1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a petroleum well, and in particular to a petroleum well having a downhole measurement and control system for optimally controlling production of the well or the field in which the well is situated.
2. Description of Related Art
Gas lift is widely employed to generate artificial lift in oil wells that have insufficient reservoir pressure to drive formation fluids to the surface. Gas is supplied to the well by surface compressors which connect through an injection control valve to the annular space between the production tubing and the casing. The gas flows down this annulus to a gas lift valve which connects the annulus between the tubing and the casing to the interior of the tubing. The gas lift valve is located just above the production zone, and the lift is generated by the combination of reduced density caused by gas bubbles in the fluid column filling the tubing, and by entrained flow of the fluids by the rising bubble stream.
A variety of flow regimes in the tubing are recognized, and are determined by the flow rate at the gas lift valve. The gas bubbles in the tubing decompress as they rise in the tubing since the head pressure of the fluid column above drops as the bubbles rise. This to determining the flow regime, such as fluid column height, fluid decompression causes the bubbles to expand, so that the flow regimes within the tubing vary up the tubing, depending on the volumetric ratio of bubbles to liquid. Other factors contribute composition and phases present, tubing diameter, depth of well, temperature, back pressure set by the production control valve, and physical characteristics of the surface collection system.
The rate of injection at the gas lift valve is determined by the pressure difference across the valve, and its orifice size. On the annulus side the pressure is determined by the gas supply flow rate and pressure at the surface connection. On the tubing interior side of the gas lift valve, the pressure is determined by a number of factors, notably the static head of the fluid column above the valve, the flow rate of fluids up the tubing, the formation pressure, and the inflow rate in the production zone. Conventionally the orifice size of the gas lift valve is preset by selection at the time the valve is installed, and cannot be changed thereafter without changing the valve, which requires that the well be taken out of production.
Generally speaking, production from a well increases monotonically and continuously as the injection rate of lift gas increases, but the lift efficiency measured as the ratio of produced liquids to lift gas used varies significantly as the flow regime changes, and becomes low at higher gas injection rates especially if annular flow is induced. The specific numerical relationship between gas injection rate and production rate varies significantly from well to well, and also evolves over time even for a specific well as fluids are withdrawn from the reservoir or inflow conditions from the formation change.
The ongoing supply of compressed lift gas is a major determinant of production cost. Thus the relationship between lift gas injection rate and liquid production rate for a specific well is important, since this determines the real cost of liquids delivered to the surface. Optimizing the lift gas injection rate to minimize production cost is thus of direct value, but generally this optimization can only be approximated since the relationship between injection rate and production rate cannot be monitored in real time, and since there is only an indirect relationship between annulus pressure, determined by lift gas injection rate, and the resulting volumetric gas flow rate at the gas lift valve.
The annulus between the surface and the gas lift valve comprises a large volume which acts as a reservoir of compressed gas. Consequently there is significant delay between changing the flow of lift gas at the surface, and the corresponding change in annulus pressure which determines the injection rate at the gas lift valve downhole. Surface measurements of fluid flow rates and composition also exhibit delays which may be of the order of hours, the transit time for fluids from the production zones to the wellhead. These sources of time latency effectively prevent real-time, closed-loop control of production using gas lift.
Gas lift exhibits an instability termed “heading” if the gas flow rate is lowered below a certain threshold in attempts to either conserve lift gas, or reduce production rate. Heading is caused by a positive-feedback interaction between bottom-hole pressure in the producing zone, and flow rate through the gas lift valve which is determined by the pressure differential between the annulus and the bottom-hole pressure. As the lift gas injection rate is reduced by lowering the annulus pressure, bottom-hole pressure increases as flow from the formation into the well dwindles. This increase in bottom-hole pressure reduces the pressure differential across the gas-lift valve, further reducing the lift gas injection rate and therefore further reducing the withdrawal rate of fluids from the formation. The consequence is cyclic “heading” or surging which eventually leads to cessation of all fluid flow and the death of the well.
An important issue with heading is that the long latency between changes in bottom hole conditions and their consequences as visible production rate fluctuations at the surface makes recovery from heading difficult once it has been initiated. The existing strategy to maintain flow stability is to hold the injection gas flow rate safely above the minimum which is expected to initiate heading, whether or not this leads to the desired production rate from the well.
Under conditions of very low reservoir production, it may become necessary to operate with intermittent gas lift in which gas injection is cyclic. In this mode the gas lift valve is completely closed at the start of the cycle, and reservoir flow into the tubing occurs through a check valve at or near the bottom of the tubing. After sufficient time has elapsed to allow the fluid level in the tubing to have risen above the lift gas valve, this valve is snapped open to allow fast injection of a gas bubble which drives the fluid above it up the tubing. When the slug of fluids has been ejected at the well head, the lift gas valve closes, and the cycle repeats. The check valve prevents produced fluids from being driven back into the formation during the lift phase of the cycle.
Intermittent gas lift is considered undesirable for a number of reasons. The intermittent demand for a high flow of lift gas is hard on compressors, which operate best against a steady demand. To mitigate this factor accumulators may be used to store gas awaiting the next lift cycle, but these are a capital cost item with ongoing maintenance, and at best a partial solution. The high intermittent flow requires oversize piping between the compressor station and the dependent wells, and the cyclic load on the piping is mechanically stressful.
It would, therefore, be a significant advance in the operation of petroleum wells if a real-time method for determining the gas lift injection rate and the production fluid flow rate were provided. It would also be a significant advance if real-time monitoring of “heading” conditions were provided.
All references cited herein are incorporated by reference to the maximum extent allowable by law. To the extent a reference may not be fully incorporated herein, it is incorporated by reference for background purposes and indicative of the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art.
The problems presented in determining real-time downhole conditions in order to optimize production and prevent heading are solved by the systems and methods of the present invention. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a measurement system is provided to measure fluid flow through a main pipe. The measurement system includes a measurement section associated with the main pipe, the measurement section including a first pipe section and a second pipe section. The first pipe section has a smaller diameter than the second pipe section. The measurement system also includes a plurality of pressure sensors for measuring pressure data in the first and second pipe sections. A communication system is provided such that pressure data can be communicated along the main pipe.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a petroleum well having a borehole is provided. The petroleum well includes a tubing string disposed within the borehole, the tubing string being configured to convey a production fluid. A downhole measurement system is provided for determining a flow rate of production fluid within the tubing string, and a communication system is provided for communicating the flow rate data along a piping structure of the well. Under many circumstances, the piping structure will actually be the tubing string, but the piping structure could also comprise a casing located within the borehole of the well.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for optimizing the production of a petroleum well. The petroleum well includes a borehole and tubing string positioned within the borehole for delivering production fluid. The flow rate of the production fluid within the tubing string is determined along with the lift-gas injection rate for lift-gas being injected into the tubing string. After collecting the flow rate and lift-gas injection rate data, it is communicated along a piping structure of the well to a selected location. At the selected location the data is analyzed to determine an optimum operating point for the well.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method for optimizing the production of a petroleum field is provided, the petroleum field having a plurality of petroleum wells. As is typical with petroleum wells, each of the petroleum wells includes a borehole with a tubing string positioned within the borehole for conveying a production fluid (production well), or an injection fluid (injection well). In the case of a production well, the method first comprises the step of determining production fluids flow rate data and lift-gas injection rate data for each of the petroleum wells. In the case of an injection well, the method first comprises the step of determining inflow rate data for each of the wells. This data is then communicated along a piping structure of each well. In some cases, the piping structure may actually be the tubing string, and in other cases the piping structure may be a casing positioned within the borehole. All of the data is collected and analyzed to determine an optimum operating point for the petroleum field.
As used in the present application, a “piping structure” can be one single pipe, a tubing string, a well casing, a pumping rod, a series of interconnected pipes, rods, rails, trusses, lattices, supports, a branch or lateral extension of a well, a network of interconnected pipes, or other structures known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The preferred embodiment makes use of the invention in the context of an oil well where the piping structure comprises tubular, metallic, electrically-conductive pipe or tubing strings, but the invention is not so limited. For the present invention, at least a portion of the piping structure needs to be electrically conductive, such electrically conductive portion may be the entire piping structure (e.g., steel pipes, copper pipes) or a longitudinal extending electrically conductive portion combined with a longitudinally extending non-conductive portion. In other words, an electrically conductive piping structure is one that provides an electrical conducting path from one location where a power source is electrically connected to another location where a device and/or electrical return is electrically connected. The piping structure will typically be conventional round metal tubing, but the cross-sectional geometry of the piping structure, or any portion thereof, can vary in shape (e.g., round, rectangular, square, oval) and size (e.g., length, diameter, wall thickness) along any portion of the piping structure.
A “valve” is any device that functions to regulate the flow of a fluid. Examples of valves include, but are not limited to, bellows-type gas-lift valves and controllable gas-lift valves, each of which may be used to regulate the flow of lift gas into a tubing string of a well. The internal workings of valves can vary greatly, and in the present application, it is not intended to limit the valves described to any particular configuration, so long as the valve functions to regulate flow. Some of the various types of flow regulating mechanisms include, but are not limited to, ball valve configurations, needle valve configurations, gate valve configurations, and cage valve configurations. Valves can be mounted downhole in a well in many different ways, some of which include tubing conveyed mounting configurations, side-pocket mandrel configurations, or permanent mounting configurations such as mounting the valve in an enlarged tubing pod.
The term “modem” is used generically herein to refer to any communications device for transmitting and/or receiving electrical communication signals via an electrical conductor (e.g., metal). Hence, the term is not limited to the acronym for a modulator (device that converts a voice or data signal into a form that can be transmitted)/demodulator (a device that recovers an original signal after it has modulated a high frequency carrier). Also, the term “modem” as used herein is not limited to conventional computer modems that convert digital signals to analog signals and vice versa (e.g., to send digital data signals over the analog Public Switched Telephone Network). For example, if a sensor outputs measurements in an analog format, then such measurements may only need to be modulated (e.g., spread spectrum modulation) and transmitted—hence no analog-to-digital conversion is needed. As another example, a relay/slave modem or communication device may only need to identify, filter, amplify, and/or retransmit a signal received.
The term “processor” is used in the present application to denote any device that is capable of performing arithmetic and/or logic operations. The processor may optionally include a control unit, a memory unit, and an arithmetic and logic unit.
The term “sensor” as used in the present application refers to any device that detects, determines, monitors, records, or otherwise senses the absolute value of or a change in a physical quantity. Sensors as described in the present application can be used to measure temperature, pressure (both absolute and differential), flow rate, seismic data, acoustic data, pH level, salinity levels, valve positions, or almost any other physical data.
The term “electronics module” in the present application refers to a control device. Electronics modules can exist in many configurations and can be mounted downhole in many different ways. In one mounting configuration, the electronics module is actually located within a valve and provides control for the operation of a motor within the valve. Electronics modules can also be mounted external to any particular valve. Some electronics modules will be mounted within side pocket mandrels or enlarged tubing pockets, while others may be permanently attached to the tubing string. Electronics modules often are electrically connected to sensors and assist in relaying sensor information to the surface of the well. It is conceivable that the sensors associated with a particular electronics module may even be packaged within the electronics module. Finally, the electronics module is often closely associated with, and may actually contain, a modem for receiving, sending, and relaying communications from and to the surface of the well. Signals that are received from the surface by the electronics module are often used to effect changes within downhole controllable devices, such as valves. Signals sent or relayed to the surface by the electronics module generally contain information about downhole physical conditions supplied by the sensors.
Referring to
Gas-lift well 10 includes a communication system 34 for providing power and two-way communication downhole in well 10. Casing 24 and tubing string 26 act as electrical conductors for communication system 34. An insulating tubing joint 40 (also referred to as an electrically insulating joint) and a lower induction choke 42 are incorporated into the system to route time-varying current through these conductors. The insulating tubing joint 40 is incorporated close to the wellhead to electrically insulate tubing string 26 from casing 24. Thus, the insulating tubing joint 40 prevents an electrical short circuit between the lower sections of tubing string 26 and casing 24 at tubing hanger 22. Hanger 22 provides mechanical coupling and support of tubing string 26 by transferring the weight load of the tubing string 26 to the casing 24. In alternative to or in addition to the insulating tubing joint 40, another induction choke (not shown) can be placed about the tubing string 26 or an insulating tubing hanger (not shown) could be employed.
Lower induction choke 42 is attached about the tubing string 26 downhole above a packer 48 and serves as a series impedance to electric current flow. The size and material of lower induction choke 42 can be altered to vary the series impedance value; however, the lower induction choke 42 is made of a ferromagnetic material. Choke 42 is mounted concentric and external to tubing string 26, and is typically hardened with epoxy to withstand rough handling.
Centralizers fitted to the tubing string 26 between insulating tubing joint 40 and induction choke 42 are constructed and installed such that they do not create an electrically conductive path between tubing 26 and casing 11. Suitable centralizers may be composed of solid molded or machined plastic, or may be bow spring centralizers provided these are appropriately furnished with electrically insulating components. Many implementations of suitable centralizers will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
A computer and power source 44 having power and communication feeds 46 is disposed outside of borehole 11 at surface 12. Communication feeds 46 pass through a pressure feed 47 located in hanger 22 and are electrically coupled to tubing string 26 below insulating joint 40 of hanger 22. Power and communications signals are supplied to tubing string 26 from computer and power source 44.
A plurality of downhole devices 50 is electrically coupled to tubing string 26 between insulating joint 40 and lower induction choke 42. Some of the downhole devices 50 comprise controllable gas-lift valves. Other downhole devices 50 may comprise electronics modules, sensors, spread spectrum communication devices (i.e. modems), or conventional valves. Although power and communication transmission takes place on the electrically isolated portion of the tubing string, downhole devices 50 may be mechanically coupled above or below lower induction choke 42.
Referring to
A slave modem 130 is electrically coupled to data transformer 128 and is electrically connected to tubing string 26 and casing 24. Slave modem 130 communicates information to master modem 122 such as sensor information received from electronics module 56. Slave modem 130 receives information transmitted by master modem 122 such as instructions for controlling the valve position of downhole controllable valves. Additionally, each slave modem 130 is capable of communicating with other slave modems in order to relay signals or information. Preferably the slave modems 130 are placed so that each can communicate with the next two slave modems up the well and the next two slave modems down the well. This redundancy allows communications to remain operational even in the event of the failure of one of the slave modems 130.
Referring to
Referring to
The production fluid flows at the same mass flow rate through both the first pipe section 144 (small diameter) and the second pipe section 146 (large diameter) of the tubing string 26. However, the differing diameters of the first pipe section 144 and the second pipe section 146 create a large difference in liquid flow velocity in the two pipe sections, and notably the head loss created by the flow is much greater in the first pipe section 144 than that in the second pipe section 146. The difference between pressures measured along the first pipe section 144 provides a measure of flow speed, but also includes a pressure difference due to the static head pressure differential between the sensors. This static head difference depends on the density of the liquid flowing from the formation, which cannot be determined a priori, and must be measured. This measurement is accomplished by the pressure sensors in the larger diameter section of pipe, where the pressure differential is dominated by the static head difference since the liquid flow velocity is low. Knowing the vertical rise between the pressure sensors in the larger diameter pipe section allows calculation of the liquid density.
The lowest pressure transducer effectively measures bottom hole pressure, an important and useful parameter for well characterization. Since the density is a measure of the ratio of oil to water in the produced liquids, this immediate measurement of the oil-water ratio at the moment the fluid is leaving the production zone has value for other diagnostic tests of the well operation such as rapid detection and determination of water intrusion into the well, and its variation with bottom hole pressure.
Alternative methods for measuring mass flow are feasible, such as differential temperature rise sensors, Doppler acoustic, vortex shedding or paddle-wheel flowmeters. The choice in practice depends on the value of the collateral data which becomes available with each sensor.
The volumetric gas flow through the gas lift valve (also referred to as the lift-gas injection rate) is derived from differential pressure measurement between the inlet and outlet of the valve coupled with pre-calibration of the valve to generate its flow curve as a function of opening, the Cv curve of the valve. In practice the Cv curve can be expected to change as the valve wears, but re-calibration at the expected relatively long intervals to account for valve wear is achieved by measuring long-term aggregate gas flow into the annulus at the surface using an orifice plate pressure differential. Alternatively the gas lift valve may be equipped with a mass flowmeter whose readings are transmitted to the surface, although at extra cost.
The well instrumentation as described allows control of production with augmented stability and economy in a variety of conditions. By transmitting production fluid flow rate data and lift-gas injection rate data from the above described instrumentation to the surface of the well, a production curve for the well can be established. This curve can then be used to determine an optimum operating point for the well.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
If intermittent gas lift is needed, either the Bottom Hole Pressure measurement or the production fluid flow rate measurement is used to trigger the opening of the gas lift valve. The closing of the gas lift valve may also be precisely timed since the completion of expulsion of the production fluid at the wellhead allows the appropriate command to be sent to the gas lift valve.
The present invention and its applications are not restricted to a single zone within a well, and may be implemented in a well that produces from multiple zones. Referring to
Referring to
Even though many of the examples discussed herein are applications of the present invention in petroleum wells, the present invention also can be applied to other types of wells, including but not limited to water wells and natural gas wells.
One skilled in the art will see that the present invention can be applied in many areas where there is a need to optimize flow within a borehole, well, or any other area that is difficult to access. Also, one skilled in the art will see that the present invention can be applied in many areas where there is an already existing conductive piping structure and a need to optimize flow by transmitting data along the piping structure. A water sprinkler system or network in a building for extinguishing fires is an example of a piping structure that may be already existing and may have a same or similar path as that desired for routing power and communications to an area where optimized flow is desired. In such case another piping structure or another portion of the same piping structure may be used as the electrical return. The steel structure of a building may also be used as a piping structure and/or electrical return for transmitting power and communications in accordance with the present invention. The steel rebar in a concrete dam or a street may be used as a piping structure and/or electrical return for transmitting power and communications in accordance with the present invention. The transmission lines and network of piping between wells or across large stretches of land may be used as a piping structure and/or electrical return for transmitting power and communications in accordance with the present invention. Surface refinery production pipe networks may be used as a piping structure and/or electrical return for transmitting power and communications in accordance with the present invention. Thus, there are numerous applications of the present invention in many different areas or fields of use.
It should be apparent from the foregoing that an invention having significant advantages has been provided. While the invention is shown in only a few of its forms, it is not just limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
This application claims the benefit of the following U.S. Provisional Applications, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference: COMMONLY OWNED AND PREVIOUSLY FILEDU.S. PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATIONSSer.T&K #No.TitleFiling DateTH 159960/177,999Toroidal Choke Inductor forJan. 24, 2000Wireless Communication andControlTH 160060/178,000Ferromagnetic Choke inJan. 24, 2000WellheadTH 160260/178,001Controllable Gas-Lift WellJan. 24, 2000and ValveTH 160360/177,883Permanent, Downhole,Jan. 24, 2000Wireless, Two-Way Teleme-try Backbone Using Redun-dant Repeater, SpreadSpectrum ArraysTH 166860/177,998Petroleum Well HavingJan. 24, 2000Downhole Sensors,Communication, and PowerTH 166960/177,997System and Method for FluidJan. 24, 2000Flow OptimizationTS 618560/181,322A Method and Apparatus forFeb. 9, 2000the Optimal Predistortion ofan Electromagnetic Signal ina Downhole CommunicationsSystemTH 1599x60/186,376Toroidal Choke Inductor forMar. 2, 2000Wireless Communication andControlTH 1600x60/186,380Ferromagnetic Choke inMar. 2, 2000WellheadTH 160160/186,505Reservoir Production ControlMar. 2, 2000from Intelligent Well DataTH 167160/186,504Tracer Injection in aMar. 2, 2000Production WellTH 167260/186,379Oilwell Casing ElectricalMar. 2, 2000Power Pick-Off PointsTH 167360/186,394Controllable Production WellMar. 2, 2000PackerTH 167460/186,382Use of Downhole HighMar. 2, 2000Pressure Gas in a Gas LiftWellTH 167560/186,503Wireless Smart Well CasingMar. 2, 2000TH 167760/186,527Method for Downhole PowerMar. 2, 2000Management Using Energiz-ation from DistributedBatteries or Capacitors withReconfigurable DischargeTH 167960/186,393Wireless Downhole WellMar. 2, 2000Interval Inflow and InjectionControlTH 168160/186,394Focused Through-CasingMar. 2, 2000Resistivity MeasurementTH 170460/186,531Downhole Rotary HydraulicMar. 2, 2000Pressure for Valve ActuationTH 170560/186,377Wireless Downhole Measure-Mar. 2, 2000ment and Control ForOptimizing Gas Lift Welland Field PerformanceTH 172260/186,381Controlled Downhole Chemi-Mar. 2, 2000cal InjectionTH 172360/186,378Wireless Power and Commun-Mar. 2, 2000ications Cross-Bar Switch The current application shares some specification and figures with the following commonly owned and concurrently filed applications, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference: COMMONLY OWNED AND CONCURRENTLY FILED U.S. PATENTAPPLICATIONSSer.FilingT&K #No.TitleDateTH 160110/220,254Reservoir ProductionAug. 29, 2002Control from IntelligentWell DataTH 167110/220,251Tracer Injection in aAug. 29, 2002Production WellTH 167210/220,402Oil Well Casing ElectricalAug. 29, 2002Power Pick-Off PointsTH 167310/220,252Controllable ProductionAug. 29, 2002Well PackerTH 167410/220,249Use of Downhole HighAug. 29, 2002Pressure Gas in aGas-Lift WellTH 167510/220,195Wireless Smart WellAug. 29, 2002CasingTH 167710/220,253Method for DownholeAug. 29, 2002Power Management UsingEnergization fromDistributed Batteries orCapacitors withReconfigurable DischargeTH 167910/220,453Wireless DownholeAug. 29, 2002Well Interval Inflowand Injection ControlTH 170410/220,326Downhole RotaryAug. 29, 2002Hydraulic Pressure forValve ActuationTH 172210/220,372Controlled DownholeAug. 29, 2002Chemical InjectionTH 172310/220,652Wireless Power andAug. 29, 2002Communications Cross-BarSwitch The current application shares some specification and figures with the following commonly owned and previously filed applications, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference: COMMONLY OWNED AND PREVIOUSLY FILED U.S. PATENTAPPLICATIONSSer.FilingNo.TitleDateTH 1599US09/769,047Choke Inductor forOct. 20, 2003Wireless Communicationand ControlTH 1600US09/769,048Induction Choke for PowerJan. 24, 2001Distribution in PipingStructureTH 1602US09/768,705Controllable Gas-LiftJan. 24, 2001Well and ValveTH 1603US09/768,655Permanent Downhole,Jan. 24, 2001Wireless, Two-WayTelemetry Backbone UsingRedundant RepeaterTH 1668US09/768,046Petroleum Well HavingJan. 24, 2001Downhole Sensors,Communication, and PowerTH 1669US09/768,657System and Method forJan. 24, 2001Fluid Flow OptimizationTS 618509/779,935A Method and ApparatusFeb. 8, 2001for the OptimalPredistortion of an ElectroMagnetic Signal in aDownhole CommunicationsSystem The benefit of 35 U.S.C. § 120 of the above referenced commonly owned applications. The applications referenced in the tables above are referred to herein as the “Related Applications.”
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTUS01/07003 | 3/2/2001 | WO | 00 | 8/29/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0165056 | 9/7/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
525663 | Mottinger | Sep 1894 | A |
2917004 | Davis et al. | Dec 1959 | A |
3083771 | Chapman | Apr 1963 | A |
3247904 | Wakefield, Jr. | Apr 1966 | A |
3427989 | Bostock et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3566963 | Blackledge | Mar 1971 | A |
3602305 | Kisling, III | Aug 1971 | A |
3732728 | Fitzpatrick | May 1973 | A |
3793632 | Still | Feb 1974 | A |
3814545 | Waters | Jun 1974 | A |
3837618 | Juhel | Sep 1974 | A |
3980826 | Widmer | Sep 1976 | A |
4068717 | Needham | Jan 1978 | A |
4087781 | Grossi et al. | May 1978 | A |
4295795 | Gass et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4393485 | Redden | Jul 1983 | A |
4468665 | Thawley et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4545731 | Canalizo et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4576231 | Dowling et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4578675 | MacLeod | Mar 1986 | A |
4596516 | Scott et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4630243 | MacLeod | Dec 1986 | A |
4648471 | Bordon | Mar 1987 | A |
4662437 | Renfro | May 1987 | A |
4681164 | Stacks | Jul 1987 | A |
4709234 | Forehand et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4738313 | McKee | Apr 1988 | A |
4739325 | MacLeod | Apr 1988 | A |
4839644 | Safinya et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4886114 | Perkins et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4901069 | Veneruso | Feb 1990 | A |
4972704 | Wellington et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4981173 | Perkins et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5001675 | Woodward | Mar 1991 | A |
5008664 | More et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5130706 | Van Steenwyk | Jul 1992 | A |
5134285 | Perry et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5160925 | Dailey et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5162740 | Jewell | Nov 1992 | A |
5172717 | Boyle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176164 | Boyle | Jan 1993 | A |
5191326 | Montgomery | Mar 1993 | A |
5230383 | Pringle et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5246860 | Hutchins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251328 | Shaw | Oct 1993 | A |
5257663 | Pringle et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267469 | Espinoza | Dec 1993 | A |
5278758 | Perry et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5331318 | Montgomery | Jul 1994 | A |
5353627 | Diatschenko et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358035 | Grudzinski | Oct 1994 | A |
5367694 | Ueno | Nov 1994 | A |
5394141 | Soulier | Feb 1995 | A |
5396232 | Mathieu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5425425 | Bankston et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5447201 | Mohn | Sep 1995 | A |
5458200 | Lagerlef et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467083 | McDonald et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473321 | Goodman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5493288 | Henneuse | Feb 1996 | A |
5531270 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5561245 | Georgi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574374 | Thompson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576703 | MacLeod et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587707 | Dickie et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592438 | Rorden et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5662165 | Tubel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5723781 | Pruett et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730219 | Tubel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5745047 | Van Gisbergen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782261 | Becker et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797453 | Becker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5881807 | Boe et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883516 | Van Steenwyk et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887657 | Bussear et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896924 | Carmody et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5934371 | Bussear et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937945 | Bussear et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941307 | Tubel | Aug 1999 | A |
5955666 | Mullins | Sep 1999 | A |
5959499 | Khan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960883 | Tubel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963090 | Fukuchi | Oct 1999 | A |
5971072 | Huber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975204 | Tubel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995020 | Owens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012015 | Tubel | Jan 2000 | A |
6012016 | Bilden et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6070608 | Pringle | Jun 2000 | A |
6123148 | Oneal | Sep 2000 | A |
6148915 | Mullen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6192983 | Neuroth et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208586 | Rorden et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6334486 | Carmody et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6484800 | Carmody et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
28296 | May 1981 | EP |
295178 | Dec 1988 | EP |
339825 | Nov 1989 | EP |
492856 | Jul 1992 | EP |
641916 | Mar 1995 | EP |
681090 | Nov 1995 | EP |
697500 | Feb 1996 | EP |
721053 | Jul 1996 | EP |
732053 | Sep 1996 | EP |
919696 | Jun 1999 | EP |
922835 | Jun 1999 | EP |
930518 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 964 134 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0 972 909 | Jan 2000 | EP |
999341 | May 2000 | EP |
2677134 | Dec 1992 | FR |
2083321 | Mar 1982 | GB |
2325949 | Dec 1998 | GB |
2327695 | Feb 1999 | GB |
2338253 | Dec 1999 | GB |
8000727 | Apr 1980 | WO |
9326115 | Dec 1993 | WO |
9600836 | Jan 1996 | WO |
9624747 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9716751 | May 1997 | WO |
9737103 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9820233 | May 1998 | WO |
9960247 | May 1999 | WO |
9937044 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9957417 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0004275 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0037770 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0120126 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0155555 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030047308 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60186377 | Mar 2000 | US |