BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an x-ray CT apparatus in one mode for carrying out the invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an x-ray generating device (x-ray tube) and a multi-row x-ray detector as viewed on the xy plane.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an x-ray generating device (x-ray tube) and a multi-row x-ray detector as viewed on the xy plane.
FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing the flow of imaging a subject.
FIG. 5 is a flow chart outlining the operation of the x-ray CT apparatus pertaining to one mode for carrying out the invention.
FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing details of pre-treatments.
FIG. 7 is a flow chart showing details of three-dimensional image reconstruction processing.
FIG. 8 are conceptual diagrams showing a state of projecting lines on a reconstruction region in the x-ray transmitting direction.
FIG. 9 is a conceptual diagram showing a state of projecting lines on a reconstruction region in the x-ray transmitting direction.
FIG. 10 is a conceptual diagram showing lines projected on detector faces.
FIG. 11 is a conceptual diagram showing a state of projecting projection data Dr(view, x, y) on the reconstruction region.
FIG. 12 is a conceptual diagram showing back-projection pixel data D2 of pixels on the reconstruction region.
FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a state in which back-projection data D3 are obtained by subjecting the back-projection pixel data D2 to all-view addition pixel by pixel.
FIG. 14 is a conceptual diagram showing a state of projecting lines on a circular reconstruction region in the x-ray transmitting direction.
FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a scanning condition input screen for the x-ray CT apparatus.
FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating the range in which helical scanning is possible.
FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a case of constant speed helical scanning.
FIG. 18 is a diagram showing a case of variable speed helical scanning.
FIG. 19 is a diagram showing a case in which the data collection line is inclined.
FIG. 20 is a flow chart of Implementation Example 1 of variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 21 is a diagram showing the operation of Implementation Example 1 of variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 22 is a flow chart of Implementation Example 2 of variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 23 is a diagram showing the operation of Implementation Example 2 of variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 24 is a diagram showing filter convolution of projection data in the z direction.
FIG. 25 is a diagram showing filter convolution of image space in the z direction.
FIG. 26 is a diagram showing processing of processing data view.
FIG. 27 is a table comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the method of convoluting the z-directional filter on projection data and the method of convoluting the z-directional filter on image space.
FIG. 28 is a diagram showing inconsistencies in the z-directional filter width of projection data.
FIG. 29 is a diagram showing an inconsistency-free image space z-directional filter.
FIG. 30 is a diagram showing projection data view weighting by one turn or more.
FIG. 31 is a table of projection data space z filter coefficients and image space z filter coefficients in variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 32 is a diagram showing the operation of shuttle mode variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 33 is a diagram showing the operation of variable-pitch helical scanning.
FIG. 34 is a diagram showing the positional relationship between the data collection line and the tomogram in conventional scanning (axial scanning) or cine-scanning.
FIG. 35 is a diagram showing the positional relationship between the data collection line and the tomogram in helical scanning.
FIG. 36 is a diagram showing the positional relationship among a view a and a view b opposing each other and a tomogram
FIG. 37 is a diagram showing the total imaging range and partial imaging ranges.
FIG. 38 is a diagram showing a range in which tomogram image reconstruction is possible in Implementation Example 1.
FIG. 39 is a diagram showing a range in which tomogram image reconstruction is possible in Implementation Example 2.
FIG. 40 is a diagram showing the relative actions of the x-ray data collection line and the subject by two-way variable-pitch helical scanning in the z direction (equivalent to 1.5 legs).
FIG. 41(
a) is a diagram showing the time resolution at different points in two-way helical shuttle scanning.
FIG. 41(
b) is a diagram showing the time resolution at different points in one-way helical shuttle scanning.
FIG. 42 is a diagram showing Example 1 of the relationship among the helical pitch, the number of turns of data used and the x-ray tube current of two-way variable-pitch helical scanning or helical shuttle scanning back and forth in the z direction.
FIG. 43 is a diagram showing Example 2 of the relationship among the helical pitch, the number of turns of data used and the x-ray tube current of two-way variable-pitch helical scanning or helical shuttle scanning back and forth in the z direction.
FIG. 44 is a diagram showing Example 3 of the relationship among the helical pitch, the number of turns of data used and the x-ray tube current of two-way variable-pitch helical scanning or helical shuttle scanning back and forth in the z direction.
FIG. 45 is a flow chart of an x-ray automatic exposure function which determines the x-ray tube current in consideration of the quantity of data to be used in image reconstruction.