1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns an x-ray tube with a control end arrangement to control an electron beam that is used to generate x-rays in the x-ray tube.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In an x-ray tube, an electron beam is generated with a heatable cathode (also called a thermionic emitter), the electron beam being accelerated toward an anode serving as a target so as to generate x-rays on impact. The intensity of the generated x-ray radiation is thereby determined by the current represented by the electrons, i.e. the electrons striking the anode per time unit. Particularly in computed tomography, it can be necessary to vary the strength of the current formed by the electron beam within a few milliseconds or even microseconds.
This current typically can be controlled by means of temperature changes of the emitter. Although time constants of only a few milliseconds occur for an increase of the current, time constants of over 100 ms occur upon decreasing the current.
As an alternative to this technique, the current can be controlled by the use of a device known as a Wehnelt cylinder. Such a Wehnelt cylinder is a cylindrical control electrode that is mounted in immediate proximity to the emitter and is provided with a negative electrical potential relative to the emitter. By adjusting this potential, the number of electrons that can overcome this potential is varied, and thus the strength of the resulting current is correspondingly varied. Only relatively small currents can be controlled with a Wehnelt cylinder, however, and a significant refocusing of the electron beam by the cylinder occurs.
Grid-shaped control electrode arrangements also offer an additional arrangement for control of the beam current. Such arrangements are known from acceleration technology. A problem with such grid arrangements is that the electrons escaping from the emitter and striking the control electrodes can significantly heat said control electrodes, which can lead to the destruction of the control electrodes. Therefore, such a system operated in a pulsed manner, with the emission times of the emitter amounting to only a few percent of the total operating cycle. For example, given a pulse current of 1 A with an emission time of 1.5% and pulse frequencies in the kHz range, the average current reduces to 15 mA, which is too low for application in computed tomography, for example. Moreover, the control effect of the grid-shaped control electrode arrangement is affected by the high acceleration voltage that is present at the anode and the electrical field caused thereby. This effect of the acceleration voltage on the field caused by the control electrodes is known as the inverse field amplification factor.
An object of the present invention is to provide an x-ray tube in which the electron beam generated by a thermionic emitter and the current caused by the electron beam can be controlled and the disadvantages cited above are avoided.
This object is achieved by an x-ray according to the invention, having an anode and a thermionic emitter with multiple emitter regions spaced from one another that generate, between the emitter and the anode, an electron beam composed of multiple partial beams respectively generated by the emitter regions. Between the emitter and the anode is a control electrode arrangement that has a number of passages or transmission windows for the partial beams that lie between the individual control electrodes forming the control electrode arrangement, and with which a variable electrical field can be generated to control the partial beams. The control electrode arrangement has multiple control electrode layers that are arranged one after another between the emitter and the anode, and each electrode layer can exhibit a different voltage. The individual emitter regions and the control electrodes are arranged and controllable relative to one another such that each partial beam generated by the individual emitter regions proceeds substantially in its entirety through the passage respectively associated with that partial beam.
In the context of the present application, the term “substantially in its entirety” means that the proportion of the electrons striking the control electrodes is less than 1% of the entire beam and is accordingly practically negligible.
The use of the control electrode arrangement enables the current caused by the electron beam to be controlled—thus to be varied in terms of its strength—by varying a voltage applied to the control electrodes, and therefore a variation of the electrical field caused by this is likewise produced, which affects both the geometry of the electron beam and the number of electrons propagating therein to the anode per time unit (thus the amperage). The potential difference between the emitter and the corresponding control electrodes is the voltage. The aforementioned arrangement of emitter regions and control electrodes also avoids heating of the control electrodes that could ultimately lead to their destruction, since almost all electrons in each partial beam proceed through the respective passages and therefore do not strike the control electrodes. In contrast to the approach known from the aforementioned acceleration technology, continuous operation of the x-ray tube is thus possible.
Since the control electrode arrangement has multiple control electrode systems arranged one after another, a particularly good focusing of the electron beam (and simultaneously a precise control of the current) is possible. Moreover, the field inverse amplification factor of the anode voltage is reduced.
A flat emitter is advantageously used as an emitter since this is particularly suitable to generate high amperages.
In an embodiment wherein control electrode layer is arranged at least approximately in a plane spanned by the emitter regions, a particularly advantageous use of the electrical field caused by the control electrodes to control the current is achieved.
In an embodiment wherein the control electrode layer closest to the electrode has a number of independently controllable control electrodes that can each exhibit a different voltage, partial beams can be individually deflected and a focusing of the individual partial beams can thus be achieved, such that in particular the use of large-area emitters with a particularly high number of emitter regions and partial beams generated by these regions is enabled. A focused electron beam with high amperage thus can be generated.
In order to avoid an influencing the control of the partial beams by the electrical field caused by the anode, thus to minimize the inverse amplification factor, in a preferred embodiment of the invention the ratio of the width of a passage to the distance of a control electrode layer from the emitter is chosen smaller than 1:3. The width of a passage is thereby dimensioned as the separation of two control electrodes perpendicular to the direction of the electron beam within a control electrode layer.
In an embodiment wherein the central beam of a partial beam is aligned to the greatest possible extent parallel to the perpendicular bisectors of the passage associated with this, the electrons emitted from the emitter do not strike the control electrodes and thus almost all of the electrons penetrate through the corresponding passages. This is further ensured when the emitter region is smaller than the projection area of a passage opposite the electrode radiation direction toward the emitter.
According to
In operation of the x-ray tube, the emitter 4 and therefore the individual emitter regions 4a-4c are heated so that these respectively emit a partial beam 18a-18c of electrons that combine into an electron beam 18. This electron beam 18, namely the individual partial beams 18a-18c with the respective central beam Z extend from the corresponding emitter regions 4a-4c through the control electrode arrangement 6 to the anode 2. The individual control electrodes 8 through 14 and the emitter regions 4a-4c are now arranged relative to one another such that the partial beams 18a-18c generated by the individual emitter regions 4a-4c penetrate substantially in their entirety through a passage 16 associated with these, thus do not strike the control electrodes 8, 10, 12, 14. This is also achieved in this case in that the respective central beams Z coincide with the perpendicular bisectors M of the passages 16.
The respective voltage U of the control electrodes 8, 10, 12, 14 can be varied independently so that a variable electrical field is hereby generated. This field also has an effect on the geometry of the individual partial beams 18a-18c. In the shown exemplary embodiment, the respective control electrodes 8, 10, 12, 14 within a control electrode layer 6a-6d respectively exhibit the same voltage U while the voltages U of the individual control electrode layers 6a-d increase from the emitter 4 to the anode 2 as viewed in the beam direction. For example, a voltage U of −1 V is applied to the control electrodes 14, a voltage of 30 V is applied to the control electrodes 8, a voltage of 1000 V is applied to the control electrodes 10 and a voltage of 10000 V is applied to the control electrodes 12 while the emitter 4 exhibits the reference potential of 0 V. To control the current I caused by the electron beam 18, the voltages U applied to the control electrodes 8, 10, 12, 14 can be varied so that these generate a different electrical field and the strength of the current I can hereby be increased or decreased.
Such a curve of the current I depending on voltage U applied to the control electrode layer 6c situated closest to the anode is shown in
The design of an emitter 4 formed from a flat emitter is shown in
In
In
Such an x-ray tube in which a number of control electrodes 12 that can be controlled independently of one another within the control electrode layer 6c closest to the anode 2, is shown in
Although modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventor to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of his contribution to the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 007 217.9 | Feb 2009 | DE | national |