The present application relates to wood boards, particularly post-cured wood boards and more particularly to particle board with excellent swelling properties; it also relates to a process for production of such boards.
Particle board is a composite material which is typically manufactured from various kinds of wood particles, such as wood chips, sawmill shavings or saw dust. It can be used especially for the manufacture of various types of furniture, such as cabinets, kitchens, bath furniture and so forth. Generally, particle board (which is sometimes referred to as “chipboard”) is usually produced by mixing wood particles and a binder composition, e.g. a thermo-curable resin, subsequently forming the resulting mixture into a sheet and compressing said sheet under elevated temperatures. Most commonly, urea formaldehyde (UF), melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF) and phenol formaldehyde have been used as binder systems in particle board. Moreover, a variety of additives can be used, including waxes, dyes and release agents, which supplement the particle board with further desired properties. In order to improve the visual appearance and durability of particle board, veneer can be applied onto its visible surfaces.
Particle board has a variety of advantages over conventional wood products and plywood since it is cheaper, and generally denser and more uniform. As a consequence, in many applications particle board has replaced these conventional materials, predominantly for cost reasons.
However, one major disadvantage of particle board in certain applications is that it undergoes significant swelling upon exposure to moisture over a prolonged period of time. This is particularly based on the fact that, particularly urea formaldehyde particle board, is considerably hygroscopic. Exposure to humidity or direct contact with water usually leads to swelling of the material. As a consequence, appearance and strength of the particle board are significantly impaired. Due to this sensitivity to moisture, the application of particle board in humid environments can be disadvantageously restricted. Resistance to moisture and swelling are also important considerations for other types of wood boards, for example plywood, although the structure of plywood generally renders it less susceptible to moisture and swelling that particle board.
A wood board must, of course, satisfy a combination of requirements including satisfactory internal bond strength, modulus of elasticity, bending strength and dimensional stability. Resistance against decay, for example due to mould and/or biodegradation is also important.
It has previously been attempted to manufacture urea formaldehyde particle board having reduced swelling when exposed to moisture, e.g. by using higher amounts of binder. However, the use of significantly higher amounts of binder negatively affects the particle board's overall properties as well as cost efficiency and the cured UF binders still tend to be hydroscopic.
Moreover, it has been suggested to reduce swelling in UF/MUF particle board by applying heat to the finished product, whereby the particle board generally becomes less hygroscopic and hot pressing stress is relieved. However, even though such techniques may basically lead to reduced swelling of the particle board, the extensive application of heat also leads to degradation of the cured UF/MUF binders whereby the structural integrity of the product is negatively influenced.
One specific technical problem underlying the present invention is thus to overcome the above negative effects and to provide particle board with reduced swelling in the thickness direction and a process for producing such particle board.
The above technical problem is solved according to the present invention by providing a process for manufacturing wood board, comprising the steps of:
In one embodiment the wood board is a particle board and the invention provides a process for manufacturing particle board, comprising the steps:
Herein, the term “particle board” includes any kind of particle board which comprises wood particles and a binder composition. Examples of such particle board include medium-density fiberboards (MDF), hardboards or high-density fiberboards having various degrees of density and strength, as well as oriented strand board (OSB). The particle board may be uniform or may have a non-uniform structure, e.g. comprising different layers of material. For example, the particle board may have 3 layers, such as a core layer and two surface layers, wherein each layer may comprise a different wood material and/or grade of wood material and/or density and/or different binder compositions and/or amounts of binders.
The thickness of the particle board may be in the range of 5 to 100 mm. Preferred thicknesses are in the range of 10 to 45 mm or 16 to 22 mm. The thickness of the wood board may be ≥5 mm, ≥8 mm, ≥10 mm, or ≥15 mm and/or ≤100 mm, ≤80 mm, ≤60 mm, ≤50 mm, ≤45 mm or ≤25 mm.
The length of the wood board may be ≥1.5 m, ≥2 m, ≥2.5 m or ≥3 m and/or ≤8 m, ≤6 m or ≤5 m. The width of the wood board may be ≥1 m, ≥1.2 m, ≥1.5 m or ≥1.8 m and/or ≤4 m, ≤3 m or ≤3.5 m.
The term “wood particle” used herein includes any kind of wooden particles or fibers, such as wood chips, wood flakes, sawmill shavings and saw dust or mixtures thereof. Wood particles from both virgin wood and/or reclaimed wood can be used to produce the particle boards of the present invention. In addition, any kind of wood such as birch, beech, alder, pine, spruce, tropical wood and the like can be used as a source for said wood particles. According to the present invention, it is further possible to use mixtures of different types of wood in the manufacture of a particle board. Moreover, wood particles used in the process as defined above may be pre-dried to less than 8%, less than 6% or less than 5% moisture. For example the wood particles may be pre-dried to a moisture content of 1 to 5% moisture, e.g. 2 to 4% moisture or 1.5 to 3.5% moisture.
The expression “carbohydrate binder composition” according to the present invention includes any kind of carbohydrate-based binder composition which can be used for producing particle board or wood board. In contrast to the conventional UF/MUF binders employed in particle board manufacture, the carbohydrate binder used in the process of the present invention is preferably free of or essentially free of formaldehyde and may thus avoid issues associated with use and/or emissions of formaldehyde. Such carbohydrate binder compositions may be no-added formaldehyde binders.
The carbohydrate binder composition may be a binder composition that comprises at least 40% by dry weight carbohydrate(s); it may comprise at least 50%, at least 55% or at least 60% by dry weight carbohydrate(s).
Whilst not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that one advantage provided by the post-curing of the present invention associated with carbohydrate based binders is the possible breakdown or conversion of hygroscopic components in the binder, for example, hemicellulose when present, and the possible incorporation of such components in a cured form; it is believed that this reduces overall water pickup and/or retention and/or swelling. In this way, such degradation products may be useful in actually contributing to the binder efficiency. Furthermore, wood stress release and/or potential increased bacterial resistance may be achieved; for example, any hemicellulose present may support microbial growth and reduction and/or elimination of this or similar species may reduce any susceptibility of the finished product to decay, mould or biodegradation.
Preferably, subsequent to the step (d) of heating and pressing the sheet to obtain a cured wood board and prior to the step (e) of post-curing the wood board, the wood board has:
a) an internal bond strength of ≥0.1 N/mm2 or ≥0.15 N/mm2, preferably ≥0.2 N/mm2 and more preferably ≥0.25 N/mm2, notably measured according to EN 310:1993; and/or
b) a modulus of elasticity in bending of ≥1000 N/mm2, preferably ≥1200 N/mm2 and more preferably ≥1300 N/mm2, notably measured according to EN310:1993; and/or c) a bending strength of ≥5 N/mm2, preferably ≥7 N/mm2 and more preferably ≥10 N/mm2, notably measured according to EN310:1993.
According to one embodiment of the above-defined process, the carbohydrate binder composition comprises at least one carbohydrate component; it may comprise at least one carbohydrate component and at least one amine component.
Herein, the term “carbohydrate component” includes any carbohydrate compound which is capable of reacting (e.g. by application of heat) with the amine component, and optionally further crosslinkers, in order to form a suitably cured product. According to the present invention, the carbohydrate component may be selected from the group consisting of monosaccharides, disaccharides, polysaccharides or a reaction product thereof. The carbohydrate component may comprise at least one reducing sugar.
As used herein, the term “reducing sugar” indicates one or more sugars that contain aldehyde groups, or that can isomerize, i.e. tautomerize, to contain aldehyde groups, which groups may be oxidized with, for example, Cu-ions to afford carboxylic acids. According to the present invention, any such carbohydrate component may be optionally substituted, such as with hydroxy, halo, alkyl, alkoxy, and the like. In any such carbohydrate component, one or more chiral centers may be present, and both possible optical isomers at each chiral center are included in the invention described herein. Further, it is also to be understood that various mixtures, including racemic mixtures, or other diastereomeric mixtures of the various optical isomers of any such carbohydrate component, as well as various geometric isomers thereof, may be used in one or more embodiments described herein.
Moreover, while non-reducing sugars, for instance sucrose, may not be preferable, they may none the less be useful within the scope of the present invention, for example by in situ conversion to a reducing sugar. Further, it is also understood that a monosaccharide, a disaccharide, or a polysaccharide may be partially reacted with a precursor to form a carbohydrate reaction product. To the extent that the carbohydrate reaction product is derived from a monosaccharide, a disaccharide, or a polysaccharide, and maintains similar reactivity with the amine component to form reaction products similar to those of a monosaccharide, a disaccharide, or a polysaccharide with an amine component, the carbohydrate reaction product is within the scope of the expression “carbohydrate component”.
The carbohydrate binder composition may comprise a water soluble pre-reacted binder composition, comprising the reaction product(s) of (i) at least one carbohydrate component, and (ii) at least one nitrogen-containing component. The weight ratio between the carbohydrate component and the nitrogen-containing component may be 0.5:1 to 30:1.
The binder may be in the form of an aqueous solution or dispersion containing at least 20 wt.-%, for example at least 25% wt.-, 30% wt.-, 35% wt.-, 40% wt.-, 45 wt.-%, 50 wt.-%, 55 wt.-%, 60 wt.-%, 65 wt.-%, 70 wt.-%, 75 wt.-% or 80 wt.-% of said pre-reacted binder composition and/or no more than 85 wt.-%, for example no more that 80 wt.-%, 75 wt.-% or 70 wt.-% of said pre-reacted binder composition.
As used herein, the term “pre-reacted binder composition” includes any chemical composition obtainable and/or obtained by reacting a carbohydrate component and a nitrogen-containing component, which may be used as a binder, e.g. for binding loosely assembled matter, either as such or upon further modification.
The pre-reacted binder composition of preferred embodiments of the present invention is based on a carbohydrate component/nitrogen-containing component binder system, i.e. the carbohydrate component(s) and nitrogen-containing component(s) are not only present in small amounts in the starting material to prepare the pre-reacted binder composition of the present invention, but are the major components of the starting material. Accordingly, the total amount of the at least one carbohydrate component and the at least one nitrogen-containing component in the starting material to prepare the pre-reacted binder composition may be at least 20 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the binder composition before pre-reaction. For example, the total amount of the at least one carbohydrate component and the at least one nitrogen-containing component may be at least 30 wt.-%, 40 wt.-%, 50 wt.-%, 60 wt.-%, 70 wt.-%, 80 wt.-%, 90 wt.-%, 95 wt.-%, or 98 wt.-% before pre-reaction.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the total amount of the reaction product(s) of (i) at least one carbohydrate component and (ii) at least one nitrogen-containing component, the unreacted carbohydrate component(s) and the unreacted nitrogen-containing component(s) in the pre-reacted binder composition, i.e. (amount of reaction product(s) of (i) and (ii))+(amount of unreacted carbohydrate component(s))+(amount of unreacted nitrogen-containing component(s)), is at least 20 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the pre-reacted binder composition, for example at least 30 wt.-%, 40 wt.-%, 50 wt.-%, 60 wt.-%, 70 wt.-%, 80 wt.-%, 90 wt.-%, 95 wt.-%, or 98 wt.-%.
The binder may be:
Preferably, any carbohydrate component should be sufficiently non-volatile to maximize its ability to remain available for reaction with the amine component. The carbohydrate component may be a monosaccharide in its aldose or ketose form, including a triose, a tetrose, a pentose, a hexose, or a heptose; or a polysaccharide; or combinations thereof. For example, when a triose serves as the carbohydrate component, or is used in combination with other reducing sugars and/or a polysaccharide, an aldotriose sugar or a ketotriose sugar may be utilized (including glyceraldehyde and dihydroxyacetone, respectively). When a tetrose serves as the carbohydrate component, or is used in combination with other reducing sugars and/or a polysaccharide, aldotetrose sugars (including erythrose and threose) and ketotetrose sugars (including erythrulose), may be utilized. Moreover, when a pentose serves as the carbohydrate component, or is used in combination with other reducing sugars and/or a polysaccharide, aldopentose sugars (including ribose, arabinose, xylose, and lyxose) and ketopentose sugars (including ribulose, arabulose, xylulose, and lyxulose), may be utilized. When a hexose serves as the carbohydrate component, or is used in combination with other reducing sugars and/or a polysaccharide, aldohexose sugars (including glucose (i.e. dextrose), mannose, galactose, allose, altrose, talose, gulose, and idose) and ketohexose sugars (including fructose, psicose, sorbose and tagatose), may be utilized. When a heptose serves as the carbohydrate component, or is used in combination with other reducing sugars and/or a polysaccharide, a ketoheptose sugar (including sedoheptulose) may be utilized. Other stereoisomers of such carbohydrate components not known to occur naturally are also contemplated to be useful in preparing the binder compositions as described herein. In one embodiment, the carbohydrate component is high fructose corn syrup (HFCS).
As mentioned above, the carbohydrate component may be a polysaccharide. For example, the carbohydrate component may be polysaccharide with a low degree of polymerization and includes e.g. molasses, starch, cellulose hydrolysates, or mixtures thereof. According to a specific example, the carbohydrate component is a starch hydrolysate, a maltodextrin, or a mixture thereof. While carbohydrates of higher degrees of polymerization may not be preferable, they may none the less be useful within the scope of the present invention particularly by in situ depolymerization.
Furthermore, according to the present invention, the carbohydrate component may be used in combination with a non-carbohydrate polyhydroxy reactant. Examples of non-carbohydrate polyhydroxy reactants which can be used in combination with the carbohydrate component include, but are not limited to, trimethylolpropane, glycerol, pentaerythritol, polyvinyl alcohol, partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate, fully hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate, and mixtures thereof. For example, the non-carbohydrate polyhydroxy reactant is sufficiently non-volatile to maximize its ability to remain available for reaction with an amine component. Moreover, according to the present invention, the hydrophobicity of the non-carbohydrate polyhydroxy reactant may be a factor in determining the physical properties of a binder prepared as described herein.
Further, herein the expression “amine component” includes any chemical compound, or mixture of compounds, which contain(s) at least one nitrogen atom and which is/are capable of reacting with the at least one carbohydrate component.
According to the present invention, the at least one amine component may be selected from NH3, an inorganic amine or an organic amine comprising at least one primary amine group, as well as salts thereof. For example, as the amine component, NH3 may be used as such (e.g. in form of an aqueous solution), as well as in from of any type of inorganic and organic ammonium salt thereof, as long as these salts are capable of reacting with the carbohydrate component defined above. Specific examples of inorganic ammonium salts include ammonium sulfate (AmSO4), ammonium chloride, and ammonium nitrate.
Moreover, according to the present invention, the amine component may be a polyamine. Herein, the term “polyamine” includes any organic compound having two or more amine groups, which may independently be substituted or unsubstituted.
For example, the polyamine may be a primary polyamine. As used herein, a “primary polyamine” is an organic compound having two or more primary amine groups (—NH2). Within the scope of the term primary polyamine are those compounds which can be modified in situ or isomerize to generate a compound having two or more primary amine groups (—NH2).
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the primary polyamine may be a molecule having the formula H2N-Q-NH2, wherein Q is an alkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, or cycloheteroalkyl, each of which may be optionally substituted. For example, Q may be an alkyl group selected from C2-C24, an alkyl group selected from C2-C9, or an alkyl group selected from C3-C7. According to a preferred embodiment, Q is a C6 alkyl. According to another embodiment, Q may be a cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl or cyclobutyl, or a benzyl group.
As used herein, the term “alkyl” includes a chain of carbon atoms, which may optionally be branched. It is to be further understood that alkyl is preferably of limited length, including C1-C24, C1-C12, C1-C8, C1-C6, and C1-C4. In particular, shorter alkyl groups may add less lipophilicity to the compound and accordingly will have different reactivity towards the carbohydrate component and solubility in a binder solution.
As used herein, the term “cycloalkyl” includes a chain of carbon atoms, which may optionally be branched, where at least a portion of the chain is cyclic. Moreover, according to the present invention it is to be noted that the term “cycloalkyl” also includes polycyclic structures. For example, such cycloalkyls include, but are not limited to, cyclopropyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, 2-methylcyclopropyl, cyclopentyleth-2-yl, adamantyl, and the like. Furthermore, the chain forming cycloalkyl is advantageously of limited length, including C3-C24, C3-C12, C3-C8, C3-C6, and C5-C6. According to the present invention, shorter alkyl chains forming cycloalkyl may add less lipophilicity to the compound and accordingly will have a different behavior.
As used herein, the term “heteroalkyl” includes a chain of atoms that includes both carbon and at least one heteroatom, and is optionally branched. Examples of such heteroatoms include nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur. In certain variations, said hetero-atoms also include phosphorus, and selenium. In one embodiment, a heteroalkyl is a polyether. As used herein, the term “cycloheteroalkyl”, includes a chain of atoms that includes both carbon and at least one heteroatom, such as heteroalkyl, and may optionally be branched, where at least a portion of the chain is cyclic. Particularly, examples of cycloheteroalkyl include, but are not limited to, tetrahydrofuryl, pyrrolidinyl, tetrahydropyranyl, piperidinyl, morpholinyl, piperazinyl, homopiperazinyl, quinuclidinyl, and the like.
Herein, the term “optionally substituted” includes the replacement of hydrogen atoms with other functional groups. Such other functional groups include, but are not limited to, amino, hydroxyl, halo, thiol, alkyl, haloalkyl, heteroalkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, arylheteroalkyl, nitro, sulfonic acids and derivatives thereof, carboxylic acids and derivatives thereof, and the like. Moreover, according to the present invention, any of amino, hydroxyl, thiol, alkyl, haloalkyl, heteroalkyl, aryl, arylalkyl, arylheteroalkyl, and/or sulfonic acid is optionally substituted.
For example, the primary polyamine may be a diamine, triamine, tetramine, or pentamine. According to a specific embodiment, the polyamine is a triamine selected from a diethylenetriamine, 1-piperazineethaneamine, or bis(hexamethylene)triamine. In another embodiment, the polyamine is a tetramine, for example triethylenetetramine. In another embodiment, the polyamine is a pentamine, for example tetraethylenepentamine.
One feature of the primary polyamine is that it may possess low steric hindrance. For example, 1,2-diaminoethane, 1,4-diaminobutane, 1,5-diaminopentane, 1,6-diaminohexane, 1,12-diaminododecane, 1,4-diaminocyclohexane, 1,4-diaminobenzene, diethylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine, 1-piperazineethaneamine, 2-methyl-pentamethylenediamine, 1,3-pentanediamine, and bis(hexamethylene)triamine, as well as 1,8-diaminooctane have low steric hindrance within the scope of the present invention.
According to a preferred embodiment of the process as defined above, the amine component is the primary polyamine 1,6-diaminohexane (hexamethylenediamine, HMDA). In a further embodiment, the amine component is 1,5-diamino-2-methylpentane (2-methyl-pentamethylenediamine).
In another embodiment, the amine component is the primary polyamine polyether-polyamine. For example, according to the present invention, said polyether-polyamine is a diamine or a triamine. In one embodiment, the polyether-polyamine is a trifunctional primary amine having an average molecular weight of 440 known as Jeffamine T403 Polyetheramine (e.g. Huntsman Corporation).
In a further embodiment, the amine component may include a polymeric polyamine. For example, polymeric polyamines within the scope of the present invention include chitosan, polylysine, polyethylene imine, poly(N-vinyl-N-methyl amine), polyaminostyrene and polyvinylamines. In a specific example, the amine component comprises a polyvinyl amine. As used herein, the polyvinyl amine can be a homopolymer or a copolymer.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-defined process, wherein the at least one carbohydrate component is selected from the group consisting of ribose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose, glucose (dextrose), mannose, galactose, allose, altrose, talose, gulose, idose, fructose, psicose, sorbose, dihydroxyacetone, sucrose and tagatose, as well as mixtures thereof, and the at least one amine component is selected from the group consisting of ammonium sulfate (AmSO4), ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, 1,2-diaminoethane, 1,4-diaminobutane, 1,5-diaminopentane, 1,6-diaminohexane, 1,12-diaminododecane, 1,4-diaminocyclohexane, 1,4-diaminobenzene, diethylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine, 1-piperazineethaneamine, 2-methyl-pentamethylenedi-amine, 1,3-pentanediamine, and bis(hexamethylene)-triamine, 1,8-diaminooctane, as well as mixtures thereof.
The carbohydrate binder composition may be used in the form of a solution and/or dispersion of the at least one carbohydrate component and the at least one amine component in a solvent. Herein, the term “solvent” includes any solvent or mixture of solvents which may be used to dissolve or disperse the carbohydrate component and the amine component. For example, the solvent may be water, an organic solvent or mixtures thereof. Examples of organic solvents include alcohols, ethers, esters, ketones, aldehydes, alkanes and cycloalkanes.
The carbohydrate binder composition may be applied to, for example the wood particles, in the form of an aqueous solution or dispersion containing 10 to 95 wt.-%, 20 to 90 wt.-%, 30 to 85 wt.-%, or 40 to 80 wt.-% of total carbohydrate and amine components, based on the total weight of the solution or dispersion.
The amount of carbohydrate component and amine component includes such amounts which allow the formation of a cured binder. According to one embodiment of the process as defined above, the carbohydrate binder composition comprises 50 to 90 wt.-% of total carbohydrate component and 10 to 50 wt.-% of total amine component, based on the total content of carbohydrate and amine components.
According to a specific example of the present invention, in the above-defined process, the carbohydrate binder composition comprises 25 to 50 wt.-% of dextrose monohydrate (DMH), 25 to 50 wt.-% of fructose and 10 to 50 wt.-% of HMDA, based on the total content of carbohydrate and amine components.
Further examples include binder compositions comprising 10 to 90 wt.-%, 10 to 80 wt.-%, 10 to 70 wt.-%, 10 to 60 wt.-% or 10 to 50 wt.-% of DMH, 5 to 80 wt.-%, 10 to 70 wt.-%, 20 to 60 wt.-% or 30 to 50 wt.-% of fructose, and 5 to 50 wt.-%, 10 to 40 wt.-%, and 15 to 35 wt.-% HMDA, based on the total content of carbohydrate and amine components. It is understood that herein all upper and lower borders of ranges may be arbitrarily combined.
The carbohydrate component and the amine component may be used in stoichiometric amounts which result in an essentially complete curing reaction, or may be used in substoichiometric amounts. For example, the carbohydrate binder composition may be prepared by using less amine component than required for a stoichiometric reaction, and subsequent pre-curing said binder composition, e.g. by applying heat. This pre-reacted binder composition is then supplemented with the remaining amine component, e.g. to achieve a stoichiometric ratio. Using such pre-reacted binder compositions provides advantages regarding shelf life of the binder composition and can result in improved curing processes and better internal bond strength.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, in the carbohydrate binder composition, the ratio of carbonyl groups in the carbohydrate component to reactive amino groups in the amine component may be in the range of 5:1 to 1:2. For example, the ratio of carbonyl groups to reactive nitrogen-containing groups may be in the range of 5:1 to 1:1.8, 5:1 to 1:1.5, 5:1 to 1:1.2, 5:1 to 1:1, 5:1 to 1:0.8 and 5:1 to 1:0.5. Further examples include ratios such as 4:1 to 1:2, 3.5:1 to 1:2, 3:1 to 1:2, 2.5:1 to 1:2, 2:1 to 1:2 and 1.5:1 to 1:2.
Herein, the term “reactive amino group” includes any amino group in the amine component which is capable of reacting with the carbohydrate component. Specifically, examples of such reactive amino groups include primary and secondary amino groups, amide groups, imine and imide groups, as well as cyanate and isocyanate groups.
In contrast to the conventional UF/MUF binders employed in particle board manufacture, the use of a carbohydrate binder composition as defined herein is connected to a variety of advantages. For example, in contrast to UF/MUF binders, during post-curing, carbohydrate binders may undergo improved cure/crosslinking with wood break-down products and thus potentially result in improved binding properties. In addition, while UF/MUF binder systems are sensitive regarding exposure to elevated temperatures and tend to degrade under prolonged heat exposure, carbohydrate binder systems are thermally stable at the temperatures required for effectively post-curing particle board.
Finally, during the application of heat in the post-curing step, components of the wood, such as hemicellulose, may break down into sugars which potentially participate in the further curing process of the carbohydrate binder and lead to a stronger product.
Furthermore, it is currently thought that the post-curing of the invention may cause sugars which have not been transformed during initial curing to be transformed, cured or otherwise bound up with the carbohydrate binder during post-curing; they would thus no longer pose any potential detrimental effect for bacterial growth and, indeed, may positively contribute to the strength and/or other properties of the binder. If post-curing occurs at least partially at conditions under which released sugars, for example glucose, would not caramelise (for example below about 150° C. at pH9) the invention may provide a particular benefit of incorporating released sugar(s) into the binder. This may be the case in particular with a carbohydrate+amine binder system.
The carbohydrate binder, when cured, may comprise Maillard reaction products, for example melanoidins, and/or polyester components.
Herein, the term “post-curing” is not specifically restricted and simply means heating the particle board to a temperature above room temperature (20° C.).
Post-curing may provoke a temperature in the wood board, particularly in the core of the wood board, higher than that during initial curing. For example, during particle-board production the core of a particleboard rarely increases in temperature beyond 110-115° C. Post-curing may provoke a higher core temperature than in manufacture and thus produce an effect not seen during initial curing.
During the step of post curing the wood board, notably post curing using RF waves, the internal temperature of the wood board, notably the temperature at the centre of the wood board in its thickness direction, may be raised to a temperature of:
a) ≥100° C., ≥110° C., ≥115° C., ≥120° C., ≥130° C. or ≥140° C., and/or
b) ≤200° C., ≤180° C., ≤170° C. or ≤160° C.;
notably from a temperature at the end of the step of heating and pressing the board (d) which is lower that the temperature attained during the post-curing step by at least 5° C., at least 10° C. or at least 15° C.
In a further embodiment of the process as defined above, the post-curing in step (e) is carried out at a temperature in the range of 75° C. to 280° C. Further examples of the post-curing temperature include ranges of 80 to 260° C., 90 to 240° C., 110 to 220° C. and 130 to 210° C.
The post-curing step (e) of the above-defined process may be carried out by any suitable technique, such as by a heated press, a conventional oven, hot steam, by electromagnetic radiation (notable with a frequency between 1 MHz and 10 GHz) including microwaves and/or electromagnetic radiation in the radio frequency (RF) range. For example, the post-curing step (e) of the cured particle board obtained in step (d) may be performed by applying electromagnetic irradiation at an energy level of at least 50 W, or at least 80 W or at least 100 W and/or at less than 2000 W, less than 1500 W or less than 1000 W. The power of irradiation applied may be at least 5 kW/m2, at least 10 kW/m2 or at least 20 kW/m2; it may be no more than 200 kW/m2, no more than 150 kW/m2 or no more than 100 kW/m2. For example, typical microwave frequencies include 900 MHz and 2450 MHz, while typical RF wave frequencies includes 13, 17 or 40 MHz, without any limitation thereto. Where RF wave frequencies are used the frequency may be ≥0.5 MHz or ≥1 MHz or ≥5 MHz and/or ≤200 MHz or ≤150 MHz or ≤100 MHz.
Further, according to another example, it is envisaged that use of electromagnetic radiation, notably RF energy, for post-curing of timber boards would be used most effective if applied directly after board exit from the curing press. At this point in the manufacturing process, the internal temperature of the timber board will generally be reasonably high, for example above 100° C. This would reduce the input of electromagnetic energy required to reach a target post-cure temperature of, for example 140° C. or 160° C.
In another embodiment, the post-curing step (e) may be carried out by re-heating the particle board in a press at reduced contact pressure; such a procedure is advantageous in that no additional equipment would be required.
According to the present invention, in the process as defined above, heating in the post-curing in step (e) is carried out for a duration of 10 seconds to 30 hours. Further examples include heating periods of 2 minutes to 24 hours, 5 minutes to 18 hours, 10 minutes to 12 hours and 12 minutes to 8 hours. On the other hand, if electromagnetic waves, for example microwaves and/or RF waves, are applied as the energy source to apply heat during the post-curing step, the heating duration of step (e) can be advantageously reduced to much shorter times when compared to conventional heating by hot air and/or steam. If electromagnetic waves, for example microwaves or RF waves, are employed as the source of heat, heating periods of 10 seconds to 10 minutes, 20 seconds to 8 minutes, 40 seconds to 5 minutes, or 60 seconds to 3 minutes may be employed, depending on thickness and density of the particle board, as well as on the frequency and/or power of the electromagnetic waves. The rate of heating and/or the temperature generated using electromagnetic waves may also be controlled by controlling the amount of water present, for example by controlling the amount of water added and/or the amount of water within the substrate wood and/or the amount of any water generated during curing of the binder.
Prior to the post-curing step (e), a plurality of cured wood boards obtained from step (d) may be arranged to form a stack of wood boards, for example a stack comprising at least 2, 3, 4 or 5 wood boards and/or no more than 20, 15, 10 or 8 wood boards. The stack of wood boards may be arranged with each of the wood boards stacked one on top of the other, for example with each wood board substantially horizontal, and notably with each wood board having its surface covering or substantially covering the surface of adjacent wood boards preferably so that the stack has straight sides. The stack may have an overall thickness of ≥2 cm, ≥5 cm or ≥10 cm and/or ≤200 cm, ≤150 cm or ≤100 cm. The post-curing step (e), especially when using electromagnetic radiation, may be carried out a stack of wood boards.
The post-curing process as such will not only occur during the above-mentioned heating periods, but will continue as long as the temperature of the heated particle board is sufficiently high for the respective chemical curing reactions to take place. Accordingly, the post-curing periods may be significantly longer than the heating periods. For example, a stack of 3 to 10 (e.g. 4 to 8) particle boards might be heated by electromagnetic waves for 10 seconds to 5 minutes (e.g. for 30 seconds to 2 minutes) and subsequently stored in a thermally insulated environment in order to maintain the temperature for a prolonged time. This procedure would allow the rapid heating of multiple particle boards and provide post-heating conditions for a desirable degree of post-cure
In view of the above, the overall post-curing period may be in the range of 5 minutes to 72 hours, such as 10 minutes to 48 hours, 15 minutes to 36 hours, 30 minutes to 30 hours, 45 minutes to 24 hours, or 1 hours to 18 hours The overall post-curing may be at least 5 minutes and/or less than 2 hours, or less than 1 hour.
According to a further embodiment of the process as defined above, in step (d), the sheet obtained in step (c) is heated, e.g. in a hot press, with temperatures set in the range of 140° C. to 270° C. to obtain a cured particle-board. Further examples of typical temperatures to be applied in step (d) for preparing the particle board include temperatures set in the range of 150 to 250° C., 160 to 240° C. and 180 to 220° C.
According to another embodiment, in step (d) of the process of the present invention, the sheet obtained in step (c) is pressed, e.g. in a hot press, at a pressure in the range of 20 to 80 bar to obtain a cured particle board. Generally, the pressure to be applied during step (d) depends on various factors, such as type of wood and binder composition, thickness and density of the particle board, temperature, etc. In further examples, the pressure may be from 25 to 75 bar, 30 to 70 bar, or 35 to 65 bar.
According to a further embodiment, in step (d) of the above-defined process, the sheet obtained in step (c) is pressed at a press factor in the range of 2 seconds/mm to 60 seconds/mm to obtain a cured particle board. Thus, the press-time will depend on the thickness of the particle board, and may be, according to further examples of the present invention, in the range of 3 seconds/mm to 40 seconds/mm, 4 seconds/mm to 30 seconds/mm, or 5 seconds/mm to 20 seconds/mm.
The process according to the present invention may further comprise, between step (c) and step (d), a step (c′) of cold-compressing the sheet obtained in step (c).
In the following, further aspects of the present invention are described. However, it should be understood that all definitions provided above in relation to the process of the present invention also apply to the following aspects, if not stated otherwise.
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a wood board, notably a particle board, obtainable by the process as defined above.
In a further embodiment of the above-defined wood board, and particularly in respect of a particle board, swelling in the thickness-direction of the board as determined according to EN 317:1993 for an immersion time of 24 hours is 70% or below, preferably 60% or below and more preferably 50% or below.
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a particle board, characterized in that the swelling in the thickness-direction of the board as determined according to EN 317:1993 for an immersion time of 24 hours is 70% or below, preferably 60% or below and more preferably 50% or below.
In a preferred embodiment, the above-defined particle board shows swelling in the thickness-direction of the board as determined according to EN 317:1993 for an immersion time of 24 hours of 50% or below, 45% or below, 40% or below, 35% or below, or 30% or below. In even more preferred embodiments of the above-defined particle boards, swelling in the thickness-direction of the board as determined according to EN 317:1993 for an immersion time of 24 hours is 25% or below, 20% or below, 15% or below, 10% or below or even 5% or below.
The wood board may be plywood. In this case, the plywood preferably has a class 1 bonding quality, more preferably a class 2 bonding quality and most preferably a class 3 bonding quality according to the requirements of EN 314-2:1993 notably as tested according to EN 314-1:1993.
The wood board may be orientated strand board. Particularly in this case, the wood board may have:
The wood board may be dry process board (MDF) or fibreboard. Particularly in this case, the wood board may have:
The wood board may be particle board. Particularly in this case, the wood board may have:
The following documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference: EN 300:2006; EN 310:1993; EN 314-1:1993; EN 314-2:1993; EN 317:1993; EN 319:1993
The present invention provides a process for manufacturing wood boards, notably particle boards, which are characterized by only little swelling upon contact with moisture, as well as boards obtainable by such a process. According to the present invention, thermal post-curing of wood boards is combined with the use of carbohydrate binder systems, which are especially suitable for such post-curing processes. As mentioned before, the carbohydrate binder systems used in the process of the present invention are preferably chosen to be thermally stable under the required conditions, undergo further curing during heat treatment and compatible with heat degradation products of the wood. Moreover, the use of added formaldehyde is preferably avoided.
In the following, the present invention is further illustrated by providing examples, without being restricted thereto.
A carbohydrate binder composition was prepared by adding HMDA (10.53 g) to pre-react solution consisting of 32.44 g dextrose monohydrate (DMH; 90.9 wt.-% in H2O), 29.59 g fructose (FRU; 100% solid), 10.53 g hexamethylene diamine (HMDA; 70 wt.-% in H2O) and 22.32 g of water. This carbohydrate binder composition corresponds to 40:40:20 wt.-% DMH:FRU:HMDA.
The binder composition (105.3 g; 70 wt.-% in H2O) and wood chips (526.5 g) were mixed and formed into a sheet, with a desired final density of 650 kg/m3. This sheet was pressed with a heated press (Fontijne Lab Econ 600) at 195° C. and 56 bar (504 kN force) pressure. The press factor was 14 s/mm, corresponding to a total press time of 140 seconds.
Subsequently, similar results were achieved at a press factor of about 10 s/mm and less.
Swelling measurements were conducted according to EN 317:1993, if not specified otherwise.
In particular, a thermostatically controlled water bath, capable of maintaining a temperature of (20±1)° C. was used. Particle board samples with a side length of (50±1) mm were prepared and conditioned to constant mass in an atmosphere with a mean relative humidity of (65±5) % and a temperature of (20±2)° C. Constant mass was considered to be reached when the results of two successive weighing operations, carried out at an interval of 24 h, did not differ by more than 0.1% of the mass of the sample. Next, the thickness of each sample was measured to an accuracy of ±0.01 mm at the intersection of the diagonals and the samples were immersed with their faces vertical in clean, still water, having a pH of 7±1 and a temperature of (20±1)° C. This temperature was maintained throughout the test period, which was 2 hours or 24 hours, depending on the experiments. During the test, the samples were separated from each other and from the bottom and the sides of the water bath. The upper edges of the test pieces were covered by (25±5) mm of water throughout the test.
Finally, after the immersion time has elapsed, the samples were taken out of the water, excess water was removed and the thickness was measured of each sample in the same way as mentioned before.
Particle boards obtained according to Example 1 were subjected to post-curing in an oven at a temperature of 140° C. for 24 hours. Subsequently, the particle board samples (50±1 mm×50±1 mm×10±1 mm) were reconditioned as per initial conditioning mentioned above and weight loss and swelling reduction were determined and plotted against each other. The results are shown in
Particle board samples were obtained according to Example 1, except that a press factor of 16 seconds/mm was used, and were subjected to post-curing in an oven at different temperatures for 16 hours.
After post-curing and reconditioning, which was carried out as described above, the density was measured and compared to the initial density of the particle board samples. The results are plotted in
Particle board samples were obtained according to Example 1, except that a press factor of 16 seconds/mm was used. Then, the initial thickness of the particle board samples (50±1 mm×50±1 mm×10±1 mm) was determined and subsequently, thicknesses of said samples after post-curing in an oven at 140° C. and after reconditioning, which was performed as described above, were measured. The results are shown in
Particle board samples were obtained according to Example 1. Then, the particle board samples were subjected to post-curing in an oven at different temperatures (65° C., 90° C., 115° C. and 140° C.) for a duration for 16 hours. After said post-curing treatment, swelling was determined according to EN 317:1993 for immersion times of 2 and 24 hours, respectively. The results concerning swelling reduction are given in
Particle board samples were obtained according to Example 1. Then, the particle board samples were subjected to post-curing in an oven at temperatures of 120° C. and 140° C. for different duration (30 min., 60 min., 90 min. and 120 min.). After said post-curing treatment, swelling was determined according to EN 317:1993 for immersion times of 2 and 24 hours, respectively. The results concerning swelling are given in
Particle board samples were obtained according to Example 1. Individual sample sizes were 100±1 mm×100±1 mm×10±1 mm. RF wave power was varied over the range from 200-800 W. This equates roughly with 20-80 kW/m2 for the sample size used. Some incidences of flaring were observed at the higher power levels which, essentially is the formation of a plasma which induces burning on the surface of the sample. Reduction of the power level prevented flaring but still allowed relatively rapid heating. At a power level of 500 W, a temperature of 140° C. was reached in about 60 seconds and 160° C. in about 80 seconds. At a power level of 400 W, 140° C. was reached in about 80 seconds and 160° C. in about 100 seconds. Temperatures in excess of 180° C. were reached but timings were not recorded due to difficulties with flaring and the need to reduce power input.
After said post-curing treatment, swelling was determined according to EN 317:1993 for immersion times of 2 and 24 hours, respectively. In addition internal bond strength was measured according to BS EN 319:1993. The resulting data is shown in
Particle board samples were obtained according to Example 1 and post-cured in a standard household microwave (700 W) at full power for 40 and 60 seconds, respectively. Sample sizes were 50±1 mm×50±1 mm×10±1 mm. Subsequently, weight loss and swelling (measured according to EN 317:1993, immersion time 24 hours) was determined regarding an original (i.e. non-post-cured) particle board sample and samples having been post-cured for 40 and 60 seconds, respectively. The resulting data is shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1214734.4 | Aug 2012 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/422,104, filed Feb. 17, 2015, which is a U.S. national counterpart application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application Serial No. PCT/EP2013/067204, filed Aug. 17, 2013, which claims priority to GB Application Serial No. 1214734.4, filed Aug. 17, 2012, the entire disclosures of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1801052 | Meigs | Apr 1931 | A |
1801053 | Meigs | Apr 1931 | A |
1886353 | Novotny | Nov 1932 | A |
1902948 | Castle | Mar 1933 | A |
1964263 | Krenke | Jun 1934 | A |
2198874 | Leighton | Apr 1940 | A |
2215825 | Wallace | Sep 1940 | A |
2261295 | Schlack | Nov 1941 | A |
2362086 | Eastes | Nov 1944 | A |
2371990 | Hanford | Mar 1945 | A |
2392105 | Sussman | Jan 1946 | A |
2442989 | Sussman | Jun 1948 | A |
2500665 | Courtright | Mar 1950 | A |
2518956 | Sussman | Aug 1950 | A |
2875073 | Gogek | Feb 1959 | A |
2894920 | Ramos | Jul 1959 | A |
2965504 | Gogek | Dec 1960 | A |
3038462 | Bohdan | Jun 1962 | A |
3138473 | Floyd | Jun 1964 | A |
3222243 | Gaston | Dec 1965 | A |
3231349 | Stalego | Jan 1966 | A |
3232821 | Banks | Feb 1966 | A |
3297419 | Eyre | Jan 1967 | A |
3513001 | Woodhead | May 1970 | A |
3551365 | Matalon | Dec 1970 | A |
3784408 | Jaffe | Jan 1974 | A |
3791807 | Etzel | Feb 1974 | A |
3802897 | Voigt | Apr 1974 | A |
3809664 | Burr | May 1974 | A |
3826767 | Hoover | Jul 1974 | A |
3856606 | Fan | Dec 1974 | A |
3867119 | Takeo | Feb 1975 | A |
3907724 | Higginbottom | Sep 1975 | A |
3911048 | Vargiu | Oct 1975 | A |
3919134 | Higginbottom | Nov 1975 | A |
3922466 | Bell | Nov 1975 | A |
3955031 | Jones | May 1976 | A |
3956204 | Higginbottom | May 1976 | A |
3961081 | McKenzie | Jun 1976 | A |
3971807 | Brack | Jul 1976 | A |
4014726 | Fargo | Mar 1977 | A |
4028290 | Reid | Jun 1977 | A |
4048127 | Gibbons et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4054713 | Sakaguchi | Oct 1977 | A |
4085076 | Gibbons et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4097427 | Aitken | Jun 1978 | A |
4107379 | Stofko | Aug 1978 | A |
4109057 | Nakamura | Aug 1978 | A |
4144027 | Habib | Mar 1979 | A |
4148765 | Nelson | Apr 1979 | A |
4183997 | Stofko | Jan 1980 | A |
4184986 | Krasnobajew | Jan 1980 | A |
4186053 | Krasnobajew | Jan 1980 | A |
4201247 | Shannon | May 1980 | A |
4201857 | Krasnobajew | May 1980 | A |
4217414 | Walon | Aug 1980 | A |
4233432 | Curtis, Jr. | Nov 1980 | A |
4246367 | Curtis, Jr. | Jan 1981 | A |
4259190 | Fahey | Mar 1981 | A |
4265963 | Matalon | May 1981 | A |
4278573 | Tessler | Jul 1981 | A |
4296173 | Fahey | Oct 1981 | A |
4301310 | Wagner | Nov 1981 | A |
4310585 | Shannon | Jan 1982 | A |
4322523 | Wagner | Mar 1982 | A |
4330443 | Rankin | May 1982 | A |
4333484 | Keritsis | Jun 1982 | A |
4357194 | Stofko | Nov 1982 | A |
4361588 | Herz | Nov 1982 | A |
4379101 | Smith | Apr 1983 | A |
4393019 | Geimer | Jul 1983 | A |
4396430 | Matalon | Aug 1983 | A |
4400496 | Butler, Jr. | Aug 1983 | A |
4464523 | Neigel | Aug 1984 | A |
4506684 | Keritsis | Mar 1985 | A |
4520143 | Jellinek | May 1985 | A |
4524164 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4631226 | Jellinek | Dec 1986 | A |
4654259 | Stofko | Mar 1987 | A |
4668716 | Pepe et al. | May 1987 | A |
4692478 | Viswanathan | Sep 1987 | A |
4714727 | Hume, III | Dec 1987 | A |
4720295 | Bronshtein | Jan 1988 | A |
4754056 | Ansel et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4761184 | Markessini | Aug 1988 | A |
4780339 | Lacourse | Oct 1988 | A |
4828643 | Newman | May 1989 | A |
4845162 | Schmitt | Jul 1989 | A |
4906237 | Johansson | Mar 1990 | A |
4912147 | Pfoehler | Mar 1990 | A |
4918861 | Carpenter et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923980 | Blomberg | May 1990 | A |
4950444 | Deboufie | Aug 1990 | A |
4988780 | Das | Jan 1991 | A |
4992519 | Mukherjee | Feb 1991 | A |
5001202 | Denis et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013405 | Izard | May 1991 | A |
5037930 | Shih | Aug 1991 | A |
5041595 | Yang | Aug 1991 | A |
5089342 | Dhein | Feb 1992 | A |
5095054 | Lay | Mar 1992 | A |
5106615 | Dikstein | Apr 1992 | A |
5114004 | Isono | May 1992 | A |
5123949 | Thiessen | Jun 1992 | A |
5124369 | Vandichel | Jun 1992 | A |
5128407 | Layton | Jul 1992 | A |
5143582 | Arkens et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151465 | Le-Khac | Sep 1992 | A |
5167738 | Bichot | Dec 1992 | A |
5198492 | Stack | Mar 1993 | A |
5217741 | Kawachi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5218048 | Abe et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240498 | Matalon | Aug 1993 | A |
5278222 | Stack | Jan 1994 | A |
5300144 | Adams | Apr 1994 | A |
5300192 | Hansen, Sr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308896 | Hansen, Sr. | May 1994 | A |
5318990 | Strauss | Jun 1994 | A |
5336753 | Jung | Aug 1994 | A |
5336755 | Pape | Aug 1994 | A |
5336766 | Koga et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340868 | Strauss et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352480 | Hansen, Sr. | Oct 1994 | A |
5371194 | Ferretti | Dec 1994 | A |
5387665 | Misawa | Feb 1995 | A |
5389716 | Graves | Feb 1995 | A |
5393849 | Srinivasan | Feb 1995 | A |
5416139 | Zeiszler | May 1995 | A |
5421838 | Gosset | Jun 1995 | A |
5424418 | Duflot | Jun 1995 | A |
5434233 | Kiely | Jul 1995 | A |
5447977 | Hansen, Sr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5470843 | Stahl | Nov 1995 | A |
5480973 | Goodlad | Jan 1996 | A |
5492756 | Seale, Jr. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498662 | Tanaka | Mar 1996 | A |
5503920 | Alkire et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5534612 | Taylor | Jul 1996 | A |
5536766 | Seyffer | Jul 1996 | A |
5538783 | Hansen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543215 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545279 | Hall | Aug 1996 | A |
5547541 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547745 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550189 | Qin | Aug 1996 | A |
5554730 | Woiszwillo | Sep 1996 | A |
5562740 | Cook | Oct 1996 | A |
5571618 | Hansen, Sr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578678 | Hartmann | Nov 1996 | A |
5580856 | Prestrelski | Dec 1996 | A |
5582682 | Ferretti | Dec 1996 | A |
5583193 | Aravindakshan | Dec 1996 | A |
5589256 | Hansen, Sr. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589536 | Golino | Dec 1996 | A |
5607759 | Hansen, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608011 | Eck | Mar 1997 | A |
5609727 | Hansen, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614570 | Hansen, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620940 | Birbara | Apr 1997 | A |
5621026 | Tanaka | Apr 1997 | A |
5633298 | Arfaei | May 1997 | A |
5641561 | Hansen | Jun 1997 | A |
5643978 | Darwin | Jul 1997 | A |
5645756 | Dubin | Jul 1997 | A |
5660904 | Andersen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661213 | Arkens | Aug 1997 | A |
5670585 | Taylor | Sep 1997 | A |
5672418 | Hansen | Sep 1997 | A |
5672659 | Shalaby | Sep 1997 | A |
5690715 | Schiwek | Nov 1997 | A |
5691060 | Levy | Nov 1997 | A |
5693411 | Hansen, Sr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719092 | Arrington | Feb 1998 | A |
5719228 | Taylor | Feb 1998 | A |
5756580 | Natori | May 1998 | A |
5763524 | Arkens | Jun 1998 | A |
5788243 | Harshaw et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5788423 | Perkins | Aug 1998 | A |
5807364 | Hansen | Sep 1998 | A |
5855987 | Margel | Jan 1999 | A |
5863985 | Shalaby | Jan 1999 | A |
5885337 | Nohr | Mar 1999 | A |
5895804 | Lee, Sr. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905115 | Luitjes | May 1999 | A |
5916503 | Rettenbacher | Jun 1999 | A |
5919528 | Huijs | Jul 1999 | A |
5919831 | Philipp | Jul 1999 | A |
5922403 | Tecle | Jul 1999 | A |
5925722 | Exner et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929184 | Holmes-Farley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929196 | Kissel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932344 | Ikemoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5932665 | Deporter et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5932689 | Arkens | Aug 1999 | A |
5942123 | McArdle | Aug 1999 | A |
5954869 | Elfersy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5977224 | Cheung | Nov 1999 | A |
5977232 | Arkens | Nov 1999 | A |
5981719 | Woiszwillo | Nov 1999 | A |
5983586 | Berdan, II et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990216 | Cai | Nov 1999 | A |
5993709 | Bonomo | Nov 1999 | A |
6022615 | Rettenbacher | Feb 2000 | A |
6067821 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
6071549 | Hansen | Jun 2000 | A |
6071994 | Hummerich | Jun 2000 | A |
6072086 | James et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077883 | Taylor | Jun 2000 | A |
6090925 | Woiszwillo | Jul 2000 | A |
6114033 | Ikemoto | Sep 2000 | A |
6114464 | Reck | Sep 2000 | A |
6133347 | Vickers, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136916 | Arkens | Oct 2000 | A |
6139619 | Zaretskiy | Oct 2000 | A |
6143243 | Gershun | Nov 2000 | A |
6171444 | Nigam | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171654 | Salsman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180037 | Anderson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194512 | Chen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210472 | Kwan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221958 | Shalaby | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221973 | Arkens | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231721 | Quick, Sr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6274661 | Chen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281298 | Papsin, Jr. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299677 | Johnson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299936 | Reck | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307732 | Tsubaki | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310227 | Sarama | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313102 | Colaco et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319683 | James et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331350 | Taylor | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331513 | Zaid | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340411 | Hansen | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348530 | Reck | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365079 | Winkler | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372077 | Tecle | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379739 | Formanek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395856 | Petty | May 2002 | B1 |
6403665 | Sieker | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407225 | Mang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410036 | De Rosa | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440204 | Rogols | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461553 | Hansen, Sr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468442 | Bytnar | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468730 | Fujiwara | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6469120 | Elfersy | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475552 | Shah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482875 | Lorenz | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6495656 | Haile | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6521339 | Hansen, Sr. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525009 | Sachdev | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538057 | Wildburg | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547867 | Rogols | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555616 | Helbing et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559302 | Shah | May 2003 | B1 |
6562267 | Hansen | May 2003 | B1 |
6596103 | Hansen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613378 | Erhan | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638882 | Helbing | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638884 | Quick | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6699945 | Chen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706853 | Stanssens et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719862 | Quick, Sr. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730730 | Hansen | May 2004 | B1 |
6753361 | Kroner | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6818694 | Hindi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821547 | Shah | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852247 | Bytnar | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858074 | Anderson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861495 | Barsotti | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864044 | Ishikawa | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878800 | Husemoen | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884849 | Chen | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6955844 | Tagge | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962714 | Hei | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989171 | Portman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992203 | Trusovs | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018490 | Hansen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029717 | Ojima | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7067579 | Taylor | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7083831 | Koch | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7090745 | Beckman | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7141626 | Rodrigues | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144474 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7195792 | Boston | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201778 | Smith | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201825 | Dezutter | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202326 | Kuroda | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7241487 | Taylor | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7458235 | Beaufils | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7514027 | Horres | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7655711 | Swift | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7772347 | Swift | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795354 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803879 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7807771 | Swift | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7842382 | Helbing | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854980 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7883693 | Sehl | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888445 | Swift | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7947765 | Swift | May 2011 | B2 |
8114210 | Hampson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8182648 | Swift | May 2012 | B2 |
8211923 | Wagner | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8372900 | Shooshtari | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8377564 | Shooshtari | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8501838 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8680224 | Zhang | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8691934 | Helbing | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8900495 | Pacorel | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9492943 | Hand | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20010017427 | Rosthauser | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010046824 | Nigam | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020000100 | Burg | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025435 | Hansen, Sr. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026025 | Kuo | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028857 | Holy | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032253 | Lorenz | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042473 | Trollsas | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020091185 | Taylor | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096278 | Foster | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123598 | Sieker | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130439 | Kroner | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161108 | Schultz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020197352 | Portman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005857 | Minami | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040239 | Toas | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044513 | Shah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066523 | Lewis | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071879 | Swenson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030116294 | Kehrer | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030134945 | Capps | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148084 | Trocino | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153690 | Husemoen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185991 | Wigger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203117 | Bartkowiak | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002567 | Chen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019168 | Soerens | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024170 | Husemoen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033269 | Hei | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033747 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034154 | Tutin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038017 | Tutin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048531 | Belmares | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040077055 | Fosdick | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079499 | Dezutter | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087024 | Bellocq | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087719 | Rautschek | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122166 | O'Brien-Bernini | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131874 | Tutin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144706 | Beaufils | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152824 | Dobrowolski | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161993 | Tripp | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040209851 | Nelson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213930 | Halabisky | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220368 | Li | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249066 | Heinzman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254285 | Rodrigues | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260082 | Van Der Wilden | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001198 | Bytnar | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017394 | Hochsmann | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027283 | Richard | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033037 | Trusovs | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048212 | Clamen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059770 | Srinivasan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050171085 | Pinto | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196421 | Hunter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202224 | Helbing | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208852 | Weber | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215153 | Cossement | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245669 | Clungeon | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275133 | Cabell | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288479 | Kuroda | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005580 | Espiard | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060044302 | Chen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060099870 | Garcia | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111480 | Hansen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124538 | Morcrette | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135433 | Murray | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141177 | Ligtenberg | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179892 | Horres | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188465 | Perrier | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198954 | Frechem | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231487 | Bartley | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252855 | Pisanova | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281622 | Maricourt | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006390 | Clamen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009582 | Madsen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027281 | Michl | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039520 | Crews | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070082983 | Crews et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123679 | Swift | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123680 | Swift | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129522 | Burckhardt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142596 | Swift | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158022 | Heep | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184740 | Keller | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191574 | Miller | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070270070 | Othman | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287018 | Tutin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292618 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292619 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298274 | Eriksson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009209 | Clamen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009616 | Frank | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051539 | Kelly | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060551 | Crews | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081138 | Moore | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108741 | Van Herwijnen | May 2008 | A1 |
20080160260 | Wada | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080160302 | Asrar | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194738 | Crews | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090169867 | Kelly | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090170978 | Kelly | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090227732 | Glockner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090301972 | Hines | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304919 | Wagner | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306255 | Patel | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324915 | Swift | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100029160 | Srinivasan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058661 | Jackson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080976 | Jackson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100084598 | Jackson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086726 | Jackson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087571 | Jackson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098947 | Inoue | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117023 | Dopico | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129640 | Kelly | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130649 | Swift | May 2010 | A1 |
20100175826 | Huenig | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210595 | Wagner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222463 | Brady | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222566 | Fosdick | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100282996 | Jaffrennou | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100301256 | Hampson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320113 | Swift | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021672 | Crews | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110039111 | Shooshtari | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040010 | Shooshtari | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042303 | Shooshtari | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110045966 | Shooshtari | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110089074 | Jackson | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135937 | Swift | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110190425 | Swift | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110220835 | Swift | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256790 | Toas | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260094 | Hampson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110262648 | Lee | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263757 | Rand | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110306726 | Bailey | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120133073 | Pacorel | May 2012 | A1 |
20120156954 | Eckert | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130029150 | Appley | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130032749 | Jaffrennou | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047888 | Mueller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130059075 | Appley | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082205 | Mueller | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130174758 | Mueller | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130234362 | Swift | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130236650 | Swift | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237113 | Swift | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130244524 | Swift | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140091247 | Jackson | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140134909 | Guo | May 2014 | A1 |
20140357787 | Jobber | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8538765 | Aug 1985 | AU |
9640921 | Jul 1997 | AU |
1090026 | Nov 1980 | CA |
2037214 | Sep 1991 | CA |
2232334 | Nov 1998 | CA |
2458333 | Dec 1999 | CA |
2278946 | Jan 2000 | CA |
2470783 | Dec 2004 | CA |
1251738 | May 2000 | CN |
1905054 | Aug 1969 | DE |
4142261 | Jun 1993 | DE |
4233622 | Apr 1994 | DE |
4308089 | Sep 1994 | DE |
102004033561 | Sep 2005 | DE |
102005023431 | Nov 2006 | DE |
0044614 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0099801 | Feb 1984 | EP |
354023 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0461995 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0524518 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0547819 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0583086 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0714754 | Jun 1996 | EP |
796681 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0826710 | Mar 1998 | EP |
856494 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0873976 | Oct 1998 | EP |
878135 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0882756 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0911361 | Apr 1999 | EP |
915811 | May 1999 | EP |
936060 | Aug 1999 | EP |
976866 | Feb 2000 | EP |
0990729 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1038433 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1193288 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1084167 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1268702 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1382642 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1486547 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1522642 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1698598 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1767566 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2223941 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2253663 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2614388 | Oct 1988 | FR |
809675 | Mar 1959 | GB |
926749 | May 1963 | GB |
1391172 | Apr 1975 | GB |
1469331 | Apr 1977 | GB |
1512066 | May 1978 | GB |
1525541 | Sep 1978 | GB |
2047258 | Nov 1980 | GB |
2078805 | Jan 1982 | GB |
2173523 | Oct 1986 | GB |
2251438 | Jul 1992 | GB |
53113784 | Oct 1978 | JP |
57101100 | Jun 1982 | JP |
5811193 | Jan 1983 | JP |
61195647 | Aug 1986 | JP |
3-173680 | Jul 1991 | JP |
05186635 | Jul 1993 | JP |
7-034023 | Feb 1995 | JP |
09157627 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10234314 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11035491 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11181690 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000327841 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002293576 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003147276 | May 2003 | JP |
2003238921 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004060058 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005306919 | Nov 2005 | JP |
549563 | Jan 2008 | NZ |
1765996 | Aug 1995 | RU |
374400 | Mar 1973 | SU |
1990007541 | Jul 1990 | WO |
1992012198 | Jul 1992 | WO |
1995034517 | Dec 1995 | WO |
1997049646 | Dec 1997 | WO |
1999036368 | Jul 1999 | WO |
199947765 | Sep 1999 | WO |
199960042 | Nov 1999 | WO |
199960043 | Nov 1999 | WO |
200058085 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2001014491 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2001059026 | Aug 2001 | WO |
200200429 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2003029496 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003071879 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2003106561 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004076734 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005087837 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006044302 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006136614 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007014236 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007024020 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007050964 | May 2007 | WO |
2007112335 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008089847 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008089851 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008141201 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009019235 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010139899 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011019590 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011019593 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011019597 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011019598 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011022224 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011022226 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011022227 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011138458 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011138459 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2013150123 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/059730, completed Sep. 22, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/069046, completed Sep. 25, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2008/060185, completed Oct. 23, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2011/057363, completed Sep. 5, 2011. |
Ames, J.M., “The Maillard Browning Reaction—an Update,” Chemistry & Industry, No. 17, 1988, 4 pages. |
“Gamma-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, ”Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002, 1 page. |
Hodge, J.E., Chemistry of Browning Reactions in Model Systems, 1953, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 1, No. 15, pp. 928-943. |
Agyei-Aye et al., “The Role of Anion in the Reaction of Reducing Sugars with Ammonium Salts,” Carbohydrate Research 2002, 337: 2273-2277. |
Laroque et al., “Kinetic study on the Maillard reaction. Consideration of sugar reactivity,” Food Chemistry 2008, 111: 1032-1042. |
Bjorksten et al., “Polyester Resin—Glass Fiber Laminates,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (1954). |
Dow Corning, “A Guide to Silane Solutions,” 2005. |
Knauf Data Sheet, 2006. |
Molasses Corporation, United States Sugar Corporation, http://www.sugalik.com/molasses/composition.html (Sep. 29, 2003). |
Clamen, Guy, “Acrylic Thermosets: A Safe Alternative to Formaldehyde Resins,” Nonwovens World, Apr.-May 2004, pp. 96-102. |
Opposition to AU 2006272595, Amended Statement of Grounds and Particulars, issued from Australian Patent Office, Jul. 6, 2012, 22 pages. |
Decision re Opposition to AU 2006272595, issued from Australian Patent Office, Aug. 14, 2015, 25 pages. |
Opposition to EP 1732968, Notice of Opposition: Prior Art, Scope of the Patent, Reasons for the Opposition, issued from European Patent Office, Mar. 8, 2012, 18 pages. |
Decision re Opposition to EP 1732968, issued from the European Patent Office, Nov. 14, 2014, 5 pages. |
Opposition to EA 019802, submitted to Eurasian Patent Office on Dec. 26, 2014, 36 pages. |
Decision re Opposition to EA 019802, issued by Eurasian Patent Office on Aug. 18, 2015, 15 pages. |
Owens Corning Retiree Update: What Goes Around, Comes Around: A tale of Natural Binders, revised Mar. 20, 2013 p. 4. |
A.P. Bryant, “The Terminology of Sugars,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 26, No. 2, p. 231, Feb. 1934. |
Food Flavor Chemistry, p. 162, Mar. 21, 2009 (English Abstract). |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,502 (9 pages)—dated Sep. 21, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,502 (9 pages)—dated Apr. 4, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (7 pages)—dated Aug. 6, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (9 pages)—Apr. 1, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (14 pages)—dated Nov. 12, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (9 pages)—dated Jul. 10, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (10 pages)—dated Mar. 23, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (13 pages)—dated Oct. 5, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,512 (13 pages)—dated Apr. 6, 2018. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (7 pages)—dated Jun. 7, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (8 pages)—dated Jan. 29, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (7 pages)—dated Aug. 20, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (9 pages)—dated Jun. 9, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (9 pages)—dated Oct. 17, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,469 (9 pages)—dated Jul. 23, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (13 pages)—dated Jun. 21, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (13 pages)—dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (12 pages)—Dec. 17, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (7 pages)—Jul. 15, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (7 pages)—dated Mar. 23, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,539 (7 pages)—dated Dec. 29, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/524,522 (4 pages)—dated Oct. 11, 2011. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,718 (5 pages)—dated Sep. 3, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/667,718 (6 pages)—dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (10 pages)—dated Oct. 7, 2011. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (10 pages)—dated May 10, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (9 pages)—dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/671,922 (5 pages)—dated Apr. 4, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,408 (5 pages)—dated Aug. 15, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,829 (9 pages)—dated Dec. 20, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,829 (6 pages)—dated Jul. 12, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/371,829 (6 pages)—dated Aug. 12, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/637,794 (8 pages)—dated Aug. 12, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/637,794 (9 pages)—dated Mar. 26, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,439 (11 pages)—dated Jan. 8, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,452 (7 pages)—dated Jan. 13, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/696,452 (9 pages)—dated Oct. 27, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,144 (6 pages)—dated Jan. 10, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,144 (7 pages)—dated Jul. 29, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,818 (9 pages)—dated Mar. 26, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,368 (16 pages)—dated Aug. 29, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,368 (11 pages)—dated Apr. 16, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,368 (8 pages)—dated Aug. 21, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (14 pages)—dated Sep. 20, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (10 pages)—dated Apr. 25, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (8 pages)—dated Oct. 9, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,419 (8 pages)—dated Sep. 25, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (23 pages)—dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (12 pages)—dated Apr. 15, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (8 pages)—dated Oct. 7, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,233 (8 pages)—dated Jul. 16, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,238 (8 pages)—dated Jul. 16, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (7 pages)—dated Jan. 10, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (6 pages)—dated Jul. 27, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (9 pages)—dated Mar. 7, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,379 (8 pages)—dated Aug. 20, 2013. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,858 (8 pages)—dated May 11, 2011. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,542 (8 pages)—dated Dec. 26, 2012. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,542 (7 pages)—dated Feb. 10, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/026,394 (6 pages)—dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/272,556 (14 pages)—dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/272,556 (12 pages)—dated Sep. 17, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (17 pages)—dated Dec. 29, 2015. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (22 pages)—dated Sep. 2, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (21 pages)—dated Sep. 26, 2017. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,069 (21 pages)—dated Jun. 6, 2018. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/649,277 (9 pages)—dated Jul. 22, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,915 (8 pages)—dated Nov. 18, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/810,765 (7 pages)—dated Jan. 29, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/828,916 (8 pages)—dated Nov. 25, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,502 (9 pages)—dated Nov. 18, 2016. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/172,432 (16 pages)—dated Apr. 17, 2017. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/177,442 (17 pages)—dated May 19, 2017. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/378,159 (18 pages)—dated Mar. 2, 2017. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/222,122 (8 pages)—dated Nov. 20, 2017. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/310,837 (13 pages)—dated Jun. 21, 2018. |
Office action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/411,972 (9 pages)—dated Jun. 14, 2018. |
Other information—Narrative of verbal disclosure of Brian Swift (1 page)—dated May 13, 2014. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (52 pages, filed Jun. 12, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (58 pages, filed Jun. 12, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210). |
1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. D. 631,670 (68 pages, filed Jun. 19, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. D. 631,670 (62 pages, filed Nov. 2, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Decision of PTAB regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Patent No. D. 631,670 (33 pages)—dated Jan. 12, 2016. |
Decision2 of PTAB regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Patent No. D631,670 (27 pages)—dated May 9, 2016. |
Final Written Decision of PTAB regarding Inter Partes Review of D. 631,670 based on 1st Petition (56 pages)—dated Jan. 11, 2017. |
Final Written Decision of PTAB regarding Inter Partes Review of D. 631,670 based on 2nd Petition (55 pages)—dated May 8, 2017. |
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Judgment from Appeal of PTAB Decisions in Inter Partes Reviews of U.S. Patent No. D. 631,670 (2 pages)—dated Jul. 13, 2018. |
1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (61 pages, filed Jul. 1, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (70 pages, filed Jul. 1, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089). |
2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (56 pages, filed Jul. 10, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (67 pages, filed Jul. 10, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089). |
3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (62 pages, filed Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (76 pages, filed Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089). |
Declaration of Dr. Elam Leed (11 pages, filed Jul. 1, Jul. 10, and Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089, respectively). |
Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Vickers (10 pages, filed Jul. 1, Jul. 10, and Jul. 17, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089, respectively). |
1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (60 pages, filed Jul. 29, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (72 pages, filed Jul. 29, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827). |
2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (51 pages, filed Aug. 5, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (65 pages, filed Aug. 5, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 2nd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827). |
3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (57 pages, filed Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Declaration of Dr. Frederick J. Hirsekorn Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (75 pages, filed Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827). |
Declaration of Dr. Elam Leed (11 pages, filed Jul. 29, Aug. 5, and Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827, respectively). |
Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Vickers (10 pages, filed Jul. 29, Aug. 5, and Aug. 7, 2015 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc. in connection with 1st, 2nd and 3rd Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827, respectively). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,469,747 (67 pages, filed Mar. 20, 2018 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,828,287 (86 pages, filed Mar. 23, 2018 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,464,207 (78 pages, filed Mar. 28, 2018 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,926,464 (74 pages, filed Mar. 30, 2018 by Petitioners Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc.). |
Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (20 pages)—Jul. 24, 2015. |
Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (23 pages)—Jul. 24, 2015. |
Final Rejection in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (31 pages)—Aug. 18, 2015. |
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (4 pages)—Oct. 6, 2015. |
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (4 pages)—Oct. 6, 2015. |
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (4 pages)—Nov. 18, 2015. |
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (8 pages)—Mar. 23, 2016. |
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (8 pages)—Mar. 23, 2016. |
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (8 pages)—Mar. 22, 2016. |
Decision of PTAB in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (17 pages)—Sep. 29, 2016. |
Decision of PTAB in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (18 pages)—Sep. 29, 2016. |
Decision of PTAB in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (22 pages)—Sep. 30, 2016. |
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Judgment from Consolidated Appeal of PTAB Decisions in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445, 7,772,347 and 7,854,980 (5 pages)—Mar. 9, 2018. |
Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (34 pages)—May 1, 2015. |
Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (36 pages)—May 1, 2015. |
Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (25 pages)—Jul. 30, 2015. |
Remand Order of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (5 pages)—Dec. 9, 2015. |
Remand Order of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (5 pages)—Dec. 9 , 2015. |
Examiner's Determination on Patent Owner Response/Requester Comments after Board Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (22 pages)—Oct. 17, 2016. |
Examiner's Determination on Patent Owner Response/Requester Comments after Board Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (17 pages)—Oct. 17, 2016. |
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Opinion/Judgment from Appeal of PTAB Decision in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,980 (13 pages)—Feb. 27, 2017. |
Final Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (25 pages)—Sep. 8, 2017. |
Final Decision of PTAB in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (24 pages)—Sep. 8, 2017. |
Decision of PTAB re Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,888,445 (7 pages)—Feb. 12, 2018. |
Decision of PTAB re Request for Rehearing in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,347 (7 pages)—Feb. 12, 2018. |
Decision of PTAB regarding Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (20 pages)—Oct. 21, 2015. |
Final Written Decision of PTAB regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (39 pages)—dated Oct. 19, 2016. |
Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Judgment from Appeal of PTAB Decision in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,210 (5 pages)—Jan. 16, 2018. |
Decision1 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (16 pages)—Dec. 17, 2015. |
Decision2 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (19 pages)—Dec. 17, 2015. |
Decision3 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,940,089 (14 pages)—Dec. 17, 2015. |
Decision1 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (16 pages)—Jan. 4, 2016. |
Decision2 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (19 pages)—Jan. 4, 2016. |
Decision3 of PTAB declining Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,827 (14 pages)—Jan. 4, 2016. |
Statement of Revocation Grounds re GB2496951—Claimant Rockwool International (May 21, 2018, 22 pages). |
Statement of Revocation Grounds re GB2451719—Claimant Rockwool International (May 18, 2018, 22 pages). |
File Wrapper re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Part 1 (10 pages). |
File Wrapper re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Part 2 (14 pages). |
File Wrapper re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Part 3 (14 pages). |
Gogek Attorney Comments re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Apr. 6, 1960 (3 pages). |
Gogek Affidavit Under Rule 132 re U.S. Pat. No. 2,965,504—Feb. 26, 1960 (3 pages). |
Decision of PTAB denying Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,926,464 (29 pages)—Oct. 2, 2018. |
Decision of PTAB denying Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,464,207 (28 pages)—Oct. 2, 2018. |
Decision of PTAB denying Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,469,747 (29 pages)—Oct. 3, 2018. |
Decision of PTAB denying Institution of Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,828,287 (22 pages)—Oct. 16, 2018. |
Expert Report re Revocation of GB2451719 and GB2496951—Claimant Rockwool International (Nov. 12, 2018, 11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170106561 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14422104 | US | |
Child | 15333670 | US |