The invention relates to a work chamber system for the surface treatment of workpieces, comprising at least:
Certain types of workpiece surface treatments must be carried out in enclosed work chambers, for example painting or treatments with abrasive blasting agents. The treatment itself is carried out by program-controlled manipulators. Due to the high operating speed of the manipulators, the cycle times are not determined by the actual treatment time, but essentially by the placement of the workpieces in the work chamber and the mounting therein.
To reduce cycle times and to achieve high system throughput, a work chamber system of the kind mentioned above and offered for sale by the applicant provides for the workpieces to be mounted in workpiece holders that are already outside the work chamber. The surface treatment in the work chamber must be interrupted only briefly to move one of the rail-guided workpiece holders with the fully treated workpieces out of the work chamber, and to bring the other workpiece holder with the prepared workpieces into it. At their respective end sides, the workpiece holders have seal plates that tightly close the passages in the work chamber as soon as a workpiece holder has arrived either in the assembly position outside the chamber or in the work position inside the chamber.
This work chamber system has basically proven itself. However, one disadvantage arises in that the workpiece holders are guided on parallel rails, with one of the rails necessarily positioned closer to the manipulator than the other. Thus, there are different distances between the manipulator head with the paint or spray nozzles and the workpieces, depending on which one of the workpiece holders happens to be in the work chamber, such that the result of the work may turn out differently as well.
Although the problem can often be solved by two guide rails in that the manipulators are used in pairs, which are each arranged on one side of the group of adjacent guide rails and work in opposite directions. These then process the front and the rear side of the workpieces alternately. However, this entails a higher cost investment.
If the manipulator is mounted stationary and has as a first axis a rotation axis without being longitudinally movable along the guide rails, then difficulties can arise for it to reach the outer areas of the work area as defined by the outer frame of the workplace holder, especially if there is a greater distance to the workpiece holder.
More than two workpiece holders are required if the cycle times of the surface treatment, as compared to the set-up times for removing and mounting of workpieces, are very short. In this case, mounting is separated from removing by using a total of three workplace holders: One for the mounting of the raw workpieces, one for processing in the chamber and one for removing the finished treated workpieces outside the chamber. In this configuration, the disadvantages mentioned remain, even when using a pair of manipulators on opposite sides, because than even twice as large a distance exists between the respective outer guide rails than between two directly adjacent guide rails. Especially in tight work chambers and when using 6-axis articulated robots with their limited working space as manipulators, not all points of the work surface can be reached inside the workpiece holder, at least not at the right distance and in the required orientation of the manipulator head.
Known from U.S. Pat. No. 3,149,445 is a working chamber system with an outer frame guided on rails and being used to transfer work pieces individually or in transport boxes into the processing position.
However, this rail-like arrangement requires a large width and does not allow for prepared mounting of a workpiece in a defined position that then only needs to be moved into the work chamber.
Known from DE 27 47 107 A1 is a work chamber system, wherein the workpieces can be transferred to the processing position individually or on pallets via a roller conveyor and can be positioned inside the work chamber via a turntable. However, a frame-like arrangement, that allows the upright mounting of workpieces such that they can be placed frontally in the workspace of a manipulator, does not exist.
The objective of the present invention is therefore to improve a work chamber system of the aforementioned kind in such a way that regardless of the respective workpiece holder located in the work chamber, consistent distances can be established between the workpieces and the manipulators.
This objective is achieved according to the present invention in that at least one workpiece holder includes an outer frame, by which said workpiece holder is guided in the guide rails, and an inner frame that is surrounded by the outer frame in a transport position and can be moved, when in the assembly position and/or the working position, to a position beyond the base plane of the outer frame.
Pivoting out of the plane of the frame inside the working chamber has the advantage that the workpieces mounted in the inner frame can be moved at least to the plane of the directly adjacent guide rail.
Preferably, with a plurality of such workpiece holders that are guided on parallel rails, workpieces in a workpiece holder on the center guide rail can be relocated to the plane of an outer guide rail so that they are positioned closer to the manipulator. This is advantageous for only one-sided treatment by the manipulators on one side.
The parked position can assume a certain angle to the plane of the workpiece frame. However, positioning the inner frame in a plane-parallel position, that is exactly at the same position that an inner frame of the adjacent holder occupies, is particularly preferable. Thus, no conversions must be made for the rail in the program sequence of the manipulator.
If workpieces are treated simultaneously from two sides located opposite each other, it is advantageous to pivot the inner frame from the inserted work piece holders that have each been moved in on an outer guide rail each into the plane of the central guide rail. The workpieces are then always in the same, central plane during processing, regardless of the plane in which they were inserted into the work chamber.
Another advantage of the work chamber system according to the invention arises from the fact that the inner frames can be parked on the side outside the work chamber even during preparation and mounting. In this way, the operators can draw the inner frame closer to their own position so that they can perform the same manual steps during mounting and unclamping from the customary location.
It is particularly advantageous if the inner frame can be lowered relative to the outer frame when it is positioned outside the base plane of the outer frame, so that the operators can work in a comfortable position without steps.
It is preferably provided that the inner frame is connected pivotally via a parallelogram linkage to the outer frame. A parallelogram linkage is easy to manufacture and can be made robust. In addition, the kinematics is such that, when pivoted out of the plane of the outer frame, lowering occurs at the same time. In addition, the particular plane-parallel disengagement movement can therefore occur very quickly.
The advantages for ergonomics areas presented above. Set-up times are also improved by the fact that the inner frame can be coupled with the outer frame via a detachable connection. The operator can, for example, pivot out the inner frame and place it on a handcart. Then an inner frame can be used that has already been prepared in other work processes by other people. Populating the inner frame with workpieces, and the later removal of the finished workplaces therefrom, can thus also take place outside the actual work chamber system. Removability is advantageous also with a frequent change of workpiece types, since inner frames that have been adapted individually to the respective type of workpiece can be used.
Such a detachable connection can be effected in a structurally particularly simple manner, for example, in that the ends of the parallelogram linkages are formed as fork-shaped receptacles and in that pins that can be hung in the receptacles are provided at the vertical bars of the inner frame.
It is also advantageous if the inner frame can be rotated around a vertical axis. This can make mounting and unclamping of the workpieces outside the work chamber easier. By turning the inner frame, the respective rear side of the workpieces can also be treated by the same manipulator inside the work chamber. If the rotation of the inner frame is integrated in the program sequence of the manipulator, an additional degree of freedom is created in order to be able to reach, with the manipulator head, locations on the workpiece that are potentially difficult to access.
Reference is now made to the following detailed descriptions of exemplary embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying drawing. In detail, the Figures show:
In
In
Inside the work chamber 101 and for the workpiece holder 30, the inner frame 22 is placed towards the center guide rail 24 such that it has the same distance to both manipulators 102 and 103. Through the open outer frame 31, the bottom manipulator 103 acts upon the workpieces in the inner frame 32.
Clearly visible are the parallelogram linkages 23, which are mounted on the outer frame 11 of the left workpiece holder 10. Drive shafts 18 are connected to the carriage of the guide rails and allow the remotely operated, motor-driven adjustment of the inner frame 12 relative to the respective outer frame 11.
In
The particular advantages of the work chamber system according to the invention are apparent from
For the each of the workpiece holders 10 and 30 positioned at the outer guide rails, the inner frames 12 and 32 have been moved from their starting points, indicated by a dash-dot line, outward to the side and at the same time vertically downward using the parallelogram linkages 13 and 33. This allows the operators 106, 107 to place the inner frames 12, 32 on hand carts 104, 105 or the like and to entirely remove the workpiece holders 10, 30 by loosening the connection to the parallelogram linkages 13, 33.
Recognizable in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 051 168.7 | Jun 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2012/100172 | 6/6/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/7/2014 |