The present invention relates to worklights and is more particularly directed to switch arrangements for turning the worklight on and off.
Worklights have become popular for use in such varied settings as construction jobs, industrial plants, automotive and auto body repair shops, artist and photographic studios, and projects around the home. A typical worklight has one or two, or sometimes more, worklight heads that are supported on a base, which may be set on the floor or other work surface, mounted on a tripod, hung from a hook or mounted on a clamp that is in turn clamped to a supporting structure in the work area. Halogen worklights have become popular because they provide a lot of light, but they also generate a lot of heat, too. The lights are typically turned on by a push-button switch that is mounted on the back of the worklight head. Some worklight heads are capable of several light levels. For example, the head may include two halogen lamps and the user actuates the light by consecutively pushing on a push-button switch to energize, in sequence, a single lamp, both lamps and neither lamp.
The switch box is generally located at the rear of the worklight head, typically attached at the lower portion of the head as illustrated in
Although conventional, the use of such a switch arrangement is inconvenient at best and, more precisely, just plain awkward. The switch is not located in a very accessible position, and the switch mechanism can be fairly stiff. Users typically actuate the switch in one of several ways. In one approach the user grasps the switch and switch box between the thumb and one or two fingers, with the thumb on the top of the boot and the one or two fingers on the back of the switch box, and squeezes until the switch clicks. To achieve this, the user either leans over the worklight or stands to the side of or behind the worklight to gain sufficient access to locate the switch and orient the thumb and fingers properly, while guarding against contact with the hot surface of the worklight body. In another approach the user stands, kneels or bends so that the switch is visible and then simply pushes on the top of the boot with one finger—typically the index finger. This tends to hyperextend the distal interphalangeal joint causing discomfort at the least and for some users contributing to other future joint injury or repetitive stress injury. In any case the user sometimes has to stabilize the worklight by grasping the handle or base with the otherwise free hand so that the light does not slide when the switch is pushed.
Mounted on the back side of the housing, the switch box is typically out of the direct view of the user working in front of the light. The particularly bright light from a halogen worklight can also diminish, if not obscure altogether, the user's vision while reaching to shut off the light or change the light level. For a halogen lamp that has been operating for awhile, the exterior walls of the worklight head will become too hot for human touch, making it more difficult and potentially hazardous for an inattentive or less-than-careful user to reach around behind the light to turn it off. Moreover, finding and pushing the conventional push-button switch is made even more troublesome to the worker with a gloved hand. In addition to the problems of actuating the switch, the plastic boot 21 tends to deteriorate and crack with age, which effectively defeats the purpose of the boot. The plastic material tends to slide and rub against the end of the switch shaft every time the user pushes on the switch, leading to premature demise of the boot, which effectively limits the useful life of the worklight. The tendency of the plastic boot to slide or give under the user's finger when pressing the switch also makes for a mushy or spongy feel that is less than comfortable.
Notwithstanding the many inconveniences and deficiencies of the conventional worklight switch arrangement, the switch arrangement has nevertheless become the generally accepted standard. Over the years users have grown accustomed to these inconveniences and deficiencies, learned to tolerate them, and have come to accept them as inevitable and unavoidable.
The present inventors have refused to accept the inconveniences and deficiencies of the prior art as unavoidable. The present invention introduces a switch arrangement for a halogen worklight that is ergonomically designed for ease of use under realistic working conditions. As is customary, the worklight includes a switch housing attached to the worklight head and a push-action switch mounted in the switch housing for energizing one or more halogen lamps mounted in the worklight head. Briefly, an ergonomic switch according to the invention is operated by pressing on a switch button, which is formed to present an ergonomically sized engagement surface to the user. The size of the engagement surface is related to the typical size of a finger pad of the human hand. Through the simple expedient of providing a substantial switch button on the actuating shaft of the switch and sizing the engagement surface of the button to relate to the size of the human hand, the ease and comfort of operation of the worklight is dramatically improved over worklights having awkward switch mechanisms long thought in the prior art to be unavoidable. The switch button is structured and arranged with a guide assembly to provide stabile travel and a solid feel to the user when activating the switch.
Other aspects, advantages, and novel features of the invention are described below or will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following specifications and drawings of illustrative embodiments.
The embodiment of
A conspicuous feature of the push buttons 32, unlike worklight switches of the prior art, is the generous size of the surface area presented to the user. Each of the switch buttons 32 presents a significantly larger engagement surface to the user than the tip of the plastic boot 21 shown in
Thus to achieve the greater operability of the switch and the benefits of the invention, the switch button should have a minimal surface engagement area comparable with the minimal effective area of an exemplary user's finger pads. This is the case if the switch has minimum characteristic dimensions in the two perpendicular directions across the engagement surface of about five-eighths (0.625) inch. In the illustrated embodiment the engagement surface is circular, and the characteristic dimensions are equal and are simply the diameter of the circle. For rectangular buttons the characteristic dimensions may be taken to be the length and width. For other shapes of engagement surfaces the characteristic dimensions can be taken to be the effective length and width that a finger pad can effectively engage. Dimensions are referred to here as approximate, for example, about five-eighths inch, to allow for such practical factors as variations due to manufacturing tolerances or measurement uncertainties.
The minimum characteristic dimensions given above are approximately the typical effective size of the finger pad on the index finger. It is with this size of engagement surface that the button begins to achieve an ergonomic benefit in its performance. At this size the button relates to the dimensions of an adult human hand. With a slightly larger engagement surface, having characteristic dimensions of around seven-eighths (0.875) inch, the button is better sized to fit an exemplary gloved hand as well as the finger pad dimensions of a large human hand. It has been found that button performance is even more greatly improved with an even larger-sized engagement surface, having characteristic dimensions of at least about one and one-half (1.5) inch. At this size the user is able to locate the button by feel with less hunting and thus more quickly. This larger size provides for sufficient tactile feedback to the user to provide noticeably greater comfort and ease in locating the button and actuating the switch.
Because of the wider engagement surface presented to the user, a greater torque may be applied to switch shaft 39 when the button is depressed if the user should engage the button closer to the edge of the engagement surface than the middle. A guide assembly is provided to stabilize the travel of the switch button and plunger shaft as the button is pushed and counteract the greater torque. This reduces play, reduces or eliminates the tendency to bind, and gives the button a more solid feel to the user. The guide assembly in the embodiment shown in
Inner guide member 44 in
Where the engagement surface of the switch button has characteristic dimensions on the order of one and one-half (1.5) inch, it is desirable that the guide pathway along which the interengaging guide members move be spaced apart from the longitudinal axis of the plunger by at least about one-half (0.5) inch. This provides a particularly stabile travel for the button and a solid, reassuring feel to the user. In the embodiment of
Many worklights are designed for use in wet locations where they may be subject to accumulated moisture or are used outdoors, where they may be used under conditions of light precipitation. For such applications the switch mounting should not permit water to penetrate into the switch box or the switch itself. In the common prior art form of switch, the switch is protected against penetration of water by flexible plastic boot 21 covering the switch shaft as shown in
The above descriptions and drawings are given to illustrate and provide examples of various aspects of the invention in various embodiments. It is not intended to limit the invention only to these examples and illustrations. Given the benefit of the above disclosure, those skilled in the art may be able to devise various modifications and alternate constructions that although differing from the examples disclosed herein nevertheless enjoy the benefits of the invention and fall within the scope of the invention, which is to be defined by the following claims. Any limitation in the claims not expressly using the word “means” is not intended to be interpreted as a “means plus function” limitation in accordance with Title 35, United States Code, Section 112, and any claim limitation expressly using the word “means” is intended to be so interpreted.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3367206 | Moody | Feb 1968 | A |
4251703 | Hoeft et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4527030 | Oelsch | Jul 1985 | A |
4970631 | Marshall | Nov 1990 | A |
5140216 | Darr | Aug 1992 | A |
5201824 | Kato et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203448 | Osada et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5219446 | Klepac | Jun 1993 | A |
5256843 | Chiba et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5463538 | Womack | Oct 1995 | A |
5493482 | Bowen | Feb 1996 | A |
5617946 | Acampora et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5722533 | Gallone | Mar 1998 | A |
5746495 | Klamm | May 1998 | A |
6042043 | Wislinski | Mar 2000 | A |
6088531 | Endoh | Jul 2000 | A |
6575587 | Cramer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585400 | Leen | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604837 | Sandberg | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604847 | Lehrer | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6900404 | Searle et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6961519 | Wright | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965085 | Mario et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6979100 | Reiff et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7063444 | Lee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090381 | Kovacik et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7125140 | Koch et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7159993 | Lu | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7180024 | Sugita | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192160 | Reiff et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201491 | Bayat et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7306349 | Waters | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7370989 | Bayat et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20050117340 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070227871 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |