The present specification relates to apparatus and methods for scanning a beam of penetrating radiation, and, more particularly, apparatus and methods for scanning a pencil beam over an area to acquire wide field-of-view X-ray images of stationary objects without source rotation.
All practical backscatter X-ray imaging systems are raster scanners, which acquire an image pixel by pixel while moving a well-collimated X-ray beam (also referred to as pencil beam) across the object under inspection. Typically, the sweeping X-ray beam is formed by mechanically moving an aperture in a line in front of a stationary X-ray source. The line is typically a straight line, or nearly so, such that an emergent beam sweeps within a plane, over the course of time. That plane is referred to as a “beam plane.” As the aperture moves along its typically linear path, a resulting X-ray beam sweeps through the system's beam plane across the imaged object, such that an image line may be acquired. An orthogonal image dimension is obtained either by moving the imaged object through the beam plane or by moving the beam plane across the imaged object.
The common conveyer-based inspection systems use the first approach (moving the imaged object through the beam plane). The latter (moving the beam plane across to the object) is suitable for stationary objects. Motion of the beam plane is typically achieved by one of two methods: The imaging system is moved linearly along the imaged object, or else the imaging system turns and thereby sweeps the beam plane over the imaged object in doing so.
A notable exception to the general practice of scanning within a beam plane and moving the beam plane relative to an object is described in U.S. Patent Application No. 20070172031 by Cason and Rothschild, incorporated herein by reference. The application discloses “a beam scanning device comprising: a. a first scanning element constrained to motion solely with respect to a first single axis and having at least one aperture for scanning radiation from inside the first scanning element to outside the first scanning element; and b. a second scanning element constrained to motion solely with respect to a second single axis and having at least one aperture for scanning radiation that has been transmitted through the first scanning element across a region of an inspected object”.
An imaging system for stationary objects that derives one axis of motion from rotation is conceptually simple but rotating the system, or a large part of it, is not only slow (typical image acquisition times would be many seconds) but also becomes mechanically challenging for larger, higher power systems.
Signal-to-noise and spatial resolution considerations dictate that in order to acquire two-dimensional backscatter images in a second or less, the imaging system must typically feature a high line rate and a powerful X-ray source. U.S. Pat. No. 8,576,989, assigned to Rapiscan Systems, Inc. discloses “a beam chopping apparatus, and more specifically, a helical shutter for an electron beam system that is employed in radiation-based scanning systems, and more specifically, a beam chopping apparatus that allows for variability in both velocity and beam spot size by modifying the physical characteristics or geometry of the beam chopper apparatus.”
The highest line rates are achieved by sweeping an electron beam along a linear target and collimating the emitted X-rays with a stationary aperture. Not only can the electron beam be controlled to scan the entire length of the X-ray production target in a fraction of a millisecond, moving the beam fast across the target also distributes heat generated by the impinging electron beam and thus enables focal spots of significantly higher power densities than possible in conventional X-ray tubes.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,260, assigned to American Science & Engineering, Inc. which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses “a hand holdable inspection device for three-dimensional inspection of a volume distal to a surface. The inspection device has a hand-holdable unit including a source of penetrating radiation for providing a beam of specified cross-section and a detector arrangement for detecting penetrating radiation from the beam scattered by the object in the direction of the detector arrangement and for generating a scattered radiation signal.”
Although conventional methods for acquiring a two-dimensional image exist, such methods do not lend themselves to fast scanning or scanning with long collimation lengths. Further, electron beam tubes with sufficiently large two-dimensional transmission targets are technically challenging and have not yet become commercially available. For high-power sources, reflection targets remain the only viable choice that can make electron beam line scanning sources practical.
Having a fast line scanner enables imaging of fast moving objects. However, for acquiring image frames of a stationary object, the beam plane must move at the desired frame rate. For sub-second image frame acquisition times, rotating the entire X-ray source and beam forming assembly is not practical or efficient.
Hence there is need for a novel method and apparatus for acquiring wide field-of-view backscatter X-ray images of stationary objects without rotating the source.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods, which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, and not limiting in scope.
In some embodiments, the present specification may disclose a two-dimensional X-ray scanner comprising: a beam focuser and a beam steerer for scanning an electron beam on a path along an X-ray production target as a function of time; and an aperture adapted for travel in an aperture travel path relative to X-rays emitted by the X-ray production target.
Optionally, the aperture is an intersection of a fixed slit and a moving slit.
Optionally, the moving slit is adapted for rotation within a chopper wheel.
Optionally, the moving slit is aligned radially with respect to rotation of a chopper wheel about an axis.
Optionally, the X-ray production target is enclosed within a snout.
Optionally, the X-ray production target is a planar target block.
Optionally, the X-ray production target is convex.
Optionally, the two-dimensional X-ray scanner is configured to have a predefined take-off angle and wherein, during operation, the electron beam is steered to maintain the pre-defined take-off angle with the travelling aperture.
In some embodiments, the present specification may disclose a method for sweeping an X-ray beam across an object of inspection in two dimensions using a two-dimensional X-ray scanner, the method comprising: varying a direction of a beam of electrons relative to a target upon which the beam of electrons impinges; and coupling X-rays generated at the target via an aperture that moves along a prescribed path as a function of time.
Optionally, coupling X-rays generated at the target may include coupling the X-rays via an intersection of a fixed slit and a moving slit.
Optionally, the moving slit is adapted for rotation within a chopper wheel.
Optionally, the moving slit is aligned radially with respect to rotation of a chopper wheel about an axis.
Optionally, the target is enclosed within a snout.
Optionally, the target is a planar target block.
Optionally, the target is convex. Optionally, the electron beam is steered to maintain a pre-defined take-off angle with the travelling aperture.
Optionally, the two-dimensional X-ray scanner is configured to have a predefined take-off angle and wherein, during operation, the electron beam is steered to maintain the pre-defined take-off angle with the travelling aperture.
In some embodiments, the present specification may disclose a two-dimensional X-ray scanner comprising: a beam steerer for steering an electron beam to impinge upon a target; and a collimator comprising an aperture adapted for travel in an aperture travel path for rotating the electron beam impinging upon the target for emitting an X-ray beam.
Optionally, the aperture is an intersection of a fixed slit and a moving slit adapted for rotation within a chopper wheel.
Optionally, the moving slit is aligned radially with respect to rotation of the chopper wheel about an axis.
Optionally, the target is enclosed within a snout.
Optionally, the target is a planar target block.
Optionally, the target is convex.
Optionally, the electron beam is steered to maintain a pre-defined take-off angle with the travelling aperture.
Optionally, the two-dimensional X-ray scanner is configured to have a predefined take-off angle and wherein, during operation, the electron beam is steered to maintain the pre-defined take-off angle with the travelling aperture.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
In various embodiments, the present specification provides a method and apparatus for acquiring wide field-of-view backscatter X-ray images of stationary objects without rotating the source in an X-ray imaging system.
The following definitions are provided to further describe various aspects of the present specification in some embodiments:
The term “beam angle” refers to an instantaneous exit angle of a beam from a scanning device measured in relation to a center line of the angular beam span. (The beam angle, thus, varies from instant to instant as the beam is scanned.)
The term “snout” is defined as an enclosure that is opaque to the radiation in question and comprises one or more defined openings through which radiation is allowed to emerge.
The term “snout length” is defined as the normal distance between a target where X-rays are generated and an aperture within a snout from where the generated X-rays emerge from the snout. The snout length determines the system's “collimation length” (see below).
The term “collimation length” is defined as the shortest distance between the focal spot on the X-ray production target and an aperture serving to collimate an emergent X-ray beam.
The term “take-off angle” is defined as the angle between the direction of X-ray beam extraction through the aperture and the plane that is tangent to the target surface at the focal spot.
The term “scan head” encompass any structure which contains an X-ray source for two-dimensional scanning, whether by moving the scan head or in accordance with teachings of the present specification.
Where an element is described as being “on,” “connected to,” or “coupled to” another element, it may be directly on, connected or coupled to the other element, or, alternatively, one or more intervening elements may be present, unless otherwise specified.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments and is not intended to be limiting. The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” are intended to include the plural forms as well.
The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the specification. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the specification. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present specification is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the specification have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present specification.
In the description and claims of the application, each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated.
It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
An electromagnetic scanner is now described with reference to
Electrons 105 emerging from gun 101 are steered by focus lens 102 and deflection module 103, governed by beam controller 104, such that electron beam 105 is scanned on a focal path 115 along X-ray production target 110 (also referred to herein as “target” 110). X-rays emitted through aperture 125 during a scan of electron beam 105 lie within a beam plane defined as the unique plane containing the focal path 115 and the aperture 125. If focal path 115 is not a straight line and/or aperture 125 is not a simple aperture but formed by a collimator as taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,117,564 and 9,257,208, both assigned to American Science and Engineering and incorporated herein by reference, then X-rays emitted through aperture 125 during a scan of electron beam 105 lie on a non-planar surface. For simplicity we will still refer to the surface as a beam “plane”.
An inspection object 140 is placed in the path of the beam plane 135. As the scanning X-ray beam 130 traverses the beam plane 135, scattered and/or transmitted X-rays from a scan line 142 are recorded by X-ray detectors (not shown). The inspection object 140 may be imaged by moving it successively along an axis 144 transverse to beam plane 135 while collecting scan lines. This method and apparatus is further described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,045,672, assigned to Watanabe, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Another electromagnetic scanner (EMS) 50 is described with reference to
As described with reference to
The beam plane is turned or rotated incrementally by moving aperture 225. The aperture travel range is designated by the extrema (or outer bounds) ranging from a first end 236 of the beam plane to the second end 237, while the nominal snout length is designated by numeral 280. While in
Referring to
Referring to
In one embodiment of the present specification, aperture 225 is made to travel on an arc with the X-ray production target 210 at its center in order to maintain angular alignment. In an embodiment, the radius of the arc is approximately 12″. In an embodiment, an X-ray transparent floater is used in an arc shaped mercury filled pipe to enable the aperture travel on an arc hydraulically, wherein the mercury blocks the X-rays and the floater forms the aperture.
Since the position of electron beam 105/205 on target 110/210 can be easily controlled using an X-Y deflection module (similar to deflection module 103 shown in
Hence, in various embodiments, by moving the comparably small collimator and not the entire X-ray source, the field of view of an X-ray imaging system can be increased by a factor of 3 or more over that of a conventional, heel-effect-limited X-ray source. This would, however, necessitate a fairly large X-ray exit window and the moving aperture 225 would have to travel linearly 2√{square root over (3)} times the snout length 280. For a 150-mm snout length the aperture 225 would have to travel linearly over a distance of approximately 520 mm to achieve a 120° angular range. If only a 90° angular range is needed, aperture 225 must travel twice the snout length 280. Accordingly, a curved travel path may be preferable.
An embodiment of a two-dimensional scanner, designated generally by numeral 300, is shown in perspective in
Scanning with chopper disk 304 for rotating apertures/slits 302 across X-ray beam window 310 is one way to achieve the moving aperture 225 (shown in
Embodiments of a two-dimensional scanner, in accordance with the foregoing teachings, may advantageously provide fast two dimensional image acquisition, with imaging at a rate of multiple frames per second made possible for the first time. The field of view provided by systems enabled hereby may be multiple times the field of view of a stationary tube system in size. Thus, 120° azimuth is now possible, vs. current limits of 30°-40°.
A stationary two-dimensional scanner in accordance with the foregoing teachings may be particularly useful in situations that require a scanner that is compact in the lateral direction, or where it is important to operate close to the target without risk of accidentally contacting the target, or where movement of the scan head could be problematic for the platform on which the scan head is mounted. Examples, provided without limiting intent, include: inspecting aircraft, where any accidental collision renders the aircraft legally non-airworthy until a certified mechanic can inspect the aircraft to verify that no damage has been done; inspecting suspected improvised explosive devices (IEDs), where any accidental contact could detonate the IED; inspection of IEDs or any other application using a robot mounted imaging system. Space on a robotic vehicle is typically very limited, and a shifting or even rotating scanner might change the center of balance of the entire assembly which can be a problem, particularly on uneven terrain; medical X-ray applications, where the scanner must operate in close proximity to the patient without touching the patient or interfering with medical personnel working on the patient.
Eliminating the need to move the scanner is also helpful in cases where high precision of beam placement is needed. Examples, provided without limiting intent, include: imaging at a distance, where small movements could translate to large position errors of the beam; Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) applications which often require very high resolution; NDT and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) applications which might use the image data for precision measurements of the target. EOD systems might use the measurement results to help aim a disruptor, or for forensic work, in addition to simply detecting the presence of an IED; applications which sum data from multiple repeat ‘frames’ to build up image statistics over a period of time (also likely for NDT or EOD applications).
It should be noted that the formation and scanning of X-ray pencil beam may be employed for any manner of imaging, such as transmission, sidescatter, or backscatter imaging, for example, within the scope of the present specification.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system and method of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present specification have been described herein, it should be understood that the present specification might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the specification. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the specification may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present specification relies on, for priority, U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 62/402,102, entitled “X-Ray Source for 2D Scanning Beam Imaging”, and filed on Sep. 30, 2016, for priority. The above-mentioned application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3678278 | Peil | Jul 1972 | A |
3780291 | Stein | Dec 1973 | A |
3790799 | Stein | Feb 1974 | A |
3843881 | Barton | Oct 1974 | A |
3884816 | Takahashi | May 1975 | A |
3919467 | Peugeot | Nov 1975 | A |
3924064 | Nomura | Dec 1975 | A |
3961186 | Leunbach | Jun 1976 | A |
3971948 | Pfeiler | Jul 1976 | A |
3990175 | Conway | Nov 1976 | A |
4008400 | Brunnett | Feb 1977 | A |
4020346 | Dennis | Apr 1977 | A |
4031545 | Stein | Jun 1977 | A |
4045672 | Watanabe | Aug 1977 | A |
4047035 | Dennhoven | Sep 1977 | A |
4064440 | Roder | Dec 1977 | A |
4070576 | Cobb | Jan 1978 | A |
4107532 | Macovski | Aug 1978 | A |
4112301 | Annis | Sep 1978 | A |
4139771 | Dennhoven | Feb 1979 | A |
4160165 | McCombs | Jul 1979 | A |
4179100 | Sashin | Dec 1979 | A |
4196352 | Berninger | Apr 1980 | A |
4200800 | Swift | Apr 1980 | A |
4228353 | Johnson | Oct 1980 | A |
4228357 | Annis | Oct 1980 | A |
4242583 | Annis | Dec 1980 | A |
4242588 | Huang | Dec 1980 | A |
4260898 | Annis | Apr 1981 | A |
4298800 | Goldman | Nov 1981 | A |
4303830 | Heinzelmann | Dec 1981 | A |
4342914 | Bjorkholm | Aug 1982 | A |
4349739 | Annis | Sep 1982 | A |
4366382 | Kotowski | Dec 1982 | A |
4366576 | Annis | Dec 1982 | A |
4380817 | Harding | Apr 1983 | A |
4389729 | Stein | Jun 1983 | A |
4414682 | Annis | Nov 1983 | A |
4422177 | Mastronardi | Dec 1983 | A |
4426721 | Wang | Jan 1984 | A |
4454605 | Delucia | Jun 1984 | A |
4472822 | Swift | Sep 1984 | A |
4503332 | Annis | Mar 1985 | A |
4514691 | De | Apr 1985 | A |
4525854 | Molbert | Jun 1985 | A |
4535245 | Zonneveld | Aug 1985 | A |
4549307 | Macovski | Oct 1985 | A |
4578806 | Grass | Mar 1986 | A |
4586441 | Zekich | May 1986 | A |
4598415 | Luccio | Jul 1986 | A |
4672837 | Cottrell | Jun 1987 | A |
4692937 | Sashin | Sep 1987 | A |
4711994 | Greenberg | Dec 1987 | A |
4736401 | Donges | Apr 1988 | A |
4745631 | Paolini | May 1988 | A |
4756015 | Doenges | Jul 1988 | A |
4759047 | Donges | Jul 1988 | A |
4768214 | Bjorkholm | Aug 1988 | A |
4783794 | Dietrich | Nov 1988 | A |
4799247 | Annis | Jan 1989 | A |
4807637 | Bjorkholm | Feb 1989 | A |
4809312 | Annis | Feb 1989 | A |
4817121 | Shimizu | Mar 1989 | A |
4819256 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4821023 | Parks | Apr 1989 | A |
4825454 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4839913 | Annis | Jun 1989 | A |
4841555 | Doi | Jun 1989 | A |
4845769 | Burstein | Jul 1989 | A |
4864142 | Gomberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4870670 | Geus | Sep 1989 | A |
4884289 | Glockmann | Nov 1989 | A |
4890310 | Umetani | Dec 1989 | A |
4893015 | Kubierschky | Jan 1990 | A |
4894619 | Leinonen | Jan 1990 | A |
4899283 | Annis | Feb 1990 | A |
4961214 | Van | Oct 1990 | A |
4974247 | Friddell | Nov 1990 | A |
4979137 | Gerstenfeld | Dec 1990 | A |
4995066 | Harding | Feb 1991 | A |
5007072 | Jenkins | Apr 1991 | A |
5022062 | Annis | Jun 1991 | A |
5033073 | Friddell | Jul 1991 | A |
5038370 | Harding | Aug 1991 | A |
5039981 | Rodriguez | Aug 1991 | A |
5044002 | Stein | Aug 1991 | A |
5084619 | Pfeiler | Jan 1992 | A |
5115459 | Bertozzi | May 1992 | A |
5120706 | Weeks | Jun 1992 | A |
5121105 | Aittoniemi | Jun 1992 | A |
5127030 | Annis | Jun 1992 | A |
5132995 | Stein | Jul 1992 | A |
5156270 | Kachel | Oct 1992 | A |
5179581 | Annis | Jan 1993 | A |
5181234 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann | Jan 1993 | A |
5212720 | Landi | May 1993 | A |
5224144 | Annis | Jun 1993 | A |
5243693 | Maron | Sep 1993 | A |
5247561 | Kotowski | Sep 1993 | A |
5253283 | Annis | Oct 1993 | A |
5260982 | Fujii | Nov 1993 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5394454 | Harding | Feb 1995 | A |
5397986 | Conway | Mar 1995 | A |
5420905 | Bertozzi | May 1995 | A |
5430787 | Norton | Jul 1995 | A |
5463224 | Burstein | Oct 1995 | A |
5483569 | Annis | Jan 1996 | A |
5490218 | Krug | Feb 1996 | A |
5493596 | Annis | Feb 1996 | A |
5503424 | Agopian | Apr 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale | Jun 1996 | A |
5528656 | Annis | Jun 1996 | A |
5572121 | Beswick | Nov 1996 | A |
5579360 | Abdel-Mottaleb | Nov 1996 | A |
5590057 | Fletcher | Dec 1996 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5602893 | Harding | Feb 1997 | A |
5638420 | Armistead | Jun 1997 | A |
5642393 | Krug | Jun 1997 | A |
5642394 | Rothschild | Jun 1997 | A |
5660549 | Witt | Aug 1997 | A |
5666393 | Annis | Sep 1997 | A |
5692028 | Geus | Nov 1997 | A |
5692029 | Husseiny | Nov 1997 | A |
5696806 | Grodzins | Dec 1997 | A |
5699400 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5763886 | Schulte | Jun 1998 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5796110 | An | Aug 1998 | A |
5838758 | Krug | Nov 1998 | A |
5882206 | Gillio | Mar 1999 | A |
5892840 | Jang | Apr 1999 | A |
5910973 | Grodzins | Jun 1999 | A |
5930326 | Rothschild | Jul 1999 | A |
5940468 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5966422 | Dafni | Oct 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6044353 | Pugliese | Mar 2000 | A |
6057761 | Yukl | May 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6094472 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6137895 | Al-Sheikh | Oct 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212251 | Tomura | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236709 | Perry | May 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269142 | Smith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272206 | Bjorkholm | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278115 | Annis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282260 | Grodzins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282264 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298603 | Diaz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301326 | Bjorkholm | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6301327 | Martens | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308644 | Diaz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315308 | Konopka | Nov 2001 | B1 |
RE37467 | Brasch | Dec 2001 | E |
6366203 | Burns | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370222 | Cornick | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375697 | Davies | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6393095 | Robinson | May 2002 | B1 |
6418194 | McPherson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421420 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473487 | Le | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484650 | Stomski | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507278 | Brunetti | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553096 | Zhou | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556653 | Hussein | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567496 | Sychev | May 2003 | B1 |
6597760 | Beneke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610977 | Megerle | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621888 | Grodzins | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628745 | Annis | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6634668 | Urffer | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653588 | Gillard-Hickman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665373 | Kotowski | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674367 | Sweatte | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707879 | McClelland | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721391 | McClelland | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6742301 | Schwarz | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6745520 | Puskaric | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749207 | Nadeau | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754304 | Kumakhov | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785360 | Annis | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6819109 | Sowers | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819241 | Turner | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839403 | Kotowski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848826 | Marie | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870791 | Caulfield | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876719 | Ozaki | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879657 | Hoffman | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891381 | Bailey | May 2005 | B2 |
6899540 | Neiderman | May 2005 | B1 |
6901346 | Tracy | May 2005 | B2 |
6911907 | Kelliher | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6952163 | Huey | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965340 | Baharav | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965662 | Eppler | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967612 | Gorman | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970086 | Nelson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970087 | Stis | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990175 | Nakashima | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7053785 | Akins | May 2006 | B2 |
7092485 | Kravis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103137 | Seppi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110493 | Kotowski | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110925 | Pendergraft | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114849 | Atzinger | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142638 | Polichar | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162005 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164747 | Ellenbogen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185206 | Goldstein | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7203276 | Arsenault | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7257189 | Modica | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265709 | Fleisher | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286634 | Sommer | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7305062 | Hambuechen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305063 | Heuscher | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317785 | Zou | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7330529 | Kautzer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333587 | De | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356115 | Ford | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365672 | Keller | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7400701 | Cason | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7418077 | Gray | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7460636 | Ein-Gal | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476023 | Canfield | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7505557 | Modica | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505562 | Dinca | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7551709 | Schlomka | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551715 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561666 | Annis | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7593506 | Cason | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593510 | Rothschild | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7639866 | Pomero | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660388 | Gray | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7684544 | Wilson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7783004 | Kotowski | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796394 | Wang | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796733 | Hughes | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796734 | Mastronardi | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806589 | Tashman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809109 | Mastronardi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817776 | Agrawal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826589 | Kotowski | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8135112 | Hughes | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8576989 | Kaminski | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9117564 | Rommel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9257208 | Rommel | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20020045152 | Viscardi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020094064 | Zhou | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030012338 | Lienard | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030171939 | Yagesh | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198318 | Price | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225612 | Desimone | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229506 | Scott | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040088584 | Shachar | May 2004 | A1 |
20040175018 | MacArthur | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050276379 | Polichar | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060182223 | Heuscher | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262902 | Wattenburg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009088 | Edic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070086564 | Bruder | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098142 | Rothschild | May 2007 | A1 |
20070172031 | Cason | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070235652 | Smith | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090041186 | Gray | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090116614 | Kotowski | May 2009 | A1 |
20090116617 | Mastronardi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090245462 | Agrawal | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257555 | Chalmers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110017917 | Mastronardi | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110096901 | Kotowski | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110164726 | Mastronardi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110274249 | Gray | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110274250 | Gray | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293072 | Kaminski | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299659 | Gray | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120269324 | Adler | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130235977 | Grodzins | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140105367 | Horvarth | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1715895 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1764987 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101379415 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101644687 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101467071 | Jun 2012 | CN |
0261984 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0533316 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1772874 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1772874 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2520927 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2548011 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2548012 | Jan 2013 | EP |
1988000698 | Jan 1988 | WO |
2009006044 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009082762 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009082762 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2011115923 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115930 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115934 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011115935 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US17/54211, dated Jan. 18, 2018. |
ANSI, Radiation Safety for Personnel Security Screening Systems Using X-Rays, Apr. 3, 2002. |
Daniel Strom, “Screening Individuals with Backscatter X-Ray Systems”, Health Physics Society, Feb. 3, 2005. |
Gerald J. Smith, ‘Bodysearch Technology Uses X-ray Imaging to Remove Hazards and Humiliation from Personnel Searches’, IEEE, 1995. |
MSNBC, “Airports Seek Hi-Tech Security”, Apr. 3, 2002. |
Murray et al., “Exploitation of X-Ray Technology for the Detection of Contraband-Aviation Security Applications”, European Conference on Security and Detection, Apr. 28-30, 1997. |
Rapiscan Security Products, Secure 1000 Brochure, 2002. |
Rapiscan Security Products, Secure 1000 Concealed Object Detection System, Nov. 1998. |
Rapiscan Systems Secure 1000 Case Study, London Heathrow Terminal 4, Fall 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180286624 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62402102 | Sep 2016 | US |