The present invention relates to the field prosthetic limbs. More specifically, the present invention is a wrist device which allows a prosthetic limb to be manipulated relative to the wearer of the limb.
Wrist devices for the manipulation of prosthetic limbs are known. In such devices, a prosthetic limb such as a prosthetic hand or digit is fixed to a support member which is pivobuttonly coupled to a base member. The base member is attached to a socket located on the wearer's residual limb or stump. The support member and hand can pivot relative to the base member in order to move the hand/digit into different positions.
An example of one such device is disclosed in US2007/0260328, in which a prosthetic hand and support member can pivot in a flexion/extension plane relative to a base member. A gear segment attached to the support member has a number of indentations which are engaged by resilient retention elements which hold the support member and hand in certain positions relative to the base member. The wearer pulls or pushes the prosthetic hand in the flexion/extension plane in order to move the hand to a new position. As this takes place the retention elements are forced out of their current indentations in the gear segment and will enter the adjacent indentations as the gear segment rotates. In addition to the retention elements a sliding locking device can be slid in and out of engagement with slots in the gear segment in order to lock the hand in a particular position. The locking device is biased into a locked position by a spring.
A similar arrangement is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,144,430, which also discloses an arrangement in which the hand and support member can be manipulated in both the flexion/extension and adduction/abduction directions about a form of universal joint. Torsion springs are provided which bias the hand into a neutral position. One or more spring-loaded locking pins engage the hand to lock it into positions along one or both of the flexion/extension and adduction/abduction axes.
In arrangements such as those referred to above, the prosthesis wearer can find it difficult to overcome the biasing forces of the resilient members or springs which hold the hand in position or force the hand towards a given position. Consequently, repeated movements of the hand about the wrist device can lead to fatigue in the wearer. In addition, the biased locking arrangements which lock the hand in a given position can be cumbersome and awkward for a wearer to actuate with their remaining natural hand, and even more so if they have another hand prosthesis.
It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate one or more of these disadvantages.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided wrist device for a prosthetic limb, the device comprising:
The device may comprise first and second biasing members, with each of the first and second biasing members extending between the base member and the rack and biasing the rack and support member into the neutral position from substantially opposite directions.
The first and second biasing members may comprise first and second compression springs located between the rack and the base member, wherein the first spring biases the rack in a first direction and the second spring biases the rack in a substantially opposite second direction.
The compression springs may be partially housed within the rack, wherein a first end of each spring is engaged with an internal surface of the rack and a second end of each spring is engaged with the base member.
The base member may be provided with first and second adjustment members which can adjust the biasing force of the first and second springs, respectively.
The device may further comprise a locking mechanism for selectively preventing movement of the support member relative to the base member, the locking mechanism comprising an actuator which is moveable between locked and unlocked positions, the actuator including a first locking element which prevents movement of the pinion when the actuator is in the locked position.
The actuator may comprise an actuator shaft extending through the pinion along the pivot axis, and first and second actuator buttons at opposite ends of the shaft, wherein the actuator can move axially along the pivot axis relative to the base member and pinion when the first or second button is pressed, one of the first and second buttons incorporating the first locking element.
The device may further comprise a pinion shaft which is rotatably supported on the base member and rotatably coupled to the pinion, wherein the pinion shaft has a second locking element at one end thereof, the first and second locking elements engaging to prevent rotation of the pinion when the actuator is in the locked position.
The button which incorporates the first locking element may have a bottom surface which engages an upper surface of the base member when the actuator is in the locked position, thereby preventing relative rotation between the actuator and the base member.
At least one of the base member and actuator may include one or more magnets, the or each magnet attracting the actuator towards the locked or unlocked position when the actuator is within a predetermined distance of the base member.
The base member and first and second actuator buttons may include magnets such that each button is attracted to the base member when it comes within a predetermined distance of the base member.
The locking mechanism may further comprise a cover member having an opening through which the support member extends, the cover member enclosing the locking mechanism and engaging the first and second actuator buttons such that axial movement of the cover member will result in a corresponding movement of the actuator.
The device may further comprise at least one flexible covering located between the pinion and the opening in the cover member so as to prevent ingress of contaminants into the device.
The base member may include a quick release coupling for connecting the device to the wearer.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a prosthetic limb comprising a wrist device according to the first aspect of the invention.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following drawings:
A support member, or plate, 13 is pivotably connected to the base 3 so that the plate 13 may pivot about a pivot axis A relative to the base 3. The plate 13 is provided with a number of apertures 15 which allow the prosthetic limb to be attached to the plate 13. Pivoting about the pivot axis A permits the plate 13 to move in directions which replicate flexion and extension movements of a natural wrist relative to the forearm. These respective movements are illustrated by arrowheads F and E in
The device 1 further comprises a locking mechanism which the wearer can actuate in order to selectively lock the plate 13 in a particular position relative to the base 3. The only component of the locking mechanism which is visible in
The components which permit the pivoting of the support plate, and also the components which make up the aforementioned locking mechanism, can be viewed in
Each lug 20,21 is provided with a pair of openings 31 which extend through the lug 21 below its respective aperture 23. Alternatively, each lug 20,21 may be provided with a pair of recesses which open on the outer faces of the lugs 20,21. In other words the recesses open on the faces of the lugs 20,21 which face away from one another. A mount magnet 33 is fixed into each opening 31 or recess using glue or a similar bonding agent, so that the mount magnets 33 are exposed at least on the outer faces of the lugs 20,21.
A rack 35 is located on the base 3 within a central opening 28 in the mount 19. Both the rack 35 and opening 28 are generally square or rectangular in shape, but the opening 28 is wider than the rack 35 in a direction substantially transverse to the pivot axis A so that the rack 35 may slide transversely within the opening 28 along an axis which is substantially perpendicular to the pivot axis A. The rack 35 includes a pair of hemi-cylindrical recesses 37 which extend in the transverse direction relative to axis A. Each end of the rack 35 is provided with a plurality of upwardly extending teeth 39 which run along the ends of the rack in the transverse direction.
A biasing means in the form of a compression spring 41 is located in each of the hemi-cylindrical recesses 37 in the rack 35. Each recess 37 is open on one side of the rack 35 and is closed on the opposing side of the rack 35, with the two recesses 37 open on opposing sides of the rack 35. As a result, one end of each spring 41 lies against an internal surface of the rack 35 defined by the closed end of its respective recess 37 and, when the rack 35 is located in the opening 28, the other end of each spring 41 lies against a surface of the mount 19 adjacent the opening 28. Stop washers 43 are placed in the opposing ends of each spring 41 to assist with the engagement of the springs 41 with their respective surfaces. With this arrangement, the springs 41 hold the rack 35 in equilibrium within the opening 28 in the mount 19, with the biasing forces created by the springs 41 pushing in substantially opposite directions and being substantially equal and balanced. Fine tuning of the biasing forces and balance of the rack 35 can be undertaken by way of first and second adjustment screws 45 which extend through either side of the mount 19 and engage an end of their respective first and second springs 41.
During assembly of the device, the pinion 47 is placed between the first and second mount lugs 20,21 and a pinion shaft 57 is extended through the lug apertures 23 and pinion bore 55. Bearings 59 are located on the shaft 57 between each end of the pinion 47 and its respective lug 20,21. A pair of grub screws 61 connect the pinion 47 to the pinion shaft 57 via apertures in both components so that they rotate as one element.
The pinion shaft 57 is hollow and includes a locking element in the form of a toothed wheel 58 attached to one end thereof such that when the shaft 57 is in position the toothed wheel 58 is located outside the second mount lug 21. A first actuator button 63 is provided which has an actuator shaft 65 attached to it. During assembly, the first button 63 and the actuator shaft 65 are brought in from outside the first mounting lug 20 and the shaft 65 is fed through the aperture 23 in the first lug 20, the pinion shaft 57 and the aperture 23 in the second lug 21 so that the free end of the actuator shaft 65 projects from the toothed wheel 58 end of the pinion shaft 57. A second actuator button 67 is then connected to the free end of the actuator shaft 65. As a result, the first and second actuator buttons 63,67 and the actuator shaft 65 running between them can now slide as an actuator axially along the pivot axis A relative to the pinion 47, pinion shaft 57 and mount 19. Both the first and second actuator buttons 63,67 have flat bottom surfaces 64,66 which engage with an upper surface 68 of the mount 19 whenever one of the buttons 63,67 is pushed inwards towards the mount 19, thereby preventing rotation of the buttons 63,67 and actuator shaft 65 relative to the mount 19.
Axial movement of the actuator arrangement is limited by the buttons 63,67 coming into contact with the outer faces of the first and second mount lugs 20,21. Although not visible in
Button magnets 69 are located in recesses or openings in the buttons 63,67 so that the magnets 69 are partially exposed on at least the inner surfaces of each button 63,67. In other words, the magnets 69 are partially exposed on the surfaces of the buttons 63,67 which will come into contact with the mount lugs 20,21. The magnets 69 in the first and second buttons 63,67 and the mount magnets 33 fixed in the mount lugs 20,21 attract one another so as to assist in sliding the buttons 63,67 towards and away from the locking position.
Once assembly has been completed of the aforementioned components, the cover member 17 can be placed over the sliding lock mechanism in order to make it as easy as possible for a wearer to operate the lock. The underside of the cover member 17 is provided with a pair of slots 18, one of which is visible through an opening 16 in the cover 17 in
With the cover 17 attached to the locking mechanism the device 1 will appear as shown in
To operate the device, the wearer can lock or unlock the device either by manipulating the cover 17 with their other hand, or else by gently knocking one end of the cover against a surface. The magnets 33, 69 in the mount lugs 20,21 and actuator buttons 63,67 assist in moving the device between the locked and unlocked positions as they draw the actuator buttons 63,67 towards their respective lugs 20,21 when they come within a certain distance of the lugs 20,21. The magnets also provide a sufficient attraction force that the cover cannot be moved out of its present position without a reasonable force being applied to the cover. This is especially beneficial when the device is locked in a given position, so that the chances of the device being accidentally unlocked are reduced.
When in the unlocked position, the pinion 47 and support plate 13 are free to rotate about the pivot axis A relative to the base 3. At the same time, the springs 41 provide a damping force such that any forces applied to a hand attached to the plate 13 such as, for example, caused by the hand accidentally knocking against a surface, are not transmitted through the device to the socket and residual limb of the wearer. Furthermore, the springs 41 provide balanced biasing forces either side of the rack 35 which will return the plate 13 and limb attached thereto to a neutral position when the device is unlocked and no forces are being applied to the hand. The neutral position is a rest or zero position assumed by the rack 35 and plate 13 when no external forces other than those of the biasing springs 41 are being applied.
When the wearer wishes to place their prosthetic hand in a given position in the flexion/extension plane, they first manipulate the hand into the desired position using their other hand or by pressing the hand against a surface in order to overcome the biasing forces of the springs 41. Then, whilst maintaining the desired position of the hand, they then move the cover 17 towards the locked position. As described above, moving the cover 17 to the locked position brings the recess in the second actuator button 67 into contact with the toothed wheel 58 on the end of the pinion shaft 57 and also brings the bottom surface 66 of the button 67 into contact with the upper surface 68 of the mount. Thus, the button 67 cannot itself rotate and also holds the pinion shaft against rotation at the same time. One or more of the shims 27 can be placed upon the upper surface 68 of the mount in order to eradicate play or backlash between the teeth of the toothed wheel 58 and corresponding toothed recess in the second actuator button 67.
The wrist device of the present invention provides a damping arrangement in which the support plate and limb attached thereto biased towards a rest or neutral position. As the biasing forces applied are balanced the wearer does not need to apply a large force to the limb in order to overcome those biasing forces. The wearer will therefore not experience as much fatigue using this device as is caused by repeated movements of the prior art devices such as those described in the introduction to this specification. Furthermore, partially locating the biasing means within the rack allows the device to be more compact than known wrist arrangements.
The locking mechanism of the present invention provides a linear actuator which can be shuttled between locked and unlocked positions simply by the wearer pressing on a given end of the actuator, or indeed by pressing one end of the actuator against a surface. No biasing forces need to be overcome by the wearer in order to unlock the device, again limiting the fatigue which a wearer will encounter from repeatedly moving and locking the device in different positions. When present, magnets placed in at least one of the base member and actuator ensure that the actuator cannot be moved from the locked position without a predetermined force being applied to the actuator, but also assist the wearer in sliding the actuator into the desired position.
Although the preferred embodiment of the device incorporates a pair of biasing members, the balanced biasing force applied to the rack may alternatively be provided by way of a single biasing member (e.g. a coil spring) connected between the base and rack and arranged so movement of the rack in either direction perpendicular to the pivot axis will be resisted by the biasing member. Furthermore, whilst springs such as compression springs are the preferred biasing members, alternative biasing members such as resilient elastomer rods, for example, may be used instead.
Whilst the biasing members are preferably partially located in the rack for compactness of the device, they may be placed outside the rack and apply their forces in opposing directions to outer surfaces of the rack.
The locking mechanism may comprise an actuator with a single button for sliding the actuator into a locking position. Such an actuator may have a single locking element which engages the pinion to prevent rotational motion thereof. The pinion need not have a pinion shaft, but instead may be rotatably supported by bearings directly on the actuator shaft.
Whilst magnets are preferably provided on each of the base member and actuator, the device may only have one or more magnets on one of the base member and actuator.
The device may be provided without a cover member, wherein operation of the actuator would be achieved by directly pressing the actuator buttons on either end of the actuator.
The base member may be provided with an alternative arrangement for connecting the base to the wearer. For example, the base may be provided with a bayonet fitting which would engage with a corresponding fitment on a socket worn by the user.
Whilst the preferred embodiment of the present invention describes the use of the device with a prosthetic hand, it should be understood that the invention may also be used with other prosthetic limbs. For example, the device may support a limb comprised simply of one or more digits on a support chassis rather than a complete hand.
These and other modifications and improvements may be incorporated without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
760102 | Carnes | May 1904 | A |
1253823 | Hobbs | Jan 1918 | A |
1507682 | Pecorella et al. | Sep 1924 | A |
1507683 | Pecorella et al. | Sep 1924 | A |
2445711 | Fitch | Jul 1948 | A |
2477463 | Otterman | Jul 1949 | A |
2482555 | Otterman | Sep 1949 | A |
2508156 | Gillman | May 1950 | A |
2516791 | Motis | Jul 1950 | A |
2549716 | Simpson | Apr 1951 | A |
2586293 | Birkigt | Feb 1952 | A |
2592842 | Alderson | Apr 1952 | A |
2669727 | Opuszenski | Feb 1954 | A |
2983162 | Musser | May 1961 | A |
3406584 | Roantree | Oct 1968 | A |
3509583 | Fraioli | May 1970 | A |
3582857 | Kishel | Jun 1971 | A |
3641832 | Shigeta et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3683423 | Crapanzano | Aug 1972 | A |
3751995 | Carlson | Aug 1973 | A |
3837010 | Prout | Sep 1974 | A |
3866246 | Seamone et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3883900 | Jerard et al. | May 1975 | A |
3922930 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4030141 | Graupe | Jun 1977 | A |
4044274 | Ohm | Aug 1977 | A |
4094016 | Eroyan | Jun 1978 | A |
4114464 | Schubert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4197592 | Klein | Apr 1980 | A |
4398110 | Flinchbaugh et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4558704 | Petrofsky | Dec 1985 | A |
4577127 | Ferree et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4623354 | Childress et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4678952 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4808187 | Patterson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4813303 | Beezer et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822238 | Kwech | Apr 1989 | A |
4955918 | Lee | Sep 1990 | A |
4960425 | Yan et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4990162 | LeBlanc et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5020162 | Kersten et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5062673 | Mimura | Nov 1991 | A |
5088125 | Ansell et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5133775 | Chen | Jul 1992 | A |
5246463 | Giampapa | Sep 1993 | A |
5252102 | Singer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255188 | Telepko | Oct 1993 | A |
5387245 | Fay et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413454 | Movsesian | May 1995 | A |
5413611 | Haslam, II et al. | May 1995 | A |
5498472 | Gold | Mar 1996 | A |
5501498 | Ulrich | Mar 1996 | A |
5581166 | Elsmann et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605071 | Buchanan, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
5785960 | Rigg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5851194 | Fratrick | Dec 1998 | A |
5852675 | Matsuo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888213 | Sears et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888246 | Gow | Mar 1999 | A |
5900714 | Dubhashi et al. | May 1999 | A |
6111973 | Holt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6175962 | Michelson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6223615 | Huck | May 2001 | B1 |
6244873 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6344062 | Abboudi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361570 | Gow | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6591707 | Torii et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6660043 | Kajitani et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6786112 | Ruttor | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7144430 | Archer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7243569 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7316304 | Heravi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7316795 | Knauss | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7370896 | Anderson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7640680 | Castro | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7823475 | Hirabayashi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7867287 | Puchhammer | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7922773 | Kuiken | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8016893 | Weinberg et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8100986 | Puchhammer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8197554 | Whiteley et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257446 | Puchhammer | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8337568 | Macduff | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8491666 | Schulz | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8579991 | Puchhammer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593255 | Pang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8657887 | Gill | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8662552 | Torres-Jara | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8663339 | Inschlag et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690963 | Puchhammer | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696763 | Gill | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8739315 | Baacke | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8803844 | Green et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8808397 | Gow | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8828096 | Gill | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8986395 | McLeary | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995760 | Gill | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9278012 | Gill | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9333096 | Perez de Alderete et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9387095 | McLeary et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9402749 | Gill et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9435400 | Cheung et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9463100 | Gill | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9707103 | Thompson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720515 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9839534 | Lipsey et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9999522 | Gill | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10047908 | Bohle, II et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10265197 | Gill et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10318863 | Lock et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10369016 | Lipsey et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10369024 | Gill | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10398576 | Gill et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10449063 | Gill | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10610385 | Meljer et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
11185426 | Gill et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11357646 | Gill | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20010023058 | Jung et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020016631 | Marchitto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020135241 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030036805 | Senior | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040002672 | Carlson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054423 | Martin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078091 | Elkins | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078299 | Down-Logan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103740 | Townsend et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040181289 | Bedard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182125 | McLean | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050021154 | Brimalm | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021155 | Brimalm | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050093997 | Dalton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101693 | Arbogast et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050192677 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060029909 | Kaczkowski | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054782 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060158146 | Tadano | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167564 | Flaherty et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212129 | Lake et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229755 | Kuiken et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251408 | Konno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032884 | Veatch | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058860 | Harville et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061111 | Jung et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071314 | Bhatti et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070102228 | Shiina et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137351 | Schwendemann | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173955 | Archer | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175681 | King et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230832 | Usui et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260328 | Bertels | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276303 | Jenner, Jr. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080058668 | Seyed Momen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097269 | Weinberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146981 | Greenwald et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080215162 | Farnsworth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260218 | Smith et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262634 | Puchhammer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090213379 | Carroll et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100016990 | Kurtz | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100116078 | Kim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100274365 | Evans et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110048098 | Rollins et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110136376 | Johnson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203027 | Flather et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110237381 | Puchhammer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257765 | Evans et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264238 | van der Merwe et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265597 | Long | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110278061 | Farnan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004884 | Fillol et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014571 | Wong et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120061155 | Berger et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120099788 | Bhatti et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109337 | Schulz | May 2012 | A1 |
20120204665 | Baudasse | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120280812 | Sheikman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286629 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303136 | Macduff | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330439 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130041476 | Schulz | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053984 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130059467 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076699 | Spencer | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130144197 | Ingimundarson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130175816 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130253705 | Goldfarb et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268090 | Goldfarb et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268094 | Van Wiemeersch | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310949 | Goldfarb et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140236314 | Van Wiemeersch | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251056 | Preuss | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324189 | Gill et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140371871 | Farina et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150142082 | Simon et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150183069 | Lee | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216681 | Lipsey et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230941 | Jury | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150351935 | Donati et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150360369 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374515 | Meijer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160250044 | Iversen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287422 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170007424 | Gill | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049586 | Gill et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180064563 | Gill | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180071115 | Lipsey et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180168830 | Evans et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180296368 | Gill | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190091040 | Gill | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190183661 | Gill | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190209345 | LaChappelle | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190216618 | Gill | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190375067 | Berrocal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190380846 | Lipsey et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200054466 | Gill et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200197193 | Byrne et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20220151805 | Gill et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1803413 | Jul 2006 | CN |
106994694 | Aug 2017 | CN |
309 367 | Nov 1918 | DE |
24 34 834 | Feb 1976 | DE |
198 54 762 | Jun 2000 | DE |
101 05 814 | Sep 2002 | DE |
203 15 575 | Jan 2004 | DE |
698 16 848 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10 2012 009 699 | Nov 2013 | DE |
0 145 504 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 219 478 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 256 643 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0 484 173 | May 1992 | EP |
0 947 899 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0 968 695 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 043 003 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 617 103 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 557 547 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2 532 927 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2 612 619 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2 653 137 | Oct 2013 | EP |
326 970 | Mar 1930 | GB |
607 001 | Feb 1947 | GB |
1 386 942 | Mar 1975 | GB |
1 510 298 | May 1978 | GB |
1 585 256 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2 067 074 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 146 406 | Apr 1985 | GB |
2 278 281 | Nov 1994 | GB |
2 357 725 | Jul 2001 | GB |
D 3023680 | Apr 2006 | GB |
2 444 679 | Jun 2008 | GB |
53-011456 | Feb 1978 | JP |
53-094693 | Aug 1978 | JP |
07-174631 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2001-082913 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-299448 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-131135 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-310242 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-134526 | May 2003 | JP |
2004-073802 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-224280 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2018-167375 | Nov 2018 | JP |
WO 95024875 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 96023643 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 99021517 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 00025840 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 00069375 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 01004838 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 02049534 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03017877 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03017878 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03017880 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2006058190 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006069264 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006078432 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006086504 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006092604 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006110790 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007063266 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076764 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076765 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007126854 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007127973 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008044052 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008044207 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008092695 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098059 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098072 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009011682 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2010018358 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010051798 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010149967 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011001136 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011022569 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011036473 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011036626 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011088964 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011107778 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011143004 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2014027897 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2015120076 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2015120083 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2016051138 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO 2017061879 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO 2018180782 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO 2021177840 | Sep 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Michelangelo New Prosthetic Hand by Ottobock, Youtube. (Year: 2010). |
9 Worm Gear Pair, KHK Technical Information, Oct. 21, 2008, pp. 291-299. |
Albu-Schaffer et al., “Soft Robotics”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Sep. 2008, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 20-30. |
AMA, Excerpts from American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (5th ed. 2000), pp. 432-453. |
Antonio et al., “A Virtual Upper Limb Prosthesis as a Training System”, 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE 2010) Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México. Sep. 8-10, 2010, pp. 210-215. |
Bellman et al., “SPARKy 3: Design of an Active Robotic Ankle Prosthesis with Two Actuated Degrees of Freedom Using Regenerative Kinetics”, in Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Oct. 19-22, 2008, Scottsdale, AZ, pp. 511-516. |
Belter et al., “Mechanical Design and Performance Specifications of Anthropomorphic Prosthetic Hands: A Review”, JRRD, Nov. 5, 2013, vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 599-617. |
Biddiss et al., “Consumer Design Priorities for Upper Limb Prosthetics”, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Nov. 2007, vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 346-357. |
Biddiss et al., “Upper Limb Prosthesis Use and Abandonment: A Survey of the Last 25 Years”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Sep. 2007, vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 236-257. |
Biddiss et al., “Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment”, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Dec. 2007, vol. 86, No. 12, pp. 977-987. |
Bretthauer et al., “A New Adaptive Hand Prosthesis”, Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie, Feb. 2008, pp. 40-45. |
Butterfaß et al., “DLR-Hand II: Next Generation of a Dextrous Robot Hand”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea, May 21-26, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 109-114. |
Chicoine et al., “Prosthesis-Guided Training of Pattern Recognition-Controlled Myoelectric Prosthesis”, in Proceedings of the 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Diego, CA, Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2012, pp. 1876-1879. |
Childress et al., “Control of Limb Prostheses”, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Mar. 2004, Chapter 12, pp. 173-195. |
Choi et al., “Design of High Power Permanent Magnet Motor with Segment Rectangular Copper Wire and Closed Slot Opening on Electric Vehicles”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Jun. 2010, vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 2070-2073. |
Cipriani et al., “On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User-Prosthesis Interaction”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Feb. 2008, vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 170-184. |
Connolly, “Prosthetic Hands from Touch Bionics”, Industrial Robot, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Jun. 2008, vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 290-293. |
Controzzi et al., “Miniaturized Non-Back-Drivable Mechanism for Robotic Applications”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Oct. 2010, vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 1395-1406. |
Damian et al., “Artificial Tactile Sensing of Position and Slip Speed by Exploiting Geometrical Features”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Feb. 2015, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 263-274. |
“DC Circuit Theory”, <https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/dcp_1.html>, Date verified by the Wayback Machine Apr. 23, 2013, pp. 16. |
Dechev et al., “Multiple Finger, Passive Adaptive Grasp Prosthetic Hand”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Oct. 1, 2001, vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 1157-1173. |
Dellorto, Danielle, “Bionic Hands Controlled by iPhone App”, CNN, Apr. 12, 2013, pp. 4 <http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/12/health/bionic-hands>. |
“DuPont Engineering Design—The Review of DuPont Engineering Polymers in Action”; <http://www.engpolymer.co.kr/x_data/magazine/engdesign07_2e.pdf>, Feb. 2007, pp. 16. |
Edsinger-Gonzales, Aaron, “Design of a Compliant and Force Sensing Hand for a Humanoid Robot”, 2005, pp. 5. |
Engeberg et al., “Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Prosthetic Hands to Simultaneously Prevent Slip and Minimize Deformation of Grasped Objects,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Feb. 2013, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 376-385. |
Fildes, Jonathan, “Bionic Hand Wins Top Tech Prize”, BBC News, Jun. 9, 2008, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7443866.stm, pp. 3. |
Fougner et al., “Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems Rehabilitation Engineering, Sep. 2012, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 663-677. |
Fukuda et al., “Training of Grasping Motion Using a Virtual Prosthetic Control System”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Oct. 10-13, 2010, pp. 1793-1798. |
Gaine et al., “Upper Limb Traumatic Amputees. Review of Prosthetic Use”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, Feb. 1997, vol. 22B, No. 1, pp. 73-76. |
Grip Chips™, Datasheet, May 15, 2014, Issue 1, <http://touchbionics.com/sites/default/files/files/Grip%20Chip%20datasheet%20May%202014.pdf>, pp. 1. |
Heckathorne, Craig W., “Components for Electric-Powered Systems”, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Mar. 2004, Chapter 11, pp. 145-171. |
Hojjat et al., “A Comprehensive Study on Capabilities and Limitations of Roller-Screw with Emphasis on Slip Tendency”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Oct. 2009, vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1887-1899. |
Hsieh, Chiu-Fan., “Dynamics Analysis of Cycloidal Speed Reducers with Pinwheel and Nonpinwheel Designs”, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Sep. 2014, vol. 136, No. 9, pp. 091008-1-091008-11. |
“ILimb Bionic Hand Now Ready for Market”, Technovelgy.com, www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=1125, as printed Jul. 6, 2020 in 3 pages. |
Jebsen et al., “An Objective and Standardized Test of Hand Function”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jun. 1969, vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 311-319. |
Johannes et al., “An Overview of the Developmental Process for the Modular Prosthetic Limb,” John Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 2011, vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 207-216. |
Kargov et al., “Applications of a Fluidic Artificial Hand in the Field of Rehabilitation”, Rehabilitation Robotics, Ch. 15, Aug. 2007, pp. 261-286. |
Kargov et al., “Development of a Multifunctional Cosmetic Prosthetic Hand”, Proceedings for the 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Jun. 12-15, 2007, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 550-553. |
Kawasaki et al., “Design and Control of Five-Fingered Haptic Interface Opposite to Human Hand”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Oct. 2007, vol. 23, No. 5., pp. 909-918. |
Kent et al., “Electromyogram Synergy Control of a Dexterous Artificial Hand to Unscrew and Screw Objects”, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, Mar. 2014, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-20. |
Kermani et al., “Friction Identification and Compensation in Robotic Manipulators”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Dec. 2007, vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 2346-2353. |
Kuiken et al., “Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-Time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms”, JAMA, Feb. 11, 2009, vol. 301, No. 6, pp. 619-628. |
Kyberd et al., “Two-Degree-of-Freedom Powered Prosthetic Wrist”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, Jul. 2011, vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 609-617. |
Lamounier et al., “On the Use of Virtual and Augmented Reality for Upper Limb Prostheses Training and Simulation”, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2010, pp. 2451-2454. |
Light et al., “Establishing a Standardized Clinical Assessment Tool of Pathologic and Prosthetic Hand Function: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jun. 2002, vol. 83, pp. 776-783. |
Mace et al., “Augmenting Neuroprosthetic Hand Control Through Evaluation of a Bioacoustic Interface”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3-7, 2013, pp. 7. |
Majd et al., “A Continuous Friction Model for Servo Systems with Stiction”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Sep. 28-29, 1995, pp. 296-301. |
Martinez-Villalpando et al., “Agonist-Antagonist Active Knee Prosthesis: A Preliminary Study in Level-Ground Walking”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 46, No. 3, 2009, pp. 361-374. |
Maxon Precision Motors, Inc., “Maxon Flat Motor: EX 10 flat 10 mm, brushless, 0.25 Watt”, Specification, May 2011, p. 181. |
Maxon Precision Motors, Inc., “Maxon EC Motor: EC10 10 mm, brushless, 8 Watt”, Specification, May 2011, p. 140. |
MEC '05: Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine, University of New Brunswick's MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium, Aug. 17-19, 2005, Fredericton NB Canada, p. 260. |
Miller et al., “Summary and Recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures”, Journal of Prosthetics Orthotics, Oct. 2009, vol. 21, pp. 83-89. |
Montagnani et al., “Is it Finger or Wrist Dexterity that is Missing in Current Hand Prostheses?”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Jul. 2015, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 600-609. |
Morita et al., “Development of 4-D.O.F. Manipulator Using Mechanical Impedance Adjuster”, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, Apr. 1996, pp. 2902-2907. |
“Motor Technology—Girard Gearboxes Low Backlash Principle Explained”, Motor Technology, https://www.motec.co.uk/tip-gearbox_principle.htm as printed May 23, 2012 in 3 pages. |
Ninu et al., “Closed-Loop Control of Grasping with a Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis: Which are the Relevant Feedback Variable for Force Control?” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Sep. 2014, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 1041-1052. |
Osborn et al., “Utilizing Tactile Feedback for Biomimetic Grasping Control in Upper Limb Prostheses”, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, Nov. 5, 2013, pp. 4. |
Pedrocchi et al., “MUNDUS Project: Multimodal Neuroprosthesis for Daily Upper Limb Support”, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, Jul. 2013, vol. 10, No. 66, pp. 20. |
Pinzur et al., “Functional Outcome Following Traumatic Upper Limb Amputation and Prosthetic Limb Fitting”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, Sep. 1994. vol. 19, pp. 836-839. |
Poppe, Zytel HTN Provides a Helping Hand, DuPont Engineering Design 8 (2007), pp. 3. |
Press Release, “Touch Bionics Introduce Digitally Controlled Supro Wrist”, <http://www.touchbionics.com/news-events/news/touch-bionics-introduce-digitally-controlled-supro-wrist>, May 3, 2016 in 2 pages. |
Puig et al., “A Methodology for the Design of Robotic Hands with Multiple Fingers”, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2008, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 177-184. |
Raspopovic et al., “Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses”, Science Translational Medicine, Feb. 5, 2014, vol. 6, No. 222, pp. 1-10. |
Resnik et al., “The DEKA Arm: Its Features, Functionality, and Evolution During the Veterans Affairs Study to Optimize the DEKA Arm”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Oct. 2013, vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 492-504. |
Scheme et al., “Electromyogram Pattern Recognition for Control of Powered Upper-Limb Prostheses: State of the Art and Challenges for Clinical Use”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development (JRRD), Jul. 2011, vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 643-659. |
Scheme et al., “Motion Normalized Proportional Control for Improved Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Jan. 2014, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 149-157. |
Schulz et al., “Die Entwicklung Einer Multifunktionalen Kosmetischen Handprothese”, Prothetik, Orthopädie-Technik, Aug. 2006, pp. 627-632. |
Sensinger et al., “Cycloid vs. Harmonic Drives for use in High Ratio, Single Stage Robotic Transmissions”, 2012 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, USA, May 14-18, 2012, pp. 4130-4135. |
Sensinger, “Efficiency of High-Sensitivity Gear Trains, such as Cycloid Drives”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Jul. 2013, vol. 135, No. 7, pp. 071006-1-071006-9. |
Sensinger et al., “Exterior vs. Interior Rotors in Robotic Brushless Motors”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9-13, 2011, pp. 2764-2770. |
Sensinger, “Selecting Motors for Robots Using Biomimetic Trajectories: Optimum Benchmarks, Windings, and other Considerations,” 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AL, USA, May 3-8, 2010, pp. 4175-4181. |
Sensinger, “Unified Approach to Cycloid Drive Profile, Stress, and Efficiency Optimization”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Feb. 2010, vol. 132, pp. 024503-1-024503-5. |
Sensinger et al., “User-Modulated Impedance Control of a Prosthetic Elbow in Unconstrained, Perturbed Motion”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Mar. 2008, vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 1043-1055. |
Stix, Gary, “Phantom Touch: Imbuing a Prosthesis with Manual Dexterity”, Scientific American, Oct. 1998, pp. 41 & 44. |
“Supro Wrist”, Touch Bionics, <https://web.archive.org/web/20160928141440/http://www.touchbionics.com/products/supro-wrist> as archived Sep. 28, 2016 in 3 pages. |
Sutton et al., “Towards a Universal Coupler Design for Modern Powered Prostheses”, MEC 11 Raising the Standard, Proceedings of the 2011 MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium Frederiction, New Brunswick, Canada, Aug. 14-19, 2011, pp. 5. |
Tan et al., “A Neural Interface Provides Long-Term Stable Natural Touch Perception”, Science Translational Medicine, Oct. 8, 2014, vol. 6, No. 257, pp. 1-11. |
Tang, “General Concepts of Wrist Biomechanics and a View from Other Species”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, European Volume, Aug. 2008, vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 519-525. |
The Weir Thesis (“Weir Thesis”) is entitled “An Externally-Powered, Myo-Electrically Controlled Synergetic Prosthetic Hand for the Partial-Hand Amputee”, published Aug. 1989, pp. 365. [Uploaded in 3 Parts]. |
Toledo et al., “A Comparison of Direct and Pattern Recognition Control for a Two Degree-of-Freedom Above Elbow Virtual Prosthesis”, in Proceedings 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Aug. 2012, pp. 4332-4335. |
“Touch Bionics Grip Chips Let Hand Prostheses Think for Themselves”, May 15, 2014, <www.medgadget.com/2014/05/touch-bionics-grip-chips-let-hand-prostheses-think-for-themselves.html>, pp. 2. |
Touch Bionics PowerPoint Presentation in 3 pages, believed to be shown at ISPO Conference in Leipzig, Germany, May 2016. (Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art as of the date indicated, but Applicant does not admit its status as prior art by submitting it here and reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date). |
Touch Bionics PowerPoint Slide in 1 page, believed to be presented at Advanced Arm Dynamics company Jan. 11, 2016. (Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art as of the date indicated, but Applicant does not admit its status as prior art by submitting it here and reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date). |
Touch Bionics Screenshots of video in PowerPoint Presentation in 4 pages, believed to be shown at ISPO Conference in Leipzig, Germany, May 2016. (Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art as of the date indicated, but Applicant does not admit its status as prior art by submitting it here and reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date). |
Trachtenberg et al., “Radio Frequency Identification, An Innovative Solution to Guide Dexterous Prosthetic Hands”, 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Boston, MA, Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 2011, pp. 4. |
Vilarino, Martin, “A Novel Wireless Controller for Switching among Modes for an Upper-Limb Prosthesis”, The Academy Today, Jan. 2014, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. A-12 to A-15. |
Ward, Derek Kempton, “Design of a Two Degree of Freedom Robotic Finger”, Sep. 1996, in 155 pages. |
Weir et al., “Design of Artificial Arms and Hands for Prosthetic Applications”, Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook, Jul. 2009, vol. 2, pp. 537-598. |
Wettels et al., “Grip Control Using Biomimetic Tactile Sensing Systems”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Dec. 2009, vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 718-723. |
Whiteside et al., “Practice Analysis Task Force: Practice Analysis of the Disciplines of Orthotics and Prosthetics”, American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics, Inc., 2000, pp. 1-51. |
Wilson et al., “A Bus-Based Smart Myoelectric Electrode/Amplifier-System Requirements”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Oct. 2011, vol. 60, No. 10, pp. 3290-3299. |
“World's First Bionic Hand Factory Opened by Scottish Company”, DailyMail.com, Jan. 8, 2008, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-506661/Worlds-bionic-hand-factory-opened-Scottish-company.html, pp. 4. |
Zampagni et al., “A Protocol for Clinical Evaluation of the Carrying Angle of the Elbow by Anatomic Landmarks”, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Jan. 1, 2008, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 106-112. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/GB2015/052780, mailed Jan. 7, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/GB2015/052780, mailed Apr. 13, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220346978 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16423802 | May 2019 | US |
Child | 17664783 | US | |
Parent | 15508064 | US | |
Child | 16423802 | US |