1. Field of the Invention
The present description generally relates to gaming, and in particular to games played with playing cards.
2. Description of the Related Art
Casinos and other forms of gaming are a multi-billion dollar worldwide industry. Typically, a player exchanges currency or a form of credit for a casino's chips. The player places the chips as wagers at various games, such as blackjack, baccarat, poker, and other well-known card games. A game operator, such as a dealer, distributes or deals the playing cards, pays out winning wagers with additional chips based on the set of odds for the particular game, and/or collects losing wagers. The odds of each game slightly favor the casino, so on average the casino wins and is profitable.
Thousands of card hands may be dealt per hour. Like many businesses, casinos wish to monitor these transactions as closely as possible. Monitoring may help the casino identify cheating by players and/or dealers. Monitoring may also allow the automation of various functions such as accounting to improve business efficiency, servicing of the tables including the delivery of extra chips when needed, and/or may providing incentives (i.e., “comps”) to players based on their activity at the gaming table. Many casinos employ individuals commonly referred to as “pit bosses” to visually monitor the gaming activity including the dealing of cards, placing of wagers, payout of winning wagers and collection of losing wagers. A number of automated devices have been proposed for assisting casinos in monitoring the gaming activity. For example, card readers which optically or magnetically scan either standard or special markings on the playing cards to identify the playing cards as they are dealt. Optical scanners have also been proposed for reading markings carried by wagering chips, such as barcodes. Further, radio frequency identification (“RFID”) transceivers have been proposed for reading RFID tags incorporated in wagering chips.
The use of optical markings have a number of distinct drawbacks. For example, these markings degrade during use for example due to excessive handling and/or spills or stains, and thus become difficult or impossible to read. Optical markings are also difficult to read in the uncontrolled visual environment common in casinos. For example, optical systems rely on line-of-sight, which may be blocked in the uncontrolled visual environment of a gaming table, for example, by a drink or other object placed on the gaming table. Further, players and other casino customers wear a large variety of colors in their clothing, which clutters the visual background, making the optical marking difficult or impossible to read.
Magnetic marking also have a number of distinct drawbacks. For example, RFID technology has other distinct drawbacks. For example, these markings degrade during use for example due to excessive handling, and thus become difficult or impossible to read. Magnetic markings must be placed in very close proximity to the reader, which typically requires the swiping of the magnetic marking through a slot in the reader. This would unduly interfere with the playing of traditional card games.
RFID technology relies on a semiconductor chip coupled to an antenna. The cost of these RFID chips is rather high, currently on the order of $1.50-$2.50 per chip. Thus each set of 52 playing cards would cost between $78 and-$130, prohibitively expensive for practical use given the extremely large number of playing card sets each casino uses. While these RFID chips tend to be very thin, they are still rather large when compared with the thickness of a playing card. Thus it is difficult to incorporate an RFID chip in a playing card. For example, an RFID chip laminated in a playing card may be detectable as a lump or bump by players, causing the players to reject the playing cards and take their business to other casinos. The RFID chip may throw off the balance of the playing card, again causing players to chose other casinos. The increase in thickness in the playing card may interfere with existing casino systems, such as automatic shuffle devices.
It would be desirable to have a system and method that efficiently allows a casino to identify and/or monitor playing cards. Further, it would be desirable to have a common system and method that efficiently allows casinos to read both playing cards and wagers.
In one aspect, a playing card comprises: a face substrate having a face surface and an inner surface opposed to the face surface, the face surface of the face substrate bearing human-readable rank and suit markings; and a conductive material carried by the playing card, the conductive material defining a response profile to an electromagnetic interrogation that uniquely corresponds to at least the rank marking on the face surface of the face substrate.
In another aspect, a playing card comprises: a face substrate having a face surface and an inner surface opposed to the face surface, the face surface of the face substrate bearing human-readable rank and suit markings; a base substrate having a first surface and a second surface opposed to the first surface; and a conductive material disposed on at least one of the inner surface of the face substrate and the first surface of the base substrate to form at least a portion of a resident circuit, wherein the face substrate and the base substrate form a laminate structure having the inner surface of the face substrate facing the first surface of the base substrate to protectively envelope at least a portion of the conductive material.
In another aspect, a playing card, comprises: a face substrate having a face surface and an inner surface opposed to the face surface, the face surface of the face substrate bearing human-readable rank and suit markings; a base substrate having a first surface and a second surface opposed to the first surface; and a conductive material disposed on at least one of the surfaces of the base substrate to form at least a portion of a resident circuit, wherein the face substrate and the base substrate form a laminate structure having an inner surface of the face substrate facing the first surface of the base substrate to protectively envelope at least a portion of the conductive material. In yet another aspect, a playing card comprises: a face substrate having a face surface; a set of human-readable rank and suit markings printed on the face surface of the face substrate; and a plurality of conductive elements distributed within the human-readable rank and suit markings, the distribution of the conductive elements uniquely identifiable to at least a value of the rank marking.
In yet another aspect, a set of playing cards comprises: a plurality of playing cards, each playing card comprising: a face substrate having a face surface and an inner surface opposed to the face surface, the face surface of the face substrate bearing human-readable rank and suit markings; and a conductive material carried by the playing card and defining a response profile to electromagnetic interrogation that uniquely corresponds to at least the rank marking on the face surface of the face substrate of the respective playing card.
In even a further aspect, a playing card reader comprises: a housing having a receptacle sized to receive a plurality of playing cards; a transmitter received in the housing; a receiver received in the housing; and at least a first antenna electrically coupled to at least one of the transmitter and the receiver, the first antenna positioned to electromagnetically interrogate at least some of the playing cards.
In yet a further aspect, a system for wirelessly monitoring wagering and play of a playing card game at a gaming table using playing cards and wagering chips each bearing conductive material, comprises: a card reader having a wireless transmitter and receiver coupled to at least a first antenna to electromagnetically interrogate playing cards; a chip reader having at least one wireless transmitter and receiver coupled to a plurality of antennas positioned proximate to respective wagering placement areas to electromagnetically interrogate wagering chips placed at the wagering placement areas, if any; and a computing system coupled to receive data from both the wireless card reader and the wireless chip reader.
In an even further aspect, a method of automating a card game, comprises: wirelessly interrogating each of a plurality of playing cards using radio frequency transmissions; and for at least some of the playing cards, determining a rank of the playing card based on the wireless interrogation.
In yet a further aspect, a set of playing cards comprises: a first plurality of playing cards each having a value of 10, each playing card in the first plurality of playing cards comprising: a face substrate having a face surface and an inner surface opposed to the face surface, the face surface of the face substrate bearing human-readable rank and suit markings; and a conductive material carried by the playing card responsive to radio frequency interrogation; and a second plurality of playing cards each having a rank of ace, each playing card in the second plurality of playing cards comprising: a face substrate having a face surface and an inner surface opposed to the face surface, the face surface of the face substrate bearing human-readable rank and suit markings; and a conductive material carried by the playing card responsive to radio frequency interrogation, wherein the conductive material is positioned at a first location on each of the playing cards in the first plurality of playing cards and at a second location, different than the first location, on each of the playing cards of the second plurality of playing cards.
In yet a further aspect, a playing card reader comprises: means for radio frequency interrogating a playing card; and means for determining a position of a conductive material on the playing card in response to the radio frequency interrogation. In yet a further aspect, a method of identifying playing cards comprises: for each playing card, transmitting at least a first radio frequency interrogation signal; and receiving a radio frequency response from the playing cards; and determining a value of the playing card based on the received radio frequency response.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements and angles are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments of the invention. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the invention may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known structures associated with transmitters, receivers, transceivers, antennas, and computing systems, have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments of the invention.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
The headings provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the claimed invention.
The number, placement and/or size of the conductive material may be selected based on the rank and/or suit of the playing card 10, to uniquely encode identifying information for the particular rank and/or suit. Additionally, or alternatively, these same parameters can be selected to encode identifying information such as a serial number (numeric, alpha, alpha-numeric or otherwise), to unique identify the playing card 10 with respect to any other playing card used in the casino (e.g., unique with respect to hundreds or thousands of decks of playing cards).
In contrast to the embodiment of
An automated wireless system 70 may wirelessly monitor playing cards and/or chips. The system 70 includes a computing system 72 controllingly coupled to a transmitter 74 and receiver 76. In some embodiments, the transmitter 74 and receiver 76 may be formed as a single transceiver. The transmitter is coupled to one or more antennas 78, and the receiver is coupled to one or more antennas 80. For example, the transmitter 74 may be coupled to an antenna 78 positioned in or on the gaming table 52. The receiver 76 may be coupled to an antenna 80 positioned in, or on, the gaming table 52. The antennas 78, 80 may be positioned at a central location, or respective antennas 78, 80 may be positioned proximate each of the bet circles 58, respectively. Antennas 78, 80 may also be positioned in the card shoe 64, chip tray 66, and/or discard shoe 68. The system 70 may include a wedge or similar device between the computing system 72 and the transmitter 74 and/or receiver 76 for converting RF signals into data suitable for processing by the computing system 72 (e.g., converting RF signals into formatted ASCII data).
In step 208, the computing system 72 and/or wedge 82 processes the received response. In optional step 210, the computing system 72 decrypts the received response. In optional step 212, the computing system 72 decodes the received and/or decrypted response. In step 214 the computing system 72 stores the response. In step 216, the computing system 72 determines whether a timeout has been exceeded. If a timeout has not been exceeded, the method 200 returns control to step 206. If the timeout has been exceeded, the computing system 72 determines the wager amount in step 228. Control may then return to step 204 to identify further wagers.
The methods 100, 200 may employ polling or other techniques common in the RIFD arts for identifying individual playing cards 10 and/or chips 60 from groups of playing cards and/or chips.
In step 304, the computing system 72 determines the number and size of the wagers. The computing system 72 may employ one or more transmitters 74 and antennas 78 as well as receivers 76 and antennas 80 positioned at or proximate the bet circles 58.
In step 308, the computing system 72 determines the outcome of a wager. The computing system 72 may employ one or more transmitters 74 and antennas 78 as well as receivers 76 and antennas 80 positioned in or proximate the card shoe 64, discard shoe 68 and/or player positions. Thus, the computing system 72 relies on the received responses to identify the values of the playing cards 10 and thus the value of the hands held by the players 56 and dealer 54, and compares these values to determine outcomes. The computing system 72 may further employ a defined set of odds to determine the value of the payouts.
In step 310, the computing system 72 determines the contents of the bank or chip tray 66 in a similar fashion to that described in step 302. In step 312, the computing system 72 validates the takes and payouts by comparing the contents of the chip tray 66 determined in step 310 with that determined in step 302. Discrepancies can be identified and appropriate notifications provided.
In step 406, the computing system 72 determines the number of players 56 in the game. For example, the computing 72 may employ one or more transmitters 74 and antennas 78 and one or more receivers 76 and antennas 80 to detect chips 60 at various bet circles 58. The number of bet circles 58 having chips 60 indicates the number of players 56. In optional step 408, the computing system 72 determines whether the dealer 54 has blackjack. Blackjack is defined as the dealer 54 having an initial hand of two playing cards 10 with a total value equal to twenty-one. The computing system 72 may employ one or more transmitters 74 and antennas 78, as well as one or more receivers 76 and antennas 80 positioned at or proximate the dealer 64 to interrogate the dealer's cards. In this respect the computing system 72 may alternatively employ the knowledge of the original sequence and the number of players 56 to determine the value of the dealer's hand.
In optional step 410, the computing system 72 interrogates the dealer's initial hand employing one or more transmitters 74 and antennas 78 as well as one or more receivers 76 and antennas 80 positioned proximate the dealer 54. In optional step 412, the computing system 72 verifies the deal and/or sequence of playing cards using an knowledge of the original sequence and the identify of the cards forming the dealer's initial hand learned from step 410.
In step 414, the computing system 72 may optionally determine an ending sequence for the playing cards. The computing system 72 may employ one or more transmitters 74 and antennas 78 as well as one or more receivers 76 and antennas 80 positioned in or proximate the discard holder 68.
In step 416, the computing system 72 determines the player's final hands. The computing system 72 may rely on a knowledge of the original sequence, the number of players 56 and the dealer's initial hand to determine the player's final hands. Additionally, or alternatively, the computing system 72 may rely on the knowledge of the ending sequence. In step 418, the computing system 72 determines the dealer's final hand. In step 420, the computing system 72 compares the value of the player's final hand with the value of the dealer's final hand for each of the players. The method terminates at step 422.
a card shoe 64 including a plurality of playing cards84 and a block of weight 86 for urging the playing cards 84 towards a slot 88. A portion 90 of the card shoe 64 may be formed of a radio frequency impervious, resistant or absorbent material, thereby forming an RF barrier. One or more antennas 78, 80 may be positioned to electro-magnetically interrogate a number of the playing cards in the receptacle simultaneously.
Although specific embodiments of and examples for the wireless monitoring system and methods are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as will be recognized by those skilled in the relevant art. The teachings provided herein can be applied to other wireless monitoring systems, not necessarily the exemplary blackjack wireless monitoring system described above.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the above U.S. patents, patent applications and publications referred to in this specification are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety, including but not limited to U.S. Pat. No. 6,460,848, filed Dec. 30, 1999, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING CASINOS AND GAMING”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/849,456, filed May 4, 2001, entitled “METHOD, APPARATUS AND ARTICLE FOR VERIFYING CARD GAMES, SUCH AS BLACKJACK”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/790,480, filed Feb. 21, 2001, entitled “METHOD, APPARATUS AND ARTICLE FOR EVALUATING CARD GAMES, SUCH AS BLACKJACK”. Aspects of the invention can be modified, if necessary, to employ systems, circuits and concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments of the invention.
The system may employ a transceiver rather than separate transmitter and receivers, and may employ common antennas. The methods may include additional steps, eliminate steps, and perform the steps in different orders. The playing cards can include additional layers, including protective coatings. These and other changes can be made to the invention in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all wireless monitoring systems to track playing cards and/or wagers. Accordingly, the invention is not limited by the disclosure, but instead its scope is to be determined entirely by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1034402 | Hardy | Jul 1912 | A |
1727800 | Albert | Sep 1929 | A |
1890504 | Ferguson, Jr. | Dec 1932 | A |
2663418 | Grunwald | Dec 1953 | A |
2694662 | Hunter, Jr. | Nov 1954 | A |
3222071 | Lang | Dec 1965 | A |
3377070 | Nottoli | Apr 1968 | A |
3493728 | Braden, Jr. et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3561756 | Barnett | Feb 1971 | A |
3667759 | Barr | Jun 1972 | A |
3690670 | Cassady et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3740742 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3751041 | Seifert | Aug 1973 | A |
3752962 | Greskovics | Aug 1973 | A |
3766452 | Burpee et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3810172 | Burpee et al. | May 1974 | A |
3814436 | Boren | Jun 1974 | A |
4023167 | Wahlstrom | May 1977 | A |
4244582 | Raees et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4373726 | Churchill et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4377285 | Kadlic | Mar 1983 | A |
4510490 | Anderson, III et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4531117 | Nourse et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4531187 | Uhland | Jul 1985 | A |
4534562 | Cuff et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4636846 | Villareal | Jan 1987 | A |
4656463 | Anders et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4660025 | Humphrey | Apr 1987 | A |
4662637 | Pfeiffer | May 1987 | A |
4667959 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 1987 | A |
4693480 | Smith | Sep 1987 | A |
4725079 | Koza et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4728108 | Neuwahl | Mar 1988 | A |
4746830 | Holland | May 1988 | A |
4750743 | Nicoletti | Jun 1988 | A |
4814589 | Storch et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817528 | Baker | Apr 1989 | A |
4822050 | Normand et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4832341 | Muller et al. | May 1989 | A |
4859991 | Watkins et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870391 | Cooper | Sep 1989 | A |
4885700 | Kondziolka et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4920335 | Andrews | Apr 1990 | A |
4926996 | Eglise et al. | May 1990 | A |
4951950 | Normand et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5039102 | Miller | Aug 1991 | A |
5053612 | Pielemeier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067713 | Soules et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5103234 | Watkins et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110134 | Laughlin et al. | May 1992 | A |
5166502 | Rendleman et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5186464 | Lamle | Feb 1993 | A |
5199710 | Lamle | Apr 1993 | A |
5224712 | Laughlin et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259907 | Soules et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5283422 | Storch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5312104 | Miller | May 1994 | A |
5361885 | Modler | Nov 1994 | A |
5362053 | Miller | Nov 1994 | A |
5374061 | Albrecht | Dec 1994 | A |
5397133 | Penzias | Mar 1995 | A |
5406264 | Plonsky et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416308 | Hood et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417431 | Gluck | May 1995 | A |
5431399 | Kelley | Jul 1995 | A |
5518249 | Sines et al. | May 1996 | A |
5538803 | Gambino et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5557280 | Marsh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581257 | Greene et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605334 | McCrea, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613680 | Groves et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625341 | Giles et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632483 | Garczynski et al. | May 1997 | A |
5651548 | French et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654050 | Whalen-Shaw | Aug 1997 | A |
5669816 | Garczynski et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676376 | Valley | Oct 1997 | A |
5681039 | Miller | Oct 1997 | A |
5698839 | Jagielinski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699066 | Marsh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707287 | McCrea, Jr. | Jan 1998 | A |
5722893 | Hill et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735525 | McCrea, Jr. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735742 | French | Apr 1998 | A |
5742656 | Mikulak et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754110 | Appalucci et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755618 | Mothwurf | May 1998 | A |
5757876 | Dam et al. | May 1998 | A |
5770533 | Franchi | Jun 1998 | A |
5772505 | Garczynski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779546 | Meissner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791988 | Nomi | Aug 1998 | A |
5803808 | Strisower | Sep 1998 | A |
5812065 | Schrott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831532 | Gambino et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5831669 | Adrain | Nov 1998 | A |
5847650 | Zhou et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871400 | Yfantis | Feb 1999 | A |
5895048 | Smith, Jr. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895321 | Gassies et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911626 | McCrea, Jr. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919090 | Mothwurf | Jul 1999 | A |
5941769 | Order | Aug 1999 | A |
5945654 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5949050 | Fosbenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954654 | Eaton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5989122 | Roblejo | Nov 1999 | A |
6003013 | Boushy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021949 | Boiron | Feb 2000 | A |
6029891 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039650 | Hill | Mar 2000 | A |
6042150 | Daley | Mar 2000 | A |
6093103 | McCrea, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6117012 | McCrea, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126166 | Lorson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145838 | White | Nov 2000 | A |
6149154 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165069 | Sines et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166763 | Rhodes et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6186895 | Oliver | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193607 | Kay | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196547 | Pascal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217447 | Lofink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250632 | Albrecht | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254096 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254484 | McCrea, Jr. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264109 | Chapet et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267248 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267671 | Hogan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6293864 | Romero | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299534 | Breeding et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299536 | Hill | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307473 | Zampini et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313871 | Schubert | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346044 | McCrea, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357746 | Sadowski | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361044 | Block et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402142 | Warren et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403908 | Stardust et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6409595 | Uihlein et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425817 | Momemy | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446864 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457715 | Friedman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460848 | Soltys et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464584 | Oliver | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6486655 | Crossfield | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497408 | Walker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502116 | Kelly et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508709 | Karmarkar | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514140 | Storch | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517435 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517436 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520857 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527271 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530836 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530837 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533276 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533662 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533664 | Crumby | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561897 | Bourbour et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568678 | Breeding et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6579180 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579181 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581747 | Charlier et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582301 | Hill | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588750 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6588751 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595857 | Soltys et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6629591 | Griswold et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6629889 | Mothwurf | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638161 | Soltys et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6651981 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651982 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652379 | Soltys et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655684 | Grauzer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659875 | Purton | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663490 | Soltys et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676127 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685564 | Oliver | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685568 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6688979 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712696 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726205 | Purton | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728740 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729956 | Wolf et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6729961 | Millerschone | May 2004 | B1 |
6735183 | O'Toole et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6758751 | Soltys et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6812824 | Goldinger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6889979 | Blaha et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6925701 | Eckstein et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947513 | O'Toole et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955599 | Bourbour et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970141 | Copeland et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7009496 | Arneson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011309 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028910 | Reignoux et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029009 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040139 | Sunshine | May 2006 | B2 |
7073791 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077332 | Verschuur et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7137627 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7255344 | Grauzer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020063389 | Breeding et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111210 | Luciano, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020147042 | Vuong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163125 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187821 | Soltys et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032474 | Kaminkow | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036425 | Kaminkow et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054878 | Benoy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064774 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030064798 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073479 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073498 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030104856 | Wolf | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030173737 | Soltys et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176209 | Soltys et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195037 | Vuong et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040067789 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100026 | Haggard | May 2004 | A1 |
20040108255 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111338 | Bandy et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127277 | Walker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147327 | Soltys et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040207156 | Soltys et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219982 | Khoo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224777 | Smith et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229682 | Gelinotte | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050012270 | Schubert et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050026680 | Gururajan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026681 | Grauzer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026682 | Grauzer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027604 | Bandy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050051955 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051965 | Gururajan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054408 | Steil et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062226 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062227 | Grauzer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073102 | Yoseloff et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101367 | Soltys et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116020 | Smolucha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121852 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137005 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156318 | Douglas | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164761 | Tain | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050183264 | Eckstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050200483 | Eckstein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227760 | Vlazny et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266919 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288083 | Downs, III | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288084 | Schubert | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288085 | Schubert et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001217 | Soltys et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019745 | Benbrahim | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 39 502 | Sep 1995 | DE |
197 48 930 | May 1998 | DE |
0 327 069 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 790 848 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1 291 045 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2 775 196 | Aug 1999 | FR |
2 246 520 | Feb 1992 | GB |
2 370 791 | Jul 2002 | GB |
2 380 143 | Apr 2003 | GB |
WO 9603188 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 9636253 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9943403 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0022585 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0205914 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02051512 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03004116 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2006039308 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040207156 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60463978 | Apr 2003 | US |