This disclosure relates generally to wireless communications, and more particularly to a system and method for detecting and reducing sideband noise and carrier leakage.
A wireless communications system typically includes a transmitter and a receiver for sending signals over carrier waves. The transmitter modulates information, such as voice, text, image, audio, and video data, onto a carrier before sending it to the receiver. The receiver demodulates the received signals to recover the original information. One of the typically used modulation schemes is IQ modulation, where I and Q represent in-phase and quadrature parts of a modulated signal. The IQ modulation is an efficient way of sending information, particularly in digital formats.
There are various factors that can cause the transmitter to generate imperfect modulated output signals. For example, in a quadrature modulation scheme, IQ imbalance, which occurs when there are different amplitude and phase distortions in I and Q channels, is one of the widely-recognized factors causing imperfect signals. The IQ imbalance induces sideband noise, which is essentially an image frequency interference “aliasing” into a desired signal band. The sideband noise degrades signal reception in a wireless communications system. The IQ imbalance has become a crucial issue as higher-level modulations appear in communications standards and low-cost, direct-conversion transmitters and receivers are increasingly employed in wireless communications systems.
Another typical factor causing imperfect signals is the hardware-induced carrier leakage. The carrier leakage, which is at the same frequency as the carrier, is often induced by the limited isolation between the carrier and output ports of the transmitter. On an IQ plane, a modulated signal with carrier leakage appears with a fixed offset vector.
Conventional solutions to combat carrier leakage rely on implementation of additional circuitry. The solutions for IQ imbalance are usually based on cancellation of the sideband noise in the transmitter, which also require additional circuitry or manufacturing calibration. For example, one can detect the sideband noise and carrier leakage by sampling an output signal, and minimize the same through hardware calibration. The signal sampling can be performed by using a testing receiver to detect output signals from a device under a test (DUT) transmitter.
One drawback of the conventional solutions is that the carrier leakage and sideband noise generated by the DUT transmitter cannot be distinguished from those generated by the testing receiver. This prevents an accurate calibration of the sideband noise and carrier leakage for the DUT transmitter.
As such, what is needed is a detection scheme to identify the sideband noise and carrier leakage of the DUT transmitter apart from those of the testing receiver.
Disclosed herein is a wireless communications system with reduced sideband noise and carrier leakage. In the system, at least one transmitter modulates at least one input signal with a first carrier to generate a modulated output signal, and at least one receiver receives the modulated output signal and demodulates the same with a second carrier to generate at least one demodulated output signal. The first and second carriers are at difference frequencies, such that the sideband noise and carrier leakage generated by different sources can be distinguished.
The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objectives and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Fout=Fc+If
where If is the frequency of intermediate carrier. In the case where the direct conversion architecture is used (base band I and Q signals are directly converted to RF carrier), If is zero.
The conventional system 100 can detect the sideband noise and carrier leakage by sampling the output signal, and then minimizes their magnitudes using hardware calibration. The frequency of the output signals from the testing receiver 120 should be the same as that of the output signal from the DUT transmitter 110. The frequency spectrum of the output signals from the testing receiver 120 usually contains various unwanted frequency components, such as the carrier leakage of the transmitter 110, carrier leakage of the receiver 120, sideband noise of the transmitter 110 corresponding to its input signal, sideband noise of the receiver 120 corresponding to its input signal, sideband noise of the receiver 120 corresponding to the carrier leakage of the transmitter 110, sideband noise of the receiver 120 corresponding to the sideband noise of the transmitter 110 that is corresponding to its input signal.
One drawback of the conventional system is its inability to distinguish the sideband noise and carrier leakage induced by the DUT transmitter from those induced by the testing receiver, because the carriers of the transmitter and receiver have the same frequency.
In this embodiment, the carrier frequency Fc2 used by the testing receiver 220 is different from the carrier frequency Fc1 used by the DUT transmitter 210. In the system 200, the frequency spectrum of the output signal from the testing receiver 220 contains the input signal and carrier leakage of the transmitter 210, and the sideband noise of the transmitter 210 corresponding to its input signal, the carrier leakage of the receiver 220, the sideband noise of the receiver 220 corresponding to its input signal, the sideband noise of the receiver 220 corresponding to the carrier leakage of the transmitter 210, the sideband noise of the receiver 220 corresponding to the sideband noise of the transmitter 210 that is corresponding to its input signal. Due to the difference between the carrier frequencies Fc1 and Fc2, the sideband noise and carrier leakage of the DUT transmitter 210 can be distinguished from those of the testing receiver 220 as shown below.
As shown in graph 404, the carrier leakage of the transmitter (C1) is offset from the carrier leakage of the testing receiver (C2) by a certain value, and the sideband noise of the transmitter (N1) is offset from the sideband noise of the receiver (N2) by a certain value. This is due to the fact that the carriers of the transmitter and receiver have different frequencies. Thus, the sideband noise and carrier leakage of the DUT transmitter can be specifically identified, and therefore minimized by software calibration. For instance, one can use the detected frequency spectrum to reduce the sideband noise. Similarly, the detected frequency spectrum can be used to suppress the carrier leakage. The above described test and adjustment procedure can be carried out during actual functioning of the transmitter, particularly when the transmitter is a base station. Such real-time calibration can be applied at some periodic time instances while the base station is functioning. The period of above calibration is quite short and it is solely for the purpose of tracking any temporal change in the characteristics of IQ imbalance and carrier leakage.
The proposed system has the following advantages. The carrier leakage and sideband noise of the DUT transmitter and testing receiver can be distinguished. This allows accurate monitoring of the imperfect characteristics of the DUT transmitter, regardless of the testing receiver. Adjusting the difference between the carrier frequencies for the transmitter and the receiver changes the observation windows for the carrier leakage and sideband noise. Since the carrier leakage and sideband noise of various sources are clearly identified, they can be suppressed by software solutions without requiring any manufacture calibration or any additional circuitry. The proposed scheme can be carried out real-time on a periodic basis in order to track any temporal characteristics of the IQ imbalance and carrier leakage. This can be done by assigning a negligible portion of time to the real time calibration.
To further improve the robustness of the detection, one could adjust the differences between the carrier frequencies for the DUT transmitter and the testing receiver in such a way that the carrier leakages and side band noises of the transmitter and the receiver would fall uniformly in separated non-overlapping regions on the frequency spectrum. The values used for software calibration will be the averaged values of signal strength over each region.
The above description is by way of example only.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in one or more specific examples, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.
The present application claims the benefits of U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 60/748,456, which was filed on Dec. 7, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20030171110 | Shi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206603 | Husted | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060034356 | Fechtel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070127561 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60748456 | Dec 2005 | US |