This patent application generally relates to power management of sensors. More particularly, it relates to an improved system for powering and communicating with sensors. Even more particularly, it relates to an energy harvesting system for powering and communicating with sensors.
Sensors are being developed for use in roads, bridges, dams, buildings, towers, and vehicles that may provide many different types of information, including displacement, strain, speed, acceleration, temperature, pressure, and force. Providing power to the sensors and communicating data from the sensors has been difficult. The present patent application provides a way to more efficiently provide power for sensors and to communicate with sensors.
Inspection of civil structures are very important for public safety. Litigation costs due to structural failure not only hurts the department held responsible for the failure, but the litigation takes money away from other projects, which in turn, increases public risk by reducing monies available for future maintenance and inspections. We propose to develop an autonomous robotic sensor inspection system capable of remote powering and data collection from a network of embedded sensing nodes, and providing remote data access via the internet. The system will utilize existing microminiature, multichannel, wireless, programmable Addressable Sensing Modules (ASM's) to sample data from a variety of sensors. These inductively powered nodes will not require batteries or interconnecting lead wires, which greatly enhances their reliability and lowers costs.
Networks of sensing nodes can be embedded, interrogated, and remotely accessed in applications where visual inspection by people is not practical due to: physical space constraints, remote geographic locations, high inspection costs, and high risks involved for those performing the inspections. The sensors can indicate the need for repair, replacement, or reinforcement, which will reduce the risks of catastrophic failures and would be useful after natural disasters. Sensors of peak displacement, peak strain, corrosion, temperature, inclination, and other microelectromechanical sensors (MEMS), are now capable of embeddment in structures, and are compatible with our ASM's. The availability of critical structural health data on the internet would greatly assist highway engineers and scientists, to improve their working database on these structures, which will improve our understanding of the safety of civil structures and their requisite maintenance.
In the majority of civil structures, there is little data to help an engineer model the behavior of a structure before it is built or after rehabilitation. This leaves an engineer to rely on past experience to determine what type of repair to apply without truly knowing its affect on the physical strength of the structure. Physical measurements and on-site examinations are performed to assess structural integrity. Typically, maintenance and repairs are not performed until serious structural damage can be seen. In some cases, such as marine structures, damage occurs out of visual site where only specialized sensors can detect distress. Natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, ice storms, and tornadoes, as well as everyday use, collisions, deicing salts, drainage, and corrosion compromise the safety of civil structures.
The soundness of on-site evaluations depends upon the people performing the inspection. The accuracy of the inspection depends on many factors: how thorough is the inspector, their ability to detect unsafe conditions, and the resources available—personnel, financial, equipment, and workload. Civil structures are large and can be located in unsafe and harsh environments. Traffic flow, structure height, the grade around the structure, underwater (pollution), and confined spaces (air poisoning) are a few obstacles inspectors have to overcome. Water pollution has made inspectors sick while checking bridge piers and abutments for scour. Seasonal thawing can increase river flow making bridge inspection dangerous. Steep embankments increase the risk of vehicle overturn. Having a way to interrogate embedded sensing nodes with multiple sensing elements (strain, temperature, vibration, depth, etc.) and inspect structures remotely would save time, equipment costs, personnel costs, and lower health risks to inspectors and the people using the structure.
Environmental influences such as scour, wind, waves, collisions, and corrosion weaken bridge integrity. Scour occurs when (1) sediment is carried away around bridge piers or abutments (2) sediment is removed from the bottom and sides of a river due to the bridge creating a narrower than natural channel for the river to flow through (3) and by everyday river flow carrying away sediment from the river bottom. Floods are the main cause of scour, eroding the ground that supports the bridge. Between the years 1961 and 1976, 46 of 96 major bridge failures were due to scour near piers. In 1987 the Interstate Highway bridge over Schoharie Creek in New York State collapsed killing 10 people, a total of 17 bridges were lost in New York that year due to scour. In 1989 a bridge over the Hatchie River in Covington, Tenn. failed due to scour killing 8 people.
Scour is measured using a number of techniques, such as: fathometers, fixed- and swept-frequency continuous seismic reflection profiling, and ground-penetrating radar. In each case an inspector has to be present to operate the equipment. The ability to monitor scour, as well as peak strain, during a flood using a remote interrogation process would increase safety, give real-time feedback, and potentially save lives.
Railroads provide another opportunity for remote monitoring of embedded sensors. Aug. 10, 1997 in Kingman, Ariz. an Amtrak passenger train derailed as it traveled on a bridge spanning a river. A storm suddenly moved in dumping 1.76″ of rain causing a flash flood. Inspectors had inspected the bridge not more than three hours before the accident, warning sensors located on the bridge failed to stop or warn the train of damage. Remote interrogation hardware could be used to test track continuity as well as measure truss integrity.
Sensors can be embedded in or placed on structures to record physical measurements. Buildings, such as the Millikan Library at Caltech and Factor Building at UCLA as well as dams (Winooski dam in Winooski, Vt.) have been gauged with fiber optic sensors to monitor performance. All of the sensors used rely on power being constantly supplied to the sensor to operate and cables (with connectors) must be embedded in the structure for power and communication. This works well when the structure is easily accessible and power is always available, or, if battery powered, the batteries can be replaced easily. But power is not always available at the time when readings are needed most and batteries can only be embedded if they can be recharged. If the structure is located in a remote area, data may not be accessible when needed. Embedding cable is costly and time consuming during manufacture. Cabling also elevates the risk of failure during everyday operation and disasters.
Presently there is neither a means nor a system that can remotely interrogate an array of independent sensing nodes located throughout a structure. “The Robotic Inspector” (ROBIN, U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,525) was developed at the Intelligent Robotics Lab at Vanderbilt University. ROBIN was developed to inspect man-made structures. Advantages of ROBIN are that it is highly mobile and has versatile fixtures. However, ROBIN carries specific sensors in its limited payload area and is also restricted by a power cord.
Visual/Inspection Technologies, Inc. developed a product called SPOT that uses a pan & tilt zoom camera for pipe inspection. Although SPOT can travel into areas that people cannot, it requires an on-site person for operation, it is only equipped with a camera, it can weigh up to 120 lbs., and SPOT is specific to pipe applications.
NASA has developed a robot to search Antarctica for meteorites and rocks. The robot “Amadeus Nomad” can travel in sever weather conditions which constantly impede human travel. Amadeus Nomad requires minimal human assistance but uses onboard sensors for inspection.
Insects, although possessed of severely limited computational abilities (very small brains) can deal effectively with their environment. An insect's ability to navigate, respond to hazards, and achieve its goals (finding food and a mate) puts any robot to shame. Behavior Control (developed by Prof. Rodney Brooks at MIT in 1986) attempts to encapsulate the computational efficiencies that insects and other organisms use to achieve their impressive results. Behavior Control has proven an effective robot programming strategy for handling dynamic and/or poorly modeled environments. Behavior Control's sensor based strategy produces robots that respond quickly to changing conditions, react robustly to unexpected situations, and degrade gracefully in the presence of sensor faults. The most visible recent success of the Behavior Control methodology was Sojourner, the Mars rover. Sojourner was the culmination of several years of development of Behavior Control robots (Rocky I through Rocky IV) at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL.
There is a need for robust, insect-like, autonomous structural inspection systems which can be used with easily deployed or embedded sensing nodes; and for data collected from these structures to be readily over the Internet. None of the available systems provide power to the sensors and communicate data from the sensors as effectively as possible. Thus, a better system for powering sensors and storage devices, and for transmitting data gathered by sensors is needed, and this solution is provided by the following description
One aspect of the present application is a method of wirelessly communicating sensor data includes providing a wireless sensor module that includes a sensor and a transmitting circuit. The transmitting circuit is connected for wirelessly transmitting data derived from the sensor for receipt by a receiver connected to the internet for providing information derived from said sensor on the internet. The method also includes using said sensor and wirelessly transmitting data derived from the sensor.
Another aspect of the present application is a system comprising a base station having a connection to the internet and a wireless sensor module. The wireless sensor module includes a sensor and transmitting circuit. The transmitting circuit is connected for wirelessly transmitting data derived from the sensor. The base station includes a first circuit for receiving the wirelessly transmitted data. The base station includes a second circuit for communicating information derived from the data to the internet.
Another aspect of the present application is a system, comprising a wireless sensor module and a transmitting circuit. The wireless sensor module includes a sensor and transmitting circuit. The transmitting circuit is connected for wirelessly transmitting data derived from the sensor to a receiver connected to the internet for providing information derived from the sensor on the internet.
The foregoing will be apparent from the following detailed description as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present applicants recognized that unmanned vehicle or robot 20 could approach and wirelessly electromagnetically power a separate device, such as wireless sensing module 22, as shown in
Unmanned vehicle 20 can have wheels 30 for rolling about on a structure (not shown). Wheels 30 can be magnetic so unmanned vehicle 20 sticks to iron containing structures, such as bridges and can crawl around on the structure. It can also have wings for flying. It can be able to recharge while in flight. It can have fins for traveling through water. Other forms of locomotion are also possible. It can be able to recharge batteries 24, interrogate wireless sensing modules 22, or turn on or off actuators (not shown) in inaccessible places, such as underwater or in difficult to reach structures.
A data logging transceiver is described in copending patent application Ser. No. 09/731,066, (“the '066 application”) incorporated herein by reference. The '066 application was filed Dec. 6, 2000 and has docket number 1024-034. The '066 application describes a remotely activated wireless high speed data logging system that receives instructions and transmits data accumulated over time and stored in memory. A wireless high speed data logging system with a transceiver, as described in the '066 application can be used in the present patent application to store data accumulated from the sensor and can then transmit the data. The data may be transmitted directly to a base station. It can also be transmitted to the unmanned vehicle, such as a drone or robot, when the unmanned vehicle is nearby.
Mobile charge monitoring line 36 to processor 38 is used to optimize the position of charging unit 40 on robot 20. Preferably a minimal amount of power is retained in battery 24 so wireless sensor module 22 can operate and its processor 38 can help robot 20 position its charging unit 40. When current is below a minimum the wireless sensor module asks charging unit 40 to move to optimize its position. If totally depleted wireless sensor module 22 could only do that if charging unit 40 on unmanned vehicle 22 is providing enough power to start circuitry 42 on wireless sensor module 22. Wireless sensor module 22 can look at amplitude of current or at spatial derivative to know which direction to move. Positioning can also be accomplished by using the received signal strength from RF transmitter 50. This can be used to help robot 20 find wireless sensor module 22 for coarse positioning. Then, charging circuit monitoring line 36 could be used to more finely tune position of robot's coil 52 (
Charge receive circuit 54 on wireless sensing module 22 has tunable tank circuit 56 with tuning capacitor 58, as shown in
By nature, radio frequency (RF) transmitters 62 or transceivers 62′ tend to be power consumptive. The present patent application does not necessarily need RF transmitter 62 or an RF oscillator for communication. By reducing the power for communication, the distance between wireless sensing module 22 and a receiver on robot 20 can be increased. If robot 20 is providing the power for RF transmitter 62 or transceiver 62′ it has to be close enough to both provide enough power to start up processor 38 on wireless sensor module 22 and to provide power to operate transmitter 62, 62′. If RF transmitter 62, 62′ is eliminated then less power is used and the distance can be increased. One way to accomplish this is to replace RF transmitter 62, 62′ with radio frequency identification (RFID) transponder tag 66, such as is available from Microchip Technologies (Chandler, Ariz.). Use of RFID requires that robot 20 must be located close to a transponder 68 on robot 20 but not be as close as would be required if an RF transmitter were used at wireless sensor module 22. The biggest disadvantage of both techniques is that information is transmitted only when robot 20 is close if the wireless sensor module has no on board power supply.
With the oscillator for RF transmitter 62, 62′ in the circuit of wireless sensor module 22 and with on board power source 24, the transmission of data can be over a greater distance. When charging with robot 20 it is best to turn off or putwireless sensor module 22. Alternatively wireless sensor module 22 can be put into sleep mode to draw minimal power while charging.
In addition to communication between single unmanned vehicle 20 and wireless sensing module 22, there can be many unmanned vehicles 20, and they can also communicate with each other. In addition to charging wireless sensing modules 22, unmanned vehicles 20 can also charge each other. Similarly, wireless sensing modules 22 can talk to each other, to unmanned vehicles 20, to a base station (not shown), or to a remote receiver (not shown), such as a satellite. Communication from wireless sensing module 22 depends largely on power available at wireless sensing module 22, and the present patent application solves this power problem by using a mobile recharging technique.
Wireless sensor modules 22 can be miniaturized by using tiny on board rechargeable power supply 70 including charging circuitry 72 and energy storage 24. Energy storage 24 is charged or recharged by recharging robot 20. For example for wireless sensing modules embedded in a structure in a space vehicle, many wires extending from each of the wireless sensing modules to a solar panel can be avoided by providing small battery or capacitor 24 with each wireless sensing module 22. Robot 20 is provided that includes larger battery 74 that may be recharged using the solar panel. Robot 20′ travels to each wireless sensing module 22 and charges each of the smaller batteries or capacitors 24. Robot 20 can also interrogate wireless sensing modules 22 and obtain sensor data and module ID data.
As an alternative, in applications where batteries are undesirable, robot 20 can provide power to wireless sensing modules 22 and interrogate wireless sensing modules 22 that may be embedded in a structure. Data, including identification, sensor calibration and type, and sensor data may be stored on robot 20. These data can also be transmitted directly from robot 20 as it is received.
Energy to run wireless sensing module 22 or a network of wireless sensing modules 22 can also be taken directly from the environment in some situations. In one embodiment each wireless sensing module 22 in a network has a power source that may be a battery or may be one that takes energy from the environment. Copending patent application 115-008, incorporated herein by reference, filed on the same day as this application, more fully describes a system for harvesting energy from the environment. Each wireless sensing module remains in sleep mode to conserve power. Wireless sensing module 22 wakes up periodically to determines whether a robot is near by checking for its transmitted signal. Little power is needed for this check. If robot 20 is close then wireless sensing module 22 will transmit to robot 20. The transmission can be periodic to avoid collisions with transmissions from other wireless sensing modules. Periodic transmission would include a randomization timer that allows time division multiple access (TDMA) from multiple wireless sensing modules on the network. Wireless sensing module 22 may initially be in sleep mode, as shown in step 80 of
Randomization timer 92 is provided to allow networks of wireless sensor modules 22 to transmit on the same RF channel with a statistically small percentage of RF collisions between wireless sensor module transmissions on the network. The advantage is that transceiver or receiver 100 on robot 20 need only receive signals on one RF channel, allowing it to be smaller and lower in power consumption than a receiver designed to handle many RF frequencies. A system for data collection and internet distribution of data from receiver 100 designed to operate with a network of wireless sensing modules 22 using these TDMA techniques is provided in
Battery 24 on wireless sensing module 22 can be charged wirelessly by robot 20 using electromagnetic radiation from robot 20 to wireless sensing module 22. Once recharged wireless sensing module 22 can send data periodically without robot 20 having to be nearby. Wireless sensing module 22 has either a battery or capacitor 24 to store energy received wirelessly from robot 20. Wireless sensing module 22 can use that energy to transmit a long distance without robot 20 having to visit. For example, small thin rechargeable batteries capable of infinite recharge cycles would provide the ability to transmit a shorter distance multiple times or a longer distance fewer times. Such a battery could transmit 20 miles if the transmission is only once a year or if larger batteries are provided it could transmit more frequently. Or it could transmit 20 feet many times. For example, a 20 mW transmitter can transmit about ⅓ mile and using a lithium ion AA battery which provides about 1000 mA hours on one charge. A transmitter operating at 3V dc and consuming 10 mA would consume 30 mW of power while transmitting. This system would be able to transmit for 33 hours continuously on the lithium ion battery. Such a battery allows lengthening time between robot visits. An advantage of the battery is that the system can be active and can sample and log data from sensors using stored energy so more information can be included in the later transmission.
Having a power source at each wireless sensing module 22, such as rechargeable battery or storage capacitor 24, is a big advantage over a system that can only transmit when robot 20 is near. Without a local power source, wireless sensing module 22 can only transmit in real time and data is missed when robot 20 is away. Acquiring and logging data from sensors 26 consumes one tenth as much power as is used transmitting data from sensors 26. So when acquiring and logging data battery 24 can last much longer, over 300 hours using the same lithium ion battery.
Wireless sensing module 22 can also transmit when there is an event. Wireless sensing module 22 can transmit the information that it needs its battery recharged, that there is a problem sensed at one or more wireless sensing modules 22, that it has updated data, or that all is OK, and it does not need another charge for another 20 days. Robot 20 can have a camera (not shown) as one of its sensors to give it visual inspection capability. In addition to use for powering or communicating with wireless sensing modules 22, unmanned vehicle 20 of the present patent application can also be used to provide power and communicate with actuators, such as a relay, solenoid, piezoelectric or shaped memory alloy.
Rechargeable battery 24, such as a lithium ion battery, a capacitor, or a fuel cell can be used on wireless sensing module 22. Super capacitors are very efficient large capacitors in small packages.
For underwater applications a robot interrogator can also be used but it would require close proximity due to RF attenuation in water. For example, one underwater application would be a robot 20 to interrogate a network of wireless sensing modules 22 designed to measure strain and permanent deformation of welds of an off shore oil pipeline (not shown). In this case robot 20 gets close to each wireless sensing module 22 as it moves up and down the pipe line.
Preferably, each wireless sensing module 22 in a wireless sensing module network has a 16 bit identification code so robot 20 can tell which wireless sensing module 22 it is near and also tell its physical location. Physical location of wireless sensing module 22 can be used by robot 20 to help it determine direction and distance to the next wireless sensing module 22. Preferably robot 20 would carry an orientation sensing module such as described in Ser. No. 09/457,493, docket number 1024-045, filed Dec. 8, 1999, incorporated herein by reference.
Robot 20 can be autonomous, semi-autonomous, or it can be remote controlled. An autonomous robot may be programmed to follow a preset path. Preferably robot 20 would include light, magnetic, or touch sensors for providing feedback to follow a marked path. The marked path could be a painted stripe, a series of magnets, or a series of bumps.
Under remote control robot 20 may be directed in real time. It can also be directed by instructions from wireless sensing modules 22. Robot 20 can contain a navigation system. A component of that navigation system can include a solid state orientation sensor, as described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/457,493, docket number 1024-045, filed Dec. 8, 1999, incorporated herein by reference.
Non-volatile memory 28′ contains an identification address, sensor calibration coefficients, and data from sensors 26 collected since the previous successful interrogation or data transfer. Processor 38 also controls power to sensors to minimize power used by the sensors.
Digital data is communicated from various sensors 26 by digitally varying the reactance of tank circuit 56 used to receive power by wireless sensing module 22a. This is accomplished by providing the signal along coil impedance control line 105 from microprocessor 38 to transistor switch 104 that inserts small capacitor 106 in and out of tank circuit 56′, as shown in
The scalable wireless web sensor networks employ transmitters with direct sensor inputs and receivers, employing time division multiple access (TDMA) techniques, and multiple transmitters that (each with a unique address) can communicate digital data to a single receiver, as shown in
The wireless web sensor networks are scalable and can collect data from up to 1,000 sensors via a single receiver. The receiver is Ethernet enabled and acts as a web server, thereby providing the user with data via a browser or an XML application.
The performance of the network is applicable for structural, agricultural, environmental, military and industrial applications. This system can collect data from hundreds of transmitters, and by utilizing this web-based system allow the information to be shared with an unlimited number of users.
The receiver uses narrowband RF communications at 418 MHz. A functional block diagram of the system is provided in
Each transmitter Tx includes sensor signal conditioning, multiplexer, 16 bit A/D converter, microprocessor, and RF link, as shown in
A sleep timer with random wake-up, as shown in
The receiver includes a single board computer, available, for example, from Rabbit Semiconductor, with Ethernet capability, built in XML and HTML (internet enabled) file transfer protocols, data storage capability (10 Megabytes) and a web server. The receiver detects data from a specific address on the network of sensors and transmitters, and logs the information in its non-volatile memory. Receiver Rx, shown in
The receiver can recognize inputs from an “ad hoc” network of transmitters, and record data from this network over time, along with calibration data unique to each sensor. Depending on the sensor being employed, a transmitter can support up to 5 separate sensors (channels).
The web server interrogates the single board computer from a standard web browser (MicroSoft's Internet Explorer or Netscape's Navigator) to receive multi-channel sensor data from the Single board computer in XML format. The date and time are maintained on the single board computer with battery backup and may be re-programmed or data can be calibrated via the Internet. Data is displayed over time on a continuously running strip chart within the Internet browser's window.
An advantage of XML format is that it can be opened by any conventional internet browser.
Connection for multiple receivers on a LAN and connection of the LAN to a cable modem that connects to a PC console and to the internet through a router and cable modem is shown in
Data transmission can be scheduled, event triggered, or user initiated. Scheduled is the simplest internet communications mode. We have tested firmware that initiates a wireless modem connection via a Kyocera 2235 cell phone, establishes an FTP connection, and uploads data from the base station receiver. With the real-time clock of the RCM2200, data can be delivered on an absolute schedule (for example, upload at 5 PM every day), or on a regular interval (upload every 48 hours).
In event-triggered mode, the base station can initiate the uplink process if the collected data is outside of user-defined critical thresholds. User-Initiated mode is especially helpful during system installation, modification, and demonstration. As described in the flowchart in
To avoid power drain the wireless modem could be turned on in scheduled windows of time. Hardware with substantially reduced standby power requirement can also be used. For example wireless modem SB555, requires only 1 to 2 mA of standby current.
Thus, the receivers are hard wired or wireless internet appliances capable of operating as nodes on an Ethernet LAN. Examples of wireless communications standards compatible with these receivers include 802.11b (WIFI) and Bluetooth.
The system can include a docking station. The unmanned vehicle is able to connect to the docking station for recharging unmanned vehicle batteries or for transferring data to or from the unmanned vehicle.
While several embodiments, together with modifications thereof, have been described in detail herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it will be evident that various further modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the invention as claimed. Nothing in the above specification is intended to limit the invention more narrowly than the appended claims. The examples given are intended only to be illustrative rather than exclusive.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/379,224, filed Mar. 5, 2003, incorporated herein by reference. Applicant claims the benefit of provisional patent application 60/362,432, filed Mar. 7, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. This patent application is related to the following US patent applications: Ser. No. 09/731,066, docket number 1024-034, filed Dec. 6, 2000;Ser. No. 09/801,230, docket number 1024-036, filed Mar. 7, 2001;Ser. No. 09/768,858, docket number 1024-037, filed Jan. 24, 2001;Ser. No. 09/114,106, docket number 1024-041, filed Aug. 11, 1998;Ser. No. 09/457,493, docket number 1024-045, filed Dec. 8, 1999;60/443,120, docket number 115-008, filed Jan. 28, 2003; andSer. No. 10/379,223, docket number 115-008, filed Mar. 5, 2003; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60362432 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10379224 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 12973997 | US |