The present invention relates to industrial process control or monitoring systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to wireless process field devices used in such systems.
In industrial settings, systems are used to monitor and control inventories and operation of industrial and chemical processes, and the like. Typically, the system that performs these functions uses field devices distributed at key locations in the industrial process coupled to control circuitry in the control room by a process control loop. The term “field device” refers to any device that performs a function in a distributed control or process monitoring system, including all devices used in the measurement, control and monitoring of industrial processes.
Typically, each field device also includes communication circuitry that is used for communicating with a process controller, other field devices, or other circuitry, over the process control loop. In some installations, the process control loop is also used to deliver a regulated current and/or voltage to the field device for powering the field device. The process control loop also carries data, either in an analog or digital format.
In sonic installations, wireless technologies have begun to be used to communicate with field devices. Wireless operation simplifies field device wiring and setup. Wireless installations are currently used in which the field device includes an internal power source. However, because of power limitations, the functionality of such devices is typically limited.
Typically, field devices are used to sense or control process variables in an industrial process. However, in some installations, it may be desirable to monitor the local environment of the field device.
An industrial process monitor for monitoring an industrial process includes a controller configured to control operation of the industrial process monitor. An ambient environment sensor is configured to sense an ambient environment of the industrial process proximate the device and responsively provide a sensor output signal. Output circuitry is configured to provide an output based upon the sensor output signal. The controller causes the ambient environment sensor to enter a high power mode upon detection of an anomaly and/or probable anomaly in the sensor output signal.
This Summary and the Abstract are provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. The Summary and the Abstract are not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor are they intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Many high value monitoring applications which use monitoring techniques such as video, infrared, ultrasonic and audio require systems that can acquire information at high sampling rates and/or high resolutions. For example, a low resolution infrared monitoring system may be capable of monitoring an overall thermal profile. However, in order to specifically identify a location of a thermal anomaly high resolution is required. The capture and analysis of high resolution infrared images is needed to fully characterize the anomaly and to distinguish it from background noise or from expected thermal changes in the environment. However, the acquisition and processing of such high resolution images requires significant power. This quickly depletes the batteries of a self-powered field device such as a wireless field device. A similar problem exists with other techniques for monitoring an ambient environment, or example, audio and ultrasonic monitoring. In order to correctly characterize an acoustic event, high sampling rates are needed in order to analyze the spectral content so that a signal profile can be compared to a known acoustic signature, for example one which occurs when a system leaks.
The present invention offers techniques for addressing the above problem. A system is provided for monitoring the ambient environment which utilizes both a low power mode that is capable of acquiring data at low resolutions and/or sampling rates, and a high power mode that is only activated when the low power (pilot) mode detects a signal of potential interest. The present invention provides a technique for monitoring the ambient environment of an industrial process and relates to monitoring systems implemented in locally or internally powered wireless field devices. A wireless industrial process monitor is implemented in a field device and is configured to monitor an ambient environment in the industrial process. The monitoring may be through any appropriate ambient environment sensor including video, infrared, acoustic, or other. Such a sensor requires a high sampling frequency and/or high resolution in order to characterize and locate events of interest in the local (ambient) environment and to distinguish sensed signals related to these events from background noise. However, as high resolution and/or high sampling frequencies require an increased amount of power, a configuration is used in which a low energy “pilot mode” is implemented for normal operation. In this “pilot mode”, a low resolution initial measurement is obtained. If an anomaly is detected based upon this low resolution initial measurement, a high resolution, high power mode may be entered by the system. In the high power mode, data is collected at a high data rate and/or resolution. Subsequently, the device may re-enter the “pilot mode” for continued low power operation.
As field device 14 and 16 operate using limited power, their processing abilities and the amount of data which they are capable of transmitting is limited. In one aspect, the present invention includes a wireless field device such as device 14 and 16, which includes the ability to monitor the ambient environment using an ambient environment sensor. Wireless field devices which are capable of operating at remote locations that do not require an external power source are available from, for example, Rosemount Inc. of Chanhassen, Minn. Such devices are configured to measure process variables or obtain other process information and transmit information using wireless communication techniques such as the WirelessHART® protocol.
Controller 34 is typically a microprocessor based controller and couples to a memory 60 and a clock 62. The clock 62 determines the operation speed of digital circuitry within field device 14 and memory 60 is used to store information. Memory 60 can comprise both permanent and volatile memory and can be used to store data used during processing, programming instructions, calibration information, or other information, data or instructions for use with process device 14. Memory 60 also stores information from sensor 74 as described herein.
As discussed above, the device 14 operates in a “pilot mode” obtaining low resolution/data rate information from sensor 74 during normal operation. A wide area of environment 75 can be monitored by sensor 74. For example, if sensor 74 is an infrared sensor, sensor 74 can comprise a low power infrared camera which is energized periodically to capture low resolution images such as that shown in
A similar technique can be used for an acoustic monitoring system. For example, a low power pilot mode can be used to acquire acoustic data from the environment 75 at a low sample rate using sensor 74. The low sample rate data can be quickly analyzed in any appropriate way, including comparison of the low sample rate data to known normal acoustic profiles of the area stored in the memory 60 of device 14.
In addition to obtaining high resolution data or data at a higher sample rate, the field device 14 can operate at a high clock speed, for example, by adjusting clock 62. This allows controller 34 to operate at a higher speed to analyze the collected data. In one aspect, the system is configured to transmit information, for example, wirelessly using communication link 28, which indicates that the power available from battery 38 is insufficient for continued operation. For example, although the system is capable of continued “pilot mode” operation, the stored energy may be insufficient for the device to enter a high power mode for any significant period of time. When in this condition, the system may automatically transition into an alternate operating mode. Instead of entering a high spectral resolution mode when triggered, the system will omit this step and simply alert the user via the wireless network that an uncharacterized anomaly has been detected.
An anomaly may be detected using an appropriate technique. As discussed above, the collected data can be compared to known normal profiles. Other techniques include comparison of the collected data to thresholds in the time or frequency domain, monitoring for rapid changes or spikes in the collected data, monitoring for sudden drop outs in the collected data. The analysis may be done in the time or frequency domain, or some combination thereof. As used herein, the term “ambient environment sensor” refers to a sensor which is configured to sense an aspect of the ambient environment of the device 14. These may be image sensors including visible and infrared radiation, as well as acoustic sensors including both audible and ultrasonic acoustic sensors. In one configuration, the ambient environment sensor senses more than just a single data point, for example, such as a single data point provided by a temperature sensor. The particular sensor may be configured to operate in two modes of operation, a low power “pilot mode” for acquiring low resolution and/or low data rate information, as well as a high power mode for acquiring high resolution and/or high data rate information. In another configuration, a second ambient environment sensor is provided for high resolution/data rate data collection. In another example configuration, one or more devices 14 are provided for monitoring an environment in the “pilot mode.” Data collected during the “pilot mode” monitoring is transmitted to another location, for example, over communication link 28. This information may be received at a location which has a larger power source or is coupled to line power. The data can be used to trigger a high power mode in which high data rate/high resolution data collection from a sensor at the remote location. In another example configuration, the anomaly may be detected in one device 14, and a second device, such as device 16 shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As used herein, the ambient environment sensors preferably are configured to provide an output having a profile. The profile may be a plurality of pixels such as those which are used to an image, a plurality of amplitude or magnitude values such as from the sampled output of an acoustic sensor, or can be spectral content such as from an acoustic or image sensor. In the high power mode, the clock 62 can operate at a higher frequency such that controller 34 operates a faster processing rate. As used herein, the term “anomaly” includes an actual anomaly, an impending anomaly as well as a probably anomaly. A probable anomaly includes an anomaly which is more likely than not to have occurred. However, the threshold for what constitutes “probable” can be selected as desired.
The present application is a Continuation application and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/499,719, filed Sep. 29, 2014, the content of this application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3857277 | Moore | Dec 1974 | A |
4306457 | Fukui | Dec 1981 | A |
4736250 | Blazo | Apr 1988 | A |
4900161 | Wolf et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4947247 | Farver | Aug 1990 | A |
5056046 | Mutchler | Oct 1991 | A |
5109277 | James | Apr 1992 | A |
5144430 | Boelart | Sep 1992 | A |
5292195 | Crisman, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5638174 | Henderson | Jun 1997 | A |
5654977 | Morris | Aug 1997 | A |
6000844 | Cramer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6059453 | Kempf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6259810 | Gill et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6346704 | Kenway | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6461573 | Yamamoto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6518744 | Tallman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6573331 | Camberlin | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631287 | Newman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7208735 | Sierra et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7248297 | Catrysse et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7372485 | Bodnar et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7407323 | Hutcherson | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409867 | Toy et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7460024 | Ma | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7466240 | Evans et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472215 | Mok | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7636114 | Aoyama | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7680460 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7768425 | Evans et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809379 | Hedtke et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7852271 | Grunig et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7852383 | Harada | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8098302 | Fakuda et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108790 | Morrison, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121078 | Siann et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8191005 | Baier et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8208752 | Ishii | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8310541 | Moore | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8410946 | Ansari et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8538560 | Brown et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8706448 | Orth | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8898036 | Sittler et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9019108 | Chillar et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9049239 | Kenney et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9201414 | Kantzes et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9201419 | Timsjo et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9247374 | Tomimatsu et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9537699 | Kenney et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9696429 | Turon et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9711038 | Pennebaker, III | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9727115 | Brown | Aug 2017 | B1 |
10169860 | Spahn et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20010042834 | Kenway | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030027949 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040041538 | Sklovsky | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040156549 | Persiantsev | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040218099 | Washington | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245467 | Lannestedt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008072 | Angerer | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012817 | Hampapur et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025368 | Glukhovsky | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050111696 | Baer | May 2005 | A1 |
20050164684 | Chen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050220331 | Kychakoff et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060026971 | Sharpe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060092153 | Chu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060148410 | Nelson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060278827 | Sierra et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019077 | Park | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070052804 | Money et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073439 | Habibi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070125949 | Murata et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080155064 | Kosuge | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165195 | Rosenberg | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080210872 | Grimberg | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255637 | Oishi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278145 | Wenger | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090078047 | Dam | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090117949 | Allen, Jr. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090249405 | Karaoguz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285259 | Allen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100013918 | Ta ' Eed | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100220180 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110154900 | Watanabe | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110230942 | Herman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110317066 | Capman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025081 | Rapp et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041582 | Wallace | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120109342 | Braun et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109582 | Moriya | May 2012 | A1 |
20120157009 | Hollander | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161958 | Turon | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130009472 | Orth | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085688 | Miller | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099922 | Lohbihler | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120561 | Heintze | May 2013 | A1 |
20130163812 | Mukasa | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176418 | Pandey et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130222608 | Baer | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250125 | Garrow et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130294478 | Puroll et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140003465 | Elke | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140128118 | Tomimatsu | May 2014 | A1 |
20140183386 | Ravid | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140303793 | Anderson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140375820 | Priyantha et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022368 | Smith | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150116482 | Bronmark et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150130927 | Luxen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150330866 | Yang | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150362090 | Anderson | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160091370 | Schnaare | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002256070 | May 2006 | AU |
1214958 | Apr 1999 | CN |
2694128 | Apr 2005 | CN |
1882078 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101014091 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101019419 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101046375 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101277383 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101460971 | Jun 2009 | CN |
201322868 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101600046 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101647216 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101681161 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101685295 | Mar 2010 | CN |
1012483618 | May 2012 | CN |
102830669 | Dec 2012 | CN |
102999022 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103380446 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103947170 | Jul 2014 | CN |
204350309 | May 2015 | CN |
2 130 187 | Apr 2017 | EP |
52-140779 | Nov 1977 | JP |
53-86111 | Jul 1978 | JP |
S58-090882 | May 1983 | JP |
61-136340 | Jun 1986 | JP |
62-179647 | Aug 1987 | JP |
64-73880 | Mar 1989 | JP |
H07-325900 | Dec 1995 | JP |
H09-265316 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10-47312 | Feb 1998 | JP |
H10-294933 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-23350 | Jan 1999 | JP |
H11-75176 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-189603 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-218442 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-310577 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-84031 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-221666 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-238198 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-256475 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-300569 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004-288092 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-134357 | May 2005 | JP |
2006-031418 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007-108836 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008-527493 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-257513 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-210042 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2012-175631 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010-536092 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2010-283444 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-185926 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011-209033 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-037519 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-58093 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013-009079 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013-533570 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2014-523033 | Sep 2014 | JP |
2 372 667 | Nov 2009 | RU |
2419926 | May 2011 | RU |
I220364 | Aug 2004 | TW |
WO 2004011935 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006081154 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007139123 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008136752 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009074708 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2011004020 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011137264 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2013006307 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013009715 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013006307 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
DF-TV7-T, Multi-Spectrum 3IR Flame Detector, Groveley Detection Ltd., 2 pgs. no date. |
DF-TV7-V, Combined UV/2IR Flame Detector, Groveley Detection Ltd., 2 pgs. no date. |
FDS301, Visual Flame Detector FDS301, Groveley Detection Ltd., 2 pgs. no date. |
Hardesty, Larry. (MIT News Office). MIT News “Researchers amplify variations in video, making the invisible visible,” dated Jun. 22, 2012, 3 pgs. Found at http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/amplifying-invisible-video-0622.html. |
First Correct Notification for Chinese Patent Application No. 201420426405.7, dated Oct. 31, 2014, 4 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2014/051625, dated Oct. 23, 2014. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201320868039.6, dated May 19, 2014. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2014/051432, dated Jan. 12, 2015. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, PCT/US2014/051628, dated Nov. 25, 2014. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2014/069968, dated Mar. 19, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2014/051628, dated Apr. 13, 2015. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,814, dated Jul. 8, 2015. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,858, dated Jun. 12, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2015/011958, dated May 18, 2015. |
“Integrated Wireless Gas Detection Solution”, www.gassecure.com, Jun. 2014, 2 pgs. |
“GS01 Wireless Gas Detector”, www.gassecure.com, Jun. 2014, 2 pgs. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,858, dated Oct. 2, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2015/040310, dated Nov. 11, 2015. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,814, dated Feb. 1, 2016. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,858, dated Feb. 5, 2016. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,814, dated Jun. 15, 2016. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Jun. 3, 2016. |
Office Action from European Application Serial No. 14761468.9, dated May 4, 2016. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,090, dated Jun. 28, 2016. |
Office Action from European Application Serial No. 14761467.1, dated May 4, 2016. |
Office Action from Russian Application Serial No. 2016116020, dated May 31, 2016. |
Office Action from European Application Serial No. 14783924.5, dated Jun. 3, 2016. |
Examination Report from Australian Application Serial No. 2014328576, dated Jul. 21, 2016. |
Office Action from Chinese Application Serial No. 201310737591.6, dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
Examination Report from Australian Application Serial No. 2014328666, dated Oct. 11, 2016. |
Office Action from Chinese Application Serial No. 201410024656.7, dated Oct. 9, 2016. |
Office Action from Canadian Application Serial No. 2,923,153, dated Jan. 16, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410061865.9 dated Oct. 28, 2016. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 15706956.8, dated Nov. 7, 2016. |
Office Action from Canadian Application Serial No. 2,923, 156, dated Feb. 2, 2017. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Feb. 10, 2017. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Mar. 23, 2017. |
Office Action (including Search Report) from Russian Application Serial No. 2016116020, dated Feb. 10, 2017. |
Office Action from Australian Patent Application No. 2014328576, dated Feb. 24, 2017. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,159, dated Mar. 7, 2017. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-516988, dated Mar. 24, 2017. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-516983, dated Mar. 8, 2017. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,159 dated May 19, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410366848.6, dated Feb. 24, 2017. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 15744804.4, dated May 9, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201310737591.6, dated Jun. 1, 2017. |
Examination Report No. 2 from Australian Patent Application No. 2014328666, dated Jun. 16, 2017. |
“ADNS-5090 Low Power Optical Mouse Sensor Data Sheet”, Avago Technologies, dated Apr. 25, 2012. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410024656.7, dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-517425, dated Jun. 6, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410061865.9, dated Jun. 9, 2017. |
Third Examination Report from Australian Patent Application No. 2014328576, dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,090, dated Jul. 28, 2017. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,943,542, dated Jul. 31, 2017. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Aug. 18, 2017. |
Office Action from Russian Patent Application No. 2016116017, dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
“Heat Transfer Performance for Batch Oscillatory Flow Mixing”, by Stephens et al., Elsevier 2002. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated Oct. 24, 2016. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated May 17, 2017. |
Office Action from Russian Patent Application No. 2016116039, dated Jul. 13, 2017. |
Third Examination Report from Australian Patent Application No. 2014328666, dated Oct. 10, 2017. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-558794, dated Oct. 24, 2017. |
Examination Report from Australian Patent Application No. 2015324515 dated Sep. 4, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410366848.6, dated Nov. 6, 2017. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Oct. 6, 2017. |
Final Rejection from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-516988, dated Nov. 8, 2017, 11 pages. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,156, dated Nov. 30, 2017. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,957,246, dated Dec. 8, 2017. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,090, dated Jan. 24, 2018, 33 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated Nov. 2, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201310737591.6, dated Nov. 29, 2017. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-516983, dated Dec. 6, 2017. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,153, dated Dec. 13, 2017. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410831781.9, dated Nov. 28, 2017, 13 pages. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410024656.7 dated Dec. 28, 2017. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-517425, dated Jan. 9, 2018. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-516333, dated Mar. 20, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Dec. 29, 2017. |
Office Action from European Patent Application No. 14783924.5, dated Mar. 16, 2018. |
Office Action from Russian Patent Application No. 2017114674, dated May 31, 2018. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,957,246, dated Jul. 30, 2018. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-516333, dated Jul. 31, 2018. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201310737591.6, dated May 24, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Aug. 16, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,090, dated Aug. 9, 2018. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,156, dated Jun. 19, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated Oct. 19, 2018. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410024656.7, dated Sep. 20, 2018. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410831781.9, dated Aug. 9, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,153, dated Aug. 24, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Nov. 29, 2018. |
Office Action from Russian Patent Application No. 2017114674, dated Oct. 26, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated Apr. 5, 2018. |
Trial Decision from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-516988 (Appeal No. 2017-18657), dated Oct. 31, 2018. |
Examination Report from Indian Patent Application No. 201627005256, dated Dec. 22, 2018. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,090, dated Feb. 7, 2019. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 15744804.4, dated Jan. 31, 2019. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410831781.9, dated Mar. 4, 2019. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-516333, dated Dec. 18, 2018. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated May 16, 2019. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,156, dated Mar. 21, 2019. |
Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,923,153 dated Mar. 21, 2019. |
Examination Report from Indian Patent Application No. 201627004690, dated Mar. 27, 2019. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Jun. 6, 2019. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,090, dated Jun. 28, 2019. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-004260, dated May 28, 2019. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 14761467.1, dated May 29, 2019. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410024656.7, dated Jun. 20, 2019. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Aug. 21, 2019. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Sep. 17, 2019. |
Office Action from Australian Patent Application No. 2018222951, dated Jul. 12, 2019. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated Oct. 4, 2019. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410831781.9, dated Sep. 18, 2019. |
Appeal Decision from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-517425, dated Oct. 29, 2019. |
Examination Report from Indian Patent Application No. 201627004614, dated Dec. 12, 2019. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 14761468.9, dated Nov. 7, 2019. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 14761467.1, dated Dec. 5, 2019. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 14783924.5, dated Jan. 2, 2020. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Mar. 2, 2020. |
Examination Report No. 2 from Australian Patent Application No. 2018222951, dated Mar. 4, 2020. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Mar. 10, 2020. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/038,185, dated Apr. 16, 2020. |
Examination Report from Indian Patent Application No. 201727002213, dated Apr. 30, 2020. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201410831781.9, dated Jun. 22, 2020. |
Communication from European Patent Application No. 14761468.9, dated Jul. 29, 2020. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/037,989, dated Oct. 16, 2020. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Oct. 6, 2020. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Dec. 15, 2017. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated May 1, 2019. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated May 29, 2020. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,719, dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
Hearing Notice from Indian Patent Application No. 201727002213, dated Nov. 28, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210148763 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14499719 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 17156907 | US |