The present specification relates generally to the field of X-ray sources and more specifically to the design of anodes for X-ray sources along with cooling of the anodes of X-ray tubes.
Multi-focus X-ray sources generally comprise a single anode, typically in a linear or arcuate geometry, that may be irradiated at discrete points along its length by high energy electron beams from a multi-element electron source. Such multi-focus X-ray sources can be used in tomographic imaging systems or projection X-ray imaging systems where it is necessary to move the X-ray beam.
When electrons strike the anode they lose some, or all, of their kinetic energy, the majority of which is released as heat. This heat can reduce the target lifetime and it is therefore common to cool the anode. Conventional methods include air cooling, wherein the anode is typically operated at ground potential with heat conduction to ambient through an air cooled heatsink, and a rotating anode, wherein the irradiated point is able to cool as it rotates around before being irradiated once more.
However, there is need for improved anode designs for X-ray tubes that are easy to fabricate while providing enhanced functionality, such as collimation by the anode. There is also need for improved systems for cooling anodes.
In some embodiments, the present specification discloses an anode for an X-ray tube comprising a source of electrons and multiple channels, each channel comprising: a target defined by a plane; an electron aperture through which electrons from the source of electrons pass to strike said target, wherein said electron aperture comprises side walls, each of said side walls having a surface, and a central axis; and a collimating aperture through which X-rays produced at the target pass out of the anode as a collimated beam, wherein said collimating aperture comprises side walls, each of said side walls having a surface, and a central axis and wherein at least a portion of the surfaces of the side walls of the electron aperture and the surfaces of the side walls of the collimating aperture are lined with an electron absorbing material.
In some embodiments, the electron absorbing material is adapted to absorb any electrons straying from a predefined trajectory. Optionally, the electron absorbing material has a low atomic number. Optionally, the electron absorbing material has a high melting point. Optionally, the electron absorbing material is stable in a vacuum. Optionally, the electron absorbing material is graphite. Optionally, a thickness of the graphite is 0.1 to 2 mm. Optionally, the electron absorbing material is boron. Optionally, the electron absorbing material is titanium.
Optionally, the plane of the target is positioned at an angle relative to a horizontal axis passing through a center of the collimating aperture. Optionally, the angle of the plane of the target relative to a horizontal axis passing through the center of the collimating aperture ranges from 5 degrees to 60 degrees. Optionally, the angle of the plane of the target relative to a horizontal axis passing through the center of the collimating aperture is 30 degrees. Optionally, the plane of the target and the central axis of the collimating aperture are adapted to intersect in a manner that forms an angle, wherein said angle is in a range of 10 degrees to 50 degrees. Optionally, said angle is 30 degrees.
Optionally, the plane of the target is positioned at an angle relative to a vertical axis passing through a center of the electron aperture. Optionally, the angle of the plane the target relative to a vertical axis passing through the center of the electron aperture ranges from 5 degrees to 60 degrees. Optionally, the angle of the plane of the target relative to a vertical axis passing through the center of the electron aperture is 30 degrees.
Optionally, the electron absorbing material on at least a portion of the wall of the electron aperture extends through to block an X-ray beam exit path or collimating aperture. Optionally, the electron absorbing material on the walls of the electron aperture is approximately 1 mm away from a region of the target that is directly irradiated by the electronics.
Optionally, the plane of the target and the central axis of the electron aperture are adapted to intersect in a manner that forms an angle, wherein said angle is in a range of 10 degrees to 50 degrees. Still optionally, said angle is 30 degrees.
Optionally, the central axis of the electron aperture and central axis of the collimating aperture are adapted to intersect in a manner that forms an angle, wherein said angle is in a range of 70 degrees to 110 degrees. Still optionally, said angle is 90 degrees.
It is an object of the present specification to provide an anode for an X-ray tube comprising a target arranged to produce X-rays when electrons are incident upon it, the anode defining an X-ray aperture through which the X-rays from the target are arranged to pass thereby to be at least partially collimated by the anode.
Accordingly, the anode may be formed in two parts, and the X-ray aperture can conveniently be defined between the two parts. This enables simple manufacture of the anode. The two parts are preferably arranged to be held at a common electrical potential.
In one embodiment a plurality of target regions are defined whereby X-rays can be produced independently from each of the target regions by causing electrons to be incident upon it. This makes the anode suitable for use, for example, in X-ray tomography scanning. In this case the X-ray aperture may be one of a plurality of X-ray apertures, each arranged so that X-rays from a respective one of the target regions can pass through it.
In one embodiment the anode further defines an electron aperture through which electrons can pass to reach the target. Indeed the present specification further provides an anode for an X-ray tube comprising a target arranged to produce X-rays when electrons are incident upon it, the anode defining an electron aperture through which electrons can pass to reach the target.
In one embodiment the parts of the anode defining the electron aperture are arranged to be at substantially equal electrical potential. This can result in zero electric field within the electron aperture so that electrons are not deflected by transverse forces as they pass through the electron aperture. In one embodiment the anode is shaped such that there is substantially zero electric field component perpendicular to the direction of travel of the electrons as they approach the anode. In some embodiments the anode has a surface which faces in the direction of incoming electrons and in which the electron aperture is formed, and said surface is arranged to be perpendicular to the said direction.
In one embodiment the electron aperture has sides which are arranged to be substantially parallel to the direction of travel of electrons approaching the anode. In one embodiment the electron aperture defines an electron beam direction in which an electron beam can travel to reach the target, and the target has a target surface arranged to be impacted by electrons in the beam, and the electron beam direction is at an angle of 10° or less, more preferably 5° or less, to the target surface.
It is also an object of the present specification to provide an anode for an X-ray tube comprising at least one thermally conductive anode segment in contact with a rigid backbone and cooling means arranged to cool the anode.
In one embodiment the anode claim further comprises cooling means arranged to cool the anode. For example the cooling means may comprise a coolant conduit arranged to carry coolant through the anode. In one embodiment, the anode comprises a plurality of anode segments aligned end to end. This enables an anode to be built of a greater length than would easily be achieved using a single piece anode. Preferably the anode comprises two parts and the coolant conduit is provided in a channel defined between the two parts.
Each anode segment may be coated with a thin film. The thin film may coat at least an exposed surface of the anode segment and may comprise a target metal. For example, the film may be a film of any one of tungsten, molybdenum, uranium and silver. Application of the metal film onto the surface of the anode may be by any one of sputter coating, electro deposition and chemical deposition. Alternatively, a thin metal foil may be brazed onto the anode segment. The thin film may have a thickness of between 30 microns and 1000 microns, preferably between 50 microns and 500 microns.
In one embodiment, the anode segments are formed from a material with a high thermal conductivity such as copper. The rigid backbone may preferably be formed from stainless steel. The excellent thermal matching of copper and stainless steel means that large anode segments may be fabricated with little distortion under thermal cycling and with good mechanical stability.
The plurality of anode segments may be bolted onto the rigid backbone. Alternatively, the rigid backbone may be crimped into the anode segments using a mechanical press. Crimping reduces the number of mechanical processes required and removes the need for bolts, which introduce the risk of gas being trapped at the base of the bolts.
The integral cooling channel may extend along the length of the backbone and may either be cut into the anode segments or into the backbone. Alternatively, the channel may be formed from aligned grooves cut into both the anode segments and the backbone. A cooling tube may extend along the cooling channel and may contain cooling fluid. Preferably, the tube is an annealed copper tube. The cooling channel may have a square or rectangular cross section or, alternatively, may have a semi-circular or substantially circular cross section. A rounded cooling channel allows better contact between the cooling tube and the anode and therefore provides more efficient cooling.
The cooling fluid may be passed into the anode through an insulated pipe section. The insulated pipe section may comprise two ceramic tubes with brazed end caps, connected at one end to a stainless steel plate. This stainless steel plate may then be mounted into the X-ray tube vacuum housing. The ceramic tubes may be connected to the cooling channel by two right-angle pipe joints and may be embedded within the anode.
The present specification further provides an X-ray tube including an anode according to the specification.
The present specification is also directed to an anode for an X-ray tube comprising an electron aperture through which electrons emitted from an electron source travel subject to substantially no electrical field and a target in a non-parallel relationship to said electron aperture and arranged to produce X-rays when electrons are incident upon a first side of said target, wherein said target further comprises a cooling channel located on a second side of said target. The cooling channel comprises a conduit having coolant contained therein. The coolant is at least one of water, oil, or refrigerant.
The target comprises more than one target segment, wherein each of said target segments is in a non-parallel relationship to said electron aperture and arranged to produce X-rays when electrons are incident upon a first side of said target segment, wherein each of said target segments further comprises a cooling channel located on a second side of said target segment. The second sides of each of said target segments are attached to a backbone. The backbone is a rigid, single piece of metal, such as stainless steel. At least one of said target segments is connected to said backbone using a bolt. At least one of said target segments is connected to said backbone by placing said backbone within crimped protrusions formed on the second side of said target segment. Each of the target segments is held at a high voltage positive electrical potential with respect to said electron source. The first side of each of the target segments is coated with a target metal, wherein said target metal is at least one of molybdenum, tungsten, silver, metal foil, or uranium. The backbone is made of stainless steel and said target segments are made of copper. The conduit is electrically insulated and the cooling channel has at least one of a square, rectangular, semi-circular, or flattened semi-circular cross-section.
In another embodiment, the present specification is directed toward an X-ray tube comprising an anode further comprising at least one electron aperture through which electrons emitted from an electron source travel subject to substantially no electrical field, a target in a non-parallel relationship to said electron aperture and arranged to produce X-rays when electrons are incident upon a first side of said target, wherein said target further comprises a cooling channel located on a second side of said target, and at least one of aperture comprising an X-ray aperture through which the X-rays from the target pass through, and are at least partially collimated by, the X-ray aperture. The cooling channel comprises a conduit having coolant contained therein, such as water, oil, or refrigerant.
The target comprises more than one target segment, wherein each of said target segments is in a non-parallel relationship to said electron aperture and arranged to produce X-rays when electrons are incident upon a first side of said target segment, wherein each of said target segments further comprises a cooling channel located on a second side of said target segment. The second sides of each of said target segments are attached to a backbone. At least one of said target segments is connected to said backbone by a) a bolt or b) placing said backbone within crimped protrusions formed on the second side of said target segment. Each of the target segments is held at a high voltage positive electrical potential with respect to said electron source.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be appreciated as they become better understood by reference to the following Detailed Description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
Referring to both
In this embodiment, the provision of a number of separate apertures through the anode 14, each of which can be aligned with a respective electron source element, allows good control of the X-ray beam produced from each of the target regions 20a. This is because the anode can provide collimation of the X-ray beam in two perpendicular directions. The target region 20 is aligned with the electron aperture 36 so that electrons passing along the electron aperture 36 will impact the target region 20. The two X-ray collimating surfaces 28, 32 are angled slightly to each other so that they define between them an X-ray aperture 38 which widens slightly in the direction of travel of the X-rays away from the target region 20. The target region 20, which lies between the electron aperture surface 30 and the X-ray collimating surface 28 on the main anode part 18 faces the region 40 of the collimating part 22. Electron aperture surface 34 and X-ray collimating surface 32 meet at the region 40.
Adjacent the outer end 36a of the electron aperture 36, the surface 42 is substantially flat and perpendicular to the electron aperture surfaces 30, 34 and the direction of travel of the incoming electrons. Surface 42 faces the incoming electrons and is made up on one side of the electron aperture 36 by the main part 18 and on the other side by the collimating part 22. This means that the electrical field in the path of the electrons between the source elements 12 (shown in
In use, each of the source elements 12 is activated in turn to project a beam 44 of electrons at a respective area of the target region 20. The use of successive source elements 12 and successive areas of the target region enables the position of the X-ray source to be scanned along the anode 14 in the longitudinal direction perpendicular to the direction of the incoming electron beams and the X-ray beams. As the electrons move in the region between the source 12 and the anode 14 they are accelerated in a straight line by the electric field which is substantially straight and parallel to the required direction of travel of the electrons. Once the electrons enter the electron aperture 36 they encounter a region of zero electric field up to the point of impact with the target 20. Therefore, throughout the length of the path of the electrons within anode 14, the electrons are not subjected to any electric field having a component perpendicular to the direction of travel. However, in an embodiment, electrical field(s) may be provided to focus the electron beam. Hence, the path of the electrons as they approach the target 20 is substantially straight, and is unaffected by, for example, the potentials of the anode 14 and source 12, and the angle of the target 20 to the electron trajectory.
When the electron beam 44 hits the target 20 some of the electrons produce fluorescent radiation at X-ray energies. The produced radiation is radiated from the target 20 over a broad range of angles. However the anode 14, being made of a metallic material, provides a high attenuation of X-rays, so that only the X-rays that leave the target 20 in the direction of the collimating aperture 38 avoid being absorbed within the anode 14. The anode 14, therefore, produces a collimated beam of X-rays, the shape of which is defined by the shape of the collimating aperture 38. In an embodiment, further collimation of the X-ray beam may also be provided, by using conventional means external to the anode 14.
Some of the electrons in the beam 44 are backscattered from the target 20. Backscattered electrons normally travel to the tube envelope where they can create localized heating of the tube envelope or build up surface charge that can lead to tube discharge. Both of these effects can lead to reduction in lifetime of the tube. In various embodiments, electrons backscattered from the target 20 may interact with the collimating part 22 or the main part 18 of the anode 14. However, since, the energetic electrons are absorbed back into the anode 14, excess heating, or surface charging of the tube envelope 16 is prevented. The backscattered electrons typically have a lower energy than the incident (full energy) electrons and are more likely to result in lower energy bremsstrahlung radiation than fluorescence radiation. In embodiments, any bremsstrahlung radiation produced is also absorbed within the anode 14.
With reference to
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The anode segments 605 are formed from a metal such as copper and are held at a high voltage positive electrical potential with respect to an electron source. Each anode segment 605 has an angled front face 625, which is coated with a suitable target metal such as molybdenum, tungsten, silver or uranium selected to produce the required X rays when electrons are incident upon it. This layer of target metal is applied to the front surface 625 using any suitable methods, such as but not limited to, sputter coating, electrodeposition and chemical vapor deposition. Alternatively, a thin metal foil with a thickness of 50-500 microns is brazed onto the copper anode surface 625.
Referring to
In one embodiment the rigid single piece backbone 610 is formed from stainless steel and can be made using mechanically accurate and inexpensive processes such as laser cutting while the smaller copper anode segments 605 are typically fabricated using automated machining processes. The backbone 610 is formed with a flat front face and the anode segments 605 are formed with flat rear faces to ensure good thermal contact between them when these flat faces are in contact. Due to the excellent thermal matching of copper and stainless steel and good vacuum properties of both materials, large anode segments having good mechanical stability and minimal distortion under thermal cycling may be fabricated.
The bolts 611 fixing the anode segments 605 onto the backbone 610 pass through bores that extend from a rear face of the backbone, passing through to a front face of the backbone 610, and into threaded blind bores in the anode segments 605. During assembly of the anode 600, there is potential for gas pockets to be trapped around the base of these bolts 611. Small holes or slots may therefore be cut into the backbone or anode to connect these holes to the outer surface of the backbone or anode, allowing escape of the trapped pockets of gas.
In accordance with an aspect of the present specification, bolting a number of anode segments 605 onto a single backbone 610, as shown in
In use, the anode segments 905 are held at a relatively high electrical potential. Any sharp points on the anode can therefore lead to a localized high build up of electrostatic charge and result in electrostatic discharge. Crimping the straight copper walls 909 of the anode segments 905 around the backbone 910 provides the anode segments with rounded edges and avoids the need for fasteners such as bolts. This helps to ensure an even distribution of charge over the anode and reduces the likelihood of electrostatic discharge from the anode.
Since the anode is often operated at positive high voltage with respect to ground potential, in order to pass the coolant fluid into the anode it is often necessary to use an electrically insulated pipe section. Non-conducting tube sections (such as those made of ceramic) may be used to provide an electrically isolated connection between coolant tubes and an external supply of coolant fluid. The coolant fluid is pumped through the ceramic tubes into the coolant tube, removing the heat generated as X-rays are produced.
In order to maximize the electrostatic performance of the anode 600 of
Alternatively, in an embodiment, the pipe section may be connected to a crimped anode from outside of the anode. Referring to
While the presence of copper in the target (high Z material) attenuates X-rays that are not generated in the required beam path, a low atomic number (for example, graphite) lining is employed to attenuate the electrons that either stray from the main electron beam path from the filament to target or that are backscattered from the target. Thus, in an embodiment, the present specification provides for lining the walls of electron apertures and/or collimating apertures of an anode with a material, such as graphite, for absorbing any stray or backscattered electrons and low energy X-rays. Graphite is advantageous in that it stops backscattered electrons but is inefficient at generating X-rays or attenuating the X-rays that are produced from a designated part of the anode. Electrons having an energy of approximately 160 kV have a travel range of 0.25 mm within graphite. Hence, in an embodiment, a graphite lining, having a thickness ranging from 0.1 mm to 2 mm, is used to prevent any electrons from passing through. Graphite is both electrically conductive and refractory and can withstand very high temperatures during processing or operation. Further, X-ray generation in the graphite lining (either by incident or backscattered electrons) is minimized due to the low atomic number (Z) of graphite (Z=6). The shielding properties of graphite are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/930,293, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
It should be noted herein that any material that has properties similar to graphite that achieve the intended purpose may be used in the anode structures of the present specification. In other embodiments, materials such as boron or titanium that are characterized by low atomic number, high melting point (refractory) and stable performance in a vacuum may be used for lining the channels of the anode of the present specification. It should be noted herein and understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that considerations for material choice may also include cost and manufacturability.
Referring to
As shown in
The relative dimensions of the directionality of the apertures and target surface are largely application dependent. In an embodiment, the ratio of width to height of electron aperture 1206 is on the order of 1 or greater (i.e. at least square and in some embodiments, rectangular). The ratio of length to width of electron aperture 1206 is also application dependent. In an embodiment, for cone beam systems, the ratio of length to width for electron aperture 1206 is approximately 1. In an embodiment, for fan beam systems, the ratio of length to width for electron aperture 1206 is approximately 100.
In embodiments, the surface of target 1207 forms an angle 1221 with respect to a horizontal axis 1225 passing through the center of collimating aperture 1208. In other words, an axis line 1225 passing through the center of the collimating aperture 1208 would intersect with the plane defined by the surface of the target 1207 in a manner that forms an angle where the angle has a range from 6 degrees to 50 degrees, preferably 30 degrees. The choice of angle is determined by many factors, including, but not limited to fan beam angle, cone beam angle, spectral quality variation across the beam, and effective focal spot size. It should be noted that a horizontal axis line through the center of the collimating aperture is chosen to provide reference however, the embodiments of the present specification may also be described with reference to a vertical axis line through the center of the electron aperture.
In one embodiment, an axis line 1220 passing through the center of the electron aperture 1206 would intersect with the axis line 1225 passing through the center of the collimating aperture 1208 in a manner that forms an angle where the angle has a range from 70 degrees to 110 degrees, preferably 90 degrees 1222.
Optionally, the graphite layer on wall 1202 extends through to block the X-ray beam exit path, but does not block the electron beam path from the electron gun to the target. The solid angle subtended by the graphite lined region is as large as possible to the electrons backscattered from the target. In order to maximize solid angle, the graphite region is as close to the target region as possible while far away enough to avoid the main electron beam. Thus, in an embodiment, the graphite region is approximately 1 mm away from the region of the target that is directly irradiated by the electronics. It should be noted herein that target surface 1207 does not have a graphite lining.
In an embodiment, each anode comprises one collimated electron aperture per electron gun. Therefore in systems where only a single electron gun is employed, only one electron and collimating aperture exists. In multi-focus systems, such as that described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/588,732, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, there may be hundreds of apertures.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present specification have been described herein, it should be understood that the present specification might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the specification. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the specification may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0309374.7 | Apr 2003 | GB | national |
0812864.7 | Jul 2008 | GB | national |
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/635,814, entitled “X-Ray Sources Having Reduced Electron Scattering” and filed on Mar. 2, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/313,854, of the same title, and filed on Dec. 7, 2011, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,001,973, which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/478,757 (the '757 Application), filed on Jun. 4, 2009, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,094,784, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/364,067, filed on Feb. 2, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/033,035, filed on Feb. 19, 2008, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/554,569, filed on Oct. 25, 2005, which is a national stage application of PCT/GB2004/001732, filed on Apr. 23, 2004 and which, in turn, relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number 0309374.7, filed on Apr. 25, 2003, for priority. The '757 Application also relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number 0812864.7, filed on Jul. 15, 2008, for priority. The present specification also relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/930,293, entitled “A Graphite Backscattered Electron Shield for Use in An X-Ray Tube”, and filed on Sep. 9, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/674,086, of the same title, and filed on Nov. 11, 2012, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,208,988, which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/792,931, of the same title and filed on Jun. 3, 2010, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,331,535, which, in turn, relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/183,581, filed on Jun. 3, 2009, for priority. The present specification also relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/312,525, filed on Jun. 23, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/063,467, filed on May 25, 2011, which, in turn, is a national stage application of PCT/GB2009/051178, filed on Sep. 13, 2008, and which further relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number 0816823.9, filed on Sep. 11, 2009, for priority. The present specification also relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/988,002, filed on Jan. 5, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/054,066, filed on Oct. 5, 2011, which is a 371 National Stage application of PCT/GB2009/001760, filed on Jul. 15, 2009, while relies on Great Britain Patent Application Number 0812864.7, filed on Jul. 15, 2008, for priority. All of the aforementioned applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2101143 | Laidig | Dec 1937 | A |
2333525 | Cox | Nov 1943 | A |
2842694 | Hosemann | Jul 1958 | A |
2952790 | Steen | Sep 1960 | A |
3138729 | Henke | Jun 1964 | A |
3239706 | Farrell | Mar 1966 | A |
3610994 | Sheldon | Oct 1971 | A |
3768645 | Conway | Oct 1973 | A |
3867637 | Braun | Feb 1975 | A |
4045672 | Watanabe | Aug 1977 | A |
4057725 | Wagner | Nov 1977 | A |
4064411 | Iwasaki | Dec 1977 | A |
4105922 | Lambert | Aug 1978 | A |
4165472 | Wittry | Aug 1979 | A |
4171254 | Koenecke | Oct 1979 | A |
4228353 | Johnson | Oct 1980 | A |
4238706 | Yoshihara | Dec 1980 | A |
4241404 | Lux | Dec 1980 | A |
4259721 | Kuznia | Mar 1981 | A |
4266425 | Allport | May 1981 | A |
4274005 | Yamamura | Jun 1981 | A |
4309637 | Fetter | Jan 1982 | A |
4340816 | Schott | Jul 1982 | A |
4344011 | Hayashi | Aug 1982 | A |
4352021 | Boyd | Sep 1982 | A |
4352196 | Gabbay | Sep 1982 | A |
4405876 | Iversen | Sep 1983 | A |
4420382 | Riedl | Dec 1983 | A |
4461020 | Hubner | Jul 1984 | A |
4468802 | Friedel | Aug 1984 | A |
4531226 | Peschmann | Jul 1985 | A |
4622687 | Whitaker | Nov 1986 | A |
4625324 | Blaskis | Nov 1986 | A |
4670895 | Penato | Jun 1987 | A |
4672649 | Rutt | Jun 1987 | A |
4675890 | Plessis | Jun 1987 | A |
4677651 | Hartl | Jun 1987 | A |
4719645 | Yamabe | Jan 1988 | A |
4736400 | Koller | Apr 1988 | A |
4763345 | Barbaric | Aug 1988 | A |
RE32961 | Wagner | Jun 1989 | E |
4866745 | Akai | Sep 1989 | A |
4868856 | Frith | Sep 1989 | A |
4887604 | Shefer | Dec 1989 | A |
4894775 | Kritchman | Jan 1990 | A |
4928296 | Kadambi | May 1990 | A |
4945562 | Staub | Jul 1990 | A |
4991194 | Laurent | Feb 1991 | A |
5018181 | Iversen | May 1991 | A |
5033106 | Kita | Jul 1991 | A |
5056127 | Iversen | Oct 1991 | A |
5065418 | Bermbach | Nov 1991 | A |
5068882 | Eberhard | Nov 1991 | A |
5073910 | Eberhard | Dec 1991 | A |
5091924 | Bermbach | Feb 1992 | A |
5091927 | Golitzer | Feb 1992 | A |
5138308 | Clerc | Aug 1992 | A |
5144191 | Jones et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5159234 | Wegmann | Oct 1992 | A |
5191600 | Vincent | Mar 1993 | A |
5195112 | Vincent | Mar 1993 | A |
5247556 | Eckert | Sep 1993 | A |
5259014 | Brettschneider | Nov 1993 | A |
5268955 | Burke | Dec 1993 | A |
5272627 | Maschhoff | Dec 1993 | A |
5305363 | Burke | Apr 1994 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5329180 | Popli | Jul 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5375156 | Kuo-Petravic | Dec 1994 | A |
5414622 | Walters | May 1995 | A |
5467377 | Dawson | Nov 1995 | A |
5511104 | Mueller | Apr 1996 | A |
5515414 | dAchardVanEnschut | May 1996 | A |
5541975 | Anderson | Jul 1996 | A |
5568829 | Crawford | Oct 1996 | A |
5596621 | Schwarz | Jan 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5604778 | Polacin | Feb 1997 | A |
5616926 | Shinada | Apr 1997 | A |
5633907 | Gravelle | May 1997 | A |
5654995 | Flohr | Aug 1997 | A |
5680432 | Voss | Oct 1997 | A |
5689541 | Schardt | Nov 1997 | A |
5712889 | Lanzara | Jan 1998 | A |
5798972 | Lao | Aug 1998 | A |
5841831 | Hell | Nov 1998 | A |
5859891 | Hibbard | Jan 1999 | A |
5879807 | Inoue | Mar 1999 | A |
5889833 | Silver | Mar 1999 | A |
5907593 | Hsieh | May 1999 | A |
5966422 | Dafni | Oct 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
5987097 | Salasoo | Nov 1999 | A |
6014419 | Hu | Jan 2000 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6075836 | Ning | Jun 2000 | A |
6088426 | Miller | Jul 2000 | A |
6108575 | Besson | Aug 2000 | A |
6122343 | Pidcock | Sep 2000 | A |
6130502 | Kobayashi | Oct 2000 | A |
6181765 | Sribar | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183139 | Solomon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188747 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218943 | Ellenbogen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229870 | Morgan | May 2001 | B1 |
6236709 | Perry | May 2001 | B1 |
6240157 | Danielsson | May 2001 | B1 |
6269142 | Smith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6298110 | Ning | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324243 | Edic | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324249 | Fazzio | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341154 | Besson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6404230 | Cairns | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430260 | Snyder | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449331 | Nutt | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470065 | Lauther | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480571 | Andrews | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6553096 | Zhou | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556653 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6580780 | Miller | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6624425 | Nisius | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6674838 | Barrett | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6735271 | Naidu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751293 | Barrett | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760407 | Fessler | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6785359 | Lemaitre | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819742 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6975703 | Katcha | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6993115 | Georgeson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7079624 | Miller | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7184520 | Sano | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7192031 | Ying | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197116 | Dunham | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203269 | Huber | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203282 | Brauss | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218700 | Muenchau | May 2007 | B2 |
7233644 | Bendahan | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7248673 | Miller | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7349525 | Morton | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7466799 | Miller | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7508916 | Frontera | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7664230 | Morton | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697665 | Yonezawa | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7728397 | Gorrell | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738632 | Popescu | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8094784 | Morton | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8243876 | Morton | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8331535 | Morton | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8654924 | Behling | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010022346 | Katagami et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010033635 | Katagami | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020031202 | Callerame | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020082492 | Grzeszczuk | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094064 | Zhou | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097836 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020176531 | McClelland | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020140336 | Stoner | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030021377 | Turner | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031352 | Turner | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043957 | Pelc | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048868 | Bailey | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076921 | Mihara | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076924 | Mario | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091148 | Bittner | May 2003 | A1 |
20040120454 | Seppi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021623 | Nicolas | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022292 | Morton | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057554 | Bjorkholm | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066879 | Machida | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094064 | Taguchi | May 2004 | A1 |
20040213378 | Ellenbogen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040202282 | Miller | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040252807 | Skatter | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040258305 | Burnham | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002492 | Rother | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031075 | Hopkins | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053189 | Gohno | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058242 | Peschmann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105682 | Heumann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100135 | Lowman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111610 | DeMan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157925 | Lorenz | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123092 | Mistretta | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050175151 | Dunham | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050276377 | Carol | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276382 | Lesiak | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060050842 | Wang | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060233297 | Ishiyama | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070053495 | Seppi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064873 | Gabioud | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070172023 | Morton | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183575 | Lemaitre | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070297570 | Kerpershoek | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019483 | Andrews | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043920 | Liu | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056436 | Pack | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080056437 | Pack | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069420 | Zhang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080112540 | Rogers | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123803 | DeMan | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130974 | Xu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090022264 | Zhou | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090086898 | Richardson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090097836 | Tanaka | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090159451 | Tomantschger | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185660 | Zou | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100046716 | Freudenberger | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100098219 | Vermilyea | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111265 | Holm | May 2010 | A1 |
20100246754 | Morton | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100316192 | Hauttmann | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007876 | Morton | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110188725 | Yu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110222662 | Behling | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130156161 | Andrews | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130195253 | Andrews | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1138743 | Dec 1996 | CN |
1172952 | Feb 1998 | CN |
1194718 | Sep 1998 | CN |
1316827 | Oct 2001 | CN |
1795527 | Jun 2006 | CN |
2729353 | Jan 1979 | DE |
3638378 | May 1988 | DE |
3840398 | Jun 1989 | DE |
4432205 | Jan 1996 | DE |
4425691 | Feb 1996 | DE |
19745998 | Mar 1999 | DE |
10036210 | Nov 2001 | DE |
10319547 | Nov 2004 | DE |
10319549 | Dec 2004 | DE |
0142249 | May 1985 | EP |
0432568 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0531993 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0584871 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0924742 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0930046 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1277439 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1374776 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1558142 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2328280 | May 1977 | FR |
2675629 | Oct 1992 | FR |
1149796 | Apr 1969 | GB |
1272498 | Apr 1972 | GB |
1497396 | Jan 1978 | GB |
1526041 | Sep 1978 | GB |
2015245 | Sep 1979 | GB |
2089109 | Jun 1982 | GB |
2212903 | Aug 1989 | GB |
2212975 | Aug 1989 | GB |
2360405 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2360405 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2418529 | Mar 2006 | GB |
50081080 | Jul 1975 | JP |
S51055286 | May 1976 | JP |
S51078696 | Jul 1976 | JP |
S52050186 | Apr 1977 | JP |
S52124890 | Oct 1977 | JP |
S5493993 | Jul 1979 | JP |
S55046408 | Apr 1980 | JP |
56086448 | Jul 1981 | JP |
S56167464 | Dec 1981 | JP |
S5717524 | Jan 1982 | JP |
S57110854 | Jul 1982 | JP |
570175247 | Oct 1982 | JP |
S57175247 | Oct 1982 | JP |
58212045 | Dec 1983 | JP |
590016254 | Jan 1984 | JP |
S591625 | Jan 1984 | JP |
S5916254 | Jan 1984 | JP |
59075549 | Apr 1984 | JP |
S5975549 | Apr 1984 | JP |
600015546 | Jan 1985 | JP |
S601554 | Jan 1985 | JP |
600021440 | Feb 1985 | JP |
S6038957 | Feb 1985 | JP |
S60021440 | Feb 1985 | JP |
S60181851 | Dec 1985 | JP |
61107642 | May 1986 | JP |
62044940 | Feb 1987 | JP |
S62121773 | Aug 1987 | JP |
63016535 | Jan 1988 | JP |
1296544 | Nov 1989 | JP |
03198975 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H0479128 | Mar 1992 | JP |
H04319237 | Nov 1992 | JP |
H05135721 | Jun 1993 | JP |
H05182617 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H05290768 | Nov 1993 | JP |
060038957 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H0638957 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06162974 | Jun 1994 | JP |
H06261895 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H07093525 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H09171788 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H10211196 | Aug 1998 | JP |
H10272128 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H11500229 | Jan 1999 | JP |
H11273597 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000175895 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001023557 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001502473 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001176408 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001204723 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002343291 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003092076 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003121392 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003126075 | May 2003 | JP |
2003257347 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004000605 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004079128 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004311245 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004357724 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005013768 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006128137 | May 2006 | JP |
2006351272 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007265981 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008166059 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2010060572 | Mar 2010 | JP |
100211196 | Sep 2010 | JP |
1022236 | Jun 1983 | SU |
9528715 | Oct 1995 | WO |
9718462 | May 1997 | WO |
9960387 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2002031857 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03051201 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004010127 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004042769 | May 2004 | WO |
2004097386 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004097888 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004097889 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2006130630 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2006130630 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007068933 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008068691 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009012453 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009012453 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2010007375 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010086653 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010141659 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 5,987,079 A, 11/1999, Scott (withdrawn) |
Morton, E.J., 2010, “Position sensitive detectors in security: Users perspective”, Invited talk, STFC meeting on position sensitive detectors, RAL, May 2010. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/739,833. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2004/001729, dated Aug. 12, 2004, Rapiscan Systems, Inc. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2004/001732, dated Feb. 25, 2005. |
Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. CN200980144807X, dated Oct. 12, 2015. |
Examination Report for GB1120237.1, dated Aug. 13, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/146,645. |
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/146,645. |
STMicroelectronics, “Dual Full-Bridge Driver”, Datasheet for L298, 2000, pp. 1-13, XP002593095. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2010/41871, dated Oct. 4, 2010, Rapiscan Systems, Inc. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/405,117. |
European Search Opinion, Application No. EP10784058, dated Dec. 18, 2013, Publication No. EP2438212. |
Supplementary European Search Report, EP10784058, dated Dec. 6, 2013. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for EP10784058, dated Aug. 21, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report for EP15174771, CXR Limited, dared Sep. 28, 2015. |
Bruder et al. “Efficient Extended Field of View (eFOV) Reconstructuion Techniques for Multi-Slice Helical CT”, Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging, edited by Jiang Hsieh, Ehsan Samei, Proc. of SPIE vol. 6913, 69132E, (2008). |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200980114807.X, Second Office Action, dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
Great Britain Patent Application No. GB0816823.9, Search Report, dated Oct. 20, 2009. |
Great Britain Patent Application No. GB1104148.0, Examination Report, dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2004/001731, dated May 27, 2005. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2004/001741, dated Mar. 3, 2005. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2004/001747, dated Aug. 10, 2004. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2004/001751, dated Mar. 21, 2005. |
International Search Report, PCT/GB2009/001760, dated Mar. 1, 2010, Rapiscan Systems, Inc. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/037167, dated Sep. 7, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/313,854. |
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,066. |
Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,066. |
Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/674,086. |
Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,066. |
Second office action for Japanese Application No. JP2012-514109 dated Oct. 20, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,666. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/674,086. |
Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/674,086. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2010/37167, dated Dec. 9, 2010. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2012/40923, dated Sep. 21, 2012, Rapiscan Systems, Inc. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-515989, dated Nov. 19, 2015. |
Examination Report for for EP15174771, CXR Limited, dated Apr. 5, 2017. |
Dijon et al. “Towards a low-cost high-quality carbon-nanotube field-emission display”, Revised version of a paper presented at the 2004 SID International Symposium held May 25-27, 2004 in Seattle, Washington, Journal of the SID Dec. 4, 2004, pp. 373-378. |
Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/739,833. |
European Search Report for EP 15174778, CXR Limited, completed on Sep. 18, 2015. |
European Search Report for EP 15174778, CXR Limited, dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
Keevil, S.V., Lawinski, C.P. and Morton, E.J., 1987, “Measurement of the performance characteristics of anti-scatter grids.”, Phys. Med. Biol., 32(3), 397-403. |
Morton, E.J., Webb, S., Bateman, J.E., Clarke, L.J. and Shelton, C.G., 1990, “Three-dimensional x-ray micro-tomography for medical and biological applications.”, Phys. Med. Biol., 35(7), 805-820. |
Morton, E.J., Swindell, W, Lewis, D.G. and Evans, P.M., 1991, “A linear array scintillation-crystal photodiode detector for megavoltage imaging.”, Med. Phys., 18(4), 681-691. |
Morton, E.J., Lewis, D.G. and Swindell, W., 1988, “A method for the assessment of radiotherapy treatment precision”, Brit. J. Radiol., Supplement 22, 25. |
Swindell, W., Morton, E.J., Evans, P.M. and Lewis, D.G., 1991, “The design of megavoltage projection imaging systems: some theoretical aspects.”, Med. Phys.,18(5), 855-866. |
Morton, E.J., Evans, P.M., Ferraro, M., Young, E.F. and Swindell, W., 1991, “A video frame store facility for an external beam radiotherapy treatment simulator.”, Brit. J. Radiol., 64, 747-750. |
Antonuk, L.E., Yorkston, J., Kim, C.W., Huang, W., Morton, E.J., Longo, M.J. and Street, R.A., 1991, “Light response characteristics of amorphous silicon arrays for megavoltage and diagnostic imaging.”, Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., 219, 531-536. |
Yorkston, J., Antonuk, L.E., Morton, E.J., Boudry, J., Huang, W., Kim, C.W., Longo, M.J. and Street, R.A., 1991, “The dynamic response of hydrogenated amorphous silicon imaging pixels.”, Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., 219, 173-178. |
Evans, P.M., Gildersleve, J.Q., Morton, E.J., Swindell, W., Coles, R., Ferraro, M., Rawlings, C., Xiao, Z.R. and Dyer, J., 1992, “Image comparison techniques for use with megavoltage imaging systems.”, Brit. J. Radiol., 65, 701-709. |
Morton, E.J., Webb, S., Bateman, J.E., Clarke, L.J. and Shelton, C.G., 1989, “The development of 3D x-ray micro-tomography at sub 100Ā?Âμresoresolution with medical, industrial and biological applications.”, Presentation at IEE colloquium “Medical scanning and imaging techniques of value in non-destructive testing”, London, Nov. 3, 1989. |
Antonuk, L.E., Boudry, J., Huang, W., McShan, D.L., Morton, E.J., Yorkston, J, Longo, M.J. and Street, R.A., 1992, “Demonstration of megavoltage and diagnostic x-ray imaging with hydrogenated amorphous silicon arrays.”, Med. Phys., 19(6), 1455-1466. |
Gildersleve, J.Q., Swindell, W., Evans, P.M., Morton, E.J., Rawlings, C. and Dearnaley, D.P., 1991, “Verification of patient positioning during radiotherapy using an integrated megavoltage imaging system.”, in “Tumour Response Monitoring and Treatment Planning”, Proceedings of the International Symposium of the W. Vaillant Foundation on Advanced Radiation Therapy, Munich, Germany, Ed A. Breit (Berlin: Springer), 693-695. |
Lewis, D.G., Evans, P.M., Morton, E.J., Swindell, W. and Xiao, X.R., 1992, “A megavoltage CT scanner for radiotherapy verification.”, Phys. Med. Biol., 37, 1985-1999. |
Antonuk, L.E., Boudry, J., Kim, C.W., Longo, M.J., Morton, E.J., Yorkston, J. and Street, R.A., 1991, “Signal, noise and readout considerations in the development of amorphous silicon photodiode arrays for radiotherapy and diagnostic x-ray imaging.”, SPIE vol. 1443 Medical Imaging V: Image Physics, 108-119. |
Antonuk, L.E., Yorkston, J., Huang, W., Boudry, J., Morton, E.J., Longo, M.J. and Street, R.A., 1992, “Radiation response characteristics of amorphous silicon arrays for megavoltage radiotherapy imaging.”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 39,1069-1073. |
Antonuk, L.E., Yorkston, J., Huang, W., Boudry, J., Morton, E.J., Longo, M.J. and Street, R.A., 1992, “Factors affecting image quality for megavoltage and diagnostic x-ray a-Si:H imaging arrays.”, Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., 258, 1069-1074. |
Antonuk, L.E., Boudry, J., Yorkston, J., Morton, E.J., Huang, W. and Street, R.A., 1992, “Development of thin-film, flat-panel arrays for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging.”, SPIE vol. 1651, Medical Imaging VI: Instrumentation, 94-105. |
Yorkston, J., Antonuk, L.E., Seraji, N., Boudry, J., Huang, W., Morton, E.J., and Street, R.A., 1992, “Comparison of commputer simulations with measurements from a-Si:H imaging arrays.”, Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., 258, 1163-1168. |
Morton, E.J., Antonuk, L.E., Berry, J.E., Boudry, J., Huang, W., Mody, P., Yorkston, J. and Longo, M.J., 1992, “A CAMAC based data acquisition system for flat-panel image array readout”, Presentation at IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Orlando, Oct. 25-31, 1992. |
Antonuk, L.E., Yorkston, J., Huang, W., Boudry, J., Morton, E.J. and Street, R.A., 1993, “Large area, flat-panel a-Si:H arrays for x-ray imaging.”, SPIE vol. 1896, Medical Imaging 1993: Physics of Medical Imaging, 18-29. |
Morton, E.J., Antonuk, L.E., Berry, J.E., Huang, W., Mody, P. and Yorkston, J., 1994, “A data acquisition system for flat-panel imaging arrays”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 41(4), 1150-1154. |
Antonuk, L.E., Boudry, J., Huang, W., Lam, K.L., Morton, E.J., TenHaken, R.K., Yorkston, J. and Clinthorne, N.H., 1994, “Thin-film, flat-panel, composite imagers for projection and tomographic imaging”, IEEE Trans. Med. Im., 13(3), 482-490. |
Gildersleve, J., Dearnaley, D., Evans, P., Morton, E.J. and Swindell, W., 1994, “Preliminary clinical performance of a scanning detector for rapid portal imaging”, Clin. Oncol., 6, 245-250. |
Hess, R., De Antonis, P., Morton, E.J. and Gilboy, W.B., 1994, “Analysis of the pulse shapes obtained from single crystal CdZnTe radiation detectors”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A353, 76-79. |
DeAntonis, P., Morton, E.J., T. Menezes, 1996, “Measuring the bulk resistivity of CdZnTe single crystal detectors using a contactless alternating electric field method”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A380, 157-159. |
DeAntonis, P., Morton, E.J., Podd, F., 1996, “Infra-red microscopy of CdZnTe radiation detectors revealing their internal electric field structure under bias”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 43(3), 1487-1490. |
Tavora, L.M.N., Morgado, R.E., Estep, R.J., Rawool-Sullivan, M., Gilboy, W.B. and Morton, E.J., 1998, “One-sided imaging of large, dense, objects using the 511 keV photons from induced pair production”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 45(3), 970-975. |
Morton, E.J., 1995, “Archaeological potential of computerised tomography”, Presentation at IEE Colloquium on “NDT in archaeology and art”, London, May 25, 1995. |
Tavora, L.M.N. and Morton, E.J., 1998, “Photon production using a low energy electron expansion of the EGS4 code system”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., B143, 253-271. |
Patel, D.C. and Morton, E.J., 1998, “Analysis of improved adiabatic pseudo- domino logic family”, Electron. Lett., 34(19), 1829-1830. |
Kundu, A and Morton, E.J., 1999, “Numerical simulation of argon-methane gas filled proportional counters”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A422, 286-290. |
Luggar, R.D., Key, M.J., Morton, E.J. and Gilboy, W.B., 1999, “Energy dispersive X-ray scatter for measurement of oil/water ratios”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A422, 938-941. |
Morton, E.J., Crockett, G.M., Sellin, P.J. and DeAntonis, P., 1999, “The charged particle response of CdZnTe radiation detectors”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A422, 169-172. |
Morton, E.J., Clark, R.J. and Crowley, C., 1999, “Factors affecting the spectral resolution of scintillation detectors”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A422, 155-158. |
Morton, E.J., Caunt, J.C., Schoop, K., Swinhoe, M., 1996, “A new handheld nuclear material analyser for safeguards purposes”, Presentation at INMM annual meeting, Naples, Florida, Jul. 1996. |
Hepworth, S., McJury, M., Oldham, M., Morton, E.J. and Doran, S.J., 1999, “Dose mapping of inhomogeneities positioned in radiosensitive polymer gels”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A422, 756-760. |
Morton, E.J., Luggar, R.D., Key, M.J., Kundu, A., Tavora, L.M.N. and Gilboy, W.B., 1999, “Development of a high speed X-ray tomography system for multiphase flow imaging”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 46 III(1), 380-384. |
Tavora, L.M.N., Morton, E.J., Santos, F.P. and Dias, T.H.V.T., 2000, “Simulation of X-ray tubes for imaging applications”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 47, 1493-1497. |
TĀ?Âvora, L.M.N., Morton, E.J. and Gilboy, W.B., 2000, “Design considerations for transmission X-ray tubes operated at diagnostic energies”, J. Phys. D: Applied Physics, 33(19), 2497-2507. |
Morton, E.J., Hossain, M.A., DeAntonis, P. and Ede, A.M.D., 2001, “Investigation of Au—CdZnTe contacts using photovoltaic measurements”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A458, 558-562. |
Ede, A.M.D., Morton, E.J. and DeAntonis, P., 2001, “Thin-film CdTe for imaging detector applications”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A458, 7-11. |
TĀ?Âvora, L.M.N., Morton, E.J. and Gilboy, W.B., 2001, “Enhancing the ratio of fluorescence to bremsstrahlung radiation in X-ray tube spectra”, App. Rad. and Isotopes, 54(1), 59-72. |
Menezes, T. and Morton, E.J., 2001, “A preamplifier with digital output for semiconductor detectors”, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A., A459, 303-318. |
Johnson, D.R., Kyriou, J., Morton, E.J., Clifton, A.C. Fitzgerald, M. and MacSweeney, J.E., 2001, “Radiation protection in interventional radiology”, Clin. Rad., 56(2), 99-106. |
Tavora, L.M.N., Gilboy, W.B. and Morton, E.J., 2001, “Monte Carlo studies of a novel X-ray tube anode design”, Rad. Phys. and Chem., 61, 527-529. |
“Morton, E.J., 1998, “Is film dead: the flat plate revolution”, Keynote Talk, IPEM Annual Conference, Brighton, Sep. 14-17, 1998”\. |
Luggar, R.D., Morton, E.J., Jenneson, P.M. and Key, M.J., 2001, “X-ray tomographic imaging in industrial process control”, Rad. Phys. Chem., 61, 785-787. |
Luggar, R.D., Morton, E.J., Key, M.J., Jenneson, P.M. and Gilboy, W.B., 1999, “An electronically gated multi-emitter X-ray source for high speed tomography”, Presentation at SPIE Annual Meeting, Denver, Jul. 19-23, 1999. |
Gregory, P.J., Hutchinson, D.J., Read, D.B., Jenneson, P.M., Gilboy, W.B. and Morton, E.J., 2001, “Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray microtomography”, Plant and Soil, 255(1), 351-359. |
Kundu, A., Morton, E.J., Key, M.J. and Luggar, R.D., 1999, “Monte Carlo simulations of microgap gas-filled proportional counters”, Presentation at SPIE Annual Meeting, Denver, Jul. 19-23, 1999. |
Hossain, M.A., Morton, E.J., and Ozsan, M.E., 2002, “Photo-electronic investigation of CdZnTe spectral detectors”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci, 49(4), 1960-1964. |
Panman, A., Morton, E.J., Kundu, A and Sellin, P.J., 1999, “Optical Monte Carlo transport in scintillators”, Presentation at SPIE Annual Meeting, Denver, Jul. 19-23, 1999. |
Jenneson, P.M., Gilboy, W.B., Morton, E.J., and Gregory, P.J., 2003, “An X-ray micro-tomography system optimised for low dose study of living organisms”, App. Rad. Isotopes, 58, 177-181. |
Key, M.J., Morton, E.J., Luggar, R.D. and Kundu, A., 2003, “Gas microstrip detectors for X-ray tomographic flow imaging”, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A496, 504-508. |
Jenneson, P.M., Luggar, R.D., Morton, E.J., Gundogdu, O, and Tuzun, U, 2004, “Examining nanoparticle assemblies using high spatial resolution X-ray microtomography”, J. App. Phys, 96(5), 2889-2894. |
Tavora, L.M., Gilboy, W.B. and Morton, E.J., 2000, “Influence of backscattered electrons on X-ray tube output”, Presentation at SPIE Annual Meeting, San Diego, Jul. 30-Aug. 3, 2000. |
Wadeson, N., Morton, E.J., and Lionheart, W.B., 2010, “Scatter in an uncollimated x-ray CT machine based on a Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation”, SPIE Medical Imaging 2010: Physics of Medical Imaging, Feb. 15-18, 2010, San Diego, USA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160343533 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13313854 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14635814 | US | |
Parent | 12478757 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13313854 | US | |
Parent | 12033035 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 12364067 | US | |
Parent | 10554569 | US | |
Child | 12033035 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14635814 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15132439 | US | |
Parent | 12364067 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 12478757 | US |