Many mobile work machines, such as compact utility loaders, are typically provided with a single power plant, such as an internal combustion engine, that powers multiple work functions. For example, the power plant can be used to propel the work machine via a traction system and can also be used to simultaneously power a work attachment. In some instances, the total load on the power plant can exceed the actual capacity of the power plant such that power to one or both of the traction system and the work attachment must be reduced. Control systems which allocate power under such conditions are known. However, such systems frequently increase cost and add complexity. Improvements are desired.
In general terms, this disclosure is directed to mobile work machines with active controls that vary available power to a traction system while minimizing engine stalling, maximizing the amount of work being achieved, and optimizing machine power for multiple different work scenarios. Various aspects are described in this disclosure, which include, but are not limited to, the following aspects.
In one example, a mobile work machine is provided with a prime mover supported by a chassis, a work attachment powered by the prime mover, and a traction system. In one aspect, the traction system can include a ground engagement assembly for propelling the chassis, a hydraulic pump driven by the prime mover, a hydraulic motor for driving the ground engagement assembly, the hydraulic motor being powered by the hydraulic pump, a user-operated traction control device for controlling a hydraulic fluid flow to a control input of the hydraulic pump, and a power reduction device for controlling a hydraulic fluid flow to the traction control device.
The mobile work machine can also include an electronic controller for operating the prime mover and the power reduction device. The electronic controller can be configured to operate the prime mover at a requested operating speed based on a user-selected input, monitoring an actual operating speed of the prime mover. In one aspect, the electronic controller can also be configured to execute a traction speed control algorithm when the actual operating speed of the prime mover relative to the requested operating speed meets a threshold condition in which the position of the power reduction device is operated by the electronic controller to reduce available fluid pressure to the traction control device without receiving an actual traction speed feedback signal at the electronic controller. Alternatively, or in addition, the electronic the traction speed control algorithm can include operating the position of the power reduction device to reduce available fluid pressure to the traction control device, wherein a commanded position of the power reduction control device is calculated by the electronic controller as a function of a requested prime mover operating speed demand reduced by a calculated adjustment factor.
In some examples associated with the first aspect, the hydraulic motor includes a first hydraulic motor for driving a first traction member of the ground engagement assembly and includes a second hydraulic motor for driving a second member of the ground engagement assembly.
In some examples, the hydraulic pump includes a first hydraulic pump and a second hydraulic pump, wherein the traction control device includes a first traction control device for controlling hydraulic fluid flow from the first hydraulic pump to the first hydraulic motor and includes a second traction control device for controlling hydraulic fluid flow from the second hydraulic pump to the second hydraulic motor.
In some examples, the power reduction device controls flow to both the first and second traction control devices.
In some examples, the power reduction device is a control valve assembly.
In some examples, the traction control device delivers hydraulic fluid used as pilot pressure to control the position of a swashplate of the hydraulic pump.
In some examples, the electronic controller prevents the traction speed control algorithm from being executed unless a qualifying condition is present.
In some examples, the qualification condition includes one or more of: a condition in which a speed command of the traction system is not null; a condition in which the speed command of the traction system is above a threshold value; a condition in which the actual operating speed of the prime mover is above a minimum threshold; a condition in which the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing but where the actual operating speed of the prime mover is decreasing by more than a deadband region; and a condition in which the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing but where the actual operating speed of the prime mover is outside of the deadband region.
In some examples, a commanded position of the power reduction device is calculated by the electronic controller as a function of a requested prime mover operating speed demand and a calculated adjustment factor.
In some examples, the mobile work machine is a compact utility loader with operator controls and a standing platform located at a rear end of the work machine.
In some examples, the prime mover is an internal combustion engine.
In some examples, the position of the power reduction control valve assembly is calculated without receiving an actual traction speed feedback signal at the electronic controller.
In some examples, a mobile work machine includes a prime mover supported by a chassis, a traction system, a work attachment powered by the prime mover, and an electronic controller. In one aspect, the traction system can include: a ground engagement assembly for propelling the chassis; a hydraulic motor for driving the ground engagement assembly; a user-operated traction control device for controlling hydraulic fluid flow to the hydraulic motor; and a power reduction device for controlling hydraulic fluid flow to the traction control device. In one aspect, the electronic controller can operate the prime mover and the power reduction device and is configured to: operate the prime mover at a requested operating speed based on a user-selected input; monitor an actual operating speed of the prime mover; and execute a traction speed control algorithm when the actual operating speed of the prime mover relative to the requested operating speed meets a threshold condition, in which the position of the power reduction device is operated by the electronic controller to reduce available fluid pressure to the traction control device, wherein a commanded position of the power reduction device is calculated by the electronic controller as a function of a requested prime mover operating speed demand reduced by a calculated adjustment factor.
In some examples, the position of the power reduction device is calculated without receiving an actual traction speed feedback signal at the electronic controller.
In some examples, the traction control device includes a first traction control device for controlling hydraulic fluid flow from a first hydraulic pump to a first hydraulic motor and includes a second traction control device for controlling hydraulic fluid flow from a second hydraulic pump to a second hydraulic motor, and wherein the power reduction device controls flow from the first and second hydraulic pumps to the first and second traction control devices.
In some examples, the power reduction device is a control valve assembly and the prime mover is one or both of an internal combustion engine and an electric motor.
In some examples, the traction control valve assembly delivers hydraulic fluid used as pilot pressure to control the position of a swashplate of the first and second hydraulic pumps.
In some examples, the electronic controller prevents the traction speed control algorithm from being executed unless a qualifying condition is present.
In one example, a method for controlling the speed of a mobile work machine having a prime mover powering a traction system and at least one work implement is presented. The method can include the steps of operating the prime mover at a requested operating speed based on a user-selected first input; operating the traction system based on a user-selected second input to a hydraulic traction control device; monitoring an actual operating speed of the prime mover; executing a traction speed control algorithm, when the actual operating speed of the prime mover relative to the requested operating speed meets a threshold condition, in which a position of a power reduction device is operated by the electronic controller to reduce available fluid pressure to the traction control device, wherein a commanded position of the power reduction control device is calculated by the electronic controller as a function of a requested prime mover operating speed demand reduced by a calculated adjustment factor.
In some examples of the method, a position of the power reduction control device is calculated without receiving an actual traction speed feedback signal at the electronic controller.
In some examples, the method can include preventing the traction speed control algorithm from being executed unless a qualifying condition is present, wherein the qualifying condition includes one or more of: a condition in which a speed command of the traction system is not null; a condition in which the speed command of the traction system is above a threshold value; a condition in which the actual operating speed of the prime mover is above a minimum threshold; a condition in which the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing but where the actual operating speed of the prime mover is decreasing by more than a deadband region; and a condition in which the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing but where the actual operating speed of the prime mover is outside of the deadband region.
Various embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts and assemblies throughout the several views. Reference to various embodiments does not limit the scope of the claims attached hereto. Additionally, any examples set forth in this specification are not intended to be limiting and merely set forth some of the many possible embodiments for the appended claims.
Referring to
In one aspect, the work machine 100 is provided with a chassis 102 supporting a power plant 104. In the example shown, the power plant 104 is an internal combustion engine. However, other types of power plants may be provided. For example, the power plant 104 can include one or more electric motors or can be configured as a hybrid power plant including an internal combustion engine and an electric motor. Other types of power plants are also possible.
The work machine 100 is also provided with a traction system 101 including a ground engagement assembly 106 that supports the chassis 102 and enables the work machine 100 to move over the ground. In one aspect, the ground engagement assembly 106 includes first and second ground engagement assemblies 106a, 106b mounted to opposite sides of the chassis 102. In the example shown, each of the ground engagement assemblies 106a, 106b is provided with a traction member 108a, 108b in the form of a track which is driven by power received from the power plant 102. Other types of ground engagement assemblies and traction members are possible. For example, the work machine 100 can be provided with wheels instead of tracks.
The work machine 100 is further provided with a work assembly 112 including a mounting assembly 114 to which a work attachment 116 can be attached.
With continued reference to
Referring to
As shown in
With continued reference to
With reference to
In one aspect, the smart power valve 200 is hydraulically located between the pump 142 and the traction control valve assembly 202. In this position, the smart power valve 200 can be operated to control fluid pressure and flow from the pump 142 to the traction control valve assembly 202, and more specifically to the swashplate pilot control inputs of the pumps 144, 146. When the traction control algorithm is executed, the smart power valve 200 is operated towards a closed position such that available hydraulic pressure and flow from the pump 142 to the traction control valve assembly 202 is reduced. This reduction in turn limits the extent to which the swashplates of the pumps 144, 146 can be operated and thus reduces the maximum output of the pumps 144, 146. This operation results in the reduction of the maximum load placeable on the power plant 104 from the pumps 144, 146 while also reducing the maximum output of the hydraulic motors 158, 160, and thus the maximum achievable ground speed of the work machine 100.
With continued reference to
With reference to
In a step 1010, the system verifies whether traction speed control has been enabled by the user. This step may be accomplished, for example, by providing a physical or virtual switch or button at the control panel 128 and verifying that the user has selected to enable traction control. The controller can also be provided with parameters for automatically enabling the traction speed control algorithm which can be used with or without a user input.
In another step 1012, a determination is made whether a qualifying condition exists. One example of a qualifying condition is one in which the speed command of the traction system is above a threshold value. Another example is a condition in which the actual operating speed of the prime mover is above a minimum threshold. Yet another example is a condition in which the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing but where the actual operating speed of the prime mover is decreasing by more than a deadband region. This is a condition where the prime mover is bogging down even though the operating speed command is increasing. A further example is a condition in which the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing but where the actual operating speed of the prime mover is outside of the deadband region. This condition prevents the traction control system from initiating in conditions where the requested prime mover operating speed is increasing and the actual prime mover operating speed is simply lagging behind rather than being in a bogging or loaded condition. The control system can be configured to require all of the above-identified qualifying conditions to be present before initiating the traction speed control algorithm. Other qualifying conditions are possible.
In a step 1014, the traction speed control algorithm is initiated and an output signal is sent by the controller to the traction speed control valve to reduce fluid pressure and flow to traction system using power plant RPM as the only feedback signal. In one example, the algorithm calculates an output signal to the traction speed control valve that includes a PID (proportional-integral-differential) calculation adjustment subtracted from the commanded power plant operating speed. The PID calculation adjustment can be a function of the difference between the actual and commanded prime mover operating speeds. As can be appreciated from the present disclosure, the traction speed control algorithm can be initiated and executed without reliance on a feedback from the traction system of relating to the actual ground speed of the work machine 100, thus reducing cost and complexity of the system.
Referring to
With the disclosed traction control system, work output is maximized while stalling of the power plant is minimized. Further, the disclosed traction speed control approach can be successfully utilized to optimize power distribution regardless of the type of work attachment mounted to the machine. For example, the same algorithm can be used with a snow thrower attachment and with a trencher attachment to successfully manage power plant loading. However, the traction control system can be provided with multiple traction control algorithms optimized for one or more particular work attachments. In such a case, the appropriate algorithm can be selected by the operator directly or automatically when the work attachment type is identified by or input into the system. Further, the traction speed algorithm can also be used when the power plant experiences loads unrelated to the work attachment, for example when the work machine is climbing an inclined surface.
In some implementations, the control panel 128 can include a user-operated input (e.g., knob, dial, keypad, touch screen, etc.) to set the maximum allowable traction speed and torque through operation of the smart power valve 200. In an aspect, such an input can be used in conjunction with the above-described algorithm and methods such that the input serves as an additional layer for limiting maximum power to the ground engagement assemblies below which the algorithm might ordinarily control the smart power valve 200. In some implementations, the input directly controls the position of the smart power valve 200 independent of the above-described algorithm, via the controller 500. In this latter instance, the operator may desire to reduce available power for other reasons that may not be associated with engine loading. For example, such functionality would be beneficial for making the machine react slower in tight or difficult spaces. Also, the reduced torque in the tracks would help prevent track or wheel slippage and ground damage, such as turf tearing or skid markings.
The various embodiments described above are provided by way of illustration only and should not be construed to limit the claims attached hereto. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize various modifications and changes that may be made without following the example embodiments and applications illustrated and described herein, and without departing from the true spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/376,029, filed Sep. 16, 2022, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63376029 | Sep 2022 | US |