Yielding column

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6655877
  • Patent Number
    6,655,877
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 16, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 2, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Swann; J. J.
    • Mitchell; Katherine
    Agents
    • Shoemaker and Mattare
Abstract
A yielding column for support mine roofs or the like includes a tube provided with one or more circumferential rows of slots which provide a preferred locus for buckling. A reinforcing sleeve within the tube prevents inward buckling, so that the buckled portions are easily seen.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to a yielding column for use in mines or structures.




Yielding columns are used in mines to provide indications of roof movement possibly leading to roof failure, while supporting the roof. A portion of the column is designed to provide a visible indication of yielding at a load somewhat below the ultimate strength of the column. A good column absorbs a lot of strain before it fails.

FIG. 6

shows the characteristics of various roof-supporting arrangements. Wood cribs are excellent in this regard, as they have a long, flat stress-strain curve.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the invention is provide a yielding column providing an improved visible indication of load indicative of potential roof failure.




Another object is to provide a support having a broad stress-strain curve.




These and other objects are attained by a yielding column as described below.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the accompanying drawings,





FIG. 1

is a front elevation of a yielding column embodying the invention, partly broken away to show a cross-section thereof on a vertical bisecting plane;





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view thereof, taken on the line


2





2


in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a view like

FIG. 1

, showing the column in its post-yield configuration;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view thereof, corresponding to

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 5

is a stress-strain diagram for the column under compression; and





FIG. 6

is a similar stress-strain diagram of various prior art structures, with a portion of the diagram of

FIG. 5

superimposed.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




A yielding column embodying the invention comprises a steel tube


10


having foot and head plates


12


,


14


. The head plate


14


is welded to a screw pipe


16


. The external threads of the screw pipe engage internal threads on a collar


18


. The collar is circumferentially undercut to the inner diameter of the tube at its bottom, leaving an external circumferential shoulder


20


at the top. The undercut portion has a circumferential groove


21


in its outer surface for receiving a set screw


22


which is received in a threaded hole


24


extending through the wall of the tube near its upper end


26


. The collar shoulder bears against this upper end. The hole


28


at the collar end is for receiving a wrench (not shown).




A number of slots


30


are formed in the wall of the tube. Preferably, each slot has a fixed width, except at its rounded ends


32


, and extends entirely through the tube wall. The slots are preferably arranged in two or more circumferential rows “R”, the spacing of slots within each row being uniform and extending around the entire circumference. The row-to-row spacing is preferably uniform as well. Alternating rows are staggered so that the slots are misaligned between adjacent rows, preferably by one-half of the slot-to-slot pitch within a given row.




The height “H” and width “W” of the slots may be varied according to the desired predetermined axial load; the geometry shown in the drawings is merely preferred. The drawings show four slots in each row. Each slot has a width about twice the wall thickness “T”, and a height about three times the slot width. The load-supporting pillars


34


remaining between the slots thus have approximately equal height and width, each about three times the wall thickness. The combined load bearing capacity of the pillars is reduced in proportion to the width of the slots.




A reinforcing sleeve


36


fits snugly within the tube


10


, to prevent inward buckling and to keep the ends of the tube aligned. It is sufficiently long to span at least the length of all the slots, and short enough not to become a load-bearing member as the column collapses.




Under progressive axial load, the pillars deform elastically at first. When the load exceeds a limit determined by their size, material and geometry, the pillars tend to buckle in a direction perpendicular to the wall thickness. They are prevented from buckling inward by the reinforcing sleeve, and thus fold outward, increasingly until their tops and bottoms meet, as shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

. The pillar deformation is substantially plastic, and the results are highly visible. Thus an inspector can spot from a distance a column which is overloaded.




As one can see in

FIG. 5

, the column strength declines while one row of pillars are buckling. For this reason, the rows collapse one at a time, producing the undulating stress-strain curve shown. The curve can be extended, up to a point, by providing more rows of slots.




The strength of the column is affected by the geometry of the pillars. Taller, or more slender, columns tend to buckle under less load. There is no minimum slot width: the invention works with slots (slits) having little or no width. Any number of slots may be provided, up to a maximum where the pillar width is less than the tube wall thickness and the pillars would tend to buckle sideways. If the pillars are too short, they will yield in pure (plastic) compression, which is hard to see, and they would not in that case absorb as much strain, so I prefer that the pillar height be at least three times the wall thickness. The slots need not have uniform width. “Slots” should be understood to include other aperture shapes, including circular holes. The ends of the slots need not be rounded, as shown, but rounding is preferred to prevent stress concentration at the ends of the slots. Also, while the column need not necessarily be round in cross-section, that is my preference. “Tube” should be understod to include non-circular tubes. Furthermore, it is possible that the invention may be applied to tubes having non-uniform wall thickness.




The metal chosen should have sufficient ductility that the pillars can bend to the degree shown in

FIG. 3

without breaking. A preferred material is 1010 carbon steel.




While I have described the utility of the invention as for mine supports, the invention may find use in other applications, such as supporting portions of buildings. I intend not to limit this invention to mine use only.




Since the invention is subject to modifications and variations, it is intended that the foregoing description and the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as only illustrative of the invention defined by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A yielding mine support column comprisinga metal tube having a wall with a wall thickness, a plurality of slots extending through said wall, defining therebetween a plurality of pillars, said slots being arranged in at least one circumferential row extending around said tube, to provide a preferred locus for deformation of the tube under axial load, and a sleeve fitting snugly within the tube, said sleeve spanning at least the length of all the slots, to prevent inward buckling of the pillars and to maintain alignment between the ends of the tube, and being short enough not to become a load-bearing member as the column collapses.
  • 2. The invention of claim 1, wherein the slots are disposed in plural circumferential rows.
  • 3. The invention of claim 2, wherein the slots in adjacent rows are staggered with respect to one another.
  • 4. The invention of claim 3, wherein the slots define a plurality of pillars, and the width and number of the slots is selected so that each pillar has a height equal to at least three times said wall thickness.
  • 5. The invention of claim 4 wherein the pillars have a width greater than said wall thickness.
  • 6. The invention of claim 4, wherein the tube is made of a material which is sufficiently ductile that the material does not fail when the pillars are fully buckled.
US Referenced Citations (28)
Number Name Date Kind
1677796 Parks Jul 1928 A
2029789 Parks Feb 1936 A
2036490 Neilson et al. Apr 1936 A
2450374 Gillet Sep 1948 A
2745622 Zindel May 1956 A
3538785 Grancon Nov 1970 A
4006647 Oonuma et al. Feb 1977 A
4052029 Townsend Oct 1977 A
4255071 Koppers et al. Mar 1981 A
4269384 Saeed et al. May 1981 A
4281487 Koller Aug 1981 A
4535531 Brown Aug 1985 A
4712947 Thom Dec 1987 A
5012622 Sato et al. May 1991 A
5015125 Seegmiller May 1991 A
5056753 Lunau et al. Oct 1991 A
5160111 Hugron Nov 1992 A
5205688 Sundstrom Apr 1993 A
5207750 Rapata May 1993 A
5228810 Seegmiller Jul 1993 A
5314161 Domanski et al. May 1994 A
5400994 Shawwaf et al. Mar 1995 A
5538364 Huntsman Jul 1996 A
5564867 Domanski et al. Oct 1996 A
5725341 Hofmeister Mar 1998 A
5813649 Peterson et al. Sep 1998 A
6216413 Lapointe Apr 2001 B1
6293743 Ernst et al. Sep 2001 B1