The present invention relates generally to wireless local area networks (WLANs) and, particularly, the present invention relates to extending the coverage area associated with a WLAN repeater using Automatic Gain Control (AGC).
Several standard protocols for wireless local area networks, commonly referred to as WLANs, are becoming popular. These include protocols such as 802.11 (as set forth in the 802.11 wireless standards), home RF, and Bluetooth. The standard wireless protocol with the most commercial success to date is the 802.11b protocol although next generation protocols, such as 802.11g, are also gaining popularity.
While the specifications of products utilizing the above standard wireless protocols commonly indicate data rates on the order of, for example, 11 MBPS and ranges on the order of, for example, 100 meters, these performance levels are rarely, if ever, realized. Performance shortcomings between actual and specified performance levels have many causes including attenuation of the radiation paths of RF signals, which for 802.11b are in the range of 2.4 GHz in an operating environment such as an indoor environment. Access point to client ranges are generally less than the coverage range required in a typical home, and may be as little as 10 to 15 meters. Further, in structures having split floor plans, such as ranch style or two story homes, or those constructed of materials capable of attenuating RF signals, areas in which wireless coverage is needed may be physically separated by distances outside of the range of, for example, an 802.11 protocol based system. Attenuation problems may be exacerbated in the presence of interference in the operating band, such as interference from other 2.4 GHz devices or wideband interference with in-band energy. Still further, data rates of devices operating using the above standard wireless protocols are dependent on signal strength. As distances in the area of coverage increase, wireless system performance typically decreases. Lastly, the structure of the protocols themselves may affect the operational range.
Repeaters are commonly used in the mobile wireless industry to increase the range of wireless systems. However, problems and complications arise in that system receivers and transmitters may operate at the same frequency in a WLAN utilizing, for example, 802.11 WLAN or 802.16 WMAN wireless protocols. In such systems, when multiple transmitters operate simultaneously, as would be the case in repeater operation, difficulties arise. Typical WLAN protocols provide no defined receive and transmit periods and, thus, because random packets from each wireless network node are spontaneously generated and transmitted and are not temporally predictable, packet collisions may occur. Some remedies exist to address such difficulties, such as, for example, collision avoidance and random back-off protocols, which are used to avoid two or more nodes transmitting packets at the same time. Under 802.11 standard protocol, for example, a distributed coordination function (DCF) may be used for collision avoidance.
Such operation is significantly different than the operation of many other cellular repeater systems, such as those systems based on IS-136, IS-95 or IS-2000 standards, where the receive and transmit bands are separated by a deplexing frequency offset. Frequency division duplexing (FDD) operation simplifies repeater operation since conflicts associated with repeater operation, such as those arising in situations where the receiver and transmitter channels are on the same frequency for both the uplink and the downlink, are not present.
Other cellular mobile systems separate receive and transmit channels by time rather than by frequency and further utilize scheduled times for specific uplink/downlink transmissions. Such operation is commonly referred to as time division duplexing (TDD). Repeaters for these systems are more easily built, as the transmission and reception times are well known and are broadcast by a base station. Receivers and transmitters for these systems may be isolated by any number of means including physical separation, antenna patterns, or polarization isolation. Even for these systems, the cost and complexity of a repeater may be greatly reduced by not offering the known timing information that is broadcast, thus allowing for economically feasible repeaters.
Thus, WLAN repeaters operating on the same frequencies have unique constraints due to the above spontaneous transmission capabilities and therefore require a unique solution. Since these repeaters use the same frequency for receive and transmit channels, some form of isolation must exist between the receive and transmit channels of the repeater. While some related systems such as, for example, CDMA systems used in wireless telephony, achieve channel isolation using sophisticated techniques such as directional antennas, physical separation of the receive and transmit antennas, or the like, such techniques are not practical for WLAN repeaters in many operating environments such as in the home where complicated hardware or lengthy cabling is not desirable or may be too costly.
One system, described in International Application No. PCT/US03/16208 and commonly owned by the assignee of the present application, resolves many of the above identified problems by providing a repeater which isolates receive and transmit channels using a frequency detection and translation method. The WLAN repeater described therein allows two WLAN units to communicate by translating packets associated with one device at a first frequency channel to a second frequency channel used by a second device. The direction associated with the translation or conversion, such as from the frequency associated with the first channel to the frequency associated with the second channel, or from the second channel to the first channel, depends upon a real time configuration of the repeater and the WLAN environment. The WLAN repeater may be configured to monitor both channels for transmissions and, when a transmission is detected, translate the received signal at the first frequency to the other channel, where it is transmitted at the second frequency.
The above described approach solves both the isolation issue and the spontaneous transmission problems as described above by monitoring and translating in response to packet transmissions and may further be implemented in a small inexpensive unit. However, a WLAN repeater, in order to be legally compliant, must transmit within the power and spectrum limitations promulgated by, for example, the FCC. Difficulties arise however in that a received signal may have a widely varying power level requiring precise compensation for factors contributing to disruptions and failed or suboptimal signal retransmission caused by interference and the like.
Accordingly, in various exemplary and alternative exemplary embodiments, the present invention extends the coverage area in a wireless environment such as a WLAN environment, and, broadly speaking, in any time division duplex system including IEEE 802.16, IEEE 802.20 and TDS-CDMA, with a unique frequency detection and translation method. An exemplary WLAN frequency translating repeater allows two WLAN nodes or units to communicate by translating packets from a first frequency channel used by one device to a second frequency channel used by a second device. The direction of the conversion from channel 1 to channel 2, verses from channel 2 to Channel 1, is dependent upon real time configuration. The repeater may preferably monitor both channels for transmissions, and when a transmission on a channel is detected, the repeater is configured to translate the received signal to the other channel, where it is transmitted.
In a preferred embodiment, the signal received is detected on a first signal path and gain is applied on a second signal path. Further, the gain signal path preferably includes delay circuits to permit signal detection and gain setting to occur before the signal must be retransmitted. The gain is set based upon the detected receive power level to achieve a target transmit power level that is constant independent of the receive power level. However, the target power may be first determined or adjusted based upon criteria that includes one or more of the following: separation between receive and transmit frequencies, regulatory rule compliance, temperature, received power level, transmit power level and detected interference. A microprocessor with software, including calibration tables, is appropriate for performing the calculation of an appropriate gain set point, which fixes the target output power. The details of this invention are described in detail in the figure descriptions that follow.
The preferred approach solves both the isolation issue, allowing a small inexpensive unit, and it solves the spontaneous transmission problem as it monitors and responds in reaction to the transmissions, with a constant output power at the transmitter. This output power may be different depending on the configuration of the repeater as determined by the microprocessor.
Referring now to
While the signal carried over RF path 102 is of sufficient strength to maintain high-speed data packet communications between the client unit 104 and the wireless gateway 100, the signals carried over the RF path 103 and intended for the client unit 105 would be attenuated when passing through a structural barrier such as walls 106 or 107 to a point where few, if any, data packets are received in either direction if not for a wireless repeater 200, the structure and operation of which will now be described.
To enhance the coverage and/or communication data rate to the client unit 105, wireless repeater 200 receives packets transmitted on a first frequency channel 201 from the wireless gateway 100. The wireless repeater 200, which may be housed in an enclosure typically having dimensions of, for example, 2.5″×3.5″×0.5″, and which preferably is capable of being plugged into a standard electrical outlet and operating on 110 V AC power, detects the presence of a packet on the first frequency channel 201, receives the packet and re-transmits the packet with more power on a second frequency channel 202. Unlike conventional WLAN operating protocols, the client unit 105 operates on the second frequency channel, even though the wireless gateway 100 operates on the first frequency channel. To perform the return packet operation, the wireless repeater 200 detects the presence of a transmitted packet on the second frequency channel 202 from the client unit 105, receives the packet on the second frequency channel 202, and re-transmits the packet on the first frequency channel 201. The wireless gateway 100 then receives the packet on the first frequency channel 201. In this way, the wireless repeater 200 is capable of simultaneously receiving and transmitting signals as well as extending the coverage and performance of the wireless gateway 100 to the client unit 105.
To address the difficulties posed by obstructions as described above and attendant attenuation of the signal strength along obstructed paths and thus to enhance the coverage and/or communication data rate to client unit 105, exemplary wireless repeater 200, as shown in
Wireless repeater 200 is preferably capable of receiving two different frequencies simultaneously, such as first frequency channel 201 and second frequency channel 202 determining which channel is carrying a signal associated with, for example, the transmission of a packet, translating from the original frequency channel to an alternative frequency channel and retransmitting the frequency translated version of the received signal on the alternative channel. Details of internal repeater operation may be found in co-pending PCT Application No. PCT/US03/16208.
Repeater 200 may thus receive and transmit packets at the same time on different frequency channels thereby extending the coverage and performance of the connection between AP 100 and client unit 105, and between peer-to-peer connections such as from one client unit to another client unit. When many units are isolated from one another, repeater unit 200 further acts as a wireless bridge allowing two different groups of units to communicate where optimum RF propagation and coverage or, in many cases, any RF propagation and coverage was not previously possible.
In accordance with various exemplary embodiments, repeater 200 is preferably configured to receive a signal and translate the frequency of the received signal with very little distortion or loss of the signal by properly controlling the gain of an exemplary transceiver section via Automatic Gain Control (AGC) circuitry 300 shown, for example, in
In accordance with one preferred exemplary embodiment, AGC circuitry 300 utilizes RF delay and filter elements 307-310 to allow analog storage of an exemplary received waveform while signal detection and transmitter configuration takes place. It should be noted that signal detection may occur both prior to and during transit of signals in RF delay elements 307-310 providing time to perform system configuration. It should be noted that a detector power level is preferably used to set a gain value on a parallel signal path as part of the gain control operation.
Repeater AGC circuitry 300 further includes logarithmic amplifier 301 and 302, AGC control circuit 303 and 304, gain control element 305 and 306, which may preferably include variable gain or variable attenuator elements, and RF delay element 307-310 which may preferably include analog storage devices such as, for example, delay lines and/or band pass filters. Low pass filter 311 and 312, and analog to digital converter (ADC) 313 and 314 are further preferably used to accomplish gain control under the direction and control of, for example, microprocessor 315.
Since repeater 200, in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, is configured to simultaneously detect and process two different frequency signals, received signal 330 is split and propagated on two different RF paths, for example, using RF splitter 316. Likewise, because the two different frequency paths must be delayed and controlled separately, each signal path is further split by, for example, IF Splitters 317 and 318. One of the split signal outputs from IF Splitter 317 is preferably coupled to logarithmic amplifiers 301 and the other split signal output is preferably coupled to gain control elements 305. Likewise, one of the split signal outputs from IF Splitter 318 is preferably coupled to logarithmic amplifiers 302 and the other split signal output is preferably coupled to gain control elements 306. The output of logarithmic amplifiers 301 is fed to AGC control circuit 303 and low pass filter 311. Likewise, the output of logarithmic amplifiers 302 is fed to AGC control circuit 304 and low pass filter 312. It should be noted that while logarithmic amplifiers 301 and 302 preferably provide an output voltage proportional to the logarithm of the power of received signal 330, tracking the envelope thereof, other devices known to those of ordinary skill in the art may also be used to track the envelope or samples of the envelope directly or proportionately.
The basic operation of components along the detection path of received signal 330 such as, for example, low pass filters 311 and 312, analog-to-digital converters (ADC) 313 and 314, and processor 315 for example, would be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and thus a detailed review of the basic operation thereof is omitted, such operation is disclosed in detail in commonly assigned co-pending PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US03/16208. However it should be briefly noted that processor 315 preferably detects the presence of an IF signal on detection paths DET1331 and DET2332. As described in the above identified co-pending application, signal detection may be based on the signal level exceeding a threshold using, for example, analog or digital signal comparison implements in processor 315, or could be performed by other means well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Once the signal is detected, gain control is applied to the signal using for example, AGC control circuits 303 and 304 on IF path IF1333 or IF2334 respectively, depending on the channel.
With reference still to
As an example of gain control in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, a variable attenuator could be used for gain control element 305 under the following conditions: desired output power +15 dBm, received signal power −80 dBm, total transceiver losses 65 dB, total transceiver gains 165 dB.
Under these conditions, a variable attenuator associated with, for example, gain control element 305, should be set according to the relation: Rx Signal Power−Desired Output Power+Total Gains−Total Losses, thus the attenuation would be−80 dBm−15 dBm+165 dB−65 dB resulting in 5 dB of attenuation. It will be appreciated that a voltage may be calculated and applied to the gain control element 305, for example, by AGC control circuit 303 resulting in the desired 5 dB attenuation setting. It should also be noted that while ACG control circuit 303 and gain control element 305 are described herein, the above description applies to the operation of AGC control circuit 304 and gain control element 306.
Thus receive signal 330 in order to be retransmitted in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, and in accordance with the present example, is preferably output from gain control element 305 and delayed via Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) filters 308 and 310. It will be appreciated that the delay introduced by SAW filters 308 and 310 acts to essentially store the analog waveform while AGC and signal detection processes, for example as described above, are carried out, meaning that detection and gain control setting are preferably completed during the propagation interval of the signal.
In accordance with various exemplary and preferred exemplary embodiments, RF delays are imposed through SAW filters 307-310 enabling analog signal storage and channel selection, jammer suppression, and a feed-forward variable gain control path. AGC control circuits 303 and 304 and gain control elements 305 and 306 may be biased or otherwise set under control of for example processor 315, which is preferably a micro-processor, such as a general purpose processor, dedicated processor, signal processing processor, or the like as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Further, set points may be obtained by processor 315 from a look up table or the like depending on which channel received signal 330 is received on and which channel is selected for signal retransmission. It should be noted that different bands have different transmit power limitations in different countries, thus the selection of gain set points may be driven by several factors resulting from the need to meet FCC requirements and related specifications for the desired band such as spectral re-growth and Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP).
After detection and setting of the gain control, IF Switch 319 and LO Switch 320 are preferably set to retransmit received signal 330 at a different frequency without significantly cutting off the waveform preamble. It is important to note that detection and power sensing, for example, as described above, is preferably performed on detector paths DET1331 and DET2332, but actual gain control may be applied the on IF paths IF1333 and IF2334. More specifically referring again to
One factor in determining a sequence of signal detection and gain control is the effect caused by splitting the output voltage from logarithmic amplifiers 301 and 302 into a signal detection path and a gain control path, each having potentially two different filter bandwidths. As can be noted from
It should be noted that in accordance with various exemplary and preferred exemplary embodiments, two separate detectors are used for performing detection of the presence of received signal 330 and for detection of the power level thereof in order to set gain. Thus, since signal detection may occur more slowly than AGC as described, different signal detection and AGC filter bandwidths may be used beneficially, allowing variable control elements associated with AGC such as gain control elements 305 and 306 to have a faster or slower response than the output of filters 311 and 312.
Another factor in controlling gain is the relative distance between the receive and transmit channels. Specifically, depending on the distance therebetween, the target output power or set point from the gain control elements 305 and 306 can be different to the extent that additional performance may be gained when the receive and transmit channels are further apart in frequency. Gain values may be increased in gain control elements 305 and 306 while continuing to meet performance requirements. Further, AGC control circuits 303 and 304 may be programmed to increase power based on the frequency difference or, alternatively, processor 315 may be programmed to control AGC control circuits 303 and 304 based on frequency separation. Adjusting set points based on frequency separation may further include applying more filtering to any leakage signals picked up by a receiver to avoid self interference.
A factor affecting the choice of which channels to operate on during initial repeater power up may be influenced by choosing repeating channels based on the ability to transmit more power in different FCC bands or bands controlled by other regulatory bodies. For example, in the U-NII bands for operation in the United States, the maximum allowable transmit power for CH36-48 is 50 mW, for CH52-64 is 250 mW, and for CH149-161 is 1 W. Therefore it is possible to receive a signal in on a channel associated with one of the lower power bands and choose a channel on a different band allowing higher transmit power, thereby allowing a higher AGC set point. Thus the set points for a translation, say from F1 to F2 and F2 to F1 would be different. The decision of which channels to select is preferably pre-programmed during manufacturing, or, alternatively could be programmed in the field, in, for example, AGC control circuits 303 and 304 or processor 315.
In accordance with other aspects of the present invention, gain control may require AGC calibration during initial manufacturing. Calibration may be desirable to allow the use of lower tolerance parts thus reducing cost. Calibration may further provide for accuracy required for regional or band specific power settings. Accordingly, calibration may include setting up circuits and devices in accordance with one or more of the following; regional regulatory rules, frequency channel, received power level, transmit power level, temperature, and the like. In accordance with various exemplary and preferred exemplary embodiments, repeater 200 using, for example, processor 315, may store calibration tables and the like and be configured, for example through the use of software, programs, instructions or the like, to pass specific calibration values to AGC control circuits 305 and 306. Processor 315 would preferably utilize a digital to analog conversion process to control the set point.
As mentioned above, different detector outputs may be used for AGC and signal detection. Signal detection may be performed in an analog only configuration using, for example, a threshold comparator under the control of processor 315 which may be configured to actively control, for example, an analog reference voltage a threshold comparator uses to make the detection decision. Alternatively, received signal 330 may be digitized and a detection decision made, for example, in processor 315. Once concern related to using a digital path and processor 315 includes delay associated with, for example, digital sampling and decision making instructions in a processor 315.
In accordance with various alternative exemplary embodiments an analog comparator (not shown) having a threshold controlled by processor 315 may be used. Such a configuration could be equipped with a digital override to allow for a fast initial decision, converging to a slower more accurate and controllable decision using software, programs, instructions, and the like readable and executable by processor 315. For example, if an interferer is detected, and processor 315 recognizes that the packet duration is longer than the wireless protocol will allow, AGC control circuits 303 and 304 and/or detector could be turned off by processor 315 to prevent signal transmission. Thus the normal AGC setting may be directly controlled and overridden. Such control is further useful in situations including when a system feed-back oscillation is detected.
One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various techniques can be utilized to determine AGC set points as well as different signal detector configurations in the present invention. Additionally, various components, such as the gain control elements 305 and 306, AGC gain control 303 and 304, functionality of processor 315 and other elements could be combined into a single integrated device. Other changes and alterations to specific components, and the interconnections thereof, can be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without deviating from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
The invention has been described in detail with particular references to presently preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is related to and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/418,288 filed Oct. 15, 2002, and is further related to PCT Application PCT/US03/16208 entitled WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK REPEATER, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/29130 | 10/15/2003 | WO | 00 | 4/12/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/036789 | 4/29/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3363250 | Jacobson | Jan 1968 | A |
4000467 | Lentz | Dec 1976 | A |
4001691 | Gruenberg et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4061970 | Magneron | Dec 1977 | A |
4081752 | Sumi et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4124825 | Webb et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4204016 | Chavannes et al. | May 1980 | A |
4334323 | Moore et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4368541 | Evans et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4509206 | Carpe et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4701935 | Namiki et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4723302 | Fulmer et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4777653 | Bonnerot et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4783843 | Leff et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4820568 | Harpell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4922259 | Hall et al. | May 1990 | A |
5023930 | Leslie et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5095528 | Leslie et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5214788 | Delaperriere et al. | May 1993 | A |
5220562 | Takada et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5280480 | Pitt et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5333175 | Ariyavisitakul et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341364 | Marra et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349463 | Hirohashi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368897 | Kurihara et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371734 | Fischer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373503 | Chen et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383144 | Kato | Jan 1995 | A |
5408197 | Miyake | Apr 1995 | A |
5408618 | Aho et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5430726 | Moorwood et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5446770 | Urabe et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465251 | Judd et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471642 | Palmer et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5485486 | Gilhousen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509028 | Marque-Pucheu et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515376 | Murthy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519619 | Seda | May 1996 | A |
5608755 | Rakib | Mar 1997 | A |
5610916 | Kostreski et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648984 | Kroninger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654979 | Levin et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659879 | Dupuy et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5678177 | Beasley | Oct 1997 | A |
5678198 | Lemson | Oct 1997 | A |
5684801 | Amitay et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697052 | Treatch et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726980 | Rickard | Mar 1998 | A |
5732334 | Miyake | Mar 1998 | A |
5745846 | Myer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754540 | Liu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764636 | Edsall et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767788 | Ness | Jun 1998 | A |
5771174 | Spinner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784683 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794145 | Milam et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812933 | Niki | Sep 1998 | A |
5815795 | Iwai | Sep 1998 | A |
5825809 | Sim | Oct 1998 | A |
5852629 | Iwamatsu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857144 | Mangum et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862207 | Aoshima | Jan 1999 | A |
5875179 | Tikalsky et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883884 | Atkinson | Mar 1999 | A |
5884181 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890055 | Chu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903553 | Sakamoto et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907794 | Lehmusto et al. | May 1999 | A |
5963846 | Kurby et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963847 | Ito et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987304 | Latt et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005855 | Zehavi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005884 | Cook et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014380 | Hendel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032194 | Gai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6061548 | Reudink et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088570 | Komara et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101400 | Ogaz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108364 | Weaver, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128512 | Trompower et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128729 | Kimball et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6163276 | Irving et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188694 | Fine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188719 | Collomby et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195051 | McCoy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202114 | Dutt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215982 | Trompower et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219739 | Dutt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222503 | Gietema et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6272351 | Langston et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285863 | Zhang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298061 | Chin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304563 | Blessent et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304575 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331792 | Tonietto et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339694 | Komara et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342777 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363068 | Kinoshita et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370185 | Schmutz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370369 | Kraiem et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377612 | Baker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377640 | Trans et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6384765 | Sjostrand et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385181 | Tsutsui et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388995 | Gai et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393299 | Mizumoto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404775 | Leslie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441781 | Rog et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473131 | Neugebauer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480481 | Park et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501955 | Durrant et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535732 | McIntosh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539028 | Soh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539204 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549542 | Dong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549567 | Fullerton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563468 | Hill et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6574198 | Petersson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6628624 | Mahajan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6664932 | Sabet et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671502 | Ogawa | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684058 | Karacaoglu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690657 | Lau et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694125 | White et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6718160 | Schmutz et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728541 | Ohkura et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6766113 | Al-Salameh et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6781544 | Saliga et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788256 | Hollister | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6880103 | Kim et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888881 | Nagano | May 2005 | B1 |
6904266 | Jin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906669 | Sabet et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6934511 | Lovinggood et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934555 | Silva et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944139 | Campanella et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6957042 | Williams et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983162 | Garani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985516 | Easton et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990313 | Yarkosky | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7027418 | Gan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027770 | Judd et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043203 | Miquel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050442 | Proctor et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7050452 | Sugar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058071 | Myles et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058368 | Nicholls et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7088734 | Newberg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103344 | Menard et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120930 | Maufer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123670 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123676 | Gebara et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132988 | Yegin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133391 | Belcea et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133460 | Bae et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139527 | Tamaki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167526 | Liang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187904 | Gainey et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193975 | Tsutsumi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194275 | Bolin et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200134 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215964 | Miyake et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233771 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248645 | Vialle et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254132 | Takao et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7315573 | Lusky et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319714 | Sakata et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321787 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339926 | Stanwood et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352696 | Stephens et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7409186 | Van Buren et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430397 | Suda et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7450936 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457587 | Chung | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7486929 | Van Buren et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7577398 | Judd et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590145 | Futch et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7623826 | Pergal | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7676194 | Rappaport et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729669 | Van Buren et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20010018328 | Ohkura et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031646 | Williams et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040699 | Osawa et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010050580 | O'toole et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050906 | Odenwalder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054060 | Fillebrown et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004924 | Kim et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020018487 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034958 | Oberschmidt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045461 | Bongfeldt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061031 | Sugar et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020089945 | Belcea et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101843 | Sheng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020102948 | Stanwood et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109585 | Sanderson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115409 | Khayrallah et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119783 | Bourlas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020136268 | Gan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141435 | Newberg et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159506 | Alamouti et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163902 | Takao et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177401 | Judd et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030026363 | Stoter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063583 | Padovani et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030124976 | Tamaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139175 | Kim et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179734 | Tsutsumi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185163 | Bertonis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211828 | Dalgleish et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030235170 | Trainin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236069 | Sakata et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040029537 | Pugel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038707 | Kim et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047333 | Han et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047335 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040110469 | Judd et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131025 | Dohler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146013 | Song et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157551 | Gainey et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166802 | McKay, Sr. et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176050 | Steer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198295 | Nicholls et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208258 | Lozano et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218683 | Batra et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229563 | Fitton et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235417 | Dean | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248581 | Seki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264511 | Futch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014464 | Larsson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030891 | Stephens et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042999 | Rappaport et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050190822 | Fujii et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201315 | Lakkis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050254442 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256963 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286448 | Proctor et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028388 | Schantz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035643 | Vook et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041680 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052066 | Cleveland et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052099 | Parker | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056352 | Proctor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063484 | Proctor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098592 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060183421 | Proctor et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203757 | Young et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060262026 | Gainey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070025349 | Bajic | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025486 | Gainey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032192 | Gainey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070121546 | Zuckerman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070286110 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080057862 | Smith | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1186401 | Jul 1998 | CN |
0523687 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0709973 | May 1996 | EP |
0715423 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0847146 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0853393 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0860953 | Aug 1998 | EP |
2272599 | May 1994 | GB |
2351420 | Dec 2000 | GB |
62040895 | Feb 1987 | JP |
63160442 | Jul 1988 | JP |
64011428 | Jan 1989 | JP |
02100358 | Apr 1990 | JP |
03021884 | Jan 1991 | JP |
05063623 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05102907 | Apr 1993 | JP |
06013947 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06334577 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07030473 | Jan 1995 | JP |
7079187 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07079205 | Mar 1995 | JP |
7131401 | May 1995 | JP |
8097762 | Apr 1996 | JP |
08274706 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09018484 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9130322 | May 1997 | JP |
9162801 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9162903 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09182155 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09214418 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10032557 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10107727 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10135892 | May 1998 | JP |
11055713 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11127104 | May 1999 | JP |
11298421 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000031877 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000502218 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000082983 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000236290 | Aug 2000 | JP |
20000269873 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001016152 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001111575 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001136115 | May 2001 | JP |
2001244864 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002033691 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002111571 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002271255 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003174394 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003198442 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003244050 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004056210 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004328666 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005072646 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005110150 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005236626 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005531202 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005531265 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006503481 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006505146 | Feb 2006 | JP |
100601929 | Aug 2006 | KR |
2120702 | Oct 1998 | RU |
WO9214339 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO9715991 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9734434 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9858461 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9959264 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0050971 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0152447 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0182512 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0199308 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0208857 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0217572 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO03013005 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO2004001892 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004001986 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004002014 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004002014 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004004365 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2004032362 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004036789 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004038958 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004062305 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2005115022 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060063485 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60418288 | Oct 2002 | US |