X-ray mammography with tomosynthesis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11096644
  • Patent Number
    11,096,644
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 8, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method and system for producing tomosynthetic images of a patient's breast. An x-ray source that delivers x-rays through a breast immobilized and compressed between a compression paddle and a breast platform and form an image at a digital x-ray receptor panel. Multiple x-ray images are taken as the x-ray source and the receptor move relative to the immobilized breast. In one preferred embodiment, the x-ray source travels from −15° to +15°. The source can travel in an arc around the breast while the receptor travels linearly while remaining parallel and at the same distance from the breast platform. The sets of x-ray image data taken at different angles are combined to form tomosynthetic images that can be viewed in different formats, alone or as an adjunct to conventional mammograms.
Description
FIELD

This patent specification is in the field of x-ray imaging of the breast and, more specifically, obtaining and processing x-ray data for tomosynthesis.


BACKGROUND

Breast cancer remains an important threat to women's health. X-ray mammography currently is the most widely used breast imaging tool for early detection, and is the modality approved by the Food and Drug Administration to screen for breast cancer in women who do not show symptoms of breast disease. A typical mammography system takes a projection image of the compressed breast, using a collimated x-ray source at one side and a film/screen unit at the other side of the breast. In the United States, typically two views are taken of each breast, one from above (cranial-caudal, or CC) and one from the side (mediolateral-oblique, or MLO). The x-ray source is an x-ray tube typically operating at 25-40 kVp, using a molybdenum or rhodium rotating anode with a focal spot of about 0.3-0.4 mm and, in some cases, 0.1 mm or less. An anti-scatter grid between the breast and the film/screen unit reduces the effects of x-ray scatter. The screen converts x-ray energy to visible light to which the film is exposed to record the image. In each view, the breast is compressed to reduce patient motion and also for reasons such as reducing scatter, separating overlapping structures in the breast, making the thickness of the imaged breast more uniform, and providing more uniform x-ray exposure. Currently, flat panel array receptors are replacing the film/screen units in mammography systems. The Selenia™ digital mammography system with such a flat panel x-ray receptor is offered by Lorad, a subsidiary of the assignee Hologic, Inc. of Bedford, Mass. Digital mammography has significant advantages and in time may fully supplant film/screen systems. Additional information regarding digital mammography systems and processes offered by the common assignee can be found at <www.hologic.com>.


Mammograms, whether from film/screen units or from digital systems, are particularly difficult to read, and the rate of false negatives and false positives is significant. Many advances have been made in recent years in image acquisition and in image processing, but a need still remains to reduce the rates of false negatives and positives, at least in screening mammography. Additional information can be gained through modalities such as CT and MRI, but examination and interpretation time and cost and other factors have limited their use in screening for breast cancer. Ultrasound breast examination has been proposed as an adjunct to x-ray examination, with synthesized ultrasound images of thick slices of the breast as they would appear in the same projection view as an x-ray view displayed together with the x-ray view, and a unit taking both x-ray and ultrasound images has been proposed. See, e.g., Patent Application Publication No. U.S. 2003/0007598 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,983,123. Digital tomosynthesis has been proposed for x-ray breast imaging, and a laboratory unit is believed to have been installed at the Massachusetts General Hospital (more than a year before the filing date hereof), as reported in Wu, Tao, 2002, Three-Dimensional Mammography Reconstruction Using Low Dose Projection Images, PhD thesis, Brandeis University, incorporated here by reference. See, also, Patent Application Publication No. 2001/0038681 A1 and PCT application International Publication No. WO 03/020114 A2 published Mar. 13, 2003, both incorporated herein by reference. Digital tomosynthesis in more general contexts also has been proposed. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,289,235 and 5,051,904, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,496,557, and Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis. GE Brochure 98-5493, 11/98, all incorporated herein by reference. Reference markers can be used in x-ray imaging for purposes such as checking the rotation angle and unwanted shift of center of rotation of an x-ray source and receptor, and fiducial phantoms can be used in 3D angiography to calibrate for irregular scan geometries. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,051,904, 5,359,637, and 6,289,235, N. Navab, et al., Dynamic geometrical calibration for 3D cerebral angiography, SPIE Vol. 2708, pp. 361-370, and said PCT published application WO 03/020114 A2, all incorporated by reference here.


It is believed that no breast tomosynthesis systems are commercially available currently for clinical use in breast imaging, and that improvements in x-ray imaging and tomosynthesis are a desired goal. Accordingly, it is believed that a need remains for improved and practical tomosynthesis mammography.


SUMMARY

In a typical x-ray imaging according to preferred embodiments disclosed in this patent specification, a patient's breast is immobilized, at the same or lower compression than in conventional mammography, between a breast platform and a compression paddle. The platform and paddle, and the breast between them, in turn are between an x-ray source and a digital imaging receptor. Unlike conventional x-ray mammography, in which typically a breast is imaged from only one angle at a given compression, here the immobilized breast is imaged with x-rays from the source that pass through the breast and impinge on the receptor, from a greater number of different positions of the source and receptor relative to the breast while maintaining the breast immobilized, to derive image data for the respective positions. To do this, the x-ray source moves around the immobilized breast, typically but not necessarily in an arc, and the receptor also moves relative to the breast, but in a motion that allows it to remain substantially parallel to the same plane. The x-ray data taken at each of a number of positions of the receptor relative to the breast is processed to form images where each of a number of the images is formed from image data acquired from two or more of the different positions, e.g., to form tomosynthetic images. The x-ray dose to the breast can be different for the different imaging positions. One or more of the imaging positions can use an x-ray dose comparable to that used for conventional mammography. These positions may be the same or similar to the source/receptor positions for the typical views used in conventional mammography, e.g., the CC view and the MLO view. Fiducial markers can be used to help assess the positions of the x-ray source and x-ray receptor relative to each other and/or the breast being imaged, and for other calibration purposes. The fiducial markers can be integrated with the compression paddle and/or the breast platform, or can be positioned otherwise to serve the intended purpose. The immobilized breast can be imaged at angular positions extending over a selected range around the immobilized breast, for example ±15°, although other ranges can be used in other examples. The motion can be continuous over some or all of the imaging positions, or can be intermittent such that the x-ray source and/or the x-ray receptor stop for taking and image and then move to the next position for the next image.


An antiscatter grid can be used, positioned between the breast platform and the x-ray receptor while x-ray image data are taken. One example is the grid available from Lorad under the tradename HTC® grid. Alternatively, the image data at some or all of the imaging positions can be taken without an antiscatter grid that is external to the x-ray receptor. Rather than using the currently conventional materials for the x-ray emitting target in an x-ray tube serving as the x-ray source, in one of the preferred embodiments the target is made essentially of Tungsten, to provide x-rays at energies that are believed more suitable for breast x-ray tomosynthesis. Geometries other than an x-ray source that rotates around the immobilized breast and an x-ray receptor that moves relative to the breast and the source but remains in substantially parallel to the same plane, can be used.


Image data taken at the different imaging positions can be processed to generate tomosynthetic images of selected slices of the breast. The images can be of thin slices, essentially planar sections through the breast, as in CT slices. Alternatively, they can be of thick slices of the breast, e.g., slices that are about 0.5 cm to about 1.0 cm thick, and simulate projection images of slices of that thickness, projected on one or more selected image planes. In one example, the image plane or planes of the thick slice images are the same as those of the typical conventional mammograms, and can be displayed for viewing in appropriate groupings. For example, projection-like tomosynthetic images of thick slices on a plane parallel to that of a conventional CC image can be displayed together with a conventional CC image of a breast, on the same screen or adjacent screens or other displays. Similarly, projection-like tomosynthetic images of thick slices on plane parallel to that of an MLO image can be displayed on the same display or on adjacent displays with a conventional MLO mammogram of the same breast. In the alternative, the image planes of the tomosynthetic images can be at one or more selected angles to the image planes of the typical images used in screening x-ray mammography.


Tomosynthetic images can be formed using a form of filtered backprojection modified by using a filter function that is significantly different from a conventional ramp filter used in CT technology backprojection. The novel filter function is believed to be uniquely suited to breast tomosynthesis. In particular, in the frequency domain the novel filter function at low spatial frequencies is much steeper than a CT technology ramp function, it is close to an all-pass filter at intermediate frequencies, and at higher frequencies it falls off to suppress fine detail noise.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 illustrates schematically a front view of an x-ray source, a breast immobilized between a compression paddle and a breast platform, an antiscatter grid and an image receptor, where the x-ray source and the x-ray receptor move relative to the breast for imaging the breast at different angles according to a preferred embodiment.



FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of the system illustrated in FIG. 1 and additional components of a system according to a preferred embodiment.



FIG. 3 illustrates a display arrangement showing both images that are the same or similar to conventional mammograms and tomosynthetic images according to a preferred embodiment.



FIG. 4 illustrates in graph form a backprojection filter in the frequency domain used in a preferred embodiment, compared with a conventional ramp filter used in CT technology and an all-pass filter.



FIG. 5 illustrates coordinate values of a backprojection filter according to a preferred embodiment as control point values in the frequency domain in log scale.



FIG. 6 illustrates the use of fiducial markers.



FIGS. 7 and 8 are similar to FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively, but illustrate another preferred embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates in front view an x-ray source 100 in three different positions 100a, 100b and 100c, between which source 100 moves in an arc centered at the top center of a patient's breast 102 immobilized between a compression paddle 104 and a breast platform 106. An antiscatter grid 108 is immediately below breast platform 106, and an x-ray receptor 110 is below grid 108, and is shown in three different positions, 110a, 110b, and 110c, corresponding to the illustrated positions of source 100. Receptor 110 moves relative to immobilized breast 102 along a path substantially parallel to breast platform 106 and maintains substantially the same distance from platform 106, as indicated by the arrows in FIG. 1. In operation, source 100 moves from one of its illustrated position to another, and so does receptor 110. At each position of source 100 and receptor 110, source 100 is energized to emit a collimated x-ray beam, of which only the center ray is illustrated. The beam irradiates breast 102 and some of the radiation that has passed through the breast also passes through grid 108 and is received by receptor 110. As in known in the art, receptor 110 and associated electronics generate image data in digital form for each pixel of a rectangular grid of pixels at each of the illustrated angular position of source 100 and translation positions of receptor 110 relative to immobilized breast 102. While only three positions are illustrated in FIG. 1, in practice image data is taken at each of a much greater number of positions, for example, at every 1° of an arc of ±15° of source 100 around immobilized breast 102. The taking of image data can be while source 100 and receptor 110 are stopped at their respective positions, after moving from one position to the next. In a different preferred embodiment, the motion of one or both of source 100 and receptor 110 can be continuous, with a respective set of image data being accumulated over a small increment of continuous motion, say a 0.1° to 0.5° arc of motion of source 100. These parameters are only an example. Different preferred embodiments can use different ranges of motion of source 100 and receptor 110, and can use a motion of source 100 that is arcuate and centered at a different point, such as in immobilized breast 102 or at breast platform 106 or at grid 108 or at receptor 110, or a motion that is not arcuate but is translational or is a combination of different types of motions, such as partly translational and partly rotational. In the most preferred embodiment, the source 100 motion is arcuate and the receptor 110 motion is translational. As described further below, in practice source 100 can be integrated in a C-arm that is the same or similar to the C-arm used in the commercially available Selenia® or MIV mammography systems available from Lorad, and receptor 110 can be the same receptor as used in such commercially available systems but mounted differently so that it translates in a plane substantially parallel to breast platform 106 while maintaining a substantially constant distance from platform 106 rather that rotating as a unit with source 100, as in Lorad commercially available systems.



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a side view of a mammography system using the arrangement of FIG. 1. In FIG. 2, x-ray source 100 is at one end 200a of a C-arm 200 that is supported for selective rotation about an axis 202, independently of a support 204 for compression paddle 104 and breast platform 106. Support 204 also selectively rotates about the same axis 202. The other end 200b of C-arm 200 interacts with x-ray receptor 110 through a motion translator schematically illustrated at 206 that translates the rotational motion of the end 200b about axis 202 to a substantially translational motion of receptor 110 that substantially maintains the distance of receptor 110 from breast platform 106 while x-ray data is being taken. FIG. 2 is not to scale, and receptor 110 can be spaced further from member 200b than illustrated, to allow more space for motion translator 206, and also to allow for receptor 110 to be moved selectively further from or closer to breast platform 104 and thus allow for x-ray image magnification. In operation, C-arm 200 and support 204 are rotated to desired angular positions, either manually or by motor drives, patient breast 102 is positioned on platform 106 and is immobilized by bringing paddle 104 toward platform 106 and compressing breast 102, with typically the same or less force than for a typical conventional mammogram, such as between one to one-third the conventional force. With breast 102 immobilized, and with C-arm at a selected angle relative to a normal to platform 106 and receptor 110, such as +15°, imaging starts, and a projection image is taken for each of a number of selected angular positions of source 100 while C-arm 200 rotates, continuously or intermittently, through a selected angle, such as an angle of 30°, is from +15° to −15°. Of course, the motion can be in the opposite direction, from −15° to +15°, or can be over a different angular interval, such as over less than a total of 30°, e.g. 25°, 20°, etc., or more than 30°, such as 35°, 40°, etc. Currently, the preferred range is 115°. A set of image data can be taken at selected angular positions, such as every degree, or every fraction of a degree, or every several degrees of angle. The angular increments between the different positions for sets of image data need not be the same. For example, the increments around 0° can be less than those at the extremes of the angular positions, or vice versa. Currently, the preferred angular increment is 3°. The sets of image data can be taken after an incremental motion from one angular position of source 100 to another, and from one translational position of receptor 110 to another, such that source 100 and receptor 110 are stationary while a set of image data is being taken. Alternatively, one or both of source 100 and receptor 110 can move continuously while sets of image data are being taken, one set for each increment of continuous motion. In the currently preferred embodiment, in the example of continuous motion while taking image data both source 100 and receptor 110 move while image data are being taken.



FIG. 2 also illustrates schematically an electrical/electronic system 208 that interacts with the components discussed above. System 208 includes a control 210 for selectively energizing and otherwise controlling x-ray source 100, an arm rotation control 212 for selectively rotating C-arm 200 and support 204, a breast compression control 214 for selectively moving compression paddle 104 toward and away from breast platform 106, data readout electronics 216 coupled with x-ray receptor 110 to read out the sets of image data at the respective positions of source 100 and receptor 110 relative to immobilized breast 102, and an image reconstruction and display unit 218 coupled with data readout electronics 216 to receive the sets of image data from electronics 216 and to process the image data for reconstruction and other purposes and display images.


For a given position of breast 102, such as a position that is the same or similar to the CC position for a conventional mammogram, source. 100 and receptor 110 can be positioned relative to immobilized breast 102 such that at the 0° position a center ray of the x-ray beam from source 100 would be substantially normal to receptor breast platform 106 and receptor 110. For a first set of image data, source 100 is at +(or −) 15° in a preferred example, and is gradually moved, continuously or intermittently to − (or +) 15°, with a set of image data taken every 3°. The angular range and the increment over which data sets are taken can each be selectively set by the operator, depending of characteristics of the breast being imaged and the screening and diagnostic needs, and can be different for different patients or from one to the other breast of the same patient. For example the source can move through angles that range from a fraction to a degree to several degrees from one imaging position to the next. Each set of image data is supplied by image readout 216 for processing at image reconstruction and display unit 218. Each set of image data can be taken at the same x-ray dose to the breast, and the dose at any one of the different imaging positions can be substantially less than that for a conventional mammogram. The x-ray dose can be substantially the same for each imaging position, but preferably the dose at one of the position, e.g., at or close to the 0° position, is the same or similar to dose for a conventional mammogram while the dose at the each of the other positions is less, preferably much less. Alternatively, the scan can begin with or end with an exposure close to the 0° position at a dose similar to a conventional mammogram, and the rest of the set of image data can be over the angular range with each exposure at an x-ray dose that is substantially less than that for a conventional mammogram. Thus, two types of images can be produced in accordance with the currently preferred embodiment while breast 102 is immobilized in the same position. One type is the same or is at least similar to a conventional mammogram, which can be read and interpreted in the manner familiar to health professionals. The other type is tomosynthetic images reconstructed from the image data and displayed either separately or as an adjunct to the display of the image that is the same or similar to a conventional mammogram. The process described above for one position of breast 102 can be repeated for another position. For example one process can be for a breast position in a manner that is the same or similar to positioning the breast for a conventional CC view, the breast can then be released, the support 204 and C-arm 200 rotated to other angular positions and the breast repositioned in a manner that is the same and similar to the position for an MLO view, and the procedure repeated.



FIG. 3 illustrates schematically a display according to a preferred embodiment, where 300 is a display that is the same or similar to a display for a conventional CC mammogram of two breasts and 302 is a similar display for a conventional MLO view. Another display 304 is close to display 300 and can display any one or more of several types of tomosynthetic images reconstructed from the image data taken at the different imaging positions. For example, if display 300 shows views of a right breast taken at or close to the 0° position in one imaging sequence of a total rotation of source 100 over the ±15° range, display 304 can show, at the option of the user, any one or more of the following views of the right breast: (1) one or more of the projection views taken at the different imaging positions; (2) one or more of several tomosynthetic views of thick slices of the right breast simulating projection views of the right breast taken at the same or similar angle as the view at display 300, with the slices having effective thicknesses selected by the user, such as from several mm to something less than the thickness of the immobilized breast, typically from several mm to about 1 cm; (3) one or more tomosynthetic views of thin slices of the right breast, each simulating a slice through the breast in a respective plane parallel to that of the view at display 300, where each thin slice has an effective thickness of about a mm or less; (4) thin and/or thick slices corresponding to planes that are not parallel to that of the view at display 300; (5) a scrolling image through any of the slices discussed above; and (6) a selected combination of the above displays. A similar display 306 can be associated with display 302, and show a similar selected views related to the images at display 302. FIG. 3 illustrates only one example according to preferred embodiments. Other arrangements also are contemplated, such as different windows on the same display for the different images, differently positioned displays, etc. The user can select the type of images for display, the thickness of a thick slice or a thin slice, the orientation of the slices for display, which slices to display where and in what order, whether to display thick or thin slices as static slides or to scroll through slice images as in movie, etc. Controls 306 can be coupled to each of the displays, and can include manual inputs such as a joystick and/or other known interface devices and a suitably programmed computer to allow a user to control the images that are displayed. For example, the controls can include: (1) selecting one or more areas or volumes of interest at one or more of the displayed images and further processing the image data to form and display additional images of the area or volume of interest (for example, if a lesion is identified that is between tomosynthetic thin slices 32 and 37, the user can manually designate the corresponding area or volume and command the display of the thin slices in that area or volume, and other parameters such as the orientation of the thin slices); (2) identifying the position of an area or region of interest for use in additional procedures such as needle biopsy (for example, the user can designate with a cursor or in some other way a point in or an outline of a suspected lesion in the breast, and the xyz coordinates of the designated point, area, or volume); (3) the user can manually designate the desired thickness, arrangement, and other parameters of slices whose images are to be displayed, to thereby display images of slices that have user-selected thicknesses and other parameters, such as orientation, so that images of slices of different thicknesses and/or orientations can be displayed concurrently; and (4) the user can point to an area of interest in one of the displayed images and the system can automatically display one or more markers at corresponding or at least related locations in one or more of the other images that are being concurrently displayed.


At each imaging position, receptor 100 generates respective digital values for the pixels in a two-dimensional array. In one example, receptor 110 has a rectangular array of approximately 4096 by 3328 pixels, with a pixel size of approximately 70 micrometers in each of the column and row directions. The image data of a set (for a respective imaging position) can be processed either at the full spatial resolution of receptor 110, or at a lower effective spatial resolution, e.g., by binning several original pixel value's into a single, combined pixel value. For example, each set of 2×2 adjacent pixels can be combined into a single respective pixel value, thus achieving an effective spatial resolution of 140 micrometers in each direction. The binning can be in some other combination of original pixels, such as 2×3, and can be done by data readout electronics 216 or image reconstruction and display unit 218 (FIG. 2).


Image reconstruction is done using backprojection in the spatial domain or in the frequency domain as in CT technology but with a novel filter that differs from the ramp filter (in the frequency domain) used in CT reconstruction. See, e.g., G. Lauritsch, et al., A theoretical framework for filtered backprojection in tomosynthesis, SPIE Medical Imaging Conference, Vol. 3338, 1998, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,442,288, both incorporated here by reference. Referring to FIG. 4, the novel filter is represented by graph 400, while a graph 402 represents a conventional CT ramp filter, and a graph 404 represents an all-pass filter. As seen in FIG. 4, the novel filter according to a preferred embodiment rises sharply in amplitude at lower frequencies, between points a and c (in the range indicated at b), as compared with the conventional ramp filter, then levels off at intermediate frequencies to become the same as or close to an all-pass filter between points c and d, and then gradually drops off at higher frequencies. Using the novel filter produces significantly better breast images compared to using a conventional CT technology ramp filter.



FIG. 5 gives a sense of the values of the low, intermediate and high frequencies discussed in connection with FIG. 5. In FIG. 5, the frequency axis is plotted on log scale, and typically is related to spatial resolution of a few mm or more, i.e., it affects mainly to overall impression and flatness of the reconstructed image. With suitable suppression of low frequency content through frequency dependent weights defined by the shape of the novel filter, and gradual suppression of high frequency noise, a tomographic image with good image contrast at all frequency scales can be reconstructed and presented in accordance with a preferred embodiment. Preferably, the filtered backprojection reconstruction of tomographic images is carried out in the frequency domain, using well known processes with the novel filter. However, comparable filtered backprojection can be carried out in the spatial domain, as in known in CT technology, using direct convolution of image data with the spatial domain representation of the filter represented in the frequency domain in FIGS. 4 and 5. In either the frequency domain or in the spatial domain the novel filter can be applier to the image data to generate filtered data for backprojection, or backprojection can be carried out first, followed by a filtering operation. The reconstruction process preferably uses the direct fan-beam backprojection method known in CT technology, but with the novel filter, although it may be possible to use the image data to simulate sets of parallel beam paths for backprojection. The reconstructed thin slice images form a three-dimensional image of the breast, comprising voxel values for respective incremental volumes. These voxel values can then be combined as known in CT technology to synthesize any selected thin slice or thick slice in any selected orientation, and in any selected projection plane.


In a preferred embodiment, while each of all or most of the imaging positions uses lower x-ray dose than that of a conventional mammogram, higher KV can be used as compared with a conventional mammogram in order to boost signal levels from receptor 110 and improve signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios. In addition, preferable an x-ray tube with a Tungsten target is used to further exploit the advantage of higher kVp imaging of the breast, such as between 25 and 50 kVp with different x-ray beam filtration. A small focal spot, of the order of 1 mm or less, is preferred, although a larger focal spot of several mm can be used.


In other preferred embodiments, contrast enhanced breast tomosynthesis can be carried out, by obtaining tomosynthetic images as described above before injecting a contrast agent such as Iodine into the patient, then repeating the process after injection, and subtracting images of the pre-injection and post-injection sets. Another preferred embodiment involves time subtraction tomosynthesis, related to subtracting comparable images obtained at different times. Yet another is dual-energy breast tomosynthesis, whereby two tomosynthetic images at low and high energies are acquired and then subtracted, the two images being acquired through a process such as using successive scans at two different x-ray energy ranges or by alternating x-ray pulses of low and high energy to create the two images. Another other preferred embodiment involves obtaining and displaying both x-ray tomosynthetic images of a breast and ultrasound images of the same breast. Computer aided diagnosis, as known to those skilled in the art and as commercially used currently in the United States, can be applied to selected tomosynthetic images generated as described above.


Fiducial markers are used in preferred embodiments for off-line (without a breast) mechanical positioning and calibration and/or on-line (while imaging a breast with x-rays) image based positioning encoding of moving components. The fiducial markers can be made of a material such as lead or another metal, and can be in the form of points or lines or arrows or crosses, at locations that would be imaged by the x-ray beam at receptor 110 simultaneously with the imaging of a breast 102 but outside the area of the breast image. The fiducial markers are integrated with compression paddle 104, or they can be at or near breast platform 106, or they can be supported separately from paddle 104, for example on a separate member that can be selectively brought into the path of the imaging x-ray beam or taken out of that path, e.g., to take an image that is the same or similar to a conventional mammogram. Different patterns or types of fiducial markers can be provided, for selection by the user. FIG. 6 illustrates an example of arranging fiducial markers 601, 602, 603 and 604 relative to an image of breast 102a on receptor 110, as seen in a top plan view when receptor 110 is horizontal and the fiducial markers are integrated in compression paddle 104.


An alternative embodiment, illustrated schematically in a front view in FIG. 7 and in side view in FIG. 8, is similar to the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 except that receptor 110 is affixed to the end 200b of C-arm 200 that is opposite x-ray source 100. In this embodiment, receptor 110 moves relative to immobilized breast 102 along an arcuate path from one imaging position to another. Because the change in angle between receptor 110 and breast platform is small, it can be disregarded in processing the sets of x-ray image data. Alternatively, a geometric correction known to those skilled in the art can be applied to each set of image data to convert it to interpolated pixel values that would correspond to those that would have been obtained if receptor 110 had been parallel to and at the same distance from platform 106 at all imaging positions. The so corrected sets of image data can then be used in filtered back projections as described above.


In each of the embodiments of FIGS. 1-2 and FIGS. 7-8, antiscatter grid 108 may be selectively retractable, so that the user may take any selected set of x-ray image data with or without using grid 108. As in known in the art, grid 108 can be made to move relative to the x-ray beam during the taking of a set of image data. Similarly, the distance between breast platform 106 and receptor 110 can be selectively changed to effect magnification of the breast image recorded at receptor 110.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: providing an x-ray source configured to move relative to a patient's breast, a flat panel digital x-ray imager, and a breast support and a compression paddle positioned between the x-ray source and the x-ray imager, wherein the compression paddle is configured for compressing the breast against the breast support;compressing the patient's breast between the compression paddle and the breast support;selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit a plurality of first x-rays through the breast to the imager at a plurality of first x-ray doses;controlling the imager to derive from the plurality of first x-rays a set of x-ray images of the breast;receiving a signal identifying an area of interest in the set of x-ray images;identifying a position within the compressed breast of the area of interest;selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit a second x-ray through the breast to the imager at a second x-ray dose, wherein the second x-ray dose is different than each of the plurality of first x-ray doses, and wherein selectively energizing the x-ray source comprises emitting a first number of the plurality of first x-rays, emitting the second x-ray, and emitting a second number of the plurality of first x-rays; andperforming a needle biopsy on the area of interest.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of x-ray images comprise a plurality of tomosynthesis x-ray images.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising controlling the imager to derive from the second x-ray a two-dimensional image of the breast.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the two-dimensional image of the breast is derived from the second x-ray emitted when the x-ray source is at an angle of about +15° to the breast support.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the two-dimensional image of the breast is derived from the second x-ray emitted when the x-ray source is at an angle of about 0° to the breast support.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the two-dimensional image of the breast comprises a plurality of two-dimensional images of the breast.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit the second x-ray is performed prior to performing the needle biopsy.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit the second x-ray is performed prior to selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit the plurality of first x-rays.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving the signal identifying the area of interest in the set of x-ray images comprises receiving a user selection associated with at least one x-ray image of the set of x-ray images.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of first x-ray doses are less than the second x-ray dose.
  • 11. A method comprising: providing an x-ray source, a flat panel digital x-ray imager, a breast support and a compression paddle positioned between the source and the imager, and a motor drive for rotating the x-ray source while performing a tomosynthesis imaging procedure, wherein the compression paddle is configured for compressing a patient's breast against the breast support;compressing the patient's breast between the compression paddle and the breast support;selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit at least one of (1) a plurality of first x-rays through the breast to the imager at a plurality of first x-ray doses, wherein emitting the plurality of first x-rays comprises performing the tomosynthesis imaging procedure, and (2) a second x-ray through the breast to the imager at a second x-ray dose, wherein each of the plurality of first x-ray doses is different than the second x-ray dose, and wherein selectively energizing the x-ray source comprises emitting a first number of the first x-rays, followed by emitting the second x-ray, followed by emitting a second number of the first x-rays;controlling the imager to derive from at least one of the plurality of first x-rays and the second x-ray at least one x-ray image;receiving a signal identifying an area of interest in the compressed breast;identifying a position within the compressed breast of the area of interest; andperforming a needle biopsy on the area of interest.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein selectively energizing the x-ray source comprises emitting the plurality of first x-rays through the breast to the imager at the plurality of first x-ray doses.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein receiving the signal identifying the area of interest in the compressed breast comprises receiving a user input associated with the at least one x-ray image.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising providing an anti-scatter grid and positioning the anti-scatter grid based at least in part on the emission of at least one of the (1) plurality of first x-rays and (2) the second x-ray.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein positioning the anti-scatter grid comprises positioning the anti-scatter grid between the x-ray source and the x-ray imager when emitting the plurality of first x-rays.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein identifying the position within the compressed breast of the area of interest is performed before selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit the first x-ray.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein each of the plurality of first x-ray doses are each less than the second x-ray dose.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein selectively energizing the x-ray source to emit the second x-ray occurs prior to performing the needle biopsy.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/896,828, filed May 17, 2013, entitled “X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY WITH TOMOSYNTHESIS”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,638,994, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/879,807, filed Sep. 10, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,486, filed Nov. 26, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (410)
Number Name Date Kind
3365575 Strax Jan 1968 A
3502878 Stewart Mar 1970 A
3863073 Wagner Jan 1975 A
3971950 Evans et al. Jul 1976 A
4160906 Daniels et al. Jul 1979 A
4310766 Finkenzeller et al. Jan 1982 A
4380086 Vagi Apr 1983 A
4496557 Malen et al. Jan 1985 A
4513433 Weiss et al. Apr 1985 A
4542521 Hahn et al. Sep 1985 A
4559641 Caugant et al. Dec 1985 A
4662379 Macovski May 1987 A
4706269 Reina et al. Nov 1987 A
4721856 Saotome et al. Jan 1988 A
4744099 Huettenrauch et al. May 1988 A
4752948 MacMahon Jun 1988 A
4760589 Siczek Jul 1988 A
4763343 Yanaki Aug 1988 A
4773086 Fujita et al. Sep 1988 A
4773087 Plewes Sep 1988 A
4819258 Kleinman et al. Apr 1989 A
4821727 Levene et al. Apr 1989 A
4901335 Ferlic Feb 1990 A
4969174 Scheid et al. Nov 1990 A
4989227 Tirelli et al. Jan 1991 A
4998270 Scheid et al. Mar 1991 A
5018176 Romeas et al. May 1991 A
RE33634 Yanaki Jul 1991 E
5029193 Saffer Jul 1991 A
5051904 Griffith Sep 1991 A
5078142 Siczek et al. Jan 1992 A
5142557 Toker Aug 1992 A
5163075 Lubinsky et al. Nov 1992 A
5164976 Scheid et al. Nov 1992 A
5199056 Darrah Mar 1993 A
5212637 Saxena May 1993 A
5240011 Assa Aug 1993 A
5256370 Slattery et al. Oct 1993 A
5274690 Burke Dec 1993 A
5289520 Pellegrino et al. Feb 1994 A
5291539 Thumann et al. Mar 1994 A
5313510 Ebersberger May 1994 A
5359637 Webber Oct 1994 A
5365562 Toker Nov 1994 A
5415169 Siczek et al. May 1995 A
5426685 Pellegrino et al. Jun 1995 A
5451789 Wong Sep 1995 A
5452367 Bick et al. Sep 1995 A
5479927 Shmulewitz Jan 1996 A
5483072 Coe Jan 1996 A
5506877 Niklason et al. Apr 1996 A
5526394 Siczek et al. Jun 1996 A
5528658 Hell Jun 1996 A
5539797 Heidsieck et al. Jul 1996 A
5553111 Moore et al. Sep 1996 A
5592562 Rooks Jan 1997 A
5594769 Pellegrino et al. Jan 1997 A
5596200 Sharma et al. Jan 1997 A
5598454 Franetzki et al. Jan 1997 A
5606589 Pellegrino et al. Feb 1997 A
5609152 Pellegrino et al. Mar 1997 A
5627869 Andrew et al. May 1997 A
5657362 Giger et al. Aug 1997 A
5668844 Webber Sep 1997 A
5668889 Hara Sep 1997 A
5706327 Adamkowski et al. Jan 1998 A
5719952 Rooks Feb 1998 A
5735264 Siczek et al. Apr 1998 A
5769086 Ritchart et al. Jun 1998 A
5803912 Siczek et al. Sep 1998 A
5818898 Tsukamoto et al. Oct 1998 A
5828722 Ploetz et al. Oct 1998 A
5841829 Dolazza Nov 1998 A
5844242 Jalink, Jr. Dec 1998 A
5844965 Galkin Dec 1998 A
5864146 Karellas Jan 1999 A
5872828 Niklason Feb 1999 A
5878104 Ploetz Mar 1999 A
5896437 Ploetz Apr 1999 A
5930330 Wolfe Jul 1999 A
5941832 Tumey et al. Aug 1999 A
5970118 Sokolov Oct 1999 A
5983123 Shmulewitz Nov 1999 A
5986662 Argiro et al. Nov 1999 A
5999836 Nelson et al. Dec 1999 A
6005907 Ploetz Dec 1999 A
6022325 Siczek et al. Feb 2000 A
6075879 Roehrig et al. Jun 2000 A
6081577 Webber Jun 2000 A
6091841 Rogers et al. Jul 2000 A
6137527 Abdel-Malek et al. Oct 2000 A
6141398 He et al. Oct 2000 A
6149301 Kautzer et al. Nov 2000 A
6167115 Inoue Dec 2000 A
6175117 Komardin et al. Jan 2001 B1
6196715 Nambu et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207958 Giakos Mar 2001 B1
6216540 Nelson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219059 Argiro Apr 2001 B1
6233473 Shepherd et al. May 2001 B1
6243441 Zur Jun 2001 B1
6244507 Garland Jun 2001 B1
6256369 Lai Jul 2001 B1
6256370 Yavuz Jul 2001 B1
6269176 Barski Jul 2001 B1
6272207 Tang Aug 2001 B1
6282264 Smith Aug 2001 B1
6289235 Webber et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292530 Yavus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292531 Hsieh et al. Sep 2001 B1
6327336 Gingold et al. Dec 2001 B1
6341156 Baetz et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345194 Nelson et al. Feb 2002 B1
6375352 Hewes et al. Apr 2002 B1
6399951 Paulus Jun 2002 B1
6411836 Patel et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415015 Nicolas et al. Jul 2002 B2
6418189 Schafer Jul 2002 B1
6442288 Haerer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6459925 Nields et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463181 Duarte Oct 2002 B2
6480565 Ning Nov 2002 B1
6490476 Townsend et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496557 Wilson Dec 2002 B2
6501819 Unger et al. Dec 2002 B2
6542575 Schubert Apr 2003 B1
6553096 Zhou et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556655 Chichereau et al. Apr 2003 B1
6574304 Hsieh et al. Jun 2003 B1
6574629 Cooke, Jr. et al. Jun 2003 B1
6597762 Ferrant et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611575 Alyassin et al. Aug 2003 B1
6620111 Stephens et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626849 Huitema et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632020 Kaufhold Oct 2003 B2
6633626 Trotter Oct 2003 B2
6633674 Barnes et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638235 Miller et al. Oct 2003 B2
6647092 Eberhard et al. Nov 2003 B2
6674835 Kaufhold Jan 2004 B2
6702459 Barnes et al. Mar 2004 B2
6744848 Stanton et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748044 Sabol et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748046 Thayer Jun 2004 B2
6748047 Gonzalez Jun 2004 B2
6751285 Eberhard et al. Jun 2004 B2
6758824 Miller et al. Jul 2004 B1
6813334 Koppe et al. Nov 2004 B2
6846289 Besson Jan 2005 B2
6882700 Wang et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885724 Li et al. Apr 2005 B2
6895076 Halsmer May 2005 B2
6901132 Eberhard May 2005 B2
6909790 Tumey et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909792 Carrott et al. Jun 2005 B1
6912319 Barnes et al. Jun 2005 B1
6931093 Op De Beek et al. Aug 2005 B2
6940943 Claus et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950492 Besson Sep 2005 B2
6950493 Besson Sep 2005 B2
6957099 Arnone et al. Oct 2005 B1
6960020 Lai Nov 2005 B2
6970531 Eberhard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970586 Baertsch Nov 2005 B2
6978040 Berestov Dec 2005 B2
6987831 Ning Jan 2006 B2
6999554 Mertelmeier Feb 2006 B2
7001071 Deuringer Feb 2006 B2
7016461 Rotondo Mar 2006 B2
7092482 Besson Aug 2006 B2
7110490 Eberhard et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110502 Tsuji Sep 2006 B2
7116749 Besson Oct 2006 B2
7123684 Jing et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127091 Op De Beek et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142633 Eberhard et al. Nov 2006 B2
7190758 Hagiwara Mar 2007 B2
7206462 Betke Apr 2007 B1
7218766 Eberhard May 2007 B2
7244063 Eberhard Jul 2007 B2
7245694 Jing et al. Jul 2007 B2
7263214 Uppaluri Aug 2007 B2
7286645 Freudenberger Oct 2007 B2
7302031 Hjarn et al. Nov 2007 B2
7315607 Ramsauer Jan 2008 B2
7319734 Besson Jan 2008 B2
7319735 Defreitas et al. Jan 2008 B2
7319736 Rotondo Jan 2008 B2
7323692 Rowlands et al. Jan 2008 B2
7331264 Ozawa Feb 2008 B2
7356113 Wu Apr 2008 B2
7430272 Jing et al. Sep 2008 B2
7433507 Jabri Oct 2008 B2
7443949 Defreitas et al. Oct 2008 B2
7577282 Gkanatsios et al. Aug 2009 B2
7583786 Jing et al. Sep 2009 B2
7609806 Defreitas et al. Oct 2009 B2
7609808 Tornai Oct 2009 B2
7616731 Pack Nov 2009 B2
7616801 Gkanatsios et al. Nov 2009 B2
7630531 Chui Dec 2009 B2
7630533 Ruth et al. Dec 2009 B2
7688940 Defreitas et al. Mar 2010 B2
7697660 Ning Apr 2010 B2
7702142 Ren et al. Apr 2010 B2
7760853 Jing et al. Jul 2010 B2
7760924 Ruth et al. Jul 2010 B2
7792245 Hitzke et al. Sep 2010 B2
7831296 Defreitas et al. Nov 2010 B2
7839979 Hauttmann Nov 2010 B2
7869563 Defreitas et al. Jan 2011 B2
7869862 Seppi Jan 2011 B2
7881428 Jing et al. Feb 2011 B2
7885384 Mannar Feb 2011 B2
7894646 Shirahata et al. Feb 2011 B2
7916915 Gkanatsios et al. Mar 2011 B2
7949091 Jing et al. May 2011 B2
7986765 Defreitas et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991106 Ren et al. Aug 2011 B2
8031834 Ludwig Oct 2011 B2
8131049 Ruth et al. Mar 2012 B2
8155421 Ren et al. Apr 2012 B2
8170320 Smith et al. May 2012 B2
8175219 Defreitas et al. May 2012 B2
8285020 Gkanatsios et al. Oct 2012 B2
8416915 Jing et al. Apr 2013 B2
8452379 DeFreitas et al. May 2013 B2
8457282 Baorui et al. Jun 2013 B2
8515005 Ren et al. Aug 2013 B2
8559595 Defreitas et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565372 Stein et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565374 DeFreitas et al. Oct 2013 B2
8565860 Kimchy Oct 2013 B2
8571289 Ruth et al. Oct 2013 B2
8712127 Ren et al. Apr 2014 B2
8767911 Ren et al. Jul 2014 B2
8787522 Smith et al. Jul 2014 B2
8831171 Jing et al. Sep 2014 B2
8853635 O'Connor Oct 2014 B2
8873716 Ren et al. Oct 2014 B2
9042612 Gkanatsios et al. May 2015 B2
9226721 Ren et al. Jan 2016 B2
9502148 Ren Nov 2016 B2
9895115 Ren Feb 2018 B2
10719223 Gkanatsios Jul 2020 B2
20010038681 Stanton et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020012450 Tsujii Jan 2002 A1
20020048343 Launay et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020050986 Inouc et al. May 2002 A1
20020070970 Wood et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020075997 Unger et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020090055 Zur et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020094062 Dolazza Jul 2002 A1
20020122533 Marie et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020126798 Harris Sep 2002 A1
20030007598 Wang et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030010923 Zur Jan 2003 A1
20030018272 Treado et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030026386 Tang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030058989 Rotondo Mar 2003 A1
20030072409 Kaufhold et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072417 Kaufhold et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073895 Nields et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030095624 Eberhard et al. May 2003 A1
20030097055 Yanof et al. May 2003 A1
20030149364 Kapur Aug 2003 A1
20030169847 Karellas et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030194050 Eberhard Oct 2003 A1
20030194051 Wang et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194121 Eberhard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030210254 Doan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212327 Wang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030215120 Uppaluri et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040008809 Webber Jan 2004 A1
20040066882 Eberhard et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040066884 Hermann Claus et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040066904 Eberhard et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040070582 Smith et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040094167 Brady et al. May 2004 A1
20040101095 Jing et al. May 2004 A1
20040109529 Eberhard et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040146221 Siegel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040171986 Tremaglio, Jr. et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040190682 Deuringer Sep 2004 A1
20040213378 Zhou et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040247081 Halsmer Dec 2004 A1
20040264627 Besson Dec 2004 A1
20040267157 Miller et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050025278 Hagiwara Feb 2005 A1
20050049521 Miller et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063509 DeFreitas et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050078797 Danielsson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050089205 Kapur Apr 2005 A1
20050105679 Wu et al. May 2005 A1
20050113681 DeFreitas et al. May 2005 A1
20050113715 Schwindt et al. May 2005 A1
20050117694 Francke Jun 2005 A1
20050129172 Mertelmeier Jun 2005 A1
20050133706 Eberhard Jun 2005 A1
20050135555 Claus et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135664 Kaufhold et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050226375 Eberhard et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050248347 Damadian Nov 2005 A1
20060009693 Hanover et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030784 Miller et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060034426 Freudenberger Feb 2006 A1
20060074288 Kelly Apr 2006 A1
20060098855 Gkanatsios et al. May 2006 A1
20060109951 Popescu May 2006 A1
20060126780 Rotondo Jun 2006 A1
20060129062 Nicoson et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155209 Miller et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060210016 Francke Sep 2006 A1
20060262898 Partain Nov 2006 A1
20060269041 Mertelmeier Nov 2006 A1
20060291618 Eberhard et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070030949 Jing et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036265 Jing et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070076844 Defreitas et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070078335 Horn Apr 2007 A1
20070140419 Souchay Jun 2007 A1
20070223651 Wagenaar et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225600 Weibrecht et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070242800 Jing et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080019581 Gkanatsios et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080045833 Defreitas et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080056436 Pack Mar 2008 A1
20080101537 Sendai May 2008 A1
20080112534 Defreitas et al. May 2008 A1
20080118023 Besson May 2008 A1
20080130979 Ren et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080212861 Durgan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080285712 Kopans Nov 2008 A1
20080317196 Lmai Dec 2008 A1
20090003519 Defreitas et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010384 Jing et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090080594 Brooks et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080602 Brooks et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090135997 Defreitas et al. May 2009 A1
20090141859 Gkanatsios et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090213987 Stein et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090237924 Ladewig Sep 2009 A1
20090238424 Arakita et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090268865 Ren et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090296882 Gkanatsios et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090304147 Jing et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100020937 Hautmann Jan 2010 A1
20100020938 Koch Jan 2010 A1
20100034450 Mertelmeier Feb 2010 A1
20100054400 Ren Mar 2010 A1
20100086188 Ruth Apr 2010 A1
20100091940 Ludwig et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100150306 Defreitas et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100189227 Mannar Jul 2010 A1
20100195882 Ren Aug 2010 A1
20100226475 Smith Sep 2010 A1
20100290585 Eliasson Nov 2010 A1
20100303202 Ren Dec 2010 A1
20100313196 De Atley et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110026667 Poorter Feb 2011 A1
20110069809 Defreitas et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110178389 Kumar et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110188624 Ren Aug 2011 A1
20110234630 Batman et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110268246 Dafni Nov 2011 A1
20120033868 Ren Feb 2012 A1
20120051502 Ohta et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120236987 Ruimi Sep 2012 A1
20120238870 Smith et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130028374 Gkanatsios et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130211261 Wang Aug 2013 A1
20130272494 DeFreitas et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140044230 Stein et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140044231 Defreitas et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140086471 Ruth et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140098935 Defreitas et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140232752 Ren et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140314198 Ren et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140321607 Smith Oct 2014 A1
20140376690 Jing et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150049859 DeFreitas et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150160848 Gkanatsios et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150310611 Gkanatsios et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160106383 Ren et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160189376 Bernard Jun 2016 A1
20160209995 Jeon Jul 2016 A1
20160220207 Jouhikainen Aug 2016 A1
20160256125 Smith Sep 2016 A1
20160270742 Stein et al. Sep 2016 A9
20160302746 Erhard Oct 2016 A1
20160331339 Guo Nov 2016 A1
20170024113 Gkanatsios et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032546 Westerhoff Feb 2017 A1
20170071562 Suzuki Mar 2017 A1
20170128028 DeFreitas et al. May 2017 A1
20170135650 Stein et al. May 2017 A1
20170316588 Homann Nov 2017 A1
20170319167 Goto Nov 2017 A1
20180130201 Bernard May 2018 A1
20180177476 Jing et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180188937 Gkanatsios et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180289347 DeFreitas et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190059830 Williams Feb 2019 A1
20190095087 Gkanatsios Mar 2019 A1
20190200942 DeFreitas Jul 2019 A1
20190336794 Li Nov 2019 A1
20190388051 Morita Dec 2019 A1
20200029927 Wilson Jan 2020 A1
20200352531 Smith Nov 2020 A1
20210128087 DeFreitas May 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (48)
Number Date Country
102222594 Oct 2011 CN
4104166 Aug 1992 DE
102004051401 May 2006 DE
102004051820 May 2006 DE
102010027871 Oct 2011 DE
0775467 May 1997 EP
0982001 Mar 2000 EP
1028451 Aug 2000 EP
1428473 Jun 2004 EP
1759637 Mar 2007 EP
1569556 Apr 2012 EP
2732764 May 2014 EP
2602743 Nov 2014 EP
2819145 Dec 2014 EP
3143935 Mar 2017 EP
53151381 Nov 1978 JP
2001-346786 Dec 2001 JP
2002219124 Aug 2002 JP
2006-231054 Sep 2006 JP
2007-50264 Mar 2007 JP
2007-521911 Aug 2007 JP
2007229269 Sep 2007 JP
2008-67933 Mar 2008 JP
200886471 Apr 2008 JP
2009500048 Jan 2009 JP
2012-509714 Apr 2012 JP
2012-511988 May 2012 JP
2015-530706 Oct 2015 JP
WO 9005485 May 1990 WO
WO 9803115 Jan 1998 WO
WO 9816903 Apr 1998 WO
WO 0051484 Sep 2000 WO
WO 2000068863 Nov 2000 WO
WO 03020114 Mar 2003 WO
03037046 May 2003 WO
WO 2003057564 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2004043535 May 2004 WO
WO 2005051197 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005110230 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005112767 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006055830 May 2006 WO
WO 2006058160 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007129244 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008072144 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2009122328 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009136349 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2010070554 Jun 2010 WO
WO 2013184213 Dec 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (103)
Entry
Niklason, Loren T., Bradley T. Christian, Laura E. Niklason, Daniel B. Kopans, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Donald E. Castleberry, Beale H. Opsahl-Ong, Cynthia E. Landberg, and Brian Giambattista. “Digital breast tomosynthesis: potentially a new method for breast cancer screening.” In Digital Mammography (Year: 1998).
Thurfjell, E. “Mammography screening: one versus two views and independent double reading.” Acta Radiologica 35, No. 4 (1994): 345-350.
Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, Public Version, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C, Inv. No. 337-Ta-1063, in the matter of Certain X-Ray Breast Imaging Devices and Components Thereof, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 299 pages.
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in case IPR2018-00651 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296 B2) , in the matter of Fujifilm Corporation, Fujfilm Medical Systems USA, and Fujifilm Techno Products Co., Ltd. (Petitioner) v. Hologic, Inc., (Patent Owner), dated Aug. 21, 2018, 21 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of the U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296, Fujifilm Corp. et al. v. Hologic Inc., 85 pages.
Corrected Petition for Inter Partes Review of the U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296, Fujifilm Corp. et al. v. Hologic Inc., 85 pages.
Ex. 1001 Declaration of Dr. John Allison, 169 pages.
Ex. 1002 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. John Allison, 7 pages.
Ex. 1003 U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296 (“The '296 Patent”), 13 pages.
Ex. 1004 Patent File History for the '296 Patent, 379 pages.
Ex. 1005 U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684 (“The '684 Patent”), 11 pages.
Ex. 1006 U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,828 to Loren T. Niklason et al. (“Niklason”), 14 pages.
Ex. 1007 Development and Clinical Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Digital Mammography by Daniel B. Kopans, M.D. (“Kopans”), 91 pages.
Ex. 1008 Tomosynthesis Breast Imaging: Early Detection and Characterization of Breast Cancer by Leena M. Hamberg, PhD (“Hamberg”), 20 pages.
Ex. 1009 U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0090055 naming Albert Zur, et al. as inventors (“Zur”), 11 pages.
Ex. 1010 U.S. Pat. No. 4,613,982 to Dornheim, et al. (“Dornheim”), 4 pages.
Ex. 1011 U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,020 to Kaufhold, et al. (“Kaufhold”), 15 pages.
Ex. 1012 E-mail dated Nov. 1, 2017 from Carol E. Jacobsen, Chief, Customer Support Division, Directorate of User Services, Defense Technical Information Center, 2 pages.
Ex. 1013 Archived copies of public webpages, dated Aug. 2000, on the Defense Technical Information Center's website obtained from the Internet Archive, 8 pages.
Ex. 1014 Archived copies of public webpages, dated Aug. 2000, on the website of National Technical Information Services (“NTIS”) obtained from the Internet Archive, 15 pages.
Ex. 1015 Affidavit of Christopher Butler, Office Manager of the Internet Archive, dated Dec. 28, 2017, 2 pages.
Ex. 1016 Print out of web page showing search results for Kopans in the NTIS collection, 2 pages.
Ex. 1017 U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379 (the “'379 Patent”), 12 pages.
Ex. 1018 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM and Boone JM, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002 (excerpts), 23 pages.
Ex. 1019 “Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications” by S.L. Lou et al. published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2000; 24:205-220 (“Lou”), 16 pages.
Ex. 1020 Instrumentarium Imaging, “Diamond Breast Care,” copyright 2003, 20 pages.
Ex. 1021 “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging,” Loren T. Niklason, PhD, et al., Radiology 1997; 205:399-406 (“Niklason”), 8 pages.
Ex. 1022 Dobbins, J.T., Godfrey, D.J., “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: Current state of the art and clinical potential,” Phys. Med. Biol. 2003 vol. 48:R65-R106, 42 pages.
Ex. 1023 Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H08-186762 identifying Shinichi Yamada and Seiichiro Nagai as inventors (“Yamada”), 41 pages.
Ex. 1024 Certified translation of Yamada, 42 pages.
Ex. 1025 U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,285 to Jeffrey Wayne Eberhard (“Eberhard”), 11 pages.
Ex. 1026 U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,575 to Abdalmajeid Musa Alyassin, et al. (“Alyassin”), 12 pages.
Ex. 1027 S. Vedantham et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art,” Radiology 277(3), 663-684, 22 pages.
Ex. 1028 Ingrid Reiser & Stephen Glick, Tomosynthesis Imaging (2014) (excerpts), 8 pages.
Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,521 to Hahn, et al. (“Hahn”), 4 pages.
Ex. 1030 U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,218 to Matsumoto (“Matsumoto”), 26 pages.
Ex. 1031 Japanese Utility Model Patent Publication No. S58-16640, identifying Shigekazu Hara et al. as inventors (“Hara”), 10 pages.
Ex. 1032 Certified translation of Hara, 11 pages.
Ex. 1033 Declaration of Frances Cheever, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 3 pages.
Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review in case IPR2018-00672 (Patent 8,452,379 B2), in the matter of Fujifilm Corporation, Fujfilm Medical Systems USA, and Fujifilm Techno Products Co., Ltd. (Petitioner) v. Hologic, Inc., (Patent Owner), dated Sep. 4, 2018, 17 pages.
Decision Denying inter Partes Review in case IPR2018-00538 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684 B2), in the matter of Fujifilm Corporation, (Petitioner) v. Hologic, Inc., (Patent Owner), dated Jul. 27, 2018, 31 pages.
Kachelriess, Marc et al., “Flying Focal Spot (FFS) in Cone-Beam CT”, 2004 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Oct. 16-22, 2004, Rome Italy, vol. 6, pp. 3759-3763.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of the U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379, Fujifilm Corp. et al. v. Hologic Inc., 88 pages.
Ex. 1001 Declaration of Dr. John Allison, 168 pages.
Ex. 1003 U.S. Pat. No. 8,452,379 (the '379 Patent), 13 pages.
Ex. 1004 Patent File History for the '379 Patent, 265 pages.
Ex. 1006 U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,828 to Loren T. Niklason et al. (“Niklason”) Ex. 1007 Development and Clinical Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Digital Mammography by Daniel B. Kopans, M.D. (“Kopans”), 14 pages.
Ex. 1011 Patent File History for U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296, 379 pages.
Ex. 1014 Archived copies of public webpages, dated Aug. 2000, on the website of National Technical Information Services (“NTIS”) obtained from the Internet Archive, 14 pages.
Ex. 1016 Print out of web page showing search results for Kopans and Hamberg in the NTIS collection, 2 pages.
Ex. 1017 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM and Boone JM, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002 (excerpts), 23 pages.
Ex. 1018 “Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications” by S.L. Lou et al. published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2000; 24:205-220 (“Lou”), 16 pages.
Ex. 1019 Instrumentarium Imaging, “Diamond Breast Care,” copyright 2003, 20 pages.
Ex. 1020 “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging,” Loren T. Niklason, PhD, et al., Radiology 1997; 205:399-406 (“Niklason”), 8 pages.
Ex. 1021 Dobbins, J.T., Godfrey, D.J., “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: Current state of the art and clinical potential,” Phys. Med. Biol. 2003 vol. 48:R65-R106, 42 pages.
Ex. 1022 Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H08-186762 identifying Shinichi Yamada and Seiichiro Nagai as inventors (“Yamada”), 41 pages.
Ex. 1023 Certified translation of Yamada, 42 pages.
Ex. 1024 U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,285 to Jeffrey Wayne Eberhard (“Eberhard”), 11 pages.
Ex. 1025 U.S. Pat. No. 6,611,575 to Abdalmajeid Musa Alyassin, et al. (“Alyassin”), 12 pages.
Ex. 1026 S. Vedantham et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art,” Radiology 277(3), 663-684, 22 pages.
Ex. 1027 Ingrid Reiser & Stephen Glick, Tomosynthesis Imaging (2014) (excerpts), 8 pages.
Ex. 1028 U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,521 to Hahn, et al. (“Hahn”), 4 pages.
Ex. 1029 U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,218 to Matsumoto (“Matsumoto”), 26 pages.
Ex. 1030 Japanese Utility Model Patent Publication No. S58-16640, identifying Shigekazu Hara et al. as inventors (“Hara”), 10 pages.
Ex. 1031 Certified translation of Hara, 11 pages.
Ex. 1032 Declaration of Frances Cheever, dated Feb. 14, 2018, 3 pages.
“Essentials for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography system”, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-EN-US, 2006, 12 pgs.
“Filtered Back Projection,” (Nygren) published May 8, 2007; URL:http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/-.about.e1e0539/Projects97/cult/node2.html., 2 pgs.
“Lorad Selenia” Document B-BI-SEO US/Intl (May 2006) copyright Hologic 2006, 12 pgs.
Acrin website, located at https://www.acrin.org/PATIENTS/ABOUTIMAGINGEXAMSANDAGENTS/ABOUTMAMMOGRAPHYANDTOMOSYNTHESIS.aspx, “About Mammography and Tomosnythesis”, obtained online on Dec. 8, 2015, 5 pgs.
American College of Radiology website, located at http://www.acr.org/FAQs/DBT-FAQ, “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis FAQ for Insurers”, obtained online on Dec. 8, 2015, 2 pages.
Arfelli, F. et al., “Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques”, Apr. 2000, retrieved at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751500, 8 pages.
Aslund, Magnus, “Digital Mammography with a Photon Counting Detector in a Scanned Multislit Geometry”, Doctoral Thesis, Dept of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, Apr. 2007, 51 pages.
Boone, J. et al., “Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation”, Dec. 31, 2001, retrieved at: http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.2213010334,11 pages.
Chan, Heang-Ping et al., “ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005, 7 pgs.
Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Scale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005.
Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98-5493, Nov. 1998, 8 pgs.
Dobbins, James T., “Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Taylor and Francis LTD, London GB, vol. 48, No. 19, Oct. 7, 2003, 42 pages.
Federica Pediconi et al., “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of a new software for MR-based breast imaging”, International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086.
Grant, David G., “Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional imaging technique”, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, vol. BME-19, #1, Jan. 1972, pp. 20-28.
Hamberg, Leena M., “Tomosynthesis breast imaging: early detection and characterization of breast cancer”, prepared by Massachusetts General Hospital for the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command Fort Detrick, Maryland, Jul. 2000, 20 pages.
Japanese Office Action mailed in Application 2016-087710, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 5 pages.
Japanese Office Action mailed in Application 2017-001579, dated Mar. 29, 2017, 1 page. (No English Translation.).
Kapur, Ajay et al., “Combination of Digital Mammography with Semiautomated 3D Breast Ultrasound”, Aug. 1, 2004, retrieved at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/153303460400300402, 10 pages.
Kita et al., “Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using simulation of breast deformation”, Proceedings 1998 IEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA, Jun. 23-25, 1998, pp. 700-707.
Kopans, D., “Development and Clinical Evaluation of Tomosynthesis for Digital Mammography”, Oct. 31, 2000, retrieved at: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA387722, 91 pages.
Kopans, Daniel B., “Breast Imaging”, Chapter 26: Future Advances in Breast Imaging, 2nd Edition, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1998, 37 pages.
Lehmann, V. et al., “MEMS techniques applied to the fabrication of anti-scatter grids for X-ray imaging”, 2002, retrieved at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/S_Ronnebeck/publication/222546207_MEMS_techniques_applied_to_the_fabrication_of anti-scatter_grids_for_Xray_imaging/links/5570136f08aeccd777417301/MEMS-techniques-applied-to-the-fabrication-of-anti-scatter-grids-for-X-ray-imaging.pdf, 6 pages.
Mammographic Accreditation Phantom, http://www.cirsinc.com/pdfs/015cp.pdf. (2006), 2 pgs.
Niklason et al., “Digital Breast Imaging: Tomosynthesis and Digital Subtraction Mammography”, Breast Disease, vol. 10, No. 3-4, pp. 151-164, 1998.
Niklason, Loren T. et al., “Digital Tomosynthesis in Breast Imaging”, Radiology, Nov. 1997, vol. 205, No. 2, pp. 399-406.
Nykanen, Kirsi et al., “X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography”, Jul. 2003, retrieved at: http://www.siltanen-research.net/publ/NykanenSiltanen2003.pdf, 10 pages.
Pisano, Etta D., “Digital Mammography”, Radiology, vol. 234, No. 2, Feb. 2005, pp. 353-362.
Senographe 700 & 800T (GE); 2-page download on Jun. 22, 2006 from www.gehealthcare.com/inen/rad/whe/products/mswh800t.html.; Figures 1-7 on 4 sheets re lateral shift compression paddle, 2 pgs.
Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008, 8 pgs.
Smith, Andrew, PhD, “Full Field Breast Tomosynthesis”, Hologic White Paper, Oct. 2004, 6 pgs.
Suryanarayanan, S. et al., “Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography”, Dec. 31, 2000, retrieved at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633200800616, 13 pages.
Suryanarayanan, S. et al., “Evaluation of Linear and Nonlinear Tomosynthetic Reconstruction Methods in Digital Mammography”, Mar. 2001, retrieved at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633203805305, 6 pages.
Webber, Richard, “A controlled evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography applied to digital spot mammography”, Feb. 2000, retrieved at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3453191/, 8 pages.
Wheeler F. W., et al. “Micro-Calcification Detection in Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, Conf—Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Dec. 11, 2001 to Dec. 15, 2001, Delhi, SPIE, US, vol. 6144, Feb. 13, 2006, 12 pgs.
Wu, T. et al., “A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis”, Aug. 26, 2004, retrieved at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1118/1.1786692/full.
Wu, Tao, et al. “Tomographic Mammography Using a Limited Number of Low-Dose Cone-Beam Projection Images” Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, vol. 30, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2003, p. 365-380.
Japanese Notice of Rejection in Application 2018-554775, dated Feb. 22, 2021, 10 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180344276 A1 Dec 2018 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10723486 Nov 2003 US
Child 12879807 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13896828 May 2013 US
Child 16004151 US
Parent 12879807 Sep 2010 US
Child 13896828 US