Wireless device detection using multiple antennas separated by an RF shield

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9172477
  • Patent Number
    9,172,477
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 14, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 27, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system comprising one or more interior antenna(s) positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine and one or more exterior antenna(s) positioned on an external portion of the human operated machine, with a radio frequency shield positioned between the interior antenna(s) and the exterior antenna(s), is usable with a processing module electrically connected with the antennas for analyzing signals received from the antennas to determine whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field


This disclosure relates to an apparatus, system, and method for detecting the transmission of wireless devices in human operated machinery.


2. Background and Relevant Art


As mobile devices have increased in popularity and features, accidents involving distracted drivers have also increased. Substantial efforts have been made to educate the public regarding the dangers of distracted driving and to prevent drivers from using mobile devices while driving. Some jurisdictions have gone so far as to enact laws prohibiting the use of wireless devices while driving. Similarly, many companies have implemented policies that strictly prohibit the use of mobile devices while operating company machinery, such as cars, mining equipment, or other similar machines.


One difficulty in implementing such policies is the inability of organizations to determine whether the operators are actually using mobile devices while operating vehicles or other machinery. While some systems have been developed to detect the use of mobile devices, these systems have been unable to distinguish whether the mobile device is being used within the operator area of the vehicle or other machinery. In particular, it can be difficult to distinguish between mobile phone use within a vehicle or machine and mobile phone use near the vehicle or machine.


As one will understand, implementing effective policies that restrict the use of wireless devices within human operated machinery is made more difficult by the inability to identify violations of the policy. Accordingly, there is a need for systems, apparatus, or methods that can accurately determine whether a mobile device is being used and in some instances, whether the device is simply ‘on’ or ‘active’ within a vehicle or some other type of human operated machinery.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention comprise systems, methods, and apparatus configured to detect whether an RF transmission comes from a cellular or other RF transmitting device and whether that transmission comes from within or outside of a defined space. In some embodiments, the transmission or other operation of a wireless device is detectable within an operator area of human operated machinery. In particular, embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus, systems, and methods for determining whether a detected radio signal originates from within the operator's area of the human operated machinery or from a location outside of the operators area. For example, systems described herein provide embodiments for determining whether a radio signal is being generated and transmitted from within the cab of a vehicle or from a source outside of the vehicle.


An example embodiment can include an apparatus and/or system used for determining whether an operator of machinery is using a mobile device. The apparatus and/or system can comprise one or more interior or first antenna(s) positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine. One or more external or second antenna(s) can be positioned on an external portion of the human operated machine. Additionally, a radio frequency shield can be positioned between the first/interior antenna(s) and the second/exterior antenna(s).


When the shield provides only partial reduction of the signal transmission magnitude emitted from within a vehicle or machinery operator area, the signals detected by both the interior and exterior antennas are correlated to confirm that the signals correspond to a same transmission from a single mobile device. Then, the signal strength detected at the antennas for the various signals that are determined to correspond to the same transmission are analyzed to determine whether the transmission emitted from within or outside of the operator area, as described herein. For example, it can be determined that the transmission originated from within the operator area when the signal strength detected by the interior antenna(s) for the transmission is stronger than the signal strength detected by the exterior antenna(s) for the same transmission.


When the shield provides sufficient reduction of the RF signal transmissions such that the RF signal transmission cannot be detected above the ambient RF noise emitted from within the operator area, the composite signals detected at the different antennas can also be comparatively used to determine whether a particular signal is emitted from within the operator area, as described herein.


A processing module in electrical communication with the first and second antennas compares the signals received from the first and second antennas. The processing module can then determine, based upon the comparisons of the first and second signals, whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.


Additionally, embodiments of the invention can also include one or more corresponding methods for detecting the transmission or active ‘on’ status of a radio frequency generating device within an operator area of a human operated machine.


In embodiments where the shielding provides only partial attenuation, the methods of the invention can include detecting the signals detected by both the interior and exterior antennas and correlating signals that correspond to a same transmission from a single mobile device. Then, the methods can include comparing the signal strength of correlated signals to determine whether the transmission emitted from within or outside of the operator area, wherein it is determined that the transmission originated from within the operator area when the signal strength detected by the interior antenna(s) for the transmission is stronger than the signal strength detected by the exterior antenna(s) for the same transmission.


The methods of the invention can also include, for full attenuation shielding, receiving, at a processing module, a first composite signal from a first antenna positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine. These methods can also include receiving, at the processing module, a second composite signal from a second antenna positioned exterior to the at least partially enclosed operator area of the human operated machine. Additionally, a radio frequency attenuator can be positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna. The methods can further include comparing the first composite signal received from the first antenna and the second composite signal received from the second antenna, and then determining, based upon the comparison of the first composite signal and the second composite signal, whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.


Additional features and advantages of exemplary embodiments of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of such exemplary embodiments. The features and advantages of such embodiments may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of such exemplary embodiments as set forth hereinafter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the invention can be obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified schematic of a system for wireless device detection using multiple antennas separated by a radio frequency shield;



FIG. 2A illustrates an embodiment of the system of FIG. 1 within a car;



FIG. 2B illustrates a close-up view of a feature of the system depicted in FIG. 2A;



FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of the system of FIG. 2A, including example signals;



FIG. 4 illustrates another schematic of the system of FIG. 2A, including example signals;



FIG. 5 describes a method for using multiple antennas separated by a radio frequency attenuator to detect use of a wireless device;



FIG. 6A describes a method for using correlating signals detected by a first and second antenna; and



FIG. 6B describes another method for using correlating signals detected by a first and second antenna.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention extends to systems, methods, and apparatus configured to detect whether an RF transmission comes from a cellular or other RF transmitting device and whether that transmission comes from within or outside of a defined space. In some embodiments, the transmission or other operation of a wireless device is detectable within an operator area of human operated machinery. In particular, embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus, systems, and methods for determining whether a detected radio signal originates from within the operator's area of the human operated machinery or from a location outside of the operators area. For example, systems described herein provide embodiments for determining whether a radio signal is being generated and transmitted from within the cab of a vehicle or from a source outside of the vehicle.


Some existing systems have attempted to detect the location of a mobile device relative to a vehicle based on a detected power of the signal emitted from the mobile device, as detected by one or more receiving antennas. However, this is problematic for several reasons. For example, mobile devices can be serviced by several different providers, and each mobile device will typically only communicate with the communication towers associated with the respective service providers. The further the mobile devices are positioned from the towers, the more signaling power is typically required and utilized by the mobile devices. As such, multiple mobile devices may be present within a relatively confined area, and each device may be transmitting at significantly different power levels based upon the distance between each mobile device and its respective service provider's tower.


Furthermore, the radio signals emitted from mobile devices will reflect off of various surfaces of the vehicle/machinery so that the receiving antenna(s) will detect multiple instances of the same signals at various attenuated or intensified power levels. This multi-path effect is similar to an echo reverberating in a canyon, such that in such a small confined space it is practically impossible to detect the exact location of the originating source. The foregoing problem is even further exacerbated when multiple mobile devices are utilized at the same time within a relatively close proximity.


Accordingly, for at least the foregoing reasons, it can be difficult to detect the location of an emitted mobile device RF signal based solely on the detected power of that emitted RF signal.


By way of example, a trucking company may desire to enforce no-phone policies within their truck fleet. However, it will be appreciated that the monitored truck may be surrounded by other vehicles or pedestrians that are using their own mobile phones while that monitored truck drives within a city or on a highway. Radio frequencies from each of these mobile phones may enter into and travel through the operator area of the truck at various power levels. As such, simply detecting the presence of radio frequencies within the cab of the truck may be insufficient to determine whether a mobile phone is being used within the truck. Additionally, numerous false positives may be detected, potentially resulting in a truck driver being inappropriately reprimanded.


As such, at least one embodiment described herein, provides a system for distinguishing between RF transmissions that originate from within the operator area of a machine and those that originate from outside of the operator area. In at least one embodiment, a first antenna is placed within the operator area of the machine, and a second antenna is placed external to the operator area. As defined herein, the term “operator area” refers to any area of a vehicle or machinery, including human operated devices, wherein a human operator can be positioned. The operator area is preferably constrained by a frame and is at least partially enclosed. The operator area can also include controls for controlling the vehicle or machinery. However, in this regard, it will be appreciated that the operator area can also include passenger area where a passenger can be positioned during operation of the vehicle or machinery. In some instance, the operator area is very large, such as in a multi-person transport vehicle. In other instances, the operator area is more constrained, such as the cabin of a crane or tractor.


It will be appreciated that the term vehicle and machinery are interchangeable and can refer to any device or other machine that is capable of moving or performing a mechanical process while a person is positioned within the operator area of the machine. For example, a vehicle or machine can refer to a car, a crane, a bulldozer, a mining shovel, a boat, an airplane, or any number of other similar devices or machines.


A radio frequency (RF) attenuator or shield is positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna. As referenced within this application, the ‘RF shield’ and ‘RF attenuator’ are interchangeably used to describe any material, component or medium, either active or inactive, that measurably reduces the signal strength of a radio signal. For example, in at least one embodiment, an RF shield can comprise an electrically conductive material or medium such as a metallic sheet, metallic fabric, metallic screen, metallic paint, or any other electrically conductive material or medium, including highly conductive non-metallic materials. Intentionally or unintentionally positioning an RF shield between the first antenna and the second antenna will, at least to some extent, electromagnetically isolate the antennas from each other such that a signal originating within an operator area will be measurably stronger at the first antenna within an operator area (on an inner side of the RF shield) than at the second antenna positioned outside of the operator area (on an outer side of the RF shield). In some embodiments, the RF shield can provide substantially complete attenuation of signals emitted from the operator area or only partial attenuation of the signals emitted from the operator area.


Some embodiments of the invention also correlate detected transmission from a mobile device with operation of the vehicle/machinery where the mobile device is being utilized. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention can determine whether a machine/vehicle is being operated while a mobile device is ‘powered on, transmitting RF signals, and is located inside or within the operator area of the machine or vehicle’.



FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified schematic of a system for wireless device detection using multiple antennas separated by a radio frequency shield. As depicted, a first antenna 100 and a second antenna 110 are in communication with a processing unit 130. The processing unit 130 may communicate with a remote computing system 140 through mutual antennas 132, 142. Additionally, an RF shield 120 separates the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110.


The processing unit 130 and the remote computing system 140 each include one or more respective hardware processors and system memory or other storage devices having stored computer-executable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, implement the processes described herein, for differentiating whether a signal transmission originates from within or external to an operator area. The processing unit 130 and/or remote computing system 140 can each perform all or any limited portion of the processing required for performing the differentiation described herein. Each of the processing unit 130 and the remote computing system 140 can be a stand-alone computer device or a distributed computing system that incorporates a plurality of other computing devices. While the foregoing embodiment refers to wireless communication between the antennas and the processing unit 130, it will be appreciated that the data received from each antenna can be sent to the remote computing system 140 via one or more wired or wireless communication channels for the comparative analysis to be performed by the remote computing system 140.


In at least one embodiment, the processing unit 130 performs signal analysis to determine whether a detected radio signal is generated from within an operator area of a machine or if the detected radio signal is generated from outside the operator area. The processing unit 130 may also be configured to issue mentoring messages within the operator area, such as to turn the wireless device off, to turn the machine off (or otherwise influence the operation of the machine), and/or to prepare a report on the detected radio signal. The prepared report can either be saved locally for later download or transmitted to the remote computing system 140 for access by a third party. The processing unit 130 can also transmit the report to the remote computing system 140 in real-time or at some other time interval. In alternate embodiments, the processing unit 130 performs basic signal analysis on the detected signal and transmits data to the remote computing system 140 for the further processing described herein.



FIG. 2A illustrates an embodiment of the system of FIG. 1 within a car 200. In particular, a first antenna 100 is attached to the ceiling within the car cab, and a second antenna 110 is attached to the roof of the car 200 on the outside of the operator area. Additionally, a processing unit 130 is positioned within the trunk or any other area of the car 200. The processing unit is in communication with the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 through a wired connection and/or through one or more wireless communication media. The processing unit 130 may also be in further communication with a remote computing system (not shown), such as remote computing system 140, referenced above.


In at least one embodiment, the roof of the car 200 functions as the RF shield 120. In some instances, the vehicle's roof is not constructed of a material or medium that sufficiently attenuates the RF transmissions originating from within that vehicle. In those instances, a material or medium can be introduced between antenna 100 and antenna 110 such that the additional material or medium can function as an RF shield. In some embodiments, the base or mounting plate of the first and/or second antenna is configured with a sufficient size and material property to effectively operate as the RF shield.


It will be appreciated that the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 can be positioned in locations other than those depicted in FIG. 2A. For example, the second antenna 110 can be attached to the bottom of the car, the side of the car, the hood of the car, or some other part of the car that is separated from the first antenna by one or more RF shield(s). Furthermore, the first antenna can comprise any quantity of one or more interior antennas positioned within the operator area and the second antenna can comprise any quantity of two or more exterior antennas positioned outside of the operator area. In any case, at least one RF shield at least partially isolates the first antenna(s) 100 from the second antenna(s) 110 in a direction relative to a signal emitted from the operator area.


It will also be appreciated that the first antenna(s) 100 and the second antenna(s) 110 can be of the same antenna type or of different antenna types. By way of example, and not limitation, in the case that both antennas are of the same type, the first antenna and the second antenna may both be omnidirectional. In contrast, in the case that the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 are of a different type, the first antenna 100 can comprise a directional antenna, while the second antenna can comprise an omnidirectional antenna. Though only a couple of antenna types are mentioned herein, one will understand that the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 can comprise a variety of different antenna types and still function as described.


In addition to not being limited to a particular antenna type, one will understand that the depiction of a car in FIG. 2A is not meant to limit the claimed system to a vehicle. For example, embodiments of the depicted system can be implemented in heavy equipment, like tractors, mining machinery, cranes, other construction equipment, busses, trucks, trains, trollies, trams, ferries, boats, ships, airplanes, or within any other human operated machine that has an at least partially enclosed operator area. As such the present invention provides a flexible platform that can be implemented in a variety of different settings to provide wireless detection.



FIG. 2B depicts a close-up view of the first antenna, second antenna, and RF shield of FIG. 2A. Additionally, FIG. 2B includes an external mobile phone 210 that is outside of the operator area of the car 200 and an internal mobile phone 220 that is inside the operator area of the car 200. Also depicted are four rays 212, 214, 222, and 224, each representing a component of a corresponding radio signal that is at least partially directed towards a respective antenna 100, 110. One will understand that radio signals do not behave as rays when being broadcast. In FIG. 2B, however, for the sake of clarity and simplicity, rays are used to indicate a radio signal travelling in a particular direction, and in some cases, being prevented from traveling in specific directions.


In the depicted example, the external mobile phone 210 may be associated with a pedestrian talking on a phone as the car 200 from FIG. 2A passes. As depicted, both the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 detect the radio signals from the external mobile phone 210. In particular, as depicted by ray 212 and ray 214, the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 may both receive signals of similar strength and composition from the external mobile phone 210. The signal 214 received by the first antenna 100 may be slightly attenuated by a windshield, window, or some other body component of the car 200. But, in at least one embodiment, the signals received by the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 110 from the external mobile phone 210 are identifiably similar in strength/power.


Also depicted in FIG. 2B, the internal mobile phone 220 is broadcasting ray 222 directed towards the second antenna 110 and ray 224 directed towards the first antenna 100. Notably, ray 222 and ray 224 correspond to a same signal transmission. In this case, however, the RF shield 120 blocks, either completely or partially, the radio signal (222) being broadcast towards the second antenna 110. As such, the first antenna 100 receives a strong reading of the radio signal (224) being broadcast by the internal mobile phone 220 and a reading of the radio signal (214) being broadcast by the external mobile phone 210. In contrast, the second antenna 110 receives a reading of the radio signal (212) being broadcast by the external mobile device 210, but little or no reading of the radio signal (222) being broadcast by the internal mobile device 220. Rays 212 and 214 correspond to a same signal transmission, whereas rays 212 and 214 do not correspond to the same signal transmission or device as rays 222 and 224. While FIG. 2B depicts only a single internal mobile phone 220 and a single external mobile phone 210, the described system can function with multiple mobile phones either inside or outside the operator area corresponding to many different signal transmissions.



FIG. 3 illustrates one example of a schematic of the system described above in FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B. In addition to system components, the FIG. 3 depicts example signals 340, 350, 360 at different stages of the system. For example, the first antenna 100 receives composite signal 340 and the second antenna 110 receives composite signal 350. Composite signal 340 comprises a signal received from the internal mobile phone 220 and the exterior mobile phone 210. Composite signal 350, on the other hand, comprises a signal from the external mobile phone 210 and includes little or no signal from the internal mobile phone 220.


Both composite signals received by the first antenna 100 and the second antenna 310 can be passed through filters 300, 310. In particular, the filters 300, 310 can include band pass filters that are configured to filter out radio frequencies that do not relate to devices of interest. For example, the filters 300, 310 can be configured to pass through frequencies related to Wi-Fi, cellular phone use, Bluetooth use, and other frequencies of interest, but ignore and/or filter out frequencies related to AM and FM radio transmission, television transmission, and other similar frequencies that are not related to devices of interest. As depicted in FIG. 3, a dotted box surrounds the portion of each composite signal 340, 350 that the band pass filter is centered around.


In at least one embodiment after filtering, corresponding to full attenuation shielding, the composite signal from the second antenna 110 can be subtracted from the composite signal from the first antenna 100. Subtracting the composite 350 signal from the second antenna 110 from the composite signal 340 received by the first antenna 100 will cause the similar signal components detected by the second antenna 110 to be removed from the same signal components detected by the first antenna 100. Accordingly, with reference to FIG. 2B, if the second antenna only detected the signal from the external mobile phone 210, while the first antenna detected a signal from both the external mobile phone 210 and the internal mobile phone 200, subtracting the composite signal received by the second antenna 110 from the composite signal received by the first antenna 100 will result in a signal that corresponds to the signal broadcast by the internal mobile phone 220. FIG. 3 depicts the resulting signal as signal 360.


In at least one embodiment, removing signals detected by the second antenna 110 from the signals detected by the first antenna 100 can functionally remove ambient noise from the signal detected by the first antenna 100. In other words, subtracting the signal 350 from signal 340 can result in a signal that comprises components that were predominantly generated on the same side of the RF shield 120 as the first antenna 100.


The resulting signal 360 can be transmitted to a processing unit 130 and/or forwarded to a remote computing system 140 (not shown) that can individually or cooperatively determine that a mobile phone was in use within the operator area of the car 200. The processing unit 130 and/or remote computing system 140 can also determine whether the car 200 or other machine was being operated at the time of the detected mobile phone use.


In at least one embodiment, the processing unit 130 can determine if a mobile phone is in use within the operator area of the car by identifying if the power contained within signal 360 rises above a threshold. One will understand that even after subtracting signal 350 from signal 340, additional radio signals may be present within the operator area of the car 200—even though no wireless device is present within the operator area, such as signals generated by the car itself or other signals reflected within the car that originated from outside of the car. Accordingly, in at least one embodiment, a threshold is used to determine if signal 360 indicates that a device is active within the operator area. The threshold can be a pre-defined threshold or an adjustable threshold that accounts for any of the original signal strength, the type of signal detected, the frequency of the signal, and/or historical detected signal characteristics.


In some embodiments, the shielding between the interior and exterior antennas is only sufficient to partially attenuate a signal emitted from the operator area of a vehicle or other machinery. For instance, the emitted signal can be reflected out of the operator area until it is detected by the exterior antenna(s). Additionally, when the shielding fails to fully prevent transmission of the signal through the shielding, the exterior antenna(s) will be able to detect a partially attenuated signal corresponding to the emitted transmission.


For example, FIG. 4 depicts an embodiment where the signals detected by the interior and exterior antennas 100, 110 are analyzed to identify signal pulses and/or other signal characteristics that are sufficient to correlate signals corresponding to a same transmission and/or device. In some instances, this can include scraping and analyzing transmission meta-data. In other instances, this can include analyzing signal types, transmission frequencies and channels, signal durations, relative signal amplitudes, and/or other similar signal characteristics. In the depicted example, the first antenna 100 detects signal 440 and the second antenna 110 detects signal 450, and the detected signals 440, 450 are then analyzed and correlated within the time domain.


For example, signal component 442 from signal 440 can be correlated with signal component 452 from signal 450. In addition to identifying sufficient correlation between signal component 452 and signal component 442, processing unit 130 can also identify differences in amplitude between the correlated signal components. For example, the processing unit can determine that signal component 452 and signal component 442 appear to have significantly similar waveforms. As such, the processing unit 130 can determine that both signal component 442 and signal component 452 originated from outside of an operators area because neither signal appears to have been significantly attenuated by the RF shield 120.


The processing unit 130 can also correlate signal component 444 and signal component 454. In this case, however, the processing unit 130 can identify a significant difference in amplitude between signal component 444 and signal component 454. Based upon the identified difference in amplitude, the processing unit 130 can determine that signal component 440 originated within the operating area and that the resulting signal component 454 was attenuated by the RF shield 120 before reaching the second antenna 110.


One will understand that the depicted signal components 452, 442, 444, 454 are merely illustrative of a particular embodiment. In practice, the signal components may comprise carrier waves, phase information, frequency information, and other similar signal traits. The signal components 452, 442, 444, 454 in FIG. 4, however, are depicted in a simplified form to more clearly depict the step of signal correlation. In general, multiple different means can be used to correlate signals and signal components to each other. In particular, in at least one embodiment, the method of correlating signals and signal components is configured to clearly identify correlated signals that have been significantly attenuated with respect to each other.


Upon determining that a signal is being generated from within the operator area, the processing unit 130 can transmit a mentoring message to occupants of the operator area that instruct the user to discontinue use of the mobile device, discontinue use of the vehicle/machinery, transmit the data to a remote computing system (not shown), and/or otherwise store the information for later access.


The processing unit 130 can also identify unique characteristics of the identified signal that is being generated within the operator area and store these identified unique characteristics for further processing. These identified unique characteristics can be used, for instance, to later verify that the detected phone belonged to an individual that was present within the operator area and that is associated with a user account that identifies the phone of the user as well as the vehicle. The identified unique characteristics may also be used later to more easily identify when a signal is being generated from within the operator area, which can also be correlated with driving records and phone log records.


In at least one embodiment, the processing unit 130 can comprise a network analyzer, or perform at least some functions of a network analyzer. For example, the processing unit 130 can be used to determine the type of signal being broadcast (i.e., SMS text, phone call, data connection, etc.). Additionally, the processing unit 130 may be able to determine a destination of the signal, as well as the origination device. Also, in at least one embodiment, the processing unit 130 may be able to identify whether the signal is directed towards an emergency service.


Further, in at least one embodiment, the remote computing system (140 from FIG. 1) can comprise a mobile phone account management system, which can provide access to mobile phone plans and accounts. As such, in at least one embodiment, upon detecting a mobile phone being used within the operator area of a car, the processing unit 130 can notify the remote computing system 140, which can then access network records to determine whether a mobile phone associated with the driver of the car is currently active. This may provide the benefit of distinguishing between passengers and operators using mobile phones. For example, a bus driver may be prohibited from using mobile devices, while passengers of the bus may be free to do so. Accordingly, in at least one embodiment, upon detecting the wireless signal originating from within the bus, the remote computing system can access network records and determine if the bus driver's mobile phone is active, and thus distinguish between passengers' mobile devices and the bus driver's mobile devices.


In an alternative embodiment, the remote computing system 140 first identifies that a mobile device that is associated with a particular user account is active. In this case, “active” can include the phone transmitting information, the phone receiving information, an application being executed on the phone, the phone being powered on, the phone being in a low power state, and/or the phone otherwise performing an electronic function. The remote computing system 140 can identify that the mobile device is active by communicating with a cellular carrier that is associated with the user account, by directly accessing an application running on the mobile device, by accessing information received from a cellular tower, or through any number of other methods for identifying a powered on mobile device.


Once the remote computing system 140 determines that a mobile device is active, the remote computing system 140 can access the processing unit 130 within the vehicle or machine to determine if a wireless signal is being generated within the operator area, using the methods and systems described above. In at least one embodiment, this may provide more reliable results because the remote computing system 140 first determines that a mobile device of interest is active, and then determines if a mobile device is being used within the operator area, instead of continually attempting to distinguish between internally originating and externally originating signals.


Accordingly, FIGS. 1-3 and the corresponding text illustrate or otherwise describe various components, apparatus, and systems that can detect a radio signal that is generated within the operator area of a machine. Specifically, embodiments described herein can distinguish between radio signals that originate outside the operator area and signals that originate within the operator area. As such, embodiments described herein can distinguish between a car occupant using a wireless device and a wireless device being used by a passerby who is outside the car.


As described above, the proliferation of wireless devices has significantly increased the likelihood of radio signals being detectable within an operator area of a machine, even though those radio signals were not generated within the operator area. As such, the present systems, apparatus, and methods provide a solution to a growing problem.


In addition to the foregoing, embodiments of the present invention can also be described in terms of methods comprising one or more acts for accomplishing a particular result. Along these lines, FIGS. 5-6B illustrates a method described below with reference to the modules and components of FIGS. 1 through 4.


For example, FIG. 5 illustrates that a method for detecting the use of a radio frequency generating device within an operator area of a human operated machine can include act 500 of receiving a first signal from a first antenna. Act 500 includes receiving, at a processing module, a first signal from a first antenna positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine. For example, FIG. 2B depicts the first antenna 100 receiving a signal from the internal mobile phone 220. As further shown in FIG. 3, the received signal 340 is then communicated to a processing unit 130.



FIG. 5 also shows that the method can include act 510 of receiving a second signal from a second antenna that is separated from the first antenna by a radio frequency attenuator. The second signal can be a same signal as the first signal, only at a reduced signal strength, or a composite signal that is different than the first composite signal, as described above. In at least one implementation, at least components of the first signal and the second signal originate from the same signal source at the same moment in time, even though they may arrive at the respective antennas at different times and with different signal properties resulting from their traversing different paths to the respective antennas. Act 510 includes receiving, at the processing module, the second signal from a second antenna positioned exterior to the at least partially enclosed operator area of the human operated machine, wherein a radio frequency attenuator (e.g., shield) is positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna. In this embodiment, the RF attenuator operates in such a manner as to substantially shield the exterior antenna from signals emitted from within the operator area relative to signals detected by the interior antenna.


Similar to the description above, FIG. 2B depicts the second/exterior antenna 110 receiving a signal from the external mobile phone 210. The second antenna is depicted as being on the outside of the car 200. Additionally, an RF shield 120 separates the first antenna 100 from the second antenna 110. As further shown in FIG. 3, the received signal 350 is then communicated to a processing unit 130.



FIG. 5 shows that the method can also include act 520 of comparing the first signal and the second signal. Act 520 includes comparing features and attributes of the first signal received from the first antenna and the second signal received from the second antenna, even though the signals may be the same signals of different signal strength. In these embodiments, the signal comparison includes correlating signals corresponding to the same transmission or device, in which case the signals are the same signals that are only detected at different signal strengths. As indicated above, this correlation can also include, therefore, identifying pulses, signal frequencies, or other identifying characteristics of the matching transmission signal. Thereafter, the comparison can include determining a signal strength of the corresponding detected signal by the interior and exterior antenna to determine whether the strength of the signal detected by the interior antenna is greater than the signal strength detected for the signal by the exterior antenna, in which case the signal originated from within the operator area.


Comparison of the signals can also include comparing different composite signals. For example, FIG. 3 depicts an embodiment where a signal 350 received from the second antenna 110 is subtracted from a signal 340 received by the first antenna 100 when the signals are different composite signals. The resulting signal 360 is then analyzed by processing unit 130. In this way, the signal are compared to each other by removing the components in the signal 350 received by the second antenna 110 from the signal 340 received by the first antenna 100.


One will understand, however, that other methods of comparing the signals can be used as equivalents to the method described herein. It will also be appreciated that signal strength measurements can be tracked at various times and with various sample rates to determine whether a stronger signal is detected by the first antenna within the operator area as opposed to the signal strength detected by the second antenna located outside of the operator area at the various sample times.


Comparing the first and second signals can also include scraping the metadata, patterns and/or signatures from the first and/or second signals to differentiate and/or distinguish particular signal types or to associate a particular signal with a particular user mobile device or account, as generally suggested above.


In an alternative embodiment, the relative origination of the signals can be determined without directly comparing the signals. For example, the signal strengths of each respective signal can be entered into an equation and then the resulting value can be compared to a baseline value to determine whether the signal originated from within the operator area. In this example, the actual signals are not compared to each other.


With regard to sampling the various signals, it will be appreciated that the processing unit 130 and the remote computing system 140 can also be configured to sample and record the types and strengths of the signals detected the antennas at any desired intervals. In some instances, the sampling is only performed during operation of the vehicle/machine. In other instances, sampling is performed periodically at a fixed interval rate. In yet other instances, the sampling is performed at different variable interval rates responsively to different detected circumstances, such as, but not limited to times of the day, speed of the vehicle, location of the vehicle/machinery, detected number of occupants in the vehicle/machinery, administrator preferences, and so forth.



FIG. 5 shows that the methods of the invention can include an act 530 of determining if a device is active within the operator area. Act 530 can include determining, based upon the comparison of the first signal and the second signal, whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area. For example, FIG. 2B depicts an interior mobile phone 220 that is being used. As depicted the active interior mobile phone 220 is generating a signal that is detected by the first antenna 100 but not by the second antenna 110, or at least not at the same strength as the signal is detected by the first antenna 100. Additionally, as shown in FIG. 3, the determination can also be made in some embodiments after subtracting the composite signal 350 received by the second antenna 110 from the composite signal 340 received by the first antenna 100. In at least the foregoing ways, the described system of interior and exterior antennas separated by a RF shield positioned on or near an operator area can distinguish between a radio signal generated within the operator area and a radio signal generated outside of the operator area.


The various acts shown in FIG. 5 can be performed iteratively at various intervals, as described above. Furthermore, the methods of the invention can include performing all of the acts at a single system or by a plurality of systems. Accordingly, one or more advantages can be achieved using systems, apparatus, and methods described herein. It will also be appreciated, with regard to the foregoing that the accuracy of various measurements and/or collection of the various RF data can be sensitive to and/or vary with different environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, reflective surfacing, etc. Accordingly, the aforementioned measuring of RF power, as performed by the antennas and other system components, is temperature sensitive and will, therefore, compensate for the different environmental conditions by including temperature compensatory circuitry/software and other environmental compensatory circuitry/software at the antennas and/or other processing units (130, 140) to compensate for any variability caused by a detected environmental condition.


As an example of at least one embodiment for comparing the first and second signals, FIG. 6A illustrates that a method for comparing a first signal and a second signal can include act 600 of filtering first and second signals. Act 600 can include passing the first signal and the second signal through one or more filters. In particular, the filters can comprise band pass filters that are configured to filter out any signals and frequencies that are not of interest. For example, it may be desirable to filter out Bluetooth signals, radio signals, TV signals, and other signals that are not related to mobile phones. In various embodiments, the filters can be static or dynamic, digital or analog, or any combination of thereof.



FIG. 6A also shows that the method can include act 610 of subtracting the second signal from the first signal. Act 610 can include inverting the second signal and adding it to the first signal or directly subtracting the second signal from the first signal. The step of subtracting the second signal from the first signal can be performed by a digital processing unit, one or more discrete analog components, one or more integrated components, or through other similar components.



FIG. 6A also shows that the method can include act 620 of identifying within a resulting signal any remaining signal information. Act 620 can include identifying any residual first signal components that remain after subtracting the second signal from the first signal. In at least one embodiment, Act 620 includes only identifying remaining signal information that exceeds a specific threshold. The threshold can be determined in a number of different ways. For instance, the threshold can be a previously determined static threshold, a dynamic threshold that automatically adjusts to be a certain level higher than the noise floor, a dynamic threshold that is automatically calculated based upon the power of the first signal and/or the second signal, or a dynamic threshold that is otherwise calculated.


As an additional example of at least one embodiment for comparing the first and second signals, FIG. 6B illustrates that a method for comparing a first signal and a second signal can include act 630 of filtering the first and second signals. Similar to Act 600 above, Act 630 can include passing the first signal and the second signal through one or more filters. The filters can comprise band pass filters that are configured to filter out any signals and frequencies that are not of interest. In various embodiments, the filters can be static or dynamic, digital or analog, or any combination of thereof.



FIG. 6B also shows that the method can include act 640 of correlating signal components within the second signal and the first signal. Specifically, act 640 can include identification of various sub-components of the second signal that correlate with similar sub-components within the first signal. In at least one embodiment, the first signal and the second signal both respectively contain any signals that are being detected by the first antenna and the second antenna. As such, the first signal may contain multiple individual signals that are being broadcast from a variety of different devices. The second signal can also similarly comprise a variety of different signals being received from different signals. In at least one embodiment, “sub-components” can include the individual signals that are contained with either the first signal or second signal, respectively.


Accordingly, act 640 can comprise identifying, within the first signal, sub-components, or individual signals, that are associated with single devices and correlating those identified individual signals with sub-components, or individual signals, within the second signal that are associated with the same respective device. Sub-components from the first signal can be matched with sub-components from the second signal by comparing scraped data, such as metadata, by comparing frequency and channel information, by matching patterns of the sub-components within the first signal with patterns of sub-components with the second signal, or by any other known method of signal matching.



FIG. 6B also shows that the method can include act 650 of identifying differences in characteristics between the correlated signal components. Act 650 can include identifying a specific sub-component from the first signal comprises significantly more power than the correlated sub-component from the second signal. Put another way, act 650 can include identifying that the sub-component from the second signal appears to be attenuated by at least a threshold amount. In at least one embodiment, the attenuation level of the RF shield determines the threshold level.


Accordingly, FIGS. 6A and 6B both provide methods for comparing the first signal with the second signal. One will understand that different methods for comparing the first signal to the second signal may exist that if used would fall within the bounds of the present invention.


The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. For instance, while the foregoing embodiments have been described with specific reference to differentiating whether a mobile device is on and/or is transmitting signals from within an operator area of a vehicle/machinery, based on the use of two antennas and an RF shield interposed between the two antennas, it will be appreciated that the inventive concepts of the present invention can also extend to the use of the antennas and RF shield to differentiate whether a mobile device is active or being utilized within any predetermined location or facility by positioning the RF shield on a wall of the facility and by positioning the antennas on opposing sides of the RF shield.


The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus used for determining whether a mobile device is transmitting from within a human operated machine, the apparatus comprising: a first antenna positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine;a second antenna positioned external to the operator area of the human operated machine;a radio frequency shield positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna; anda processing module that is in electrical communication with the first antenna and the second antenna, wherein the processing module is configured to: receive a first signal received from the first antenna and a second signal received from the second antenna, anddetermine, based upon an analysis of the first signal and the second signal, whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
  • 2. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the human operated machine is an automobile and the operator area is a cab of the vehicle.
  • 3. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the human operated machine is a piece of industrial equipment.
  • 4. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the radio frequency shield comprises a component of the human operated machine.
  • 5. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the first and second signals are the same transmission signal at different signal strengths.
  • 6. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the processing module comprises a remote server.
  • 7. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the second antenna is positioned on a roof of the human operated machinery.
  • 8. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the first signal and the second signal both originate from a signal source at a same moment in time.
  • 9. A system installed in a human operated machine configured to detect transmission of a radio frequency generating device within the human operated machine, the system comprising: a first antenna positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine;a second antenna positioned external to the at least partially enclosed operator area of the human operated machine;a radio frequency shield positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna; anda processing module that receives information generated by the first antenna and the second antenna, wherein the processing module is configured to: receive a first signal received from the first antenna and a second signal received from the second antenna, anddetermine, based upon an analysis of the first signal and the second signal, whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
  • 10. The system as recited in claim 9, wherein the processing module comprises a remote server.
  • 11. The system as recited in claim 9, wherein the first signal and the second signal are correlated as being a same signal transmitted from a single radio frequency generating device and wherein the first signal has a greater signal strength, as detected by the first antenna, than a signal strength detected by the second signal, as detected by the second antenna, and wherein it is determined based on relative signal strength of the first and second signals that the single radio frequency generating device is transmitting from within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
  • 12. The system as recited in claim 9, wherein if it is determined that a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area, the processing module is further configured to access a mobile phone account management system and determine whether a radio frequency generating device that is associated with a specific account holder is active.
  • 13. The system as recited in claim 9, wherein the processing module is further configured to: subtract at least a portion of the second signal from at least a portion of the first signal; andidentify at least a portion of the first signal that is a threshold amount greater than a corresponding portion of the second signal.
  • 14. The system as recited in claim 9, wherein the processing module comprises one or more band pass filters configured to filter the first signal and the second signal.
  • 15. The system as recited in claim 9, wherein the processing module comprises a network analyzer.
  • 16. A method for detecting the transmission of a radio frequency generating device that is located within an operator area of a human operated machine, the method comprising: receiving, at a processing module, a first signal from a first antenna positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine;receiving, at the processing module, a second signal from a second antenna positioned exterior to the at least partially enclosed operator area of the human operated machine, wherein a radio frequency attenuator is positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna relative to a signal originating from within the operator area;receiving the first signal received from the first antenna and the second signal received from the second antenna; anddetermining, based upon an analysis of the first signal and the second signal, whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
  • 17. A method as recited in claim 16, wherein analyzing the first signal and the second signal comprises: filtering the first signal and the second signal with one or more band pass filters; andcomparing one or more signal pulses within the filtered first signal to one or more signal pulses within the filtered second signal.
  • 18. A method as recited in claim 16, wherein analyzing the first signal and the second signal comprises subtracting at least a portion of the second signal from at least a portion of the first signal.
  • 19. A method as recited in claim 18, wherein determining whether a radio frequency generating device is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area comprises identifying at least a portion of the first signal that is a threshold amount greater than a corresponding portion of the second signal.
  • 20. A method as recited in claim 16, wherein the method further includes correlating the first signal and the second signal as corresponding to a single signal transmission or a single radio frequency generating device and wherein the first signal has a greater signal strength, as detected by the first antenna, than a signal strength of the second signal as detected by the second antenna, and wherein it is determined based on relative signal strength of the first and second signals that the single radio frequency generating device is transmitting from within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
  • 21. A method as recited in claim 16, further comprising: extracting frequency information from the first signal and the second signal; andidentifying, based upon the extracted frequency information, data relating to one or more communications that are being received by the first antenna and the second antenna.
  • 22. A computer storage device having stored computer-executable instructions which, when executed by at least one hardware processor, implement a method for detecting the use of a radio frequency generating device by within an operator area of a human operated machine, wherein the method includes: receiving, at a processing module, a first signal from a first antenna positioned within an at least partially enclosed operator area of a human operated machine;receiving, at the processing module, a second signal from a second antenna positioned exterior to the at least partially enclosed operator area of the human operated machine, wherein a radio frequency attenuator is positioned between the first antenna and the second antenna relative to a signal originating from within the operator area;comparing the first signal received from the first antenna and the second signal received from the second antenna to correlate the first and second signals as being a same signal at different strengths; anddetermining, based upon the comparison of the first signal and the second signal and relative strengths of the first and second signal, whether a radio frequency generating device corresponding to the first and second signals is active within the at least partially enclosed operator area.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/897,648 filed on Oct. 30, 2013 and entitled “WIRELESS DEVICE DETECTION USING MULTIPLE ANTENNAS SEPARATED BY AN RF SHIELD,” which application is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (596)
Number Name Date Kind
1767325 Taylor Jun 1930 A
3975708 Lusk Aug 1976 A
4344136 Panik Aug 1982 A
4369427 Drebinger et al. Jan 1983 A
4395624 Wartski Jul 1983 A
4419654 Funk Dec 1983 A
4458535 Juergens Jul 1984 A
4785280 Fubini Nov 1988 A
4843578 Wade Jun 1989 A
4926417 Futami May 1990 A
4939652 Steiner Jul 1990 A
5006829 Miyamoto et al. Apr 1991 A
5032821 Domanico Jul 1991 A
5074144 Krofchalk et al. Dec 1991 A
5119504 Durboraw, III Jun 1992 A
5223844 Mansell et al. Jun 1993 A
5225842 Brown et al. Jul 1993 A
5266922 Smith et al. Nov 1993 A
5303163 Ebaugh et al. Apr 1994 A
5305214 Komatsu Apr 1994 A
5309139 Austin May 1994 A
5311197 Sorden et al. May 1994 A
5325082 Rodriguez Jun 1994 A
5347260 Ginzel Sep 1994 A
5359528 Haendel Oct 1994 A
5365114 Tsurushima Nov 1994 A
5365451 Wang et al. Nov 1994 A
5381155 Gerber Jan 1995 A
5394136 Lammers Feb 1995 A
5400018 Scholl Mar 1995 A
5414432 Penny, Jr. et al. May 1995 A
5422624 Smith Jun 1995 A
5424584 Matsuda Jun 1995 A
5430432 Camhi Jul 1995 A
5436612 Aduddell Jul 1995 A
5436837 Gerstung Jul 1995 A
5446659 Yamawaki Aug 1995 A
5453939 Hoffman Sep 1995 A
5457439 Kuhn Oct 1995 A
5475597 Buck Dec 1995 A
5485161 Vaughn Jan 1996 A
5499182 Ousborne Mar 1996 A
5521579 Bernhard May 1996 A
5521580 Kaneko May 1996 A
5525960 McCall Jun 1996 A
5546305 Kondo Aug 1996 A
5548273 Nicol Aug 1996 A
5581464 Woll Dec 1996 A
5586130 Doyle Dec 1996 A
5600558 Mearek Feb 1997 A
5612875 Haendel Mar 1997 A
5625337 Medawar Apr 1997 A
5642284 Parupalli Jun 1997 A
5648755 Yagihashi Jul 1997 A
5659289 Zonkoski Aug 1997 A
5689067 Klein Nov 1997 A
5708417 Tallman Jan 1998 A
5717374 Smith Feb 1998 A
5719771 Buck Feb 1998 A
5723768 Ammon Mar 1998 A
5740548 Hudgens Apr 1998 A
5742915 Stafford Apr 1998 A
5751245 Janky et al. May 1998 A
5764139 Nojima Jun 1998 A
5767767 Lima Jun 1998 A
5777580 Janky et al. Jul 1998 A
5795997 Gittins Aug 1998 A
5797134 McMillan et al. Aug 1998 A
5801618 Jenkins et al. Sep 1998 A
5801948 Wood Sep 1998 A
5815071 Doyle Sep 1998 A
5819198 Peretz Oct 1998 A
5825283 Camhi Oct 1998 A
5825284 Dunwoody Oct 1998 A
5829782 Breed et al. Nov 1998 A
5844475 Horie Dec 1998 A
5847271 Poublon Dec 1998 A
5862500 Goodwin Jan 1999 A
5867093 Dodd Feb 1999 A
5877678 Donoho Mar 1999 A
5880674 Ufkes Mar 1999 A
5880958 Helms et al. Mar 1999 A
5883594 Lau Mar 1999 A
5892434 Carlson Apr 1999 A
5907277 Tokunaga May 1999 A
5914654 Smith Jun 1999 A
5918180 Dimino Jun 1999 A
5926087 Busch Jul 1999 A
5928291 Jenkins et al. Jul 1999 A
5941915 Federle et al. Aug 1999 A
5945919 Trask Aug 1999 A
5949330 Hoffman Sep 1999 A
5949331 Schofield Sep 1999 A
5954781 Slepian Sep 1999 A
5955942 Slifkin Sep 1999 A
5957986 Coverdill Sep 1999 A
5964816 Kincaid Oct 1999 A
5969600 Tanguay Oct 1999 A
5974356 Doyle et al. Oct 1999 A
5978737 Pawlowski Nov 1999 A
5982278 Cuvelier Nov 1999 A
5987976 Sarangapani Nov 1999 A
5999125 Kurby Dec 1999 A
6002327 Boesch Dec 1999 A
6008724 Thompson Dec 1999 A
6018293 Smith Jan 2000 A
6026292 Coppinger et al. Feb 2000 A
6028508 Mason Feb 2000 A
6028510 Tamam Feb 2000 A
6037861 Ying Mar 2000 A
6037862 Ying Mar 2000 A
6038496 Dobler Mar 2000 A
6044315 Honeck Mar 2000 A
6059066 Lary May 2000 A
6064886 Perez et al. May 2000 A
6064928 Wilson May 2000 A
6064970 McMillan et al. May 2000 A
6067008 Smith May 2000 A
6067009 Hozuka May 2000 A
6072388 Kyrtsos Jun 2000 A
6073007 Doyle Jun 2000 A
6075458 Ladner et al. Jun 2000 A
6078853 Ebner Jun 2000 A
6081188 Kutlucinar Jun 2000 A
6084870 Wooten et al. Jul 2000 A
6094149 Wilson Jul 2000 A
6098048 Dashefsky Aug 2000 A
6100792 Ogino Aug 2000 A
6104282 Fragoso Aug 2000 A
6108591 Segal et al. Aug 2000 A
6112145 Zachman Aug 2000 A
6121922 Mohan Sep 2000 A
6122591 Pomerantz Sep 2000 A
6130608 McKeown Oct 2000 A
6131067 Girerd et al. Oct 2000 A
6133827 Alvey Oct 2000 A
6141610 Rothert Oct 2000 A
6147598 Murphy Nov 2000 A
6172602 Hasfjord Jan 2001 B1
6178374 Mohlenkamp et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184784 Shibuya Feb 2001 B1
6185501 Smith Feb 2001 B1
6188315 Herbert et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195015 Jacobs et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198995 Settles Mar 2001 B1
6204756 Senyk Mar 2001 B1
6204757 Evans Mar 2001 B1
6208240 Ledesma Mar 2001 B1
6212455 Weaver Apr 2001 B1
6216066 Goebel Apr 2001 B1
6222458 Harris Apr 2001 B1
6225898 Kamiya May 2001 B1
6227862 Harkness May 2001 B1
6229438 Kutlucinar May 2001 B1
6232873 Dilz May 2001 B1
6246933 Bague Jun 2001 B1
6246948 Thakker Jun 2001 B1
6247360 Anderson Jun 2001 B1
6249219 Perez Jun 2001 B1
6253129 Jenkins et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255892 Gartner Jul 2001 B1
6255939 Roth Jul 2001 B1
6256558 Sugiura et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262657 Okuda et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262658 O'Connor Jul 2001 B1
6265989 Taylor Jul 2001 B1
6278361 Magiawala Aug 2001 B1
6285931 Hattori Sep 2001 B1
6289332 Menig Sep 2001 B2
6294988 Shomura Sep 2001 B1
6294989 Schofield Sep 2001 B1
6295492 Lang Sep 2001 B1
6297768 Allen, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6301533 Markow Oct 2001 B1
6306063 Horgan et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308120 Good Oct 2001 B1
6308134 Croyle et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313742 Larson Nov 2001 B1
6320497 Fukumoto Nov 2001 B1
6331825 Ladner et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333686 Waltzer Dec 2001 B1
6337653 Bchler Jan 2002 B1
6339739 Folke Jan 2002 B1
6339745 Novik Jan 2002 B1
6344805 Yasui Feb 2002 B1
6351211 Bussard Feb 2002 B1
6353778 Brown Mar 2002 B1
6356188 Meyers Mar 2002 B1
6356822 Diaz Mar 2002 B1
6356833 Jeon Mar 2002 B2
6356836 Adolph Mar 2002 B1
6359554 Skibinski Mar 2002 B1
6362730 Razavi Mar 2002 B2
6362734 McQuade Mar 2002 B1
6366199 Osborn Apr 2002 B1
6378959 Lesesky Apr 2002 B2
6389340 Rayner May 2002 B1
6393348 Ziegler May 2002 B1
6401029 Kubota et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404629 Hsu Jun 2002 B1
6405112 Rayner Jun 2002 B1
6405128 Bechtolsheim et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415226 Kozak Jul 2002 B1
6417764 Tonkin Jul 2002 B2
6424268 Isonaga Jul 2002 B1
6427687 Kirk Aug 2002 B1
6430488 Goldman Aug 2002 B1
6433681 Foo Aug 2002 B1
6438472 Tano et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441732 Laitsaari Aug 2002 B1
6449540 Rayner Sep 2002 B1
6452910 Vij et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459365 Tamura Oct 2002 B2
6459367 Green Oct 2002 B1
6459369 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459961 Obradovich Oct 2002 B1
6459969 Bates Oct 2002 B1
6462675 Humphrey Oct 2002 B1
6472979 Schofield Oct 2002 B2
6476763 Allen, Jr. Nov 2002 B2
6480106 Crombez Nov 2002 B1
6484035 Allen, Jr. Nov 2002 B2
6484091 Shibata Nov 2002 B2
6493650 Rodgers Dec 2002 B1
6512969 Wang et al. Jan 2003 B1
6515596 Awada Feb 2003 B2
6519512 Haas Feb 2003 B1
6523912 Bond et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525672 Chainer Feb 2003 B2
6526341 Bird et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529159 Fan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535166 Zhou Mar 2003 B1
6542074 Tharman Apr 2003 B1
6542794 Obradovich Apr 2003 B2
6552682 Fan et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556905 Mittelsteadt Apr 2003 B1
6559769 Anthony May 2003 B2
6564126 Lin May 2003 B1
6567000 Slifkin May 2003 B2
6571168 Murphy May 2003 B1
6577946 Myr Jun 2003 B2
6587759 Obradovich Jul 2003 B2
6594579 Lowrey Jul 2003 B1
6599243 Woltermann Jul 2003 B2
6600985 Weaver Jul 2003 B2
6604033 Banet Aug 2003 B1
6609063 Bender et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609064 Dean Aug 2003 B1
6611740 Lowrey Aug 2003 B2
6611755 Coffee Aug 2003 B1
6622085 Amita et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629029 Giles Sep 2003 B1
6630884 Shanmugham Oct 2003 B1
6631322 Arthur et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636790 Lightner Oct 2003 B1
6638512 Lee Oct 2003 B1
6643578 Levine Nov 2003 B2
6651001 Apsell Nov 2003 B2
6654682 Kane et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657540 Knapp Dec 2003 B2
6662013 Takiguchi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6662141 Kaub Dec 2003 B2
6664922 Fan Dec 2003 B1
6665613 Duvall Dec 2003 B2
6674362 Yoshioka Jan 2004 B2
6675085 Straub Jan 2004 B2
6677854 Dix Jan 2004 B2
6678612 Khawam Jan 2004 B1
6696932 Skibinski Feb 2004 B2
6701234 Vogelsang Mar 2004 B1
6703925 Steffel Mar 2004 B2
6714894 Tobey et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718235 Borugian Apr 2004 B1
6718239 Rayner Apr 2004 B2
6720889 Yamaki et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727809 Smith Apr 2004 B1
6728542 Meda Apr 2004 B2
6728605 Lash Apr 2004 B2
6732031 Lighter May 2004 B1
6732032 Banet May 2004 B1
6737962 Mayor May 2004 B2
6741169 Magiawala May 2004 B2
6741170 Alrabady May 2004 B2
6745153 White Jun 2004 B2
6748322 Fernandez Jun 2004 B1
6750761 Newman Jun 2004 B1
6750762 Porter Jun 2004 B1
6756916 Yanai Jun 2004 B2
6759952 Dunbridge Jul 2004 B2
6766244 Obata et al. Jul 2004 B2
6768448 Farmer Jul 2004 B2
6775602 Gordon Aug 2004 B2
6778068 Wolfe Aug 2004 B2
6778885 Agashe et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784793 Gagnon Aug 2004 B2
6784832 Knockeart et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788196 Ueda Sep 2004 B2
6788207 Wilkerson Sep 2004 B2
6792339 Basson Sep 2004 B2
6795017 Puranik et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798354 Schuessler Sep 2004 B2
6803854 Adams et al. Oct 2004 B1
6807481 Gastelum Oct 2004 B1
6810321 Cook Oct 2004 B1
6813549 Good Nov 2004 B2
6819236 Kawai Nov 2004 B2
6822557 Weber Nov 2004 B1
6832141 Skeen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6845314 Fosseen Jan 2005 B2
6845316 Yates Jan 2005 B2
6845317 Craine Jan 2005 B2
6847871 Malik et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847872 Bodin Jan 2005 B2
6847873 Li Jan 2005 B1
6847887 Casino Jan 2005 B1
6850841 Casino Feb 2005 B1
6853910 Oesterling Feb 2005 B1
6859039 Horie Feb 2005 B2
6859695 Klausner Feb 2005 B2
6865457 Mittelsteadt Mar 2005 B1
6867733 Sandhu et al. Mar 2005 B2
6868386 Henderson et al. Mar 2005 B1
6870469 Ueda Mar 2005 B2
6873253 Veziris Mar 2005 B2
6873261 Anthony Mar 2005 B2
6879894 Lightner Apr 2005 B1
6885293 Okumura Apr 2005 B2
6892131 Coffee May 2005 B2
6894606 Forbes et al. May 2005 B2
6895332 King May 2005 B2
6909398 Knockeart et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909947 Douros et al. Jun 2005 B2
6914523 Munch Jul 2005 B2
6922133 Wolfe Jul 2005 B2
6922571 Kinoshita Jul 2005 B1
6922616 Obradovich Jul 2005 B2
6922622 Dulin Jul 2005 B2
6925425 Remboski Aug 2005 B2
6928348 Lightner Aug 2005 B1
6937162 Tokitsu Aug 2005 B2
6950013 Scaman Sep 2005 B2
6954140 Holler Oct 2005 B2
6958976 Kikkawa Oct 2005 B2
6960168 Yanagidaira et al. Nov 2005 B2
6965827 Wolfson Nov 2005 B1
6968311 Knockeart et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970075 Cherouny Nov 2005 B2
6970783 Knockeart et al. Nov 2005 B2
6972669 Saito Dec 2005 B2
6980131 Taylor Dec 2005 B1
6981565 Gleacher Jan 2006 B2
6982636 Bennie Jan 2006 B1
6983200 Bodin Jan 2006 B2
6988033 Lowrey Jan 2006 B1
6988034 Marlatt et al. Jan 2006 B1
6989739 Li Jan 2006 B2
7002454 Gustafson Feb 2006 B1
7002579 Olson Feb 2006 B2
7005975 Lehner Feb 2006 B2
7006820 Parker et al. Feb 2006 B1
7012632 Freeman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019641 Lakshmanan Mar 2006 B1
7020548 Saito et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023321 Brillon et al. Apr 2006 B2
7023332 Saito Apr 2006 B2
7024318 Fischer Apr 2006 B2
7027808 Wesby Apr 2006 B2
7034705 Yoshioka Apr 2006 B2
7038578 Will May 2006 B2
7042347 Cherouny May 2006 B2
7047114 Rogers May 2006 B1
7049941 Rivera-Cintron May 2006 B2
7054742 Khavakh et al. May 2006 B2
7059689 Lesesky Jun 2006 B2
7065349 Nath et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069126 Bernard Jun 2006 B2
7069134 Williams Jun 2006 B2
7072753 Eberle Jul 2006 B2
7081811 Johnston Jul 2006 B2
7084755 Nord Aug 2006 B1
7088225 Yoshioka Aug 2006 B2
7089166 Smith Aug 2006 B2
7091880 Sorensen Aug 2006 B2
7098812 Hirota Aug 2006 B2
7099750 Miyazawa Aug 2006 B2
7099774 King Aug 2006 B2
7102496 Ernst Sep 2006 B1
7109850 Kawazoe et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109853 Mattson Sep 2006 B1
7113081 Reichow Sep 2006 B1
7113107 Taylor Sep 2006 B2
7117075 Larschan et al. Oct 2006 B1
7119696 Borugian Oct 2006 B2
7124027 Ernst Oct 2006 B1
7124088 Bauer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129825 Weber Oct 2006 B2
7132934 Allison Nov 2006 B2
7132937 Lu Nov 2006 B2
7132938 Suzuki Nov 2006 B2
7133755 Salman Nov 2006 B2
7135983 Filippov Nov 2006 B2
7138916 Schwartz Nov 2006 B2
7139661 Holze Nov 2006 B2
7145442 Wai Dec 2006 B1
7149206 Pruzan Dec 2006 B2
7155259 Bauchot et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155321 Bromley et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161473 Hoshal Jan 2007 B2
7164986 Humphries Jan 2007 B2
7170390 Quinones Jan 2007 B2
7170400 Cowelchuk Jan 2007 B2
7174243 Lightner Feb 2007 B1
7180407 Guo Feb 2007 B1
7180409 Brey Feb 2007 B2
7187271 Nagata Mar 2007 B2
7188025 Hudson, Jr. Mar 2007 B2
7196629 Ruoss Mar 2007 B2
7197500 Israni et al. Mar 2007 B1
7216022 Kynast et al. May 2007 B2
7216035 Hortner May 2007 B2
7218211 Ho May 2007 B2
7222009 Hijikata May 2007 B2
7225065 Hunt May 2007 B1
7228211 Lowrey Jun 2007 B1
7233235 Pavlish Jun 2007 B2
7236862 Kanno Jun 2007 B2
7239948 Nimmo Jul 2007 B2
7256686 Koutsky Aug 2007 B2
7256700 Ruocco Aug 2007 B1
7256702 Isaacs Aug 2007 B2
7260497 Watabe Aug 2007 B2
RE39845 Hasfjord Sep 2007 E
7269507 Cayford Sep 2007 B2
7269530 Lin Sep 2007 B1
7271716 Nou Sep 2007 B2
7273172 Olsen Sep 2007 B2
7280046 Berg Oct 2007 B2
7283904 Benjamin Oct 2007 B2
7286917 Hawkins Oct 2007 B2
7286929 Staton Oct 2007 B2
7289024 Sumcad Oct 2007 B2
7289035 Nathan Oct 2007 B2
7292152 Torkkola Nov 2007 B2
7292159 Culpepper Nov 2007 B2
7298248 Finley Nov 2007 B2
7298249 Avery Nov 2007 B2
7301445 Moughler Nov 2007 B2
7308247 Thompson et al. Dec 2007 B2
7317383 Ihara Jan 2008 B2
7317392 DuRocher Jan 2008 B2
7317927 Staton Jan 2008 B2
7319848 Obradovich Jan 2008 B2
7321294 Mizumaki Jan 2008 B2
7321825 Ranalli Jan 2008 B2
7323972 Nobusawa Jan 2008 B2
7323974 Schmid Jan 2008 B2
7323982 Staton Jan 2008 B2
7327239 Gallant Feb 2008 B2
7327258 Fast Feb 2008 B2
7333883 Geborek Feb 2008 B2
7339460 Lane Mar 2008 B2
7349782 Churchill Mar 2008 B2
7352081 Taurasi Apr 2008 B2
7355508 Mian Apr 2008 B2
7365639 Yuhara Apr 2008 B2
7366551 Hartley Apr 2008 B1
7375624 Hines May 2008 B2
7376499 Salman May 2008 B2
7378946 Lahr May 2008 B2
7378949 Chen May 2008 B2
7386394 Shulman Jun 2008 B2
7397363 Joao Jul 2008 B2
7421334 Dahlgren et al. Sep 2008 B2
7433889 Barton Oct 2008 B1
7447509 Cossins et al. Nov 2008 B2
7474264 Bolduc et al. Jan 2009 B2
7474269 Mayer et al. Jan 2009 B2
7499949 Barton Mar 2009 B2
7565230 Gardner et al. Jul 2009 B2
7671752 Sofer Mar 2010 B2
7697917 Camp et al. Apr 2010 B2
7706940 Itatsu Apr 2010 B2
7715853 Frerking et al. May 2010 B1
7747410 Van Esch Jun 2010 B2
7876205 Catten Jan 2011 B2
7880642 Gueziec Feb 2011 B2
7898388 Ehrman et al. Mar 2011 B2
7941258 Mittelsteadt et al. May 2011 B1
8044809 Farmer Oct 2011 B2
8090598 Bauer et al. Jan 2012 B2
8150628 Hyde et al. Apr 2012 B2
8311277 Peleg et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314708 Gunderson et al. Nov 2012 B2
8428307 Bradai et al. Apr 2013 B2
8630768 McClellan et al. Jan 2014 B2
20010018628 Jenkins et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020005895 Freeman et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019703 Levine Feb 2002 A1
20020024444 Hiyama et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020103622 Burge Aug 2002 A1
20020111725 Burge Aug 2002 A1
20020116228 Bauer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128000 do Nascimento Sep 2002 A1
20020173881 Lash et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030013460 Papadias et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030016636 Tari et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030045273 Pyhalammi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030048228 Chen Mar 2003 A1
20030052797 Rock et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055555 Knockeart et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060950 McKeown et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069000 Kindo et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030134660 Himmel et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030169185 Taylor Sep 2003 A1
20040039504 Coffee et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040054687 McDonough Mar 2004 A1
20040066330 Knockeart et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040077339 Martens Apr 2004 A1
20040083041 Skeen et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040138794 Saito et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142672 Stankewitz Jul 2004 A1
20040143602 Ruiz et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153362 Bauer et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040176083 Shiao et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040210353 Rice Oct 2004 A1
20040225557 Phelan et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236474 Chowdhary et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236475 Chowdhary Nov 2004 A1
20040252027 Torkkola et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257245 Jo Dec 2004 A1
20050021270 Hong et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050064835 Gusler Mar 2005 A1
20050070245 Nath et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050091018 Craft Apr 2005 A1
20050096809 Skeen et al. May 2005 A1
20050119002 Bauchot et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050119030 Bauchot et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131597 Raz et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137757 Phelan et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050171663 Mittelsteadt et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184860 Taruki et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050255874 Stewart-Baxter et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060055565 Kawamata et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060080359 Powell et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060121951 Perdomo et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060154687 McDowell Jul 2006 A1
20060190822 Basson Aug 2006 A1
20060193749 Ghazarian et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060212195 Veith et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060212495 Veith et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060220905 Hovestadt Oct 2006 A1
20060234711 McArdle Oct 2006 A1
20060265125 Glaza Nov 2006 A1
20060281495 Yang Dec 2006 A1
20060284769 Bolduc et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005240 Oumi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005404 Raz et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027726 Warren et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070040928 Jung et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050130 Grimm et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070057781 Breed Mar 2007 A1
20070124332 Ballesty et al. May 2007 A1
20070126601 Park Jun 2007 A1
20070136078 Plante Jun 2007 A1
20070186923 Poutiatine et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070202929 Satake Aug 2007 A1
20070229234 Smith Oct 2007 A1
20070236342 Hines et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070260363 Miller Nov 2007 A1
20070293206 Lund Dec 2007 A1
20080030316 Flick Feb 2008 A1
20080064413 Breed Mar 2008 A1
20080064446 Camp et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080086508 Ballew Apr 2008 A1
20080120175 Doering May 2008 A1
20080122603 Plante May 2008 A1
20080221787 Vavrus Sep 2008 A1
20080252487 McClellan et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255722 McClellan et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255888 Berkobin Oct 2008 A1
20080262670 McClellan et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080296968 Culbert Dec 2008 A1
20080319602 McClellan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319604 Follmer et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090085728 Catten Apr 2009 A1
20100032632 Catten Feb 2010 A1
20100033577 Doak et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100036610 Urciuoli et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100130182 Rosen May 2010 A1
20100134182 Kapoor et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100265074 Namba et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110115618 Catten May 2011 A1
20110179080 Miyazaki et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120181765 Hill et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120229254 Nowottnick Sep 2012 A1
20130076577 Chakam et al. Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
2071931 Dec 1993 CA
2307259 Oct 2001 CA
2631103 Nov 2008 CA
19700353 Jul 1998 DE
0843177 May 1998 EP
1811481 Jul 2007 EP
2434346 Jul 2007 GB
2454224 May 2009 GB
2005-250825 Sep 2005 JP
2007235530 Sep 2007 JP
WO 2004019646 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2005003885 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005109273 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005109369 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2008045320 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008109477 Sep 2008 WO
WO 2013033756 Mar 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (54)
Entry
Ogle, et al. “Accuracy of Global Positioning System for Determining Driver Performance Parameters”, Transportation Research Record 1818; Paper No. 02-1063; pp. 12-24. Available at least as early as Feb 2003.
Shen et al., “A Computer Assistant for Vehicle Dispatching with Learning Capabilities”, Annals of Operations Research 61, 1995, pp. 189-211. (The month of Publication is Irrelevant since the year of Publication is clearly prior to the filing of the Application).
Tijerina et al., “Final Report Supplement; Heavy Vehicle Workload Assessment; Task 5; Workload Assessment Protocol”, U.S. Department of Transportation, Oct. 1996, 69 pages.
Myra Blanco, “Effects of In-Vehicle Information System (IVIS) Tasks on the Information Processing Demands of a Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO) Driver”, Dec. 1999, 230 pages.
Zhu et al., “A Small Low-Cost Hybrid Orientation system and Its Error Analysis”, Sensors Journal, IEEE—vol. 9, Issue 3, Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/JSEN.2008.2012196; Publication Year: Mar. 2009, pp. 223-230.
Almazan et al., “Full auto-calibration of a smartphone on board a vehicle using IMU and GPS embedded sensors”, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2013 IEEE; Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/IVS.2013.6629658; Publication Year: Jun. 2013, pp. 1374-1380.
Lupton et al., “Efficient Integration of Inertial Observations Into Visual Slam Without Initialization”, Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009, IROS 2009, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on: Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354267, Publication Year: Oct. 2009, pp. 1547-1552.
Mungula et al., “Attitude and Heading System Based on EKF Total State Configuration”, Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on; Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/ISIE.2011.5984493; Publication Year: Jun. 2011, pp. 2147-2152.
Huddle et al., “Application of Inertial Navigation Systems to Geodetic Position and Gravity Vector Survey”, Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, 1978 IEEE Conference on; vol. 17, Part 1; Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/CDC.1978.267967; Publication Year: 1978, pp. 459-465.(The month of Publication is irrelevant since the year of Publication is clearly prior to the filing of the Application).
Zhao Yan et al., “Attitude Measurement of Driver's Head Based on Accelerometer and Magnetoresistive Sensor”, Fluid Power and Mechatronics (FPM), 2011 International Conference on; Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/FPM.2011.6045836; Publication Year: Aug. 2011, pp. 613-617.
Google Maps, “Google Maps”, Available at least as early as Dec. 29, 2014. Whole Document.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,325, mail date Jun. 8, 2009, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,556, Sep. 1, 2009, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/866,247, Sep. 29, 2009, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,556, May 4, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/866,247, Jun 25, 2010, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,325, Aug. 3, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/866,247, Nov. 29, 2010, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,056, Jan. 18, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/222,260, Jan. 19, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Feb. 16, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,056, Sep. 16, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/222,260, Oct. 14, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Nov. 14, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,056, Feb. 16, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/222,260, Mar. 29, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Apr. 11, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,056, Jul. 19, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Aug. 1, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,325, Oct. 12, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/222,260, Nov. 7, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Nov. 26, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Mar. 18, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/767,325, Apr. 24, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/222,260, Jun. 5, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,056, Jun. 21, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Jul. 8, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,237, Oct. 28, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/379,083, Jan. 3, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,178, Feb. 6, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/768,056, Feb. 6, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Feb. 13, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/758,444, Feb. 21, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/379,153, Mar. 17, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/779,178, May 27, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/012,660, Jun. 6, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,556, Jun. 10, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/379,155, Jun. 19, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/758,444, Jun. 27, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,489, Oct. 1, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/379,153, Oct. 6, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/379,153, Jan. 9, 2015, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/379,083, Mar. 17, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/755,556, Mar. 30, 2015, Notice of Allowance.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150118985 A1 Apr 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61897648 Oct 2013 US