The present invention concerns an x-ray radiator of the type having an anode contained in a housing and an arrangement for determining the position of the x-ray-emitting focal spot on the anode.
X-ray radiators of the above general type are known in the art. An x-ray beam strikes, for example, a radially outlying region of a rotating anode plate. To produce precise x-ray images, it is necessary for the focal spot formed by the deceleration of the electrons striking the anode plate to maintain an exact position. As a result of different causes, the position of the focal spot may change. An electron beam directed toward the anode plate can be adjusted by magnetic devices to correct the position of the focal spot. For this purpose, spatially resolved x-ray sensors, with which the intensity of a ray beam emitted by the x-ray radiator can be measured at the edge, are mounted outside of a housing of the x-ray radiator for determination of the position of the focal spot. A conclusion is indirectly made about the position of the focal spot as a result of this measurement, and if necessary the position can be corrected by the magnetic devices.
Rotary piston radiators also are known in the art. An anode that is fashioned rotationally-symmetric is a component of a piston that is mounted such that it can rotate. The rotary piston rotates around its axis in a liquid coolant. An electron beam emanating from the cathode is deflected by magnetic devices such that it strikes a predetermined focal spot on the anode. The rotary piston radiator is surrounded by a housing that is essentially impermeable to x-ray radiation. Only a window is provided for allowing the x-ray radiation to exit. The measurement of the position of the focal spot also ensues indirectly with rotary piston radiators, meaning by means of sensors mounted outside of the housing. The position of the focal spot cannot be particularly precisely determined in this manner, as with x-ray radiators with rotary anodes.
An object of the present invention is to provide an x-ray radiator that avoids the disadvantages according to the prior art. In particular an x-ray radiator should be specified in which the position of the focal spot can be optimally precisely determined.
The object is achieved according to the invention in an x-ray radiator that has a collimator aligned toward the focal spot that serves to determine the position of the focal spot. Departing from prior art, the determination of the position of the focal spot does not ensue outside of the housing by a measurement of the intensity in the edge region of the ray beam. Instead, the position of the focal spot is determined directly using a collimator directed toward said focal spot. This enables a particularly exact determination of the position of the focal spot. The focal spot can be set to a predetermined desired position with a precision of 1 μm. The measurement of the position of the focal spot can ensue continuously or at predetermined points in time. It is henceforth also possible to determine the quality of the focal spot (for example its homogeneity), from the curve of the intensity decrease at its edges or a profile of the intensity distribution. With the invention, the potential of damage to the x-ray radiator as a consequence of false positioning of the focal spot can be detected and, if applicable, prevented early.
The housing is appropriately manufactured from a material that is essentially impermeable to x-rays, preferably from lead or tungsten. The device is appropriately fastened to the housing. It is thus a component of the x-ray radiator. Given an exchange of the x-ray radiator, position detecting adjustment of the device to the replaced x-ray radiator as is necessary in the prior art, is not needed. If only the x-ray tube is exchanged, the inventive device remains in the housing. The adjustment of the replaced x-ray tube can ensue in a simple manner with the inventive position detecting device. No further measurement or calibration means need to be provided separately for adjustment to the system, or need to be carried by a service technician for this purpose.
In an embodiment, the device is mounted on a cover that includes a beam exit window. The cover is connected with the housing such that it can be detached. This enables an easy exchange of the device in the case of a defect.
In a further embodiment, the entrance window of the collimator is disposed within the housing. It is thus possible to increase the focal spot at a reduced distance to be monitored and to increase the precision of the adjustment.
It has proven to be advantageous to fashion the collimator in the form of a tube having an axis directed toward a desired position of the fixed-disk storage on the anode. The ratio of the diameter D to the length L of the tube can thereby be smaller than 0.1, preferably smaller than 0.05. The diameter D is advantageously in the range of 30 μm to 2000 μm, preferably 100 μm to 300 μm. A collimator defined by the aforementioned parameters is suited for a particularly exact determination of the position of the focal spot. It can be determined with a precision of approximately 1 μm. Aside from this, with such a collimator it is possible to particularly precisely determine the geometry and the intensity distribution in the area of the focal spot.
The collimator can be produced from a material that is essentially impermeable to x-rays, preferably from lead or tungsten. A detector to measure the x-ray intensity can be provided at the end of the collimator opposite from the entrance window. The detector can be formed by a scintillator and a photodiode downstream in the beam path. It can be accommodated in a measurement housing that is essentially impermeable to x-rays except for an input opening. Such a device for determination of the position of the focal spot can be designed simply it can be produced in a compact, space-saving manner and, in such an embodiment, be disposed within the housing. By disposing the detector in a measurement housing that is essentially impermeable to x-rays, penetration of unwanted interfering radiation is prevented.
According to a further embodiment, the position determining device is a component of a system for deflection of the electron beam that generates the focal spot. For deflection, a regulation device can be provided to adjust and/or to hold the desired position on the anode. In this case the device for determination of the position of the focal spot is a component of the regulation device.
The position of the focal spot can be changed in steps or continuously along a predetermined path by the regulation device. The path can be a wandering or spiral-shaped path. By the change of the position of the focal spot, it is possible to move the focal spot without the device having to be moved. The geometry of the focal spot and/or an intensity distribution in the area thus can be determined.
The present invention is particularly suited for x-ray radiators in which the anode is accommodated in the housing such that it can rotate, for example rotary anode radiators or rotary piston radiators.
a and 5b the course of two paths for movement of the focal spot.
A rotary piston radiator 2 that is mounted such that it can rotate around an axis A is disposed in a housing 1 in
A measurement device generally designated with reference numeral 6 is mounted fixed on the housing 1. It includes a collimator tube 7 having a collimator axis KA directed toward a focal spot 9 formed by the electron beam 8 on the anode 3. A scintillator 11 as well as a photodiode 12 downstream in the beam path are mounted at an end of the collimator tube 7 opposite from an entrance window 10. The measurement device 6 has a cable feedthrough 13.
As can be seen from
D/L=tan α=(T/2)/(AB+L/2)
From this it is clear that the detectable second diameter T on the anode 3 is smaller with decreasing size of the ratio D/L, and thus the measurement precision of the device 6 is greater. It has proven to be particularly advantageous to select the diameter D in the range of 100 μ to 300 μ.
a and 5b show two alternatives in which the focal spot 9 on the anode 3 can be moved by means of the deflection devices 18 and magnet devices 19. Such a movement of the focal spot 9 enables its geometry and intensity distribution radiated from the focal spot 9 to be determined by the measurement device 6. In this manner, the focal spot 9 can be held particularly exactly in a predetermined desired position. It is naturally also possible to move the focal spot 9 by means of the deflection devices 18 and magnet devices 19 in different ways from those shown in
Using the results shown in the example in
However, with the proposed x-ray device it is also possible to detect potential damage to the anode 3 early and to transmit to the user an instruction for a necessary exchange of the x-ray radiator. Damage thus can be detected and corrected in an early stage. Consequent damages as well as an unforeseen failure of the x-ray device can be prevented as a consequence.
The geometry of the focal spot 9 also can be influenced and adjusted by a suitable activation of the magnet device 19. Conclusions about the edge steepness of an intensity decrease at the edges of the focal spot 9 are also possible.
Regulation of the position of the focal spot 9 solely on the basis of a relative signal evaluation is possible with the disclosed measurement device 6. It is not necessary to measure an absolute signal strength. As a result, elaborate and expensive calibration of the measurement device 6 can be foregone. For moving the focal spot 9, the deflection device 18 can be operated such that the position of the focal spot 9 is changed continuously or in steps according to the paths shown in
Although modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventors to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 025 119 | May 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3859534 | Loughlin | Jan 1975 | A |
4472827 | Gabbay et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4675892 | Plessis et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
5033074 | Cotter et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5065420 | Levene | Nov 1991 | A |
5550886 | Dobbs et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550889 | Gard et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5657364 | Pfoh | Aug 1997 | A |
5684855 | Aradate et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689541 | Schardt | Nov 1997 | A |
5828727 | Schild | Oct 1998 | A |
5867553 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6056437 | Toth | May 2000 | A |
6094469 | Dobbs et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6215844 | Adachi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256364 | Toth et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6370218 | Toth et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411672 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6652143 | Popescu | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6707876 | Tanigawa | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7001071 | Deuringer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7072439 | Radley et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20050129175 | Shen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060039527 | Malamud | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060093092 | Kuhn | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
36 32 811 | Apr 1987 | DE |
196 11 228 | Oct 1997 | DE |
198 32 972 | Jan 2000 | DE |
40 23 490 | Jul 2001 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050265521 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |