Wireless security system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6310549
  • Patent Number
    6,310,549
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 29, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 30, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is a wireless security system. Each alarm sensor contains three magnetoresistive sensors and that are capable of detecting the three-dimensional vector of a magnetic field. Preferably, the sensors detect the orientation of the door or window based upon the earth's magnetic pole. The three-dimensional vector output of the magnetoresistive sensors is received by a microprocessor on-board the alarm sensor. The microprocessor continuously compares the magnetoresistive sensors output with the maximum allowable position of the door or window. If the magnetoresistive sensors output exceeds the maximum allowable position, the microprocessor will signal an alarm, which is transmitted to the network controller via a transmitter on-board the alarm sensor. If an intruder attempts to disable or override a sensor, the alarm sensor will transmit a tamper signal to the network controller.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to electronic security systems and in particular to wireless security systems.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the U.S., a burglary currently occurs every 13 seconds. Accordingly, security systems have gained popularity for home owners and businesses alike. For businesses that lease spaces, a security system is a necessity to compete in the marketplace. Whether it be the lease of apartments, office space, industrial space or self-storage facilities, the ability to attract new customers is greatly dependent upon a reliable security system to protect the tenants' valuable assets.




For self-storage facilities a reliable security system is important, not only to attract new tenants, but also to retain existing tenants. The term self storage facility describes a plurality of freestanding buildings with a plurality of separate, individual storage units that are typically rented on a monthly basis. In many of these facilities, tenants are responsible for the security of their units. Accordingly, the tenant will put a pad lock on the door to the unit to prevent theft. Unfortunately, the padlock can be easily defeated by simply using a bolt cutter to remove the padlock and gain access to the contents of the unit.




Electronic door alarms are also used in some self-storage facilities. Typically, these individual door alarms are hardwired devices that use a magnetic switch mounted to the floor or wall next to the door and a magnet mounted on the moving portion of the door. When the door is opened the magnet moves away from the switch, causing the switch to open the circuit, thereby signaling the opening of the unit door.




There is a trend toward offering these door alarms in new self-storage facilities. Self-storage facilities that have individual unit door alarms can normally attract a higher number of tenants and charge a higher rent per square foot than those facilities without the alarms. As a result, there is pressure on the owners of existing units to update security in order to retain existing tenants and attract new tenants.




Retrofitting an existing self storage unit with individual door alarms, however, is a difficult task. A hardwired security system is not a viable option, due to logistical problems and overwhelming expense. Typically, magnetic contacts are mounted inside the unit to protect from being defeated by a thief. If the magnetic contacts are mounted inside the unit, however, there is the need to access a tenant's space to install the system. Since the tenant typically puts a padlock on the unit, it is impossible for the owner of the facility to access the individual units without getting permission and cooperation from each tenant. As a result, this type of system is difficult to implement.




If the magnetic contacts were placed on the outside of each unit, in order to avoid accessing all the individual units, there are obvious security concerns. Placing the magnet contacts outside the unit gives a thief access to both the magnet and magnetic switch. Since standard magnets and biased magnets can be easily defeated, the owner of the facility would be forced to use a high-security magnet. Unfortunately, the cost of these high-security magnets dramatically increases the total cost of the system. The cost of using a high-security magnet, along with the costs of wiring, conduit and installation, prevents hardwired systems from being a cost-effective option for retrofitting existing self-storage facilities with security systems.




In order to lower the costs of wiring an existing unit, wireless security systems have been proposed. The wireless security systems work in a similar manner to that of magnetic contact systems. If the magnet moves away from the switch the system will transmit an RF alarm signal to a remote station.




Unfortunately, wireless systems do not work within either new or existing self-storage units, due to the typical metal construction of the units. As a result of the metal construction, the wireless detectors cannot transmit outside the unit to a remote station in a reliable manner. Moreover, the installation of the magnetic contacts, as with the hardwired systems, requires access to all the individual units.




Therefore, there is a need for a reliable security system that can be easily installed in either new or existing self-storage facilities in a cost-effective manner.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to its major aspects and briefly described, the present invention is a wireless security system. Although the system will be described with respect to its application in self-storage facilities, it is clear that the system could be used anywhere a security system is used. Each unit in the facility is preferably equipped with an alarm sensor that is mounted outside the unit on the door or window that allows access to the unit. The alarm sensor continuously detects the position of the door or window with which it is associated. If the door's or window's position is changed, the alarm sensor transmits an alarm signal to the network controller. If an intruder attempts to disable or override an alarm sensor, the alarm sensor will transmit a tamper signal to the network controller.




Each alarm sensor contains three magnetoresistive sensors that are capable of detecting the three-dimensional vector (magnitude and phase) of a magnetic field. Preferably, the magnetoresistive sensors detect the orientation of the door or window based upon the earth's magnetic pole. As a result, a separate magnet is not required and the alarm sensor can detect movement of a door, regardless of whether the door opens about the vertical or horizontal plane. The three-dimensional vector output of the magnetoresistive sensors is received by a microprocessor on-board the alarm sensor. The microprocessor continuously compares the magnetoresistive sensors output with the maximum allowable position of the door or window. If the magnetoresistive sensors' output exceeds the maximum allowable position, the microprocessor will signal an alarm, which is transmitted to the network controller via a transmitter on-board the alarm sensor.




A major advantage of the present invention is that the landlord need not gain access to a tenant's space in order to install the security system. A major feature of the present invention, installation of the sensors on the outside of the door or window, is the key to eliminating the need to access the tenant's space. In self-storage facilities, for example, where the tenant can prevent landlord access, the logistics of obtaining access to each unit for installation is virtually impossible. Accordingly, this feature eliminates the logistical problems with retrofitting an existing unit.




The position of an alarm sensor outside the door or window is a major feature of the present invention. With the alarm sensor outside the unit there is no signal attenuation so a wireless system can be used. As a result of using a wireless system, installation costs are substantially reduced, thereby allowing security systems to be installed cost effectively in existing units.




Another advantage of the present invention is the elimination of the need for a separate magnet and magnetic switch. In the present invention, the alarm sensor uses magnetoresistive sensors to prevent the need for an external magnet. Since the magnetoresistive sensors detect the position of the door or window based upon the earth's magnetic pole, the use of an external magnet, which could be easily defeated, is not necessary.




These and other features and their advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a careful reading of the Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments, accompanied by the following drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the drawings,





FIG. 1

is a schematic overview of a security system, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a detailed schematic of an alarm sensor, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 3

is a detailed schematic of a network controller, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The present invention is a wireless security system. Although the system will be described with respect to its application in self-storage facilities, it is clear that the system could be used anywhere a security system is used. For example, security system could be used to secure any building, bank safe or any other space. Each unit in the facility is preferably equipped with an alarm sensor


100


that is mounted outside the unit on the door or window that allows access to the unit. Each alarm sensor


100


continuously detects the position of an associated door or window that allows entry to a unit. In the event that the position of the door or window exceeds a predetermined position, alarm sensor


100


will transmit an alarm signal to a central network controller


200


. If an intruder attempts to disable or override a sensor, the alarm sensor


100


will transmit a tamper signal to the network controller


200


.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, there is shown a schematic overview of the security system. The security system has three main components: at least one alarm sensor


100


that transmits an alarm signal or tamper signal to a central network controller


200


, depending upon the circumstances, an optional repeater


300


that extends the distance of the sensor transmissions and a network controller


200


that manages the information received by alarm sensors


100


.




Each unit in the facility preferably has an alarm sensor


100


that detects the position of a door or window that allows entry to the unit. Each alarm sensor


100


is mounted outside of the unit at a location on the unit wherein the typical metal construction of the unit will not attenuate the signal transmitted from alarm sensor


100


to network controller


200


. Due to the position of alarm sensor


100


outside the unit, alarm sensor


100


is equipped with tamper switches


112


and


114


to prevent a thief from overriding alarm sensor


100


, as discussed below.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, there is shown a schematic view of an alarm sensor


100


according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Although all components in alarm sensor


100


are preferably battery powered


118


, it is clear that other sources of power could be used. Alarm sensor


100


contains three magnetoresistive sensors


102


,


103


and


104


that are capable of detecting the magnitude and phase of the three-dimensional vector produced by a magnetic field. Preferably, the magnetoresistive sensors


102


,


103


and


104


detect the orientation of the door or window based upon the earth's magnetic pole. As a result, a separate magnet is not required. In the event that there is high ambient magnetic noise, an auxiliary magnet could be located near the sensor. Preferably, magnetoresistive sensors sold under the trademark Honeywell HMC 1021 and HMC1022 are used.




The three-dimensional vector output of magnetoresistive sensors


102


,


103


and


104


is received by a microprocessor


106


. Microprocessor


106


continuously compares the magnetoresistive sensors' outputs with the maximum allowable position of the door or window. If the magnetoresistive sensors' outputs indicate that the door's or window's maximum allowable position has been exceeded, microprocessor


106


will signal an alarm, which is transmitted to network controller


200


via transmitter


108


. In order to continuously monitor the status of sensor


100


, microprocessor


106


sends a message periodically via transmitter


108


with the current status of sensor


100


. By using the magnetoresistive sensors


102


,


103


and


104


in this manner, alarm sensor


100


is able to detect if a door or window has been opened, regardless of whether the door or window opens vertically or horizontally. Preferably, a microprocessor sold under the trademark Atmel AT90LS2333 is used.




Prior to using alarm sensor


100


, the initial “closed” position of the door must be programmed using a reset switch


110


. Reset switch


110


is a magnetic reed relay that allow s alarm sensor


100


to be initialized whenever alarm sensor


100


is first mounted. To install alarm sensor


100


, alarm sensor


100


should be mounted to the outside of unit, on the door or window that provides entry to the unit. With the door or window in the closed position, the installer will force alarm sensor


100


to reset by using an external magnet. After removing the external magnet from alarm sensor


100


, alarm sensor


100


will calibrate for a closed position reading for a period of time. In order to prevent alarm sensor


100


from being defeated by a thief, resetting alarm sensor


100


in this manner will result in microprocessor


106


sending an alarm signal to network controller


200


via transmitter


108


.




Alarm sensor


100


has two tamper switches that prevent alarm sensor


100


from being disabled: a mount tamper switch


114


signals if the sensor is removed from the door or window and a battery door tamper switch


112


signals if the power supply


118


is removed. Both tamper switches


112


and


114


are preferably opto-electronic sensors. Mount tamper switch


114


senses the presence of a flag that is attached to the mounting plate for alarm sensor


100


. If alarm sensor


100


is removed from the door or window, the flag will be removed from alarm sensor


100


by the mechanical movement of alarm sensor


100


being moved. Battery door tamper switch


112


senses the presence of the battery door. If the battery door is removed, battery door tamper switch


112


will signal that the battery door has been removed.




Alarm sensor


100


detects low battery power by having microprocessor


106


compare a portion of battery voltage


118


with a reference voltage


116


. When a threshold battery voltage is crossed, microprocessor


106


will signal a “LOW BATTERY” message to network controller


200


via transmitter


108


.




Alarm sensor


100


sends all signals to network controller


200


using a transmitter


108


. Although numerous RF transmitters could be used to transmit signals to network controller


200


, preferably a transmitter sold under the trademark RF Monolithics HX-2000 is used. The transmissions preferably arc at 900 MHz at a rate of 2400 baud and with 8 to 12 bit encoding. Transmitter


108


will use an antenna preferably with a gain of −8 to −12 dB. It will be clear to one of ordinary skill in the art many different transmission rates, frequencies and encoding techniques could be used.




Referring again to

FIG. 1

, optional repeaters


300


receive the information transmitted by alarm sensors


100


and retransmit the information to network controller


200


. Repeaters


300


simply extend the distance that alarm sensors


100


are able to transmit. In the event that the distance between alarm sensors


100


and network controller


200


is not significant, the use of repeaters


300


is not necessary. It will be clear to one of ordinary skill in the art whether the use of repeaters is necessary to extend the distance that sensors' transmission can be transmitted.




Network controller


200


manages and logs the information received from all alarm sensors


100


. Referring to

FIG. 3

, there is shown a detailed schematic view of a network controller


200


, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Network controller


200


has a receiver


202


to receive the information transmitted from alarm sensors


100


or repeaters


300


. All data received by receiver


202


is transmitted to a microprocessor


208


. Microprocessor


208


records all events received on system memory


206


, including the time that all data is received using a real time clock


204


. In the event of an alarm, network controller


200


checks to see if the tenant of the associated unit is on-site. If the tenant is on-site, no alarm will be sounded. Otherwise, however, network controller


200


will be capable of communicating with an offsite security agent, using cellular, radio or wire communications.




In use, alarm sensor


100


is mounted outside each door on each unit in a facility. In order to program alarm sensor


100


with the “closed” position of the door, an external magnet is placed over alarm sensor


100


. As a result, alarm sensor


100


will calibrate the three-dimensional vector in the closed position, using the earth's magnetic pole as a reference. If the door is moved to a position that exceeds the threshold position, alarm sensor


100


will transmit an alarm signal to network controller


200


. If a thief attempts to remove or override alarm sensor


100


, a tamper signal is transmitted to network controller


200


. In addition, when the battery


118


that powers alarm sensor


100


runs low on power, a low battery signal is transmitted to network controller


200


. Network controller


200


manages and logs the information received from alarm sensors


100


.




It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many substitutions and modifications may be made to the preferred embodiments just described without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, defined by the appended claim.



Claims
  • 1. An alarm sensor comprising:a housing; detecting means carried by said housing for detecting movement of said housing, wherein said detecting means comprises means for detecting changes in the position of said housing relative to the three-dimensional vector of a magnetic field; and alarm means in electrical connection with said detecting means and carried by said housing for signaling when said detecting means detects movement of said housing.
  • 2. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 1, wherein said housing is capable of being mounted to the exterior portion of a door.
  • 3. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 2, further comprising tamper means for detecting the presence of an external magnetic field in proximity to said housing.
  • 4. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 1, wherein said detecting means comprises means for detecting changes in position of said housing relative to the three-dimensional vector of the earth's magnetic field.
  • 5. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 1, wherein said detecting means comprises at least two magnetoresistive sensors.
  • 6. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 1, wherein said housing is mounted to a surface, and wherein said alarm sensor further comprises tamper means for detecting the detachment of said housing from the surface.
  • 7. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 1, wherein said alarm means further comprises means for signaling using RF communications.
  • 8. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 1, wherein said housing is capable of being mounted to a window.
  • 9. An alarm sensor comprising:a housing; detecting means carried by said housing for detecting changes in the position of said housing relative to the three-dimensional vector of the earth's magnetic field; and alarm means in electrical connection with said detecting means and carried by said housing for signaling when said detecting means detects movement of said housing.
  • 10. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 9, wherein said detecting means comprises at least two magnetoresistive sensors.
  • 11. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 10, further comprising tamper means for detecting the presence of an external magnetic field in proximity to said housing.
  • 12. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 10, wherein said housing is mounted to a surface, and wherein said alarm sensor further comprises tamper means for detecting the detachment of said housing from the surface.
  • 13. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 10, wherein alarm means further comprises means for signaling using RF communications.
  • 14. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 10, wherein said housing is capable of being mounted to the exterior portion of a door.
  • 15. The alarm sensor as recited in claim 10, wherein said housing is capable of being mounted to a window.
  • 16. A security system comprising:at least one alarm sensor having a housing, at least two magnetoresistive sensors carried by said housing, said at least two magnetoresistive sensors capable of detecting the three-dimensional vector of a magnetic field; comparator means carried by said housing and in electrical connection with said at least two magnetoresistive sensors, said comparator means capable of determining changes in the detections of said at least two magnetoresistive sensors; alarm means in electrical connection with said at least two magnetoresistive sensors and carried by said housing for signaling when said comparator means determines changes in the detections of said at least two magnetoresistive sensors; and a network controller capable of receiving signals from each said alarm means of said at least one alarm sensor.
  • 17. The security system as recited in claim 16, further comprising tamper means for detecting the presence of an external magnetic field in proximity to said housing.
  • 18. The security system as recited in claim 16, further comprising tamper means for detecting the detachment of said housing from a surface in which said housing is mounted.
  • 19. The security system as recited in claim 16, wherein said housing of said at least one sensor is capable of being mounted to the exterior portion of a door.
US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
3719875 Holland et al. Mar 1973
3745553 Kardashian Jul 1973
4079360 Ookubo et al. Mar 1978
4176305 Cuno Nov 1979
4262335 Ahlen et al. Apr 1981
4354652 Zegarski et al. Oct 1982
4359646 Mejia et al. Nov 1982
4691195 Singelman et al. Sep 1987
4706073 Vila Masot Nov 1987
4835520 Aiello May 1989
4910497 Seachris Mar 1990
5341097 Wu Aug 1994
5748083 Rietkerk May 1998
5877686 Ibey et al. Mar 1999
6043752 Hisada et al. Mar 2000
6049875 Suzuki et al. Apr 2000
6104288 Hopkins Aug 2000