(NOT APPLICABLE)
The invention relates to work platforms and, more particularly, to a work platform including an obstruction sensing system to reduce the possibility of collision with an obstruction or structure.
Lift vehicles including aerial work platforms, telehandlers such as rough terrain telescoping fork trucks with work platform attachments, and truck mounted aerial lifts are known and typically include an extendible flexible configuration boom, which may be positioned at different angles relative to the ground, and a work platform at an end of the boom. On or adjacent the platform, there is typically provided a control console including various control elements that may be manipulated by the operator to control such functions as boom angle, boom extension, rotation of the boom and/or platform on a vertical axis, engine or other type of power source, and where the lift vehicle is of the self-propelled type, there are also provided steering, drive speed and direction and braking controls.
A safety hazard can occur in a lift vehicle including a work platform when an operator is positioned between the platform and a structure that may be located overhead or behind the operator, among other places. Collision avoidance is also desirable with objects around the platform for example glass surfaces, aircraft structures, and other more fragile or delicate structures.
A camera sensor or the like may be mounted to the aerial work platform to observe the platform, the area around the platform, and the operator. The system processes data from the sensor to determine whether the operator is present and if the operator is in a proper operating position and also to determine the proximity of objects above, behind and to the sides of and below the platform. Based on data from the sensor, a control module permits, modifies or prevents operation and/or manipulation of the platform.
In an exemplary embodiment, a work platform is combined with a system for detecting obstacles. The work platform includes a control panel with operating components that control a position of the platform. The combined work platform and system include a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors at least one of an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and a processor receiving a signal from the sensor that processes the signal to determine at least one of a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform. A control module communicating with the processor and the operating components modifies control signals from the control panel based on communication with the processor.
The processor may determine that the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and the control module may be programmed to prevent operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform. An override switch may be connected with the control module, where the control module may be programmed to permit operation of the platform at very slow or creep speed based on activation of the override switch. The processor may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel, and the control module may be programmed to stop active functions and prevent further operation of the platform that would cause motion of the platform. The processor may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, and the control module may be programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform. The processor may determine that the operator is present and in a proper operating position and that there are no objects in the area around the platform, and the control module may be programmed to permit normal operation of the platform.
In one embodiment, the sensor may be programmed to distinguish the area around the platform between a warning zone and a danger zone, where the danger zone is closer to the platform than the warning zone. The processor may determine that an object is present in the warning zone, and the control module may be programmed to permit operation of the platform at creep speed based on the determination that the object is present in the warning zone. The processor may determine that an object is present in the danger zone, and the control module may be programmed to prevent operation of the platform based on the determination that the object is present in the danger zone. The sensor may be programmed to adjust a depth of at least one of the warning zone and the danger zone based on operating characteristics of the platform. Exemplary operating characteristics may include a number of operators on the platform, a direction in which the platform is traveling, and a speed of the platform. The control module may detect a speed of the platform, wherein the processor is programmed to process signals from the sensor relating to the platform speed toward one of the objects in the area of the platform. In this context, the control module may be programmed to slow active functions at a rate relative to the speed at which the platform is approaching the one of the objects in the area of the platform. The control module may be programmed to reduce a commanded operation speed based on a proximity to one of the objects in the area of the platform.
The sensor may include multiple sensing elements secured in the vicinity of the platform. In one arrangement, the platform may include a platform railing, where the sensor is mounted on the platform railing. The sensor may be one of an optical sensor, a radar sensor, and an acoustic sensor. The sensor may be attached to a manipulation device such as a pan and/or tilt mechanism or a mirror that displaces or rotates the sensor field of view.
In another exemplary embodiment, an aerial work platform includes a control panel including operator controls for manipulating the platform, a control module communicating with the operator controls and controlling manipulation of the platform based on signals from the control panel, and an obstruction sensing system. The obstruction sensing system includes a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform that monitors an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform, and a processor receiving a signal from the sensor that processes the signal to determine a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform. The control module is in communication with the processor and is programmed to modify control signals from the operator controls based on communication with the processor.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, a method of controlling an aerial work platform includes the steps of (a) monitoring with a sensor mounted in a vicinity of the platform an operator area, the platform, and an area around the platform; (b) detecting with a processor receiving a signal from the sensor a position of an operator on the platform and a proximity of objects in the area around the platform; and (c) a control module modifying control signals from an operator control panel based on communication with the processor and based on the detection in step (b). Step (c) may be practiced by preventing operation of the platform when an operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position. Step (b) may be practiced to determine whether the operator is leaning over a control panel for a predetermined period of time, and step (c) may be practiced by preventing operation of the platform during the predetermined period of time and after the predetermined period of time, reversing a last operating function of the platform. Step (c) may be practiced by permitting operation of the platform at creep speed when an object is detected in the warning zone, and by preventing operation of the platform when an object is detected in the danger zone.
These and other aspects and advantages will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The obstruction sensing system 20 may include multiple sensors 22 that are cooperable together and mounted in various areas in the vicinity of the platform 10. In an exemplary construction, the platform 10 includes a platform railing, and the sensor 22 is mounted on the platform railing. Mounting on the platform provides for a static view of the platform through the full range of boom articulation. Sensors may alternatively or additionally be mounted to boom structure to allow for a larger field of view of the platform and/or mounted to platform support structure other than the railing. For example, as shown, the sensor 22 may be mounted on a dedicated bracket 23 secured to the platform, or the sensor 22 may be secured adjacent the control panel 14.
With reference to
In some embodiments, the processor 24 determines whether the operator is not present or is not in a proper operating position, and if so, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10. That is, if the operator is not detected, the computer 24 sends a data message to the control module 26 that prevents motion or operation, or stops all active functions of the work platform 10. The system may also include an override button 28, where the platform 10 may be operated at creep speed if the override button 28 is activated.
The processor 24 may determine that the operator is leaning over the control panel 14, in which case, the control module 26 is programmed to prevent operation of the platform 10. If the processor 24 determines that the operator is leaning over the control panel for a predetermined time, the control module 26 is programmed to reverse a last operating function of the platform. In this instance, the system may also sound an alarm and turn on a warning beacon.
Indicator lamps 29 may be secured to the platform railing and around the control panel to communicate system status to the operator. Exemplary locations for the indicator lamps 29 are shown in
Because the processor 24 is interpreting shape and distance from an obstacle in real time, the processor 24 can be programmed to estimate direction and speed of movement of the platform in relation to recognized obstacles. The processor 24 can be programmed to take action even when those obstacles are outside of the warning zone 30. For example, the processor 24 can be programmed to signal the driving/control system 12 to slow down machine functions such as drive when the processor 24 recognizes that the operator is driving the machine at full speed in the direction of potential obstacle. As another example, the boom functions (or drive function) can be slowed down more aggressively if the processor determines that the machine is moving fast toward a collision point.
With reference to
Various methods may be used for reducing the platform speed based on detected object distance. In a “speed limiting” method, a limit for the maximum commandable speed is set based on the distance to the detected object (see, e.g.,
The zones may be adapted to speed and direction of machine movement. Zones can be adjusted to become deeper if it is determined that the machine is moving faster than a threshold speed, or the zones can be “deeper” in the main direction of travel when activating the swing or other direction function. The control module may adjust the sensors to penetrate deeper into the direction of the side of platform.
In a related context, the adaptive zones may incorporate proportional speed reduction zones as shown in
Communication between the sensor 22 and the processor 24 may be via digital packets (CANbus) or discrete signaling (digital or analog output). Other forms of digital communication may be used, allowing the sensor to provide information needed to evaluate environmental awareness. Examples include, without limitation, Ethernet, I2C, RS232/485, digital pulse width modulation (PWM), etc. The control module 26 interprets the data to determine if and how the machine should react to the sensor data. The processor 24 based on signals from the sensors 22 can determine if they need to be cleaned via a built-in test (BIT). The sensing elements 22 can be based on optical, radar or acoustic (ultrasonic) sensing. The sensing elements 22 can be a single device or multiple devices with the same or complementary technologies. This provides redundancy and tolerance to a range of environmental conditions, contamination on the sensors, and objects to be detected. Sensors may be passive (stereo camera, single camera) or active (light detection and ranging (LiDAR), laser detection and ranging (LADAR), 3D vision sensor), radar or acoustic (ultrasonic). Any suitable type of sensor(s) may be used, and the invention is not meant to be limited to the described exemplary embodiments. Alternative sensor arrangements that achieve the same functionality are also contemplated including, for example, sensors that react to an emitter (via electromagnetic waves or other signals), reflective tape (on the machine and/or incorporated into the operator's protective gear), etc.
With reference to
The platform and obstruction sensing system endeavor to avoid collisions between the moving platform and obstacles in the vicinity of the platform. The proactive system according to preferred embodiments is advantageous as compared to reactive systems that make adjustments after an obstacle has made contact with the operator and/or platform structure.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/885,720, filed May 16, 2013, pending, which is the U.S. national phase of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/066122 filed Dec. 20, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/424,888, filed Dec. 20, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/435,558, filed Jan. 24, 2011, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4754840 | MacDonald | Jul 1988 | A |
4917213 | Kessler | Apr 1990 | A |
4979588 | Pike et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5740887 | Unger | Apr 1998 | A |
5992562 | Boeckman | Nov 1999 | A |
6065565 | Puszkiewicz | May 2000 | A |
6595330 | Henrickson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6823964 | Goode | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842684 | Kade | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6880187 | Johnson | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7397351 | Rubin | Jul 2008 | B1 |
8813910 | Bowden | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9022160 | Smith | May 2015 | B2 |
9243412 | Gallette | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9586799 | Hao | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9676602 | Cummings | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9776847 | Mondal | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9783086 | Parker | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20030172598 | Greer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040173404 | Kobel | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050187712 | Callaghan | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050224439 | Bean | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070154063 | Breed | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080142713 | Breed | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144944 | Breed | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262682 | Bergsten | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090260920 | Cummings | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100068018 | Maguin | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100200332 | Bowden | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114405 | Elston | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133043 | Black et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100219018 | Knaak | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100289662 | Dasilva | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110046813 | Castaneda | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110166721 | Castaneda | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120078471 | Siefring | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152653 | Bowden | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120211301 | Clark | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130153333 | Richards | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197760 | Castaneda | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233645 | Hao | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130313040 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140324310 | Kobayashi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140332314 | Carrillo et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150008073 | Cummings et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150027808 | Baillargeon et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150144426 | Hao | May 2015 | A1 |
20150210115 | David | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150217981 | Baillargeon | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150368082 | Davis | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160075543 | Lombardo et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160221812 | Puszkiewicz | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160264131 | Chan | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160332856 | Steedley | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170008534 | Nakatsuka | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170021764 | Adams | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170107090 | Mondal | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170233232 | Davis | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170241155 | Johnson | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170255966 | Khoury | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170316696 | Bartel | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180022358 | Fung | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180022405 | Gecchelin | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2934193 | Aug 2007 | CN |
201665512 | Dec 2010 | CN |
202030492 | Nov 2011 | CN |
202379687 | Aug 2012 | CN |
204281238 | Apr 2015 | CN |
2 836 468 | Aug 2003 | FR |
3 000 200 | Dec 2012 | FR |
2481709 | Jan 2012 | GB |
2495158 | Apr 2013 | GB |
62-153098 | Jul 1987 | JP |
63-142400 | Sep 1988 | JP |
1-118987 | Aug 1989 | JP |
4-65299 | Jun 1992 | JP |
4-77600 | Jul 1992 | JP |
5-124800 | May 1993 | JP |
8-277099 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9-40381 | Feb 1997 | JP |
2003-221195 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2007-43383 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2011-63352 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2013-52948 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013-545693 | Dec 2013 | JP |
WO 2009037429 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2011015815 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2012001353 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012088091 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2014206982 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Mar. 31, 2015 issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2011349306, 3 pp. |
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2015 issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180053891.1 and English translation, 13 pp. |
European Search Report dated May 22, 2014 issued in European Patent Application No. 11852006.3, 8 pp. |
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-544880 and English Translation, 6 pp. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 24, 2012 issued in PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/066122, 4 pp. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 9, 2013 issued in PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/066122 8 pp. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 6, 2017 issued in European Patent Application No. 16198347.3, 9 pp. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,996, 32 pp. |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2017 issued in European Patent Application No. 17163943.8, 11 pp. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,996, 16 pp. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/094,286, 25 pp. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/610,996, 17 pp. |
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2018 issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,961,995, 5 pp. |
European Examination Report dated Oct. 18, 2018 issued in European Patent Application No. 16198347.3, 4 pp. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018 issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201710220836.6 and English translation, 19 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160075543 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61435558 | Jan 2011 | US | |
61424888 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13885720 | US | |
Child | 14950845 | US |