Oct 1996 A
5610589 Evans et al. Mar 1997 A
5625659 Sears Apr 1997 A
5661471 Kotlicki Aug 1997 A
5684458 Calvarese Nov 1997 A
5687717 Halpern et al. Nov 1997 A
5695091 Winings et al. Dec 1997 A
5731526 Kindrick Mar 1998 A
5764136 Harron Jun 1998 A
5765605 Waymire et al. Jun 1998 A
5771925 Lewandowski Jun 1998 A
D396009 Reubens Jul 1998 S
H1743 Graves et al. Aug 1998 H
5793653 Segal Aug 1998 A
5812059 Shaw et al. Sep 1998 A
5887145 Harari et al. Mar 1999 A
5900067 Jones May 1999 A
5913915 McQuinn Jun 1999 A
5917425 Crimmins et al. Jun 1999 A
5939974 Heagle et al. Aug 1999 A
5945910 Gorra Aug 1999 A
5952924 Evans et al. Sep 1999 A
5954069 Foster Sep 1999 A
5966753 Gauthier et al. Oct 1999 A
5977913 Christ Nov 1999 A
5979703 Nystrom Nov 1999 A
5987105 Jenkins et al. Nov 1999 A
6012041 Brewer et al. Jan 2000 A
6031461 Lynn Feb 2000 A
6038331 Johnson Mar 2000 A
6065639 Maddox et al. May 2000 A
6125482 Foster Oct 2000 A
6130607 McClanahan et al. Oct 2000 A
6147607 Lynn Nov 2000 A
6175308 Tallman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191693 Sangsingkeow Feb 2001 B1
6211788 Lynn et al. Apr 2001 B1
6213424 Helfer-Grand Apr 2001 B1
6236317 Cohen et al. May 2001 B1
6236953 Segal May 2001 B1
6259956 Myers et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278372 Velasco, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279777 Goodin et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288641 Casais Sep 2001 B1
6314282 Weber et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331964 Barone Dec 2001 B1
6347724 Chen et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351223 DeWeerd et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360181 Gemmell et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368420 Angevaare et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375038 Daansen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392546 Smith May 2002 B1
6404837 Thompson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6417773 Vlahos et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426701 Levy et al. Jul 2002 B1
6476385 Albert Nov 2002 B1
6485979 Kippenhan et al. Nov 2002 B1
6523193 Saraya Feb 2003 B2
6524390 Jones Feb 2003 B1
6577240 Armstrong Jun 2003 B2
6611207 Yuan et al. Aug 2003 B1
6681003 Linder et al. Jan 2004 B2
6707873 Thompson et al. Mar 2004 B2
6727818 Wildman et al. Apr 2004 B1
6730024 Freyre et al. May 2004 B2
6749148 Helfer-Grand Jun 2004 B2
6759959 Wildman Jul 2004 B2
6778092 Braune Aug 2004 B2
6781523 Matsui et al. Aug 2004 B2
6792395 Roberts Sep 2004 B2
6799085 Crisp, III Sep 2004 B1
6807460 Black et al. Oct 2004 B2
6882278 Winings et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882315 Richley et al. Apr 2005 B2
6883563 Smith Apr 2005 B2
6893321 Buchanan et al. May 2005 B1
6897780 Ulrich et al. May 2005 B2
6917290 Land Jul 2005 B2
6919567 Iwasawa Jul 2005 B2
6950683 Hunt Sep 2005 B2
6956498 Gauthier et al. Oct 2005 B1
6975231 Lane et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977588 Schotz et al. Dec 2005 B2
7015816 Wildman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023341 Stilp Apr 2006 B2
7023356 Burkhardt et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042361 Kazdin et al. May 2006 B2
7056050 Sacks Jun 2006 B2
7067054 Fritze Jun 2006 B2
7069188 Roberts Jun 2006 B2
7075412 Reynolds et al. Jul 2006 B1
7099781 Heidl et al. Aug 2006 B1
7099856 Barangan et al. Aug 2006 B2
7117374 Hill et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119688 Wildman Oct 2006 B2
7119692 Leiffort et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142108 Diener et al. Nov 2006 B2
7154397 Zerhusen et al. Dec 2006 B2
7157045 McVey Jan 2007 B2
7187287 Ryal Mar 2007 B2
7191090 Cunningham Mar 2007 B1
7201005 Voglewede et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202780 Teller Apr 2007 B2
7236097 Cunningham Jun 2007 B1
7242306 Wildman et al. Jul 2007 B2
7242307 LeBlond Jul 2007 B1
7248933 Wildman Jul 2007 B2
7265673 Teller Sep 2007 B2
7266347 Gross Sep 2007 B2
7267531 Anderson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7271728 Taylor et al. Sep 2007 B2
7272537 Mogadam Sep 2007 B2
7286057 Bolling Oct 2007 B2
7292914 Jungmann et al. Nov 2007 B2
7293645 Harper et al. Nov 2007 B2
7315245 Lynn et al. Jan 2008 B2
7330108 Thomas Feb 2008 B2
7372367 Lane et al. May 2008 B2
7375640 Plost May 2008 B1
7400264 Boaz Jul 2008 B2
7408470 Wildman et al. Aug 2008 B2
7411511 Kennish et al. Aug 2008 B2
7423533 LeBlond et al. Sep 2008 B1
7425900 Lynn et al. Sep 2008 B2
7440620 Aartsen Oct 2008 B1
7443302 Reeder et al. Oct 2008 B2
7443305 Verdiramo Oct 2008 B2
RE40588 Ostendorf et al. Nov 2008 E
7450472 Guyvarch Nov 2008 B2
7457869 Kernan Nov 2008 B2
7474215 Scott et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477148 Lynn et al. Jan 2009 B2
7482936 Bolling Jan 2009 B2
7486193 Elwell Feb 2009 B2
7487538 Mok Feb 2009 B2
7490045 Flores et al. Feb 2009 B1
7496479 Garcia et al. Feb 2009 B2
7538680 Scott et al. May 2009 B2
7551092 Henry Jun 2009 B1
7597122 Smith Oct 2009 B1
7600137 Trappeniers et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605704 Munro et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611030 Reynolds et al. Nov 2009 B2
7616122 Bolling Nov 2009 B2
7718395 Carling May 2010 B2
7780453 Carling Aug 2010 B2
7785109 Carling Aug 2010 B2
7812730 Wildman et al. Oct 2010 B2
7978564 De La Huerga Jul 2011 B2
7982619 Bolling Jul 2011 B2
8020733 Snodgrass Sep 2011 B2
8026821 Reeder et al. Sep 2011 B2
8056768 Snodgrass Nov 2011 B2
8085155 Prodanovich et al. Dec 2011 B2
D654743 Rospierski Feb 2012 S
8212653 Goldstein et al. Jul 2012 B1
8237558 Seyed Momen et al. Aug 2012 B2
8240517 Stob et al. Aug 2012 B1
8258965 Reeder et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264343 Snodgrass Sep 2012 B2
8342365 Snodgrass Jan 2013 B2
8344893 Drammeh Jan 2013 B1
8350706 Wegelin et al. Jan 2013 B2
8368544 Wildman et al. Feb 2013 B2
8395515 Tokhtuev Mar 2013 B2
8400309 Glenn et al. Mar 2013 B2
8482406 Snodgrass Jul 2013 B2
8502680 Tokhtuev et al. Aug 2013 B2
8502681 Bolling et al. Aug 2013 B2
8525666 Melker et al. Sep 2013 B2
8558701 Wegelin et al. Oct 2013 B2
8564431 Snodgrass Oct 2013 B2
D693140 Rospierski Nov 2013 S
8587437 Kyle et al. Nov 2013 B2
8598996 Wildman et al. Dec 2013 B2
8633806 Amir Jan 2014 B2
8633816 Snodgrass et al. Jan 2014 B2
8646656 Johnson Feb 2014 B2
8674840 Snodgrass Mar 2014 B2
8783511 Snodgrass Jul 2014 B2
8823525 Cartner et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847752 Wegelin et al. Sep 2014 B2
8872665 Snodgrass Oct 2014 B2
8963721 Harris et al. Feb 2015 B2
8963723 Snodgrass Feb 2015 B2
9000930 Pelland et al. Apr 2015 B2
9047755 Bonner Jun 2015 B2
9117361 Hennigan et al. Aug 2015 B1
9159216 Limbert et al. Oct 2015 B2
9239361 Long Jan 2016 B2
9311809 Diaz Apr 2016 B2
9349274 Wegelin et al. May 2016 B2
9524632 Moore Dec 2016 B2
9633543 Wegelin et al. Apr 2017 B2
9633544 Wegelin et al. Apr 2017 B2
9633545 Wegelin et al. Apr 2017 B2
20010039501 Crevel et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047214 Cocking et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010053939 Crevel et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010054038 Crevel et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020000449 Armstrong Jan 2002 A1
20020019709 Segal Feb 2002 A1
20020050006 Saraya May 2002 A1
20020103671 Pederson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107744 Rosenberg et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020132343 Lum Sep 2002 A1
20020135486 Brohagen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020145523 Robaey Oct 2002 A1
20020175182 Matthews Nov 2002 A1
20020183979 Wildman Dec 2002 A1
20030030562 Lane et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065536 Hansen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074222 Rosow et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030182180 Zarrow Sep 2003 A1
20040001009 Winings et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015269 Jungmann et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040028608 Saul et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049369 Konicek et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040075347 Biskup, Sr. et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088076 Gardner, Jr. May 2004 A1
20040090333 Wildman et al. May 2004 A1
20040148196 Kalies Jul 2004 A1
20040150527 Harper et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040162850 Sanville et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050086341 Enga et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050102167 Kapoor May 2005 A1
20050134466 Tirkel Jun 2005 A1
20050149341 Eguchi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171634 York et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050222889 Lai et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060067545 Lewis et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060067546 Lewis et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071799 Verdiramo Apr 2006 A1
20060104245 Narayanaswami et al. May 2006 A1
20060132316 Wildman et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060139449 Cheng et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060140703 Sacks Jun 2006 A1
20060154642 Scannell, Jr. Jul 2006 A1
20060156415 Rubinstein et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060223731 Carling Oct 2006 A1
20060229821 Brossette et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060272361 Snodgrass Dec 2006 A1
20060273915 Snodgrass Dec 2006 A1
20070008146 Taylor et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070008147 Bolling Jan 2007 A1
20070008149 Bolling Jan 2007 A1
20070016466 Taylor Jan 2007 A1
20070020212 Bernal et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070029962 Saeki Feb 2007 A1
20070044819 Chan et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055483 Lee et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070056091 Bolton et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070069884 Waxman Mar 2007 A1
20070096930 Cardoso May 2007 A1
20070135866 Baker et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070182581 Elwell Aug 2007 A1
20070198067 Van den Heuvel et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070205861 Nair et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213877 Hart et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070222599 Coveley et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070229288 Ogrin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070247316 Wildman et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070257803 Munro et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070285277 Scott et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070290865 Lynn et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080001763 Raja et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080019489 Lynn Jan 2008 A1
20080019490 Lynn Jan 2008 A1
20080046278 Sanville et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080084315 Pittz Apr 2008 A1
20080087719 Sahud Apr 2008 A1
20080100441 Prodanovich et al. May 2008 A1
20080103636 Glenn et al. May 2008 A1
20080131332 Nguyen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177155 Hansen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080185540 Turner et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080189142 Brown et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193631 Kanamori et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080246599 Hufton et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266113 Kennish et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267408 Hsieh Oct 2008 A1
20080280380 Dietz et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080290112 Lynn Nov 2008 A1
20080303658 Melker et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090002644 Christensen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019552 McLaughlin et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030721 Garcia et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090049610 Heimbrock et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090051545 Koblasz Feb 2009 A1
20090068116 Arndt Mar 2009 A1
20090084407 Glenn et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090091458 Deutsch Apr 2009 A1
20090102681 Brennan, Jr. et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112360 Berg Apr 2009 A1
20090119142 Yenni et al. May 2009 A1
20090127282 Reynolds et al. May 2009 A1
20090138303 Seshadri May 2009 A1
20090195385 Huang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204256 Wegelin Aug 2009 A1
20090219131 Barnett et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090219172 Wilbrod Sep 2009 A1
20090224907 Sinha et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090224924 Thorp Sep 2009 A1
20090266842 Snodgrass Oct 2009 A1
20090267776 Glenn et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090272405 Barnhill et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090273477 Barnhill Nov 2009 A1
20090276239 Swart et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299787 Barnhill Dec 2009 A1
20090301523 Barnhill et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100050314 Oleyar et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094581 Cagle Apr 2010 A1
20100097224 Prodanovich et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100117836 Momen et al. May 2010 A1
20100125362 Canora et al. May 2010 A1
20100153374 LeBlond et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100164728 Plost Jul 2010 A1
20100188228 Hyland Jul 2010 A1
20100207767 Verdiramo Aug 2010 A1
20100231385 Melker et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100233020 Klaassen et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274640 Morey et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100315243 Tokhtuev et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100315244 Tokhtuev Dec 2010 A1
20100321180 Dempsey et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100326472 Glenn et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100328076 Kyle et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332022 Wegelin et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110030730 Lynn Feb 2011 A1
20110046921 Sahud Feb 2011 A1
20110057799 Taneff et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110063106 Snodgrass Mar 2011 A1
20110088809 Lin Apr 2011 A1
20110093313 LeBlond et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110121974 Tenarvitz et al. May 2011 A1
20110169645 Cartner et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110169646 Raichman Jul 2011 A1
20110193703 Payton et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110197921 Rubin et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110207402 Perkins et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110234598 Scarola et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110273298 Snodgrass et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110291840 Pelland et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110316701 Alper et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110316703 Butler et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320134 Butler et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120055986 Sahud Mar 2012 A1
20120062382 Taneff Mar 2012 A1
20120073604 Barnhill et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120112906 Borke et al. May 2012 A1
20120112914 Wegelin et al. May 2012 A1
20120140054 Chen et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158419 Nuthi Jun 2012 A1
20120187146 Chopra Jul 2012 A1
20120214879 Arndt Aug 2012 A1
20120245729 Wegelin et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120245951 Gips et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120256742 Snodgrass et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120310664 Long et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120329438 Snodgrass Dec 2012 A1
20130045685 Kiani Feb 2013 A1
20130048718 Tessier Feb 2013 A1
20130075346 Rumberger et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130076514 Wegelin et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130091631 Hayes et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130113931 Alper May 2013 A1
20130120120 Long et al. May 2013 A1
20130229276 Hunter Sep 2013 A1
20130234855 Knighton Sep 2013 A1
20130257615 Iseri et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130261795 Long et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130264355 Jodoin Oct 2013 A1
20130290016 Alper et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130306105 Battah Nov 2013 A1
20130333184 Couture et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342349 Cruz Dec 2013 A1
20140009292 Long et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140015670 Wegelin et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140070950 Snodgrass Mar 2014 A1
20140081653 Davis et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140214449 Long et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140253334 Hanlin et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279603 Ortiz et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140361898 Wegelin et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150022361 Gaisser et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150035678 Long Feb 2015 A1
20150048940 Keown et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150127365 Rizvi et al. May 2015 A1
20150134354 Alper et al. May 2015 A1
20150179047 Wallace et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150194043 Dunn et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150199883 Hartley et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150313422 Ophardt et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160093195 Ophardt Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (127)
Number Date Country
2015258158 Dec 2015 AU
2592814 Dec 2007 CA
2780411 Dec 2013 CA
101592510 Dec 2009 CN
201974318 Sep 2011 CN
202677403 Jan 2013 CN
69708606 Aug 2002 DE
69917795 Jul 2005 DE
19882120 Oct 2010 DE
102012105365 Dec 2013 DE
2015665 Nov 2009 DK
0921506 Jun 1999 EP
1121500 Oct 1999 EP
1245016 Oct 2000 EP
1099400 May 2001 EP
1201172 May 2002 EP
1791077 May 2004 EP
1390204 Dec 2004 EP
1034132 Aug 2005 EP
1794727 Sep 2005 EP
1483728 Oct 2006 EP
1872802 Jan 2008 EP
1872892 Jan 2008 EP
1913892 Apr 2008 EP
2223642 Sep 2010 EP
2511889 Oct 2010 EP
2509017 Oct 2012 EP
2637540 Sep 2013 EP
2872315 Dec 2005 FR
2997779 May 2014 FR
2137749 Oct 1984 GB
2217013 Oct 1989 GB
2299405 Feb 1996 GB
2324397 Oct 1998 GB
2337327 Nov 1999 GB
2340647 Feb 2000 GB
2394654 May 2004 GB
2417810 Mar 2006 GB
2417811 Mar 2006 GB
2425388 Oct 2006 GB
2446871 Aug 2007 GB
2437555 Oct 2007 GB
2439306 Dec 2007 GB
2439457 Dec 2007 GB
2452189 Feb 2009 GB
2474317 Apr 2011 GB
2486767 Jun 2012 GB
H01219439 Sep 1989 JP
10309540 Nov 1998 JP
2002197559 Jul 2002 JP
2003105819 Apr 2003 JP
2003122823 Apr 2003 JP
2006132277 May 2005 JP
2005218999 Aug 2005 JP
2006198318 Aug 2006 JP
2009282442 Dec 2009 JP
2013017631 Jan 2013 JP
2013180046 Sep 2013 JP
2013187557 Sep 2013 JP
882280 May 2002 PT
WO9213327 Aug 1992 WO
WO9731350 Aug 1997 WO
WO9809261 Mar 1998 WO
WO9836258 Aug 1998 WO
WO9930299 Jun 1999 WO
WO0022260 Apr 2000 WO
WO0133529 May 2001 WO
WO0221475 Mar 2002 WO
WO0294073 Nov 2002 WO
WO03079278 Sep 2003 WO
WO03082351 Oct 2003 WO
WO2005055793 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005055793 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005094711 Oct 2005 WO
WO2006036687 Apr 2006 WO
WO2006135922 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007001866 Jan 2007 WO
WO2007090470 Aug 2007 WO
WO 2007127495 Nov 2007 WO
WO2007129289 Nov 2007 WO
WO2007133960 Nov 2007 WO
WO2008088424 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2008118143 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2008119158 Oct 2008 WO
WO2008133495 Nov 2008 WO
WO 2009087046 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009097096 Aug 2009 WO
WO2009134242 Nov 2009 WO
WO2010026581 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010028320 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010034125 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010070072 Jun 2010 WO
WO 2010093349 Aug 2010 WO
WO 2010099488 Sep 2010 WO
WO2010101929 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010104564 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010118242 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2012148771 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2010143091 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2010143092 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011031774 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011038173 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011058293 May 2011 WO
WO2011062658 May 2011 WO
WO 2011072837 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011085292 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2011119695 Sep 2011 WO
WO2012064515 May 2012 WO
WO 2012178045 Dec 2012 WO
WO2013025889 Feb 2013 WO
WO2013025956 Feb 2013 WO
WO 2013033243 Mar 2013 WO
WO2013049357 Apr 2013 WO
WO 2013049462 Apr 2013 WO
WO 2013055616 Apr 2013 WO
WO 2013058821 Apr 2013 WO
WO 2013063690 May 2013 WO
WO 2013070888 May 2013 WO
WO 2013074660 May 2013 WO
WO 2013140253 Sep 2013 WO
WO 2013165585 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014027030 Feb 2014 WO
WO2014037938 Mar 2014 WO
WO2014046645 Mar 2014 WO
WO 2014060726 Apr 2014 WO
WO 2014205283 Dec 2014 WO
WO2015061718 Apr 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (66)
Entry
Al-Hamad et al., “How Clean is Clean? Proposed Methods for Hospital Cleaning Assessment,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 70, Oct. 9, 2008, pp. 328-334.
Anonymous et al., “Hand Hygiene,” Progressive Grocer, vol. 76, No. 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 111-112.
Bourn, Auditor General for Wales, “The Management and Delivery of Hospital Cleaning Services in Wales,” National Audit Office Wales, 39 pp., May 23, 2003.
Dancer, “How do we Assess Hospital Cleaning? A Proposal for Microbiological Standards for Surface Hygiene in Hospitals” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 56, Sep. 2003, pp. 10-15.
Diller et al., “Estimation of hand hygiene opportunities on an adult medical ward using 24-hour camera surveillance: Validation of the HOW2 Benchmark Study,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 42, 2014 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2014, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) pp. 602-607.
Dix et al., “Environmental Surface Cleaning: First Defense Against Infectious Agents,” Infection Control Today Magazine, 6 pp., Dec. 1, 2005.
Elliott, “Determining Three Metrics for Cleaning Satisfaction,” found at http://www.facilitiesnet.com/fn/article.asp?id-7698, equipmentrentaltools/article/Determining-Three-Metrics-for -Cleaning-Satisfaction—7698#, Nov. 2007, 2 pp.
Evaluating Municipal Services: Scorecard Cleanliness Program Prospectus, New York, found at http://www.worldsweeper.com/Street/Profiles/NYCScorecard.pdf, archived Jan. 5, 2009, 16 pp.
Exner et al., “Household Cleaning and Surface Disinfection: New Insights and Strategies,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 56, 2008, pp. s70-s75.
Florida Department of Health, “Guidelines for Control of Antibiotic Resistant Organisms,” Dec. 20, 1999, 34 pp.
Griffith et al., “An Evaluation of Hospital Cleaning Regimes and Standards,” J. Hosp. Infect., vol. 45, pp. 19-28, 2000, accepted Dec. 23, 1999.
Griffith et al., “The Effectiveness of Existing and Modified Cleaning Regimens in a Welsh Hospital,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 66, Jul. 26, 2007, pp. 352-359.
Griffith, “Nosocomial infection: Are there lessons from the food industry?” The Biomedical Scientist, pp. 697-699, Aug. 2006.
Hamilton et al., “Hand Hygiene,” Wild Iris Medical Education, Inc., 2014, (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2014, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 24 pp.
“Hand Washing, Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care,” Infection Control Guidelines, Canada Communicable Disease Report, vol. 24S8, Dec. 1998, 66 pp.
“Measuring Hand Hygiene Adherence: Overcoming the Challenges,” The Joint Commission et al., 2009 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2009, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 234 pp.
Larson, “APIC Guideline for Hand Washing and Hand Antisepsis in Health-Care Settings*,” APIC Guidelines Committee, 1995, (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 1995, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.), Am J Infect Control, 23:251, 18 pp.
Larson et al., “A Multifaceted Approach to Changing Handwashing Behavior,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 25, Feb. 1997, pp. 3-10.
Lewis et al., “A Modified ATP Benchmark for Evaluating the Cleaning of Some Hospital Environmental Surfaces,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 69, May 12, 2008, pp. 156-163.
Malik et al., “Use of Audit Tools to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cleaning Systems in Hospitals,” Am. J. Infect. Control, vol. 31, No. 3, p. 181-187, May 2003.
Mallow General Hospital, “Hygiene Services Assessment Scheme, Assessment Report,” 38 pp., Oct. 2007.
Mangram et al., “Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 20, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 247-278.
Meengs et al., “Hand Washing Frequency in an Emergency Department,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 23, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 1307-1312.
Mills et al., “Guidelines for Working with Rodents Potentially Infected with Hantavirus,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 76, No. 3, Aug. 1995, pp. 716-722.
CDC, HICPAC, “Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Recommendations and Reports, (MMWR)vol. 51, No. RR-16, Oct. 25, 2002, 56 pp.
Munro et al., “Treating Exposure to Chemical Warfare Agents: Implications for Health Care Providers and Community Emergency Planning,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 89, 1990 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 1990, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) pp. 205-2015.
“Net/Tech to Unveil Patented Hygiene Guard Hand-Washing Monitoring System at the National Restaurant Show,” BusinessWire, Apr. 3, 1997, 3 pp.
Ophardt, Hygiene-Technik GmbH+ Co. KG, “Making the World a More Hygienic Place”, Hygiene Compliance Solutions, 2009, 1 page.
Pittet et al., “Compliance with Handwashing in a Teaching Hospital,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 130, No. 2, Jan. 19, 1999, pp. 126-130.
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl No. 12/787,064, dated Dec. 6, 2012 through Apr. 8, 2013, 20 pp.
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 12/787,097, dated Jun. 4, 2012 through Nov. 7, 2012, 21 pp.
Quattrin, Md. et al., “Application of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points to Control Surgical Site Infections in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty,” Orthopedics 31:132, 6 pp., 2008, SLACK Incorporated.
SaferCorp, LLC, “SaferCorp Life Advantage Solutions presents SaferHands™ Hospital Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring System”, retrieved electronically from http://www.guardianics.com/ on Dec. 15, 2010, 14 pp.
SaferCorp, LLC, Guardian™ Automated Infection Control Systems (GAICS), Feb. 6, 2010, 4 pp.
Sax et al., “My five moments for hand hygiene: a user-centered design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 67, Aug. 27, 2007, pp. 9-21.
Semmelweis, “The Etiology, Concept, and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever,” The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 1983, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 14 pp.
Steed et al., “Hospital Hand Hygiene Opportunities: Where and When (HOW2)? The HOW2 Benchmark Study,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 39, Feb. 2011, 8 pp.
Sturman et al., “Cornell University Hospitality Report: A New Method for Measuring Housekeeping Performance Consistency,” CHR Reports, vol. 6, No. 11, Sep. 2006, 15 pp.
Swoboda et al., “Electronic Monitoring and Voice Prompts Improve Hand Hygiene and Decrease Nosocomial Infections in an Intermediate Care Unit,” Crit Care Med, vol. 32, No. 2, 2004 (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2004, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, Jan. 13, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) pp. 358-363.
Taylor, An Evaluation of Handwashing Techniques-1, Nursing Times, vol. 74, Jan. 12, 1978, pp. 54-55.
Thompson et al., “Handwashing and Glove Use in a Long-Term-Care Facility,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 18, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 97-103.
Tibballs et al., “Teaching Hospital Medical Staff to Handwash,” The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 164, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1996, pp. 395-398.
Van Ryzin et al., “Measuring Street Cleanliness: A Comparison of New York City's Scorecard and Results from a Citizen Survey,” Public Administration Review 68(2), Mar./Apr. 2008, pp. 295-303.
Yoshikura, “Workflow from Clean to Dirty, HACCP and Inclusiveness Principles in Effective Implementation of Hospital Infection Control,” Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 53, Jun. 6, 2000, 2 pp.
Watanakunakorn et al., “An Observational Study of Hand Washing and Infection Control Practices by Healhcare Workers,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiolgy, vol. 19, No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 858-860.
“WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (Advanced Draft),” World Health Organization, Apr. 2006, 216 pp.
“WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care,” World Health Organization, 2009 (Applicant points out, in accorace with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2009, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, 2017, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.) 270 pp.
“Evidence of hand hygiene to reduce transmission and infections by multi-drug resistant organisms in health-care settings,” World Health Organization, Jan. 5, 2014, 7 pp.
Zuhlsdorf et al., “Cleaning Efficacy of Nine Different Cleaners in a Washer-Disinfector Designed for Flexible Endoscopes,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 52, Oct. 9, 2002, pp. 206-211.
“Don't Get Caught Dirty Handed,” ASM's Microbes Afterhours, Sep. 6, 2009, 11 pp.
“America's Dirty Little Secret: Second Handwashing Survey Reveals Americans Still Don't Get It,” American Society for Microbiology, Sep. 19, 2000, 3 pp.
Garner et al., “Guideline for Handwashing and Hospital Environmental Control,” CDC Prevention Guidelines, Jan. 1, 1985, 10 pp.
Garner, “Guidelines for Isolation Precautions in Hospitals,” Hospital Infection Control Advisory Committee, Jan. 1, 1996, 39 pp.
Hicpac, “Recommendations for Preventing the Spread of Vancomycin Resistance,” Morbidity and CDC Mortality Weekly Report, Recommendations and Reports, vol. 44, No. RR-12, 1-13, Sep. 22, 1995, 16 pp.
“Dr. Semmelweiss Was Right: Washing Hands Prevents Infection,” Water Quality and Health Council, retrieved from www.waterandhealth.org/newsletter/new/4/12/2017/right.htm, Feb. 2017, 2 pp.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/437,466 by David L. Snodgrass, filed Jan. 28, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/486,491 by David L. Snodgrass, filed May 16, 2011.
“Bentley WiNET Tag User Guide—FAS1503, DOC1036,” UltraClenz, Jan. 25, 2011, 12 pp.
“ProGiene System Description for UL and CE Mark Approval,” UltraClenz, Feb. 8, 2002, 5 pp.
Green, “Hand hygiene in 2015: 7 Findings,” retrieved from http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality!hand-hygiene-i n-2015-7-findings.htm l?tm pl=component&print= 1 &layout=default&page=, Nov. 12, 2015, 1 pp.
“3M and Patient Care Technology Systems Collaborate on State of-the-Art Automated Hand Hygiene Solution to Improve Compliance,” retrieved from http://news.3m.com/pt/press-release/company/3m-and-patient-care-technology, on Apr. 13, 2017, 2 pp.
Sahud et al., “An Electronic Hand Hygiene Surveillance Device: A Pilot Study Exploring Surrogate Makers for Hand Hygiene Compliance,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 31, No. 6, Jun. 2010, 6 pp.
Swedberg, “RFID-based Hand-Hygiene System Prevents Health-Care Acquired Infections,” RFID Journal, Jun. 10, 2010, 2 pp.
“Patient Safeguard System Healthcare Worker Badge User's Guide,” DOC1046 Revision 8, UltraClenz, Mar. 14, 2012, 21 pp.
Levchenko et al., “Embedded System for Hygiene Compliance Monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 7, No. 3, Jul. 2010, 4 pp.
Tsai et al., “iMAT: Intelligent Medication Administration Tools,” Aug. 2010, 8 pp.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170200360 A1 Jul 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61756791 Jan 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14164930 Jan 2014 US
Child 15406129 US