Wireless reservoir production control

Abstract
A reservoir production control system includes a plurality of wells for producing a reservoir linked to a central computer over a downhole communication network and a surface communication network. Both the downhole and the surface communication networks are wireless communications paths for transmitting downhole data and surface data to the central computer. Both networks include a series of interconnected tubing or pipe that allows transmission of data over electrically isolated portions of the pipe and tubing. After integrating and analyzing all relevant data and comparing the data with a reservoir model, the central computer initiates changes in a plurality of downhole control devices associated with the wells, thereby optimizing the production of the reservoir.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates in general to reservoir optimization and more specifically to petroleum wells having downhole independently addressable wireless measurement and control devices that communicate with surface power and telemetry devices such that production from individual zones within individual wells may be coordinated to optimize overall reservoir production.


2. Description of Related Art


Oil and gas reservoirs are extensive three-dimensional subsurface geological structures whose fluid contents are produced through arrays of wells which withdraw fluids from the reservoir only at points where the wells pass through the producing zones. As fluids are withdrawn at the wells, pressure differentials develop within the reservoir which in turn create displacement of fluids from more distant reservoir regions towards the producing wells. To assist in sweeping desired fluids towards the producing wells, it is common practice in some fields to pump water or other fluids into wells which are designated injection wells.


To assist in comprehending the changing condition of the reservoir and thus manage production from individual wells to optimize recovery from the field overall, it is common practice to develop a reservoir model which reflects the relevant characteristics of the formation's fixed matrix such as porosity and permeability, and the composition, pressure, and temperature of the fluids contained within that matrix. The parameters of both the matrix and the fluids are expected to change as fluids are withdrawn from the producing wells and injection fluids are introduced at the injection wells. Since the geological formations of the reservoir are generally heterogeneous, the starting values of the matrix and fluid parameters are spatial variables, and as production evolves the changes in these parameters are also spatially variable in addition to being time dependent.


The data used to generate a reservoir model come from many sources. Three-dimensional seismic surveys provide stratigraphy and faulting, and wireline logging, existing well production histories provide, and to a lesser extent seismic surveys, provide data on formation fluids.


The starting values of the reservoir model parameters adjacent to each well can be measured relatively easily using wireline logging tools before each well is cased, but once production has commenced the presence of the well casing prevents many of the measurements which can be made in an open hole. Even measurements which could be made through the casing are usually not performed in existing practice since doing so would require either removing the production hardware and tubing from the well and running cased hole wireline logs, or the use of permanent downhole sensors connected to surface equipment by cables which extend the full depth of the well. These cables are expensive, are not entirely reliable, often introduce operational problems, and their installation at the time of completion complicates that process. The same issue of requiring cables to operate downhole control equipment such as valves also discourages the use of such devices. When downhole control devices are absolutely required, the provision of permanently installed cables can be avoided by using slickline tools, but cost prevents these from altering the settings of downhole devices at frequent intervals.


All references cited herein are incorporated by reference to the maximum extent allowable by law. To the extent a reference may not be fully incorporated herein, it is incorporated by reference for background purposes and indicative of the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The difficulties inherent with restricted measurement and control are largely resolved by methods in accordance with the present invention. Wireless power and communications as described in the Related Applications enable the wells to provide real-time measurement of downhole conditions to update the reservoir model, and based on predictions made from the model, the well production is controlled to optimize field performance. The objective function for production optimization may be altered over time as product market conditions shift, production costs vary, or physical plant capabilities are changed.


The invention and development of wireless communication and electrical power transmission and control by means of pipes and tubing introduces the opportunity for widespread collection of oil field data, both (1) at the surface, through the network of facilities piping and injection and production distribution lines, and (2) in the subsurface, through well casing and tubing. The amounts and types of data that could be collected and the degree of control in remote parts of the units would provide a major advance in management of single wells, whole fields, or even company-wide assets.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a reservoir production control system according to the present invention being implemented on a company-wide basis to optimize the production of a plurality of reservoirs.



FIG. 2 depicts secondary production operations in a multi-layer reservoir being produced by two wells.



FIG. 3 illustrates primary production operations in a multi-layer reservoir by a production well, the production well experiencing water or gas breakthrough in one layer of the reservoir before another layer is oil depleted.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the measurement, modeling, and control actions method for closed-loop control of an individual well or a field.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring to FIG. 1 in the drawings, a reservoir production control system 11 according to the present invention is illustrated. Reservoir production control system 11 is used to optimize the production of one or more reservoirs. A reservoir 13 includes a plurality of wells 15, 17, 19, 21 completed in the subsurface for producing oil and gas reserves from reservoir 13. The exact number and type of wells present in a particular reservoir could vary significantly from reservoir to reservoir. In FIG. 1, well 15 is an injection well, well 17 is a conventional production well, well 19 is a multi-lateral production well, and well 21 is a data observation well. Each well includes a borehole that begins at a surface of the well and continues into a production zone within the reservoir. Preferably, the wells include casing that is cemented in the borehole during completion of the well. A tubing string or production tubing 29 is located in the borehole of each well.


Wireless data receptors or downhole data pods 31 are distributed in the boreholes of the wells. Downhole data pods 31 send and receive data along a downhole communication network 33. Preferably, the downhole communication network allows transmission of data signals along an electrically isolated portion of the tubing string. In most cases, the electrically isolated portion of the tubing string is created between two ferromagnetic chokes placed on the tubing string. The transmission of data using such electrically isolated sections of pipe or tubing is described more fully in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/177,999, entitled “Toroidal Choke Inductor for Wireless Communication and Control,” filed Jan. 24, 2000, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/178,000, entitled “Ferromagnetic Choke in Wellhead,” filed Jan. 24, 2000, which are both hereby incorporated by reference. Pods 31 may also be equipped to collect data about downhole physical characteristics of the well, including pressure, temperature, acoustic noise, seismic signals, resistivity, fluid turbidity, infrared response, flow rate in the pipe, vibration, or other measurements useful for monitoring the well. This data collection would be accomplished in the manner described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/177,998, entitled “Petroleum Well Having Downhole Sensors, Communication, and Power,” filed Jan. 24, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Collected data would be transmitted to the surface of the well over the downhole communication network 33 using the methods described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/177,999, entitled “Toroidal Choke Inductor for Wireless Communication and Control,” filed Jan. 24, 2000, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/178,000, entitled “Ferromagnetic Choke in Wellhead,” filed Jan. 24, 2000. In some cases pod 31 would be equipped to operate accompanying downhole control devices 35, which could include a submersible pump or a controllable gas-lift valve for modifying the flow rate of oil within the production tubing 29. The downhole control device 35 could also include a chemical injector for injecting treatment chemicals such as corrosion inhibitors, scale inhibitor, foaming agents and paraffin solvents. The operation of downhole valves using the power transmission and communication techniques described above is more fully described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/178,001, entitled “Controllable Gas-Lift Well and Valve,” filed Jan. 24, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Detection of failures of downhole equipment, such as gas-lift valve leakage, electric submersible pump vibration, and rod pump noise, would allow early remedial efforts that would improve productivity of the wells.


In addition to placement of wireless devices in the subsurface portions of the wells, a plurality of surface data pods 37 may be placed in a surface communication network 38 of interconnected pipes 39. The interconnected pipes 39 are common in oil field operations and are generally used to fluidly connect the wells to tanks and separators 41. Each of the interconnected pipes is also a potential data transmission path when a section of the pipes can be electrically isolated as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/177,999, entitled “Toroidal Choke Inductor for Wireless Communication and Control,” filed Jan. 24, 2000, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/178,000, entitled “Ferromagnetic Choke in Wellhead,” filed Jan. 24, 2000. Preferably, the electrically isolated portions of the interconnected pipes are located between ferromagnetic chokes placed on the pipes. The wireless devices at the surface would interact with the subsurface devices to optimize well production in view of any operational constraints at the surface. These constraints might be (1) available gas for gas lift, (2) supply of water or other fluids for flooding projects, (3) upsets in production facilities such as oil/water separation, (4) emulsion control, and (5) other common occurrences encountered in manual operations.


Control of all of the operations described above resides in a central data collection computer 51, which will have a reservoir model with which to compare the actual behavior of the reservoir being monitored by downhole data pods 31. Reservoir conditions that change with time are often unattainable after wells have been completed and pipe cemented in place. With permanent pressure monitors available for timely pressure transient analyses, the progress of depletion of a reservoir can be closely monitored. Deviations from expected behavior, can be analyzed and in some cases, such as poor profile control, may be corrected by the downhole control devices 35, or by well workovers.


Permanently installed resistivity monitors in producing wells would be effective in observing the effects of poor injection profiles. Referring to FIG. 2 in the drawings, a multi-layer reservoir 61 with production well 63 and an injection well 65 is illustrated during flooding operations of secondary production. Downhole sensing and control devices are used to regulate injection into individual layers, in order to prevent early breakthrough of injected fluids and to minimize wasteful cycling of injectants during sweepout of the other layers. This is accomplished by monitoring and controlling flow rates at a number of locations along the injection interval. Alternatively, layers that flood out prematurely can be detected by salinity devices or other detectors spaced along the interval in production well 63.


Referring to FIG. 3 in the drawings, a multi-layer reservoir 71 being produced by a production well 73 is illustrated during primary production. Well 73 is experiencing water or gas breakthrough in one layer of the reservoir before another layer of the reservoir is depleted of oil. By placing downhole equipment and downhole control devices in the layers experiencing water or gas breakthrough, production from these layers can be excluded, thereby permitting continued oil production from layers that are relatively free of gas or water.


The values of downhole data are compared with the reservoir model prediction to determine if the reservoir is operating as expected. When the reservoir operating parameters diverge from expected behavior, new wells may be required, or wells may need to be shut in or abandoned; however, many corrective operations are potentially attainable with the proposed downhole control devices.



FIG. 4 illustrates a measurement and control sequence appropriate to such corrective actions. As illustrated in FIG. 4, such a sequence is cyclic:

    • Measurements from downhole and surface sensors are collected and passed to the model;
    • The model may be updated from an external data source, for instance to alter desired production rate, and the measurements are compared to the model;
    • Based on the results of the comparison, decisions are taken on any action which may be required, and the model parameters are updated;
    • Any decisions for action are translated into commands which are transmitted to downhole actuators, and the cycle returns to the measurement step.


Reservoir management is not limited to optimization of a single field. Referring again to FIG. 1, a second central computer 77 and a third central computer 79 are associated with a second reservoir and a third reservoir, respectively. Similar to central computer 51, the second and third central computers 77, 79 monitor downhole data and surface data over individual downhole communication networks (not shown) and individual surface communication networks (not shown). The data collected by second central computer 77 and third central computer 79 are integrated with that data collected by central computer 51 over a remote communication network 91. The integration of data among the central computers 51, 77, 79 could include data for all of the fields operated by a particular company. This data can then be integrated and analyzed in conjunction with economic data 93 and world-wide economic trends, such as oil prices and supplies, national production controls, pipeline and tanker capacities, and location storage limitations. The overall effect of having large amounts of information and control in a central location by efficient wireless devices would allow effective optimization of production from all of a company's assets.

Claims
  • 1. A reservoir production control system comprising: a plurality of wells disposed on a reservoir, each well having a borehole and at least one piping structure located within the borehole;a central computer for collecting downhole data from one or more wells;a downhole communication network associated with one or more wells, the downhole communication comprising electrically isolated portions of the piping structure defined by electrical chokes;a surface communication network comprising a plurality of interconnected pipes located between the downhole communication network and the central computer for communicating information between the downhole communication network and the central computer;wherein the central computer receives downhole data via the downhole communication network and the surface communication network; andwherein communication occurs between the downhole communication network and the central computer by passing communication signals along electrically isolated sections of the interconnected pipes.
  • 2. The production control system according to claim 1, wherein: the downhole data collected from the wells is compared to a reservoir model; andwherein a selected well of the plurality of wells is adjusted to optimize production of the reservoir.
  • 3. The production control system according to claim 1, wherein the surface communication network includes wiring that electrically connects the downhole communication network to the central computer.
  • 4. The production control system according to claim 1 wherein the electrically isolated sections of interconnected pipe are created by placing ferromagnetic chokes at selected locations along the pipe, the ferromagnetic chokes circumferentially surrounding the pipe and impeding current flow through the pipe.
  • 5. The production control system according to claim 1, wherein communication and power transmission within the downhole communication network occurs along an electrically isolated section of the tubing string.
  • 6. The production control system according to claim 5, wherein the electrically isolated section of the tubing string is located between a first and a second ferromagnetic choke disposed circumferentially around the tubing string, both ferromagnetic chokes impeding current flow along the tubing string.
  • 7. The production control system according to claim 1, further comprising: a second central computer for collecting downhole data from a second reservoir;wherein the second central computer is electrically connected to the first central computer via a remote communication network; andwherein the downhole data collected by the first and second central computers is analyzed and used to collectively optimize the production of the first and second reservoir.
  • 8. A reservoir production control system comprising: a plurality of wells for producing a reservoir, each well having a borehole extending from the surface, and at least one piping structure located within the borehole;at least one downhole data pod located within the borehole of one of the wells for monitoring downhole data about downhole physical characteristics of the well;at least one surface data pod for monitoring surface data;a central computer for collecting the surface data from the surface data pod and the downhole data from the downhole data pod;a downhole communication network for transmitting alternating current electrical power and communication signals along an electrically isolated portion of the piping structure of the one or more wells from the downhole data pod to the surface of the one or more wells;a surface communication network electrically connected between the surface of the well and the central computer;wherein the surface communication network comprises a plurality of interconnected pipes having electrically isolated portions for communicating information between the surface of the well and the central computer;wherein the downhole data and the surface data is analyzed by the central computer to optimize production of the reservoir.
  • 9. The production control system according to claim 8, further comprising: a second central computer for collecting downhole data and surface data associated with a second reservoir, the second computer receiving the data over a second surface communication network; andwherein the second central computer is electrically connected to the first central computer.
  • 10. The production control system according to claim 8, further comprising: a second central computer for collecting downhole data and surface data associated with a second reservoir, the second computer receiving the data over a second surface communication network;wherein the second central computer is electrically connected to the first central computer over a remote communication network; andwherein the downhole and surface data collected by the second computer and the downhole and surface data collected by the first central computer are analyzed to optimize the production of both the first reservoir and the second reservoir.
  • 11. The production control system according to claim 10, wherein economic data is also provided to one of the central computers, the economic data being considered in conjunction with the surface data and the downhole data from both reservoirs to collectively optimize the production of the first reservoir and the second reservoir.
  • 12. The production control system according to claim 11, wherein the economic data is information on petroleum prices.
  • 13. The production control system according to claim 11, wherein the economic data is information on petroleum supplies.
  • 14. The production control system according to claim 11, wherein the economic data is information on national production controls.
  • 15. The production control system according to claim 11, wherein the economic data is information on pipeline capacities.
  • 16. The production control system according to claim 11, wherein the economic data is information on tanker capacities.
  • 17. The production control system according to claim 11, wherein the economic data is information on location storage limitations.
  • 18. The production control system according to claim 8, further comprising at least one downhole control device electrically connected to the downhole communication network, the downhole control device receiving instructions from the central computer to assist in optimizing the production of the reservoir.
  • 19. The production control system according to claim 18, wherein the downhole control device is a controllable gas-lift valve disposed along the tubing string of the well.
  • 20. The production control system according to claim 18, wherein the downhole control device is an electric submersible pump.
  • 21. The production control system according to claim 18, wherein the downhole control device is a chemical treatment injector.
  • 22. The production control system according to claim 18, wherein the downhole control device is an inflow control device.
  • 23. The production control system according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the wells is a conventional production well.
  • 24. The production control system according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the wells is an injection well.
  • 25. The production control system according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the wells is a multi-lateral production well.
  • 26. The production control system according to claim 8, wherein at least one of the wells is a data observation well.
  • 27. A method for controlling the production of a reservoir having a plurality of wells for producing the reservoir, each well having a borehole extending from the surface, and a tubing string inserted in the borehole, the method comprising the steps of: (a) communicating downhole data from a downhole pod in at least one of the wells to the surface along a downhole communication network utilizing an electrically isolated portion of the tubing string;(b) providing a central computer for collecting the downhole data from one or more wells;(c) communicating the downhole data from the surface of the well to the central computer along a surface communication network; and(d) analyzing the downhole data and communicating instructions from the central computer to at least one of the wells to change selected operating parameters of the well;wherein communicating occurs by passing communication signals along electrically isolated sections of the interconnected pipes.
  • 28. The method according to claim 27 further comprising the step of comparing the downhole data collected by the central computer to a reservoir model.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of the following U.S. Provisional Applications under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), all of which are hereby incorporated by reference: The current application shares some specification and figures with the following commonly owned and concurrently filed applications, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference: The applications referenced in the tables above are referred to herein as the “Related Applications.”

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US01/06985 3/2/2001 WO 00 8/29/2002
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO01/65068 9/7/2001 WO A
US Referenced Citations (147)
Number Name Date Kind
525663 Mottinger Sep 1894 A
2083321 Dunn et al. Aug 1937 A
2257663 Albrecht Sep 1941 A
2379800 Hare Mar 1945 A
2414719 Cloud Jan 1947 A
2917004 Davis et al. Dec 1959 A
3083771 Chapman Apr 1963 A
3087545 O'Brien Apr 1963 A
3247904 Wakefield, Jr. Apr 1966 A
3427989 Bostock et al. Feb 1969 A
3465273 Brock Sep 1969 A
3566963 Blackledge Mar 1971 A
3602305 Kisling, III Aug 1971 A
3659336 Horne May 1972 A
3732728 Fitzpatrick May 1973 A
3793632 Still Feb 1974 A
3814545 Waters Jun 1974 A
3837618 Juhel Sep 1974 A
3980826 Widmer Sep 1976 A
4068717 Needham Jan 1978 A
4087781 Grossi et al. May 1978 A
4295795 Gass et al. Oct 1981 A
4350205 Goldschild et al. Sep 1982 A
4393485 Redden Jul 1983 A
4468665 Thawley et al. Aug 1984 A
4545731 Canalizo et al. Oct 1985 A
4566534 Going, III Jan 1986 A
4576231 Dowling et al. Mar 1986 A
4578675 MacLeod Mar 1986 A
4596516 Scott et al. Jun 1986 A
4630243 MacLeod Dec 1986 A
4648471 Bordon Mar 1987 A
4662437 Renfro May 1987 A
4681164 Stacks Jul 1987 A
4709234 Forehand et al. Nov 1987 A
4738313 McKee Apr 1988 A
4739325 MacLeod Apr 1988 A
4771635 Trevillion Sep 1988 A
4790375 Bridges et al. Dec 1988 A
4793414 Nguyen et al. Dec 1988 A
4839644 Safinya et al. Jun 1989 A
4852648 Akkerman et al. Aug 1989 A
4886114 Perkins et al. Dec 1989 A
4901069 Veneruso Feb 1990 A
4933640 Kuckes Jun 1990 A
4972704 Wellington et al. Nov 1990 A
4981173 Perkins et al. Jan 1991 A
5001675 Woodward Mar 1991 A
5008664 More et al. Apr 1991 A
5031697 Wellington et al. Jul 1991 A
5034371 Tanaka et al. Jul 1991 A
5130706 Van Steenwyk Jul 1992 A
5134285 Perry et al. Jul 1992 A
5160925 Dailey et al. Nov 1992 A
5162740 Jewell Nov 1992 A
5172717 Boyle et al. Dec 1992 A
5176164 Boyle Jan 1993 A
5191326 Montgomery Mar 1993 A
5216285 Hilsenteger et al. Jun 1993 A
5230383 Pringle et al. Jul 1993 A
5236048 Skinner et al. Aug 1993 A
5246860 Hutchins et al. Sep 1993 A
5251328 Shaw Oct 1993 A
5257663 Pringle et al. Nov 1993 A
5267469 Espinoza Dec 1993 A
5278758 Perry et al. Jan 1994 A
5326970 Bayless Jul 1994 A
5331318 Montgomery Jul 1994 A
5353627 Diatschenko et al. Oct 1994 A
5358035 Grudzinski Oct 1994 A
5367694 Ueno Nov 1994 A
5394141 Soulier Feb 1995 A
5396232 Mathieu et al. Mar 1995 A
5425425 Bankston et al. Jun 1995 A
5447201 Mohn Sep 1995 A
5458200 Lagerlef et al. Oct 1995 A
5467083 McDonald et al. Nov 1995 A
5473321 Goodman et al. Dec 1995 A
5493288 Henneuse Feb 1996 A
5531270 Fletcher et al. Jul 1996 A
5535828 der Kinderen et al. Jul 1996 A
5561245 Georgi et al. Oct 1996 A
5574374 Thompson et al. Nov 1996 A
5576703 MacLeod et al. Nov 1996 A
5587707 Dickie et al. Dec 1996 A
5592438 Rorden et al. Jan 1997 A
5662165 Tubel et al. Sep 1997 A
5721538 Tubel et al. Feb 1998 A
5723781 Pruett et al. Mar 1998 A
5730219 Tubel et al. Mar 1998 A
5745047 Van Gisbergen et al. Apr 1998 A
5760892 Koyama Jun 1998 A
5782261 Becker et al. Jul 1998 A
5797453 Becker et al. Aug 1998 A
5881807 Boe et al. Mar 1999 A
5883516 Van Steenwyk et al. Mar 1999 A
5887657 Bussear et al. Mar 1999 A
5896924 Carmody et al. Apr 1999 A
5934371 Bussear et al. Aug 1999 A
5937945 Bussear et al. Aug 1999 A
5941307 Tubel Aug 1999 A
5942990 Smith et al. Aug 1999 A
5955666 Mullins Sep 1999 A
5959499 Khan et al. Sep 1999 A
5960883 Tubel et al. Oct 1999 A
5963090 Fukuchi Oct 1999 A
5971072 Huber et al. Oct 1999 A
5975204 Tubel et al. Nov 1999 A
5975504 Nutter et al. Nov 1999 A
5995020 Owens et al. Nov 1999 A
6012015 Tubel Jan 2000 A
6012016 Bilden et al. Jan 2000 A
6037767 Crescenzo et al. Mar 2000 A
6061000 Edwards May 2000 A
6070608 Pringle Jun 2000 A
6089322 Kelley et al. Jul 2000 A
6123148 Oneal Sep 2000 A
6128508 Francisco et al. Oct 2000 A
6148915 Mullen et al. Nov 2000 A
6189621 Vail, III Feb 2001 B1
6192983 Neuroth et al. Feb 2001 B1
6208586 Rorden et al. Mar 2001 B1
6310534 Brunner Oct 2001 B1
6334486 Carmody et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344781 Slenker Feb 2002 B1
6348876 Wei et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349766 Bussear et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352109 Buckman, Sr. Mar 2002 B1
6420976 Baggs et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429784 Beique et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443228 Aronstam et al. Sep 2002 B1
6445307 Rassi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464004 Crawford et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484800 Carmody et al. Nov 2002 B2
6515592 Babour et al. Feb 2003 B1
6633164 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633236 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 B2
6662875 Bass et al. Dec 2003 B2
6679332 Vinegar et al. Jan 2004 B2
6737951 Decristofaro et al. May 2004 B1
6747569 Hill et al. Jun 2004 B2
6758277 Vinegar et al. Jul 2004 B2
6817412 Haase Nov 2004 B2
6958704 Vinegar et al. Oct 2005 B2
20030056952 Stegemeier et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030086652 Boudreau et al. May 2003 A1
20030131991 Hartog et al. Jul 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (38)
Number Date Country
28296 May 1981 EP
295178 Dec 1988 EP
339825 Nov 1989 EP
492856 Jul 1992 EP
641916 Mar 1995 EP
681090 Nov 1995 EP
697500 Feb 1996 EP
0 721 053 Jul 1996 EP
732053 Sep 1996 EP
919696 Jun 1999 EP
922835 Jun 1999 EP
930518 Jul 1999 EP
0 964 134 Dec 1999 EP
972909 Jan 2000 EP
999341 May 2000 EP
1352416 Oct 2003 EP
2677134 Dec 1992 FR
2695450 Nov 1994 FR
2083321 Mar 1982 GB
2325949 Dec 1998 GB
2327695 Feb 1999 GB
2338253 Dec 1999 GB
2129208 Apr 1999 RU
8000727 Apr 1980 WO
9326115 Dec 1993 WO
9600836 Jan 1996 WO
96 24747 Aug 1996 WO
9716751 May 1997 WO
9737103 Oct 1997 WO
9820233 May 1998 WO
9937044 Jul 1999 WO
9957417 Nov 1999 WO
99 60247 Nov 1999 WO
0004275 Jan 2000 WO
0037770 Jun 2000 WO
0120126 Mar 2001 WO
0165718 Jul 2001 WO
0155555 Aug 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030038734 A1 Feb 2003 US
Provisional Applications (35)
Number Date Country
60177999 Jan 2000 US
60178000 Jan 2000 US
60178001 Jan 2000 US
60177883 Jan 2000 US
60177998 Jan 2000 US
60177997 Jan 2000 US
60181322 Feb 2000 US
60186376 Mar 2000 US
60186380 Mar 2000 US
60186505 Mar 2000 US
60186504 Mar 2000 US
60186379 Mar 2000 US
60186394 Mar 2000 US
60186382 Mar 2000 US
60186503 Mar 2000 US
60186527 Mar 2000 US
60186393 Mar 2000 US
60186531 Mar 2000 US
60186377 Mar 2000 US
60186381 Mar 2000 US
60186378 Mar 2000 US
60186394 Mar 2000 US
60186504 Mar 2000 US
60186379 Mar 2000 US
60186675 Mar 2000 US
60186382 Mar 2000 US
60186503 Mar 2000 US
60220253 Mar 2000 US
60186393 Mar 2000 US
60186394 Mar 2000 US
60186531 Mar 2000 US
60186377 Mar 2000 US
60186381 Mar 2000 US
60186378 Mar 2000 US
60186505 Mar 2000 US