The present invention relates to a wood-type golf club head having an improved flight direction performance for hit ball.
In order to improve the flight direction performance of a wood-type golf club head, it is proposed to increase the moment of inertia (to be exact, the moment of inertia of a club head about the vertical axis passing through the center of gravity of the club head). That is to say, a gear effect produced by off-center hit that a golf ball has hit a club head outside a sweet spot of the club head, for example, near the toe or heel of the club head, is suppressed by increasing the moment of inertia, whereby the side spin amount of the struck golf ball is decreased to stabilize the direction performance.
The gear effect produced when hitting a golf ball by a right-handed golfer is briefly explained below (all explanations made herein being for right-handed golfers). For example, if a golf ball “b” is struck by a club head “a” at a position on the toe side of the club face as shown in
In order to improve the directionality for the hit ball, it is also proposed to make the depth of the center of gravity small, as disclosed in JP 9-140836 A and U.S. Pat. No. 6,913,546 B2. The depth of the center of gravity is a horizontal length between the center of gravity of the head and the sweet spot on the face of the head in the front-rear direction of the head. The moment rotating the club head around the center of gravity on an off-center hit increases as the depth of the center of gravity increases. Therefore, if the depth of the center of gravity is large, the gear effect becomes large and the side spin amount of the hit ball tends to increase. In improving the directionality of hit ball by suppressing the gear effect, it is desirable to decrease the depth of the center of gravity.
In JP 9-140836 A, it is proposed to decrease the depth of the center of gravity by thickening the face portion of the head. However, a thick face portion may deteriorate the repellency of the face portion to reduce the flight distance of ball. Further, since the proposed club head has a volume of 220 to 320 cm3, it is inferred that the moment of inertia of the head is small and, of course, no consideration is given to a relationship between the depth of the center of gravity and the moment of inertia.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,913,546 B2, it is proposed to decrease the depth of the center of gravity by using a metallic material having a high specific gravity as a material for preparing the face portion of the head. However, the use of a metallic material having a high specific gravity has a limit in increasing the head volume and, for example, it is difficult to produce club heads having a volume of 420 cm3 or more. Further, since the face portion is heavy, it is required for increasing the moment of inertia to dispose a heavier material at a peripheral portion of the head, whereby the head weight becomes too large, so the head speed during the swing is lowered and it becomes difficult to perform the swing to impair the directional stability.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a wood-type golf club head having an improved directional stability without lowering the flight distance of hit ball.
This and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from the description hereinafter.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a hollow wood-type golf club head comprising a face portion having a hitting face for hitting a golf ball on its front side, and having a head volume of 420 to 500 cm3, wherein:
the face portion is made of a metallic material having a specific gravity of 4.30 to 4.60 and has a thickness of 1.5 to 4.0 mm,
in the standard state that the club head is placed on a horizontal plane at prescribed lie and loft angles, the X/Y ratio is 0.0070 or less in which X is the depth (mm) of the center of gravity of the club head which is a horizontal length between the center of gravity and a sweet spot on the hitting face in the front-rear direction of the club head, and Y is the moment of inertia (g·cm2) of the club head about the vertical axis passing through the center of gravity, and
the fitting face is convexly curved such that an intersection line of the fitting face and a horizontal plane including the sweet spot is convex toward the front of the head, and the radius of curvature Rc of the convex intersection line is from 330.2 to 457.2 mm.
Preferably, the face progression of the club head is from 10 to 22 mm.
Preferably, the hitting face is a multi-radius face such that the radius of curvature on the heel side of the above-mentioned intersection line (i.e., horizontal face bulge) is larger than the radius of curvature on the toe side of the intersection line.
In a preferable embodiment, the club head comprises a head body and a face member which constitutes a main part of the face portion and is fixed to the head body, in which the face member is produced from a first titanium alloy and the head body is produced from a second titanium alloy having a larger specific gravity than that of the first titanium alloy.
Preferably, the first titanium alloy has a Young's modulus of 120 to 150 GPa and a tensile strength of 950 to 2,200 MPa. A preferable first titanium alloy is a Ti—Al—Fe alloy containing 4.5 to 5.5% by weight of aluminum, 0.5 to 1.5% by weight of iron, and the remaining amount of titanium and unavoidable impurities.
In the wood-type golf club heads of the present invention, the face portion is formed to have a specific gravity and a thickness within specified ranges as mentioned above. Therefore, the club heads can be prepared to have a large head volume while preventing deterioration of the repellency of the face portion. This is effective for increasing the moment of inertia to thereby stabilize the flight direction performance. In the present invention, the X/Y ratio of the depth X (mm) of the center of gravity to the moment of inertia Y (g·cm2) about the vertical axis passing through the center of gravity is set to suppress the gear effect and, therefore, the amount of side spin imparted to a ball by off-center hit can be decreased to improve the directional stability for hit ball.
Rotation of the club head on an off-center hit opens or closes the face of the club head and causes the ball to fly initially to the right or left of the intended line of flight, and the hook or slice spin imparted by the gear effect causes the ball to curve back toward the intended line of flight. Usually the gear effect spin is excessive and the ball would hook to the left or slice to the right of the intended line of flight. In the present invention, the club head is designed to suppress the side spin amount of hit ball and, therefore, the hitting face of the club head of the present invention is provided with a horizontal bulge having a large radius of curvature.
An embodiment of the present invention will be explained below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The term “standard state” of a golf club head as used herein denotes the state that golf club head 1 is placed on a horizontal plane HP in the state that an axial center line SL of a shaft is disposed in an optional vertical plane VP and is inclined at a lie angle α given to the head 1 with respect to the horizontal plane HP, and a hitting face 2 is inclined at a loft angle β (real loft angle) given to the head 1 (the face angle being set to zero). The head 1 referred to herein is in the standard state unless otherwise noted.
Further, with respect to the club head 1, the up-down direction and the height direction denote those of the club head 1 in the standard state. The front-rear direction denotes, when the head 1 in the standard state is viewed from above, namely in a plane view of the head 1 (
The wood-type golf club head 1 includes a face portion 3 having a face 2 having a smooth curved surface for hitting a golf ball on its front side, a crown portion 4 which extends from the upper edge 2a of the hitting face 2 and forming the upper surface of the head 1, a sole portion 5 which extends from the lower edge 2b of the hitting face 2 and forming the bottom surface of the head 1, a side portion 6 which extends between the crown portion 4 and the sole portion 5 from a toe side edge 2c of the face 2 to a heel side edge 2d of the face 2 through a back face BF of the head 1, and a hosel portion 7 which is disposed on a heel side of the crown portion 5 and has a shaft inserting hole 7a to attach a shaft (not shown). Since the axial center line CL of the shaft inserting hole 7a substantially agrees with the axial center line SL of the shaft, it is used as a basis to determine the lie angle.
As shown in
The weight of the club head 1 is not particularly limited. If the weight is too large, a swing delay is easy to occur, and if the weight is too small, the swing tends to be not stabilized. From such points of view, the weight of the club head 1 is preferably at least 170 g, more preferably at least 175 g, the most preferably at least 180 g, and is also preferably at most 220 g, more preferably at most 210 g, further more preferably at most 200 g, the most preferably at most 190 g.
The club head 1 in this embodiment comprises, as shown in
The face member 1A may be in the form of a plate or may be in a cup-like form or the like. In this embodiment shown in the drawings, the face member 1A is formed into approximately a cup shape comprising a base portion which constitutes substantially the whole region of the face portion 3, and an extension 9 which extends toward the rear of the head from the peripheral edges 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d of the hitting face 2. The base portion of the face member 1A shown in this embodiment forms substantially the whole region of the face portion 3, but may be one constituting a part of the face portion 3. The base portion and the extension 9 are not joined by welding or the like means, but are formed into an integrated body by pressing, casting, forging or the like. Such a face member 1A enables to perform the welding with the head body 1B on a smooth surface like the surface of crown portion 4, sole portion 5 and/or side portion 6, whereby the welding workability can be improved. Further, since a welding joint J between the face member 1A and the head body 1B is located behind the edge of the hitting face 2, the cup-like face member 1A is preferable also from the viewpoint of preventing deterioration in the repellency of the face portion 3.
On the other hand, the head body 1B is formed to include the hosel portion 7 and constitutes a portion behind the welding joint J, namely main portions of the crown portion 4, sole portion 5 and side portion 6. The head body 1B can be produced in a known manner. For example, crown portion 4, sole portion 5, side portion 6 and hosel portion 7 are integrally formed into the head body 1B by casting.
In the present invention, the face portion 3 (in the case of the embodiment shown in the drawings, the face member 1A including face portion 3 and extension 9) is produced from a metallic material having a specific gravity of 4.30 to 4.60. As stated above, it is effective in suppressing the gear effect to make the depth of the center of gravity. From such a point of view, it is known to produce a face portion from a metallic material having a high specific gravity. However, if the specific gravity of the face portion is increased, there arise problems that the moment of inertia about the vertical axis of the club head, which has the highest contribution rate to improvement in direction performance of the club head, decreases and, further, since the position of the center of gravity becomes high, there is a possibility that the flight distance is decreased. For these reasons, in the present invention, the specific gravity of the face portion 3 is defined to 4.60 or less, preferably 4.55 or less, more preferably 4.40 or less, the most preferably 4.38 or less, whereby weight reduction of the face portion is achieved to produce a large weight margin, and the produced weight margin can be applied to suitable portions of the club head in the form of a weight member. Thus, the head volume can be increased with suppressing increase in head weight and, moreover, the moment of inertia about the vertical axis and the depth of the center of gravity can be optimized. On the other hand, if the specific gravity of the face portion 3 is too small, a problem of decrease in strength may arise. Therefore, the specific gravity is set to 4.30 or more.
Examples of the metallic material having a specific gravity of 4.30 to 4.60 are, for instance, titanium alloys such as Ti-6Al-4V (specific gravity 4.42), Ti-3Al-2.5V (specific gravity 4.48), Ti-4.5Al-2Mo-1.6V-0.5Fe-0.3Si-0.03C (trade mark “Ti-9” made by Kobe Steel, Ltd., specific gravity 4.51), Ti-4.5Al-4Cr-0.5Fe-0.2C (trade mark “KS ELF” made by Kobe Steel, Ltd., specific gravity 4.49), Ti-4.5Al-2Cr-1Mo-1.3V-0.5Fe-0.15C (trade mark “KS ELF-II” made by Kobe Steel, Ltd., specific gravity 4.51), Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V-0.15C (trade mark “Ti-811-C” made by Kobe Steel, Ltd., specific gravity 4.37), Ti-4.5Al-3V-2Fe-2Mo (trade mark “SP700” made by JFE Steel Corporation, specific gravity 4.54), Ti-5Al-1Fe (trade mark “Super TIX51AF” made by Nippon Steel Corporation, specific gravity 4.38), Ti-1Fe-0.35O (trade mark “Super TIX800” made by Nippon Steel Corporation, specific gravity 4.54), Ti-5Al-2Fe-3Mo (trade mark “Super TIX523AFM” made by Nippon Steel Corporation, specific gravity 4.45), Ti-6Al-1Fe (trade mark “VLTi” made by Daido Steel Co., Ltd., specific gravity 4.42), and the like.
Particularly preferred are Ti—Al—Fe alloys containing 4.5 to 5.5% by weight of aluminum, 0.5 to 1.5% by weight of iron, and the remaining amount of titanium and unavoidable impurities, e.g., Ti-5Al-1Fe alloy. These alloys have a high Young's modulus and a high tensile strength and can be processed, for example, by performing hot forging under suitable conditions. If the aluminum content is less than 4.5% by weight, fragile ω phase is easy to appear, so the tensile strength tends to be lowered. If the aluminum content is more than 5.5% by weight, the plastic deformation characteristic tends to lower to deteriorate the processability. Fe makes formation of intermetallic compounds with Ti difficult to thereby stabilize the β phase and to lower the deformation stress and, therefore, it serves to raise the plastic deformation characteristic so as to improve the processability. Therefore, if the Fe content is less than 0.5% by weight, such an effect cannot be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, Fe is easy to cause hardening and going fragile if the alloy is kept at about 500° C. for a long time, so handling becomes difficult upon manufacturing. For such a reason, it is preferable that the upper limit of the Fe content is 1.5% by weight. The Ti—Al—Fe alloys may contain O, N, C, H, mixtures thereof or the like as the unavoidable impurities mentioned above.
It is particularly preferred that the Ti—Al—Fe alloys are those having a Young's modulus of 120 to 150 GPa and a tensile strength of 950 to 2,200 MPa. The titanium alloys having such high Young's modulus and tensile strength are advantageous in that a larger weight margin can be secured from the face portion 3 without impairing the durability, since the face portion can be formed thin with maintaining the strength thereof. From the viewpoint of enhancing the durability and the repellency in good balance, the Young's modulus is preferably at least 125 GPa, more preferably at least 130 GPa, and is preferably at most 145 GPa, more preferably at most 140 GPa, the most preferably at most 135 GPa.
Further, if the tensile strength of the Ti—Al—Fe alloys is less than 950 MPa, the face portion 3 must be made considerably thick in order to secure the durability and strength durable against repeated ball hitting. In that case, the repellency of the club head tends to be remarkably lowered or a sufficient weight margin tends to be not obtained because of increase in weight of the face portion 3. From such points of view, it is preferable that the tensile strength of these titanium alloys is at least 1,000 MPa, especially at least 1,100 MPa, more especially at least 1,200 MPa. On the other hand, if the tensile strength of the titanium alloys is more than 2,200 MPa, the toughness is lowered, so the head becomes fragile to lower the durability. From such a point of view, it is preferable that the tensile strength of the Ti—Al—Fe alloys is at most 1,800 MPa, especially at most 1,600 MPa.
In the present invention, the face portion 3 of the club head 1 is formed to have a thickness of 1.5 to 4.0 mm in order to secure the flight distance performance and durability which are required for wood-type golf club heads. That is to say, if the thickness is less than 1.5 mm, the durability tends to be deteriorated due to lack of strength of the face portion 3. If the thickness is more than 4.0 mm, the flight distance tends to be remarkably decreased since the face portion 3 does not sufficiently bend on hitting to deteriorate the repellency.
The thickness of the face portion 3 may be constant over the entire region, but is preferably varied so that, as shown in
The central thick portion 3A forms a central region including at least a sweet spot SS (i.e., a preferable hitting zone). The sweet spot SS denotes, as shown in
The thickness t1 of the central thick portion 3A is not particularly limited, but from the viewpoints as mentioned above, it is preferable that the central thick portion 3A has a thickness t1 of at least 2.5 mm, especially at least 2.8 mm, and has a thickness t1 of at most 3.5 mm. The thickness t2 of the peripheral thin portion 3B is also not particularly limited, but it is preferable that the peripheral thin portion 3B has a thickness t2 of at least 1.5 mm, especially at least 2.0 mm, and has a thickness t2 of at most 3.0 mm.
In the present invention, a thickness-transitional portion 3C at which the thickness smoothly changes and which connects the both portions 3A and 3B may be disposed between the central thick portion 3A and the peripheral thin portion 3B, as shown in
In order to more surely enhance the repellency and the durability of the club head, it is preferable that the average thickness “ta” of the face portion 3 is from 2.0 to 3.0 mm. The “average thickness of the face portion 3” as shown herein means an area-weighted average value calculated under consideration of thickness of respective portions 3A, 3B and the like of the face portion 3 by the following equation:
Average thickness ta=Σ(tai·Si)/ΣSi(i=1,2 . . . )
wherein “tai” is a thickness of an optional region “i” of the face portion 3, and Si is an area of the region “i” occupied by the thickness “tai”.
In the club head 1 of the present invention, the X/Y ratio of the depth X (mm) of the center of gravity to the moment of inertia Y (g·cm2) about the vertical axis passing through the center of gravity is set to a small value, specifically 0.0070 or less. The “depth of the center of gravity” denotes a horizontal length between the center of gravity G and the sweet spot SS on the hitting face 2 in the front-rear direction of the club head 1.
When the X/Y ratio is large, no matter how large the moment of inertia Y is made, the depth of the center of gravity also relatively becomes large, so a moment rotating the head on an off-center hit is increased and accordingly a large gear effect tends to appear. On the other hand, when the X/Y ratio is set to not more than 0.0070, preferably not more than 0.0065, more preferably not more than 0.0060, it is possible to restrict the depth X of the center of gravity to such a small value as exerting no bad influence on the moment of inertia Y about the vertical axis. As a result, the gear effect on off-center hits is surely suppressed and the amount of side spin of hit ball is decreased to stabilize the flight direction performance. This parameter has been found for the first time by the present inventor and noticeable effects thereof will be shown in the working examples described after.
The under limit of the X/Y ratio is not particularly limited because the smaller the depth X of the center of gravity, the flight direction performance on off-center hits is more improved. However, in view of the volume of club head 1 and a conventional head shape, it would be difficult to decrease the X/Y ratio to less than 0.0050 and, therefore, it is practical to set the X/Y ratio to 0.0050 or more.
The moment of inertia Y of the club head 1 about the vertical axis is not particularly limited, but from the viewpoints of improving the flight direction performance and making the X/Y value small, it is preferable that the head 1 has a moment of inertia Y of 3,500 g·cm2 or more, especially 3,800 g·cm2 or more, more especially 4,000 g·cm2 or more. The upper limit thereof is also not particularly limited, but in view of other restrictions such as golf rules, head weight, swing easiness and the like, it is preferable that the moment of inertia Y is at most 5,900 g·cm2.
Similarly, in the present invention, the depth X of the center of gravity of the club head 1 is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoints of improving the flight direction performance and making the X/Y value small, it is preferable that the head 1 has a depth of the center of gravity of 30 mm or less, especially 28 mm or less, more especially 26 mm or less. On the other hand, if the depth of the center of gravity is too small, there is a possibility that the production of club heads will be difficult in view of the head volume of a conventional head shape. Therefore, it is preferable that the depth X of the center of gravity is at least 18 mm, especially at least 20 mm, more especially at least 22 mm.
The club head 1 of the present invention has a fitting face convexly curved such that, as shown in
When a wood-type golf club is set in the standard state, the hitting face provided with bulge looks toward the right of the target line of flight on the toe side of the sweet spot SS and looks toward the left of the target line on the heel side of the sweet spot SS. Such a convex curvature is provided in order to compensate for excessive gear effect which is produced by off-center hit and causes a ball to greatly curve. That is to say, when a wood-type club strikes a golf ball at a point which is offset from the center of the face, a spin is imparted to the ball by the gear effect. As shown in
In the present invention, the club head is designed to have a small X/Y ratio of the depth X of the center of gravity to the moment of inertia Y in order to suppress the gear effect on off-center hit so as to decrease the amount of side spin of a ball. Therefore, the degree of curving in flight of hit ball is smaller than that of a ball hit by conventional club heads. Thus, the hitting face 2 of the club head 1 of the present invention is provided with a horizontal bulge having a large radius of curvature as compared with conventional club heads, i.e., a radius of curvature Rc of 330.2 to 457.2 mm (13 to 18 inches) for the intersection line K. This is one of the features of the present invention. That is to say, in the present invention, the angle of driving a ball toward the right or left of the target line of flight on off-center hit is made small while suppressing the curving in flight of a ball on off-center hit, whereby the flight direction performance is remarkably improved as compared with conventional club heads. In particular, the radius of curvature Rc of the intersection line K is preferably at least 342.9 mm (13.5 inches), more preferably at least 355.6 mm (14 inches), and is preferably at most 431.8 mm (17 inches), more preferably at most 406.4 mm (16 inches).
The “radius of curvature Rc” of the intersection line K as defined herein is determined as follows: As shown in
The term “radius of curvature” generally means a radius of curvature at a point on a curved line, but the radii Rc, Rh, Rm and Rt of curvature as used herein follow the above definition.
The heel side outermost end Peh and the toe side outermost end Pet of the line K are points on the periphery of the hitting face 2. In the case that the periphery of the face 2 is defined by a clear ridge line in the face portion 3, this ridge line denotes the periphery of the face 2. However, in the case that the ridge line is not clear, the club head 1 is cut by a large number of planes E1, E2, E3 . . . passing through the above-mentioned normal line N, as shown in
The intersection line K may comprise a single arc (i.e., Rc=Rh=Rm=Rt) or a plurality of arcs which are smoothly continuous with each other. In the latter case, it is preferable that the heel side radius Rh, middle portion radius Rm and toe side radius Rt of the line K all fall within the range of 330.2 to 457.2 mm. Further, it is particularly effective that at all of the effective heel side end point A, the heel side point B, the middle point C, the toe side point D and the effective toe side end point E, a single hypothetical arc passing through three points, namely each of these points A to E and points on the both sides thereof 5 mm away from it, also has a radius of curvature within the range of 330.2 to 457.2 mm.
A golf club shaft (now shown) is attached to a heel side of the club head 1 through the hosel portion 7. Therefore, when a ball is hit on the heel of the club head, the rotation amount of the head rotating about the center of gravity G is smaller as compared with the toe hit and, therefore, the gear effect is hard to occur. That is to say, the curve of the flight line on heel hit is smaller than that on toe hit. Therefore, it is preferable that in the intersection line K, the radius of curvature Rh on the heel side is larger than the radius of curvature Rm of the middle portion of the line K and the radius of curvature Rt on the toe side. Specifically, it is preferable that the heel side radius Rh is larger than the middle portion radius Rm and the toe side radius Rt by at least 12.7 mm (0.5 inch), especially at least 25.4 mm (1 inch). On the other hand, if the difference in radius of curvature is excessive, the appearance of the face 2 becomes distorted and the face is squared with difficulty or the ball will not curve back toward the target line of flight. Therefore, the difference of the radius Rh from the radii Rm and Rt is preferably at most 101.6 mm (4 inches), more preferably at most 76.2 mm (3 inches), the most preferably at most 50.8 mm (2 inches).
In the present invention, a means for achieving the desired X/Y ratio is not particularly limited. In a preferable embodiment, for example, each portion of the club head 1 is formed as thin as possible, and a surplus weight obtained thereby is disposed in a peripheral portion of the head in the form of a weight member made of a material having a large specific gravity. In particular, in order to have a low center of gravity of a head so as to achieve a large launch angle and a low back spin, it is preferable to dispose the weight member at a location which is in a lower region of sole portion 5 or side portion 6 and which is apart from the center of gravity location obtained before attaching the weight.
In the embodiment shown in
Further, it is preferable that at least two weight members are disposed, and it is more preferable that these weight members are disposed so that the center of gravity of each weight member is located on a front side of the center of gravity G of the head 1, at least one weight member is located on the toe side of the center of gravity G and at least one weight member is located on the heel side of the center of gravity G. By such an arrangement of the weight members, the X/Y ratio of the depth X of the center of gravity to the moment of inertia Y can be controlled within the desired range while achieving a large volume of the head with suppressing increase in head weight. Thus, the flight direction performance is more surely improved.
In the present invention, in order to suppress the gear effect, the depth X of the center of gravity is set to a small value as compared with the moment of inertia. In general, in case of a golf club head having a small depth of the center of gravity, the face is hard to return to the address position during the swing, although it depends on a golfer's ability and, therefore, the face tends to strike a ball in the open state and cause the ball to fly to the right of the target line. Also, a slice spin is easy to be imparted to the ball, the ball driven out toward the right tends to further curve toward the right. Such a club head is generally expressed to be bad in ball catch.
Preferably, in order to prevent deterioration of ball catch, the club head 1 of the present invention has a small face progression FP. As shown in
In the present invention, it is preferable to prepare both the face member 1A and the head body 1B from a titanium alloy. In particular, it is preferable to prepare the head body 1B from a titanium alloy (hereinafter referred to as “second titanium alloy”) having a larger specific gravity than that of the titanium alloy (hereinafter referred to as “first titanium alloy”) used in the face member 1A. This is useful for increasing the moment of inertia Y about the vertical axis of the head 1. If the specific gravity of the second titanium alloy is too large, the head weight is easy to markedly increase and, therefore, it is preferably at most 4.51. The second titanium alloy can be selected from the titanium alloys exemplified for the face member 1A.
Since the first titanium alloy has a smaller specific gravity than the second titanium alloy, the sg1/sg2 ratio of the specific gravity sg1 of the first alloy to the specific gravity sg2 of the second alloy is less than 1.0, but the sg1/sg2 ratio is preferably about 0.95 or more. In a preferable embodiment as shown in the accompanying drawings, for example, a Ti-6Al-4V alloy is used as a second titanium alloy while preparing the face member 1A from a Ti-5Al-1Fe alloy having a specific gravity of 4.38. In that case, since the specific gravity of the second titanium alloy is about 4.42, the difference in specific gravity from the first titanium alloy is about 0.04 and the sg1/sg2 ratio is 0.99.
It is preferable that the second titanium alloy also has sufficient strength and Young's modulus for use in head 1 as well as the first titanium alloy. Specifically, the Young's modulus of the second titanium alloy is preferably at least 100 GPa, more preferably at least 105 GPa, and is preferably at most 120 GPa, more preferably at most 115 GPa. The tensile strength of the second titanium alloys is preferably at least 900 MPa, more preferably at least 1,000 MPa, and is preferably at most 1,200 MPa.
In particular, it is preferable that the e1/e2 ratio of the Young's modulus e1 of the first titanium alloy to the Young's modulus e2 of the second titanium alloy is at least 1.0, especially at least 1.05, more especially at least 1.10, and as for the upper limit, is at most 1.50, especially at most 1.35, more especially at most 1.30. It is also preferable that the S1/S2 ratio of the tensile strength S1 of the first titanium alloy to the tensile strength S2 of the second titanium alloy is at least 1.05, and as for the upper limit, is at most 1.35, especially at most 1.30. When the Young's modulus and tensile strength of the second titanium alloy used in the head body 1B are specified in such a manner in relation to those of the first titanium alloy used in the face member 1A, stress concentration at a joint portion of joining the face member and the head body is eased to improve the durability of the head 1.
While a preferable embodiment of the present invention has been described with reference to the drawings, it goes without saying that the present invention is not limited to only such an embodiment and various changes and modifications may be made.
The present invention is more specifically described and explained by means of the following Examples and Comparative Examples. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to these Examples.
Wood-type golf club heads having a two piece structure as shown in
In Example 5 was used a product of hot forging at 940° C. for 10 minutes of a Ti-5Al-1Fe alloy (Al: 5% by weight, Fe: 1% by weight, Ti and unavoidable impurities: the rest; specific gravity 4.38; tensile strength 1,300 MPa; Young's modulus 135 GPa).
In the other Examples and Comparative Examples was used a press molding product of a rolled plate of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy (Al: 6% by weight, V: 4% by weight, Ti and unavoidable impurities: the rest; specific gravity 4.42; tensile strength 1,200 MPa; Young's modulus 115 GPa).
Each face member was formed to have a center thick portion including a sweet spot and a peripheral thin portion around the center portion. The center portion had a thickness of 3.3 mm, and the peripheral portion had a thickness of 2.5 mm.
Head Body:
In all Examples and Comparative Examples was used a lost-wax precision casting product of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy mentioned above. The thickness of the crown and side portions was 0.7 mm, and the thickness of the sole portion was 0.9 mm.
Weight members having a columnar shape were prepared by sintering of a W—Ni alloy having a specific gravity of 14.5, and were attached to the locations shown in
The face member and the head body were joined by plasma welding.
The hitting test was made as follows:
The same FRP shafts were attached to all heads to be tested to give wood gold clubs having a full length of 46 inches. Each of the golf clubs was attached to a swing robot, and struck three-piece golf balls (trade mark “SRIXON” Z-UR made by SRI Sports Limited) at a head speed of 45 m/s measured at the sweet spot. There were measured the amount of side spin (minus sign: hook spin, plus sign: slice spin), the angle of hitting direction to the right or left (minus sign: flying to the left direction, plus sign: flying to the right direction), and the amount of swerve from the target direction to the stopping position of a hit ball (minus sign: swerve to the left, plus sign: swerve to the right). In each test, six golf balls were hit for each of a toe hit of hitting a ball at a position apart from the sweet spot toward the toe by 20 mm and a heel hit of hitting a ball at a position apart from the sweet spot toward the heel by 20 mm.
The results are shown in Table 1 by the average of found values obtained by hitting 6 balls for each club.
From the results shown in Table 1, it is confirmed that the golf club heads of the Examples according to the present invention have better flight direction performance than the club heads of the Comparative Examples such that the side spin amount is small and the angle of driving out a golf ball with respect to the target line is also small. In particular, since the club heads of Examples 2 and 3 have a large heel side bulge, the amount of rightward or leftward swerve on heel hits is suppressed small. Further, it is found that the amount of swerve of a hit ball in Example 3 shifts toward the right direction as compared with Example 2. The reason is considered that the face progression of the club head of Example 3 is larger than that of the club head of Example 2.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-285347 | Oct 2006 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5681228 | Mikame et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5935020 | Stites et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6254494 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6340337 | Hasebe et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6344002 | Kajita | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6425832 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6572491 | Hasebe et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6679786 | McCabe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6716114 | Nishio | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6875130 | Nishio | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6913546 | Kakiuchi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7077762 | Kouno et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7131912 | Knuth | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7163468 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7300360 | Oyama | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7396297 | Hirano | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7479070 | Hirano | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20060172819 | Sano | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
57-1360 | Jan 1982 | JP |
03070584 | Mar 1991 | JP |
08024376 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08089603 | Apr 1996 | JP |
08196665 | Aug 1996 | JP |
08308962 | Nov 1996 | JP |
9-140836 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09140836 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11033145 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11178956 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000084124 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000116823 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000167089 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000300701 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001161866 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001190715 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001231888 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001321466 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002078832 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002210047 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-224247 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002325867 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002360746 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003320061 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004195005 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-261451 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004261451 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006-212092 | Aug 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080096688 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |