Patent Application
20080081709
An embodiment of the present invention will be explained below with reference to
The term “standard state” of a golf club head as used herein denotes the state that golf club head 1 is placed on a horizontal plane HP in the state that an axial center line CL of a shaft is disposed in an optional vertical plane VP and is inclined at a lie angle given to the head 1 with respect to the horizontal plane HP, and a hitting face 2 is inclined at a loft angle (real loft angle, herein after the same) given to the head 1. The head 1 referred to herein is in the standard state unless otherwise noted.
Further, with respect to the club head 1, the up-and-down direction and the height direction denote those of the club head 1 in the standard state. The front-and-rear direction denotes, when the club head 1 in the standard state is viewed from above, namely in a plane view of the head 1 (
The golf club head 1 includes a face portion 3 having a face 2 for hitting a golf ball on its front side, a crown portion 4 which extends from the upper edge 2a of the hitting face 2 and forming the upper surface of the head 1, a sole portion 5 which extends from the lower edge 2b of the hitting face 2 and forming the bottom surface of the head 1, a side portion 6 which extends between the crown portion 4 and the sole portion 5 from a toe side edge 2c of the face 2 to a heel side edge 2d of the face 2 through a back face BF of the head 1, and a hosel portion 7 which is disposed on a heel side of the crown portion 5 and has a shaft inserting hole 7a to attach a shaft (not shown). Since the axial center line of the shaft inserting hole 7a substantially agrees with the center line CL of the shaft, it is used as a basis to determine the lie angle.
As shown in
The club head 1 in this embodiment is produced from a metallic material. Preferable examples of the metallic material are, for instance, a stainless steel, a marageing steel, a pure titanium, a titanium alloy, an aluminum allow, and combinations of these metals. Fiber-reinforced plastics may be used in a part of the head 1.
The club head 1 in this embodiment has, as shown in
The volume of the club head 1 is not particularly limited. In view of the object of the present invention of increasing the moment of inertia, the volume of the head is preferably at least 360 cm3, more preferably at least 380 cm3. On the other hand, if the volume is too large, the resulting golf club head will not meet golf rules or the durability is deteriorated since the increase in volume of the head must be made within a limited weight range. From such a point of view, the volume of head 1 is preferably at most 470 cm3, more preferably at most 460 cm3.
In consideration of swing balance or the like, the weight of head 1 is preferably at least 170 g, more preferably at least 180 g, and is preferably at most 250 g, more preferably at most 240 g. In particular, in case of a driver head, the head 1 is preferred to have a weight of 200 g or less.
When viewed from above as a plane view of the head in the standard state as shown in
As shown in
The thick wall portion 9 comprises a crown thick wall portion 9c which forms a part of the crown portion 4 and has a thickness “tac” of 1.2 to 2.0 mm, and a side thick wall portion 9s which is continuous with the crown thick wall portion 9c to form a part of the side portion 6 and has a thickness “tas” of 1.2 to 3.0 mm. In other words, the thick wall portion 9 includes the head contour line OL and is located above and below the head contour line OL.
Such a thick wall portion 9 can distribute a larger weight to the head periphery region Ao by a simple structure. Also, it does not require a special structure like a supporting means or the like as required when separately preparing a weight member and attaching it to a club head. Thus, the weight can be efficiently distributed to the head periphery region Ao and, therefore, the moment of inertia of the club head 1 can be increased to stabilize the flight direction performance.
The thick wall portion 9 in this embodiment is produced by casting. That is to say, the thick wall portion 9 is simultaneously formed when forming the head body 1A by casting. Therefore, the thick wall portion 9 can be formed with good size precision such as thickness and width without lowering the productivity. This is advantageous as compared with attachment of a separately prepared weight member, since deterioration in productivity can be more surely prevented.
The entire of the side portion 6 may be formed thick as a thick wall portion 9. However, in such an embodiment, a rigidity difference is easy to generate in the vicinity of a boundary portion (i.e., head contour line OL) between the side portion 6 and the crown portion 4. Therefore, in such a case, a stress generated when striking a ball is easy to concentrate on the boundary portion, whereby the durability of head 1 is impaired. In contrast, in case of an embodiment as shown in
If the thickness tac of the crown thick wall portion 9c is less than 1.2 mm, the weight is not sufficiently allocated to the head periphery region Ao and, therefore, the effect of increasing the moment of inertia of the head is not obtained. On the other hand, if the thickness tac of the crown thick wall portion 9c is more than 2.0 mm, the weight of a head upper portion is apt to increase to raise the position of the center of gravity G. Such a club head tends to increase the back spin amount and, therefore, loss of flight distance may occur. From such points of view, the thickness tac of the crown thick wall portion 9c is preferably 1.5 mm or more, and is preferably 1.8 mm or less.
Similarly, if the thickness tas of the side thick wall portion 9s is less than 1.2 mm, the weight is not sufficiently distributed to the head periphery region Ao and, therefore, the effect of increasing the moment of inertia of the head is not obtained. On the other hand, if the thickness tas of the side thick wall portion 9s is more than 3.0 mm, pin holes are easy to generate when the head is produced by casting. From such points of view, the thickness tas of the side thick wall portion 9s is preferably 1.5 mm or more, more preferably 1.7 mm or more, the most preferably 2.0 mm or more, and is preferably 2.8 mm or less, more preferably 2.5 mm or less.
The side thick wall portion 9s also serves to lower the center of gravity location. Therefore, it is more preferable to make the thickness tas of the side thick wall portion 9s larger than the thickness tac of the crown thick wall portion 9c so as to achieve a low center of gravity with increasing the moment of inertia. In that case, it is also preferable to form the entire thick wall portion 9 so that the thickness gradually and smoothly increases from the crown thick wall portion 9c toward the side thick wall portion 9s.
In order to exhibit both the effect of lowering the center of gravity location and the effect of increasing the moment of inertia in good balance, it is preferable that the difference (tas-tac) between the thickness tas of the side thick wall portion 9s and the thickness tac of the crown thick wall portion 9c is at least 0.5 mm, especially at least 0.7 mm, and is at most 2.0 mm, especially at most 1.5 mm.
Further, in a vertical section passing through the center of gravity G of the head (
For exhibiting both the effect of increasing the moment of inertia and the effect of reinforcing a neighborhood of the head contour line OL in good balance, it is preferable that the width Wc along the head outer surface of the crown thick wall portion 9c is at least 2 mm, especially at least 4 mm, and is at most 10 mm, especially at most 8 mm, more especially at most 6 mm. Similarly, it is preferable that the width Ws along the head outer surface of the side thick wall portion 9s is at least 3 mm, especially at least 5 mm, and is at most 14 mm, especially at most 10 mm, more especially at most 8 mm.
In particular, it is preferable in maintaining a low center of gravity of the head 1 that the width Ws of the side thick wall portion 9s is larger than the width Wc of the crown thick wall portion 9c. It is particularly preferable that a difference “Ws−Wc” between the width Ws of the side thick wall portion 9s and the width Wc of the crown thick wall portion 9 is 1 mm or more, especially 2 mm or more. On the other hand, if the difference “Ws−Wc” is too large, there is a possibility that the durability of the thick wall portion 9 is lowered. Therefore, preferably the difference “Ws−Wc” is 6 mm or less, especially 4 mm or less.
A thin wall portion 4u having a thickness “tuc” of 0.4 to 1.0 mm is disposed in the crown portion 4 with being contiguous to the crown thick wall portion 9c. In this embodiment as shown in
Similarly, a thin wall portion 6u having a thickness “tus” of 0.4 to 1.0 mm is disposed in the side portion 6 with being contiguous to the side thick wall portion 9s. In this embodiment as shown in
Since the weight of the crown and side portions is decreased by thinning the wall thickness thereof, these thin wall portions 4u and 6u may provide a new weight margin enabling to form the thick wall portion 9 having a larger thickness so as to further increase the moment of inertia.
If the thickness “tuc” or “tus” of the thin wall portion 4u or 6u is less than 0.4 mm, the crown portion 4 or side portion 6 is short of strength and the durability of the club head is remarkably deteriorated. Further, since the molten metal is hard to flow in these portions when conducting the casting, molding failure may occur. Therefore, the thickness “tuc” and “tus” is preferably at least 0.5 mm, more preferably at least 0.6 mm. On the other hand, if the thickness “tuc” or “tus” is more than 1.0 mm, no effective weight margin utilizable for increasing the moment of inertia is obtained from the crown portion 4 or side portion 6. In particular, in case that the thickness of the thin wall portion 4u of the crown portion 4 exceeds 1.0 mm, the weight of a head upper portion becomes large, so the location of the head center of gravity tends to be high. Therefore, the thickness “tuc” and “tus” is preferably at most 0.9 mm, more preferably at most 0.8 mm.
From the viewpoint of lowering the location of the head center of gravity G, it is preferable that the thickness “tus” of the thin wall portion 6u of the side portion 6 is larger than the thickness “tuc” of the thin wall portion 4u of the crown portion 4. In particular, from the viewpoint of effective weight distribution to realize a low center of gravity and a good strength balance, a thickness difference “tus-tuc” is preferably at least 0.05 mm, more preferably at least 0.1 mm, the most preferably at least 0.2 mm, and is preferably at most 1.0 mm, more preferably at most 0.5 mm.
Further, in the crown portion 4, it is preferable that the ratio of the thickness tac of the crown thick wall portion 9c to the thickness tuc of the thin wall portion 4u of the crown portion 4 (tac/tuc ratio) is at least 2.0, especially at least 2.2, more especially at least 2.4. If the tac/tus ratio is less than 2.0, there is a possibility that a proper weight distribution, namely the effect of increasing the moment of inertia, is not sufficiently achieved. On the other hand, if the tac/tus ratio is too large, there is a possibility that the casting formability is lowered or a stress concentrates on a boundary portion between the thick and thin wall portions to deteriorate the durability. From such points of view, it is preferable that the tac/tus ratio is at most 3.0, especially at most 2.8, more especially at most 2.6.
Similarly, in the side portion 6, it is preferable that the ratio of the thickness tas of the side thick wall portion 9s to the thickness tus of the thin wall portion 6u of the side portion 6 (tas/tus ratio) is at least 2.0, especially at least 2.5, more especially at least 3.0, and is at most 4.5, especially at most 3.5.
It is desirable that the thick wall portion 9 is continuous with the thin wall portion 4u or 6u with gradually decreasing its thickness, whereby stress concentration on the boundary portion between the thick wall portion 9 and the thin wall portion 4u or 6u is suppressed to prevent deterioration of the durability of the head.
The thick wall portion 9 has a toe side end 9t and a heel side end 9h and extends between them along the head contour line OL. In this embodiment, the thick wall portion 9 extends to include an extreme back end point BFP which is located at the farthest backward position of the head. Such a thick wall portion 9 can allocate the weight to a more backward position to effectively increase the depth of the center of gravity of the head.
In order to realize a sufficient weight distribution to the head periphery region Ao, it is preferable that the length L of the thick wall portion 9 measured from the toe side end 9t to the heel side end 9h along the contour line OL of the head in the standard state when viewed from above as a plane view as shown in
When the head 1 in the standard state is viewed from above as a plane view as shown in
While preferable embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to the drawings, it goes without saying that the present invention is not limited to only such embodiments and various changes and modifications may be made.
The present invention is more specifically described and explained by means of the following Examples and Comparative Examples. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to these Examples.
Two piece wood-type golf club heads having a base structure as shown in
Loft angle: 11.0°
Lie angle: 58.0°
Head volume: 460 cm3
Head weight: 195 g
Material of head body: Ti-6Al-4V (lost-wax casting product)
Material of face member: Ti-6Al-4V (rolling product)
The testing methods are as follows:
The coefficient of restitution was measured according to the USGA Procedure for Measuring the Velocity Ratio of a Club Head for Conformance to Rule 4-1e, Revision 2, Feb. 8, 1999. The measurement was repeated 10 times for each head, and the average value thereof is shown in Table 1. The larger the value, the better, but the value must be less than 0.83° in order to satisfy the golf rules such as the USGA Golf Rules.
The same FRP shafts were attached to all heads to be tested to give wood gold clubs having a full length of 46 inches. Ten right-hitting amateur golfers (handicap 10 to 20) struck 10 balls with each club, and there were measured the flight distance and the amount (yard) of swerve to the right or left of the stopping position of a struck ball with respect to the target direction of striking (the amount of swerve is shown by a positive value for the both cases of swerving to the right and the left). Each of the results of measurement of the flight distance and the amount of swerve shown in Table 1 is the average of found values obtained by striking 100 balls for each club. The larger the value, the better the flight distance performance. The smaller the value, the better the direction performance.
The length of the perpendicular line N connecting the center of gravity G and the sweet spot SS was measured. The larger the value, the better.
The moment of inertia about a vertical axis passing through the center of gravity of the golf club head was measured using Moment of Inertia Measuring Instrument Model No. 005-002 made by INERTIA DYNAMICS INC. The larger the value, the better.
A same shaft made of an FRP was attached to each of the golf club heads to give a 45 inch wood-type golf club. Each of five golfers having a handicap of 5 to 15 hit ten golf balls with each golf club to measure the amount of swerve from the intended target course to the stop position of the ball.
3a. Amount of Rightward or Leftward Swerve
The amount of rightward or leftward swerve was calculated according to the following equation:
wherein A1, A2 . . . An (n=10) each is an amount (yard) of swerve of the stop position of the ball hit from the target flight course. The smaller the value, the better the direction performance.
3b. Amount of Frontward or Rearward Swerve
The amount of frontward or rearward swerve was calculated according to the following equation:
wherein B1, B2 . . . Bn (n=10) each is a flight distance for each hitting, and Ba is an average flight distance. The smaller the value, the better the direction performance.
Test results are shown in Table 1.
From the results shown in Table 1, it is confirmed that golf club heads of the Examples according to the present invention have a large moment of inertia and the amount of rightward or leftward swerve in hitting direction is suppressed small. It is also confirmed that since the depth of the center of gravity can be made large according to the present invention, the amount of frontward or rearward swerve is small in the golf club heads of the Examples.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-265416 | Sep 2006 | JP | national |
