1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns an x-ray tube of the type having at least one cathode to generate an electron beam, an anode at which the electron beam strikes and there forms a focal spot so that an x-ray beam emanates from the focal spot, an exit window through which the x-ray beam exits from the x-ray tube, and a backscatter electron trap in order to capture electrons backscattering from the anode. The invention also concerns an x-ray device with such an x-ray tube.
2. Description of the Prior Art
An x-ray tube of the above general type is described in United States Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0112538.
An x-ray tube normally has a cathode and an oppositely situated anode that are arranged in a vacuum housing. The cathode has a filament to emit electrons, and the electrons are accelerated in the direction toward the anode by application of a voltage between the anode and the cathode. The electrons strike a region of the anode that is designated as the focal spot, wherein their kinetic energy is transduced into heat and x-ray radiation (primary radiation). The x-ray radiation that is thereby generated exits from the vacuum housing through an exit window in the form of an x-ray beam (usable x-rays). An electron striking the anode experiences scattering processes at the atoms in the anode that both alter its direction of motion and emit energy. If the kinetic energy of the electron drops sufficiently, it is absorbed into the anode.
Such scattered electrons can also exit the anode again, such that a portion of the incident electrons exits the anode surface again. These electrons are designated as backscatter electrons. Some of the backscatter electrons may strike the anode again and some may strike additional components of the x-ray tube and there transduce their energy into radiation or heat. X-ray radiation generated by the backscatter electrons is designated as extrafocal x-ray radiation (extrafocal radiation) because it arises outside of the impact surface of the primary electron beam. A higher proportion of extrafocal radiation produces an increase in the blurriness of the optical focal spot and thus negatively affects the image quality.
Particularly in modern “unipolar” high power x-ray tubes for computed tomography, a backscatter electron trap (BSE trap) is necessary in order to capture the electrons backscattered from the anode. The trap has the primary purpose of capturing the energy stored in these backscatter electrons and thus keeping it away from the anode, since if this energy were absorbed in the anode it would be more difficult to cool. The BSE trap additionally offers the possibility of masking the unwanted extrafocal radiation with absorption filters located as close as possible to the location of generation of the used usable x-ray radiation, thus collimating the useful radiation. However, it is undesirably physically unavoidable that extrafocal radiation arises at the BSE trap upon impact of the electrons. The image quality can be degraded by the extrafocal radiation. Furthermore, the dose exposure of a patient is increased in an x-ray examination.
An object of the present invention is to provide an arrangement in which the arising extrafocal radiation does not fall in the primary usable x-ray beam emanating from the focal spot on the anode.
According to the invention, the backscatter electron trap is designed so that it has substantially no surface region situated opposite the x-ray beam and facing toward the x-ray beam, at which surface region at least one partial surface region is visible (“seen”) both from an arbitrary point in the x-ray beam outside of the x-ray tube and from an arbitrary point of the focal spot.
The invention in particular concerns backscatter electron traps or the region of a backscatter electron trap in a region of the x-ray tube between a plane established by the exit window and a plane parallel to this in which the electron beam lies.
The invention also in particular concerns those backscatter electron traps or that region of backscatter electron traps whose projection in the direction of an electron beam emanating from the cathode coincides with the usable x-ray beam.
Insignificant surface regions—for example at the connecting line between a partial surface region with the cited features and an additional partial surface region without the cited properties—should remain outside of consideration.
“Visible” in the context of the invention means that there is a direct connecting line between stated points or areas that does not travel at least in segments through at least one medium absorbing x-ray radiation.
The design of the backscatter electron trap according to the invention prevents electrons backscattering from the surface of the anode from directly (i.e. without additional scattering) striking the backscatter electron trap and generating x-ray radiation (extrafocal radiation) there upon impact, which x-ray radiation falls in the usable x-ray beam and thereby degrades the quality of the generated x-ray radiation and the image quality or, respectively, leads to an unnecessary radiation exposure for a patient. This applies particularly for extrafocal radiation that passes from the backscatter electron trap through the exit window in a direction of usable x-ray radiation, i.e. in a radiation direction present in the usable x-ray beam (usable x-ray). Extrafocal radiation of another radiation direction does in fact leave the x-ray beam at a defined distance from the x-ray tube, but possibly only at a distance that is past the examination or detector region of an x-ray detector in which the x-ray tube according to the invention is used. However, given typical x-ray devices for medical technology a detector clearance of at least 50 cm from the focal spot of the x-ray tube can be assumed, such that extrafocal radiation that exits from the usable x-ray beam beforehand at most slightly negatively affects the image quality. According to the invention, those surface regions or partial surface regions of the backscatter electron trap are therefore to be avoided that can be struck directly by backscattered electrons and are visible as considered from an arbitrary point in the x-ray beam outside of the x-ray tube at at least a 50 cm clearance from the focal spot.
The goal of the invention is also to avoid in the backscatter electron trap partial surface regions at which the backscattered electrons directly strike and can generate x-ray radiation upon impact, which x-ray radiation falls in the usable x-ray beam and exits from the x-ray tube along a direction of usable x-ray radiation. Usable x-ray radiation direction is any x-ray radiation direction occurring in the usable x-ray beam. If any extrafocal radiation with such a radiation direction is prevented, the x-ray detector can be located at an arbitrary distance from the focal spot without it being able to be directly struck by extrafocal radiation.
The x-ray tube according to the invention is suitable to generate an x-ray beam to examine an examination subject in an x-ray device, wherein the x-ray beam is detected by an x-ray detector of the x-ray device after the penetration of the examination subject. According to the invention, the backscatter electron trap of the x-ray tube advantageously has no partial surface region visible from the viewpoint of the x-ray detector which is also visible as considered from the focal spot of the x-ray tube.
In an embodiment of the invention the appertaining surface region of the backscatter electron trap has multiple first partial surface regions separated from one another that are at least partially visible as considered from an arbitrary point in the x-ray beam outside of the x-ray tube, which first partial surface regions are not visible as considered from an arbitrary point of the focal spot. At least two first partial surface regions separated from one another are thereby advantageously separated from one another by at least one second partial surface region that is not visible from an arbitrary point in the x-ray beam outside of the x-ray tube and from an arbitrary point of the focal spot. By this special design of the backscatter electron trap according to the invention it is possible that electrons backscattered from the focal spot at a defined (in particular relatively flat) angle relative to the anode strike the backscatter electron trap (and in particular at its edge region) and are absorbed there. The proportion of electrons captured by the backscatter electron trap is thereby increased.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, each second partial surface region is aligned at least approximately orthogonal to a connecting line between the focal spot and the respective second partial surface region. The second partial surface regions are thus aligned towards the focal spot. Directly backscattered electrons thereby strike at least approximately orthogonally on the second partial surface regions. This increases the absorption rate of backscattered electrons and reduces repeat scattering.
In a schematic, simplified representation,
During the operation of the x-ray tube 1, a portion of the electrons emitted by the cathode 2 are scattered back from the anode 3 upon striking the focal spot 7 there. A backscatter electron trap 4 is present in the x-ray tube 1 to capture such backscatter electrons 9. This normally has a concave surface 5 directed towards the focal spot 7, at which concave surface 5 a majority of the backscattered electrons impact and are absorbed there.
However, it cannot be prevented that x-ray radiation (extrafocal radiation) is also created upon the backscattered electrons striking the backscatter electron trap 4. Depending on the geometry of the arrangement, the extrafocal radiation that is created in the region of the concave surface 5 cannot leave the x-ray tube 1 through the exit window 12 in the direction of the usable x-ray radiation 8, and the quality of the usable x-ray radiation is thereby degraded. Otherwise it behaves as with the surface region 13 situated opposite x-ray beam 8 and facing towards this, which surface region 13 corresponds (from the point of view of
The extrafocal radiation is particularly interfering when it strikes an x-ray detector given use of the x-ray tube 1 in an x-ray device. This is in particular the case when the radiation direction of the extrafocal radiation coincides with a radiation direction of the usable x-ray radiation 8. Otherwise it would be possible that the generated extrafocal radiation again exits from the usable x-ray radiation before this strikes the x-ray detector. This extrafocal radiation would therefore be less disruptive.
A more refined approach can be reasonable given the rough differentiation between partial surface regions that are visible from the outside and those that are not visible from the outside. An interfering extrafocal radiation can emanate from a partial surface region that is visible as considered from a point outside of the x-ray tube 1 and within the usable x-ray beam 8. Moreover, in particular those partial surface regions are relevant that are visible from a point within the usable x-ray beam 8 with at least 50 cm clearance from the focal spot 7. In particular, given these partial surface regions there exists the risk that extrafocal radiation undesirably arrives at an x-ray detector, since the distance between the focal spot and an x-ray detector is conventionally greater than 50 cm.
Furthermore, those surface regions are to be avoided that are visible as viewed both from the focal spot 7 and from a point within the usable beam 8 and counter to a radiation direction occurring in the x-ray beam 8. An interfering extrafocal radiation can always emanate from such partial surface regions, independent of the distance between the focal spot 7 and the radiation detector.
Moreover, those partial surface regions are naturally to be avoided that are visible as considered both from the focal spot 7 and from a point of the x-ray detector. In this case, the x-ray detector will always be struck by extrafocal radiation.
Although modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventors to embody within the patent warranted heron all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 047 866 | Sep 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/064394 | 9/29/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/15/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/039204 | 4/7/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5128977 | Danos | Jul 1992 | A |
5511104 | Mueller et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5995585 | Salason | Nov 1999 | A |
6005918 | Harris et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
7778391 | Fuerst et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7839979 | Hauttmann et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20060050850 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080112538 | Rogers | May 2008 | A1 |
20090028409 | Tsukagoshi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11273597 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2004111336 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004111336 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2007059268 | Mar 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Translation of JP 2004-111336 A published on Apr. 8, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120170715 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |