U.S. design patent application No. 29314172 filed Mar. 10, 2009.
None
One very useful embodiment of the Invention relates to the following field, although the Invention may also relate to other fields and uses. The Invention may have various embodiments and variations. One aspect of the Invention is as a light pole.
Typical of the art related to the more widely useful embodiments of the present Invention are following patents. The following examples of related art and its limitations are illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon study of the specification and drawings of this application. Other embodiments of the Invention may relate to other arts and uses. U.S. Pat. No. 3,713,262, Jan. 30, 1973 to Jatcko, discloses a tapered lock break-away pole. U.S. Pat. No. 3,746,776, Jul. 17, 1973 to Monahan et al. discloses a resin coated wooden pole and light standard. U.S. Design Pat. No. D496, 120 S, Sep. 14, 2004 to Cooper et al. discloses a light pole.
One of the more widely useful embodiments of the present Invention may be summarized as follows. This embodiment is exemplary only. Other embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon study of the specification and drawings of this application. Other embodiments of the Invention may relate to other arts and have usefulness in those arts.
The present invention relates generally to exterior light poles, and more particularly, to a hybrid laminated wood pole that has an aluminum base plate, for anchoring and wiring, and an upper pole section that is laminated wood for supporting a luminaire assembly. Lighting poles are generally made of steel, aluminum or composite materials. These are hollow tubes that provide for an internal electrical wireway, as well as a means of support and mounting the lighting fixture assembly, which may include multiple lighting fixtures. Utility or telephone poles, used mainly for overhead electrical transmission and or communication transmission, can also have lighting fixtures attached to the pole for illumination purposes. Wood utility poles are one continuous, solid wood structure, typically embedded in the ground as a means of mounting.
There are several problems and drawbacks associated with using conventional wood poles when used in a non-utility application such as architectural site lighting, where a lighting assembly will be attached on the top of the pole and connected to an electrical circuit:
a. Utility or telephone transmission poles are typically directly buried in the ground, below grade level, rather than attached to a concrete foundation, at or above grade level, via anchoring bolts. Installing and removing direct embedded wood poles is fairly simple when placed in a open area of soil such as along a roadway. Installing embedded poles in an area with finished grade materials such as concrete, paving stones, landscapes, etc. makes it more complicated and expensive to install and remove the poles. Attaching a pole to a concrete foundation with anchoring bolts is the preferred method of installing a conventional steel or aluminum pole in an area with finished grade materials.
b. Direct buried wood poles are typically coated with a combination of chemicals to retard rotting of the wood, that is below grade, due to moisture, insects and chemicals contained in the soil substrate. These chemicals, some of which are toxic, will leach into the surrounding soil over time.
c. Conventional solid wood poles have no means of internally bringing electrical wires from the base of the pole to the top of the pole. Conduit is necessary to be run alongside the wood pole to encase the electrical wires vertically up the pole. The various embodiments of the present invention address these issues.
The invention may have various embodiments and variations and may be useful in different fields and for different purposes. The purposes and advantages of the more widely useful embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, the following, and may include other purposes and advantages in different fields of use not listed herein:
1. To provide a decorative wood hybrid pole used for exterior lighting applications where the visual vocabulary of wood is preferable to a metal pole. The wood hybrid pole can be finished in various wood colors as specified by the user.
2. To provide an internal wireway in the center of the pole for bringing the electrical wires from the base of the pole, at grade level, to the top of the pole.
3. To construct the pole of a laminated wood structure, instead of a single piece of wood used in a wood utility or telephone pole. A laminated wood structure is stronger in compression and under a load than a single piece of homogenous wood.
4. To provide a pole base plate for attaching to a foundation, using conventional anchor bolts, which installs like a metal pole.
5. To provide a pole top tenon for attaching a luminaire, or luminaire and arm assembly, on the top of the pole.
6. To provide that the wood pole is constructed of Alaskan Yellow Cedar wood which is naturally impervious to the intrusion of moisture and insects, without the use of chemical treatments, to avoid deterioration, decay or rotting due to insects and moisture.
The main pole shaft comprises a hollow, laminated wood structure. The laminations are arranged to maximize the strength of the pole shaft when the individual laminations are adhered to each other. The base of the pole is cast aluminum. The base includes four openings for attaching the pole to the foundation with anchor bolts and associated hardware.
7. To provide in the base of the pole, an electrical wiring compartment that complies with the 2008 National Electrical Code requirements for wiring compartments. This will allow connections between the load power source and the lighting fixture or other electrical device on the top of the pole.
8. To provide an integral electrical wiring compartment in the base, as well as the anchor, bolts, which are covered by a gasketed, watertight cover to preclude the intrusion of water and dirt into the base area of the pole.
9. To provide a structure where the wood shaft slips into the outer aluminum base tube section.
This Brief Description and the Detailed Description Of The Drawings cover only some embodiments of the Invention, and other embodiments will be clear to those skilled in the art from the description, drawings, and Alternative and Additional Embodiments, etc.
The Drawings are illustrative and not limiting.
The preceding description is the embodiment presently preferred by the Inventor, but over time other embodiments and uses in other areas may become preferred to those skilled in the art. The materials for the pole, apart from the wood, could be various metals or perhaps certain strong plastics. The dimensions could vary based on aesthetic appearance, and the height could vary based on installation location and lighting requirements.
The hybrid pole was tested for failure under load using the static load testing method, measuring the load with a dynamometer. The test method was per ASTM 136.20. Multiple poles were tested until failure. Failure occurred at 1205 to 1210 pounds. This compares favorably to high strength composite poles that fail at 300 to 400 pounds using identical testing methods. The testing was conducted on Dec. 8, 2008. The test data was inputted into a “load” program to determine the acceptable wind loading of the pole under various conditions. This is the standard method of determining the maximum weight and EPA (effective projected area) of luminaires and arms that can be attached to the top of the pole under specific wind conditions.
Other species of wood can be used to form the wood shaft, although most types of wood, such as Douglas Fir, pine, oak, etc. require chemical treatment to protect the wood from water and insect damage. Hardwoods such a teak and ipe, which are resistant to water and insect damage, do not accept adhesives well and are prone to failure at the glue joints.
An alternative method of installing the pole would be a direct embedment whereas the pole extends below the finished grade. The pole base would be constructed of stainless steel instead of aluminum to resist corrosion on the portion of the base that is below grade, and in direct contact with soil.
The wood shaft can be attached to the base by means of mechanical attachments such as screws or bolts as opposed to using a structural adhesive. Mechanical attachments are prone to long term failure due to the natural occurrence of pole vibration due to the wind which will enlarge the mounting holes.
The wood shaft 200 and the vertical portion 301 of the anchor base 300 can be produced as a square shape in cross section rather than round as shown in the drawings.
A number of changes are possible to the parts described above while still remaining within the scope and spirit of the Invention. The specifics about the form and use of the Invention described in this application (including the specifics in the Summary, Abstract, Preferred Embodiment, Additional Embodiments, and Alternative Embodiments, etc.) are examples and are not intended to be limiting in scope. Those skilled in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions, subtractions and sub-combinations thereof, and may discover new fields of use. The scope of the Invention is to be determined by the claims and their legal equivalents, not the examples, purposes, summary, preferred embodiments, alternative or additional embodiments, operation, tests, parameters, or limitations etc. given above. It is intended that the claims are interpreted to include all such modifications, additions, subtractions, permutations and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope, including those which may be recognized later by those skilled in the art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
589836 | Koll | Sep 1897 | A |
730789 | Neill | Jun 1903 | A |
1555945 | Cuttle | Oct 1925 | A |
1589528 | Hayes | Jun 1926 | A |
1903907 | Riemenschneider | Apr 1933 | A |
1972187 | Famam | Sep 1934 | A |
3270480 | Beecker | Sep 1966 | A |
3360601 | Rosenberg | Dec 1967 | A |
3400905 | Van Dusen, Jr. | Sep 1968 | A |
3713262 | Jatcko | Jan 1973 | A |
3745331 | Dennis | Jul 1973 | A |
3746776 | Monahan | Jul 1973 | A |
4033080 | Fukushima | Jul 1977 | A |
4154037 | Anderson | May 1979 | A |
4468273 | Eklund | Aug 1984 | A |
4779389 | Landers | Oct 1988 | A |
5133164 | Legler | Jul 1992 | A |
5438812 | Erickson | Aug 1995 | A |
5746031 | Burns | May 1998 | A |
5954426 | Whittington | Sep 1999 | A |
5987845 | Laronde | Nov 1999 | A |
6006479 | Fayle | Dec 1999 | A |
6141928 | Platt | Nov 2000 | A |
6446408 | Gordin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468003 | Merjan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
D496120 | Cooper | Sep 2004 | S |
7090382 | Haddad et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7490964 | Haddad et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7533506 | Platt | May 2009 | B2 |
20040154262 | Jaroff | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060185874 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080271396 | Burke | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090145994 | Dunn | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100281791 | Intagliata et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
878997 | Jan 2009 | KR |
Entry |
---|
English Abstract of KR 87899 B1 to Haing. |
4 pages of printouts from www.aubrilam.com. |