The present invention relates to a wood-type golf club head.
Recent years, wood-type golf clubs are increased in the head volume, and a hollow club head having a head volume over 350 cc is not yet uncommon.
In designing such large-sized heads, heretofore, as the head volume increases, the area of the club face is also increased almost in proportion thereto. And although the head volume is increased, the head is maintained at the almost same weight not to alter swing balance. Accordingly, the material thickness is decreased excepting the face portion because the face portion is required to have a sufficient strength and durability against impact. In other words, according to general design concepts until now, as the head volume increases, the head increases wholly including the club face.
When the area of the club face is increased, the deflection of the face portion at impact tends to increase, and accordingly, in order to provide the face portion with durability, it becomes necessary for the face portion to keep a relatively large thickness. As a result, in order to maintain the overall head weight, the portion other than the face portion has to be decreased in the thickness, and the durability is deteriorated.
Further, in view of the weight distribution design, it becomes difficult to control the position of the center of gravity of the head because the weight margin available for adjusting the distribution is reduced.
It is therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a wood-type golf club head, in which, although a large head volume, the weight margin can be increased without deteriorating the durability and other performance.
According to the present invention a wood-type golf club head has a head volume V (cc) of not less than 350 cc and comprises a face portion of which front surface defines a club face for hitting a ball, wherein the area S (sq.cm) of the club face is not less than 30 sq.cm and not more than V×0.08+5. Preferably, the weight of the face portion is in a range of from 20 to 40% of the overall weight of the club head. The overall weight is preferably in a range of from 150 to 210 grams.
Therefore, the area of the club face is limited to smaller values in relation to the head volume when compared with the usual large-sized heads. As a result, the face portion can be provided with a sufficient durability without increasing the thickness, whereby the increase in the weight of the face portion can be avoided and a large weight margin is available.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, wood-type hollow golf club head 1 according to the present invention comprises: a face portion 3 whose front face defines a club face 2 for hitting a ball; a crown portion 4 intersecting the club face 2 at the upper edge 2a thereof; a sole portion 5 intersecting the club face 2 at the lower edge 2b thereof; a side portion 6 between the crown portion 4 and sole portion 5 which extends from a toe-side edge 2c to a heel-side edge 2d of the club face 2 through the back face of the club head; and a hosel portion 7 protruding upward from the crown portion 4 and provided at the upper end thereof with a shaft inserting hole 7a to be attached to an end of a club shaft (not shown).
Here, the standard state is defined such that, as shown in
The club head 1 is made of one or more metal materials, e.g. aluminum alloy, pure titanium, titanium alloy, stainless steel, maraging steel and the like. But, it is also possible to use, in combination with such metal material(s), a further material having a relatively low specific gravity, e.g. magnesium alloy, fiber reinforced resin and the like.
In this embodiment, the club head 1 is composed of a face plate 1B, and a head main body 1A provided at the front with an opening O in which the face plate 1B is fitted. The face plate 1B and head main body 1A are each made of a metal material and welded each other. Aside from such two-piece structure, it is also possible to employ a three- or four- or more piece structure wherein each piece or part is formed by casting, forging, pressing, rolling or the like. In other words, the head main body 1A can be a single-piece part or a two- or more piece part.
As the present invention is intended to provide a large-sized head which is improved in the durability and increased in the degree of freedom of the weight distribution design, the head volume V of the club head is set in a range of not less than 350 cc, but the upper limit is 460 cc when complying the regulations of USGA and R&A. Thus, the present invention is preferably applied to the club heads having a head volume V of more than 360 cc, more preferably more than 400 cc, but less than 500 cc. The head volume V is an apparent volume including the volume of the shaft inserting hole 7a, the hollow (i) and the like.
According to the present invention, the area S of the club face 2 (hereinafter the “club face area”) is decreased. But, in view of the variation of the ball hit positions on the club face, especially wide variations of amateur golfers, and the player's feeling in address position, the club face area S is at least 30 sq.cm, preferably more than 31 sq.cm, more preferably more than 33 sq.cm.
Here, the club face area S is the area defined by the edge E of the club face 2 consisting of the upper edge 2a, lower edge 2b, toe-side edge 2c and heel-side edge 2d, and measured, excluding dents and protrusions such as face grooves, punch mark and the like.
If the edge E is unclear due to smooth change in the curvature, a virtual edge line (Pe) which is defined, based on the curvature change is used instead as follows. As shown in
In view of the rebound characteristic, it is preferable that the height H of the club face 2 is set in a range of not less than 35 mm, preferably more than 38 mm, more preferably more than 40 mm, but in view of the primary object of the invention, not more than 60 mm, preferably less than 57 mm, more preferably less than 55 mm.
Here, the height H is, as shown in
Further, the width W of the club face 2 is set in a range of not more than 110 mm, preferably less than 105 mm in view of the primary object, but not less than 70 mm, preferably more than 75 mm, more preferably more than 80 mm to reduce miss shots. The width W is, as shown in
According to the present invention, the club face area S (sq.cm), and the head volume V(cc) are determined to satisfy the following condition (1), preferably (2), more preferably (3):
S≦0.08×V+5 (1)
S≦0.08×V+4 (2)
S≦0.08×V+2 (3)
However, if the numeric value (S−0.08×V) becomes too small, as the club face area S becomes small for the head volume V, miss shots tends to increase. Therefore, it is desirable that the following condition (4) is satisfied.
0.08×V−6≦S (4)
By the above-mentioned conditional expression (1), (2) or (3), the maximum value of the club face area S is limited in relation to the volume V. This is however, not always meant to vary the club face area S in proportion to the head volume in designing the head. For example, in a specific range of the head volume, the club face area S may be set at almost constant values or within a very narrow range as far as the above-mentioned conditions are satisfied.
At any rate, the numerical value of the club face area S may be set in a range of not more than 45 sq.cm, more preferably less than 43 sq.cm, still more preferably less than 40 sq.cm.
Preferably, the weight of the face portion 3 (hereinafter the “face portion weight”) is set in a range of not less than 20%, more preferably more than 22%, still more preferably more than 24%, but not more than 40%, more preferably less than 35%, still more preferably less than 30%, yet still more preferably less than 28% of the overall weight of the club head. Here, to determine the weight of the face portion 3, the face portion 3 is defined as a volume which is as shown in
If the face portion weight is less than 20% of the overall weight, it becomes difficult to provide a club face area of more than 30 sq.cm, while maintaining the required durability at the same time. If more than 40%, it becomes necessary to decrease the thickness in the portions other than the face portion 3 and as a result, the durability is liable to decrease.
If the club head is too light, the rebound characteristic of the head tends to decrease and there is a tendency for the golfers to feel something wrong during swing. If the club head is too heavy, the directional stability tends to deteriorate and the traveling distance of the ball tends to decrease. Therefore, the overall weight of the club head is preferably set in a range of not less than 150 grams, more preferably more than 170 grams, still more preferably more than 190 grams, but not more than 220 grams, more preferably less than 215 grams, still more preferably less than 210 grams.
If the thickness of the face portion 3 is too large, as the weight of the face portion 3 increases, there is a tendency that the weight margin decreases and the rebound characteristic of the face deteriorates. If the thickness is too small, it is difficult to provide a sufficient durability. Therefore, the average thickness (t) of the face portion 3 is preferably set in a range of not less than 1.0 mm, more preferably more than 1.5 mm, still more preferably more than 2.5 mm, but not more than 4.0 mm, more preferably less than 3.5 mm, still more preferably less than 3.0 mm. Here, the average thickness means the area weighted average thickness. Given that the objective part is made up of small regions i (i=1, 2 - - - n) each having a thickness ti and area Si, the average thickness is Σ(ti×Si)/ΣS (i=1, 2 - - - n) Thus, the average thickness may be regarded as the volume of the objective part divided by the total area (S=ΣSi).
When the face portion 3 has a variable thickness, the minimum thickness is not less than 1.05 mm, preferably more than 1.5 mm, more preferably more than 1.8 mm, still more preferably more than 2.0 mm, yet still more preferably more than 2.5 mm.
If the ratio (t/S) of the average thickness (t) to the club face area S is decreased, the face portion 3 tends to decrease in the durability. If the ratio (t/S) is too large, the rebound characteristic is deteriorated to decrease the traveling distance of the ball. Therefore, the ratio t(cm)/S(sq.cm) is set in a range of not less than 0.060, preferably more than 0.065, more preferably more than 0.068, but not more than 0.150, preferably less than 0.100, more preferably less than 0.090.
To decrease or adjust the club face area S, the curvature of the outer surface of the head can be increased (namely, the radius (Rt, Rc, Rs) of curvature can be decreased) in a specific zone (L1, L2, L3) which is defined as extending backward from the above-mentioned club face edge E. In such zone (L1, L2, L3), the outer surface is curved so as to smoothly merge into the club face 2. For this purpose, the radius (Rt, Rc, Rs) of curvature is progressively decreased towards the club face 2. In the front-and-back direction, the zone (L1, L2, L3) extends backwards from the edge E for 30 to 60 mm. Such a zone can be provided in at least one of the crown portion 4, sole portion 5 and side portion 6 as shown in
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
According to the above constructions, a large weight margin can be acquired, and the weight margin is utilized to increase the thickness in the crown portion 4, sole portion 5 and/or side portion 6 and/or to add a separate weight member larger in the specific gravity than the head main body 1A.
For the weight member, materials having a specific gravity of not less than 7.5 can be suitably used. Specifically, it is preferable that the weight is not less than 1 grams, more preferably more than 3 grams, still more preferably more than 5 grams, but not more than 40 grams, more preferably less than 35 grams, still more preferably less than 30 grams.
Then the club head 1 is attached to a club shaft to make a wood-type golf club having a length in the range of from 45 to 48 inches.
Comparison Tests
Hollow metal wood-type heads for driver (head volume 360 cc and 460 cc, loft angle 10 degrees, hook angle 4 degrees) were made and tested as follows.
The heads were, as shown in
The specifications are shown in Table 1.
The weights of the club heads were measured, and differences from Ref.A1, B1 are shown in Table 1.
Each head was attached to an identical FRP shaft to make a 45-inch driver, and ten testers each hit balls 20 times per a club, and the number of miss shots was counted. To determine the ball hit positions on the head, a pressure-sensitive paper was applied to the club face (the paper was replaced every 5 time hitting), and the number of shots of which impact marks were wholly or partially outside the club face was counted. In order to minimize the influence of the testers' ability, the ten testers were grouped into a first group of five golfers whose handicap ranged from 30 to 40, and a second group of five golfers whose handicap ranged from 10 to 20.
The test results are shown in Table 1.
Durability Test:
Each club was mounted on a swing robot. Then, at the head speed of 51 meter/second, the head hit two-piece golf balls 3000 times. After such 3000-time hitting test, the face portion and the junction of the face plate and head main body were checked. The results are shown in Table 1, wherein “A” means that no damage was found, and “B” means that damage was found.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-141523 | May 2005 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6354962 | Galloway et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402639 | Iwata et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6471604 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6875129 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7318781 | Deshmukh | Jan 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8-126723 | May 1996 | JP |
2001-37924 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2004188190 | Jul 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060258481 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |