This patent specification is in the field of x-ray imaging of the breast and, more specifically, obtaining and processing x-ray data for tomosynthesis.
Breast cancer remains an important threat to women's health. X-ray mammography currently is the most widely used breast imaging tool for early detection, and is the modality approved by the Food and Drug Administration to screen for breast cancer in women who do not show symptoms of breast disease. A typical mammography system takes a projection image of the compressed breast, using a collimated x-ray source at one side and a film/screen unit at the other side of the breast. In the United States, typically two views are taken of each breast, one from above (cranial-caudal, or CC) and one from the side (mediolateral-oblique, or MLO). The x-ray source is an x-ray tube typically operating at 25-40 kVp, using a molybdenum or rhodium rotating anode with a focal spot of about 0.3-0.4 mm and, in some cases, 0.1 mm or less. An anti-scatter grid between the breast and the film/screen unit reduces the effects of x-ray scatter. The screen converts x-ray energy to visible light to which the film is exposed to record the image. In each view, the breast is compressed to reduce patient motion and also for reasons such as reducing scatter, separating overlapping structures in the breast, making the thickness of the imaged breast more uniform, and providing more uniform x-ray exposure. Currently, flat panel array receptors are replacing the film/screen units in mammography systems. The Selenia™ digital mammography system with such a flat panel x-ray receptor is offered by Lorad, a subsidiary of the assignee Hologic, Inc. of Bedford, Mass. Digital mammography has significant advantages and in time may fully supplant film/screen systems. Additional information regarding digital mammography systems and processes offered by the common assignee can be found at <www.hologic.com>.
Mammograms, whether from film/screen units or from digital systems, are particularly difficult to read, and the rate of false negatives and false positives is significant. Many advances have been made in recent years in image acquisition and in image processing, but a need still remains to reduce the rates of false negatives and positives, at least in screening mammography. Additional information can be gained through modalities such as CT and MRI, but examination and interpretation time and cost and other factors have limited their use in screening for breast cancer. Ultrasound breast examination has been proposed as an adjunct to x-ray examination, with synthesized ultrasound images of thick slices of the breast as they would appear in the same projection view as an x-ray view displayed together with the x-ray view, and a unit taking both x-ray and ultrasound images has been proposed. See, e.g., Patent Application Publication No. U.S. 2003/0007598 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,983,123. Digital tomosynthesis has been proposed for x-ray breast imaging, and a laboratory unit is believed to have been installed at the Massachusetts General Hospital (more than a year before the filing date hereof), as reported in Wu, Tao, 2002, Three-Dimensional Mammography Reconstruction Using Low Dose Projection Images, PhD thesis, Brandeis University, incorporated here by reference. See, also, Patent Application Publication No. 2001/0038681 A1 and PCT application International Publication No. WO 03/020114 A2 published Mar. 13, 2003, both incorporated herein by reference. Digital tomosynthesis in more general contexts also has been proposed. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,289,235 and 5,051,904, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,496,557, and Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis. GE Brochure 98-5493, 11/98, all incorporated herein by reference. Reference markers can be used in x-ray imaging for purposes such as checking the rotation angle and unwanted shift of center of rotation of an x-ray source and receptor, and fiducial phantoms can be used in 3D angiography to calibrate for irregular scan geometries. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,051,904, 5,359,637, and 6,289,235, N. Navab, et al., Dynamic geometrical calibration for 3D cerebral angiography, SPIE Vol. 2708, pp. 361-370, and said PCT published application WO 03/020114 A2, all incorporated by reference here.
It is believed that no breast tomosynthesis systems are commercially available currently for clinical use in breast imaging, and that improvements in x-ray imaging and tomosynthesis are a desired goal. Accordingly, it is believed that a need remains for improved and practical tomosynthesis mammography.
In a typical x-ray imaging according to preferred embodiments disclosed in this patent specification, a patient's breast is immobilized, at the same or lower compression than in conventional mammography, between a breast platform and a compression paddle. The platform and paddle, and the breast between them, in turn are between an x-ray source and a digital imaging receptor. Unlike conventional x-ray mammography, in which typically a breast is imaged from only one angle at a given compression, here the immobilized breast is imaged with x-rays from the source that pass through the breast and impinge on the receptor, from a greater number of different positions of the source and receptor relative to the breast while maintaining the breast immobilized, to derive image data for the respective positions. To do this, the x-ray source moves around the immobilized breast, typically but not necessarily in an arc, and the receptor also moves relative to the breast, but in a motion that allows it to remain substantially parallel to the same plane. The x-ray data taken at each of a number of positions of the receptor relative to the breast is processed to form images where each of a number of the images is formed from image data acquired from two or more of the different positions, e.g., to form tomosynthetic images. The x-ray dose to the breast can be different for the different imaging positions. One or more of the imaging positions can use an x-ray dose comparable to that used for conventional mammography. These positions may be the same or similar to the source/receptor positions for the typical views used in conventional mammography, e.g., the CC view and the MLO view. Fiducial markers can be used to help assess the positions of the x-ray source and x-ray receptor relative to each other and/or the breast being imaged, and for other calibration purposes. The fiducial markers can be integrated with the compression paddle and/or the breast platform, or can be positioned otherwise to serve the intended purpose. The immobilized breast can be imaged at angular positions extending over a selected range around the immobilized breast, for example ±15°, although other ranges can be used in other examples. The motion can be continuous over some or all of the imaging positions, or can be intermittent such that the x-ray source and/or the x-ray receptor stop for taking and image and then move to the next position for the next image.
An antiscatter grid can be used, positioned between the breast platform and the x-ray receptor while x-ray image data are taken. One example is the grid available from Lorad under the tradename HTC® grid. Alternatively, the image data at some or all of the imaging positions can be taken without an antiscatter grid that is external to the x-ray receptor. Rather than using the currently conventional materials for the x-ray emitting target in an x-ray tube serving as the x-ray source, in one of the preferred embodiments the target is made essentially of Tungsten, to provide x-rays at energies that are believed more suitable for breast x-ray tomosynthesis. Geometries other than an x-ray source that rotates around the immobilized breast and an x-ray receptor that moves relative to the breast and the source but remains in substantially parallel to the same plane, can be used.
Image data taken at the different imaging positions can be processed to generate tomosynthetic images of selected slices of the breast. The images can be of thin slices, essentially planar sections through the breast, as in CT slices. Alternatively, they can be of thick slices of the breast, e.g., slices that are about 0.5 cm to about 1.0 cm thick, and simulate projection images of slices of that thickness, projected on one or more selected image planes. In one example, the image plane or planes of the thick slice images are the same as those of the typical conventional mammograms, and can be displayed for viewing in appropriate groupings. For example, projection-like tomosynthetic images of thick slices on a plane parallel to that of a conventional CC image can be displayed together with a conventional CC image of a breast, on the same screen or adjacent screens or other displays. Similarly, projection-like tomosynthetic images of thick slices on plane parallel to that of an MLO image can be displayed on the same display or on adjacent displays with a conventional MLO mammogram of the same breast. In the alternative, the image planes of the tomosynthetic images can be at one or more selected angles to the image planes of the typical images used in screening x-ray mammography.
Tomosynthetic images can be formed using a form of filtered backprojection modified by using a filter function that is significantly different from a conventional ramp filter used in CT technology backprojection. The novel filter function is believed to be uniquely suited to breast tomosynthesis. In particular, in the frequency domain the novel filter function at low spatial frequencies is much steeper than a CT technology ramp function, it is close to an all-pass filter at intermediate frequencies, and at higher frequencies it falls off to suppress fine detail noise.
For a given position of breast 102, such as a position that is the same or similar to the CC position for a conventional mammogram, source. 100 and receptor 110 can be positioned relative to immobilized breast 102 such that at the 0° position a center ray of the x-ray beam from source 100 would be substantially normal to receptor breast platform 106 and receptor 110. For a first set of image data, source 100 is at +(or −) 15° in a preferred example, and is gradually moved, continuously or intermittently to − (or +) 15°, with a set of image data taken every 3°. The angular range and the increment over which data sets are taken can each be selectively set by the operator, depending of characteristics of the breast being imaged and the screening and diagnostic needs, and can be different for different patients or from one to the other breast of the same patient. For example the source can move through angles that range from a fraction to a degree to several degrees from one imaging position to the next. Each set of image data is supplied by image readout 216 for processing at image reconstruction and display unit 218. Each set of image data can be taken at the same x-ray dose to the breast, and the dose at any one of the different imaging positions can be substantially less than that for a conventional mammogram. The x-ray dose can be substantially the same for each imaging position, but preferably the dose at one of the position, e.g., at or close to the 0° position, is the same or similar to dose for a conventional mammogram while the dose at the each of the other positions is less, preferably much less. Alternatively, the scan can begin with or end with an exposure close to the 0° position at a dose similar to a conventional mammogram, and the rest of the set of image data can be over the angular range with each exposure at an x-ray dose that is substantially less than that for a conventional mammogram. Thus, two types of images can be produced in accordance with the currently preferred embodiment while breast 102 is immobilized in the same position. One type is the same or is at least similar to a conventional mammogram, which can be read and interpreted in the manner familiar to health professionals. The other type is tomosynthetic images reconstructed from the image data and displayed either separately or as an adjunct to the display of the image that is the same or similar to a conventional mammogram. The process described above for one position of breast 102 can be repeated for another position. For example one process can be for a breast position in a manner that is the same or similar to positioning the breast for a conventional CC view, the breast can then be released, the support 204 and C-arm 200 rotated to other angular positions and the breast repositioned in a manner that is the same and similar to the position for an MLO view, and the procedure repeated.
At each imaging position, receptor 100 generates respective digital values for the pixels in a two-dimensional array. In one example, receptor 110 has a rectangular array of approximately 4096 by 3328 pixels, with a pixel size of approximately 70 micrometers in each of the column and row directions. The image data of a set (for a respective imaging position) can be processed either at the full spatial resolution of receptor 110, or at a lower effective spatial resolution, e.g., by binning several original pixel value's into a single, combined pixel value. For example, each set of 2×2 adjacent pixels can be combined into a single respective pixel value, thus achieving an effective spatial resolution of 140 micrometers in each direction. The binning can be in some other combination of original pixels, such as 2×3, and can be done by data readout electronics 216 or image reconstruction and display unit 218 (
Image reconstruction is done using backprojection in the spatial domain or in the frequency domain as in CT technology but with a novel filter that differs from the ramp filter (in the frequency domain) used in CT reconstruction. See, e.g., G. Lauritsch, et al., A theoretical framework for filtered backprojection in tomosynthesis, SPIE Medical Imaging Conference, Vol. 3338, 1998, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,442,288, both incorporated here by reference. Referring to
In a preferred embodiment, while each of all or most of the imaging positions uses lower x-ray dose than that of a conventional mammogram, higher KV can be used as compared with a conventional mammogram in order to boost signal levels from receptor 110 and improve signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios. In addition, preferable an x-ray tube with a Tungsten target is used to further exploit the advantage of higher kVp imaging of the breast, such as between 25 and 50 kVp with different x-ray beam filtration. A small focal spot, of the order of 1 mm or less, is preferred, although a larger focal spot of several mm can be used.
In other preferred embodiments, contrast enhanced breast tomosynthesis can be carried out, by obtaining tomosynthetic images as described above before injecting a contrast agent such as Iodine into the patient, then repeating the process after injection, and subtracting images of the pre-injection and post-injection sets. Another preferred embodiment involves time subtraction tomosynthesis, related to subtracting comparable images obtained at different times. Yet another is dual-energy breast tomosynthesis, whereby two tomosynthetic images at low and high energies are acquired and then subtracted, the two images being acquired through a process such as using successive scans at two different x-ray energy ranges or by alternating x-ray pulses of low and high energy to create the two images. Another other preferred embodiment involves obtaining and displaying both x-ray tomosynthetic images of a breast and ultrasound images of the same breast. Computer aided diagnosis, as known to those skilled in the art and as commercially used currently in the United States, can be applied to selected tomosynthetic images generated as described above.
Fiducial markers are used in preferred embodiments for off-line (without a breast) mechanical positioning and calibration and/or on-line (while imaging a breast with x-rays) image based positioning encoding of moving components. The fiducial markers can be made of a material such as lead or another metal, and can be in the form of points or lines or arrows or crosses, at locations that would be imaged by the x-ray beam at receptor 110 simultaneously with the imaging of a breast 102 but outside the area of the breast image. The fiducial markers are integrated with compression paddle 104, or they can be at or near breast platform 106, or they can be supported separately from paddle 104, for example on a separate member that can be selectively brought into the path of the imaging x-ray beam or taken out of that path, e.g., to take an image that is the same or similar to a conventional mammogram. Different patterns or types of fiducial markers can be provided, for selection by the user.
An alternative embodiment, illustrated schematically in a front view in
In each of the embodiments of
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/896,828, filed May 17, 2013, entitled “X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY WITH TOMOSYNTHESIS”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,638,994, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/879,807, filed Sep. 10, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,486, filed Nov. 26, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3365575 | Strax | Jan 1968 | A |
3502878 | Stewart | Mar 1970 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4160906 | Daniels et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4310766 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4380086 | Vagi | Apr 1983 | A |
4496557 | Malen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4513433 | Weiss et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4542521 | Hahn et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4662379 | Macovski | May 1987 | A |
4706269 | Reina et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4721856 | Saotome et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4744099 | Huettenrauch et al. | May 1988 | A |
4752948 | MacMahon | Jun 1988 | A |
4760589 | Siczek | Jul 1988 | A |
4763343 | Yanaki | Aug 1988 | A |
4773086 | Fujita et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4773087 | Plewes | Sep 1988 | A |
4819258 | Kleinman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821727 | Levene et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4901335 | Ferlic | Feb 1990 | A |
4969174 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998270 | Scheid et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018176 | Romeas et al. | May 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | Jul 1991 | E |
5029193 | Saffer | Jul 1991 | A |
5051904 | Griffith | Sep 1991 | A |
5078142 | Siczek et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5142557 | Toker | Aug 1992 | A |
5163075 | Lubinsky et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5164976 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5212637 | Saxena | May 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5256370 | Slattery et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5274690 | Burke | Dec 1993 | A |
5289520 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291539 | Thumann et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5313510 | Ebersberger | May 1994 | A |
5359637 | Webber | Oct 1994 | A |
5365562 | Toker | Nov 1994 | A |
5415169 | Siczek et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426685 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5451789 | Wong | Sep 1995 | A |
5452367 | Bick et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5479927 | Shmulewitz | Jan 1996 | A |
5483072 | Coe | Jan 1996 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526394 | Siczek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528658 | Hell | Jun 1996 | A |
5539797 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
5594769 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596200 | Sharma et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598454 | Franetzki et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606589 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609152 | Pellegrino et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
5657362 | Giger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668844 | Webber | Sep 1997 | A |
5668889 | Hara | Sep 1997 | A |
5706327 | Adamkowski et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719952 | Rooks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803912 | Siczek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818898 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828722 | Ploetz et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841829 | Dolazza | Nov 1998 | A |
5844242 | Jalink, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844965 | Galkin | Dec 1998 | A |
5864146 | Karellas | Jan 1999 | A |
5872828 | Niklason | Feb 1999 | A |
5878104 | Ploetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5896437 | Ploetz | Apr 1999 | A |
5930330 | Wolfe | Jul 1999 | A |
5941832 | Tumey et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970118 | Sokolov | Oct 1999 | A |
5983123 | Shmulewitz | Nov 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999836 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005907 | Ploetz | Dec 1999 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081577 | Webber | Jun 2000 | A |
6091841 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6137527 | Abdel-Malek et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141398 | He et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167115 | Inoue | Dec 2000 | A |
6175117 | Komardin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196715 | Nambu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207958 | Giakos | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233473 | Shepherd et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243441 | Zur | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244507 | Garland | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256369 | Lai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256370 | Yavuz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269176 | Barski | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272207 | Tang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282264 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289235 | Webber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292530 | Yavus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292531 | Hsieh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341156 | Baetz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345194 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375352 | Hewes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6399951 | Paulus | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411836 | Patel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415015 | Nicolas et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6418189 | Schafer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442288 | Haerer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459925 | Nields et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463181 | Duarte | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6480565 | Ning | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490476 | Townsend et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496557 | Wilson | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501819 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6542575 | Schubert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553096 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556655 | Chichereau et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574304 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574629 | Cooke, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597762 | Ferrant et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611575 | Alyassin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620111 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632020 | Kaufhold | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633626 | Trotter | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633674 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647092 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6674835 | Kaufhold | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6702459 | Barnes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6744848 | Stanton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748044 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748046 | Thayer | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748047 | Gonzalez | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751285 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813334 | Koppe et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846289 | Besson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6882700 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885724 | Li et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6895076 | Halsmer | May 2005 | B2 |
6901132 | Eberhard | May 2005 | B2 |
6909790 | Tumey et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909792 | Carrott et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912319 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931093 | Op De Beek et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940943 | Claus et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950492 | Besson | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950493 | Besson | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957099 | Arnone et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6960020 | Lai | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970531 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970586 | Baertsch | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978040 | Berestov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987831 | Ning | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999554 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7001071 | Deuringer | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016461 | Rotondo | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7092482 | Besson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110490 | Eberhard et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110502 | Tsuji | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116749 | Besson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123684 | Jing et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127091 | Op De Beek et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142633 | Eberhard et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7190758 | Hagiwara | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206462 | Betke | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7218766 | Eberhard | May 2007 | B2 |
7244063 | Eberhard | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245694 | Jing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263214 | Uppaluri | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7286645 | Freudenberger | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302031 | Hjarn et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315607 | Ramsauer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319734 | Besson | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319735 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319736 | Rotondo | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323692 | Rowlands et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331264 | Ozawa | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356113 | Wu | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7430272 | Jing et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433507 | Jabri | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443949 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7577282 | Gkanatsios et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583786 | Jing et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609806 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609808 | Tornai | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616731 | Pack | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616801 | Gkanatsios et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630531 | Chui | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7688940 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697660 | Ning | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702142 | Ren et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7760853 | Jing et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760924 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792245 | Hitzke et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831296 | Defreitas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839979 | Hauttmann | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869563 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7869862 | Seppi | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881428 | Jing et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885384 | Mannar | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894646 | Shirahata et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7916915 | Gkanatsios et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949091 | Jing et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7986765 | Defreitas et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991106 | Ren et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8031834 | Ludwig | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8131049 | Ruth et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8155421 | Ren et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170320 | Smith et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175219 | Defreitas et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8285020 | Gkanatsios et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8416915 | Jing et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452379 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457282 | Baorui et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8515005 | Ren et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8559595 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565372 | Stein et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565374 | DeFreitas et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565860 | Kimchy | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571289 | Ruth et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8712127 | Ren et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8767911 | Ren et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787522 | Smith et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8831171 | Jing et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8853635 | O'Connor | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8873716 | Ren et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9042612 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9226721 | Ren et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9502148 | Ren | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9895115 | Ren | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10719223 | Gkanatsios | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsujii | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048343 | Launay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020050986 | Inouc et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070970 | Wood et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075997 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090055 | Zur et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094062 | Dolazza | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122533 | Marie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126798 | Harris | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030007598 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010923 | Zur | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018272 | Treado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026386 | Tang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058989 | Rotondo | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072409 | Kaufhold et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072417 | Kaufhold et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073895 | Nields et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095624 | Eberhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097055 | Yanof et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030149364 | Kapur | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169847 | Karellas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194050 | Eberhard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194051 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194121 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210254 | Doan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212327 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215120 | Uppaluri et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008809 | Webber | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040066882 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066884 | Hermann Claus et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066904 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070582 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094167 | Brady et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101095 | Jing et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109529 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146221 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171986 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190682 | Deuringer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213378 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040247081 | Halsmer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264627 | Besson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050025278 | Hagiwara | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063509 | DeFreitas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078797 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089205 | Kapur | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105679 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117694 | Francke | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129172 | Mertelmeier | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133706 | Eberhard | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135555 | Claus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135664 | Kaufhold et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050226375 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248347 | Damadian | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009693 | Hanover et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034426 | Freudenberger | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074288 | Kelly | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098855 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109951 | Popescu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126780 | Rotondo | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129062 | Nicoson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155209 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060210016 | Francke | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060262898 | Partain | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269041 | Mertelmeier | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291618 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070030949 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036265 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076844 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078335 | Horn | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140419 | Souchay | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070223651 | Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242800 | Jing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080019581 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045833 | Defreitas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056436 | Pack | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101537 | Sendai | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112534 | Defreitas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118023 | Besson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130979 | Ren et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080212861 | Durgan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080285712 | Kopans | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080317196 | Lmai | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003519 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010384 | Jing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080594 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080602 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135997 | Defreitas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141859 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090213987 | Stein et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090237924 | Ladewig | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238424 | Arakita et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090268865 | Ren et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296882 | Gkanatsios et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304147 | Jing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020937 | Hautmann | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020938 | Koch | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034450 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054400 | Ren | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086188 | Ruth | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091940 | Ludwig et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150306 | Defreitas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100189227 | Mannar | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195882 | Ren | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226475 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290585 | Eliasson | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303202 | Ren | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313196 | De Atley et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026667 | Poorter | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069809 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110178389 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188624 | Ren | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234630 | Batman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110268246 | Dafni | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120033868 | Ren | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051502 | Ohta et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120236987 | Ruimi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238870 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130028374 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130211261 | Wang | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130272494 | DeFreitas et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140044230 | Stein et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140044231 | Defreitas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140086471 | Ruth et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098935 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140232752 | Ren et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140314198 | Ren et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321607 | Smith | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140376690 | Jing et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150049859 | DeFreitas et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150160848 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150310611 | Gkanatsios et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160106383 | Ren et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160189376 | Bernard | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160209995 | Jeon | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160220207 | Jouhikainen | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160256125 | Smith | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160270742 | Stein et al. | Sep 2016 | A9 |
20160302746 | Erhard | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331339 | Guo | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170024113 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032546 | Westerhoff | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170071562 | Suzuki | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170128028 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170135650 | Stein et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170316588 | Homann | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170319167 | Goto | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180130201 | Bernard | May 2018 | A1 |
20180177476 | Jing et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180188937 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180289347 | DeFreitas et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190059830 | Williams | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190095087 | Gkanatsios | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190200942 | DeFreitas | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190336794 | Li | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190388051 | Morita | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200029927 | Wilson | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200352531 | Smith | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210128087 | DeFreitas | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102222594 | Oct 2011 | CN |
4104166 | Aug 1992 | DE |
102004051401 | May 2006 | DE |
102004051820 | May 2006 | DE |
102010027871 | Oct 2011 | DE |
0775467 | May 1997 | EP |
0982001 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1028451 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1428473 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1759637 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1569556 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2732764 | May 2014 | EP |
2602743 | Nov 2014 | EP |
2819145 | Dec 2014 | EP |
3143935 | Mar 2017 | EP |
53151381 | Nov 1978 | JP |
2001-346786 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002219124 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2006-231054 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-50264 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-521911 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007229269 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008-67933 | Mar 2008 | JP |
200886471 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009500048 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2012-509714 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012-511988 | May 2012 | JP |
2015-530706 | Oct 2015 | JP |
WO 9005485 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9803115 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9816903 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0051484 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 2000068863 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 03020114 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03037046 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2003057564 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004043535 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2005051197 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006055830 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007129244 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008072144 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009122328 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009136349 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010070554 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2013184213 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Niklason, Loren T., Bradley T. Christian, Laura E. Niklason, Daniel B. Kopans, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Donald E. Castleberry, Beale H. Opsahl-Ong, Cynthia E. Landberg, and Brian Giambattista. “Digital breast tomosynthesis: potentially a new method for breast cancer screening.” In Digital Mammography (Year: 1998). |
Thurfjell, E. “Mammography screening: one versus two views and independent double reading.” Acta Radiologica 35, No. 4 (1994): 345-350. |
Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, Public Version, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C, Inv. No. 337-Ta-1063, in the matter of Certain X-Ray Breast Imaging Devices and Components Thereof, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 299 pages. |
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in case IPR2018-00651 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296 B2) , in the matter of Fujifilm Corporation, Fujfilm Medical Systems USA, and Fujifilm Techno Products Co., Ltd. (Petitioner) v. Hologic, Inc., (Patent Owner), dated Aug. 21, 2018, 21 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of the U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296, Fujifilm Corp. et al. v. Hologic Inc., 85 pages. |
Corrected Petition for Inter Partes Review of the U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296, Fujifilm Corp. et al. v. Hologic Inc., 85 pages. |
Ex. 1001 Declaration of Dr. John Allison, 169 pages. |
Ex. 1002 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. John Allison, 7 pages. |
Ex. 1003 U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296 (“The '296 Patent”), 13 pages. |
Ex. 1004 Patent File History for the '296 Patent, 379 pages. |
Ex. 1005 U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684 (“The '684 Patent”), 11 pages. |
Ex. 1006 U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,828 to Loren T. Niklason et al. (“Niklason”), 14 pages. |
Ex. 1007 Development and Clinical Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Digital Mammography by Daniel B. Kopans, M.D. (“Kopans”), 91 pages. |
Ex. 1008 Tomosynthesis Breast Imaging: Early Detection and Characterization of Breast Cancer by Leena M. Hamberg, PhD (“Hamberg”), 20 pages. |
Ex. 1009 U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0090055 naming Albert Zur, et al. as inventors (“Zur”), 11 pages. |
Ex. 1010 U.S. Pat. No. 4,613,982 to Dornheim, et al. (“Dornheim”), 4 pages. |
Ex. 1011 U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,020 to Kaufhold, et al. (“Kaufhold”), 15 pages. |
Ex. 1012 E-mail dated Nov. 1, 2017 from Carol E. Jacobsen, Chief, Customer Support Division, Directorate of User Services, Defense Technical Information Center, 2 pages. |
Ex. 1013 Archived copies of public webpages, dated Aug. 2000, on the Defense Technical Information Center's website obtained from the Internet Archive, 8 pages. |
Ex. 1014 Archived copies of public webpages, dated Aug. 2000, on the website of National Technical Information Services (“NTIS”) obtained from the Internet Archive, 15 pages. |
Ex. 1015 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager of the Internet Archive, dated Dec. 28, 2017, 2 pages. |
Ex. 1016 Print out of web page showing search results for Kopans in the NTIS collection, 2 pages. |
Ex. 1017 U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379 (the “'379 Patent”), 12 pages. |
Ex. 1018 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM and Boone JM, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002 (excerpts), 23 pages. |
Ex. 1019 “Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications” by S.L. Lou et al. published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2000; 24:205-220 (“Lou”), 16 pages. |
Ex. 1020 Instrumentarium Imaging, “Diamond Breast Care,” copyright 2003, 20 pages. |
Ex. 1021 “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging,” Loren T. Niklason, PhD, et al., Radiology 1997; 205:399-406 (“Niklason”), 8 pages. |
Ex. 1022 Dobbins, J.T., Godfrey, D.J., “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: Current state of the art and clinical potential,” Phys. Med. Biol. 2003 vol. 48:R65-R106, 42 pages. |
Ex. 1023 Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H08-186762 identifying Shinichi Yamada and Seiichiro Nagai as inventors (“Yamada”), 41 pages. |
Ex. 1024 Certified translation of Yamada, 42 pages. |
Ex. 1025 U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,285 to Jeffrey Wayne Eberhard (“Eberhard”), 11 pages. |
Ex. 1026 U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,575 to Abdalmajeid Musa Alyassin, et al. (“Alyassin”), 12 pages. |
Ex. 1027 S. Vedantham et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art,” Radiology 277(3), 663-684, 22 pages. |
Ex. 1028 Ingrid Reiser & Stephen Glick, Tomosynthesis Imaging (2014) (excerpts), 8 pages. |
Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,521 to Hahn, et al. (“Hahn”), 4 pages. |
Ex. 1030 U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,218 to Matsumoto (“Matsumoto”), 26 pages. |
Ex. 1031 Japanese Utility Model Patent Publication No. S58-16640, identifying Shigekazu Hara et al. as inventors (“Hara”), 10 pages. |
Ex. 1032 Certified translation of Hara, 11 pages. |
Ex. 1033 Declaration of Frances Cheever, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 3 pages. |
Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review in case IPR2018-00672 (Patent 8,452,379 B2), in the matter of Fujifilm Corporation, Fujfilm Medical Systems USA, and Fujifilm Techno Products Co., Ltd. (Petitioner) v. Hologic, Inc., (Patent Owner), dated Sep. 4, 2018, 17 pages. |
Decision Denying inter Partes Review in case IPR2018-00538 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684 B2), in the matter of Fujifilm Corporation, (Petitioner) v. Hologic, Inc., (Patent Owner), dated Jul. 27, 2018, 31 pages. |
Kachelriess, Marc et al., “Flying Focal Spot (FFS) in Cone-Beam CT”, 2004 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Oct. 16-22, 2004, Rome Italy, vol. 6, pp. 3759-3763. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of the U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379, Fujifilm Corp. et al. v. Hologic Inc., 88 pages. |
Ex. 1001 Declaration of Dr. John Allison, 168 pages. |
Ex. 1003 U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379 (the '379 Patent), 13 pages. |
Ex. 1004 Patent File History for the '379 Patent, 265 pages. |
Ex. 1006 U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,828 to Loren T. Niklason et al. (“Niklason”) Ex. 1007 Development and Clinical Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Digital Mammography by Daniel B. Kopans, M.D. (“Kopans”), 14 pages. |
Ex. 1011 Patent File History for U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296, 379 pages. |
Ex. 1014 Archived copies of public webpages, dated Aug. 2000, on the website of National Technical Information Services (“NTIS”) obtained from the Internet Archive, 14 pages. |
Ex. 1016 Print out of web page showing search results for Kopans and Hamberg in the NTIS collection, 2 pages. |
Ex. 1017 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM and Boone JM, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002 (excerpts), 23 pages. |
Ex. 1018 “Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications” by S.L. Lou et al. published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2000; 24:205-220 (“Lou”), 16 pages. |
Ex. 1019 Instrumentarium Imaging, “Diamond Breast Care,” copyright 2003, 20 pages. |
Ex. 1020 “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging,” Loren T. Niklason, PhD, et al., Radiology 1997; 205:399-406 (“Niklason”), 8 pages. |
Ex. 1021 Dobbins, J.T., Godfrey, D.J., “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: Current state of the art and clinical potential,” Phys. Med. Biol. 2003 vol. 48:R65-R106, 42 pages. |
Ex. 1022 Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H08-186762 identifying Shinichi Yamada and Seiichiro Nagai as inventors (“Yamada”), 41 pages. |
Ex. 1023 Certified translation of Yamada, 42 pages. |
Ex. 1024 U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,285 to Jeffrey Wayne Eberhard (“Eberhard”), 11 pages. |
Ex. 1025 U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,575 to Abdalmajeid Musa Alyassin, et al. (“Alyassin”), 12 pages. |
Ex. 1026 S. Vedantham et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art,” Radiology 277(3), 663-684, 22 pages. |
Ex. 1027 Ingrid Reiser & Stephen Glick, Tomosynthesis Imaging (2014) (excerpts), 8 pages. |
Ex. 1028 U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,521 to Hahn, et al. (“Hahn”), 4 pages. |
Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,218 to Matsumoto (“Matsumoto”), 26 pages. |
Ex. 1030 Japanese Utility Model Patent Publication No. S58-16640, identifying Shigekazu Hara et al. as inventors (“Hara”), 10 pages. |
Ex. 1031 Certified translation of Hara, 11 pages. |
Ex. 1032 Declaration of Frances Cheever, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 3 pages. |
“Essentials for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography system”, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-EN-US, 2006, 12 pgs. |
“Filtered Back Projection,” (Nygren) published May 8, 2007; URL:http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/-.about.e1e0539/Projects97/cult/node2.html., 2 pgs. |
“Lorad Selenia” Document B-BI-SEO US/Intl (May 2006) copyright Hologic 2006, 12 pgs. |
Acrin website, located at https://www.acrin.org/PATIENTS/ABOUTIMAGINGEXAMSANDAGENTS/ABOUTMAMMOGRAPHYANDTOMOSYNTHESIS.aspx, “About Mammography and Tomosnythesis”, obtained online on Dec. 8, 2015, 5 pgs. |
American College of Radiology website, located at http://www.acr.org/FAQs/DBT-FAQ, “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis FAQ for Insurers”, obtained online on Dec. 8, 2015, 2 pages. |
Arfelli, F. et al., “Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques”, Apr. 2000, retrieved at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751500, 8 pages. |
Aslund, Magnus, “Digital Mammography with a Photon Counting Detector in a Scanned Multislit Geometry”, Doctoral Thesis, Dept of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, Apr. 2007, 51 pages. |
Boone, J. et al., “Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation”, Dec. 31, 2001, retrieved at: http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.2213010334,11 pages. |
Chan, Heang-Ping et al., “ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005, 7 pgs. |
Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Scale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005. |
Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98-5493, Nov. 1998, 8 pgs. |
Dobbins, James T., “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Taylor and Francis LTD, London GB, vol. 48, No. 19, Oct. 7, 2003, 42 pages. |
Federica Pediconi et al., “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of a new software for MR-based breast imaging”, International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086. |
Grant, David G., “Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional imaging technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, vol. BME-19, #1, Jan. 1972, pp. 20-28. |
Hamberg, Leena M., “Tomosynthesis breast imaging: early detection and characterization of breast cancer”, prepared by Massachusetts General Hospital for the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command Fort Detrick, Maryland, Jul. 2000, 20 pages. |
Japanese Office Action mailed in Application 2016-087710, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 5 pages. |
Japanese Office Action mailed in Application 2017-001579, dated Mar. 29, 2017, 1 page. (No English Translation.). |
Kapur, Ajay et al., “Combination of Digital Mammography with Semiautomated 3D Breast Ultrasound”, Aug. 1, 2004, retrieved at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/153303460400300402, 10 pages. |
Kita et al., “Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using simulation of breast deformation”, Proceedings 1998 IEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 23-25, 1998, pp. 700-707. |
Kopans, D., “Development and Clinical Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Digital Mammography”, Oct. 31, 2000, retrieved at: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA387722, 91 pages. |
Kopans, Daniel B., “Breast Imaging”, Chapter 26: Future Advances in Breast Imaging, 2nd Edition, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1998, 37 pages. |
Lehmann, V. et al., “MEMS techniques applied to the fabrication of anti-scatter grids for X-ray imaging”, 2002, retrieved at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/S_Ronnebeck/publication/222546207_MEMS_techniques_applied_to_the_fabrication_of anti-scatter_grids_for_Xray_imaging/links/5570136f08aeccd777417301/MEMS-techniques-applied-to-the-fabrication-of-anti-scatter-grids-for-X-ray-imaging.pdf, 6 pages. |
Mammographic Accreditation Phantom, http://www.cirsinc.com/pdfs/015cp.pdf. (2006), 2 pgs. |
Niklason et al., “Digital Breast Imaging: Tomosynthesis and Digital Subtraction Mammography”, Breast Disease, vol. 10, No. 3-4, pp. 151-164, 1998. |
Niklason, Loren T. et al., “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging”, Radiology, Nov. 1997, vol. 205, No. 2, pp. 399-406. |
Nykanen, Kirsi et al., “X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography”, Jul. 2003, retrieved at: http://www.siltanen-research.net/publ/NykanenSiltanen2003.pdf, 10 pages. |
Pisano, Etta D., “Digital Mammography”, Radiology, vol. 234, No. 2, Feb. 2005, pp. 353-362. |
Senographe 700 & 800T (GE); 2-page download on Jun. 22, 2006 from www.gehealthcare.com/inen/rad/whe/products/mswh800t.html.; Figures 1-7 on 4 sheets re lateral shift compression paddle, 2 pgs. |
Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008, 8 pgs. |
Smith, Andrew, PhD, “Full Field Breast Tomosynthesis”, Hologic White Paper, Oct. 2004, 6 pgs. |
Suryanarayanan, S. et al., “Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography”, Dec. 31, 2000, retrieved at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633200800616, 13 pages. |
Suryanarayanan, S. et al., “Evaluation of Linear and Nonlinear Tomosynthetic Reconstruction Methods in Digital Mammography”, Mar. 2001, retrieved at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633203805305, 6 pages. |
Webber, Richard, “A controlled evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography applied to digital spot mammography”, Feb. 2000, retrieved at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3453191/, 8 pages. |
Wheeler F. W., et al. “Micro-Calcification Detection in Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, Conf—Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Dec. 11, 2001 to Dec. 15, 2001, Delhi, SPIE, US, vol. 6144, Feb. 13, 2006, 12 pgs. |
Wu, T. et al., “A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis”, Aug. 26, 2004, retrieved at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1118/1.1786692/full. |
Wu, Tao, et al. “Tomographic Mammography Using a Limited Number of Low-Dose Cone-Beam Projection Images” Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, vol. 30, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2003, p. 365-380. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection in Application 2018-554775, dated Feb. 22, 2021, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180344276 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10723486 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 12879807 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13896828 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 16004151 | US | |
Parent | 12879807 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13896828 | US |