The present specification relates to X-ray inspection systems. More particularly, the present specification relates to a source, detector and object configuration, whereby the energy transmitted through the object being inspected is measured at improved energy resolutions.
Due to persistent security threats and the possibility of terrorist activities, there is a need for deploying high speed, high resolution, and accurate screening devices at places that are likely targets of such activities. In addition, there exists a requirement for screening of baggage and other items for explosives, contraband and other illicit materials. This requires a screening system which is capable of discriminating between different materials based on one or more unique features of each material such as effective atomic number, chemical structure, physical density, among other variables.
Cabinet X-ray scanners are capable of performing automated threat detection on articles of baggage and divested items by calculating physical properties of objects from the two-dimensional image generated. For example, material density can be estimated from at least two co-planar projection views. Z-effective can be estimated from at least two overlapping projection views acquired at different energy levels. Thus, increasing the number of views or number of energy levels permits for more precise estimations of physical properties such as material density and Z-effective.
Conventional cabinet X-ray systems have a limited number of co-planar views. It is highly desirable for commercial reasons to have as few views as necessary. Typically, a planar X-ray view consists of an X-ray generator and a linear array of X-ray detectors, which constitutes a majority of the component costs in an X-ray scanner. Each additional view increases the component cost of the scanner in an incremental manner. Thus, two views would imply twice the cost of a single view, three views would increase the cost three times, and so forth. Therefore, achieving desired imaging or automated detection performance with the fewest number of views allows the lowest component cost. Increasing performance through other means, such as higher performance detectors, becomes desirable because of the potential lower increase in component cost.
Further, increasing energy discrimination also has a detrimental impact on component cost. Commercially available X-ray detectors currently permit up to 128 channels of energy discrimination. Populating a multiple or even a single projection X-ray detector array with energy discriminating detectors is commercially prohibitive. The cost of energy discriminating detectors is significantly higher than conventional dual-energy detector arrays. For example, a conventional single-view X-ray scanner equipped with energy discriminating detectors would incur a three-fold increase in component cost. Reducing the number of energy discriminating detectors employed to increase performance becomes an attractive option, especially if the incremental increase in component cost is less than doubling the cost of the machine, i.e. less than the cost of adding a second view.
For an application such as liquids screening, it is desirable to have the full range of energy information permitting for a spectroscopic analysis of the contents in the divested container. Therefore, some applications present the opportunity to restrict the concept of operations such that only a portion of the projection view needs to be populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors in order to obtain improved estimation of the physical properties necessary for effective threat detection. For example, with respect to the divestiture of liquid containers at an aviation security checkpoint for separate threat detection analysis, only a portion of a bin or container need be screened using multi-energy discriminating detectors.
Thus, what is needed is an X-ray scanner, having at least a single-view, with limited energy discriminating detector coverage that can meet or exceed the automated detection performance of a dual-view X-ray scanner and still have a lower component cost, thus achieving the trade-off between cost and performance.
Accordingly, there is a need for an X-ray system that has an overall improved energy resolution to discriminate and therefore detect certain materials of interest.
In one embodiment, the present specification describes a system for screening objects, comprising: a) a receptacle for holding an object; b) a conveyor to move the receptacle through an inspection region; c) first X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object; d) a second X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object; e) a first set and a second set of transmission detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object; and f) a third and a fourth set of energy discriminating detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object, wherein said third and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.
In one embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating an X-ray projection view of the said object using an X-ray source; d) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using transmission detectors and at least one energy discriminating detector which is positioned such that it aligns with the object within the receptacle.
In one embodiment, the present specification describes a system for screening objects, comprising: a) a receptacle for holding an object; b) a conveyor to move the receptacle through an inspection region; c) an X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating an X-ray projection view of the said object; d) a plurality of transmission detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object; and e) a plurality of energy discriminating detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object, wherein said plurality of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.
In another embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating an X-ray projection view of the said object using an X-ray source; d) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a plurality of transmission detectors; and e) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a plurality of energy discriminating detectors which are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.
In one embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object using a first X-ray source; d) generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object using a second X-ray source; e) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a first set and second set of transmission detectors; and f) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a third set and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors which are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.
In another embodiment, the present specification describes a system for screening objects, comprising: a) a receptacle for holding an object; b) a conveyor to move the said receptacle through an inspection region; c) a first X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object; d) a second X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object; e) a first set and a second set of transmission detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object; f) a third and a fourth set of energy discriminating detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object, wherein said third and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle; and g) a processor for receiving output signals from said first, second, third and fourth sets of detectors and overlaying said output signals onto a visual image of the said receptacle and object.
In yet another embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object using a first X-ray source; d) generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object using a second X-ray source; e) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a first and second set of transmission detectors; f) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a third and fourth set of energy discriminating wherein said third and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle; and g) processing the output signals from said first, second, third and fourth sets of detectors to form a visual image of the said receptacle and object.
In one embodiment, the receptacle is a tray further comprising a foam insert that has at least one channel to align the said object for screening. In one embodiment, the object is a LAG item.
In one embodiment, the first and second transmission detectors are dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors while the third and fourth energy discriminating detectors are fabricated from high-Z semiconductor materials including cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI2), gallium arsenide (GaAs).
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
The present specification is directed towards scanning objects for threat/contraband detection. In one embodiment, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is configured for screening objects at aviation security checkpoints. However, in alternate embodiments, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is deployable at any such sites/places that are likely to be targets of terrorist activities—such as, border security checkpoints, entrances to buildings or other vulnerable premises, concert venues, sports venues, and the like.
In one embodiment, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is configured as a single-view system using dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors that are partially populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors for overall enhanced energy resolution and therefore improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number.
In one embodiment, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is configured as a dual-view system using dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors that are partially populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors for overall enhanced energy resolution and therefore improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number.
In one embodiment, the transmission detectors are dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors while the energy discriminating detectors are fabricated from high-Z semiconductor materials including cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI2), gallium arsenide (GaAs).
In accordance with an aspect of the present specification, a “receptacle” can be defined as an open, closed or closable vessel or container for housing objects that need to be scanned. The receptacle ensures that the objects therein are aligned, restricted, constrained or positioned to occupy a predetermined or predefined volumetric space with reference to the source, detector and conveyor configuration of an inspection system. In one embodiment the receptacle is an open tray. In another embodiment, the receptacle is a box with a closable lid. In accordance with one embodiment, the size of the receptacle is on the order of 550 mm wide×685 mm long×140 mm high.
In alternate embodiments, the receptacle is a piece of luggage or baggage containing objects that are not necessarily placed, positioned, oriented, or restricted in a predetermined fashion relative to the inspection system. Instead, the objects are placed in a random fashion as would be expected in typical luggage/baggage.
In accordance with an aspect of the present specification, an “object to be screened” can be defined as an open, closed or closable vessel, container or housing containing liquid or gel-based items that resemble liquid or gel-based explosives/threats such as liquid, aerosol and gel items (hereinafter referred to as “LAG” items). Categories of LAG items typically found in passenger carry-on baggage include, but are not limited to, alcohol/perfume/deodorants, drinks, foods, household products, medicines, toiletries, and the like. Prior to screening, LAG items are typically divested from baggage, luggage or personal effects and placed in a receptacle for scanning. In accordance with one embodiment, the object is of a size range that allows it to be placed in the receptacle. In one embodiment, volume ranges for a typical vessel to be screened are from 100 mL to 2000 mL.
In alternate embodiments, the object comprises any solid, powder or plastic-based threat or contraband items known to persons of ordinary skill in the art and is not limited to LAG items.
The present invention is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
It should be appreciated that the detector array of the present specification is known as a folded “L” detector configuration, and is made from multiple detector modules 120, 122. Each detector module is positioned at a different angle so as to be perpendicular to the X-ray fan beam. A typical small tunnel X-ray scanner will use approximately 10 detector modules. Not every detector module needs to be replaced with an energy discriminating detector module for the desired performance improvement. The projection of the container onto the image array determines which detector modules need to be of the energy discriminating variety. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
During screening, the sources project fan beams of X-rays onto the receptacle 135 such that the radiation-fans intersect the conveyor 130 substantially perpendicular relative to the conveyor surface. As shown in
As shown in
In one embodiment, the at least one object 215 is a LAG item that is divested from baggage/luggage and put in the tray 205 for scanning. However, in alternate embodiments, object 215 can be any item that is required to be scanned for threat resolution. In one embodiment, the object 215 is a piece of luggage/baggage and is scanned as-is, while being conveyed, without the need for putting the luggage/baggage or objects divested from the luggage/baggage in the tray 205.
Referring back to
In one embodiment, the multiple-energy discriminating detectors 122, 127 are solid state detectors made from semiconductor materials such as cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI2), gallium arsenide (GaAs) or any other high-Z material that enables the detectors to be operable at room temperature. These detectors have high energy resolution, as compared to the dual energy stacked detectors and are direct conversion devices (that is, convert radioactive particles, such as photons, directly into electronic signals).
In one embodiment, a low-noise, low-power, multi-channel readout application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) is used for the acquisition of scan data. Each channel of the ASIC has an energy discriminating circuit and a time discriminating circuit. The ASIC also has built-in analog to digital converters (ADCs), or digitizers, to digitize the signal from energy and timing sub-channels. Variation in the digital output of the ASIC is tracked from a reference signal output to generate correction coefficients. The correction coefficients may be then applied to subsequent digital outputs to eliminate or reduce temperature-induced error.
System 100 also comprises at least one processor (such as a computer) having access to a memory for storing programmatic instructions in the form of software and/or firmware. The at least one processor may be local to, or remote from, the X-ray source and detectors. Similarly, the memory and programmatic instructions may be local to, or remote from, the X-ray source and detectors.
In a single-view configuration, when the programmatic instructions are executed, the at least one processor: a) reconstructs a combined image from scan data generated by the detectors 120, 122 wherein each pixel within the image represents an associated mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at a specific point in space and for a specific energy level; b) fits each of the pixels to a function to determine the mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at the point in space; and c) uses the function to automatically determine the identity or threat status of the object under inspection.
In a dual-view configuration, when the programmatic instructions are executed, the at least one processor: a) reconstructs a combined image from scan data generated by the detectors 120, 122, 125 and 127, wherein each pixel within the image represents an associated mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at a specific point in space and for a specific energy level; b) fits each of the pixels to a function to determine the mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at the point in space; and c) uses the function to automatically determine the identity or threat status of the object under inspection.
In one embodiment, the function yields a relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy. The function relates the energy response of the detector arrays at each energy within a range of energies multiplied by a function of the object's linear attenuation coefficient and density. Determining the identity or threat status of the object under inspection is performed by comparing the object's linear attenuation coefficient function to data comprising linear attenuation coefficient functions of predefined materials. The comparison yields a fit comparing the relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy obtained from the object under inspection to pre-computed material data for known materials. This allows for improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number. Based on the comparison, pixels which are determined to qualify as potential threat materials are automatically highlighted within the image.
Since the multiple-energy discriminating detectors possess higher energy resolution compared to the remaining stacked detectors, persons of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the use of multiple energy discriminating detectors enhances the physical property measurement of the system and therefore improves the automated threat detection capabilities.
Referring again to
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present invention. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/749,838, entitled “X-Ray Scanner with Partial Energy Discriminating Detector Array” and filed on Jan. 7, 2013, for priority. The aforementioned application is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2299251 | Perbal | Oct 1942 | A |
2831123 | Daly | Apr 1958 | A |
3707672 | Miller | Dec 1972 | A |
3713156 | Pothier | Jan 1973 | A |
3766387 | Heffan | Oct 1973 | A |
3784837 | Holmstrom | Jan 1974 | A |
RE28544 | Stein | Sep 1975 | E |
4047035 | Dennhoven | Sep 1977 | A |
4122783 | Pretini | Oct 1978 | A |
4139771 | Dennhoven | Feb 1979 | A |
4210811 | Dennhoven | Jul 1980 | A |
4216499 | Dennhoven | Aug 1980 | A |
4366382 | Kotowski | Dec 1982 | A |
4399403 | Strandberg | Aug 1983 | A |
4430568 | Yoshida | Feb 1984 | A |
4471343 | Lemelson | Sep 1984 | A |
4566113 | Doenges | Jan 1986 | A |
4599740 | Cable | Jul 1986 | A |
4641330 | Herwig | Feb 1987 | A |
4736401 | Donges | Apr 1988 | A |
4754469 | Harding | Jun 1988 | A |
4788704 | Donges | Nov 1988 | A |
4789930 | Sones | Dec 1988 | A |
4825454 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4884289 | Glockmann | Nov 1989 | A |
4956856 | Harding | Sep 1990 | A |
4975968 | Yukl | Dec 1990 | A |
4979202 | Siczek | Dec 1990 | A |
4991189 | Boomgaarden | Feb 1991 | A |
5007072 | Jenkins | Apr 1991 | A |
5008911 | Harding | Apr 1991 | A |
5022062 | Annis | Jun 1991 | A |
5065418 | Bermbach | Nov 1991 | A |
5081456 | Michiguchi | Jan 1992 | A |
5091924 | Bermbach | Feb 1992 | A |
5098640 | Gozani | Mar 1992 | A |
5179581 | Annis | Jan 1993 | A |
5181234 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann | Jan 1993 | A |
5224144 | Annis | Jun 1993 | A |
5227800 | Huguenin | Jul 1993 | A |
5237598 | Albert | Aug 1993 | A |
5247561 | Kotowski | Sep 1993 | A |
5253283 | Annis | Oct 1993 | A |
5263075 | McGann | Nov 1993 | A |
5265144 | Harding | Nov 1993 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5339080 | Steinway | Aug 1994 | A |
5345240 | Frazier | Sep 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5379334 | Zimmer | Jan 1995 | A |
5420905 | Bertozzi | May 1995 | A |
5493596 | Annis | Feb 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale | Jun 1996 | A |
5552705 | Keller | Sep 1996 | A |
5557283 | Sheen | Sep 1996 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5638420 | Armistead | Jun 1997 | A |
5642393 | Krug | Jun 1997 | A |
5642394 | Rothschild | Jun 1997 | A |
5666393 | Annis | Sep 1997 | A |
5687210 | Maitrejean | Nov 1997 | A |
5689239 | Turner | Nov 1997 | A |
5692028 | Geus | Nov 1997 | A |
5745543 | De | Apr 1998 | A |
5751837 | Watanabe | May 1998 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5768334 | Maitrejean | Jun 1998 | A |
5787145 | Geus | Jul 1998 | A |
5805660 | Perion | Sep 1998 | A |
5838759 | Armistead | Nov 1998 | A |
5841832 | Mazess | Nov 1998 | A |
5903623 | Swift | May 1999 | A |
5910973 | Grodzins | Jun 1999 | A |
5930326 | Rothschild | Jul 1999 | A |
5940468 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
6026135 | McFee | Feb 2000 | A |
6031890 | Bermbach | Feb 2000 | A |
6054712 | Komardin | Apr 2000 | A |
6058158 | Eiler | May 2000 | A |
6067344 | Grodzins | May 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6094472 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6118850 | Mayo | Sep 2000 | A |
6128365 | Bechwati | Oct 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6184841 | Shober | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188743 | Tybinkowski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188747 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192101 | Grodzins | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195413 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198795 | Naumann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218943 | Ellenbogen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252929 | Swift | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256369 | Lai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278115 | Annis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282260 | Grodzins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288676 | Maloney | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292533 | Swift | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301326 | Bjorkholm | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6320933 | Grodzins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342696 | Chadwick | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356620 | Rothschild | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359582 | MacAleese | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359597 | Haj-Yousef | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6417797 | Cousins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424695 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434219 | Rothschild | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435715 | Betz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445765 | Frank | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453003 | Springer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453007 | Adams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456093 | Merkel | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456684 | Mun | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469624 | Whan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473487 | Le | Oct 2002 | B1 |
RE37899 | Grodzins | Nov 2002 | E |
6480141 | Toth | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483894 | Hartick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501414 | Arndt | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507025 | Verbinski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532276 | Hartick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542578 | Ries | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542580 | Carver | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563903 | Kang | May 2003 | B2 |
6580778 | Meder | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584170 | Aust | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597760 | Beneke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606516 | Levine | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6628745 | Annis | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636581 | Sorenson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650276 | Lawless | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653588 | Gillard-Hickman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658087 | Chalmers | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663280 | Doenges | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665373 | Kotowski | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665433 | Roder | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6705357 | Jeon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6735477 | Levine | May 2004 | B2 |
6763635 | Lowman | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765527 | Jablonski | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768317 | Moeller | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6785357 | Bernardi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796944 | Hall | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798863 | Sato | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812426 | Kotowski | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816571 | Bijjani | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831590 | Steinway | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837422 | Meder | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839403 | Kotowski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843599 | Le | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856271 | Hausner | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856344 | Frantz | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6876322 | Keller | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891381 | Bailey | May 2005 | B2 |
6894636 | Anderton | May 2005 | B2 |
6920197 | Kang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922460 | Skatter | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928141 | Carver | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7039159 | Muenchau | May 2006 | B2 |
7092485 | Kravis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103137 | Seppi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7207713 | Lowman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7322745 | Agrawal | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7356115 | Ford | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366282 | Peschmann | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369643 | Kotowski | May 2008 | B2 |
7417440 | Peschmann | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486768 | Allman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492228 | Strange | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7579845 | Peschmann | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606348 | Foland | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609807 | Leue | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7720195 | Allman | May 2010 | B2 |
7831012 | Foland | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7856081 | Peschmann | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7928400 | Diawara | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7995705 | Allman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005189 | Ripp | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8138770 | Peschmann | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8385501 | Allman | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8428217 | Peschmann | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8674706 | Peschmann | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020008655 | Haj-Yousef | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030009202 | Levine | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030068557 | Kumashiro | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030179126 | Jablonski | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185340 | Frantz | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216644 | Hall | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040077943 | Meaney | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040141584 | Bernardi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050058242 | Peschmann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050117700 | Peschmann | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050180542 | Leue | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060145771 | Strange | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080170670 | Bhatt | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080230709 | Tkaczyk | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090010386 | Peschmann | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090285353 | Ellenbogen | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100295689 | Armistead | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110235777 | Gozani | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120104276 | Miller | May 2012 | A1 |
20120300897 | Flohr | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130294574 | Peschmann | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150177391 | Cox | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150325010 | Bedford | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2299251 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2004010127 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2008135897 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2014107675 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2016011205 | Jan 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/010370, dated May 13, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,256. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/858,479. |
Sheen, David et al. ‘Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Imaging for Concealed Weapon Detection’, Sep. 2001, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 1581-1592. |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,177. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,177. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/040653, dated Dec. 16, 2015. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP14735293, dated Jul. 11, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140192954 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61749838 | Jan 2013 | US |