Patent Application
20200205204
None
The subject matter of this application relates to wireless networks and more particularly to systems and methods that improve throughput of wireless network data.
A wireless local area network (WLAN) typically includes one or more access points (APs) that provide shared wireless communication channels for use by a number of client devices or stations (STAs), along with at least one gateway, which may for example be a router or any other device capable of transmitting and receiving signals to/from the respective APs and relaying signals to and from a wired network.
Most wireless networks are configured to operate on the 2.4 or 5.0 GHz frequency bands—e.g., IEEE 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11ac—and utilize omnidirectional antenna arrays to establish communications channels that can readily move around obstructions between linked network devices, such as walls, furniture, cubicles, etc. Even where signals between devices in the network (e.g., between an STA and an AP) are impeded or otherwise degraded by such obstructions, adequate bandwidth can be restored through the use of repeaters and/or extenders throughout the wireless network.
Unlike the wireless network standards described above, 802.11ad operates on a much higher frequency band—i.e., frequencies between 57 and 66 GHz. The advantage of such high frequencies is that much more data can be transmitted, easily enabling 4K video streams to be transmitted wirelessly for example. However, signals transmitted at such high frequencies do not propagate over as large a distance as wireless signals at lower frequencies.
What is desired, therefore, are systems and methods that increase the range of wireless signals transmitted over frequencies as high as 66 GHz.
In a first embodiment of the disclosure, an arrangement configured to establish a wireless network may comprise an access point and a client device. The access point may have a first directional antenna configured to transmit at a frequency between approximately 55 GHz and 65 GHz. The client device may have a second directional antenna configured to receive signals from the access point at a frequency between approximately 55 GHz and 65 GHz. The first directional antenna may be aimed in a direction substantially not toward the second directional antenna, and the second directional antenna may be aimed in a direction substantially not toward the first directional antenna.
In the context of the first embodiment, the phrase “aimed in a direction” refers to the direction along which the directional antenna is oriented to transmit signals, or receive signals, or both. Also, in the context of the first embodiment, the phrase “aimed in a direction not substantially toward” an antenna of the other device means that the antenna is aimed in a direction such that any signal propagating around a linear axis continuously along that direction would not be communicated to or from the other antenna without significant signal degradation.
A second embodiment of the disclosure may comprise a method for establishing a wireless communications network for exchanging signals between an access point having a first directional antenna and a client device having a second directional antenna. The method may include the steps of aiming the first directional antenna in a direction substantially not toward the second directional antenna, and aiming the second directional antenna in a direction substantially not toward the first directional antenna; where the client device receives a signal propagated from the access point.
In the context of the second embodiment, the phrase “aimed in a direction” refers to the direction along which the directional antenna is oriented to transmit signals, or receive signals, or both. Also, in the context of the first embodiment, the phrase “aimed in a direction not substantially toward” an antenna of the other device means that the antenna is aimed in a direction such that any signal propagating around a linear axis continuously along that direction would not be communicated to or from the other antenna without significant signal degradation.
For a better understanding of the invention, and to show how the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As noted earlier, wireless propagation loss is a significant disadvantage when transmitting wireless signals at frequencies in the range of 60 GHz. Wireless propagation loss for 60 GHz signals can, in turn, be subdivided into three types of losses: (a) 60 GHz free space path loss; (b) propagation through building materials; and (c) losses due to resonance with oxygen. First, as a signal radiates away from an antenna, it will lose energy as the EM wave scatters away from the antenna. This “free space path loss,” denoted by Lfs, will be the dominant factor in the loss of signal energy as the transmitted signal moves away from the antenna:
L
fs=(λ/4πD)2=(c/4πfD)2 Eqn (1)
where D is distance in meters, f is frequency in Hertz, λ is wavelength in meters, and c is the speed of light in free space. If respective antenna gains for the transmitter and receiver are considered, equation (1) can be expressed in logarithmic form as
L
fs=20 Log 10(D)+20 Log 10(f)+20 Log 10(4π/c)−Gt−Gr Eqn (2)
From this equation, there is an additional 20 dB loss in signal strength merely due to the use of a 60 GHz transmission channel relative to a 5.5 GHz channel.
With respect to propagation losses through building materials when using a 60 GHz transmission channel, the following chart shows several loss-related properties for different materials:
Attenuation through these materials will affect the link budget within the network depending upon the configuration of walls and other items.
The third category of free space losses is the resonance with oxygen at 60 GHz propagation frequencies.
One technique of mitigating free space losses in 802.11ad wireless networks is to increase antenna gain and use directional antennas, aimed between network components, to focus signal power along a narrow path to overcome the free space losses described above. The present inventors conducted a variety of 802.11ad wireless network field tests to determine the efficiency of using high-gain directional antennas to communicate in an 802.11ad wireless network. For these tests, the inventors used two 802.11ac Qualcomm units modified to operate at 60 GHz, but equipped with 802.11ad array antennas. Each unit included a Linux installation that could perform independent iperf measurements. The UDP iperf test performed substandard compared to the TCP test so TCP was used. The maximum data rate measured from unit to unit was 1.2 Gbps; although the inventors noted that this was far short of the theoretical limitation of 4.6 Gbps for 802.11ad, the performance appeared caused by a bottleneck and per Qualcomm, the 1.2 Gbps data rate ceiling was to be expected.
A field test of a 60 GHz wireless network was first performed in an office environment architecture with upstairs and downstairs floor plans shown in
The results of the upstairs testing are generally shown in
The results of the downstairs testing are generally shown in
Placing the AP in the location of the bookshelf by the fireplace presented many challenges. The AP was in a solid oak bookshelf next to a fireplace insert made of metal. Also, Bedroom #2 was being used for storage, with many boxes, small appliances, and another wood bookshelf for the signal to pass through to reach to the upper right corner of the house. With respect to the STA placements in the upper left corner of the house, the signal had to pass through a pantry, hallway and bathroom where the path through bathroom also took the signal into the shower, which has highly reflective surfaces. There was also a metal weight bench in the path between the AP and the STA about 3 feet before the closet in the Master Bedroom and at the same height as the Client was placed in the upper left corner of the room in the closet.
These conditions had a large effect on the link as can be seen by the performance metrics shown in
Interestingly, to achieve connectivity and throughput in the upper right corner of the house, which achieved a maximum of approximately 250 Mbps when the directional antennas of the units were directly aligned towards each other, the inventors considered that it might be possible to route the directional signal between the antennas of the AP 22 and STA 24 around obstacles by pointing both antennas toward a mirror that was hanging on the Master Bedroom entryway wall. Through experimentation, when the AP 22 was kept at the same height and just pointed towards the mirror (through the pantry walls), the STA 24 had to be raised to a height of about 4.5 feet to get into the signal path created by the reflected signal; once the STA 24 was in that raised position, the rates went from about 144 Mbps in the laundry room to the 1.2 Gbps maximum rates these units are capable of. Moreover, where no association was previously achieved between the AP 22 and STA 24 in the water closet of the bathroom in Bedroom #2, about 848 Mbps was obtained through the signal reflected by the mirror. All rates at the locations where the signal was not passing through either the Master Bedroom bath or the storage in Bedroom #2 were at the maximum rates achievable by these units of about 1.2 Gbps.
To further study the efficacy of using mirrors or other reflectors to aim directional 802.11ad wireless signals, further field tests were conducted in an office environment.
As in previous tests, one Qualcomm unit was configured as an Access Point (AP) and the other unit configured as an STA 34. The AP 32 was placed at the far end of one of two intersecting hallways, about 100 linear feet away from the STA 34 which was positioned in a conference room at the end of the other hallway, with many obstructions between the two. Due to these obstructions, no association between the AP 32 and the STA 34 was expected, and indeed it was verified that no association could be obtained when the directional antennas of both units were pointed toward each other.
Three mirrors 36, 38, and 40 of different shapes and sizes were chosen for this test. Although a link could have been completed using only one mirror, three mirrors were used to maximize the distance of the signal path, and to see if multiple mirrors would degrade the signal as it travelled between the AP 32 and STA 34. Mirror 36 was a full-length mirror measuring 50″×14″ and was located 88 feet from the AP 32. Mirror 38 was an irregularly-shaped wall-mounted mirror with right angles and rounded sides, which measured 15″×15″ and was positioned 52 feet from Mirror 36. Mirror 40 was a wall-mounted mirror with bevelled edges and measuring 21.5″×25.5″ and was positioned 19 feet away from mirror 38 in the reverse direction mirror 36. Mirror 40 was 38 feet away from the STA 34. A laser pointer was taped to the top of the AP 32, and used to arrange and orient the mirrors so that the directional wireless 802.11ad signal would navigate the total path length of 197 feet between the AP 32 and the STA 34.
With the above configuration, the STA 34 was now able to see the AP 32 and associate. Iperf was used to pass traffic downstream, and the maximum rates that these units were capable of (about 1.2 Gbps) was achieved. To verify that the mirrored link was indeed the path the signal was taking, mirror 36 was removed from the link. At that point the association between the AP 32 and STA was lost. When mirror 36 was replaced and realigned, the AP 32 and STA 34 re-associated and began passing the maximum rates again. This procedure was also done with mirrors 38 and 40, which produced the same results.
Another field test in an office environment was performed to determine the effectiveness of diffuse surfaces in redirecting 802.11ad wireless signals. Specifically, referring to
For the diffuse reflecting surface, a spare ceiling tile was used that measures 24″×48″ and was made from porous mineral fiber material. The ceiling tile was placed in the corner that both of the 802.11ad units were pointing to, and both the front and back surfaces of the tile were tested for their reflecting ability. First the front of the ceiling tile was used as the reflecting surface then the back. As noted above, before the ceiling tile was put in place, the throughput between the AP 32 and the STA 34 was only about 285 Mbps. Once the tile was in place, the throughput rates jumped up to the maximum that these units are capable of, i.e., about 1.2 Gbps. Once the ceiling tile was removed, the rates dropped back to 285 Mbps and as soon as it was replaced, the throughput rate climbed back up to the maximum rate. This behavior was seen on both the front and back of the ceiling tile. Having few porous surfaces available, other random surfaces were tried, including a framed picture that was hanging on the wall and the front and back of a white board. All of them gave us the same identical results.
It will be appreciated that the invention is not restricted to the particular embodiment that has been described, and that variations may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, as interpreted in accordance with principles of prevailing law, including the doctrine of equivalents or any other principle that enlarges the enforceable scope of a claim beyond its literal scope. Unless the context indicates otherwise, a reference in a claim to the number of instances of an element, be it a reference to one instance or more than one instance, requires at least the stated number of instances of the element but is not intended to exclude from the scope of the claim a structure or method having more instances of that element than stated. The word “comprise” or a derivative thereof, when used in a claim, is used in a nonexclusive sense that is not intended to exclude the presence of other elements or steps in a claimed structure or method.
