The present invention relates to high temperature superconductor magnets.
The challenge of producing fusion power is hugely complex. Many alternative devices apart from tokamaks have been proposed, though none have yet produced any results comparable with the best tokamaks currently operating such as JET.
World fusion research has entered a new phase after the beginning of the construction of ITER, the largest and most expensive (c15bn Euros) tokamak ever built. The successful route to a commercial fusion reactor demands long pulse, stable operation combined with the high efficiency required to make electricity production economic. These three conditions are especially difficult to achieve simultaneously, and the planned programme will require many years of experimental research on ITER and other fusion facilities, as well as theoretical and technological research. It is widely anticipated that a commercial fusion reactor developed through this route will not be built before 2050.
To obtain the fusion reactions required for economic power generation (i.e. much more power out than power in), the conventional tokamak has to be huge (as exemplified by ITER) so that the energy confinement time (which is roughly proportional to plasma volume) can be large enough so that the plasma can be hot enough for thermal fusion to occur.
WO 2013/030554 describes an alternative approach, involving the use of a compact spherical tokamak for use as a neutron source or energy source. The low aspect ratio plasma shape in a spherical tokamak improves the particle confinement time and allows net power generation in a much smaller machine. However, a small diameter central column is a necessity, which presents challenges for design of the plasma confinement magnet.
Superconducting materials are typically divided into “high temperature superconductors” (HTS) and “low temperature superconductors” (LTS). LTS materials, such as Nb and NbTi, are metals or metal alloys whose superconductivity can be described by BCS theory. All low temperature superconductors have a critical temperature (the temperature above which the material cannot be superconducting even in zero magnetic field) below about 30K. The behaviour of HTS material is not described by BCS theory, and such materials may have critical temperatures above about 30K (though it should be noted that it is the physical differences in superconducting operation and composition, rather than the critical temperature, which define HTS and LTS material). The most commonly used HTS are “cuprate superconductors”—ceramics based on cuprates (compounds containing a copper oxide group), such as BSCCO, or ReBCO (where Re is a rare earth element, commonly Y or Gd). Other HTS materials include iron pnictides (e.g. FeAs and FeSe) and magnesium diborate (MgB.sub.2).
ReBCO is typically manufactured as tapes, with a structure as shown in
The substrate 101 provides a mechanical backbone that can be fed through the manufacturing line and permit growth of subsequent layers. The buffer stack 102 is required to provide a biaxially textured crystalline template upon which to grow the HTS layer, and prevents chemical diffusion of elements from the substrate to the HTS which damage its superconducting properties. The silver layer 104 is required to provide a low resistance interface from the ReBCO to the stabiliser layer, and the stabiliser layer 105 provides an alternative current path in the event that any part of the ReBCO ceases superconducting (enters the “normal” state).
In addition, “exfoliated” HTS tape can be manufactured, which lacks a substrate and buffer stack, and instead has silver layers on both sides of the HTS layer. Tape which has a substrate will be referred to as “substrated” HTS tape.
In addition, “exfoliated” HTS tape can be manufactured, which lacks a substrate and buffer stack, and instead has silver layers on both sides of the HTS layer. Tape which has a substrate will be referred to as “substrated” HTS tape.
When describing coils in this document, the following terms will be used:
Two types of constructing for magnet coils from HTS tapes are considered—by winding a cable made of several tapes, or by assembling several sections of pre-formed HTS busbars. Wound coils, as shown in
Wound coils may be significantly easier to manufacture than coils assembled from jointed busbars, however there are some limitations. For example, in magnets with highly asymmetric field distributions around the coil, it is advantageous to “grade” the cables (or busbars) in the magnet, providing more HTS in regions of high field (and hence low critical current per tape) and less HTS in regions of low field (and hence high critical current per tape). Similarly the amount of HTS may be adjusted to compensate for the effect of the magnetic field direction relative to the ab-plane of the ReBCO crystal, with more HTS (in the form of additional tapes) being provided as the field angle moves out of the ReBCO ab-plane. This is clearly not possible in a coil continuously wound from a single, uniform cable, as the amount of HTS in any given cross section through the coil will be the same around the whole coil (to within a single cable cross section).
Sectional coils can be easily made with graded cables/busbars—simply by providing different amounts of HTS in each section or at different points in each section. However, the joints required for sectional coils present a significant electrical and mechanical engineering challenge, as their resistance must be minimised, they will often be subject to large mechanical loads, and they may require precise alignment. In addition, a sectional coil will always have more resistance than an equivalent wound coil, due to the joints, since all the current has to pass from the HTS in one cable/busbar, through a short distance of resistive material (such as copper) at the joint, and then back into HTS in the second cable/busbar; It is known that the resistance of the ReBCO-Ag interface inside individual HTS tapes represents the limiting factor in the design of HTS cable/busbar joints.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing a high temperature superconducting, HTS, coil, the method comprising:
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing a high temperature superconducting, HTS, coil, the method comprising:
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a high temperature superconducting, HTS, coil comprising:
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided a high temperature superconductor, HTS, coil comprising an HTS coil cable arranged to form a spiral having a plurality of turns, wherein the HTS coil cable comprises at least one HTS shunt cable arranged between HTS tapes of the HTS coil cable along an arc of the HTS coil cable such that current can be shared between the HTS shunt cable and the HTS coil cable.
Further embodiments are presented in claim 2 et seq.
A coil construction will now be described which allows the use of grading (i.e. variable amounts of HTS in different parts of the coil) for a wound coil, particularly a pancake coil. Such a construction is of particular use for coils which would have a significantly asymmetric magnetic field when in use, be subject to a significantly asymmetric external field and/or be subject to a significant temperature gradient. For example, such a construction is particularly useful in the toroidal field (TF) coil of a tokamak, where the parts of the toroidal field coil which pass through the central column experience considerably higher magnetic field than the return limbs, and hence require considerably more HTS to carry the same transport current than the parts in the outer sections of the return limbs. The angle between the magnetic field and the ab-plane of the ReBCO must also be considered when choosing the number of HTS tapes required to carry the transport current, so the TF magnet design is complex.
Grading is desirable for two reasons: (a) to minimise the amount of (expensive) HTS needed, and (b) to keep all parts of the coil at a similar fraction of critical current. The second reason is important because it ensures that the temperature margin of the coil is similar at all positions, facilitating a more uniform quench when the magnet has to be rapidly shut down by heating the coils.
The manufacture of such a coil is similar to that of a conventional wound HTS coil.
Additional components, such as sensors, coolant channels, or heaters for inducing quenches may be wound into the coil in other arcs, in a similar manner to the shunts, except that such additional components may or may not require electrical contact to the main HTS coil.
The HTS shunts may be made from a cable with the same structure (i.e. number and arrangement of tapes) as that of the main HTS coil, or they may be made from a cable with a different structure. HTS shunts between different turns may have different structures or be made from HTS manufactured by different methods, with varying performance and dimensions.
There will be some resistance between the main HTS coil and the HTS shunts, but this will be very low as current can transfer to or from the shunts along their whole length. This is also true if the coil is provided without insulation, such that current can enter the shunts from either side—though the resistance on the substrate side of the HTS shunt would be higher than that on the HTS side. As such, when the current in the coil is such that if the critical current of the main HTS coil alone is not sufficient in the arc with the shunts to carry the transport current, then excess current will be easily shared to the HTS shunts. At currents less than the critical current of the main HTS coil in the graded region, the vast majority of the current will primarily flow in the wound HTS coil. As the wound coil current approaches the critical current of the parts of the coil experiencing higher magnetic field (or higher temperature, or magnetic field angle less well aligned with the c-axis of the ReBCO HTS layer), the HTS will generate a voltage which will drive excess current through the small resistance between the main coil and the shunt. The voltage generated per metre of HTS (E.sub.HTS) is given by
where E.sub.0=1.mu.V/cm is the defined critical current criterion, I.sub.c is the critical current of the tape at this criterion, and n is an experimental parameter that models the sharpness of the superconducting to normal transition; n is typically in the range 20-50 for ReBCO. Depending on the value of n, the voltage is negligible for values of .alpha.=I/I.sub.c less than about 0.8. The excess current above the local critical current will be shared into the shunt. This will happen with minimal dissipation, and the small amount of heat generated will be accommodated by the design of the coil cooling system. The number of shunts, and the number of tapes in each shunt, can be chosen based on the amount of HTS needed to keep the ratio .alpha. approximately the same in all parts of the coil. The cable used for the main HTS coil and the cable used for the HTS shunts may have the same structure (e.g. number and arrangement of tapes), or may have different structures.
Where shunts are provided along an arc of the coil, they may be provided evenly to all tapes of the coil tape (e.g. each turn of the coil tape may have an HTS shunt comprising two tapes), or the distribution of the shunts may vary across the coil cross section (e.g. providing shunts to every turn towards the outside of the central column for a TF coil, and providing shunts only to every other turn and/or shunts with fewer HTS tapes for turns towards the inside of the central column of a TF coil, as the magnetic field is lower).
This may be achieved by forming the cable during the same process as winding the cable around the former, e.g. by providing one or more spools of HTS tape, which are brought together to form a cable, which is then wound around the former in a continuous process. The HTS shunts and substituted metal layers may then be added between the HTS tapes as a part of this process.
Additionally,
The core of a spherical tokamak requires high current density in the TF coils, to minimise the space taken by windings and maximise the space available for neutron shielding. This is less important in the return limbs, where conductors can be spread out to reduce the field seen by any conductor from its near neighbours. As illustrated schematically in
Current transfer is easiest (i.e. the resistance is lower) where an HTS layer of the main coil cable faces an HTS layer of a shunt (i.e. the outer cables of the coil cable and shunt cable form a type-0 pair). As such, the HTS cables of the main coil cable and each shunt may be formed such that the outer HTS tapes of the cable have HTS layers facing outward from the cable.
The coil may be wound as a double pancake coil—i.e. with two coils wound in opposite sense and connected at their inner terminals. The connection can be a resistive joint, but it is possible to avoid a joint completely by winding the pair from a single length of cable, as known in prior art. The arrangement of HTS shunts in the two coils may be the same (as they are exposed to substantially the same conditions), but the heaters, sensors, and other components inserted into the coil may vary.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1801603 | Jan 2018 | GB | national |
1817159 | Oct 2018 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/965,801, filed Jul. 29, 2020, which is a national phase filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2019/050245 filed on Jan. 30, 2019, which claims priority to Great Britain Patent Application No. 1801603.0 filed on Jan. 31, 2018, and Great Britain Patent Application No. 1817159.5 filed on Oct. 22, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4151498 | Katsurai | Apr 1979 | A |
20120065074 | Xie et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140211900 | Kingham et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20160232988 | Sykes | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20200194154 | Markiewicz | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200335230 | Brittles | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200381154 | Slade | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2418069 | Mar 2006 | GB |
2016163026 | Sep 2016 | JP |
2017042543 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2018078326 | May 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report issued by the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office for Application No. 1801603.0 dated Jul. 18, 2018 (4 pages). |
Search Report issued by the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office for Application No. 1817159.5 dated Apr. 24, 2019 (3 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB/2019/050245, dated Mar. 28, 2019 (13 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/GB2019/050245 dated Jan. 9, 2020 (14 pages). |
Bromberg et al., “Current distribution and re-distribution in HTS cables made from 2nd generation tapes,” AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, vol. 1434, pp. 1001-1008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220215994 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16965801 | US | |
Child | 17701181 | US |