The subject matter disclosed herein relates to X-ray tubes, and in particular, to X-ray cathode systems and methods of manufacturing X-ray cathodes.
X-ray tubes typically include an electron source, such as a cathode, that releases electrons at high acceleration. Some of the released electrons may impact a target anode. The collision of the electrons with the target anode produces X-rays, which may be used in a variety of medical devices such as computed tomography (CT) imaging systems, X-ray scanners, and so forth. In thermionic cathode systems, a filament is included that may be induced to release electrons through the thermionic effect, i.e. in response to being heated. However, the distance between the cathode and the anode must be kept short so as to allow for proper electron bombardment. Further, thermionic X-ray cathodes typically emit electrons throughout the entirety of the surface of the filament. Accordingly, it is very difficult to focus all electrons into a small focal spot.
In one embodiment, an X-ray cathode tube filament includes a substrate and a coating disposed on the substrate. A thermionic effect is used to emit an electron beam from the coating but not from the substrate.
In a second embodiment, an X-ray tube system is provided that includes a first cathode filament and a target anode. The first cathode filament includes a substrate and a coating disposed on the substrate. The target anode is positioned a cathode-target distance away from and facing the first cathode filament. A first stream of electrons is emitted from the first cathode filament coating through the thermionic effect and accelerated into a first focal spot on the target anode in order to produce X-rays.
In a third embodiment, a method of manufacturing an X-ray cathode system is provided. The method of manufacturing includes disposing a coating onto a substrate of a filament and placing the coated filament in a cathode assembly. The coating has a lower work function than the filament substrate.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
In certain X-ray cathode assemblies, one or more thermionic filaments may be employed to emit a stream of electrodes. A thermionic filament may be induced to release electrons from the filament's surface through the application of heat energy. Indeed, the hotter the filament material, the greater the number of electron that may be emitted. The filament material is typically chosen for its ability to generate electrons through the thermionic effect and for its ability withstand high heat, in some cases, upwards of approximately 2500° C. or higher. Traditionally, the filament material has been chosen to be tungsten or a tungsten derivative such as doped tungsten (i.e., tungsten with added impurities). Tungsten has a high melting point and a relatively low work function (i.e., a measure of the minimum energy required to induce an electron to leave a material). However, a traditional tungsten filament typically emits less electrons than coated filament embodiments as disclosed and discussed herein, at the same temperature. Accordingly, X-ray tubes employing the disclosed coated filaments embodiments may be capable of generating a higher X-ray output when compared to X-ray tubes employing traditional uncoated filaments at the same temperature.
With the foregoing in mind, it may be beneficial to discuss embodiments of imaging systems that may incorporate the coated filaments as described herein before discussing these disclosures in detail. With this in mind, and turning now to the figures,
The source 12 may be positioned proximate to a collimator 22. The collimator 22 may consist of one or more collimating regions, such as lead or tungsten shutters, for each emission point of the source 12. The collimator 22 typically defines the size and shape of the one or more X-ray beams 20 that pass into a region in which a subject 24 or object is positioned. Each X-ray beam 20 may be generally fan-shaped or cone-shaped, depending on the configuration of the detector array and/or the desired method of data acquisition. An attenuated portion 26 of each X-ray beam 20 passes through the subject or object, and impacts a detector array, represented generally at reference numeral 28.
The detector 28 is generally formed by a plurality of detector elements that detect the X-ray beams 20 after they pass through or around a subject or object placed in the field of view of the imaging system 10. Each detector element produces an electrical signal that represents the intensity of the X-ray beam incident at the position of the detector element when the beam strikes the detector 28. Electrical signals are acquired and processed to generate one or more scan datasets.
A system controller 30 commands operation of the imaging system 10 to execute examination and/or calibration protocols and to process the acquired data. The source 12 is typically controlled by a system controller 30. Generally, the system controller 30 furnishes power, focal spot location, control signals and so forth, for the X-ray examination sequences. The detector 28 is coupled to the system controller 30, which commands acquisition of the signals generated by the detector 28. The system controller 30 may also execute various signal processing and filtration functions, such as initial adjustment of dynamic ranges, interleaving of digital image data, and so forth. In the present context, system controller 30 may also include signal processing circuitry and associated memory circuitry. As discussed in greater detail below, the associated memory circuitry may store programs, routines, and/or encoded algorithms executed by the system controller 30, configuration parameters, image data, and so forth. In one embodiment, the system controller 30 may be implemented as all or part of a processor-based system such as a general purpose or application-specific computer system.
In the illustrated embodiment of
The linear positioning subsystem 32 may linearly displace a table or support on which the subject or object being imaged is positioned. Thus, the table or support may be linearly moved within the gantry or within an imaging volume (e.g., the volume located between the source 12 and the detector 28) and enable the acquisition of data from particular areas of the subject or object and, thus the generation of images associated with those particular areas. Additionally, the linear positioning subsystem 32 may displace one or more components of the collimator 22, so as to adjust the shape and/or direction of the X-ray beam 20. Further, in embodiments in which the source 12 and the detector 28 are configured to provide extended or sufficient coverage along the z-axis (i.e., the axis generally associated with the length of the patient table or support and/or with the lengthwise direction of the imaging bore) and/or in which the linear motion of the subject or object is not required, the linear positioning subsystem 32 may be absent.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the source 12 may be controlled by an X-ray controller 38 disposed within the system controller 30. The X-ray controller 38 may be configured to provide power and timing signals to the source 12. In addition, in some embodiments the X-ray controller 30 may be configured to selectively activate the source 12 such that tubes or emitters at different locations within the system 10 may be operated in synchrony with one another or independent of one another.
Further, the system controller 30 may comprise a data acquisition system (DAS) 40. In one embodiment, the detector 28 is coupled to the system controller 30, and more particularly to the data acquisition system 40. The data acquisition system 40 receives data collected by readout electronics of the detector 28. The data acquisition system 40 typically receives sampled analog signals from the detector 28 and converts the data to digital signals for subsequent processing by a processor-based system, such as a computer 42. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the detector 28 may convert the sampled analog signals to digital signals prior to transmission to the data acquisition system 40.
In the depicted embodiment, a computer 42 is coupled to the system controller 30. The data collected by the data acquisition system 40 may be transmitted to the computer 42 for subsequent processing. For example, the data collected from the detector 28 may undergo pre-processing and calibration at the data acquisition system 40 and/or the computer 42 to produce representations of the line integrals of the attenuation coefficients of the subject or object undergoing imaging. In one embodiment, the computer 42 contains data processing circuitry 44 for filtering and processing the data collected from the detector 28.
The computer 42 may include or communicate with a memory 46 that can store data processed by the computer 42, data to be processed by the computer 42, or routines and/or algorithms to be executed by the computer 42. It should be understood that any type of computer accessible memory device capable of storing the desired amount or type of data and/or code may be utilized by the imaging system 10. Moreover, the memory 46 may comprise one or more memory devices, such as magnetic, solid state, or optical devices, of similar or different types, which may be local and/or remote to the system 10.
The computer 42 may also be adapted to control features enabled by the system controller 30 (i.e., scanning operations and data acquisition). Furthermore, the computer 42 may be configured to receive commands and scanning parameters from an operator via an operator workstation 48 which may be equipped with a keyboard and/or other input devices. An operator may, thereby, control the system 10 via the operator workstation 48. Thus, the operator may observe from the computer 42 a reconstructed image and/or other data relevant to the system 10. Likewise, the operator may initiate imaging or calibration routines, select and apply image filters, and so forth, via the operator workstation 48.
As illustrated, the system 10 may also include a display 50 coupled to the operator workstation 48. Additionally, the system 10 may include a printer 52 coupled to the operator workstation 48 and configured to print such voltage measurement results. The display 50 and the printer 52 may also be connected to the computer 42 directly or via the operator workstation 48. Further, the operator workstation 48 may include or be coupled to a picture archiving and communications system (PACS) 54. It should be noted that PACS 54 might be coupled to a remote system 56, radiology department information system (RIS), hospital information system (HIS) or to an internal or external network, so that others at different locations can gain access to the image data.
With the foregoing general system description in mind and turning now to
The cathode assembly 14, i.e., electron source, is positioned a cathode-target distance d away from the anode 16 so that the electron beam 18 generated by the cathode assembly 14 is focused on a focal spot 72 on the anode 16. The space between the cathode assembly 14 and the anode 16 is typically evacuated in order to minimize electron collisions with other atoms and to maximize an electric potential. A strong electric potential, in some cases upwards of 20 kV, is typically created between the cathode 14 and the anode 16, causing electrons emitted by the cathode 14 through the thermionic effect to become strongly attracted to the anode 16. The resulting electron beam 18 is directed toward the anode 16. The resulting electron bombardment of the focal spot 72 will generate an X-ray beam 20 through the Bremsstrahlung effect, i.e., braking radiation.
The distance d is a factor in determining focal spot 72 characteristics such as length and width, and accordingly, the imaging capabilities of the generated X-ray beam 20. If the distance d is too great, an insufficient number of electrons will impinge the anode 16 and/or the electron beam 18 may spread out too much to generate a properly sized X-ray beam 20. The resulting X-ray images may contain blurs or other imaging artifacts. Traditionally, the distance d has been set to less than approximately 50 mm so as to define a small focal spot (e.g., approximately less than 0.25 mm2 or smaller), capable of generating a suitable X-ray beam 20. The embodiments disclosed herein and discussed in more detail with respect to the figures below allow for the distance d to be set at approximately a distance d of 50 mm or longer. Indeed, the disclosed embodiments allow for very small focal spot sizes at longer cathode-target distances, thus allow for the accommodation of other devices, such as electron collectors or beam handling magnets, inside of the X-ray tube assembly 58.
In certain embodiments, the extraction electrode 69 is included and is disposed between the cathode assembly 14 and the anode 16. In other embodiments, the extraction electrode 69 is not included. When included, the extraction electrode may be kept at the anode 16 potential, in some cases, upwards of 20 kV. The extraction electrode 69 includes an opening 71. The opening 71 allows for the passage of electrons through the extraction electrode 69. In the depicted embodiment, the extraction electrode is positioned at a cathode-electrode distance e away from the cathode assembly 14. The cathode-electrode distance e is also a factor in determining focal spot 72 characteristics such as length and width, and accordingly, the imaging capabilities of the generated X-ray beam 20. The electrons are accelerated over the distance e and drift without acceleration over the distance d-e. If the distance e is too great, an insufficient number of electrons will impinge the anode 16 and/or the electron beam 18 may spread out too much to generate a properly sized X-ray beam 20. The resulting X-ray images may contain blurs or other imaging artifacts. Traditionally, the distance e has been set to less than approximately 50 mm so as to define a small focal spot (e.g., approximately less than 0.25 mm2 or smaller), capable of generating a suitable X-ray beam 20. The embodiments disclosed herein and discussed in more detail with respect to the figures below allow for the distance e to be set at a distance e of approximately 15 mm to upwards of 50 mm.
Turning to
A coating 74 may be selected that has a lower work function than that of the substrate 76. That is, the coating 74 may require less thermal energy to release electrons than the thermal energy required of the substrate 76. Indeed, in filament embodiments where the coating has a work function of approximately 3.5 electron volts (eV), the emitted electron current density (i.e., a measure related to the number and density of electrons emitted per surface area of the filament) may improve by a factor of approximately one hundred when compared to a traditional uncoated tungsten filament at the same temperature. Accordingly, the coated filament 68 may produce significantly more electrons and a more powerful electron beam 18 when compared to the electron beam produced by a traditional filament at the same temperature. Indeed, a coating having a work function of less than approximately 4.5 eV may result in a filament 68 that produces a more powerful electron beam 18 when compared to the electron beam produced by a traditional filament at the same temperature. Additionally, the coating 74 may be selected to be resistant to certain gases that may be present in the X-ray tube assembly 58 as well as to back-bombardment of ions (e.g., rebounding electrons), resulting in a coating 74 that has a long operational life.
Further, the filament's 68 thermionic temperature (i.e., temperature at which electron emissions occur) may be regulated so that the coating 74 and not the substrate 76 may act as the primary emissive layer of the electron beam 18. A coating 74 having a lower work function will emit electrons at a lower temperature than a substrate having a higher work function. Accordingly, the temperature of the filament 68 may be set at a value, for example a value approximately 400° C. lower than the value set for a traditional filament. The coating 74 will emit electrons at the lower temperature value because of the coating's lower work function. Using lower operating temperatures may also be advantageous in prolonging the life of the coated filament 68. Filament 68 failure is traditionally driven by evaporation of the filament 68 material during thermionic operations. In high vacuum conditions, such as those found inside the X-ray tube assembly 58, material loss can be proportional to the vapor pressure of the evaporating material. Vapor pressure of the coating 74 embodiments such as coatings 74 containing hafnium carbide, tantalum carbide, hafnium diboride, zirconium carbide, hafnium nitride, tantalum nitride, zirconium nitride, and tungsten diboride, may, in some cases, be six-fold lower than that of traditional tungsten filaments at the same thermionic emission density. Accordingly, the life of the coated filament 68 may be substantially increased because the filament 68 may exhibit less material evaporation.
Another advantage of using chemicals such as hafnium carbide, tantalum carbide, hafnium diboride, zirconium carbide, hafnium nitride, tantalum nitride, zirconium nitride, tungsten diboride, and their derivatives, is that the resulting coating 74 may be very stable when disposed on the substrate 76. That is, the filament 68 may be exposed to high temperatures, for example temperatures exceeding approximately 2500° C., without the coating 74 melting or forming alloys or solutions with the underlying substrate 76. Indeed, the coating 74 may have a higher melting point than the substrate 76, including melting points of upwards of approximately 3400° C. Further, embodiments of the coating 74 may exhibit congruent evaporation, that is, the ratio of certain chemicals in the coating such as the hafnium to carbon ratio may stay constant during evaporation. Accordingly little or no variation in thermionic electron emissions may occur due to changes in chemical composition.
Turning to
In the illustrated embodiment of
Turning to
In certain embodiments useful for creating a plurality of focal spots 72, the single filament 68 in combination with one or more of the bias electrode 60, 62, 64, 66, is used. In these embodiments, one or more of the bias electrodes 60, 62, 64, 66 may actively deflect the electron beam into one or more focal spots 72. For example, one or more of the bias electrodes 60, 62, 64, 66 may define a first broad focal spot 72 by minimizing the dipole field. A second, more narrow focal spot 72, may be defined by strengthening the dipole field. Indeed, any number and types of focal spots may be defined by active manipulation of the dipole field.
In yet other embodiments, a plurality of filaments 68 may be used to define multiple focal spots 72. Each of the plurality of filaments 68 may define a focal spot 72 based on characteristics of the filament, including size, shape, coating pattern, thermionic temperature, and so forth. Accordingly, several filaments 68 may be used to define different types of focal spots 72, for example focal spots 72 having different surface areas. Additionally, the embodiments utilizing multiple filaments 68 may combine the use of one or more of the bias electrodes 60, 62, 64, 66 to aid in the definition and creation of the multiple focal spots 72 as described above.
In the illustrated embodiment of
As mentioned previously, the wound filament's 78 temperature may be regulated so that the coating 74 acts as the primary emissive layer. Accordingly, by placing the coating 74 to face the anode 16, a substantial portion of the emitted electrons 18 may impact a very small focal spot on the anode 16. The coated wound filament 78 is thus able to provide for better focal spot performance and increased cathode-target distance when compared to a traditional wound filament. Further, the coated wound filament 78 may realize a longer lifespan when compared to traditional wire wound filaments. The evaporative properties of the coating 74 allow for less material evaporation, thus increasing the operating life of the filament 78. Indeed, all filament embodiments disclosed herein, including wound filament 78, may realize longer life spans.
Turning to
Turning to
The curved substrate 87 of the curved disk emitter 86 may be shaped so as to optimally generate an electron beam 18 into a very small focal spot 72. Accordingly, a curvature (i.e., slope) of the curved substrate 87 may be calculated based on the desired size and distance from the focal spot 72. Increasing the slope of the curved substrate 87 will focus the electron beam 18 into a smaller, closer focal spot 72. Decreasing the slope of the curved substrate 87 will focus the electron beam 18 into a larger, more distant focal spot 72. Similarly, the coating 74 may also aid in focusing the electron beam 18. For example, coating a larger area of the substrate 87 will result in a more powerful electron beam 18 that may impinge on a slightly larger focal spot 72. Additionally, the curved emitter 86 may be placed in a reflector cup 84 and/or used with the bias electrodes 60, 62, 64, and 66 shown in
It is to be understood that the disclosed X-ray tube cathodes and resulting X-ray tube assemblies may be retrofitted to existing imaging systems. That is, an X-ray tube containing the disclosed cathode embodiments may replace a traditional X-ray tube. No other modification of the retrofitted imaging system may be necessary other than the replacement of the X-ray tube. In retrofits where other optimization may be desired, for example, lower operating temperatures, the drive of the retrofitted imaging system may be modified.
Technical effects of the invention include the capability to increase the cathode-target distance, the ability to decrease the focal spot size, a substantial increase in the production of X-ray radiation using traditional energy levels, and filament of longer duration. Increasing the cathode-target distance allows for the placement of other devices, such as electron collectors or beam handling magnets, inside of X-ray tube assemblies. The disclosed embodiments allow for additional focusing systems, modalities, and techniques that greatly improve the electron beam quality and power.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3558964 | White | Jan 1971 | A |
3914639 | Barraco et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4607380 | Oliver | Aug 1986 | A |
4631742 | Oliver | Dec 1986 | A |
4675570 | Green | Jun 1987 | A |
4685118 | Furbee et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4752713 | Buxbaum | Jun 1988 | A |
4821305 | Anderson | Apr 1989 | A |
4894257 | Smith et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5703924 | Hell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6051165 | Billings | Apr 2000 | A |
6642657 | Mako et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6759799 | Ricaud | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762540 | Schaefer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6785359 | Lemaitre | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6968039 | Lemaitre et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7085351 | Lu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7206379 | Lemaitre | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7280637 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7352840 | Nagarkar et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7409043 | Dunham et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450690 | Block et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7539286 | Bandy et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7558374 | Lemaitre | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7576481 | Lemaitre | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7627087 | Zou et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7693265 | Hauttmann et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7795792 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7903788 | Moore et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20010052743 | Hell et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030025429 | Hell et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050179024 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070083577 | Capaldo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070232183 | Lemaitre | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080043916 | Lemaitre | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080095317 | Lemaitre | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090260233 | Lemaitre | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323898 | Moore | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100150315 | Filmer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195797 | Hauttmann | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100284519 | Moore et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110026681 | Zou et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051898 | Moore et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61173436 | Aug 1986 | JP |
2008129006 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2010002610 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110188637 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |