Wrapper for smoking article, smoking article, and method of making same

Abstract

Stabilization and demobilization of volatile organic and volatile inorganic acids by acid adsorption onto activated carbon, which is then used in the manufacture of wrappers for smoking articles, provides improvements in sidestream smoke aroma, reduction in sidestream smoke irritation and improvements in subjective taste of the mainstream smoke.

Description

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to improved wrappers for smoking articles, the method of making such wrappers, and to smoking articles made from such wrappers.

A purpose of this invention is to provide improved subjective taste properties to smoking articles where the tobacco column is wrapped in reduced sidestream smoke cigarette papers.

Reduced sidestream smoke cigarette papers have good appearance and high opacity which, when fabricated into cigarettes and other smoking articles with suitable tobacco columns and filter systems, statically burn at acceptable rates and produce up to 75% less particulate sidestream smoke than do cigarettes and other smoking articles fabricated with conventional wrappers. Furthermore, desirable improvements in subjective properties of cigarettes and other smoking articles are accomplished by incorporating into the wrapper furnish activated carbon which has a volatile acid adsorbed onto the carbon. Adsorption of the acids onto the carbon prevents the acids from migrating and reacting with the basic fillers (i.e. magnesium hydroxide and/or calcium carbonate) which may also be present in the wrapper furnish. Therefore, when cigarettes or other smoking articles are produced with wrappers containing the carbon adsorbed acids, the acids are directly released, as determined by gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis (GC/MS analysis), into both the mainstream smoke and sidestream smoke via a heat-release mechanism as the smoking article is consumed. The resulting acid-enhanced mainstream smoke taste is significantly improved, the sidestream smoke irritation is reduced, and the sidestream aroma is improved.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The reduced cigarette sidestream smoke papers or wrappers, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,231,377 Cline et al.; 4,420,002 Cline; 4,433,697 Cline et al.; 4,450,847, Owens; and 4,881,447 Martin use high levels of basic fillers [MgO/Mg(OH).sub.2 and CaCO.sub.3 ] to achieve reductions in the sidestream smoke of smoking articles. The filler concentrations in these papers are typically in the range of 14 to 60 grams per square meter, which is significantly higher than the 6 to 9 grams per square meter in regular cigarette paper. The high basis weights of these reduced sidestream smoke wrappers (typically 35 to 100 g/m.sup.2) and the resultant thickness increase, along with the "heat sink" effect caused by the thermal breakdown of magnesium hydroxide (shown in equation 1 below), cause an increased condensation of the smoke on the inside surface of the paper and within the paper structure itself. This smoke normally would penetrate through regular cigarette paper and form the typical sidestream smoke plume observed with regular smoking articles. ##STR1##

The increased tar condensation on the inside surface of the cigarette paper and in the internal structure of the cigarette paper itself, along with the significantly higher level of basic fillers [MgO/Mg (OH).sub.2 and CaCO.sub.3 ] in the reduced cigarette sidestream smoke papers, results in a greater reaction of acidic smoke components with the basic fillers in the reduced sidestream smoke papers versus regular cigarette papers. This reaction results in nonvolatile tar components being formed which are not revolatilized back into the mainstream smoke but are pyrolyzed to lower molecular weight smoke components.

Extensive subjective taste studies have shown the taste characteristics of smoking articles wrapped in reduced sidestream smoke papers to have objectional taste characteristics relative to regular smoking articles. Additional studies have also shown the pH of the mainstream smoke of tobacco columns wrapped in reduced sidestream smoke cigarette paper is higher than that of the same tobacco columns wrapped in regular cigarette paper. The subjective taste characteristics of cigarettes wrapped in reduced sidestream smoke cigarette paper are similar to that obtained when the pH of mainstream smoke of regular cigarettes is artificially increased.

PRIOR ART

U.S. Pat. No. 3,744,496, assigned to Olin Corporation, discloses a carbon-filled paper to wrap cigarettes and/or cigars, preferably used as an innerliner, with an outer wrap of regular cigarette paper or cigar wrapper.

U.S. patent application Ser. No. 656,497, Owens, reveals the use of activated carbon and/or flavored activated carbon as part of the furnish of reduced sidestream smoke wrappers for smoking articles. Treatment of reduced sidestream smoke wrappers for smoking articles with organic acids to reduce the basic character (pH) of the surface of the low sidestream paper is revealed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 514,533, Owens, filed April 26, 1990. The acids disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 514,533, Owens, react with the basic fillers [Mg(OH).sub.2 and CaCO.sub.3 ] of the paper to form non-volatile salts which do not produce the positive taste characteristics of the free acids when these treated papers are used to produce smoking articles which are subsequently smoked.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It has been found that by adsorbing volatile organic acids and volatile inorganic acids onto activated carbon, which is subsequently used as part of the furnish of smoking article wrappers which may contain other fillers such as magnesium hydroxide and calcium carbonate, an enhancement in sidestream smoke aroma, a reduction in sidestream smoke irritation and an enhancement of the mainstream smoke taste characteristics are afforded.

The improved wrappers may be used as a single outer wrap or as an inner liner with regular smoking article wrappers as the outer wrap, or the improved wrapper may be used as both the inner and outer wrappers of smoking articles.

Also, by adsorbing the volatile acids onto the carbon, the acids are no longer free to volatilize and/or migrate to other parts of the smoking article during storage. As with U.S. patent application Ser. No. 656,497, Owens, filed Feb. 19, 1991 (activated carbon filled, low sidestream smoke paper), the acid-treated carbon gives a greater reduction in sidestream smoke (see Table I) than is obtained over magnesium hydroxide/calcium carbonate filled, reduced sidestream smoke wrappers, while producing a significant improvement in ash properties. The taste properties of the acid-treated carbon, reduced sidestream smoke wrappers are significantly improved over taste properties obtained in the teachings of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 656,497, Owens, filed Feb. 19, 1991 (activated carbon filled, low sidestream smoke paper). The resulting cigarette is distinctly light to dark grey in color, depending on the particle size and level of carbon in the paper.

The novel findings in this invention are the stabilization and improvements in sidestream smoke aroma, the reduction in sidestream smoke irritation, and the further improvement in subjective taste properties of cigarettes and other smoking articles wrapped in papers containing the acid-treated carbon.

______________________________________PARAMETERS OF THE INVENTION(All percentages based on the basis weight of the paper)______________________________________Carbon content: 2.0% to 60%Preferred 5.0% to 25%Magnesium Hydroxide content: 0.0% to 35%Preferred 0.0% to 20%Calcium Carbonate content: 0.0% to 40%Preferred 0.0% to 30%Basis Weight: 25 gm/m.sup.2 to 100 gm/m.sup.2Preferred 35 gm/m.sup.2 to 65 gm/m.sup.2Porosity: 1 to 100 CorestaPreferred 5 to 20 CorestaBurning Chemical: alkali metal salts of organic and inorganic acids selected from the group consisting of citric, malic, lactic, glycolic, tartaric, fumaric, maleic, malonic, glutaric, adipic, acetic, succinic, phosphoric, hydrochloric, and sulfuricBurning Chemical Addition Rate: 0.5% to 10.0%Acids: Volatile organic acids, such as acetic, propionic, butyric, isovaleric, valeric, beta methyl valeric, and volatile inorganic acids, such as phosphoric, sulfuric, and hydrochloricAcid Addition Rate: 0.01% to 5.0%Preferred 0.20% to 2.0% for organic acids 0.01% to 0.2% for inorganic acidsSugar Addition: 0.0% to 10% mono-, di-, tri- or poly-saccharides.Flavorant: Flavors adsorbed on carbon can be used for further enhancement of taste and aroma characteristics in combination with acid- treated carbonSmoking Articles: Cigarettes, cigars, and the like.______________________________________ TABLE I______________________________________Sidestream Smoke Reduction Properties of Cigarettes*Containing Acid Treated Activated Carbon Sidestream Tar % SidestreamSheet Structure Generation Rate Reduction______________________________________Control - regular cigarette 2.2 mg/min --paper25 gm/m.sup.2, 30% CaCO.sub.325 CORESTA Porosity45 gm/m.sup.2, 40% CaCO.sub.3 1.36 mg/min 3810 CORESTA Porosity45 gm/m.sup.2, 11% acetic acid- 1.12 mg/min 49treated activated carbon, 30%CaCO.sub.310 CORESTA Porosity45 gm/m.sup.2, 11% acetic acid- 0.77 mg/min 65treated activated carbon, 10%gel Mg(OH).sub.2,20% CaCO.sub.310 CORESTA Porosity______________________________________ *Tobacco column: 100 mm Commercial Light 100's TABLE II______________________________________(All Percentages Based on the Basis Weight of the Paper)Subjective Taste Evaluations of CigarettesWrapped in Paper Containing Acid-Treated Activated Carbon______________________________________Acid TypeAcid-Treated Activated CarbonActivated Carbon - GX248 North American Carbon, Inc.From: 432 McCormick Boulevard Columbus, Ohio 43213To 10 parts of activated carbon is added 1.0 part of the volatileacid with mixing. The carbon/acid mixture is left for a minimumof 24 hours in a closed container at room temperature beforebeing used as a handsheet filler component.Paper Composition Containing Acid-Treated Activate CarbonAcid-Treated Activated Carbon 11% by weightCalcium Carbonate 20% by weightMagnesium Hydroxide (as per U.S. Pat. 10% by weightNo. 4,881,447)Refined Flax Fiber 59% by weightPorosity 10 cm/min CORESTABasis Weight 45 gm/m.sup.2Burning Chemical TreatmentAbove base paper treated to contain 5.6% tri potassium citrateTobacco ColumnCommercial Blended Lights 100'sAcid Taste Aroma______________________________________None-Control Harsh, lingering, chalky Strong harsh, cigar-like mouth coating/aftertasteAcetic Very mild, no lingering Mild, normal cigarette after taste, or mouth coatingButyric Very mild, no lingering Mild, normal cigarette aftertaste or mouth type coating, fatty/buttery low eye/nasal irritation taste, slightly sweetIso valeric Very mild, no lingering Mild, normal cigarette(3 methyl aftertaste or mouth typebutyric) coating, tobacco-like low eye/nasal irritation flavor notes, sweet notes sweetBeta methyl very mild, no lingering Mild, normal cigarettevaleric aftertaste or mouth type(3 methyl coating, strong tobacco- low eye/nasal irritation,valeric) like flavor notes, sweet/ floral/sweet floral flavor notesLevulinic mild, no lingering after- Mild, normal cigarette taste or mouth coating, type slight tobacco-like flavor notesPhosphoric Mild, bitter, slight bitter Mild, normal cigarette aftertaste type low eye/nasal irritationCitric.sup.1 Slight reduction in Strong, harsh, some harshness, some cigar-like notes remaining aftertaste and mouth coatingMalic.sup.1 Slight reduction in Strong, harsh, some harshness, some cigar-like notes remaining aftertaste and mouth coating______________________________________ Table II Note GC/Mass Spec analyses show free acid is released on heating from the acidtreated activated carbons when volatile acids, such as acetic, butyric, isovaleric, beta methyl valeric, and levulinic are used, whereas no detectable free acid is observed when nonvolatile acids, such as citri and malic are used to treat the activated carbon. Data presented in Table II above shows the carbon treated with volatile acid when incorporated into a cigarette wrapper improves the mildness of mainstream smoke, while reducing the irritancy of the sidestream smoke. Nonvolatile acids, such as citric and malic, show no significant improvements in these taste properties. .sup.1 To 10 parts GX248 Carbon was added a solution of 1 part acid, dissolved in 3 parts of water, and allowed to stand a minimum of 24 hours at room temperature before using as a handsheet filler. TABLE III______________________________________(All Percentages Based on the Basis Weight of the Paper)Subjective Taste Evaluations of CigarettesWrapped in Paper Containing Acid-Treated Activated Carbon______________________________________Acid Type/ConcentrationAcid-Treated Activated CarbonActivated Carbon - GX248 North American Carbon, Inc.From: 432 McCormick Boulevard Columbus, Ohio 43213Mix sufficient quantity of the volatile acid with activated carbonto yield the desired level of volatile acid in the paper, based onthe paper being 10% activated carbon. The carbon/acid mixtureis left for a minimum of 24 hours in a closed container at roomtemperature before being used as a handsheet filler component.Paper Composition Containing Acid-Treated Activate CarbonActivated Carbon 10%Volatile acid as requiredCalcium Carbonate 20%Magnesium Hydroxide (as per U.S. Pat. 10%No. 4,881,447)Refined Flax Fiber remaining %Porosity 10 cm/min CORESTABasis Weight 45 gm/m.sup.2Burning Chemical TreatmentAbove base paper treated to contain 5.6% tri potassium citrate.Tobacco ColumnCommercial Blended Lights 100's % inAcid Paper Taste Aroma______________________________________None- 0.0 Harsh, lingering, chalky Strong, harsh,control aftertaste, mouth coating cigar-likeAcetic 0.01 Reduced harshness, Strong, harsh, slight mouth coating cigar-like 0.1 Mild, no aftertaste or Normal cigarette mouth coating 1.0 Very Mild, no lingering Mild, normal aftertaste or mouth cigarette coating 2.0 Very mild, slightly Very mild, reduced bitter, no aftertaste or eye/nasal irritation mouth coating 5.0 Bitter, very mild, slight Very mild, reduced bitter aftertaste eye/nasal irritationBeta 0.02 Greatly reduced Normal cigarettemethyl harshness, no aftertaste,valeric no mouth coating(3 methyvaleric) 0.05 Mild, no aftertaste or Normal cigarette mouth coating, enhanced tobacco taste 0.1 Very mild, no aftertaste Mild, normal or mouth coating, cigarette enhanced tobacco taste 0.5 Very mild, no aftertaste Mild, reduced or mouth coating, eye/nasal irritation greatly enhanced tobacco taste 1.0 Very mild, no lingering Mild, normal aftertaste or mouth cigarette type, coating-strong tobacco- low eye/nasal like flavor notes, irritation, sweet/floral flavor notes floral/sweet 2.0 Very mild, slightly Mild, normal bitter, no lingering cigarette type, aftertaste or mouth low eye/nasal coating, strong irritation, tobacco-like flavor floral/sweet notes, sweet/floral flavor notesPhos- 0.01 Mild, greatly reduced Normal cigarette,phoric aftertaste and mouth reduced eye/nasal coating irritation 0.1 Very mild, no aftertaste Normal cigarette, or mouth coating reduced eye/nasal irritation 1.0 Mild, bitter, slight Mild, normal bitter aftertaste cigarette type, low eye/nasal irritation______________________________________ Data presented in Table III above shows the level of acid treatment of th carbon can greatly impact the subjective taste properties of the mainstream and sidestream smoke. Carbon treatment to give levels of acid in the sheet as low as .01% to .1% can be very effective in achieving significant improvements in mainstream taste and sidestream aroma.

Claims

1. A wrapper for smoking articles comprising a cellulosic fiber sheet containing inorganic fillers and activated carbon, the activated carbon having adsorbed thereon volatile organic acids prior to its incorporation into the cellulosic fiber sheet so that said volatile acids are no longer free to migrate to other parts of a smoking article during storage.

2. A wrapper for smoking articles comprising a cellulosic fiber sheet containing inorganic fillers and activated carbon, the activated carbon having adsorbed thereon volatile inorganic acids prior to its incorporation into the cellulosic fiber sheet so that said volatile acids are no longer free to migrate to other parts of a smoking article during storage.

3. The wrapper, as defined in claim 1, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 5.0%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

4. The wrapper, as defined in claim 1, having an acid addition rate of 0.20% to 2.0%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

5. The wrapper, as defined in claim 2, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 5.0%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

6. The wrapper, as defined in claim 2, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 0.2% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

7. The wrapper, as defined in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein the activated carbon content is from about 2.0% to 60%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

8. The wrapper, as defined in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6, wherein the activated carbon content is from about 5.0% to 25%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

9. A smoking article, comprising a cellulosic fiber sheet containing inorganic fillers and activated carbon, the activated carbon having adsorbed thereon volatile organic acids prior to its incorporation into the cellulosic fiber sheet so that said volatile acids are no longer free to migrate to other parts of the smoking article during storage, wrapped about a tobacco charge.

10. A smoking article, comprising a cellulosic fiber sheet containing inorganic fillers and activated carbon, the activated carbon having adsorbed thereon volatile inorganic acids prior to its incorporation into the cellulosic fiber sheet so that said volatile acids are no longer free to migrate to other parts of the smoking article during storage, wrapped about a tobacco charge.

11. The smoking article, as defined in claim 9, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 5.0% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

12. The smoking article, as defined in claim 9, having an acid addition rate of 0.20% to 2.0% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

13. The smoking article, as defined in claim 10, having an acid addition rate of 0.1% to 5.0%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

14. The smoking article, as defined in claim 10, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 0.2%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

15. The smoking article, as defined in claims 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14, wherein the activated carbon content is from about 2.0% to 60% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

16. The smoking article, as defined in claims 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14, wherein the activated carbon content is from about 5.0% to 25%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

17. A method for reducing the visible sidestream smoke and subjective taste characteristics of a smoking article, comprising wrapping the tobacco charge in a combustible cellulosic sheet containing inorganic fillers and activated carbon and adsorbing on the carbon a volatile organic acid prior to its incorporation into the cellulosic sheet so that said volatile acid is no longer free to migrate to other parts of the smoking article during storage.

18. A method for reducing the visible sidestream smoke and subjective taste characteristics of a smoking article, comprising wrapping the tobacco charge in a combustible cellulosic sheet containing inorganic fillers and activated carbon and adsorbing on the carbon a volatile inorganic acid prior to its incorporation into the cellulosic sheet so that said volatile acid is no longer free to migrate to other parts of the smoking article during storage.

19. The method, as defined in claim 17, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 5.0%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

20. The method, as defined in claim 17, having an acid addition rate of 0.20% to 2.0% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

21. The method, as defined in claim 18, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 5.0% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

22. The method, as defined in claim 18, having an acid addition rate of 0.01% to 0.2% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

23. The method, as defined in claims 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22, wherein the activated carbon content is from about 2.0% to 60%, based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

24. The method, as defined in claims 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22, wherein the activated carbon content is from about 5.0% to 25% based on the basis weight of the fiber sheet.

25. The smoking article, as defined in claim 10, wherein the treated fiber sheet comprises an inner wrapper for said tobacco charge.

26. The smoking article, as defined in claim 10, wherein the treated fiber sheet comprises an outer wrapper for said tobacco charge.

27. The smoking article, as defined in claim 10, wherein the treated fiber sheet comprises both an inner and outer wrapper for said tobacco charge.