WORD VECTOR CHANGING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Abstract

To arrange all words so that the distance of a given word pair will be appropriate.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a word vector changing device, method and program that, given a set of pairs of a word and a vector representing a concept of the word, converts the vectors of words such that a distance between the vectors of words in a semantically distant word pair which is present in a dictionary becomes greater than before, that the distance between the vectors of words in a semantically close word pair present in the dictionary becomes smaller than before, and that the distance between the vectors of words in a word pair that is not present in the dictionary is changed as little as possible.

BACKGROUND ART

A concept base is a set of pairs of a word and a vector representing the concept of the word and approaches to it include ones described in Non-Patent Literatures 1 and 2.

These approaches both generate the vectors of words using a corpus as input, producing an arrangement in which the vectors of semantically close words lie close to each other. Their generation algorithms are based on a distribution hypothesis that the concept of a word can be estimated from an occurrence pattern of surrounding words around the word (marginal distribution) within a corpus.

Using a concept base generated by these approaches, a distance representing similarity between texts can be calculated. For a given text, a vector for the text is generated by combining the vectors of words in the text (e.g., by determining a barycenter of the word vectors). The distance between the corresponding text vectors is calculated as the distance between the texts.

CITATION LIST

Non-Patent Literature

Non-Patent Literature 1: Bessho Katsuji, Uchiyama Toshiro, Uchiyama Tadasu, Kataoka Ryoji and Oku Masahiro, “A Method for Generating Corpus-concept-base Based on Co-occurrences between Words and Semantic Attributes,” Information Processing Society of Japan Transaction, Vol.49, No.12, pp.3997-4006, December 2008.

Non-Patent Literature 2: Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, Jeffrey Dean, “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space,”ICLR, 2013.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Technical Problem

A concept base generated by the foregoing conventional approaches has the following issues.

Issue 1)

Since a pair of antonyms (e.g., yoi (good), warui (bad)) has similar marginal distributions for the respective words, it has an issue of the vectors of the words being close to each other. This leads to an inappropriate distance relationship between text vectors.

For example, with respect to the word “yoi (good)”, its antonym “warui (bad)” will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance than a synonym “yoroshii (all right)”. Consequently, for text A below, text B will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance than text C even though text C has a closer meaning to text A than text B does.

Text A: Kono kangae wa yoi (this idea is good).

Text B: Kono kangae wa warui (this idea is bad).

Text C: Kono kangae wa yoroshii (this idea is all right).

Issue 2)

For a pair of words, when one of the words is not a hypernym, a hyponym, or a synonym of the other and they have a common hypernym, the pair is called a pair of co-hyponyms. For a pair of words “yakyu (baseball), sakka (soccer)”, either one of the words is not a hypernym, a hyponym, or a synonym of the other and they have a common hypernym “supotsu (sport)”, so they constitute a pair of co-hyponyms.

Since a pair of co-hyponyms (e.g., yakyu (baseball), sakka (soccer)) has similar marginal distributions for the respective words, it has an issue of the vectors of the words being close to each other. This leads to an inappropriate distance relationship between text vectors.

For example, with respect to the word “yakyu (baseball)”, a co-hyponym of it “sakka (soccer)” will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance than a hyponym “kusayakyu (sandlot baseball)”. Consequently, for text A below, text B will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance than text C even though text C has a closer meaning to text A than text B does.

Text A: Yakyu wo miru (watch a baseball).

Text B: Sakka wo miru (watch a soccer).

Text C: Kusayakyu wo miru (watch a sandlot baseball).

Issue 3)

A pair of synonyms (e.g., yakyu, besuboru (transliteration of “baseball”)) has the issue of the vectors of the words being distant from each other in some cases. This leads to an inappropriate distance relationship between text vectors.

For example, with respect to the word “yakyu (baseball)”, a synonym of it “besuboru” will have a larger vector-to-vector distance than a hyponym “kusayakyu (sandlot baseball)”. Consequently, for text A below, text C will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance than text B even though text B has a closer meaning to text A than text C does.

Text A: Yakyu wo miru (watch a baseball).

Text B: Besuboru wo miru (watch a besuboru).

Text C: Kusayakyu wo miru (watch a sandlot baseball).

The present invention seeks to solve these issues and makes an arrangement of word vectors reflect semantic closeness between words by converting the vectors of words in a once generated concept base. More specifically, it performs conversion such that the distance between the vectors of words in a semantically distant word pair which is present in a dictionary, such as antonyms and co-hyponyms, becomes greater than before, and that the distance between the vectors of words in a semantically close word pair present in the dictionary, such as synonyms, becomes smaller than before. However, performing only it results in an unreasonable increase or decrease in the distance between vectors for a word pair that is not present in the dictionary, making their arrangement inappropriate. Thus, it is necessary to convert the vectors of words so that a word pair present in the dictionary is given an appropriate distance, while at the same time so that the distance of a word pair that is not present in the dictionary is changed as little as possible. An object of the present invention is to arrange all words so that the distance of a given word pair will be appropriate.

Means for Solving the Problem

To attain the object, a word vector changing device according to the present invention includes: a concept base which is a set of pairs of a word and a vector representing a concept of the word; and a conversion means configured: with a dictionary which is a set of semantically distant or close word pairs as input, when a word pair C being a pair of given words A, B in the concept base is present in the dictionary, to associate with the word pair C a magnitude D of a difference vector between a difference vector V′ between a converted vector of the word A and a converted vector of the word B, and a vector kV determined by multiplying a difference vector V between the vector of the word A in the concept base and the vector of the word B in the concept base by a scalar value k, when the word pair C is not present in the dictionary, to associate the magnitude D of the difference vector between the difference vector V′ and the difference vector V with the word pair C, and to convert the vector of a given word in the concept base such that a total sum of the magnitude D corresponding to every word pair C is minimized.

The conversion means of the word vector changing device according to the present invention sets the scalar value k to a value equal to or greater than 1 when word pair C is a semantically distant word pair in the dictionary, and sets the scalar value k to a value equal to or greater than 0 and equal to or smaller than 1 when the word pair C is a semantically close word pair in the dictionary.

A word vector changing method according to the present invention is in a word vector conversion device including a concept base which is a set of pairs of a word and a vector representing a concept of the word, the method including, with a dictionary which is a set of semantically distant or close word pairs as input, when a word pair C being a pair of given words A, B in the concept base is present in the dictionary, associating, by conversion means, with the word pair C a magnitude D of a difference vector between a difference vector V′ between a converted vector of the word A and a converted vector of the word B, and a vector kV determined by multiplying a difference vector V between the vector of the word A in the concept base and the vector of the word B in the concept base by a scalar value k, when the word pair C is not present in the dictionary, associating the magnitude D of the difference vector between the difference vector V′ and the difference vector V with the word pair C, and converting the vector of a given word in the concept base such that a total sum of the magnitude D corresponding to every word pair C is minimized.

A program according to the present invention is a program for causing a computer to function as the conversion means of the word vector changing device according to the present invention.

Effects of the Invention

With the present invention, the difference vector V′ after conversion is approximately equal to kV, which is k times the difference vector V before conversion. For a semantically distant word pair present in the dictionary such as antonyms and co-hyponyms, setting k to k>1 results in their vector-to-vector distance after conversion being greater than that before conversion. For a semantically close word pair present in the dictionary such as synonyms, setting k to k<1 results in their vector-to-vector distance after conversion being smaller than that before conversion. For a word pair that is not present in the dictionary, their vector-to-vector distance after conversion is changed little from that before conversion. In this manner, a converted concept base that achieves an arrangement of all the words with a given word pair having an appropriate distance can be generated.

A certain concept base has a property that the difference vectors between the vectors of words from word pairs that are in the same relationship are approximately the same. That is, when the vector of word x is represented as U_x,

U _a −U _b ≈U _c −U _d  [Formula 1]

holds for a word pair (a, b) and a word pair (c, d) which are in the same relationship. For example, a word pair (otoko (man), onnna (woman)) and a word pair (oji (uncle), oba (aunt)) are in the same relationship, where

U _otoko −U _onna ≈U _oji −U _oba  [Formula 2]

holds.

In the present invention, when the converted vector of word x is represented as U_x′, for a word pair (a, b) and a word pair (c, d) that are in the same relationship,

U _a −U _b ≈U _c −U _d  [Formula 3]

holds, while

U _a ′−U _b ′≈k(U_a−U_b), U_c′−U_d′≈k(U_c−U_d)  [Formula 4]

holds (where k depending on the word pair). For all of the word pairs that are in the same relationship, the magnitude of their corresponding difference vector before conversion are approximately the same. Then, all of the word pairs that are in the same relationship are either semantically distant, or semantically close, or nor semantically distant nor close. The value k is usually defined depending on the magnitude of the difference vector before conversion. Accordingly, the same value of k can be set for each one of word pairs that are in the same relationship. Thus, for a word pair (a, b) and a word pair (c, d) that are in the same relationship,

U _a ′−U _b ′≈U _c ′−U _d′  [Formula 5]

holds. Thus, the present invention also has the effect of being able to maintain the property that the difference vectors between the vectors of words from word pairs that are in the same relationship are approximately the same, as much as possible even after conversion.

Use of a converted concept base for the calculation of an inter-text distance provides a more appropriate distance relationship between text vectors.

In the case of Issue 1), for the word “yoi (good)”, its antonym “warui (bad)” will have a greater vector-to-vector distance than a synonym “yoroshii (all right)”, so text C will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance to text A than text B does.

In the case of Issue 2), for the word “yakyu (baseball)”, a co-hyponym of it “sakka (soccer)” will have a greater vector-to-vector distance than a hyponym “kusayakyu (sandlot baseball)”, so text C will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance to text A than text B does.

In the case of Issue 3), for the word “yakyu (baseball)”, a synonym of it “besuboru (transliteration of “baseball”)” will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance than a hyponym “kusayakyu (sandlot baseball)”, so text B will have a smaller vector-to-vector distance to text A than text C does.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a word vector changing device 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows an example of a concept base 22.

FIG. 3 is an example of records related to antonyms in a dictionary 24.

FIG. 4 is an example of records related to co-hyponyms in the dictionary 24.

FIG. 5 is an example of records related to synonyms in the dictionary 24.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a conversion processing routine for the word vector changing device 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present invention are described below in conjunction with the drawings.

<Configuration of a Word Vector Changing Device According to an Embodiment of the Present Invention>

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary configuration of a word vector changing device according to claim 1 of the present invention.

The word vector changing device 100 includes a concept base 22 which is a set of pairs of a word and a vector representing a concept of the word, and conversion means 30 configured: with a dictionary 24 which is a set of semantically distant or close word pairs as input, when a word pair C being a pair of given words A, B in the concept base 22 is present in the dictionary 24, to associate with the word pair C a magnitude D of a difference vector between a difference vector V′ between a converted vector of the word A and a converted vector of the word B, and a vector kV determined by multiplying a difference vector V between the vector of the word A in the concept base 22 and the vector of the word B in the concept base 22 by a scalar value k; when the word pair C is not present in the dictionary 24, to associate the magnitude D of the difference vector between the difference vector V′ and the difference vector V with the word pair C; and to convert the vector of a given word in the concept base 22 such that a total sum of the magnitude D corresponding to every word pair C is minimized, and to generate a converted concept base 32.

FIG. 2 is an example of the concept base 22. The concept base 22 is generated with the approach of Non-Patent Literature 1 or 2, for example.

None of the words in the concept base 22 overlap.

The vector of each word is an n-dimension vector and the vectors of semantically close words are arranged close to each other.

Only content words, such as nouns, verbs and adjectives, may be registered in the concept base 22. It is also possible to register words in the end-form (shushi-kei) in the concept base 22 and search the concept base 22 with the end-form of a word.

As an example of the dictionary 24, it can be configured such that records are divided into record groups related to antonyms, co-hyponyms, and synonyms, respectively. FIG. 3 is an example of records related to antonyms, FIG. 4 is an example of records related to co-hyponyms, and FIG. 5 is an example of records related to synonyms. Each record in FIG. 3 consists of a basis word and a list of antonyms for that basis word. A pair of a basis word and each of the antonyms in its antonym list constitutes a word pair of antonyms. The same applies to FIGS. 4 and 5. Word pairs in the antonym records and the co-hyponym records are semantically distant word pairs. Word pairs in the synonym records are semantically close word pairs.

The dictionary 24 is not limited to the example above, but may be formed from a group of records each consisting of a basis word and a list of semantically distant words for that basis word and a group of records each consisting of a basis word and a list of semantically close words for that basis word. In that case, a pair of a basis word and each word in its list of semantically distant words constitutes a semantically distant word pair, and a pair of a basis word and each word in its list of semantically close words constitutes a semantically close word pair.

The dictionary 24 is typically configured such that, in records of similar types (such as being semantically distant or semantically close) in the dictionary 24, when there is a record for basis word A that has word B in its word list, there will be a record for basis word B that has word A in its word list.

Conversion processing performed by the conversion means 30 is formulated as follows.

A list of words in the concept base 22 is defined as:

W₁, W₂, . . . , W_m.  [Formula 6]

A vector of W_p in the concept base 22 is defined as:

τ_p=(τ_p1, τ_p2, . . . , τ_pn).  [Formula 7]

and a vector of W_p in the converted concept base 32 is defined as:

ω_p=(ω_p1, ω_p2, . . . , ω_pn).  [Formula 8]

The value τ_pq is a constant and ω_pq is a variable.

For a word pair W_i,W_j in the concept base 22, a scalar value k by which a difference vector τ_i−τ_j between τ_i and τ_j is multiplied generally depends on {i,j} and is represented as k_{i,j}.

The conversion means 30 determines (ω_pq) that minimizes the objective function F below.

∥◯∥  [Formula 9]

represents L2 norm.

$\begin{array}{cc}\left[\mathrm{Formula}10\right]& \\ F=\text{?}F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}=\text{?}\left({\omega }_i-{\omega }_j\right)-\text{?}\left({\tau }_i-{\tau }_j\right)=\text{?}\left(\text{?}-\text{?},\text{?}-\text{?},\dots ,\text{?}-\text{?}\right)-\text{?}\left(\text{?}-\text{?},\text{?}-\text{?},\dots ,\text{?}-\text{?}\right)=\text{?}\left({\omega }_{i1}-{\omega }_{j1}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{i1}-{\tau }_{j1}\right),{\omega }_{i2}-{\omega }_{j2}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{i2}-{\tau }_{j2}\right),\dots ,\text{?}-\text{?}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left(\text{?}-\text{?}\right)\right)=\text{?}{\left(\text{?}{\left(\text{?}-\text{?}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left(\text{?}-\text{?}\right)\right)}^2\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}\text{?}\text{indicates text missing or illegible when filed}& \left(\mathrm{Formula}1\right)\end{array}$

Alternatively, (ω_pq) that minimizes the following objective function F is determined.

$\begin{array}{cc}\left[\mathrm{Formula}11\right]& \\ F=\text{?}F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}=\text{?}{\left({\omega }_i-{\omega }_j\right)-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_i-{\tau }_j\right)}^2=\text{?}\left(\text{?}{\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{it}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jt}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{it}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jt}}\right)\right)}^2\right)\text{?}\text{indicates text missing or illegible when filed}& \left(\mathrm{Formula}2\right)\end{array}$

Alternatively, F_(i,j) is set as some other magnitude of:

(ω_i−ω_j)−k_{i,j}(τ_i−τ_j)  [Formula 12],

and (ω_pq) that minimizes the objective function F which is the total sum of F_(i,j) is determined.

The value k_{i,j} is set as follows.

The value k_{i,j} is defined as k_{i,j}≥1 when the word pair W_i,W_j is a semantically distant word pair in the dictionary 24, is defined as 0≤k_{i,j}≤1 when the word pair W_i,W_j is a semantically close word pair in the dictionary 24, and is defined as k_{i,j}=1 when the word pair W_i,W_j is not present in the dictionary 24. While it is defined as k_{i,j}≥1 when the word pair W_i,W_j is a semantically distant word pair in the dictionary 24, it may be k_{i,j}>1 instead. Likewise, while it is defined as 0≤k_{i,j}≤1 when the word pair W_i,W_j is a semantically close word pair in the dictionary 24, it may be 0≤k_{i,j}≤1 instead.

When the word pair W_i,W_j is a semantically distant word pair in the dictionary 24, k_{i,j} may be a constant that does not depend on {i,j}. It is also possible to define a constant α>0, with

k _{i,j}=(∥τ_i−τ_j∥+α)/∥τ_i−τ_j∥.  [Formula 13]

It is also possible to define a constant β greater than the maximum of:

∥τ_i−τ_j∥  [Formula 14]

with

k _{i,j}=β/∥τ_i−τ_j∥.  [Formula 15]

It is also possible to make k_{i,j} smaller as

∥τ_i−τ_j∥  [Formula 16]

is greater so that the converted distance is prevented from being too large for a word pair originally having a large distance.

When the word pair W_i,W_j is a semantically close word pair in the dictionary 24, k_{i,j} may be a constant that does not depend on {i,j}. It is also possible to define a constant α>0, and when

∥τ_i−τ_j∥≥α  [Formula 17]

then

k _{i,j}=(∥τ_i−τ_j∥−α)/∥τ_i−τ_j∥,  [Formula 18]

and when

∥τ_i−τ_j∥<α  [Formula 19]

then

k_{i,j}=0  [Formula 20]

It is also possible to define a constant β≥0 equal to or smaller than the minimum of:

∥τ_i−τ_j∥,  [Formula 21]

with

k _{i,j}=β/∥τ_i−τ_j∥.  [Formula 22]

It is also possible to make k_{i,j} greater as

∥τ_i−τ_j∥  [Formula 23]

is smaller so that the converted distance is prevented from being too small for a word pair originally having a small distance.

The value (ω_pq) that minimizes the objective function F is determined with stochastic gradient descendant, for example. (Other optimization approaches may be used.) The stochastic gradient descendant employs the algorithm:

$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{until}\mathrm{coverged}\mathrm{or}\mathrm{repeated}a\mathrm{while}\mathrm{predetermined}\mathrm{number}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{times}\mathrm{do}\mathrm{for}\mathrm{each}\left\{i,j\right\}\in \left\{\text{?}\right\}\mathrm{do}{\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}:={\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}-\eta ·\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}\mathrm{for}1\le p\le m,1\le q\le n\text{?}\text{indicates text missing or illegible when filed}& \left[\mathrm{Formula}24\right]\end{array}$

An update portion of (m,n) matrix (ω_pq) in the above algorithm is performed in the following manner by Adagrad, for example.

Before starting the algorithm, an initial value of the matrix (ω_pq) is set for example as:

ω_pq:=τ_pq.  [Formula 25]

A (m,n) matrix (r_pq) is determined. Before starting the algorithm, an initial value of the matrix (r_pq) is set for example as:

r_pq:=ϵ(a constant)  [Formula 26]

In the updated portion of the (m,n) matrix (ω_pq) in the above algorithm, for given

1≤p≤m, 1≤q≤n  [Formula 27]

an update is made as:

$\begin{array}{cc}{r}_{\mathrm{pq}}:=r_{\mathrm{pq}}+\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}·\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}{\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}:={\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}-\frac{{\eta }_0}{\sqrt{r_{\mathrm{pq}}}}·\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}& \left[\mathrm{Formula}28\right]\end{array}$

This update will be called update (1).

When the objective function F is Formula 1, calculation of:

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}& \left[\mathrm{Formula}29\right]\end{array}$

is done as follows.

1.1) When p=i and F_{i,j}≠0,

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}}=\frac{1}{2}{\left(\text{?}{\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{it}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jt}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{it}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jt}}\right)\right)}^2\right)}^{-\frac{1}{2}}·\\ 2\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jq}}\right)\right)\\ =\frac{1}{F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jq}}\right)\right)\end{array}\text{?}\text{indicates text missing or illegible when filed}& \left[\mathrm{Formula}30\right]\end{array}$

1.2) When p=j and F_{i,j}≠0,

$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}}=\frac{1}{2}{\left(\text{?}{\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{it}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jt}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{it}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jt}}\right)\right)}^2\right)}^{-\frac{1}{2}}·\\ 2\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jq}}\right)\right)\left(-1\right)\\ =-\frac{1}{F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jq}}\right)\right)\end{array}\text{?}\text{indicates text missing or illegible when filed}& \left[\mathrm{Formula}31\right]\end{array}$

1.3) Otherwise,

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}=0& \left[\mathrm{Formula}32\right]\end{array}$

When the objective function F is Formula 2, calculation of:

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}& \left[\mathrm{Formula}33\right]\end{array}$

is done as follows.

2.1) When p=i

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}}=2\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jq}}\right)\right)& \left[\mathrm{Formula}34\right]\end{array}$

2.2) When p=j,

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}}=-2\left({\omega }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\omega }_{\mathrm{jq}}-k_{\left\{i,j\right\}}\left({\tau }_{\mathrm{iq}}-{\tau }_{\mathrm{jq}}\right)\right)& \left[\mathrm{Formula}35\right]\end{array}$

2.3) Otherwise,

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial F_{\left\{i,j\right\}}}{\partial {\omega }_{\mathrm{pq}}}=0& \left[\mathrm{Formula}36\right]\end{array}$

<Effects of the Word Vector Changing Device According to Embodiments of the Present Invention>

FIG. 6 shows an example of a conversion processing routine for the conversion means 30. In the following, processing operations at the respective steps of FIG. 6 are shown.

S1)

It is determined whether to execute a turn consisting of processing at S2 to S6.

When the turn has been executed a predetermined number of times, it is determined to end and the conversion processing routine is terminated.

When the turn has not been executed the predetermined number of times, it is determined to execute it and the flow proceeds to S2.

Even when the turn has not been executed the predetermined number of times, if the present matrix (ω_pq) is the same as the matrix (ω_pq) at the immediately preceding S1 (i.e., it has converged), it may be determined to end and the conversion processing routine may be terminated.

When the conversion processing routine is terminated, a set of pairs of each word W_p and its word vector ω_p in the concept base 22 is output as the converted concept base 32.

S2)

A list of words in the concept base 22 is represented as W₁, W₂, . . ., W_m. One word W_x selected from ones of W₁, W₂, . . . , W_m that are not selected yet at S2 is set as a target word X, and then the flow proceeds to S3. If there is no unselected word, the current turn is terminated and the flow proceeds to S1.

S3)

In a corresponding word list(s) in a record (or possibly multiple records) in the dictionary 24 for which W_x is the basis word, one word W_y is selected from those words that are present in the concept base 22, that are not selected yet at S3, and that satisfy a condition that a pair (as a set) of itself and the word W_x is not a pair (as a set) that has been subjected to processing at S4 or S6 of the current turn, and W_y is set as target word Y, after which the flow proceeds to S4. If there is no such a word, the flow proceeds to S5.

S4)

Setting i=x, j=y when x<y, and i=y, j=x when y<x, the update (1) is performed on {i,j}. In doing so,

∥τ_i−τ_j∥  [Formula 37]

may be determined, and based on

∥τ_i−τ_j∥,  [Formula 38]

an appropriate k_{i,j} may be determined, after which the update (1) may be performed. The flow then proceeds to S3.

S5)

Among W₁, W₂, . . . , W_m, one word W_z is selected from those words that are not W_x, that are not any W_y that was selected at S3, that are not selected yet at S5, and that satisfy a condition that a pair (as a set) of itself and W_x is not a pair (as a set) that has been subjected to processing at S4 or S6 of the current turn, and W_z is set as target word Z, after which the flow proceeds to S6. If there is no such a word, the flow proceeds to S2.

In order to reduce the computational complexity of S6, W₁, W₂, . . . , W_m excluding W_x may be sorted in ascending order of their distance to W_x at the start of the conversion processing routine, and a word that satisfies the above condition may be selected from among the top G words (in the order of sorting in some cases). As another alternative, among W₁, W₂, . . . , W_m excluding W_x, a word that satisfies the above condition may be selected from those words whose distance to W_x is equal to or smaller than (or less than) a threshold (in some cases, in the ascending order of distance as sorted).

S6)

Setting i=x, j=z when x<z, and i=z, j=x when z<x, the update (1) is performed on {i,j}. The flow proceeds to S5.

Before performing the conversion processing routine, it is also possible to determine, for each W_x selected at S2, a list of a pair of W_y to be selected at S3 and a distance:

∥τ_x−τ_y∥,  [Formula 39]

or a pair of W_z to be selected at S5 and a distance:

∥τ_x−τ_z∥,  [Formula 40]

and based on the distance

∥τ_x−τ_y∥,  [Formula 41]

to determine the scalar value k corresponding to each word pair (W_x,W_y). Then, in the conversion processing routine, selections at S3 and S5 may be made in accordance with the orders in the list and reference may be made to the previously determined scalar value k instead of calculating it.

The processing described thus far can be constructed into a program, which can be installed from a communications line or a recording medium and implemented by means such as a CPU.

It is noted that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments but various modifications and applications thereof are possible within the scope of the claims.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The present invention is applicable to a word vector changing technique for, given a set of pairs of a word and a vector representing the concept of the word, converting the vectors of the words so that the distance of a given word pair will be appropriate.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

22 concept base

24 dictionary

30 conversion means

32 converted concept base

100 word vector changing device

Claims

1-4. (canceled)

5. A computer-implemented method for processing aspects of words, the method comprising: receiving, from a concept base, a first concept of a first word, wherein the first concept includes a first pair of the first word and a first vector representation of the first word;receiving, from the concept base, a second concept of a second word, wherein the second concept includes a second pair of the second word and the second vector representation of the second word, wherein the second word and the first word are distinct;receiving, from a dictionary of words, a pair of words, wherein the pair of words represents a relationship between one word and the other word based on a semantic distance, wherein the semantic distance relates to a semantic relationship based on one of: synonyms, antonyms, or co-hyponyms;generating a first difference vector, wherein the first difference vector is a difference between the first vector representation of the first concept of the first word and the second vector representation of the second concept of the second word;when the pair of words matches the first word and the second word: determining, based on the pair of words, a coefficient value; andgenerating, based on a difference between the first vector representation and the second vector representation, a second difference vector, wherein a product of the second difference vector and the coefficient value differs from the first difference vector by a difference value;when the pair of words does not match the first word or the second word: generating, based on the difference between the first vector representation and the second vector representation, the second difference vector, wherein the second difference vector differs from the first difference vector by the difference value;converting, the first vector representation and the second vector representation, wherein the conversion relates to minimizing a total sum of the difference value corresponding to each occurrence of the pair of words in the dictionary; andupdating, based on the converted first vector representation and the second vector representation, the first concept and the second concept in the concept base.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, the method further comprising: when the pair of words is a pair of antonyms in the dictionary, determining the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is equal to or greater than 1.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, the method further comprising: when the pair of words is a pair of synonyms in the dictionary, determining the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is greater than zero and less than 1.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, the method further comprising: when the pair of words is a pair of co-hyponyms in the dictionary, determining the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is equal to or greater than 1.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein minimizing the total sum of the difference value relates to an optimization based on a stochastic gradient descendant.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the first vector representation of the first word includes a multi-dimensional vector.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the concept base includes words that are distinct to one another.

12. A system for processing aspects of words, the system comprises: a processor; anda memory storing computer-executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the system to:receive, from a concept base, a first concept of a first word, wherein the first concept includes a first pair of the first word and a first vector representation of the first word;receive, from the concept base, a second concept of a second word, wherein the second concept includes a second pair of the second word and the second vector representation of the second word, wherein the second word and the first word are distinct;receive, from a dictionary of words, a pair of words, wherein the pair of words represents a relationship between one word and the other word based on a semantic distance, wherein the semantic distance relates to a semantic relationship based on one of: synonyms, antonyms, or co-hyponyms;generate a first difference vector, wherein the first difference vector is a difference between the first vector representation of the first concept of the first word and the second vector representation of the second concept of the second word;when the pair of words matches the first word and the second word: determine, based on the pair of words, a coefficient value; anddetermine, based on a difference between the first vector representation and the second vector representation, a second difference vector, wherein a product of the second difference vector and the coefficient value differs from the first difference vector by a difference value;when the pair of words does not match the first word or the second word: determine, based on the difference between the first vector representation and the second vector representation, the second difference vector, wherein the second difference vector differs from the first difference vector by the difference value;convert, the first vector representation and the second vector representation, wherein the conversion relates to minimizing a total sum of the difference value corresponding to each occurrence of the pair of words in the dictionary; andupdate, based on the converted first vector representation and the second vector representation, the first concept and the second concept in the concept base.

13. The system of claim 12, the computer-executable instructions when executed further causing the system to: when the pair of words is a pair of antonyms in the dictionary, determine the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is equal to or greater than 1.

14. The system of claim 12, the computer-executable instructions when executed further causing the system to: when the pair of words is a pair of synonyms in the dictionary, determine the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is greater than zero and less than 1.

15. The system of claim 12, the computer-executable instructions when executed further causing the system to: when the pair of words is a pair of co-hyponyms in the dictionary, determine the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is equal to or greater than 1.

16. The system of claim 12, wherein minimizing the total sum of the difference value relates to an optimization based on a stochastic gradient descendant.

17. The system of claim 12, wherein the first vector representation of the first word includes a multi-dimensional vector.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein the concept base includes words that are distinct to one another.

19. A computer-readable non-transitory recording medium storing computer-executable instructions that when executed by a processor cause a computer system to: receive, from a concept base, a first concept of a first word, wherein the first concept includes a first pair of the first word and a first vector representation of the first word;receive, from the concept base, a second concept of a second word, wherein the second concept includes a second pair of the second word and the second vector representation of the second word, wherein the second word and the first word are distinct;receive, from a dictionary of words, a pair of words, wherein the pair of words represents a relationship between one word and the other word based on a semantic distance, wherein the semantic distance relates to a semantic relationship based on one of: synonyms, antonyms, or co-hyponyms;generate a first difference vector, wherein the first difference vector is a difference between the first vector representation of the first concept of the first word and the second vector representation of the second concept of the second word;when the pair of words matches the first word and the second word: determine, based on the pair of words, a coefficient value; anddetermine, based on a difference between the first vector representation and the second vector representation, a second difference vector, wherein a product of the second difference vector and the coefficient value differs from the first difference vector by a difference value;when the pair of words does not match the first word or the second word: determine, based on the difference between the first vector representation and the second vector representation, the second difference vector, wherein the second difference vector differs from the first difference vector by the difference value;convert, the first vector representation and the second vector representation, wherein the conversion relates to minimizing a total sum of the difference value corresponding to each occurrence of the pair of words in the dictionary; andupdate, based on the converted first vector representation and the second vector representation, the first concept and the second concept in the concept base.

20. The computer-readable non-transitory recording medium of claim 19, the computer-executable instructions when executed further causing the system to: when the pair of words is a pair of antonyms in the dictionary, determine the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is equal to or greater than 1.

21. The computer-readable non-transitory recording medium of claim 19, the computer-executable instructions when executed further causing the system to: when the pair of words is a pair of synonyms in the dictionary, determine the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is greater than zero and less than 1.

22. The computer-readable non-transitory recording medium of claim 19, the computer-executable instructions when executed further causing the system to: when the pair of words is a pair of co-hyponyms in the dictionary, determine the co-efficient value, wherein the co-efficient value is equal to or greater than 1.

23. The computer-readable non-transitory recording medium of claim 19, wherein minimizing the total sum of the difference value relates to an optimization based on a stochastic gradient descendant.

24. The computer-readable non-transitory recording medium of claim 19, wherein the first vector representation of the first word includes a multi-dimensional vector.