X-ray scanner with partial energy discriminating detector array

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10353109
  • Patent Number
    10,353,109
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 19, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 16, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
The present specification describes a scanning/inspection system configured as a dual-view system using dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors that are partially populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors for overall enhanced energy resolution and therefore improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number.
Description
FIELD

The present specification relates to X-ray inspection systems. More particularly, the present specification relates to a source, detector and object configuration, whereby the energy transmitted through the object being inspected is measured at improved energy resolutions.


BACKGROUND

Due to persistent security threats and the possibility of terrorist activities, there is a need for deploying high speed, high resolution, and accurate screening devices at places that are likely targets of such activities. In addition, there exists a requirement for screening of baggage and other items for explosives, contraband and other illicit materials. This requires a screening system which is capable of discriminating between different materials based on one or more unique features of each material such as effective atomic number, chemical structure, physical density, among other variables.


Cabinet X-ray scanners are capable of performing automated threat detection on articles of baggage and divested items by calculating physical properties of objects from the two-dimensional image generated. For example, material density can be estimated from at least two co-planar projection views. Z-effective can be estimated from at least two overlapping projection views acquired at different energy levels. Thus, increasing the number of views or number of energy levels permits for more precise estimations of physical properties such as material density and Z-effective.


Conventional cabinet X-ray systems have a limited number of co-planar views. It is highly desirable for commercial reasons to have as few views as necessary. Typically, a planar X-ray view consists of an X-ray generator and a linear array of X-ray detectors, which constitutes a majority of the component costs in an X-ray scanner. Each additional view increases the component cost of the scanner in an incremental manner. Thus, two views would imply twice the cost of a single view, three views would increase the cost three times, and so forth. Therefore, achieving desired imaging or automated detection performance with the fewest number of views allows the lowest component cost. Increasing performance through other means, such as higher performance detectors, becomes desirable because of the potential lower increase in component cost.


Further, increasing energy discrimination also has a detrimental impact on component cost. Commercially available X-ray detectors currently permit up to 128 channels of energy discrimination. Populating a multiple or even a single projection X-ray detector array with energy discriminating detectors is commercially prohibitive. The cost of energy discriminating detectors is significantly higher than conventional dual-energy detector arrays. For example, a conventional single-view X-ray scanner equipped with energy discriminating detectors would incur a three-fold increase in component cost. Reducing the number of energy discriminating detectors employed to increase performance becomes an attractive option, especially if the incremental increase in component cost is less than doubling the cost of the machine, i.e. less than the cost of adding a second view.


For an application such as liquids screening, it is desirable to have the full range of energy information permitting for a spectroscopic analysis of the contents in the divested container. Therefore, some applications present the opportunity to restrict the concept of operations such that only a portion of the projection view needs to be populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors in order to obtain improved estimation of the physical properties necessary for effective threat detection. For example, with respect to the divestiture of liquid containers at an aviation security checkpoint for separate threat detection analysis, only a portion of a bin or container need be screened using multi-energy discriminating detectors.


Thus, what is needed is an X-ray scanner, having at least a single-view, with limited energy discriminating detector coverage that can meet or exceed the automated detection performance of a dual-view X-ray scanner and still have a lower component cost, thus achieving the trade-off between cost and performance.


Accordingly, there is a need for an X-ray system that has an overall improved energy resolution to discriminate and therefore detect certain materials of interest.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, the present specification describes a system for screening objects, comprising: a) a receptacle for holding an object; b) a conveyor to move the receptacle through an inspection region; c) first X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object; d) a second X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object; e) a first set and a second set of transmission detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object; and f) a third and a fourth set of energy discriminating detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object, wherein said third and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.


In one embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating an X-ray projection view of the said object using an X-ray source; d) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using transmission detectors and at least one energy discriminating detector which is positioned such that it aligns with the object within the receptacle.


In one embodiment, the present specification describes a system for screening objects, comprising: a) a receptacle for holding an object; b) a conveyor to move the receptacle through an inspection region; c) an X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating an X-ray projection view of the said object; d) a plurality of transmission detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object; and e) a plurality of energy discriminating detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object, wherein said plurality of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.


In another embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating an X-ray projection view of the said object using an X-ray source; d) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a plurality of transmission detectors; and e) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a plurality of energy discriminating detectors which are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.


In one embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object using a first X-ray source; d) generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object using a second X-ray source; e) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a first set and second set of transmission detectors; and f) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a third set and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors which are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle.


In another embodiment, the present specification describes a system for screening objects, comprising: a) a receptacle for holding an object; b) a conveyor to move the said receptacle through an inspection region; c) a first X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object; d) a second X-ray source for transmitting X-rays through the object for generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object; e) a first set and a second set of transmission detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object; f) a third and a fourth set of energy discriminating detectors for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the said object, wherein said third and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle; and g) a processor for receiving output signals from said first, second, third and fourth sets of detectors and overlaying said output signals onto a visual image of the said receptacle and object.


In yet another embodiment, the present specification describes a method for screening objects, comprising: a) providing a receptacle to hold and align an object; b) moving the said receptacle through an inspection region using a conveyor; c) generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the said object using a first X-ray source; d) generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the said object using a second X-ray source; e) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a first and second set of transmission detectors; f) detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a third and fourth set of energy discriminating wherein said third and fourth set of energy discriminating detectors are positioned such that they align with the object within the receptacle; and g) processing the output signals from said first, second, third and fourth sets of detectors to form a visual image of the said receptacle and object.


In one embodiment, the receptacle is a tray further comprising a foam insert that has at least one channel to align the said object for screening. In one embodiment, the object is a LAG item.


In one embodiment, the first and second transmission detectors are dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors while the third and fourth energy discriminating detectors are fabricated from high-Z semiconductor materials including cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI2), gallium arsenide (GaAs).


The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1A is a side perspective view of the inspection system of the present specification showing a source irradiating an object to obtain a vertical projection view of the object;



FIG. 1B is a side perspective view of the inspection system of the present specification showing a source irradiating the object to obtain a horizontal projection view of the object;



FIG. 2A shows a receptacle of the present specification in the form of a tray holding objects to be scanned; and



FIG. 2B is an X-ray image of the tray of FIG. 2A obtained using a dual-view embodiment of the inspection system of the present specification.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present specification is directed towards scanning objects for threat/contraband detection. In one embodiment, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is configured for screening objects at aviation security checkpoints. However, in alternate embodiments, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is deployable at any such sites/places that are likely to be targets of terrorist activities—such as, border security checkpoints, entrances to buildings or other vulnerable premises, concert venues, sports venues, and the like.


In one embodiment, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is configured as a single-view system using dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors that are partially populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors for overall enhanced energy resolution and therefore improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number.


In one embodiment, the scanning/inspection system of the present specification is configured as a dual-view system using dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors that are partially populated with multi-energy discriminating detectors for overall enhanced energy resolution and therefore improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number.


In one embodiment, the transmission detectors are dual-energy sensitive stacked detectors while the energy discriminating detectors are fabricated from high-Z semiconductor materials including cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI2), gallium arsenide (GaAs).


In accordance with an aspect of the present specification, a “receptacle” can be defined as an open, closed or closable vessel or container for housing objects that need to be scanned. The receptacle ensures that the objects therein are aligned, restricted, constrained or positioned to occupy a predetermined or predefined volumetric space with reference to the source, detector and conveyor configuration of an inspection system. In one embodiment the receptacle is an open tray. In another embodiment, the receptacle is a box with a closable lid. In accordance with one embodiment, the size of the receptacle is on the order of 550 mm wide×685 mm long×140 mm high.


In alternate embodiments, the receptacle is a piece of luggage or baggage containing objects that are not necessarily placed, positioned, oriented, or restricted in a predetermined fashion relative to the inspection system. Instead, the objects are placed in a random fashion as would be expected in typical luggage/baggage.


In accordance with an aspect of the present specification, an “object to be screened” can be defined as an open, closed or closable vessel, container or housing containing liquid or gel-based items that resemble liquid or gel-based explosives/threats such as liquid, aerosol and gel items (hereinafter referred to as “LAG” items). Categories of LAG items typically found in passenger carry-on baggage include, but are not limited to, alcohol/perfume/deodorants, drinks, foods, household products, medicines, toiletries, and the like. Prior to screening, LAG items are typically divested from baggage, luggage or personal effects and placed in a receptacle for scanning. In accordance with one embodiment, the object is of a size range that allows it to be placed in the receptacle. In one embodiment, volume ranges for a typical vessel to be screened are from 100 mL to 2000 mL.


In alternate embodiments, the object comprises any solid, powder or plastic-based threat or contraband items known to persons of ordinary skill in the art and is not limited to LAG items.


The present invention is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.



FIG. 1A shows a side perspective view of an embodiment of an energy discriminating partial array inspection system 100 of the present specification in which a single-view vertical projection is provided. System 100 comprises a support frame 105 holding a first X-ray source 110 with focusing means, such as a collimating slit, and a first enhanced array 119 of stacked detectors 120 populated with at least one multi-energy discriminating detector 122 in accordance with an aspect of the present specification. In one embodiment, the detectors are placed in an L-shaped configuration; however, other configurations may be acceptable provided that the detectors are appropriately positioned relative to the inspection region and X-ray source.


It should be appreciated that the detector array of the present specification is known as a folded “L” detector configuration, and is made from multiple detector modules 120, 122. Each detector module is positioned at a different angle so as to be perpendicular to the X-ray fan beam. A typical small tunnel X-ray scanner will use approximately 10 detector modules. Not every detector module needs to be replaced with an energy discriminating detector module for the desired performance improvement. The projection of the container onto the image array determines which detector modules need to be of the energy discriminating variety. Referring to FIG. 1A, two energy discriminating modules 122 are shown to provide the advantages of the present specification.



FIG. 1B is a side perspective view of an embodiment of an energy discriminating partial array inspection system 100 of the present specification in which a single-view horizontal projection is provided. System 100 comprises a support frame 105 holding a second X-ray source 115 with focusing means, such as a collimating slit, and an enhanced array 124 of stacked detectors 125 partially populated with at least one, and preferably two, multi-energy discriminating detectors 127 in accordance with an aspect of the present specification. In one embodiment, the detectors are placed in an L-shaped configuration; however, other configurations may be acceptable provided that the detectors are appropriately positioned relative to the inspection region and X-ray source. The energy discriminating detectors must be positioned to provide the image of the container under inspection. The information contained within the image of the container is used for the analysis and determination of the contents.


Referring to FIGS. 1A and 1B simultaneously, an inspection area/region in the form of a tunnel is defined between the sources and detectors to allow a receptacle 135 to be transported through using a conveyor 130. The receptacle 135 holds an object that is to be screened. It should be noted by those of ordinary skill in the art that while the present embodiment of the system 100 is a dual projection view system comprising two sources, in alternate embodiments the system 100 is a single projection view system comprising a single source whereas in still further embodiments the system 100 is a multi-projection view system comprising more than two sources. In one embodiment, the dual projection view system of the present invention employs 10 detector modules within detector array 119 for the vertical view and 9 detector modules within detector array 124 for the horizontal view.


Referring to FIGS. 1A and 1B simultaneously, in one embodiment, a minimum of two energy discriminating modules 122, 127, respectively, are employed in each detector array for significant enhancement of the physical property measurement of the system of the present specification in order to obtain a complete image of the container. Further, the embodiments shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B can be combined to provide a dual-view embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2B.


During screening, the sources project fan beams of X-rays onto the receptacle 135 such that the radiation-fans intersect the conveyor 130 substantially perpendicular relative to the conveyor surface. As shown in FIG. 1A, in one embodiment, source 110 is positioned to form a vertical projection view 140. In accordance with another aspect of the present specification, the receptacle 135 ensures that the position of the object to be screened is aligned or restricted relative to the source, detector and conveyor configuration so that portion 142 of the fan beam projection views 140 are sensed by the multi-energy discriminating detectors 122 to obtain improved estimation of the physical properties of the object for effective threat detection. This is described in greater detail below with respect to FIG. 2B.


As shown in FIG. 1B, in one embodiment, source 115 is positioned to form a horizontal projection view 145. In accordance with another aspect of the present specification, the receptacle 135 ensures that the position of the object to be screened is aligned or restricted relative to the source, detector and conveyor configuration so that portion 147 of the fan beam projection views 145 are sensed by the multi-energy discriminating detectors 127 to obtain improved estimation of the physical properties of the object for effective threat detection.



FIG. 2A shows an embodiment of an exemplary receptacle of the present specification in the form of a tray 205. The tray 205 comprises, in one embodiment, a foam insert 210 further comprising at least one channel for aligning at least one object 215 in an optimum position for screening. The insert is, in one embodiment, a mechanical component to ensure the container is in the optimum position for screening, which includes not having contact with other high density objects and mostly lifting the container off the belt for a cleaner view in the image. The insert does not need to be made of foam; it can be made of any lower density material than the container or contents for which screening is desired. In one embodiment, it is possible to make the plastic tray such that it can present the container for analysis, thus obviating the need for an insert.



FIG. 2B shows a dual-view X-ray image of the tray 205 while being transported on a conveyor belt. In accordance with an embodiment of the present specification, dimension B is the width of the conveyor belt 220 (the tunnel walls being very close to the edge of the belt). The tray 205 is wide enough such that is does not permit side-to-side movement. The width of the tray 205 coupled with the size and position of the channel in the foam insert 210 limits the region that can be occupied by the object 215 to a dimension A. Dimension A defines the minimum regions of the imaging arrays (for the respective projection views) that are required to be populated with energy discriminating detectors to enable a more precise physical property measurement (shown as portions 142, 147 in FIGS. 1A and 1B, respectively). In one embodiment, dimension A has a maximum of 125 mm at the belt, and when projected on the detector array this maximum dimension will occupy 20% of the imaging array while dimension B is 575 mm.


In one embodiment, the at least one object 215 is a LAG item that is divested from baggage/luggage and put in the tray 205 for scanning. However, in alternate embodiments, object 215 can be any item that is required to be scanned for threat resolution. In one embodiment, the object 215 is a piece of luggage/baggage and is scanned as-is, while being conveyed, without the need for putting the luggage/baggage or objects divested from the luggage/baggage in the tray 205.


Referring back to FIGS. 1A and 1B, the stacked detectors 120, 125 generate dual energy scan data in accordance with one embodiment. As known to persons of ordinary skill in the art, stacked detectors comprise a first detector positioned to detect more of the lower energy, or the softer X-ray photons, and a second detector positioned to detect the balance of the energy, namely the higher energy, or the harder photons. The second detector is typically positioned behind the first detector. The low energy and high energy measurements are combined in a suitable way using a series of calibration measurements derived from dual energy measurements taken of identified organic and metallic materials of known thicknesses and result in the display of images, including organic only or metal only images. The first and second detectors consist of linear arrays of silicon photodiodes covered with scintillation material, which produce light when exposed to X-rays. The light is detected by the photodiodes that produce corresponding photo current signals. The detected data are converted to digital format, corrected for detector gain and offset, and then stored for processing. In another embodiment, detectors 120, 125 are conventional single energy arrays as known to persons of ordinary skill in the art.


In one embodiment, the multiple-energy discriminating detectors 122, 127 are solid state detectors made from semiconductor materials such as cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI2), gallium arsenide (GaAs) or any other high-Z material that enables the detectors to be operable at room temperature. These detectors have high energy resolution, as compared to the dual energy stacked detectors and are direct conversion devices (that is, convert radioactive particles, such as photons, directly into electronic signals).


In one embodiment, a low-noise, low-power, multi-channel readout application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) is used for the acquisition of scan data. Each channel of the ASIC has an energy discriminating circuit and a time discriminating circuit. The ASIC also has built-in analog to digital converters (ADCs), or digitizers, to digitize the signal from energy and timing sub-channels. Variation in the digital output of the ASIC is tracked from a reference signal output to generate correction coefficients. The correction coefficients may be then applied to subsequent digital outputs to eliminate or reduce temperature-induced error.


System 100 also comprises at least one processor (such as a computer) having access to a memory for storing programmatic instructions in the form of software and/or firmware. The at least one processor may be local to, or remote from, the X-ray source and detectors. Similarly, the memory and programmatic instructions may be local to, or remote from, the X-ray source and detectors.


In a single-view configuration, when the programmatic instructions are executed, the at least one processor: a) reconstructs a combined image from scan data generated by the detectors 120, 122 wherein each pixel within the image represents an associated mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at a specific point in space and for a specific energy level; b) fits each of the pixels to a function to determine the mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at the point in space; and c) uses the function to automatically determine the identity or threat status of the object under inspection.


In a dual-view configuration, when the programmatic instructions are executed, the at least one processor: a) reconstructs a combined image from scan data generated by the detectors 120, 122, 125 and 127, wherein each pixel within the image represents an associated mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at a specific point in space and for a specific energy level; b) fits each of the pixels to a function to determine the mass attenuation coefficient of the object under inspection at the point in space; and c) uses the function to automatically determine the identity or threat status of the object under inspection.


In one embodiment, the function yields a relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy. The function relates the energy response of the detector arrays at each energy within a range of energies multiplied by a function of the object's linear attenuation coefficient and density. Determining the identity or threat status of the object under inspection is performed by comparing the object's linear attenuation coefficient function to data comprising linear attenuation coefficient functions of predefined materials. The comparison yields a fit comparing the relationship between mass attenuation coefficients and logarithmic values of energy obtained from the object under inspection to pre-computed material data for known materials. This allows for improved discrimination of materials through better estimation of material physical properties such as density and effective atomic number. Based on the comparison, pixels which are determined to qualify as potential threat materials are automatically highlighted within the image.


Since the multiple-energy discriminating detectors possess higher energy resolution compared to the remaining stacked detectors, persons of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the use of multiple energy discriminating detectors enhances the physical property measurement of the system and therefore improves the automated threat detection capabilities.


Referring again to FIGS. 1A and 1B, during operation, when the receptacle containing the object under inspection is moving through the tunnel on conveyor 130 and passing through the X-ray projection fan beams of sources 110, 115, the detector modules 120, 122, 125 and 127 are sampled repetitively. The projection or scan data pertaining to the dual energy stacked detectors 120, 125 as well as the multi-energy discriminating detectors 122, 127 are displayed as an integrated image output such that there is no perceivable difference in the region of the image owing to the multi-energy discriminating detectors as opposed to the stacked detectors.


The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present invention. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for screening an object, comprising: a conveyor to move the object through an inspection region;a first X-ray source configured to transmit X rays through the object for generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the object;a second X-ray source configured to transmit for X rays through the object for generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the object, wherein the vertical X-ray projection view and horizontal X-ray projection view spatially overlap and define the inspection region;a first array of detectors, wherein the first array of detectors comprises a first set of dual-energy sensitive detectors and a first set of energy discriminating detectors positioned adjacent, not behind, each other relative to the first X-ray source; anda second array of detectors, wherein the second array of detectors comprises a second set of dual-energy sensitive detectors and a second set of energy discriminating detectors positioned adjacent, not behind, each other relative to the first X-ray source and wherein the second array of detectors are positioned substantially perpendicular to the first array of detectors within the inspection region.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 further comprising a receptacle configured to carry the object on the conveyor, wherein the receptacle is a tray further comprising a foam insert that has at least one channel to align the object for screening.
  • 3. The system of claim 1 wherein the first set of dual-energy sensitive detectors comprise stacked detectors.
  • 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the first set of energy discriminating detectors and second set of energy discriminating detectors are fabricated from high-Z semiconductor materials including at least one of cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI.sub.2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI.sub.2), or gallium arsenide (GaAs).
  • 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the object is a liquid, aerosol, gel (LAG) item.
  • 6. The system of claim 1 further comprising a processor for receiving output signals from each of the first array of detectors and the second array of detectors and overlaying said output signals onto a visual image of the object.
  • 7. A method for screening an objects, comprising: moving the object through an inspection region using a conveyor;generating a vertical X-ray projection view of the object using a first X-ray source;generating a horizontal X-ray projection view of the object using a second X-ray source, wherein the vertical X-ray projection view and horizontal X-ray projection view spatially overlap and define the inspection region;detecting X-rays transmitted through the said object using a first array of detectors and a second array of detectors, wherein the first array of detectors comprises a first set of dual-energy sensitive detectors and a first set of energy discriminating detectors positioned adjacent, not behind, each other relative to the first X-ray source and wherein the second array of detectors comprises a second set of dual-energy sensitive detectors and a second set of energy discriminating detectors positioned adjacent, not behind, each other relative to the first X-ray source and wherein the second array of detectors are positioned substantially perpendicular to the first array of detectors within the inspection region.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 further comprising a receptacle wherein the receptacle is a tray further comprising a foam insert that has at least one channel to align the object for screening.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 wherein the first set of dual energy sensitive detectors and the second set of dual energy sensitive detectors comprise stacked detectors.
  • 10. The method of claim 7 wherein the first set and second set of energy discriminating detectors comprise at least one of high-Z semiconductor materials, cadmium-telluride (CdTe), cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT), mercury iodide (HgI.sub.2), selenium (Se), lead iodide (PbI.sub.2), or gallium arsenide (GaAs).
  • 11. The method of claim 7 wherein the object is a liquid, aerosol, gel (LAG) item.
  • 12. The method of claim 7 further comprising processing output signals from the first array of detectors and the second array of detectors to form a visual image of the object.
CROSS-REFERENCE

The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/148,452, entitled “X-Ray Scanner with Partial Energy Discriminating Detector Array” and filed on Jan. 6, 2014, which relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/749,838, of the same title and filed on Jan. 7, 2013, for priority. The aforementioned applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (240)
Number Name Date Kind
2299251 Perbal Oct 1942 A
2831123 Daly Apr 1958 A
3707672 Miller Dec 1972 A
3713156 Pothier Jan 1973 A
3766387 Heffan Oct 1973 A
3784837 Holmstrom Jan 1974 A
4047035 Dennhoven Sep 1977 A
4122783 Pretini Oct 1978 A
4139771 Dennhoven Feb 1979 A
4210811 Dennhoven Jul 1980 A
4216499 Dennhoven Aug 1980 A
4366382 Kotowski Dec 1982 A
4399403 Strandberg Aug 1983 A
4430568 Yoshida Feb 1984 A
4471343 Lemelson Sep 1984 A
4566113 Doenges Jan 1986 A
4599740 Cable Jul 1986 A
4641330 Herwig Feb 1987 A
4736401 Donges Apr 1988 A
4754469 Harding Jun 1988 A
4788704 Donges Nov 1988 A
4789930 Sones Dec 1988 A
4825454 Annis Apr 1989 A
4884289 Glockmann Nov 1989 A
4956856 Harding Sep 1990 A
4975968 Yukl Dec 1990 A
4979202 Siczek Dec 1990 A
4991189 Boomgaarden Feb 1991 A
5007072 Jenkins Apr 1991 A
5008911 Harding Apr 1991 A
5022062 Annis Jun 1991 A
5065418 Bermbach Nov 1991 A
5081456 Michiguchi Jan 1992 A
5091924 Bermbach Feb 1992 A
5098640 Gozani Mar 1992 A
5179581 Annis Jan 1993 A
5181234 Smith Jan 1993 A
5182764 Peschmann Jan 1993 A
5224144 Annis Jun 1993 A
5227800 Huguenin Jul 1993 A
5237598 Albert Aug 1993 A
5247561 Kotowski Sep 1993 A
5253283 Annis Oct 1993 A
5263075 McGann Nov 1993 A
5265144 Harding Nov 1993 A
5313511 Annis May 1994 A
5339080 Steinway Aug 1994 A
5345240 Frazier Sep 1994 A
5367552 Peschmann Nov 1994 A
5379334 Zimmer Jan 1995 A
5420905 Bertozzi May 1995 A
5493596 Annis Feb 1996 A
5524133 Neale Jun 1996 A
5552705 Keller Sep 1996 A
5557283 Sheen Sep 1996 A
5600303 Husseiny Feb 1997 A
5600700 Krug Feb 1997 A
5638420 Armistead Jun 1997 A
5642393 Krug Jun 1997 A
5642394 Rothschild Jun 1997 A
5666393 Annis Sep 1997 A
5687210 Maitrejean Nov 1997 A
5689239 Turner Nov 1997 A
5692028 Geus Nov 1997 A
5745543 De Apr 1998 A
5751837 Watanabe May 1998 A
5764683 Swift Jun 1998 A
5768334 Maitrejean Jun 1998 A
5787145 Geus Jul 1998 A
5805660 Perion Sep 1998 A
5838759 Armistead Nov 1998 A
5841832 Mazess Nov 1998 A
5903623 Swift May 1999 A
5910973 Grodzins Jun 1999 A
5930326 Rothschild Jul 1999 A
5940468 Huang Aug 1999 A
5974111 Krug Oct 1999 A
6026135 McFee Feb 2000 A
6031890 Bermbach Feb 2000 A
6054712 Komardin Apr 2000 A
6058158 Eiler May 2000 A
6067344 Grodzins May 2000 A
6081580 Grodzins Jun 2000 A
6094472 Smith Jul 2000 A
6118850 Mayo Sep 2000 A
6128365 Bechwati Oct 2000 A
6151381 Grodzins Nov 2000 A
6184841 Shober Feb 2001 B1
6188743 Tybinkowski Feb 2001 B1
6188747 Geus Feb 2001 B1
6192101 Grodzins Feb 2001 B1
6192104 Adams Feb 2001 B1
6195413 Geus Feb 2001 B1
6198795 Naumann Mar 2001 B1
6216540 Nelson Apr 2001 B1
6218943 Ellenbogen Apr 2001 B1
6249567 Rothschild Jun 2001 B1
6252929 Swift Jun 2001 B1
6256369 Lai Jul 2001 B1
6278115 Annis Aug 2001 B1
6282260 Grodzins Aug 2001 B1
6288676 Maloney Sep 2001 B1
6292533 Swift Sep 2001 B1
6301326 Bjorkholm Oct 2001 B2
6320933 Grodzins Nov 2001 B1
6342696 Chadwick Jan 2002 B1
6356620 Rothschild Mar 2002 B1
6359582 MacAleese Mar 2002 B1
6359597 Haj-Yousef Mar 2002 B2
6417797 Cousins Jul 2002 B1
6421420 Grodzins Jul 2002 B1
6424695 Grodzins Jul 2002 B1
6434219 Rothschild Aug 2002 B1
6435715 Betz Aug 2002 B1
6442233 Grodzins Aug 2002 B1
6445765 Frank Sep 2002 B1
6453003 Springer Sep 2002 B1
6453007 Adams Sep 2002 B2
6456093 Merkel Sep 2002 B1
6456684 Mun Sep 2002 B1
6459761 Grodzins Oct 2002 B1
6459764 Chalmers Oct 2002 B1
6469624 Whan Oct 2002 B1
6473487 Le Oct 2002 B1
RE37899 Grodzins Nov 2002 E
6480141 Toth Nov 2002 B1
6483894 Hartick Nov 2002 B2
6501414 Arndt Dec 2002 B2
6507025 Verbinski Jan 2003 B1
6532276 Hartick Mar 2003 B1
6542574 Grodzins Apr 2003 B2
6542578 Ries Apr 2003 B2
6542580 Carver Apr 2003 B1
6546072 Chalmers Apr 2003 B1
6552346 Verbinski Apr 2003 B2
6563903 Kang May 2003 B2
6580778 Meder Jun 2003 B2
6584170 Aust Jun 2003 B2
6597760 Beneke Jul 2003 B2
6606516 Levine Aug 2003 B2
6621888 Grodzins Sep 2003 B2
6628745 Annis Sep 2003 B1
6636581 Sorenson Oct 2003 B2
6650276 Lawless Nov 2003 B2
6653588 Gillard-Hickman Nov 2003 B1
6658087 Chalmers Dec 2003 B2
6663280 Doenges Dec 2003 B2
6665373 Kotowski Dec 2003 B1
6665433 Roder Dec 2003 B2
6705357 Jeon Mar 2004 B2
6735477 Levine May 2004 B2
6763635 Lowman Jul 2004 B1
6765527 Jablonski Jul 2004 B2
6768317 Moeller Jul 2004 B2
6785357 Bernardi Aug 2004 B2
6796944 Hall Sep 2004 B2
6798863 Sato Sep 2004 B2
6812426 Kotowski Nov 2004 B1
6816571 Bijjani Nov 2004 B2
6831590 Steinway Dec 2004 B1
6837422 Meder Jan 2005 B1
6839403 Kotowski Jan 2005 B1
6843599 Le Jan 2005 B2
6856271 Hausner Feb 2005 B1
6856344 Frantz Feb 2005 B2
6876322 Keller Apr 2005 B2
6891381 Bailey May 2005 B2
6894636 Anderton May 2005 B2
6920197 Kang Jul 2005 B2
6922460 Skatter Jul 2005 B2
6928141 Carver Aug 2005 B2
7039159 Muenchau May 2006 B2
7092485 Kravis Aug 2006 B2
7103137 Seppi Sep 2006 B2
7106830 Rosner Sep 2006 B2
7207713 Lowman Apr 2007 B2
7322745 Agrawal Jan 2008 B2
7356115 Ford Apr 2008 B2
7366282 Peschmann Apr 2008 B2
7369643 Kotowski May 2008 B2
7417440 Peschmann Aug 2008 B2
7486768 Allman Feb 2009 B2
7492228 Strange Feb 2009 B2
7505562 Dinca Mar 2009 B2
7551718 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7555099 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7579845 Peschmann Aug 2009 B2
7606348 Foland Oct 2009 B2
7609807 Leue Oct 2009 B2
7702069 Panesar Apr 2010 B2
7720195 Allman May 2010 B2
7831012 Foland Nov 2010 B2
7856081 Peschmann Dec 2010 B2
7864920 Rothschild Jan 2011 B2
7924979 Rothschild Apr 2011 B2
7928400 Diawara Apr 2011 B1
7995705 Allman Aug 2011 B2
7995707 Rothschild Aug 2011 B2
8005189 Ripp Aug 2011 B2
8138770 Peschmann Mar 2012 B2
8213570 Panesar Jul 2012 B2
8385501 Allman Feb 2013 B2
8428217 Peschmann Apr 2013 B2
8442186 Rothschild May 2013 B2
8503606 Rothschild Aug 2013 B2
8674706 Peschmann Mar 2014 B2
8842808 Rothschild Sep 2014 B2
8861684 Al-Kofahi et al. Oct 2014 B2
9042511 Peschmann May 2015 B2
9099279 Rommel Aug 2015 B2
9310322 Panesar Apr 2016 B2
9417060 Schubert Aug 2016 B1
9466456 Rommel Oct 2016 B2
9535019 Rothschild Jan 2017 B1
9823383 Hanley Nov 2017 B2
20020008655 Haj-Yousef Jan 2002 A1
20030009202 Levine Jan 2003 A1
20030068557 Kumashiro Apr 2003 A1
20030179126 Jablonski Sep 2003 A1
20030185340 Frantz Oct 2003 A1
20030216644 Hall Nov 2003 A1
20040077943 Meaney Apr 2004 A1
20040141584 Bernardi Jul 2004 A1
20050058242 Peschmann Mar 2005 A1
20050117700 Peschmann Jun 2005 A1
20050180542 Leue Aug 2005 A1
20060098773 Peschmann May 2006 A1
20060145771 Strange Jul 2006 A1
20080170670 Bhatt Jul 2008 A1
20080230709 Tkaczyk Sep 2008 A1
20090010386 Peschmann Jan 2009 A1
20090285353 Ellenbogen Nov 2009 A1
20100034347 Rothschild Feb 2010 A1
20100295689 Armistead Nov 2010 A1
20110235777 Gozani Sep 2011 A1
20120104276 Miller May 2012 A1
20120300897 Flohr Nov 2012 A1
20130294574 Peschmann Nov 2013 A1
20150177391 Cox Jun 2015 A1
20150325010 Bedford Nov 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2941775 Nov 2015 EP
2299251 Sep 1996 GB
2004010127 Jan 2004 WO
2008135897 Nov 2008 WO
2014107675 Jul 2014 WO
2016011205 Jan 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,256.
Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,089.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/858,479.
Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,089; (pp. 1-9).
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,089; (pp. 1-8).
Sheen, David et al. ‘Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Imaging for Concealed Weapon Detection’, Sep. 2001, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 1581-1592.
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,177.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,177.
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/040653, dated Dec. 16, 2015.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,595.
Supplementary European Search Report for EP14735293, completed on Jul. 11, 2016.
Extended European Search Report for EP14735293, dated Jul. 21, 2016.
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/010370, dated May 13, 2014.
Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,452.
Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,452.
Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,452.
Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,452.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/148,452; (pp. 1-8).
Examination Report for GB1511523.1, dated Oct. 4, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for EP15821498.1, dated Jan. 25, 2018.
Icao: “Lithium Batteries in the Post”, Oct. 21, 2011 (XP55438408, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.icao.int/safety/DangerousGoods/DGP 23 Working Papers/DGP.2.WP.071.5.en.pdf#search=lithium [retrieved on Jan. 5, 2018].
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180292565 A1 Oct 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61749838 Jan 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14148452 Jan 2014 US
Child 15787886 US