The present invention relates to workpiece engaging apparatus, and more particularly to wrenches of various types, including socket wrenches. The present invention is intended to improve upon the invention disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,290,467, entitled a “Socket Wrench Apparatus,” by the same inventor. In addition to providing improvements to the socket wrench apparatus shown in that prior patent, the present invention is intended to allow the teachings of that prior patent to be more readily adapted to wrenches and tool or workpiece holders of other types and configurations.
The teachings and content of the '467 are expressly incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein as well. In particular, the present invention teaches the use of a different web/cam pin assembly, which can be used in place of that shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 of the '467 patent. The general purpose, structure, and function of the invention are the same as that described in the '467 patent, except as is indicated herein.
Briefly, and by reference to the '467 patent, the web/cam pin assembly of that patent included a web 36 formed of resilient material, such as the plastic material indicated in that '467 patent, which connected to and retained longitudinally extending members 40, typically referred to as cam pins or longitudinal arms. These arms 40 included notches or reduced areas 42, intermediate the ends of the arms, which served to allow web 36 to hold the arms in place. The overall orientation of the web/cam pin assembly was as a longitudinally extending cylinder about axis AA, as shown in
Commercial embodiments of the invention taught by the '467 patent have been successful and widely adopted. However, experience through the years of such products has shown that in certain instances the invention does not work as well as would be desired. For example, it has been found to be not uncommon practice for workers faced with extensively rusted or corroded bolts to first attempt to loosen the bolt by heating it with a torch or similar device. Once so heated, the bolt (and/or a nut attached to it) retains that heat for a significant period of time. When wrenches using the invention of the '467 patent are then applied to the heated workpiece (either to the bolt head or the nut), a substantial thermal gradient exists between the temperature of the workpiece and the temperature of the wrench. That thermal gradient has been found, on occasion, to be sufficient to degrade the performance of the plastic web holding the cam pins or arms in place, occasionally to the point of even melting or burning the web up and allowing the arms to fall out of the wrench after the workpiece is removed.
Obviously, the same problem could theoretically occur as a result of merely using wrenches of that type in elevated temperatures where the thermal gradient was zero, except that such wrenches are not normally stored at such elevated temperatures or readily used in such environments. However, the reverse problem has been noted as a potential, i.e., when wrenches of the type taught by the '467 patent are used a substantially lower temperatures than the particular plastic selected for use as web 36 was designed for. This could occur, for example, in extreme Northern climates or during periods of substantially lower than normal outdoor temperatures, where the plastic material of web 36 could become brittle or have substantially reduced elasticity.
Also, the construction of the wrench taught by the '467 patent, while efficient and economical in design, could be vulnerable to damage caused by less careful use. For example, in the construction illustrated in the '467 patent, the plastic web was directly accessible to the exterior environment by any object capable of entering the open end of the socket wrench. Sharp objects doing so could scratch or cut the web in part. Occasionally, the workpiece being used with the wrench could have such surfaces or projections thereon which impact and damage the web, especially over an extended period of use. Similarly, sand, crystalline materials, and like debris could also contact the web through the open end of the socket wrench, if, for example, the wrench was dropped onto such materials. Excessive instances of that happening could eventually degrade the functional capabilities of the wrench. Further, users may on occasion use certain solvents on stuck bolts or work pieces prior to applying wrenches of the type taught by the '467 patent. Depending upon the chemical nature of the solvent and of the plastic material selected for web 36, there may be an adverse chemical reaction which degrades the web if that solvent is allowed to contact the web.
Moreover, while the specific plastic material suggested for web 36 in the '467 patent may be suitable for most applications, there are practical limits to the strength of plastic materials, given the cost of certain plastic compositions and the compressibility needed to be assembled into the wrench and flex upon workpiece insertion. A plastic web may not permit higher forces to be applied to the wrench in certain circumstances, without driving production costs too high for effective marketing.
In other situations the sheer mass of the plastic needed for the web can be an issue. When applying the invention of the '467 patent to rather small wrenches or tool holders, the extent of compression and/or tension available to the web because of the reduced size or mass of the web can significantly reduce the preferred degree of functionality. Similarly, the dimensional extent of notches 42 in arms 40 that are often required for the web to most effectively engage and retain arms 40 can, on occasion, significantly reduce the strength available for those arms.
Further, it has been found that over time and in certain instances, the utilization of a single web member for biasing the cam pins or arms, positioned where it is, can permit permanent deformation or “bending” of portions of the wrench components which degrades overall performance. In addition, as with any product, it is always desirable to find ways to assemble the product more efficiently and reduce production costs. Also, the specific structural format taught in the '467 patent, is not readily adaptable to as wide a range of tools as would be desired, particularly because of the web configuration and the formats available for retaining that configuration into applicable housings.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for workpiece manipulation. More specifically, objects of the present invention include providing a wrench system or workpiece holder which:
These and other objects of the present invention are obtained by the provision of an assembly of the spaced apart cam pins (or longitudinal arms) for the wrench which is radially biased and retained by metal spring elements formed in circumferential rings, spaced apart along the length of the arms, and acting upon adjacent arms. These spring rings are protected by intervening retention rings used to secure the assembly into the wrench housing. One or more of the spring rings can be secured to the end face of the arms, by a locking interface with notches in the end faces. A circumferential ring used intermediate the end faces of an arm can use a dimension reduction of the arm cross section in order to secure the arm. Alternatively, using spring rings at each end of the arms, with a shielding retention ring adjacent each spring ring, permits the camming functionality of the assembly to be readily utilized in more conventional wrenches.
Other objects, advantages, and novel features of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the following drawings and detailed description of preferred embodiments of this invention.
The drawings are not intended to be to scale from one drawing to the next, some enlargement being used to facilitate understanding of the invention.
For example, comparing the spring rings shown with respect to the two wrench types, concave springs are shown with
Accordingly, the detailed discussion herein should not be considered to be an enumeration of the only embodiments applicable or contemplated for the present invention.
Briefly,
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Spring rings 40 and 50 serve as narrowly dimensioned biasing elements at different positions along arms 22, in contrast to the use of a single biasing element of greater width in the '467 patent. Spring rings are, preferably, spaced apart along arms 22 and held in that relation by spacer means or ring 60. Spring rings are, for example, formed from metal material, such as steel, and is preferably resistant to deformation and loss of spring temper over a significantly wide temperature range. Ring 60 may be formed of any desired material sufficient to withstand the limited compressive forces exerted upon it and the environmental forces it faces during operation of the socket wrench. Often, however, it will be most convenient to form spacer rings 60 from steel or a similar metal. If only a single spring ring is used with housing 10 in a given application, the function of spacer 60 can be provided by a step or ledge in inner wall 28 toward opening 20.
In the embodiment of
Elements of the embodiment of
In still other alternative embodiments, the connection between the spring rings and the arms can be made via other mechanical connections, as is convenient in a given manufacturing operation or usage application, without departing from the primary functional characteristics of the present invention. In terms of the spring rings of the present invention, it is preferable in given applications that they apply radial biasing force to the arms via circumferentially continuous rings, although in a given application it may be advantageous to apply the spring biasing force via discrete and discontinuous elements, provided that the orientation of the arms is not adversely affected with respect to the camming function of applying force to the workpiece upon rotation of the wrench or tool.
As will now be understood by those of skill in the art, the spring rings of the present invention substitute spring force for compression/tension forces in radial biasing of longitudinal arms 22, by comparison with the invention described in the '467 patent. Those spring forces are directed to and between each pair of circumferentially adjacent arms, and may permit, in a given instance, greater differential in the radial biasing forces applied to given arms 22, according to uneven configurations of the workpiece circumference entering the tool housing. Moreover, the use of a pair of spring rings as the radial biasing means permits the security of system redundancy in the event of a partial failure or failure of a single spring ring.
Although the present invention has been described herein with respect to specific embodiments, it must be understood that was done by way of illustration and example. The spirit and scope of the present invention is intended to be limited only by the scope of the following claims.