The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
The invention is related in general to wellsite equipment such as wireline surface equipment, wireline cables and the like.
Deviated wells or wellbores often include extensive horizontal sections in additional to vertical sections. During oilfield operations, it can be particularly difficult to advance tool strings and cables along these horizontal sections. While tool strings descend by gravity in vertical well sections, tractor devices, which are attached to the tool strings are used to perform this task in the horizontal sections, such as those shown in
In particular,
Several problems are associated with tractor or tractoring operations including torque imbalances in wireline cables that may lead to knotting or bird caging during sudden releases of cable tension. Uneven surfaces of wireline cables can abrade or saw into bends in well casings, which may damage the cable and well casing or cause the cable to become stuck.
A weight of the wireline cables imparts a drag on the tractor and the associated equipments such as a tool string and the like. The speed of travel of the tractor, therefore, is limited by the cable weight. The longer and/or more deviated the well, the more power the tractor requires in order to pull the weight of the cable and associated equipment.
A typical wireline cable with metallic armor wires on the outside diameter thereof has high friction with the wellbore including the casing and the like. Much of the power of the tractor, therefore, is used to overcome the friction between the cable and the wellbore. Due to the high friction between the cable and the wellbore a greater pulling power at the surface is also needed in the event of a tractor failure, wherein the cable is used as a life line to pull the tractor assembly out of the well.
Typical wireline cables have about 98% coverage in their outer armor wire strength member layer to fill the armor wire layer to be able to handle the cable and provide protection for the cable core. Due to this coverage, torque imbalances are inherent in this type of wireline cable, which may cause the cable to rotate during changes in the cable tension.
As the tractor travels down the well it may take a tortuous path and that can rotate the cable. To avoid rotating the cable, a swivel connection is used to connect the cable to the tool string to isolate the tool string from this type of torque. Because torque is generated in the cable when under tension, during a sudden release of that tension, the swivel allows the cable to spin, which can result in opening up of the outer armor wires (i.e. birdcaging) and may disadvantageously cause the cable to loop over itself within the casing.
Mono-cables with alloy armor wires typically comprise a single insulated copper conductor at the core for both electrical transmission and telemetry functions. With mono-cables, electric power is transmitted down the central, insulated power conductor and the electric power returns along the armor. However, with long length alloy cables, electrical power return on them is not possible as a galvanized steel armor package is utilized and the highly resistive nature of alloy wires, such as MP35N and HC-265, effectively precludes the production of long length mono-cables with alloy armors. In order to overcome the above issue, coaxial cables were introduced. With coaxial cables, the electrical power is transmitted down a central, insulated conductor, and returns along a serve layer of stranded copper wires covered by a thin layer of polymeric insulation located near the outer edge of the cable core. However, both mono-cables and coaxial cables have the same disadvantages during tractoring operations, as disclosed above.
It remains desirable to provide improvements in wireline cables and/or downhole assemblies. It is desirable, therefore, to provide a cable that overcomes the problems encountered with current cable designs.
Embodiments disclosed herein describe a wireline cable and methods for use with tractors in deviated wells that, when compared to typical wireline cables, is not subject to torque imbalance during tension changes, has a lower coefficient of drag, and is lower in weight, with a high strength-to-weight ratio.
In an embodiment, a method comprises: providing a wireline cable, the cable including a cable core and a substantially smooth exterior surface; attaching a tractor to the wireline cable; and introducing the cable into a wellbore, wherein a torque on the cable is balanced and friction between the cable and the wellbore is minimized by the exterior surface.
In an embodiment, a cable comprises: an electrically conductive cable core for transmitting electrical power; an inner armor wire layer disposed around the cable core; and an outer armor wire layer disposed around the inner armor wire layer, wherein a torque on the cable is balanced by providing the outer armor layer with a predetermined amount of coverage of the inner armor wire layer.
In another embodiment, a cable comprises: an electrically conductive cable core for transmitting electrical power; an inner armor layer disposed around the cable core; and an outer armor layer disposed around the inner armor layer, wherein a torque on the cable is balanced by providing each of the inner armor layer and the outer armor layer with a lay angle of substantially zero.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to
The core 202 is surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 212 (e.g. high modulus steel strength members) which is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 214. The armor wires 212 and 214 may be alloy armor wires. As a non-limiting example the layers 212, 214 are contra helically wound with each other. As shown, a coverage of the circumference of the outer layer 214 over the inner layer 212 is reduced from the 98% coverage found in conventional wireline cables to a percentage coverage that matches a torque created by the inner layer 212. As a non-limiting example the coverage of the outer layer 214 over the inner layer is between about 60% to about 88%. The reduction in the coverage allows the cable 200 to achieve torque balance and advantageously minimizes a weight of the cable 200. An interstitial void created in the outer layer 214 (e.g. between adjacent ones of the armor wires of the outer layer 214) is filled with a polymer as part of a jacket 216. In the embodiment shown, the jacket 216 encapsulates at least each of the layers 212, 214. As a non-limiting example, that jacket 216 includes a substantially smooth outer surface 218 (i.e. exterior surface) to minimize a friction coefficient thereof. It is understood that various polymers and other materials can be used to form the jacket 216. As a further non-limiting example, the smooth outer jacket 216 is bonded from the core 202 to the outer surface 218. In certain embodiments, the coefficient of friction of a material forming the jacket 216 is lower than a coefficient of friction of a material forming the interstices or insterstitial voids of the layers 212, 214. However, any materials having any coefficient of friction can be used.
In operation, the cable 200 is coupled to a tractor in a configuration known in the art. The cable 200 is introduced into the wellbore, wherein a torque on the cable 200 is substantially balanced and a friction between the cable 200 and the wellbore is minimized by the smooth outer surface 218 of the jacket 216. It is understood that various tool strings, such as the tool string 104, can be attached or coupled to the cable 200 and the tractor, such as the tractor 102, to perform various well service operations known in the art including, but not limited to, a logging operation, a mechanical service operation, or the like.
An outer surface of each of the layers 304, 306 includes a suitable metallic coating 312 or suitable polymer coating to bond to the polymeric jacket 308. Therefore, the polymeric jacket 308 becomes a composite in which the layers 304, 306 (e.g. high modulus steel strength members) are embedded and bonded in a continuous matrix of polymer from the core 302 to the outer surface 310 of the jacket 308. It is understood that the bonding of the layers 304, 306 to the jacket 308 minimizes stripping of the jacket 308.
The core 402 is surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 408 which is surrounded by an outer layer of alloy armor wires 410. An interstitial void created in the outer layer 410 (e.g. between adjacent ones of the armor wires of the outer layer 410) is filled with a polymer as part of a jacket 412. In the embodiment shown, the jacket 412 encapsulates at least each of the layers 408, 410. As a non-limiting example, the jacket 412 includes a substantially smooth outer surface 414 to minimize a friction coefficient thereof. It is understood that various polymers and other materials can be used to form the jacket 412. As a further non-limiting example, the jacket 412 is bonded to the insulator 406 disposed in the core 402. In certain embodiments, the coefficient of friction of a material forming the jacket 412 is lower than a coefficient of friction of a material forming the insulator 406. However, any materials having any coefficient of friction can be used.
The core 502 is surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 508, wherein each of the armor wires of the inner layer 508 is formed from a plurality of metallic strands 509. The inner layer 508 is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 510, wherein each of the armor wires of the outer layer 510 is formed from a plurality of metallic strands 511. As a non-limiting example the layers 508, 510 are contra helically wound with each other. An interstitial void created in the outer layer 510 (e.g. between adjacent ones of the armor wires of the outer layer 510) is filled with a polymer as part of a jacket 512. In the embodiment shown, the jacket 512 encapsulates at least each of the layers 508, 510. As a non-limiting example, that jacket 512 includes a substantially smooth outer surface 514 to minimize a friction coefficient thereof.
The core 602 is surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 608, wherein each of the armor wires of the inner layer is formed from a single strand. The inner layer 608 is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 610, wherein each of the armor wires of the outer layer 610 is formed from a plurality of metallic strands 611. As a non-limiting example the layers 608, 610 are contra helically wound with each other. An interstitial void created in the outer layer 610 (e.g. between adjacent ones of the armor wires of the outer layer 610) is filled with a polymer as part of a jacket 612. In the embodiment shown, the jacket 612 encapsulates at least each of the layers 608, 610. As a non-limiting example, that jacket 612 includes a substantially smooth outer surface 614 to minimize a friction coefficient thereof.
The core 702 is surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 712 which is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 714. As a non-limiting example the layers 712, 714 are contra helically wound with each other. An outer surface of each of the layers 712, 714 includes a suitable metallic coating 713, 715 or suitable polymer coating to bond to a polymeric jacket 716 encapsulating each of the layers 712, 714. As a non-limiting example, at least a portion of the jacket 716 is formed from a fiber reinforced polymer.
In the embodiment shown, an outer circumferential portion 717 of the jacket 716 (e.g. 1 to 15 millimeters) is formed from polymeric material without reinforcement fibers disposed therein to provide a smooth outer surface 718. As a non-limiting example, the outer circumferential portion 717 may be formed from virgin polymeric material or polymer materials amended with other additives to minimize a coefficient of friction. As a further non-limiting example, a non-fiber reinforced material is disposed on the jacket 716 and chemically bonded thereto.
The core 802 is surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 808. The inner layer 808 is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 810. As a non-limiting example the layers 808, 810 are contra helically wound with each other. An interstitial void created in the outer layer 810 (e.g. between adjacent ones of the armor wires of the outer layer 810) is filled with a polymer as part of a jacket 812. As a non-limiting example, at least a portion of the jacket 812 is formed from a fiber reinforced polymer. As a further non-limiting example, the jacket 812 encapsulates at least each of the layers 808, 810.
In the embodiment shown, an outer circumferential portion 813 of the jacket 812 (e.g. 1 to 15 millimeters) is formed from polymeric material without reinforcement fibers disposed therein to provide a smooth outer surface 814. As a non-limiting example, the outer circumferential portion 813 may be formed from virgin polymeric material or polymer materials amended with other additives to minimize a coefficient of friction. As a further non-limiting example, a non-fiber reinforced material is disposed on the jacket 812 and chemically bonded thereto.
The core 902 and the shielding wires 907 are surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 908. The inner layer 908 is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 910. As a non-limiting example the layers 908, 910 are contra helically wound with each other. An interstitial void created in the outer layer 910 (e.g. between adjacent ones of the armor wires of the outer layer 910) is filled with a polymer as part of a jacket 912. As a non-limiting example, at least a portion of the jacket 912 is formed from a fiber reinforced polymer. In the embodiment shown, the jacket 912 encapsulates at least each of the layers 908, 910.
In the embodiment shown, an outer circumferential portion 913 of the jacket 912 (e.g. 1 to 15 millimeters) is formed from polymeric material without reinforcement fibers disposed therein to provide a smooth outer surface 914. As a non-limiting example, the outer circumferential portion 913 may be formed from virgin polymeric material or polymer materials amended with other additives to minimize a coefficient of friction. As a further non-limiting example, a non-fiber reinforced material is disposed on the jacket 912 and chemically bonded thereto.
The core 1002 and the insulative material 1011 are surrounded by an inner layer of armor wires 1012 which is surrounded by an outer layer of armor wires 1014. A polymer jacket 1016 is circumferentially disposed (e.g. pressure extruded) on to the outer layer 1014 to fill an interstitial void between the members of the outer layer 1014. As a non-limiting example, that jacket 1016 includes a substantially smooth outer surface 1018 to minimize a friction coefficient thereof. As shown, the jacket 1016 is applied only on the outer layer 1014 and does not abut the core 1002 or the layer of insulative material 1011. In certain embodiments, the jacket 1016 is not chemically or physically bonded to the members of the outer layer 1014.
The core 1102 is surrounded by an inner strength member layer 1110 which is typically formed from a composite long fiber reinforced material such as a U/V-curable or thermal curable epoxy or thermoplastic. As a non-limiting example, the inner armor layer 1110 is pultruded or rolltruded over the core 1102. As a further non-limiting example, a second layer (not shown) of virgin, U/V-curable or thermal curable epoxy is extruded over the inner armor layer 1110 to create a more uniformly circular profile for the cable 1100.
A polymeric jacket 1112 may be extruded on top of the inner strength member layer 1110 to define a shape (e.g. round) of the cable 1100. An outer metallic tube 1114 is drawn over the jacket 1112 to complete the cable 1100. As a non-limiting example, the outer metallic tube 1114 includes a substantially smooth outer surface 1115 to minimize a friction coefficient thereof. The outer metallic tube 1114 and the inner armor layer 1110 advantageously act together or independently as strength members. Each of the inner strength member layer 1110 and the outer metallic tube 1114 are at zero lay angles, therefore, the cable 1100 is substantially torque balanced.
The core 1302 is surrounded by an inner strength member layer 1310 which is typically formed from a composite long fiber reinforced material such as a U/V-curable or thermal curable epoxy or thermoplastic. As a non-limiting example, the inner armor layer 1310 is pultruded or rolltruded over the core 1302. As a further non-limiting example, the inner armor layer 1310 is formed as a pair of strength member sections 1311, 1311′, each of the sections 1311, 1311′ having a semi-circular shape when viewed in axial cross-section.
The polymeric materials useful in the cables of the invention may include, by nonlimiting example, polyolefins (such as EPC or polypropylene), other polyolefins, polyaryletherether ketone (PEEK), polyaryl ether ketone (PEK), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), modified polyphenylene sulfide, polymers of ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE), polymers of poly(1,4-phenylene), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) polymers, fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) polymers, polytetrafluoroethylene-perfluoromethylvinylether (MFA) polymers, Parmax®, any other fluoropolymer, and any mixtures thereof. The long fiber used in the composite of U/V-curable or thermal curable epoxy or thermoplastic may be carbon fiber, glass fiber, or any other suitable synthetic fiber.
Embodiments disclosed herein describe a method and a cable design for use of a wireline cable comprising a torque balanced armor wire and very smooth, low coefficient of friction outer surface to be attached to a tractor that will reduce the weight the tractor has to carry, lower the friction the tractor has to overcome to pull the cable and the tool string through the wellbore and to avoid knotting and birdcaging associated with sudden loss of tension on the wireline cable in such operations.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. In particular, every range of values (of the form, “from about a to about b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a to b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a-b”) disclosed herein is to be understood as referring to the power set (the set of all subsets) of the respective range of values. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments of the invention. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which this invention pertains will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation can be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of this invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/617,270, filed Jun. 8, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/705,094, filed May 6, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/497,142, filed May 9, 2012, which is a 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2010/049783, filed Sep. 22, 2010, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/277,219, filed Sep. 22, 2009. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1948439 | Budscheid | Feb 1934 | A |
1973091 | Miller | Sep 1934 | A |
1995071 | Mackenzie | Mar 1935 | A |
2002061 | House | May 1935 | A |
2003001 | Leece | May 1935 | A |
2118629 | Waldron | May 1938 | A |
2576227 | Hutchins, Jr. | Nov 1951 | A |
2604509 | Blanchard | Jul 1952 | A |
3127083 | Reynolds | Mar 1964 | A |
3259675 | Bowers | Jul 1966 | A |
3313346 | Cross | Apr 1967 | A |
3328140 | Warren | Jun 1967 | A |
3346045 | Knapp | Oct 1967 | A |
3482034 | Rhoades | Dec 1969 | A |
3490125 | Frieling, Jr. | Jan 1970 | A |
3554284 | Nystrom | Jan 1971 | A |
3567879 | Dueker | Mar 1971 | A |
3573349 | Bowers | Apr 1971 | A |
3634607 | Coleman | Jan 1972 | A |
3679812 | Owens | Jul 1972 | A |
3681514 | Rhoades | Aug 1972 | A |
3710859 | Hanes | Jan 1973 | A |
3758704 | Naud | Sep 1973 | A |
3766307 | Andrews, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
4016942 | Wallis, Jr. et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4059951 | Roe | Nov 1977 | A |
4077022 | Pitts, Jr. | Feb 1978 | A |
4131757 | Felkel | Dec 1978 | A |
4131758 | Felkel | Dec 1978 | A |
4197423 | Fusen | Apr 1980 | A |
4250351 | Bridges | Feb 1981 | A |
4259544 | Litauer | Mar 1981 | A |
4281716 | Hall | Aug 1981 | A |
4292588 | Smith | Sep 1981 | A |
4409431 | Neuroth | Oct 1983 | A |
4486252 | Lloyd | Dec 1984 | A |
4522464 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4523804 | Thompson | Jun 1985 | A |
4525813 | Burrage | Jun 1985 | A |
4547774 | Gould | Oct 1985 | A |
4577693 | Graser | Mar 1986 | A |
4606604 | Soodak | Aug 1986 | A |
4644094 | Hoffman | Feb 1987 | A |
4645298 | Gartside, III | Feb 1987 | A |
4673041 | Turner et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675474 | Neuroth | Jun 1987 | A |
4696542 | Thompson | Sep 1987 | A |
4722589 | Priaroggia | Feb 1988 | A |
4729629 | Saito et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4762180 | Wybro et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768984 | de Oliveira et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4825953 | Wong et al. | May 1989 | A |
4899823 | Cobb et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4952012 | Stamnitz | Aug 1990 | A |
4979795 | Mascarenhas | Dec 1990 | A |
4986360 | Laky et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993492 | Cressey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002130 | Laky | Mar 1991 | A |
5088559 | Taliaferro | Feb 1992 | A |
5125061 | Marlier et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125062 | Marlier et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5150443 | Wijnberg | Sep 1992 | A |
5329605 | Wargotz | Jul 1994 | A |
5339378 | Simonds et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5431759 | Neuroth | Jul 1995 | A |
5495547 | Rafie et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5778981 | Head | Jul 1998 | A |
5787217 | Traut et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5857523 | Edwards | Jan 1999 | A |
5894104 | Hedberg | Apr 1999 | A |
5930431 | Lail et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6015013 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030255 | Konishi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053252 | Edwards | Apr 2000 | A |
6060662 | Rafie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6161619 | Head | Dec 2000 | A |
6182765 | Kilgore | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195487 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211467 | Berelsman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6276456 | Head | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6386290 | Headworth | May 2002 | B1 |
6403889 | Mehan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442304 | Crawley et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484806 | Childers et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488093 | Moss | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6555752 | Dalrymple et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559383 | Martin | May 2003 | B1 |
6559385 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6600108 | Mydur et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631095 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659180 | Moss | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675888 | Schempf et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691775 | Headworth | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6745840 | Headworth | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747213 | Bonicel | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763889 | Rytlewski et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776195 | Blasko et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807988 | Powell et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834724 | Headworth | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843321 | Carlsen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6919512 | Guven et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7000903 | Piecyk et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7119283 | Varkey et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7139218 | Hall et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170007 | Varkey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188406 | Varkey et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7235743 | Varkey | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7282644 | Alvey | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7288721 | Varkey et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7326854 | Varkey | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331393 | Hoel | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7402753 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7462781 | Varkey et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465876 | Varkey | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7586042 | Varkey et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7700880 | Varkey et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7719283 | Ishikawa et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730936 | Hernandez-Solis et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798234 | Ju et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7845412 | Sbordone et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8227697 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8387701 | Sbordone | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8413723 | Varkey et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8807225 | Varkey et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8901425 | Varkey et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8969726 | Varkey et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9027657 | Varkey | May 2015 | B2 |
9368260 | Varkey et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9412492 | Varkey et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20030163179 | Hoglund et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040163822 | Zhang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040262027 | Kaczmarski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050217844 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219063 | Viswanathan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060024842 | Nylese | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060151194 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187084 | Hernandez-Marti et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211286 | Shuey | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221768 | Hall et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242824 | Varkey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070000682 | Varkey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070003780 | Varkey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070044991 | Varkey | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158095 | Sridhar et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080083533 | Malone et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080156517 | Varkey et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190612 | Buchanan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090038149 | Varkey | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089998 | Varkey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090194296 | Gillan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090194314 | Varkey et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090283295 | Varkey et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100038112 | Grether | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120222869 | Varkey | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140352952 | Varkey et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160329128 | Varkey et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170268304 | Varkey | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2755741 | Feb 2006 | CN |
201327731 | Oct 2009 | CN |
201413731 | Feb 2010 | CN |
0003104 | Jul 1979 | EP |
0471600 | Feb 1992 | EP |
1216342 | Jun 2002 | EP |
2039878 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2767861 | Mar 1999 | FR |
2234772 | Feb 1991 | GB |
54007186 | Jan 1979 | JP |
2216710 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2002243999 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003151375 | May 2003 | JP |
9948111 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0125593 | Apr 2001 | WO |
02071178 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2006003362 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006027553 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006088372 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007034242 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2011037974 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Examination Report issued n the related CA application 2774775, dated Aug. 16, 2016, (3 pages). |
Lebedev, et al., “The breakdown Strength of two-layer dlielectrics”, High Voltage Engineering, 1999. Eleventh International Symposium, Conf. Publ. No. 467, vol. 4, Aug. 22-27, 1999, pp. 304-307. |
Salama, et al., “Instructional design of multi-layer insulation of power cabels”. Power Systems, IEEE Transations, vol. 7, Issue 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 377-382. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2010/049783, dated May 9, 2011 (7 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2010/049783, dated Mar. 22, 2012 (5 pages). |
Examination Report issued in the related AU application 2010298356, dated Oct. 19, 2015, (3 pages). |
Office Action issued in the related MX application MX/a/2012/003397, dated Jun. 30, 2015 (5 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2010/031218, dated Nov. 17, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2010/031218, dated Oct. 18, 2011 (4 pages). |
Examination Report issued in the related AU application 2010236397, dated Apr. 22, 2015, (15 pages). |
Extended Search Report issued in the related EP Application 10765176.2, dated Mar. 23, 2015 (7 pages). |
Office action issued in the related EP Application 10765176.2, dated Nov. 24, 2017 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report issued in the related EP Application 117933206.1, dated Nov. 28, 2014 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2011/039879, dated Jan. 16, 2012 (9 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2011/039879, dated Dec. 20, 2012 (8 pages). |
Office Action issued in the related MX application MX/a/2012/013746, dated Aug. 23, 2013, (4 pages). |
EP Communication Article 94-3 issued in the related EP Application 117933206.1, dated Dec. 6, 2016 (8 pages). |
Examination Report issued in the related CA application 2799642, dated Mar. 13, 2017 (4 pages). |
Examination Report issued in the related AU Application 2011236038, dated Jul. 28, 2015 (3 pages). |
Office Action issued in the related MX application MX/a/2011/010863, dated Jan. 29, 2014, (8 pages). |
Examination Report issued in the related CA application 2755231, dated Aug. 1, 2017 (5 pages). |
Office Action issued in the related U.S. Appl. No. 16/113,705 dated Sep. 11, 2019 (32 pages). |
Office Action issued in the related Brazil Patent Application No. PI1011343.6 dated Oct. 30, 2019, 6 pages with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190218874 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61277219 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15617270 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16362738 | US | |
Parent | 14705094 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15617270 | US | |
Parent | 13497142 | US | |
Child | 14705094 | US |