The present invention relates generally to wooden frame construction materials and techniques, and more specifically to an open-web wooden truss with enhanced fire resistance.
Since their introduction in about 1960, light timber, open-web wood trusses have become one of the most widely used engineered wood building products employed in commercial construction. According to the Wood Truss Council of America (WTCA), such trusses are lightweight, easy to install, and have nailable chords for easy attachment of roof decking and ceiling materials. Open-webbing provides great benefits to plumbers and electricians, without the need to spend time cutting holes in floor members. Less cutting reduces jobsite labor and reduces potentially critical errors that could result in compromising the structural integrity of the components. Open-web wood trusses are lighter, less expensive and can be stronger than large, single “closed web” support members.
When subject to fire damage, the weak link or cause of failure of such open-web trusses is the detachment of the metal gusset plates used to connect the framing members together. Under load, as the wood chars and the metal gusset plates heat up under fire, the teeth of the metal gusset plates lose strength and holding power. The loss of the gusset plate on the bottom chord of a truss can lead to tensile forces pulling the truss apart. The loss of a gusset plate on the top chord will cause any web members attached to the top chord to pull away. Both situations will significantly reduce the load-carrying capacity of the installed truss and may even lead to a truss collapse.
Thus, engineered building components provide adequate strength under normal loading, but under fire conditions, these truss systems can fail, leading to the collapse of roof, floors, and possibly the entire structure. Truss systems are usually hidden, and fires within truss systems can go undetected for long periods of time, resulting in loss of structural integrity prior to discovery of the fire. Structural design codes often do not factor in the decreased system integrity as the fire degrades the structural members. Accordingly, there is a need for open-web truss systems having enhanced fire resistance.
The above-identified need is met by the present open-web wooden truss assembly, in which approximately six-inch wide gypsum wallboard batten strips are attached to a lower surface of the lower chord of the truss. The width of the strip compared to the approximate 4-inch width of the chord, means that the wallboard batten strips extend laterally beyond edges of the chord. In this manner, a fire resistant barrier is created that protects both the chord from charring, and the metal gusset plates from degrading due to the intense heat generated by the fire. In addition, the batten strips also provide a ledge of approximately 1 inch extending away from, and along each edge of the chord, creating a support platform for insulation installed prior to the fabrication of the wallboard ceiling. It has been found that a ceiling made from trusses equipped with the present batten strips, and having a ceiling of two layers of fire rated ⅝ inch gypsum wallboard fastened to the strips, successfully resisted charring by fire for at least two hours.
A preferred construction system using the present truss includes the truss with the batten strip along the lower chord, insulation strips inserted between trusses and supported by the ledges defined by the batten strips, then RC-1 sound attenuation channels secured transversely to the batten strips, so that the batten strips are acoustically decoupled from the wallboard ceiling boards attached to the RC-1 channels. The gypsum wallboard ceiling panels or boards are then secured to the RC-1 channels, as is well known in the art. Preferably two thicknesses of ceiling boards are attached to the RC-1 channels.
More specifically, a wooden frame truss with enhanced fire resistance is provided and includes an upper chord extending along a longitudinal axis, a lower chord disposed below the upper chord and extending along a vertically displaced, parallel axis, a plurality of supports attached between the upper and lower chords, and a plurality of metal gusset plates securing the supports to the chords. At least one wallboard batten strip is attached to an underside of the lower chord, the strip being constructed and arranged so that the strip defines a ledge extending from each side of the lower chord.
In another embodiment, a ceiling system is provided, and includes a plurality of wooden frame trusses with enhanced fire resistance, each truss including an upper chord extending along a longitudinal axis, a lower chord disposed below the upper chord and extending along a vertically displaced, parallel axis, a plurality of supports being attached between the upper and lower chords. A plurality of metal gusset plates secures the supports to the chords. At least one wallboard batten strip is attached to an underside of the lower chord, each strip being constructed and arranged so that the strip defines a ledge extending from each side of the lower chord. At least one length of insulation is inserted between adjacent beams and supported by the ledges, and at least one RC-1 strip is secured to an underside of each batten. In addition, at least one wallboard panel is secured to the at least one RC-1 strip.
Referring now to
As is known in the art, metal gusset plates 18 are used for securing the supports 16 to the associated chords 12, 14. The plates 18 are provided with a plurality of pointed teeth (not shown) for gripping the wood, and are hammered or pressed in place during construction of the truss 10. As described above, during fire conditions, conventional trusses 10 have been known to fail, in part due to charring of the chords 12 and 14, and also to the deterioration of the gusset plates 18, which results in the supports 16 detaching from the chords, and the structural failure of the truss.
Referring now to
A main distinguishing feature of the truss 20 is the attachment of at least one wallboard batten strip 24 to an underside 26 of the lower chord, 14. Each batten strip 24 is preferably cut from a conventional gypsum wallboard panel, having a thickness of either ½ or ⅝ inch depending on the application. In width, each batten strip 24 is approximately 6-8 inches, however the width may vary to suit the application. Each batten strip 24 is constructed and arranged so that the strip defines a ledge 28 extending from each side 30 of the lower chord 14. It is preferred that the chord 14 is generally centered upon the batten strip 24, so that the ledges 28 extending from each side 30 are relatively equal to each other. In an embodiment, the ledges 28 extend one inch from the corresponding sides 30, however it is contemplated that the distance extending from the side may vary to suit the application. Further, it is preferred that the batten strips 24 extend coextensively along a length of the lower chord 14.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
Tests of the present system 22 including the truss 20 have shown that the system withstands fire for at least two hours. The test procedure was performed at the Western Fire Center, Inc., Kelso, Wash. The test procedure was pursuant to ASTM E119 and employed a modified construction described in Underwriters Laboratory design assembly L577. The testing was performed using a horizontal fire resistance test furnace employing the fire endurance conditions and standard time-temperature curve described in ASTM E119. Temperature measurements were taken inside the natural gas furnace using 9 thermocouples (TCf) connected to a computerized data acquisition. TCf locations were symmetrically disposed and distributed to show the temperature near the exposed face of the test assembly.
According to the test criteria the system/assembly will have sustained the applied load for the indicated two hour time without passage of flame or gases hot enough to ignite cotton waste; and transmission of heat through the assembly will not have resulted in a temperature rise of more than 139° C./250° F. above its initial temperature, or if a temperature higher than 30% (181° C./325° F. of the specified limit occurs at any one point on the unexposed side of the assembly.
In the test, on the underside of the lower chord 14 bottom of each truss 20 was applied a 6 in. (2¾ inch on exterior rim support) gypsum batten strip (same material that was used for the ceiling), initially fastened with #6 2¼ in. screws at 12″ on center. Full strips (10′) and short strips (3′) were alternately placed over each truss. Unfaced fiberglass insulation (Owens Corning ProPink® R-11, M44) strips were loosely laid on top of the batten strips, each strip of insulation being 3⅝×20 in. The density of the insulation was 0.49 lb./ft.3. Steel (25GA) resilient channels (RC) were fastened with #6 screws perpendicular to the underside of the batten strip at 12 in. on center, alternating between screws already fastened into the batten strip. The RC channel was located so that the perpendicular gypsum (butt) joint for the exposed face could be fastened 2 in. in both directions (4 in. total) with a 4 in. overlap splice. The ceiling (exposed side below trusses) was lined with two layers of USG ⅝ in. SHEETROCK® Brand Gypsum Panels, FIRECODE® fire rated C Core, which was supplied in 4′×10′ lengths before being cut to size. The measured mass and average thickness of the butt and tapered edge of the gypsum were 2.49±0.01 lb./ft.2, 0.63±0.01 in., and 0.58±0.01 in., respectively.
Gypsum panels were installed perpendicular to the underside of the RC and fastened with Type S steel screws (1 in. and 1⅝ in.) spaced 8 in. on center and located 1 in. from the tapered edge and ½ in. and 2 in. from the butt joint edge for the base and face layers, respectively. All exposed gypsum joints were taped (2 in.) and covered with two layers of dry mix joint compound. The exposed nail heads were also covered with two layers of compound.
A superimposed load was applied to the assembly provide a distributed load of 51.56 lb.f/ft., or a combined live (40 lb.f/ft.2) and dead (23.5 lb.f/ft.2) load on the top chord of 63.5 lb.f/ft.2. The loading of the assembly was accomplished by 20 weighted barrels (581.6 lb./barrel or 11,632 lb. total), each placed upon two 50 in., nominal 4×4 wood bunks, evenly spanned over three trusses (5 barrels spanning 4′×14.10′). This load applied was the calculated maximum theoretical load permitted by nationally recognized design standards. The deflection of the floor assembly was measured with one linear voltage displacement transducer (LVDT) located at the geometric center of the assembly.
After the furnace exposure and test termination, the fire was extinguished with water. Some of the gypsum wallboard had fallen away due to the extinguishment, but the RC and batten strips remained in place, with some bowing of the RC mid-cavity. Much of the fiberglass insulation was still in place with deterioration on the bottom, but largely whole on the top. A few gusset plates were observed to be pulling from the trusses, and the lower chord was charred, although no charring was observed on the bottom of the subfloor. The 2¼ inch screws and batten strips were sufficient to hold the RC and wallboard in place for the duration of the test.
The floor/ceiling assembly passed the requirements for the 2-hr fire endurance test, according to ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials. The fire resistance assembly had a finish rating of 100 min., rounding to the nearest integral minute. The floor/ceiling assembly did not allow flames to pass through the assembly for the 125 min. based from when the test was terminated. There was no unexposed temperature failure for average or single-point thresholds (139° C. +ambient, 181° C. +ambient) during the 125 min. test. Therefore, this assembly was considered certifiable for a 2 hr. 5 min resistance time.
While a particular embodiment of the present wooden frame truss with enhanced fire resistance has been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1791278 | Lucy | Feb 1931 | A |
2097722 | Coddington | Nov 1937 | A |
4266384 | Orals et al. | May 1981 | A |
4862662 | Eberle et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
20090107059 | Kipp et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107072 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19714625 | Oct 1998 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Knauf Gips KG, “K25.de Knauf Fireboard Beam and Column Encasements”, System Data Sheet Catalog, Jun. 1, 2013 edition, retrieved Dec. 3, 2015 <http://www.wego-systembaustoffe.de/shopware—wego—static/pdf/vti/technishes—datenblatt/knf/k25—englisch.pdf>. |
PCT Search Report from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050351, mailed Dec. 10, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160097196 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |