1. Field of the Invention
The invention is directed towards system for monitoring amount of liquid poured from liquid containers.
2. Description of Related Prior Art
The amount of liquids dispensed from liquid containers need to be monitored for many endeavors today. For instance, the management of establishments has long found it necessary to carefully monitor the relationship between liquor dispensed and receipts by controlling the quantity of liquor dispensed from a specific bottle and recording the sale.
A few systems have been proposed to date for measuring and recording the amount of liquid dispensed from liquid containers. One such system includes a spout that is configured to attach to an opening of a liquid container. This spout also uses a portion-control mechanism to control the desired amount of liquid poured from the liquid container. The spout includes a radio transmitter for emitting signals containing activity information. A receiver receives the transmitted signals, and provides these signals to a computer at the establishment at processes the signals into text for viewing.
As in US20040210405, a RF Transceiver is provided to communicate with an outside master Unit for dispensing data. To measure the pour, a detection circuit is provided to detect a pour event.
US20040210405 also disclosed a breather tube provides an air inlet (vent) 307 that allows better fluid flow through the passageway and an engage switch (bottle presence bottom) is forced by on-off button that springs up and seals a sense switch the PCB when the bottom portion is inserted into a liquid container. When the bottom portion is removed from the liquid container, the on-off button springs back and thereby opens the sense switch.
However, the spout in U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,166 is free-pour and it is only measure the amount of liquid poured. There is a need to pour the liquid in a controlled predetermined amount. To avoid excess liquid is poured, an additional control unit outside is necessary to stop it. Even with this additional control unit outside, due to a control time lapse and difference in position between detection and control, it is unlikely to have a precious control in pouring of liquid.
US2005/0263547 describes a pouring stopper. In this known pouring stopper, the magnetic force with said stopper is provided by a coil which affects an armature so that a gasket at both ends of the rod may be caused to assume two positions, where the first position allows filling of liquid from a bottle into a liquid chamber, while the second position is intended to empty the liquid chamber. The magnet arrangement itself, which consists of a coil and a spring-biased armature, is seated extension of the liquid chamber. The coil itself is seated externally on a bottle holder, which means that the pouring stopper cannot be used for hand pouring.
WO2007144002 discloses a pouring stopper for a container, the pouring stopper being opened and closed on the basis of magnetizable rod or plate moved by a coil, the coil and the magnetizable rod or plate are disposed within the liquid chamber. However, the magnetizable rod and a coil is power all the time while the spout is open, which asks high power consumption. And the electronic parts might have the risk of wetting by the liquid (i.e. not being liquid proof).
However, due to the large size of the magnetizable rod and the coil to move the magnetizable rod in WO20007144002 or US2005/0263547, there is a need for a compact and simple pour apparatus that measures the amount of dispensed liquid in a controlled fashion without requiring manual activation.
Moreover, due to the compact and non-disassemble of the current spout in U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,166, when the energy of the battery is used up, the whole spout should be disposed. Therefore, there is also a need to reuse the spout such as recharging the battery.
The main feature of the invention is that a silicone tube inside the spout is the only path for the liquid to go through from the bottle without any restrictions. Meanwhile the rest components are protected from/isolated with liquid (i.e. liquid proof). Thus, the rest components are per se not necessary to be liquid proof. This also guaranties a quick and controlled flow of the liquid and avoids any air bubbles to influence the pour precision.
The silicone tube can be easily squeezed to stop the liquid flow. This can be done by a stepping motor, a motor with gearbox or any other motor.
To ensure that the dosing of liquid from the pour spout is always uniform and accurate it is advantageous that the liquid indicator is sealed into the silicone tube, as it makes it possible to register whether liquid flowing out of the pourer during the entire period of which is pre- or not pre-determined.
Especially, the present invention is to provide a pouring device for a container for the dosing of liquid, said pouring device comprising: a) a housings; b) a passage for the liquid within the housing; c) an electrical operated opening/closing mechanism for opening or closing the passage in order to dosing of a predetermined or registerable amount of liquid, characterized that the passage comprising a silicone tube, and the opening/closing mechanism is to block the silicone tube by squeezing the silicone tube in order to close the passage.
The silicone tube is normally close, and wherein the dosing of liquid is activated by the opening/closing mechanism. The silicone tube is enclosed and pressed by a slide in a condition of normally close.
It further comprises an air inlet valve that is opened for pouring and closed in non-pouring status driven by motor action.
The opening/closing mechanism is operated by a motor.
It further comprises a measuring circuit with multi angle detection that generates data relating to fluid flow through the passage when the detection circuit detects a pour event. The multi angle detection is different to known one or two angle detection. With such multi angle detection, once the tilt process has started, the flow rate can be exactly determined by the measuring circuit such as every 250 ms permanently. To reach the desired pouring quantity, the pouring by opening the silicone tube will be delayed/adjusted according to the bottle tilt position.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent and more readily appreciated from the following detailed description of preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention is related to the modification based on the U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,166. Therefore, non-modified parts or features, such as RF Transceiver, detection circuit, microprocessor, and filter, are omitted hereafter.
To ensure that the dosing of liquid from the pour spout is always uniform and accurate, it is advantageous that a liquid indicator (not shown) is sealed inside the bottom housing (
As shown in
To close the tube or stop the pouring, the motor turns, for example, clockwise (i.e. from
Moreover, it is also due to pressure from the flowing fluid and by the elastic nature of the flexible tube 1 springing back into shape. In case of using sugar containing products the silicone tube might glue together and the tube do not come back to its original open position. To avoid this, the outer parts of silicone with one point fixed 8 (Silicone holder-B) and the other point 7 (Silicone holder-A) moves always with the slide 9 to enforce the opening of the silicone tube by the slide 9 driven by the motor. The motor is preferably a careless permanent magnetic DC motor.
As shown in
However, due to the compact and non-disassemble of the current spout in U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,166, when the energy of the battery is used up, the whole spout should be disposed. Therefore, there is a need to reuse the spout such as recharging the battery. However, if a power input port is provided on the housing, there is a risk of damage the electronic parts inside. Thus, as shown in
A liquid detection is also provided to ensure that the dosing of liquid from the pour spout always uniform and accurate, as in U.S. Pat. No. 6,892,166. In the present invention, it is advantageous that the liquid indicator is sealed into the bottom housing, as it makes it possible to register whether liquid flows out of the pourer during the entire period of time which is pre- or not pre-determined.
As shown in
In some case, the opening/closing mechanism can be further controlled by a watch that is worn by the operator until an authorized signal of the watch is received. RF Transceiver in the pouring device will sent data together with such authorized signal. Therefore, the system can record who handle such pour.
For example, a pair of springs (not shown) is positioned between the slide 9 and the slide guide and the arm head 3 directly contact the slide 9 (i.e. without the pivotally link lever 4) such that in order to open the tube, the slide 9 is pushed away the tube 1 by the pair of springs. Similarly, to close the tube 1, the arm head 3 rotated by the motor and gearbox force would contact the slide 9 against the springs.
It is understood, therefore, that the invention is capable of modification and therefore is not to be limited to the precise details set forth. Rather various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/117,230 filed May 8, 2008, entitled “Wireless Spout and System for Free- and Pre-Measured Dispensing,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2895653 | Giepen | Jul 1959 | A |
3650439 | Shimooka | Mar 1972 | A |
3827467 | Henley et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3920149 | Fortino et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3940036 | Parker | Feb 1976 | A |
3993218 | Reichenberger | Nov 1976 | A |
4261485 | Borg | Apr 1981 | A |
4265370 | Reilly | May 1981 | A |
4282562 | Marino | Aug 1981 | A |
4349042 | Shimizu | Sep 1982 | A |
4436223 | Wilson | Mar 1984 | A |
4653719 | Cabrera et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660744 | Csaszar | Apr 1987 | A |
4736871 | Luciani et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5044521 | Peckels | Sep 1991 | A |
5255819 | Peckels | Oct 1993 | A |
5255822 | Mease et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5318197 | Martindale et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5379916 | Martindale | Jan 1995 | A |
5397027 | Koch et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5505349 | Peckels | Apr 1996 | A |
5527295 | Wing | Jun 1996 | A |
5603430 | Loehrke et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5909100 | Watanabe | Jun 1999 | A |
5947167 | Bogen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6036055 | Mogadam et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6220484 | Martindale | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6394411 | Hafner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409046 | Peckels | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6554589 | Grapes | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6892166 | Mogadam | May 2005 | B2 |
7109863 | Morrison | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7272537 | Mogadam | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7477039 | Rodarte | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7699993 | Larkner | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7750817 | Teller | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7900799 | Kuzar et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8410753 | Opolka | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8608026 | Temko | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8695858 | Zapp | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010011025 | Ohki et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020171559 | Yang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040210405 | Mogadam | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211790 | Werth | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050263547 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018187 | Donna | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027268 | Zapp | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060283882 | Escobar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080195251 | Milner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090230157 | Lindberg | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090277931 | Zapp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100174337 | Stahmann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110016968 | Eichholz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036873 | Peckels | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110255996 | Wickstead et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110309103 | Heatherly et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120211516 | Zapp et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130056502 | Zapp | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86103690 | Feb 1987 | CN |
103 05 441 | Sep 2003 | DE |
1227058 | Jan 2002 | EP |
582032 | Nov 1946 | GB |
1001208 | Aug 1965 | GB |
2000-161533 | Jun 2000 | JP |
8607625 | Dec 1986 | WO |
9319349 | Sep 1993 | WO |
2007144002 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2011133783 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Canada Patent Application No. 2847719, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2015. |
International Search Report mailed on Jun. 18, 2009, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/CN2009/000280 (7 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 14, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,230 (5 pages). |
Final Office Action mailed on Mar. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,230 (6 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Feb. 15, 2013 in related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/053955 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 15, 2013 in related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/053917 (11 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2013 in Chinese Application No. 200980117618.3 (12 pages). |
Office Action mailed Jul. 19, 2013 in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,408 (12 pages). |
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 13, 2013 in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,418 (11 pages). |
Non-Final Office Action mailed on Sep. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,230 to Zapp (13 pages). |
Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 13, 2013, in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,418 (11 pages). |
Final Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,408 (11 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 20, 2014, from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/053917 (8 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 20, 2014, from PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/053955 (5 pages). |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,320 (13 pages). |
Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2014 from Canadian Application No. 2,846,674 (2 pages). |
Office Action mailed May 22, 2014 from Canadian Application No. 2,847,719 (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140367411 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12117230 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 14474696 | US |